sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37517 discussions

Kamailio Asterisk integration with docker DNS Problem
by Amir 15 Jul '19

15 Jul '19

Hi I have created a kamailio container with docker and two asterisk container And this is my dispatcher list: *1 sip:asterisk:50601 sip:asterisk2:5060* and this is my both asterisk SIP.conf *[Kamailio]host=kamailioport=5060insecure=invitetype=friendcontext=from-internal* The problem is that I use User-defined networks which has its own DNS when a container starts a dns record would be set If I start a kamailio first then start two asterisks the asterisk works fine because the name "kamailio" has been set in docker dns but I should restart the kamailio because at startup It could not resolve astersik dns records after the everything works fine but if the any of the asterisk instances crash/stop kamailio can not detect that because a dns record would not be available: *17(22) ERROR: <core> [core/resolve.c:1684]: sip_hostport2su(): could not resolve hostname: "asterisk2"17(22) ERROR: tm [ut.h:309]: uri2dst2(): failed to resolve "asterisk2"17(22) ERROR: tm [uac.c:452]: t_uac_prepare(): no socket found17(22) ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3110]: ds_ping_set(): unable to ping [sip:asterisk2:5060]* It is kind of loop , I think maybe I can fix asterisk problem with asterisk realtime and set the sip.conf in database. anyone has any suggestion for this problem?

8 14

Wrong $rm value
by Alexandru Covalschi 14 Jul '19

14 Jul '19

Hello list, I use kamailio 5.2.3 from repo's on stretch in docker. I use python KEMI + async and encountered weird behaviour: after t_continue $rm shows OPTIONS instead of REGISTER/INVITE. I wonder if that's correct behaviour, because for me it looks like a bug. Repeating is easy - just check $rm after t_continue. ________________________________ Regards, Alexandru Covalschi VoIP Engineer and System Administrator tel: +37367367850

1 2

Check if an INVITE comes from uac_reg endpoint
by Diogo Hartmann 14 Jul '19

14 Jul '19

Hello Kamailio experts, We were already able to register correctly at a SIP Provider using uacreg table. Now, we would like to validate inbound calls coming from this registered provider, sending them to a specific dispatcher group. I tried reading the uac module docs, found *uac_reg_lookup* function, but i'm not sure if that's we need. Could someone please help me to understand if UAC has a function to do that, or if we need to make some? Thanks!!

3 4

kamailio as ICSCF connection with FHoss
by Maryam Baghdadi 14 Jul '19

14 Jul '19

hello, I use Kamailio as my Icscf in IMS network . after receiving Invite Request from SCSCF to ICSCF‌, a LIR request sent from ICSCF to FHoss. User_Unknown response received in all states. I checked every thing carefully , users are registered and defined in HSS and every configuration done . What's wrong? is it possible that icscf has problem? or it can be FHoss bug?

4 14

call stuck and disconnect in kamailio
by Gaurav Bmotra 13 Jul '19

13 Jul '19

hi i m using kamailio 5.1.2 with ubuntu 18.4 LTS , and rtpproxy (Basic version: 20040107 ) we are using it for video calling everything is working fine but call get stuck after about 2 min and disconnect plz help -- *Regards:* Gaurav Kumar

2 3

Long distance rtpengine communication
by Koray Vatansever 12 Jul '19

12 Jul '19

Hi all, We have kamailio servers which communicate with the geographically distributed rtpengine servers. Sometimes udp packets are lost or delayed between kamailio and rtpengine. And this causes call drops... Since rtpengine communication is synchronized and tcp worker processes are blocked, I couldn't set higher timeout values and more retry count. Are there any suggestions to overcome this problem? Thanks, Koray

2 1

Variables for P-Called-Party-ID Header
by Benjamin Tietz 12 Jul '19

12 Jul '19

Hi, I have some INVITES where the called number is in the P-Called-Party-ID header: P-Called-Party-ID: <sip:+123456789@sip-trunk.example.com;user=phone> Is there any function or variable where the user is stored or made available? In this case +123456789 Thanks, Benjamin

