sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37519 discussions

200 OK re transmission only on re-SUBSCRIBE
by Lewis Hutchinson 27 Jan '22

27 Jan '22

First of all I should start by saying this is my first post so go easy on me!! : ) and thank for everyone's efforts to share knowledge it has been invaluable for my kamailio learning. Build Details Version: kamailio 5.5.3 (x86_64/linux) Kamailio kemi python Scenario Relevant config def ksr_route_api_query(self, msg): KSR.log("info", "SUBSCRIBE API Query Starts") # Create new Transaction KSR.tm.t_newtran() async def main(): url = 'https://api.hidingtheurl.com/subscribe' payload = { "ruri": KSR.pv.get("$ru"), "from": KSR.pv.get("$fu"), "from_tag": KSR.pv.gete("$ft"), "to": KSR.pv.get("$tu"), "callid": KSR.pv.get("$ci"), "cseq": KSR.pv.get("$cs"), "contact": KSR.pv.gete("$ct"), "supported": KSR.pv.get("$hdr(Supported)"), "event": KSR.pv.get("$hdr(Event)"), "expires": KSR.pv.get("$hdr(Expires)"), "diversion": KSR.pv.get("$di"), "body": KSR.pv.get("$rb") } async with aiohttp.ClientSession() as session: async with session.post(url, json=payload) as response: if response.status == 0: KSR.xlog.xinfo(f"SUB Manager Timeout: {response.status}") KSR.tm.t_reply(408, "SUB Manager Timeout") elif response.status >= 500: KSR.xlog.xinfo(f"SUB Manager Down: {response.status}") KSR.tm.t_reply(500, "SUB Manager Down") elif response.status >= 400: KSR.xlog.xinfo(f"SUB Manager Error: {response.status}") KSR.tm.t_reply(400, "SUB Manager Error") else: if response.status == 200: KSR.xlog.xinfo(f"SUB Manager Success: {response.status}") KSR.tm.t_reply(200, "OK") KSR.log("info", "SUBSCRIBE API Query Ends") asyncio.run(main()) # API Query Ends Scenario Initial SUBSCRIBE >>> hits Kamailio >>> send payload in JSON to API get receive 200OK response from API and send a 200OK on to Device SUBSCRIBE --------> <------------ 200 OK After Subscription Expiry re-SUBSCRIBE >>> hits Kamailio >>> send payload in JSON to API get 200OK response from API and send a 200OK on to Device but also another 200OK a fraction of a second later... SUBSCRIBE --------> <------------ 200 OK <<<--------- 200 OK This happens for all following re-SUBSCRIBE's The 200 OK are identical, and it is a re transmission, but I can't work out why.. Relevant DEBUG is below Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: INFO: <script>: SUB Manager Success: 200 Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: app_python3 [apy_kemi.c:232]: sr_apy_kemi_exec_func_ex(): execution of method: t_reply Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: app_python3 [apy_kemi.c:287]: sr_apy_kemi_exec_func_ex(): params[2] for: t_reply are int-str: [200] [OK] Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1034]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7eff0cd4e828) id=2/11234 global id=2/11234 T start=0x7eff0918d7d8 Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1108]: t_check_msg(): T (0x7eff0918d7d8) already found for msg (0x7eff0cd4e828)! Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:162]: check_via_address(): (80.111.111.111, 80.111.111.111, 0) Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1763]: cleanup_uac_timers(): RETR/FR timers reset Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:637]: _reply_light(): reply sent out - buf=0x7eff0cd50938: SIP/2.0 200 OK#015#012Via:... shmem=0x7eff09190ca8: SIP/2.0 200 OK#015#012Via: Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:648]: _reply_light(): finished Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: app_python3 [apy_kemi.c:232]: sr_apy_kemi_exec_func_ex(): execution of method: t_precheck_trans Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: app_python3 [apy_kemi.c:232]: sr_apy_kemi_exec_func_ex(): execution of method: t_check_trans Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1034]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7eff0cd4e828) id=2/11234 global id=2/11234 T start=0x7eff0918d7d8 Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1108]: t_check_msg(): T (0x7eff0918d7d8) already found for msg (0x7eff0cd4e828)! Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1703]: t_retransmit_reply(): reply retransmitted. buf=0x7eff0cb18220: SIP/2.0 2..., shmem=0x7eff09190ca8: SIP/2.0 2 Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: app_python3 [apy_kemi.c:112]: sr_kemi_config_engine_python(): execution of route type 1 with no name returned 1 Jan 26 12:31:17 ip-172-20-46-39 kamailio[11234]: DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:514]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 38258 usec Everything works well as is but I want to clean up this issue or at least understand what is causing it. Lewis

