sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37519 discussions

www.kamailio.org maintenance on 29th October 2020, 10:00 CET
by Henning Westerholt 29 Oct '20

29 Oct '20

Hello, there will be a short planned maintenance on www.kamailio.org<http://www.kamailio.org> on 29th October 2020 at 10:00 CET. Relevant services including main homepage and documentation wiki will be unavailable for about 10-15 minutes. Best regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>

1 1

Kamailio unresponsive with Dialog+DMQ
by Patrick Wakano 28 Oct '20

28 Oct '20

Hello list, Hope all are doing well! We are running load tests in our Kamailio server, that is just making inbound and outbound calls and eventually (there is no identified pattern) Kamailio freezes and of course all calls start to fail. It does not crash, it just stops responding and it has to be killed -9. When this happens, SIP messages are not processed, dmq keepalive fails (so the other node reports as down), dialog KA are not sent, but Registrations from UAC seem to still go out (logs from local_route are seen). We don't have a high amount of cps, it is max 3 or 4 per sec, and it gets around 1900 active calls. We are now using Kamailio 5.2.8 installed from the repo on a CentOS7 server. Dialog has KA active and DMQ (with 2 workers) is being used on an active-active instance. >From investigation using GDB as pasted below, I can see UDP workers are stuck on a lock either on a callback from t_relay... #0 0x00007ffb74e9bbf9 in syscall () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffb2b1bce08 in futex_get (lock=0x7ffb35217b90) at ../../core/futexlock.h:108 #2 0x00007ffb2b1bec44 in bcast_dmq_message1 (peer=0x7ffb35e8bf38, body=0x7fff2e95ffb0, except=0x0, resp_cback=0x7ffb2a8a0ab0 <dlg_dmq_resp_callback>, max_forwards=1, content_type=0x7ffb2a8a0a70 <dlg_dmq_content_type>, incl_inactive=0) at dmq_funcs.c:156 #3 0x00007ffb2b1bf46b in bcast_dmq_message (peer=0x7ffb35e8bf38, body=0x7fff2e95ffb0, except=0x0, resp_cback=0x7ffb2a8a0ab0 <dlg_dmq_resp_callback>, max_forwards=1, content_type=0x7ffb2a8a0a70 <dlg_dmq_content_type>) at dmq_funcs.c:188 #4 0x00007ffb2a6448fa in dlg_dmq_send (body=0x7fff2e95ffb0, node=0x0) at dlg_dmq.c:88 #5 0x00007ffb2a64da5d in dlg_dmq_replicate_action (action=DLG_DMQ_UPDATE, dlg=0x7ffb362ea3c8, needlock=1, node=0x0) at dlg_dmq.c:628 #6 0x00007ffb2a61f28e in dlg_on_send (t=0x7ffb36c98120, type=16, param=0x7fff2e9601e0) at dlg_handlers.c:739 #7 0x00007ffb2ef285b6 in run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0x7ffb36c98198, type=16, trans=0x7ffb36c98120, params=0x7fff2e9601e0) at t_hooks.c:260 #8 0x00007ffb2ef286d0 in run_trans_callbacks (type=16, trans=0x7ffb36c98120, req=0x7ffb742f27e0, rpl=0x0, code=-1) at t_hooks.c:287 #9 0x00007ffb2ef38ac1 in prepare_new_uac (t=0x7ffb36c98120, i_req=0x7ffb742f27e0, branch=0, uri=0x7fff2e9603e0, path=0x7fff2e9603c0, next_hop=0x7ffb742f2a58, fsocket=0x7ffb73e3e968, snd_flags=..., fproto=0, flags=2, instance=0x7fff2e9603b0, ruid=0x7fff2e9603a0, location_ua=0x7fff2e960390) at t_fwd.c:381 #10 0x00007ffb2ef3d02d in add_uac (t=0x7ffb36c98120, request=0x7ffb742f27e0, uri=0x7ffb742f2a58, next_hop=0x7ffb742f2a58, path=0x7ffb742f2e20, proxy=0x0, fsocket=0x7ffb73e3e968, snd_flags=..., proto=0, flags=2, instance=0x7ffb742f2e30, ruid=0x7ffb742f2e48, location_ua=0x7ffb742f2e58) at t_fwd.c:811 #11 0x00007ffb2ef4535a in t_forward_nonack (t=0x7ffb36c98120, p_msg=0x7ffb742f27e0, proxy=0x0, proto=0) at t_fwd.c:1699 #12 0x00007ffb2ef20505 in t_relay_to (p_msg=0x7ffb742f27e0, proxy=0x0, proto=0, replicate=0) at