2 3

SIP URI Evaluation and Forwarding
by Ronald Hartmann 12 Jul '19

12 Jul '19

Good Day List, I am very new to Kamailio and trying to understand at 10,000 feet how it may be able to be used. I was wondering if the following Scenario would be possible and if so what modules would accomplish this aspect. (Any URLs for further reading would be appreciated) Scenario: Given 1) SoftPhones will register as follows sip uri, user(a)subdomain.myvoipserver.com 2) The following users are authorized to connect (this would be stored in a config file etc): 1001,1003,1007 are valid users for apples.myvoipserver.com 1001,2213,5817 are valid users for oranges.myvoipserver.com Is it possible for Kamailio to perform the following evaluation and then take the appropriate steps: If [domain is apples.myvoipserver.com AND user portion is 1001] then Forward/Proxy the SIP/RTP packets to Asterisk server responsible for registration and audio for the domain apples.myvoipserver.com Else if [domain is oranges.myvoipserver.com AND user portion is 2213] then Forward/Proxy the SIP/RTP packets to Asterisk server responsible for registration and audio for the domain oranges.myvoipserver.com Else Silently Drop packets etc. given the above evaluation rules, a user who tries to register as 1001(a)apples.myvoipserver.com would be granted access and their SIP Packets and subsequent RTP would be forwarded to the asterisk server at apples.myvoipserver.com, where said server would take care of the Registration, and any subsequent calls, subscriptions, Options etc. 1004@ apples.myvoipserver.com Would not match the authorized list for apples.myvoipserver.com (1001,1003,1007), therefore this registration attempt would be silently dropped 2213(a)apples.myvoipserver.com would be granted access and their SIP Packets and subsequent RTP would be forwarded to the asterisk server at oranges.myvoipserver.com, where said server would take care of the Registration, and any subsequent calls, subscriptions, Options etc. Thanks for any information to assist me in understanding how this would work. ~ron

3 2

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio warning
by Henning Westerholt 10 Jul '19

