sr-users June 2023

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

28 participants
29 discussions

uac_replace() and uac_restore debug help
by Duarte Rocha 24 Jun '23

24 Jun '23

Hello, I'm currently experiencing some odd behaviours when using these functions and I need some help debugging to find the root of the issue. I receive a call from a client and do some changes to the To and From header using auto mode with password. Encrypted info goes on the Record-Route header parameters (vsf\vst) normally. 1 - On subsequent requests sent by the originating client, domains on To and From header are different from the ones sent in the first INVITE. In this scenario, somehow the automatic modifying has errors on the end result. Can the different domains affect the end result of the automatic modifying or only the vsf\vst parameters and password are needed to the auto replace\restore? 2 - How can I decrypt the info on vsf and vst parameters in order to verify the info sent and the encryption? Cheers, Duarte Rocha

2 1

uac_restore behaviour question
by Duarte Rocha 22 Jun '23

22 Jun '23

Hello, I have some questions regarding uac_replace methods. When I receive the first INVITE from someone I change To and From using uac_replace_to() and uac_replace_from(). I do this only on first INVITES. In order to restore them I use the "auto" so the changes are restored automatically in replies or requests sent to the call originator.. In the case of subsequent requests from the originator kamailio still changes To and From without me using uac_replace functions. Is this caused by the auto restore? Does it work for both sides and is this is the intended behaviour? Cheers

1 1

How to handle 302 redirects
by Trey Ormsbee 22 Jun '23

22 Jun '23

Hello, Im having a hard time figuring out how to handle a 302 reidrect, the uac_redirect modules shows a simple configuration. However for me, what it is not doing is changing the 302 back to invite. It is sending the 302 as is on. if(!t_check_status("3[0-9][0-9]")) { exit; } get_redirects("3:1"); t_relay(); This code just relays the 302 for me. I should add I am using this with the DISPATCHER module so perhaps that has something to do with my issue. Setup is this, kamailio is sitting between to sip servers, so the flow goes like this, sip_server_a -> kamailio -> sip_server_b. sip_server_b only responds with 302 redirects, sip_server_a does not handle 302’s at all. Kamailio will only get invites from sip_server_a, and the redirects from sip_server_b will only have one contact. How can I get kamailio to reply to sip_server_a’s invite with the updated INVITE? My config is a mesh of the dispatcher example and uac_redirect example with this specific section handling the redirect: # Sample failure route failure_route[RTF_DISPATCH] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "RTF_DISPATCH: "); if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } # next DST - only for 500 or local timeout if (t_check_status("500") or (t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied())) { if(ds_next_dst()) { t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } } if (t_check_status("302")) { xlog("L_NOTICE", "RTF_DISPATCH: 302 "); if (!get_redirects("1:1")) { xlog("L_NOTICE", "RTF_DISPATCH: failed to get_redirects "); t_reply("480", "Temporarily Unavailable"); exit; } xlog("L_NOTICE", "RTF_DISPATCH: got redirects "); t_relay(“sip_server_a”,”5060”); } } Any ideas what I am doing wrong is this supported? Im expecting once I relay this message that it should be an INVITE not a 302 redirect. I cant find any examples of anyone else really doing this.

3 3

Missing posops module from 5.7 debian repo
by Patrick Karton 20 Jun '23

20 Jun '23

hello , i have installed kamailio 5.7 from debian repo http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio57 bullseye main but i dont find the posops module in the directory modules. what is the exactly package where i can find it. Thanks.

2 5

KEMI
by iliusha.md＠gmail.com 19 Jun '23

19 Jun '23

Hello, I have the following statement: if KSR.is_method("INVITE") then KSR.log("info", "method not allowed " .. KSR.kx.get_method() .."\n"); KSR.x.exit(); end For some reason, it falls into this condition no matter which method I use, I tried OPTIONS, NOTIFY etc. log file: <core> [core/kemi.c:152]: sr_kemi_core_log(): method not allowed OPTIONS the same with this check: if KSR.is_method_in("I") then KSR.log("info", "method not allowed " .. KSR.kx.get_method() .."\n"); KSR.x.exit(); end this is the lua modparam settings: # ---- lua params ---- modparam("app_lua", "load", "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/main.lua") modparam("app_lua", "reload", 1) modparam("app_lua", "log_mode", 1) cfgengine "lua" version: kamailio 5.7.0 (x86_64/linux) 1c23c2 Any idea what I'm doing wrong?

2 1

Kamailio failover in aws/azure environment
by M Arqum CH 17 Jun '23

17 Jun '23

Hi members, I am setting up kamailio as loadbalcer for asterisk server farm with active-backup conf in Azure cloud using azure loadbalcer, for incoming it works fine external incoming traffic with nated external IP, can any one guide how to do active-backup configuration for internal traffic, as asterisk servers are running on local network. Thanks and regards Arqum

