Hello,
I am considering to release Kamailio v5.6.5 (out of branch 5.6) later
this week (likely on Thursday or Friday, Nov 23/24, 2023). If anyone is
aware of
issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in order to
have a better chance to be fixed.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services
Kamailio Advanced Training -- asipto.com
Hello!
I'm facing an issue 2/3 times a day with the following errors in the logs:
Nov 22 00:09:02 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3720]: CRITICAL: <core>
[core/mem/q_malloc.c:150]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: prev. fragm. tail
overwritten(c0c0c000, abcdefed)[0x7f9600b754f8:0x7f9600b75530]! Memory
allocator was called from core: core/re.c:430. Fragment marked by core:
db_res.c:139. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:391.
Nov 22 00:09:02 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3720]: CRITICAL: <core>
[core/mem/q_malloc.c:155]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: prev. fragm. tail
overwritten [0x7f9600b75460:0x7f9600b75498] - fragment marked by tm:
t_fwd.c:230
Nov 22 00:09:02 abrt-hook-ccpp: Process 3720 (kamailio) of user 0 killed by
SIGABRT - ignoring (repeated crash)
Do you have any idea where it could come from? I'm running Kamailio 5.6.4.
Regards,
Igor.
--
Cet e-mail a été vérifié par le logiciel antivirus d'Avast.
www.avast.com
Hello,
during the Kamailio Developers Meeting 2023 in Dusseldorf that took
place last week, it was proposed to obsolete modules that seem to be
unmaintained and no activity about them was noticed during the past
years. It is quite some overhead in packaging them and trying to keep
them compiling when they have external dependencies, therefore such step
should spare some resources in the future.
The list (see below) was built based on the options of those present at
the meeting, now we want to discuss it on the larger communities of
developers and users. If you are using any of these modules or you think
any of them worth keeping, reply with the names of the modules that you
want to be kept.
The proposed action is to relocate the obsoleted modules to a new git
repository "kamailio-obsolete" to still keep some visibility to them and
in the eventually of future interest on any of them, it can be
reintroduced in the main repository.
Next is the initial list of modules proposed to be considered obsolete:
- app_java
- app_lua_sr
- app_mono
- app_python
- app_sqlang
- auth_identity
- call_control
- db2_ldap
- db2_ops
- db_cassandra
- db_perldvdb
- dnssec
- domainpolicy
- h350
- mediaproxy
- osp
- peering
- print
- print_lib
- pua_xmpp
- ratelimit
- uid_auth_db
- uid_avp_db
- uid_domain
- uid_gflags
- uid_uri_db
- uri_db
- xmpp
- xprint
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services
Kamailio Advanced Training -- asipto.com
Hi,
Setup: kamailio acting as a UAC needs to register with a server whose
outbound proxy is DNS SRV based only, there's no A record on the proxy's
FQDN. The provider advertises two SRV records.
;; ANSWER SECTION:
_sips._tcp.sip.provider.com. 10 IN SRV 10 50 5061 sip11-sip.provider.com.
_sips._tcp.sip.provider.com. 10 IN SRV 15 50 5061 sip10-sip.provider.com.
Everything was working fine, until the provider changed the SRV priority,
putting a lower priority on the host that is actually down at the moment.
In this case, sip11-sip.provider.com is DOWN and sip10-sip.provider.com is
UP.
Now, what's happening is Kamailio tries to REGISTER with the lower priority
host, gets no reply back (TCP connection doesn't get established). It then
takes 30 seconds for Kamailio to try the host with the higher priority,
registering successfully. And so it goes for every re-register: failure =>
30 seconds => register OK.
The same happens for INVITES to the downstream: INVITE => timeout => 30
seconds => INVITE (other host 200 OK).
I've tried to play with TCP and DNS params, but so far no luck: no matter
what I did - it took the same 30 seconds for Kamailio to detect failure and
retry the secondary host.
Any suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) 239d0a
tcp_connection_lifetime=3604
tcp_max_connections=60
tcp_connect_timeout=10
tcp_keepalive = yes
tcp_crlf_ping=yes
tcp_keepcnt=3
tcp_keepidle=30
tcp_keepintvl=30
tcp_reuse_port=1
tcp_accept_no_cl=yes
tcp_rd_buf_size=16384
use_dns_cache = on
use_dns_failover = on
dns_srv_loadbalancing = on
dns_try_naptr = on
dns_try_ipv6=no
dns_try_naptr=no
dns_use_search_list=no
dns_retr_time=1
dns_retr_no=3
Thanks
--Sergiu
Hi, I am trying to register an endpoint as follows:
REGISTER sip:siptest.booger.net SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP X.X.X.X.76:31114;branch=z9hG4bK223420485;rport
From: sip:1720XXXXXXX@siptest.booger.net;tag=962873337
To: sip:1720XXXXXXX@siptest.booger.net
Call-ID: 2053687751-32761-1(a)EH.BJI.BAE.HG
CSeq: 2067 REGISTER
Contact: sip:1720XXXXXXX@X.X.X.X:31114;reg-id=2;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:00000000-0000-1000-8000-000B82A1C58B>"
Authorization: Digest username="654fe87c-67ff-42dd-8d5e-79786a99713c", realm="siptest.booger.net", nonce="ZVaJtmVWiIrsuWc5hkzM3MUUUs8MgRFR", uri=sip:siptest.booger.net, response="119a3b6426cdcfa037bf1825b69139a5", algorithm=MD5
X-Grandstream-PBX: true
Max-Forwards: 70
User-Agent: Grandstream GXP2170 1.0.11.64
Supported: path
Expires: 120
MAC: 00:0b:82:a1:c5:8b
Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, UPDATE, MESSAGE
Content-Length: 0
Note that the Authorization username differs from the To-From username. This is intentional, as I am testing use of randomly generated credential .