2 6

Some problems with SIP TRACE
by Arnaud 27 Jan '22

27 Jan '22

Hi, I'm trying to use siptrace to getting copy of my SIP transactions, especially in TLS. Here's my configuration : *loadmodule "siptrace.so" modparam("siptrace", "trace_mode", 1) modparam("siptrace", "trace_to_database", 0) modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1) modparam("siptrace", "duplicate_uri", "sip:MY_IP:5065") modparam("siptrace", "trace_local_ip", "MY_IP:5061") modparam("siptrace", "hep_mode_on", 1) modparam("siptrace", "hep_version", 2) modparam("siptrace", "hep_capture_id", 1) modparam("siptrace", "trace_flag",22); * And in my Routing Logic : *request_route {* *sip_trace();setflag(22);* *(...)* But I didn't receive anything on my listening port 5065 according my TCPDUMP. Status confirm me siptrace is working : *root@debian:/# kamcmd siptrace.status checkEnabled* I think I made a mistake in the configuration, but I don't know where. My second question is when I try to use sip_trace_mode("t"); I getting : failed to find command sip_trace_mode. Is it in an other module ? Many thanks for your help. Regards, Arnaud

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 200, Issue 25
by surendra tiwari 27 Jan '22

27 Jan '22

Hi Aditya, There are 2 options to achieve this: Option-1 use below param in auth_db module and while doing authentication change table name to your table user_column (string) <https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/auth_db.html#auth_db.p.…> domain_column (string) <https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/auth_db.html#auth_db.p.…> password_column (string) <https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/auth_db.html#auth_db.p.…> Option-2 create a new http service that will connect to kamailio via evapi and will be responsible for authentication and location service. On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 16:31, <sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > Send sr-users mailing list submissions to > sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sr-users-owner(a)lists.kamailio.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Kamailio as a SIP registrar (Aditya Uppuluri) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:21:33 +0530 > From: Aditya Uppuluri <uppuluriaditya(a)gmail.com> > To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org > Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio as a SIP registrar > Message-ID: > <CAKWpYb= > 9EABvpmbPhvCyt-roQaOkiJnZSh17vVu6Wk26PiBbeg(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hello Team, > Thank you for the amazing product. I am a newbie to kamailio and currently > trying to use kamailio as a SIP Registrar (for a multidomain). Here is the > requirement > > 1. We already have a mysql database (name: VOIP) with a table named > VoipSubscribers which contains the userid, password and domain information > of all the users. > 2. We want the ability in kamailio to use the same VoipSubscribers table > for user registrations and also store the location information in the same > database (VOIP) > > May I know how to achieve this without altering the table schema? > Thank you in advance. > > Regards, > Aditya Uppuluri >

1 0

Kamailio as a SIP registrar
by Aditya Uppuluri 26 Jan '22

26 Jan '22

Hello Team, Thank you for the amazing product. I am a newbie to kamailio and currently trying to use kamailio as a SIP Registrar (for a multidomain). Here is the requirement 1. We already have a mysql database (name: VOIP) with a table named VoipSubscribers which contains the userid, password and domain information of all the users. 2. We want the ability in kamailio to use the same VoipSubscribers table for user registrations and also store the location information in the same database (VOIP) May I know how to achieve this without altering the table schema? Thank you in advance. Regards, Aditya Uppuluri

