sr-users January 2025

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

37 participants
34 discussions

by Sergey Safarov

If TCP children are busy, Please correct me if I am wrong if the remote IP is not responding via TCP protocol, this leads to a timeout and this child is busy. If many remote endpoints are not reachable via TCP this can lead to the case when half or more children are by timeout operations. I think required to monitor how many children are busy. Is it possible to get such info using kamcmd utility, statistics module, or xprom module. Sergey

1 month

Crash on dialog_publish.

by satyaprakash ch

Hi, The kamailio version we are using is "5.7.4", We are facing a kamailio crash recently and it has generated the core-dump. Below is the backtrace for the coredump. Could you please assist with this crash. *Bachtrace:* #0 0x00007fa6b051748a in dialog_publish (state=0x7fa6b0519505 "terminated", ruri=0x7069734030783532, entity=0x7ffcdfb16510, peer=0x7ffcdfb16520, callid=0x7fa5b0527cb8, initiator=1, lifetime=10, localtag=0x0, remotetag=0x0, localtarget=0x7fa5b0527ce8, remotetarget=0x7ffcdfb16500, do_pubruri_localcheck=0, uuid=0x7fa5b0527d18) at dialog_publish.c:302 body = 0x0 uri = {s = 0x0, len = 0} publ = 0x0 size = 0 content_type = {s = 0x0, len = -1288318368} ruri_uri = {user = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, passwd = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, host = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, port = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, params = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, sip_params = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, headers = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, port_no = 0, proto = 0, type = ERROR_URI_T, flags = (unknown: 0), transport = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, ttl = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, user_param = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, maddr = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, method = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, lr = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, r2 = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, gr = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, transport_val = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, ttl_val = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, user_param_val = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, maddr_val = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, method_val = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, lr_val = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, r2_val = {s = 0x0, len = 0}, gr_val = {s = 0x0, len = 0}} __func__ = "dialog_publish" #1 0x00007fa6b0518f89 in dialog_publish_multi (state=0x7fa6b0519505 "terminated", ruris=0x7069734030783532, entity=0x7ffcdfb16510, peer=0x7ffcdfb16520, callid=0x7fa5b0527cb8, initiator=1, lifetime=10, localtag=0x0, remotetag=0x0, localtarget=0x7fa5b0527ce8, remotetarget=0x7ffcdfb16500, do_pubruri_localcheck=0, uuid=0x7fa5b0527d18) at dialog_publish.c:412 __func__ = "dialog_publish_multi" #2 0x00007fa6b0506944 in __dialog_sendpublish (dlg=0x7fa5b046a850, type=64, _params=0x7fa6b0437620 <params>) at pua_dialoginfo.c:402 tag = {s = 0x0, len = 0} uri = { s = 0x7fa5b0527d41 "sip:+1248XXXXXXX@10.XXX.X.Xm6ka0542f9v0lmjjc4npkamailio954739148rdb2847sip :XXXXXX.com:5060sip:521XXXx0;tgrp=51;trunk-context=198.X.XXX.XXX@10.XXX.XX.XX:5060padi-6761ad46-154e-1560padi\300\300\300\300", len = 29} identity_local = { s = 0x7fa5b0527d28 "sip:413XXXx0@10.XXX.X.XXsip :+1248XXXXXXXX@10.XXX.X.XXm6ka0542f9v0lmjjc4npkamailio954739148rdb2847sip :XXXXXX.com:5060sip:415XXXx0;tgrp=51;trunk-context=198.X.XXX.XXX@10.XXX.XX.XX:5060padi-6761ad46-154e-"..., len = 25} target = {s = 0x0, len = 0} dlginfo = 0x7fa5b0527c90 request = 0x7fa6b3361b58 __func__ = "__dialog_sendpublish" Thanks.

1 month

record_route() adding wrong sips URI when transport is missing (defaulting to UDP)

by Benoit Panizzon

Hi Gang A quick search via google did not reveal any useful hits. Kamailio 5.7.6 CPE (TLS) => SBC (UDP) => Registrar (UDP) => Core CPE uses a sips contact URI to register, no transport attribute! sips:315996608@172.29.255.11:5061 SBC uses Path functionality. Situation: Call to CPE I see the registrar adding this Record-Route: Record-Route: <sips:registrar-ip;lr;ftag=6159862378> The SBC is adding a r2=on Record-Route to indicate the change between UDP and TLS. The Route-Set received by the CPE then is: INVITE sips:315996608@172.29.255.11:5061 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sips:sbc-ip:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=6159862378> Record-Route: <sips:sbc-ip;r2=on;lr;ftag=6159862378> Record-Route: <sips:registrar-ip;lr;ftag=6159862378> Record-Route: <sip:core-ip;lr;ftag=6159862378> 180 Ringing req 100rel is making it back as the Via header look right. But when the remote side is sending a PRACK, is has to follow the Routeset which if I am not mistaking, is not making it back because because the CORE does not know how to send this via TLS to the Registrar. Core logging: prepare_new_uac(): can't fwd to af 2, proto 3 (no corresponding listening socket) IMHO already the 2nd Record-Route added by the Registrar should not contain a sips: URI but a sip: URI (reflecting the transport attribute not being present, defaulting to UDP) Is this a known issue? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 month

Guidance Required for Kamailio Load Balancer Behavior in Attended Transfer Scenarios

by Kotappa Gandudi

Dear Kamailio Team, I hope this email finds you well. I am currently working on a project where Kamailio is being utilized as a load balancer to distribute calls across multiple FreeSWITCH instances. I am using the round-robin technique for load distribution, and it is working perfectly for regular call scenarios. However, I am encountering an issue when handling attended transfer calls. Specifically, for a normal call, Kamailio assigns one FreeSWITCH instance, but during the attended transfer call, it assigns another FreeSWITCH instance. This behavior disrupts the continuity of the call handling. My requirement is for Kamailio to use the same FreeSWITCH instance for the entire call, including any attended transfers. I believe maintaining the same FreeSWITCH instance for the entire call flow would ensure consistency and avoid potential issues. Could you please guide me on how to configure Kamailio to achieve this behavior? I would greatly appreciate any suggestions, configurations, or modules that can help resolve this issue. Thank you for your time and assistance. Looking forward to your response. Best regards, Kotappa Y Gandudi

1 month

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2025