sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

47 participants
37554 discussions

Auth_ephemeral module setup
by Anoop L 04 Feb '25

04 Feb '25

Hi, I'm trying to understand and setup Auth_ephemeral for authentication. My goal is to authenticate users dynamically using an web service for that I bumped into auth_ephemeral module. In the module how is a request made to the web service? Are username and password fetched from Pseudo-Variables variable? Is this module to be worked with xhttp module for http requests? Any help is much appreciated.

1 0

Auth_ephemeral Module Setup
by anoop96115＠outlook.com 04 Feb '25

04 Feb '25

1 0

Testing Kamailio IMS Modules with IPSec as P-CSCF
by Saeed Mogharian 03 Feb '25

03 Feb '25

Hi, I’m looking for suggestions on how to test Kamailio IMS modules, specifically for the IMS registration process over IPSec when Kamailio is configured as the P-CSCF node. Are there any scripts or IMS clients available that can help with this? Thanks in advance!

2 1

Kamailio 6.0 presentation at FOSDEM 2025
by Henning Westerholt 31 Jan '25

31 Jan '25

Hello, just a quick announcement, that tomorrow afternoon will be a presentation about Kamailio 6.0 at the FOSDEM conference in Brussels, Belgium [1]. Usually all the talks in this room are streamed online as well. I am happy also to meet during the conference to chat about Kamailio or other topics, just send me a (direct) message. Best regards, Henning [1] https://fosdem.org/2025/schedule/event/fosdem-2025-5978-kamailio-6-0-develo… -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>

1 0

Strange memory stats
by Barry Flanagan 30 Jan '25

30 Jan '25

Hi, I have a 5.8.4 runing on Bookworm that after a while reports very strange memory stats like this: shmem.fragments: '729' shmem.free_size: '18446744009887078560' shmem.max_used_size: '67043934736' shmem.real_used_size: '67043698528' shmem.total_size: '3221225472' shmem.used_size: '67034971568' The settings are: SHM_MEMORY=3072 PKG_MEMORY=256 The shmem.free_size and max_used/max_size seem quite wrong. The output of "mod.stats all shm" shows the below: - 'Module: jsonrpcs' - Total: 0 - 'Module: core' - Total: 7891296 - 'Module: rr' - Total: 0 - 'Module: dialog' - Total: 146144 - 'Module: permissions' - Total: 130672 - 'Module: auth' - Total: 0 - 'Module: topoh' - Total: 0 - 'Module: sl' - Total: 14048 - 'Module: siptrace' - Total: 79184 - 'Module: sqlops' - Total: 0 - 'Module: acc' - Total: 0 - 'Module: xlog' - Total: 0 - 'Module: dmq' - Total: 1520 - 'Module: avpops' - Total: 0 - 'Module: rtpengine' - Total: 69328 - 'Module: db_mysql' - Total: 0 - 'Module: geoip2' - Total: 32 - 'Module: pv' - Total: 0 - 'Module: registrar' - Total: 0 - 'Module: textops' - Total: 0 - 'Module: htable' - Total: 6375584 - 'Module: tsilo' - Total: 74048 - 'Module: usrloc' - Total: 554240 - 'Module: tm' - Total: 6812224 - 'Module: websocket' - Total: 2551536 - 'Module: pike' - Total: 6880 - 'Module: tls' - Total: 5462960 - 'Module: tmx' - Total: 21968 - 'Module: kex' - Total: 3536 - 'Module: cfgutils' - Total: 128 - 'Module: sipdump' - Total: 32 - 'Module: domain' - Total: 5920 - 'Module: dispatcher' - Total: 20144 Thanks! -Barry

2 8

Kamailio v6.0.0 Released - new major version is out
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Kamailio v6.0.0 is out – it comes with 5 new modules and important updates to the core components and existing modules. The increment of the first version number reflects several important updates, among them: multi-threaded option for UDP receiving, option for specifying a range of ports to listen to, support for expressions with variables for most of the module functions parameters, internal libraries are directly inked to the core, support to use cmake to compile and install Kamailio. You can read a bit more detailed release notes at: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/kamailio-v6.0-0-release-notes/ Many thanks to all developers and community members that made possible this release. v6.0.0 brings more flexibility and optimizations across many existing components and modules, new parameters, functions, variables and transformations. Enjoy Kamailio v6.0.0! Thank you for flying Kamailio! Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com Kamailio World Conference, May 12-13, 2025, Berlin -- kamailioworld.com

2 2

Releasing v5.8.5
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.8.5 (out of branch 5.8) on Thursday, Jan 23, 2025. If anyone is aware of issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in order to have a better chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com

1 2

MS Teams BYE routing
by Barry Flanagan 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