2 1

TLS errors
by nutxase 16 Jun '23

16 Jun '23

Hey All I have been setting up TLS and websocket for kamailio but i keep getting these errors in the log please can someone help me Jun 14 20:51:57 so-sbc-02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[25490]: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:51]: tls_err_ret(): TLS accept:error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:ssl3_get_client_hello:no shared cipher (sni: [sip.domain.com](http://sip.sipalto.com)) Jun 14 20:51:57 so-sbc-02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[25490]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1333]: tls_h_read_f(): src addr: 1.2.3.4.5:57265 Jun 14 20:51:57 so-sbc-02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[25490]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1336]: tls_h_read_f(): dst addr: 5.4.3.2.1:8089Jun 14 20:51:57 so-sbc-02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[25490]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1478]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f3c8fc16720 r: 0x7f3c8fc16848 (-1) my config is pretty standard so i am not sure what i am missing using letsencrypt certs #!ifdef WITH_TLS # ----- tls params ----- modparam("tls", "tls_method", "TLSv1.2+") modparam("tls", "certificate", "/etc/kamailio/tls/cert.pem") modparam("tls", "private_key", "/etc/kamailio/tls/ckey.pem") modparam("tls", "ca_list", "/etc/kamailio/tls/fullchain.pem")#!endif Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

3 5

impossible to modify $tU twice
by David VILLAUME 15 Jun '23

15 Jun '23

Hello, I’m in a scenario where i would apply different modification to $tU to User with KEMI, but I can’t achieve it. I managed to reproduce it with legacy config : Scenario 1 (both values concatenates): route[dbg] { $tU ="aaa"; $tU ="bbb"; } To: sip:aaabbb@5.5.5.5 Scenario 1 (both values concatenates and @ disapears): route[dbg] { $tU ="aaa"; $tU=$null; $tU ="bbb"; } To: sip:aaabbb5.5.5.5 --->without @ I tried different combination with [*] as for avps without success, does anyone have an idea about how to perform it ? Regards, David

3 2

Cannot achieve rtpengine HA
by Arsenijs Kabihno 13 Jun '23

13 Jun '23

Hello, We are trying to achieve rtpengine HA solely with kamailio and rtpengine module. In the following example call goes to rtpengine node 10.5.0.183:22222 and then we stop rtpengine service on this node to simulate failure. Client is triggering re-INVITE, but, apparently, kamailio sticks to initially selected rtpengine, producing the following errors: Jun 12 06:59:48 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) INFO: {2 2 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: <null>, method:INVITE, status:200, extra_id: z9hG4bK55018600, rtpengine_answer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=priv1 direction=pub1 SIP-source-address via-branch=extra rtcp-mux-offer generate-mid DTLS=passive SDES-off ICE=force RTP/SAVPF Jun 12 06:59:49 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) NOTICE: {2 2 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} acc [acc.c:287]: acc_log_request(): ACC: transaction answered: timestamp=1686553189;method=INVITE;from_tag=fcn109nfe9;to_tag=01284cc8-bc58-4104-9629-8e6bb827d97f;call_id=jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e;code=200;reason=OK;src_user=90362;src_domain=10.181.0.1;src_ip=10.5.0.145;dst_ouser=123;dst_user=123;dst_domain=10.181.0.1 Jun 12 06:59:49 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 31(37) INFO: {2 2 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: <null>, method:INVITE, status:200, extra_id: z9hG4bK55018600, rtpengine_answer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=priv1 direction=pub1 SIP-source-address via-branch=extra rtcp-mux-offer generate-mid DTLS=passive SDES-off ICE=force RTP/SAVPF Jun 12 06:59:49 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 51(57) INFO: {1 2 ACK jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: sip:10.5.2.192:5060, method:ACK, status:<null>, extra_id: <null>, rtpengine_offer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=pub1 direction=priv1 SIP-source-address rtcp-mux-demux DTLS=off SDES-off ICE=remove RTP/AVP Jun 12 06:59:49 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 51(57) INFO: {1 2 ACK jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: sip:10.5.2.192:5060, method:ACK, status:<null>, extra_id: <null>, rtpengine_offer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=pub1 direction=priv1 SIP-source-address rtcp-mux-demux DTLS=off SDES-off ICE=remove RTP/AVP Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) INFO: {2 3 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: <null>, method:INVITE, status:200, extra_id: z9hG4bK20888040, rtpengine_answer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=priv1 direction=pub1 SIP-source-address via-branch=extra rtcp-mux-offer generate-mid DTLS=passive SDES-off ICE=force RTP/SAVPF Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) ERROR: {2 3 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} rtpengine [rtpengine.c:3070]: send_rtpp_command(): can't send command "offer" to RTPEngine <udp:10.5.0.183:22222> Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 54(60) INFO: {1 3 ACK jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: sip:10.5.2.192:5060, method:ACK, status:<null>, extra_id: <null>, rtpengine_offer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=pub1 direction=priv1 SIP-source-address rtcp-mux-demux DTLS=off SDES-off ICE=remove RTP/AVP Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 54(60) ERROR: {1 3 ACK jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2706]: rtpp_function_call(): no available proxies We also found Daniel answer on similar issue here: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2713#issuecomment-823138302 Please advise how it can be solved. Kind regards, Arsenijs

4 5

Carrierroute Test API?
by sr.maillists＠gmail.com 13 Jun '23

13 Jun '23

Hi List Does someone know a function to test a number against the carrierroute module, to see which route it picked? My Idea: We have multiple Kamailio-Proxies and I would like to test a number against all hosts to see where it will be routed, without performing testcalls. Regards Stefan

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2023