Hello!
Is it possible to find out the name of the onreply_route that was set
before?
Something like this:
t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY");
...
if ( t_is_set("onreply_route") ) {
get_onreply_route_name();
...
}
--
BR,
Denys Pozniak
I have kamailio behind a TLS termination proxy so the sockets are correctly
deduced to be TCP. However the clients only talk TLS to the proxy and are
confused when the top Via header added by Kamailio is TCP. Is there a way
for Kamailio to forcibly pretend its protocol is TLS? Like
advertised_address but "advertised_protocol" instead.
(With pjsip testing: it has a flag use_tls which ignores TCP from Kamailio
and continues to use the persistent TLS transport to proxy. Linphone fails
because it tries to honor TCP in Via and is unable to establish TCP
transport).
BTW I am using t_relay_to_tcp so Kamailio will return traffic to the proxy
as TCP even though the contact addresses specify transport=TLS.
Hi everybody,
I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ. This
seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems.
When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs are
synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc.
But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is empty.
Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set?
BR, Björn
--
Björn Klasen, Specialist
TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP)
Projensdorfer Straße 324
24106 Kiel
Germany
T +49 431/ 530530
F +49 431/ 7097-555
mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de
http://www.tng.de
Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI
Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg,
Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert
Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428
I've been tasked to use LD_PRELOAD to log SSL keys for TLS connections
using a Diffie-Hellman cipher. The first attempt did not work, so I wanted
to sanity check whether Kamailio's TLS support is built in such a way that
would defeat LD_PRELOAD.
The instructions from the vendor are to update /etc/init.d/kamailio like
this:
env SSLKEYLOG_UDP='127.0.0.1:1234'
LD_PRELOAD="/usr/local/src/voipmonitor-git/tools/ssl_keylogger/sslkeylog.so
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libssl.so.3" \
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE \
--exec $DAEMON -- $OPTIONS || log_failure_msg " already
running"
Is there anything special in Kamailio (5.7.3 on Debian 12) that would
prevent this from working? Not necessarily something to defeat a keylogger,
but maybe the way tls.so gets loaded?
The only discrepancy I've noticed is the vendor docs refer to libssl.so.3
not libssl.so.1, but the vendor said that should be OK.
I'd love to hear from someone already using VoIPmonitor with Diffie-Hellman
ciphers and Kamailio.
Hello,
discussed a bit during the online Kamailio devel meeting, it is time to
set the milestones towards the next major Kamailio release series v5.8.x.
If no other suggestions that suit more developers, I would propose to
freeze by end of this month or early February, then test for about 4
weeks as usual and release by end of February or during March.
If anyone wants to add new features/modules, they have to be published
till freezing date, either pushed in the git repository or proposed as
pull request.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, February 20-22, 2024 -- asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference, April 18-19, 2024, Berlin -- kamailioworld.com
Hello,
When writing kemi cfg (python in my case), is there any way to get rid of standard cfg shared variables and use kemi cfg variables instead?
E.g. Instead of $shv(blabla) (in standard config) can I use some global python var called 'blabla'? Is it seen and shared by all kamailio processes? Or I still need to use KSR.pv.get/set("$shv(blabla)") ?
Thank you,
Stefan
Hi!
I would like to add/remove/update entries in uacreg database.
The easiest way I found is to add data using mysql and then call
kamcmd uac.reg_reload. I end up reloading too often:
uac_reg_ht_shift(): shifting in-memory table is not possible in less than
150 secs
I would like to optimize it and I tried to use
sudo kamcmd uac.reg_add
Unfortunately, the data is not persistent and seems to be only in memory.
Does it means my only choice is to follow this procedure:
Add a user:
1/ sudo kamcmd uac.reg_add
2/ add the equivalent mysql entry
Remove a user
1/ sudo kamcmd uac.reg_remove
2/ remove the equivalent mysql entry
Let me know if an alternative exists!
Regards
Aymeric
--
Antisip - http://www.antisip.com
Hello,
I propose to aim freezing the development for 5.8.x series at the end of
the 1st of February 2024 (Thursday).
New features that one wants to get in this release series have to be
pushed to git repository or pull requests made for them. Afterwards
usually follows a 4-6 weeks of testing till the first release 5.8.0.
Unfreezing will happen earlier, after the first weeks of testing when
the 5.8 branch will be created.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)
twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, February 20-22, 2024 -- asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference, April 18-19, 2024, Berlin -- kamailioworld.com
Hello all,
I'm using Kamailio as SIP redirect where I'm appending the contact header then send reply back using sl_send_reply("300","Multiple Choices").
But I'm getting "print_dset(): no r-uri or branches" as warning in the log and no packet is sent back from Kamailio to the original sender.
I'm using same Kamailio configuration in another setup and it's working correctly without facing this error.
I'm not able to detect the issue. Can you please assist?
Regards,
Hi
I was wondering what exactly happens with parallel branching in this
situation:
branch_route[BR_T]
{
if (condition)
{
# Stuff below not required
exit or return
}
do other stuff before relaying
}
Will this break, stop the processing of all branches with higher
index as the one being processed? From what I observe, I fear this is
the case.
Could I safely use return(1) (vs return which probably is return(0)
thus eq exit)? Or would the only safe option be to wrap the 'other
stuff' in an else statement?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________