2 1

Append HF don't work in event_route
by Arnaud 24 Jan '22

24 Jan '22

Hello, I'm trying to connect kamailio to Microsoft Teams. Dispatch is correctly configured and sended. Following this tutorial : https://skalatan.de/en/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams, I added an Event_Route to add contact header to SIP OPTION from dispath to MS : event_route[tm:local-request] { xlog("*** tm:local-request *** "); if(is_method("OPTIONS") && $ru =~ "pstnhub.microsoft.com") { xlog("L_INFO", "Append new contact !\n"); append_hf("Contact: <sip:MY_SBC_NAME.COM:5061 ;transport=tls>\r\n"); } xlog("L_INFO", "Sent out tm request: $mb\n"); } When I check the log to see my sended frame, I don't see a contact header field : INFO: <script>: Append new contact ! INFO: <script>: Sent out tm request : OPTIONS sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS MY_SBC_NAME.COM:5061 ;branch=z9hG4bK4497.f3e5e754000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls> From: <sip:MY_SBC_NAME.COM.fr>;tag=a76e006ace3802951ed860e08df964af-7971 CSeq: 10 OPTIONS Call-ID: 2e1278ea77796160-9837@MY_SBC_IP Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: kamailio (5.2.1 (x86_64/linux)) According the documentation about textop, append_hf(txt[, hdr]) : This function can be used from REQUEST_ROUTE, ONREPLY_ROUTE, FAILURE_ROUTE, BRANCH_ROUTE. So my question is append HF can be used in Event_route ? Is there any other way to add contact header ? Regards, Arnaud

1 0

g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion 'hash_table != NULL' failed
by Muhammad Danish Moosa 23 Jan '22

23 Jan '22

Hi, I am running stress tests on kamalilio , at times i see this on screen (process:30959): GLib-CRITICAL **: 21:43:56.961: g_hash_table_insert_internal: assertion 'hash_table != NULL' failed version: kamailio 5.5.3 Kamailio does not crash and keeps accepting calls though. Is it anything alarming. -- Muhammad Danish Moosa " The core of mans' spirit comes from new experiences. "___ Christopher McCandless

1 0

dispatcher lb
by Gokan Atmaca 22 Jan '22

22 Jan '22

Hello I'm load balancing with Dispatcher. The call comes in but hangs up without picking up the phone. What could be the problem? The settings are as follows. dispatcher.list 1 sip:18.X.X.X.X:5060 0 0 maxload=20 1 sip:67.X.X.X.X:5060 0 0 maxload=20 # Dispatch requests route[DISPATCH] { # round robin dispatching on gateways group '1' if(!ds_select_dst("1", "4")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } xlog("L_DBG", "--- SCRIPT: going to <$ru> via <$du>\n"); t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } { NRSETS: 1 RECORDS: { SET: { ID: 1 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:X.X.X.X:5060 FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 0 ATTRS: { BODY: maxload=20 DUID: MAXLOAD: 20 WEIGHT: 0 RWEIGHT: 0 SOCKET: } LATENCY: { AVG: 4.130000 STD: 0.398000 EST: 4.006000 MAX: 6 TIMEOUT: 0 } } DEST: { URI: sip:X.X.X.X:5060 FLAGS: AP PRIORITY: 0 ATTRS: { BODY: maxload=20 DUID: MAXLOAD: 20 WEIGHT: 0 RWEIGHT: 0 SOCKET: } LATENCY: { AVG: 22.282000 STD: 2.345000 EST: 23.075000 MAX: 42 TIMEOUT: 0 } } } } } } -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀

2 3

Effect of GRUU on the behavior of loose_route()
by Denys Pozniak 21 Jan '22

21 Jan '22

Hello! I ask for help in explaining the different behavior of loose_route() function in two similar cases (depending on GRUU parameter on the end device). The call path goes through a series of Proxies: Proxy Registrar (use Path) -> Proxy Edge -> PhonerLite (GRUU on/off). If the GRUU parameter is enabled on the PhonerLite, then the in-dialog SIP ACK (on 200 OK/SDP) message is routed on the Proxy Edge successfully (loose_route() deletes Route and handle_ruri_alias() sets $du). When GRUU is disabled - loose_route() for some reason replaces RURI (but lr=on ?) and sets $du. The configuration of the [WITHINDLG] route section is similar to the default script. IP: 1.1.1.1 is the Proxy Registrar IP: 2.2.2.2 is the Proxy Edge IP: 3.3.3.3 is the Phone (Phoner Lite) Successful case (GRUU enabled): 2022/01/21 20:08:20.745859 1.1.1.1:5060 -> 2.2.2.2:5060 ACK sip:userid@2.2.2.2:5060;gr=009356C7-5A79-EC11-8468-538E88103B96;alias=3.3.3.3~5065~1 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1;branch=z9hG4bK0a34.0bcc52c86238bd3a73bd88712c562d10.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.60.27.126;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0a34.1bb19d987d7566fe74d300766284d73a.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.60.27.84:5080 ;received=10.60.27.84;branch=z9hG4bKkr2inaF~;rport=5080 From: "Denys VOIP" <sip:5009@1.1.1.1>;tag=41A6E617-61EB049F000008A2-86EEE700 To: <sip:userid@10.60.27.84>;tag=00fd16295b79ec118469538e88103b96 CSeq: 10 ACK Call-ID: 537f0686-f590-123a-ffb5-001dd8b71cb2_userid Route: <sip:2.2.2.2;lr=on;nat=yes;did=28c.4fa> Max-Forwards: 63 Contact: <sip:10.60.27.84:5080;transport=udp> Content-Length: 0 2022/01/21 20:08:20.746952 2.2.2.2:5060 -> 3.3.3.3:5065 ACK sip:userid@2.2.2.2:5060;gr=009356C7-5A79-EC11-8468-538E88103B96 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 2.2.2.2;branch=z9hG4bK0a34.2b5076a5473cc42d883bf38969aa7dcf.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0a34.0bcc52c86238bd3a73bd88712c562d10.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.60.27.126;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0a34.1bb19d987d7566fe74d300766284d73a.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.60.27.84:5080 ;received=10.60.27.84;branch=z9hG4bKkr2inaF~;rport=5080 From: "Denys VOIP" <sip:5009@1.1.1.1>;tag=41A6E617-61EB049F000008A2-86EEE700 To: <sip:userid@10.60.27.84>;tag=00fd16295b79ec118469538e88103b96 CSeq: 10 ACK Call-ID: 537f0686-f590-123a-ffb5-001dd8b71cb2_userid Max-Forwards: 62 Contact: <sip:10.60.27.84:5080;transport=udp> Content-Length: 0 DEBUG: 3(11755) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:85]: is_preloaded(): is_preloaded: No 3(11755) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:646]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 13==13 && [2.2.2.2] == [2.2.2.2] 3(11755) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:649]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 3(11755) DEBUG: <core> [core/forward.c:429]: check_self(): host (0: 2.2.2.2:5060) == me 3(11755) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:646]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 13==13 && [2.2.2.2] == [2.2.2.2] 3(11755) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:649]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 3(11755) DEBUG: <core> [core/forward.c:429]: check_self(): host (0: 2.2.2.2:5060) == me 3(11755) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:856]: after_loose(): Topmost route URI: 'sip:2.2.2.2;lr=on;nat=yes;did=28c.4fa' is me 3(11755) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:91]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header 3(11755) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:181]: find_next_route(): No next Route HF found 3(11755) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:886]: after_loose(): No next URI found 3(11755) DEBUG: rr [rr_cb.c:95]: run_rr_callbacks(): callback id 1 entered with <lr=on;nat=yes;did=28c.4fa> 3(11755) DEBUG: path [path.c:397]: path_rr_callback(): no received parameter in route header 3(11755) DEBUG: rr [rr_cb.c:95]: run_rr_callbacks(): callback id 0 entered with <lr=on;nat=yes;did=28c.4fa> 3(11755) DEBUG: nathelper [nathelper.c:1202]: handle_ruri_alias(): setting dst_uri to <sip:3.3.3.3:5065> 3(11755) DEBUG: nathelper [nathelper.c:1224]: handle_ruri_alias(): rewriting r-uri to <sip:userid@2.2.2.2:5060 ;gr=009356C7-5A79-EC11-8468-538E88103B96> Unsuccessful case (GRUU disabled): 2022/01/21 20:08:47.851170 1.1.1.1:5060 -> 2.2.2.2:5060 ACK sip:userid@2.2.2.2:5060;alias=3.3.3.3~5065~1 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1;branch=z9hG4bK110e.a47bb0e8f6d6d99a10ae36eb25d2f665.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.60.27.126;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK110e.4d82c337912ca1187474aa2474a7d563.