t_funcs.c:334 or loose_route... #0 0x00007ffb74e9bbf9 in syscall () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffb2b1bce08 in futex_get (lock=0x7ffb35217b90) at ../../core/futexlock.h:108 #2 0x00007ffb2b1bec44 in bcast_dmq_message1 (peer=0x7ffb35e8bf38, body=0x7fff2e9629d0, except=0x0, resp_cback=0x7ffb2a8a0ab0 <dlg_dmq_resp_callback>, max_forwards=1, content_type=0x7ffb2a8a0a70 <dlg_dmq_content_type>, incl_inactive=0) at dmq_funcs.c:156 #3 0x00007ffb2b1bf46b in bcast_dmq_message (peer=0x7ffb35e8bf38, body=0x7fff2e9629d0, except=0x0, resp_cback=0x7ffb2a8a0ab0 <dlg_dmq_resp_callback>, max_forwards=1, content_type=0x7ffb2a8a0a70 <dlg_dmq_content_type>) at dmq_funcs.c:188 #4 0x00007ffb2a6448fa in dlg_dmq_send (body=0x7fff2e9629d0, node=0x0) at dlg_dmq.c:88 #5 0x00007ffb2a64da5d in dlg_dmq_replicate_action (action=DLG_DMQ_STATE, dlg=0x7ffb363e0c10, needlock=0, node=0x0) at dlg_dmq.c:628 #6 0x00007ffb2a62b3bf in dlg_onroute (req=0x7ffb742f11d0, route_params=0x7fff2e962ce0, param=0x0) at dlg_handlers.c:1538 #7 0x00007ffb2e7db203 in run_rr_callbacks (req=0x7ffb742f11d0, rr_param=0x7fff2e962d80) at rr_cb.c:96 #8 0x00007ffb2e7eb2f9 in after_loose (_m=0x7ffb742f11d0, preloaded=0) at loose.c:945 #9 0x00007ffb2e7eb990 in loose_route (_m=0x7ffb742f11d0) at loose.c:979 or t_check_trans: #0 0x00007ffb74e9bbf9 in syscall () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffb2a5ea9c6 in futex_get (lock=0x7ffb35e78804) at ../../core/futexlock.h:108 #2 0x00007ffb2a5f1c46 in dlg_lookup_mode (h_entry=1609, h_id=59882, lmode=0) at dlg_hash.c:709 #3 0x00007ffb2a5f27aa in dlg_get_by_iuid (diuid=0x7ffb36326bd0) at dlg_hash.c:777 #4 0x00007ffb2a61ba1d in dlg_onreply (t=0x7ffb36952988, type=2, param=0x7fff2e963bf0) at dlg_handlers.c:437 #5 0x00007ffb2ef285b6 in run_trans_callbacks_internal (cb_lst=0x7ffb36952a00, type=2, trans=0x7ffb36952988, params=0x7fff2e963bf0) at t_hooks .c:260 #6 0x00007ffb2ef286d0 in run_trans_callbacks (type=2, trans=0x7ffb36952988, req=0x7ffb3675c360, rpl=0x7ffb742f1930, code=200) at t_hooks.c:28 7 #7 0x00007ffb2ee7037f in t_reply_matching (p_msg=0x7ffb742f1930, p_branch=0x7fff2e963ebc) at t_lookup.c:997 #8 0x00007ffb2ee725e4 in t_check_msg (p_msg=0x7ffb742f1930, param_branch=0x7fff2e963ebc) at t_lookup.c:1101 #9 0x00007ffb2eee44c7 in t_check_trans (msg=0x7ffb742f1930) at tm.c:2351 And the DMQ workers are here: #0 0x00007ffb74e9bbf9 in syscall () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffb2b1d6c81 in futex_get (lock=0x7ffb35217c34) at ../../core/futexlock.h:108 #2 0x00007ffb2b1d7c3a in worker_loop (id=1) at worker.c:86 #3 0x00007ffb2b1d5d35 in child_init (rank=0) at dmq.c:300 Currently I will not be able to upgrade to latest 5.4 version to try to reproduce the error and since 5.2.8 has already reached end-of-life, maybe is there anything I can do on the configuration to avoid such condition? Any ideas are welcome! Kind regards, Patrick Wakano

3 6

Kamailio v5.4.2 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 27 Oct '20

27 Oct '20

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.4.2 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.4, that includes fixes since the release of v5.4.1. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.4.x. Deployments running previous v5.4.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.4.1. For more details about version 5.4.2 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2020/10/kamailio-v5-4-2-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

Releasing Kamailio v5.4.2
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 27 Oct '20