Hi all, I have a Teams gw working apart from one issue., In a call originated in Teams,. if the called party hangs up, the BYE is sent to api-du-b-euwe.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443 which does not work. This is taken from the Contact header of the ACK I presume. Here is the ACK to the 200 OK: 28/01/2025 17:08:26.560 +00:00: 52.114.75.24:53728 -> 100.100.198.241:5061 ACK sip:9000@teams.domain.com:5061;transport=tls;tps=atpsh-67990f01-8ed8-1 SIP/2.0 FROM: "Teams User" <sip:+35314375362@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;user=phone>;tag=c29cb7a79ddf40f9ba909f3f1034a770 TO: <sip:9000@teams.domain.com:5061>;user=phone;tag=as6e287620 CSEQ: 1 ACK CALL-ID: e49f7df631ee576286ecf159e81952fe MAX-FORWARDS: 70 VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.75.24:5061;branch=z9hG4bK46d28f33 CONTACT: <sip:api-du-b-euwe.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=0781e8a1-91e6-4f6a-bc4a-73d6890827d4;x-c=e49f7df631ee576286ecf159e81952fe/d/8/703117d8337e4975a8216a54f59035c2> CONTENT-LENGTH: 0 USER-AGENT: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2025.1.20.11 i.EUWE.7 ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY ..and here is the BYE. 28/01/2025 17:08:36.119 +00:00: 100.100.198.241:5060 -> 52.123.134.13:443 BYE sip:api-du-b-euwe.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=0781e8a1-91e6-4f6a-bc4a-73d6890827d4;x-c=e49f7df631ee576286ecf159e81952fe/d/8/703117d8337e4975a8216a54f59035c2 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:teams.domain.com:5061;transport=tls;ftag=as6e287620;lr;r2=on> Record-Route: <sip:100.100.198.241:5060;ftag=as6e287620;lr;r2=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 100.100.198.241;branch=z9hG4bKc89c.0c1cf04a771c30293432e5f1f59331c8.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 102.102.139.182:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK3c42c163 Max-Forwards: 69 From: <sip:9000@teams.domain.com:5061>;user=phone;tag=as6e287620 To: "Teams User"<sip:+35314375362@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;user=phone>;tag=c29cb7a79ddf40f9ba909f3f1034a770 Call-ID: e49f7df631ee576286ecf159e81952fe CSeq: 102 BYE Content-Length: 0 How can I get around this? Using a pretty standard WITHINDLG route. I am using topos but not manipulating the Contact header. Thanks! -Barry

4 8

RTPengine module - pause/resume recording
by Who AmI 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

Hi list, I have been looking at the recording daemon in RTPengine with Kamailio controlling this via rtpengine_manage() flags: "record-call=on" in the initial Invite, or 200OK based on direction. I tested and this works brilliantly for the full calls, but when looking at pause/resume the module documentation is bare and I am a bit confused. It looks like the ngcp docs and Opensips module docs (for RTPengine) describe the pause/resume as just another start/stop flag. Use case is simple, all calls are recorded, but we want the option to pause, then resume once any private or personal information exchange has completed. My question is also simple - Is this the recommended way to pause and then resume recordings or have I missed something? The Kamailio documentation doesn't explicitly say this ( https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/rtpengine.html#rtpengi…) so just looking for advice if this is the best route to go. Thanks, John.

2 2

Re: [sr-dev] Re: Branching 6.0 series
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

Hello, On 20.01.25 08:25, Daniel-Constantin Mierla via sr-dev wrote: > Hello, > > I think we should branch it on Wednesday, Jan 22, 2025, no matter on > what stage we are with cmake support. The old-Makefiles should be kept > anyhow (as they are or in a special folder with an easy way to recover > them), because there are many bits and pieces that can be discovered > later when more users. > > Because there were no many bugs reported to the C code specific to 6.0, > we can aim releasing on January 29, 2025, with old-Makefile still to be > used for tasks that are not yet covered by cmake. shall we still aim for releasing v6.0.0 on this upcoming Wednesday, January 29, 2025? We the old-Makefiles kept, it is doable, the wiki pages needs to be created for this release series, which I can do tomorrow, as I waited to see if how it should be the recommended method for compilation/installation. If the feeling is that we should wait, then probably the target date has to be shifted somewhere in the week starting on February 10, 2025, because Fosdem follows this weekend and then some countries have a week holiday break. If no other opinions and change of decision, the release will be done on Wednesday, with content using the old-Makefiles (to reuse existing tutorials) and reference to cmake variant when it is the case. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com Kamailio World Conference, May 12-13, 2025, Berlin -- kamailioworld.com

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users