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.60.27.84:5080 ;received=10.60.27.84;branch=z9hG4bK4bKmGaAy;rport=5080 From: "Denys VOIP" <sip:5009@1.1.1.1>;tag=0FBBBFFE-61EB04BB000A3B4F-86EEE700 To: <sip:userid@10.60.27.84>;tag=80dc2e395b79ec11846d538e88103b96 CSeq: 10 ACK Call-ID: 64957c76-f590-123a-ffb5-001dd8b71cb2_userid Route: <sip:2.2.2.2;lr=on;nat=yes;did=3f8.6a83> Max-Forwards: 63 Contact: <sip:10.60.27.84:5080;transport=udp> Content-Length: 0 2022/01/21 20:08:47.851963 2.2.2.2:5060 -> 2.2.2.2:5060 ACK sip:2.2.2.2;lr=on;nat=yes;did=3f8.6a83 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 2.2.2.2;branch=z9hG4bK110e.af605388ece54d48387c1de53615d894.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK110e.a47bb0e8f6d6d99a10ae36eb25d2f665.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.60.27.126;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK110e.4d82c337912ca1187474aa2474a7d563.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.60.27.84:5080 ;received=10.60.27.84;branch=z9hG4bK4bKmGaAy;rport=5080 From: "Denys VOIP" <sip:5009@1.1.1.1>;tag=0FBBBFFE-61EB04BB000A3B4F-86EEE700 To: <sip:userid@10.60.27.84>;tag=80dc2e395b79ec11846d538e88103b96 CSeq: 10 ACK Call-ID: 64957c76-f590-123a-ffb5-001dd8b71cb2_userid Max-Forwards: 62 Contact: <sip:10.60.27.84:5080;transport=udp> Content-Length: 0 DEBUG: 1(11753) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:85]: is_preloaded(): is_preloaded: No 1(11753) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:646]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 13==13 && [2.2.2.2] == [2.2.2.2] 1(11753) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:649]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 1(11753) DEBUG: <core> [core/forward.c:429]: check_self(): host (0: 2.2.2.2:5060) == me 1(11753) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:676]: after_strict(): Next hop: 'sip:2.2.2.2;lr=on;nat=yes;did=3f8.6a83' is loose router 1(11753) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:726]: after_strict(): The last route URI: 'sip:2.2.2.2;lr=on;nat=yes;did=3f8.6a83' 1(11753) DEBUG: rr [rr_cb.c:95]: run_rr_callbacks(): callback id 1 entered with <alias=3.3.3.3~5065~1> 1(11753) DEBUG: path [path.c:397]: path_rr_callback(): no received parameter in route header 1(11753) DEBUG: rr [rr_cb.c:95]: run_rr_callbacks(): callback id 0 entered with <alias=3.3.3.3~5065~1> 1(11753) DEBUG: rr [record.c:977]: add_rr_param(): rr_param_buf=<;did=3f8.6a83> 1(11753) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:123]: has_totag(): totag found 1(11753) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:123]: has_totag(): totag found 1(11753) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1329]: t_newtran(): msg (0x7efe343f4998) id=11/11753 global id=10/11753 T start=0xffffffffffffffff 1(11753) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:498]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=57361, isACK=1 1(11753) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:456]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed - via branch [z9hG4bK110e.a47bb0e8f6d6d99a10ae36eb25d2f665.0] 1(11753) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:675]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found 1(11753) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:286]: t_relay_to(): forwarding ACK statelessly -- BR, Denys Pozniak

1 0

Experiences with Kamailio on Debian 11 Bullseye
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

Hello, has anyone experienced issues with Kamailio running on Debian 11 Bullseye? It's now more than 2 months since Debian 11 release and I wonder if people started to migrate to it for production systems. So far I did only basic tests on it, although I have a Debian Testing that I used for compilation and simple tests during the past several months before Debian 11 release. If someone discovers issues or changes in behaviour with various libraries or applications/database servers, report them to the tracker to try to address them as soon as possible. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - Online Nov 08-11, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - Nov 22-25, 2021 (America Timezone) * https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/

8 14

Handling special characters - KEMI lua redis_ndb
by Muhammad Danish Moosa 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

Hi Guys, I am trying to do following code KSR.ndb_redis.redis_cmd("srvN", "SET var " .. testvar, "r"); it works fine but if testvar has special character like SPACE or % , it does not work. For example when testvar="asdsada%Dasda"; it starts considering %D as place holder and does not add key to redis (does not raise error as well) With Space I tried to use delimeters like "" or '' but none of them work. For now I have got it working through , search and replace but thats not a clean solution. Any suggestions? -- Muhammad Danish Moosa " The core of mans' spirit comes from new experiences. "___ Christopher McCandless

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users