sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37519 discussions

panning for v3.2.2
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 31 Jan '12

31 Jan '12

Hello, I would like to package 3.2.2 on the same day with IRC devel meeting announced in the previous email (if is is happening this month) -- it is getting close to 2 months since v3.2.1. If you are aware of issues, report them on bug tracker to see what can be done before 3.2.1. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 2

xmlops/xpath access of multiple nodes
by Alex Balashov 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

Hi, I guess this is more of an xpath question than a Kamailio one, so forgive me. All the same, how does one deal with a document like this using $xml(...): <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <sheep> <lamb> ... </lamb> <lamb> ... </lamb> </sheep> Specifically, how do I access the second, third, Nth element with the same tag, but without knowledge of any unique identifying attributes? Is there a useful way to iterate through them in Kamailio route script? I would have thought something like this could work: $var(i) = 0; while(defined $xml(x=>xpath:/sheep/lamb[$var(i)])) { ... $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } However, obviously, that's not it. So what's the right way to do it? My desire is to buffer data from these nodes into an AVP array. As you might guess, it's a route set over which I need to serially fork. Thanks! -- Alex -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 260 Peachtree Street NW Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] save a Q850 cause reason from a reply
by Uri Shacked 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > thanks for the options. i will test it soon. > looks like a perfect solution. > > BR, > Uri >

1 0

Kamailio Crashing
by Ali Jawad 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

Hi I am running Kamailio and at times it just crashes, sometimes it happens once a day sometimes a few times a day, in debug mode it shows the following when it crashes http://pastebin.com/ZcQRnXmM GDB shows http://pastebin.com/02wVK0eZ GDB BT Shows http://pastebin.com/3TBAuQAp Please advice -- *Ali Jawad * *Information Systems Manager* *Splendor Telecom (www.splendor.net) Beirut, Lebanon Phone: +9611373725/ext 116 FAX: +9611375554*

2 4

alias problem
by Stoyan Mihaylov 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

My whole configuration is: [Sip clients] < = > Kamailio 3.2 <=> Asterisk servers (behind Kamailio) Asterisk servers have only local IP addresses, and I use t_relay instead of forward. Kamailio runs on same server as rtpproxy. Everything is fine if clients connect to Kamailio with its IP address - global, or if they are behind Kamailio with local address. When clients connect to Kamailio using sip.ourcompany.com, then call (video also) is OK, but ACK and BYE do not work. BYE receives not here (404), and ACK die somewhere. I forward BYE and ACK in case when src_ip==$td to Asterisk server. If one of clients use IP - then calls initiated from it are OK (BYE/ACK - are going correctly - to Asterisk and to other client also). But calls from other client have problems with BYE and ACK. To use sip.ourcompany.com - I put: alias=sip.ourcompany.com route[ACKBYE] { #!ifdef WITH_PSTN if (is_method("BYE|ACK")) { xlog("L_ALERT","AB $rm $sht(forw=>$ft) $td"); if(src_ip==$td){ #I have to rewrite du - messages loop in Kamailio, I store in $sht(forw=>$ft) $du which I use during INVITE. $du=$sht(forw=>$ft); route(RELAY); exit; } xlog("L_ALERT","ACK,Bye Not me"); } #!endif return; }

2 2

Open Source billing
by Abid Naseem 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

Looking for open source billing solution for Kamailio: 1) rating 2) client interface for cdr 3) admin interface Help needed. Thanks and keep inspiring! -abid Sent from my iPhone

3 4

exec_avp size limitation
by Gustavo Garcia Bernardo 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

Hi folks, I'm having problems with exec_avp because is truncating the output of the script executed. Looking at the code I see exec_avp is imposing a limit of MAX_URI_SIZE (1024) but I don't understand why. The limit should be the maximum size for an avp variable in my opinion. Regards, G. Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

2 1

memory leak fix on xcap_ auth.c
by laura testi 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

Hi Daniel, I'm sending you some memory leak fix we have found and fixed on modules/utils/xcap_ auth.c. The fixed memory leak is in pres_watcher_allowed (), and it is about the "xmlFreeDoc" that it's never called for the "xcap_tree" variable. We downloaded the source file from master branch and then we fixed it. You can find here the diff from original and new code and in attach both the original and the new files. diff -u a/modules/utils/xcap_auth.c b/modules/utils/xcap_auth.c --- a/modules/utils/xcap_auth.c +++ b/modules/utils/xcap_auth.c @@ -280,13 +280,15 @@ } node= get_rule_node(subs, xcap_tree); - if (node== NULL) + if (node== NULL){ + xmlFreeDoc(xcap_tree); return 0; - + } /* process actions */ actions_node = xmlNodeGetChildByName(node, "actions"); if (actions_node == NULL) { LM_DBG("actions_node NULL\n"); + xmlFreeDoc(xcap_tree); return 0; } LM_DBG("actions_node->name= %s\n", actions_node->name); @@ -294,6 +296,7 @@ sub_handling_node = xmlNodeGetChildByName(actions_node, "sub-handling"); if (sub_handling_node== NULL) { LM_DBG("sub_handling_node NULL\n"); + xmlFreeDoc(xcap_tree); return 0; } sub_handling = (char*)xmlNodeGetContent(sub_handling_node); @@ -302,6 +305,7 @@ if (sub_handling == NULL) { LM_ERR("Couldn't get sub-handling content\n"); + xmlFreeDoc(xcap_tree); return -1; } if (strncmp((char*)sub_handling, "block", 5) == 0) { @@ -325,10 +329,12 @@ else { LM_ERR("unknown subscription handling action\n"); xmlFree(sub_handling); + xmlFreeDoc(xcap_tree); return -1; } xmlFree(sub_handling); + xmlFreeDoc(xcap_tree); return 0; Kind Regards, laura

2 1

Kamailio TLS with intermediate CA certificates
by Daniel Pocock 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

I found that my TLS client was not happy because my server cert is signed by an intermediate root. A quick search in Google found other people mentioning the same problem, but no solution or documentation. I've had a quick look in the Kamailio source and I notice it is using the call: SSL_CTX_use_certificate_chain_file to load the certificate specified in tls.cfg with certificate=myserver.pem In practice, this means the intermediate certificates can be appended to myserver.pem and Kamailio will present them to the TLS client: Example: Trust heirarchy: trusted root - inter 1 - inter 2 - server.example.com.pem Construct the PEM file in this exact order: cat server.example.com.pem > chain-server.example.com.pem cat inter2.pem >> chain-server.example.com.pem cat inter1.pem >> chain-server.example.com.pem and then, in tls.cfg: certificate=chain-server.example.com.pem

4 7

Kamailio for NATted users with ICE and TURN
by Daniel Pocock 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

There are now a number of TURN implementations available: http://www.resiprocate.org/ReTurn_Overview http://turnserver.sourceforge.net/ and for many purposes TURN relays and ICE are much better than relying on NAT helper and rtpproxy When clients use ICE: - the client gets upset if Kamailio mangles the SDP to use rtpproxy - it is actually not necessary for the SDP to have addresses tweaked - because ICE deals with it anyway In practice, it still appears necessary for the registration server to deal with NATted contact addresses though Can anyone clarify how Kamailio should be configured for ICE clients? In other words, is it possible to have Kamailio dealing with NATted contact addresses, but not touching the SDP? To limit the scope of the question: - assume non-ICE clients do not need to be supported at all (just ignore them, although a nice cfg would scan all SDP and send a helpful error back if it sees a 192.168 address and no a=ice* attributes) - assume clients are connecting with TLS over TCP, so there is no risk that some intermediate device like a router is mangling the SIP headers or SDP

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users