27 Oct '20

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.4.2 sometime next week, likely on Tuesday, October 27, 2020. This is the usual heads up notification to see if anyone is aware of issues not yet reported to bug tracker and if yes, do it as soon as possible to give them a chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

1 1

KEMI and Native mixing
by Marcin Kowalczyk 26 Oct '20

26 Oct '20

Hi, Is it possible to mix both KEMI (lua) and Native configs in one kamailio instance? So some blocks are called from native script and some others from KEMI (lua)? Marcin

6 5

Kamailio-5.x and Asterisk16.X Integration Walkthrough Videos or Wikis
by Lorem Ipsum 26 Oct '20

26 Oct '20

Hi there, After reading about Kamailio, i like this project but i am having trouble finding the wikis or step by step guide to successfully integrate asterisk with kamailio for simple use case where phones register to the asterisk pbx via kamailio and make/receive calls to ITSP, there is no proper documentation on 2 products integration, really appreciated your guidance and if somebody could provide me the step by step guide. Looking forward to the guides.

2 1

I want to write function in group module but i could not
by ahmed moghazy 25 Oct '20

25 Oct '20

I have 2 function first If(is_user_in(“Request-URI”, ”ld”)){ ..... } So i dont know what to do , second If(get_user_group(“Request-URI”, ”$avp(i:10)”){ ... } I put users in 2 groups but they could call each others but i dont want that . Any help please , Thank you.

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Load balance on HA scenario
by Yufei Tao 22 Oct '20

22 Oct '20

Hi Duarte, I'm not sure if your situation is more complicated than mine. I have two dispatcher nodes in the HA setup, with real IPs say IPa, IPb. They share a floating/virtual IP, let's call it VIP. Both nodes listen to the VIP (not its real IP), and use the VIP as the dispatcher's socket. In this case the master node which has the VIP can always send OPTIONS pings fine. My problem was with the backup node, which doesn't have the VIP so fails to send OPTIONS pings. Joel Serrano gave a good suggestion: both nodes start up with polling disabled, and only when a node turns master it enables the polling. This has solved my problem. Cheers, Yufei

1 0

Incoming DID calls routing to subscriber
by Jose N Figueroa 22 Oct '20

22 Oct '20

Hello everybody, I'm trying to route incoming calls to kamailio with specific subscriber but I can't make it working. The complete scenario is: SoftSwith -> kamailio 5.3 -> zoiper What i'm trying to do is to receive a call into the zoiper when I dial specific DID which is already coming into the kamailio. It goes until the routing from kamilio to the subscriber account but it keeps in INVITE command, no response from the subscriber. Any help would be great! This is what I've been trying but no luck yet: if($rdir(name)=="downstream") { xlog("DID request was incoming call, called number: $rU caller_id: $fU and source_ip $si \n"); $sht(rtpProxy=>mip_$ci)=1; # We should take the called_number as username in table # Also validate if the number has active that DID, balance if needed, etc. # route(validate_customer); # I know, hardcoded for testing sql_xquery("ca", "select * from location where username = 1212 ", "ra"); $avp(location_addr) = $xavp(ra=>received); xlog("DID did_incoming location is $xavp(ra=>received) \n"); # Validate SIP OK #setflag(SIP_IP_OK); #$rU=$avp(dnis); #$rd=$avp(identity); #$rp=$avp(port); # uac_replace_to($xavp(ra=>contact)); uac_replace_to("sip:1212@voip.x.net:5060"); # $ru = $var(duri); $ru=$xavp(ra=>contact); $ru="sip:1212@voip.x.net:5060"; route(RELAY); # t_on_failure("dst_failure"); # t_on_reply("dst_reply"); if(!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); exit; } exit; } -- Regards, Jose N Figueroa

3 3

Load balance on HA scenario
by Duarte Rocha 21 Oct '20

21 Oct '20

Greetings, I have two machines with Kamailio in a HA setup with replicated DB. For simplicity let's say each machine has one HA IP and that IP can jump to the other machine in case something happens (kamailio stopping, etc). I'm using Dispatcher with load balance configuration. I have Dispatcher configured so that each peer has one instance for socket with HA IP 1 and HA IP 2. In order for this to work correctly on the load balance scenario I must disable via RPC command the peer which has the socket that doesn't belong to the machine. I also must do it every time the IP jumps back and forth, which adds complexety to my system. Does Dispatcher has any sort of help on this? It could not include peers with sockets IPs that don't belong to the machine in the destination set, for example. Is this possible? I could also work with failover support but i would rather avoid having so many failovers. Best Regards,A

3 8

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users