This worked with this endpoint directly against Asterisk, for instance.
However, registering against Kamailio now, I am getting:
Nov 16 21:24:26 vs-rs01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[584855]: DEBUG: {1 2067 REGISTER 2053687751-32761-1(a)EH.BJI.BAE.HG} auth_db [authorize.c:503]: auth_check(): authentication username mismatch with from/to username
Even though I have this set in the config:
if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", 0)) { // default 1, change to 0 to skip check
0 is supposed to mean no user checks performed.
I am doing this because I want to use the complex credentials for authentication, but want the endpoint to tell me the phone number in an INVITE to/from, instead of putting in the extremely long credential.
Is there a way to get Kamailio to accept different SIP User ID and Authentication ID fields?
Thanks,
Jawaid
Hello all,
I'm using the following Lua script to fetch data from Redis, which is in form of list:
function split(str, delimiter)
for token in string.gmatch(str, "[^" .. delimiter .. "]+") do
return token
end
end
function contains(mainString, subString)
return string.find(mainString, subString, 1, true) ~= nil
end
function longest_match_acode()
local currentSeconds = os.time()
local milliseconds = os.clock() * 1000
local ddate = os.date("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", currentSeconds) .. string.format(".%03d", milliseconds)
KSR.xlog.xinfo("starting date:" ..ddate)
local size = 0
local result
local acode = "29192"
local inputbcode = "4474173"
local delimiter = ":"
while size == 0 do
local currentSeconds = os.time()
acode = string.sub(acode, 1, string.len(acode) - 1)
KSR.ndb_redis.redis_cmd("srvN", "LRANGE price:" .. acode .." 0 -1", "r")
size = tonumber(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>size)"))
end
local left = 0
local right = size - 1
while left <= right do
local currentSeconds = os.time()
local milliseconds = os.clock() * 1000
local ddate = os.date("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", currentSeconds) .. string.format(".%03d", milliseconds)
resultRight = tostring(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>value[" .. right .. "])"))
resultLeft = tostring(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>value[" .. left .. "])"))
local bcodeLeft = split(resultLeft, delimiter)
local bcodeRight = split(resultRight, delimiter)
if contains(inputbcode, bcodeRight) then
KSR.xlog.xinfo("Input bcode contains bcode value from Redis: " .. resultRight .. " at index: " .. right .. " with date: " .. ddate)
end
if contains(inputbcode, bcodeLeft) then
KSR.xlog.xinfo("Input bcode contains bcode value from Redis: " .. resultLeft .. " at index: " .. left .. " with date: " .. ddate)
end
left = left + 1
right = right - 1
end
local currentSeconds = os.time()
local milliseconds = os.clock() * 1000
local ddate = os.date("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", currentSeconds) .. string.format(".%03d", milliseconds)
KSR.xlog.xinfo("ending date:" ..ddate)
end
function ksr_request_route()
if KSR.is_INVITE() then
longest_match_acode()
KSR.sl.send_reply("404", "Not found");
end
end
I'm getting the following warning in the log : WARNING: LUA {INVITE}: <core> [core/pvapi.c:340]: pv_cache_add(): pv cache limit is going to be exceeded - pkg memory may get filled with pv declarations
I think the issue is in the following lines:
resultRight = tostring(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>value[" .. right .. "])"))
resultLeft = tostring(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>value[" .. left .. "])"))
the list coming from Redis has around 30k items, which I'm iterating through using value[x] which is exhausting the pv declaration as per my understanding.
How to overcome this issue? Is it possible to save the list as an array variable and then iterate through that array?
Regards,
Hello,
Kamailio SIP Server v5.7.3 stable release is out.
This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.7, that
includes fixes since the release of v5.7.2. There is no change to
database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do
on previous installations of v5.7.x. Deployments running previous v5.7.x
versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.7.3.
For more details about version 5.7.3 (including links and guidelines to
download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit:
* https://www.kamailio.org/w/2023/11/kamailio-v5-7-3-released/
RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well.
Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio!
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com
Hello,
I am considering to release Kamailio v5.7.3 (out of branch 5.7) soon
(likely on Friday 17 or during the beginning of next week). If anyone is
aware of issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in
order to have a better chance to be fixed.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com
I want to register SIP Trunk directly in Kamailio. How can I register the SIP trunk in Kamailio. Please find the below sample SIP trunk details.
Network IP 10.2.2.2
Subnet Mask 255.255.255.252
Customer IP 10.3.3.3
Gateway IP 10.1.1.1
SBCIP 10.4.4.4
Username 12345678
Password 1234
Please help me with configuration to register SIP trunk in kamailio.
Hi All,
I am playing around with the dlg_req_within to send a REINVITE to toggle some rtpengine parameters and this works fine.
The first time I use the command after tracking the dialog, it sends a REINVITE with an incremented CSEQ value.
However when I issue it again, it sends another REINVITE but with the same CSEQ value, so again 2 for example.
How can you ensure its incremented or can you set it somehow?
As would like to generate at least 2 reinvites per dialog.
Many thanks
Jon
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