10 Jul '19

Hello Ali, (please keep the sr-users list in CC, that other people can also participate) Remove the “-D” from your Kamailio command line – then the warning will disappear. This is also necessary because you want to have Kamailio listen on several addresses. If you want to test it more in a production like setting, you should also remove the “-E” from the command line. You will find the logging in your system log then. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services From: ali mahfouz <arm037(a)usal.edu.lb> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 11:54 AM To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio warning Dear Mr.Henning, I am working on high availability on two Kamailio servers connected to the database using keepalived and when I am testing Kamailio I got this issue and I have no idea about fixing it i am trying to see by this command kamailio -E -D -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg 0(16101) INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:74]: sctp_core_check_support(): SCTP API not enabled - if you want to use it, load sctp module Listening on udp: 10.10.10.20:5060<http://10.10.10.20:5060> udp: 10.10.10.3:5060<http://10.10.10.3:5060> tcp: 10.10.10.20:5060<http://10.10.10.20:5060> tcp: 10.10.10.3:5060<http://10.10.10.3:5060> Aliases: tcp: 10.10.10.3:5060<http://10.10.10.3:5060> tcp: 10.10.10.20:5060<http://10.10.10.20:5060> udp: 10.10.10.3:5060<http://10.10.10.3:5060> udp: 10.10.10.20:5060<http://10.10.10.20:5060> *: sip.domain.local:* WARNING: no fork mode and more than one listen address found (will use only the first one) 0(16101) INFO: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4721]: init_tcp(): using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) 0(16101) INFO: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_sock.c:197]: jsonrpc_dgram_mod_init(): the socket /var/run/kamailio/kamailio_rpc.sock already exists, trying to delete it... 0(16101) INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:52]: ob_load_api(): unable to import bind_ob - maybe module is not loaded 0(16101) INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:177]: mod_init(): outbound module not available 0(16101) INFO: <core> [main.c:2669]: main(): processes (at least): 16 - shm size: 67108864 - pkg size: 8388608 0(16101) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:153]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 0(16101) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:205]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 0(16101) WARNING: <core> [main.c:1347]: main_loop(): using only the first listen address (no fork) 6(16131) INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:214]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method (config) 5(16130) INFO: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_sock.c:443]: jsonrpc_dgram_process(): a new child 0/16130 ^C 6(16131) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 5(16130) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 1(16126) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 0(16101) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 16131 exited normally, status= 3(16128) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 0 0(16101) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 16126 exited normally, status= 4(16129) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 0 0(16101) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 16128 exited normally, status=0 0(16101) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 16129 exited normally, status=0 0(16101) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 16130 exited normally, status=0 0(16101) INFO: <core> [main.c:778]: handle_sigs(): dont_fork turned on, living on 0(16101) INFO: <core> [main.c:772]: handle_sigs(): SIGCHLD received, but no child has stopped, ignoring it 0(16101) NOTICE: <core> [main.c:709]: handle_sigs(): Thank you for flying kamailio!!! 2(16127) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received 0(16101) INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not initialized Please help thank you for giving time from your time On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 12:40 PM Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de<mailto:hw@skalatan.de>> wrote: Hello Ali, the first warning is related about the starting mode of Kamailio. You should not start it with “no forking mode” if you want to get rid of it. Have a look to your command line parameters: “-D” is the one to change. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>> On Behalf Of ali mahfouz Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2019 8:46 AM To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; sr-users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users-request@lists.kamailio.org>; sr-users-owner(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users-owner@lists.kamailio.org> Subject: [SR-Users] kamailio warning WARNING: no fork mode and more than one listen address found (will use only the first one) 0(8777) INFO: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4721]: init_tcp(): using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) 0(8777) INFO: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_sock.c:197]: jsonrpc_dgram_mod_init(): the socket /var/run/kamailio/kamailio_rpc.sock already exists, trying to delete it... 0(8777) INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:52]: ob_load_api(): unable to import bind_ob - maybe module is not loaded 0(8777) INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:177]: mod_init(): outbound module not available 0(8777) INFO: <core> [main.c:2669]: main(): processes (at least): 16 - shm size: 67108864 - pkg size: 8388608 0(8777) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:153]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 0(8777) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:205]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 0(8777) WARNING: <core> [main.c:1347]: main_loop(): using only the first listen address (no fork) 5(8782) INFO: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_sock.c:443]: jsonrpc_dgram_process(): a new child 0/8782 6(8783) INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:214]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method (config) ^C 6(8783) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 5(8782) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 4(8781) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 3(8780) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 1(8778) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 2 received 0(8777) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 8782 exited normally, status=0 0(8777) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 8778 exited normally, status=0 0(8777) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 8781 exited normally, status=0 0(8777) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 8783 exited normally, status=0 0(8777) ALERT: <core> [main.c:751]: handle_sigs(): child process 8780 exited normally, status=0 0(8777) INFO: <core> [main.c:778]: handle_sigs(): dont_fork turned on, living on 0(8777) INFO: <core> [main.c:772]: handle_sigs(): SIGCHLD received, but no child has stopped, ignoring it 0(8777) NOTICE: <core> [main.c:709]: handle_sigs(): Thank you for flying kamailio!!! 2(8779) INFO: <core> [main.c:836]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received 0(8777) INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not initialized

3 3

(no subject)
by Ilie Soltanici 10 Jul '19

10 Jul '19

Hello, Could someone help me to set a variable as a string in Kamailio? At the moment i'm using the following statement: *$var(account)=$(au{s.substr,0,8}); * *xlogl("L_INFO", "[1234] Account: $var(* *account* *)\n");* which is working fine, but i need to change it into: *$var(account)=$(au{s.select,0,-}{s.toupper})-$(au{s.select,1,-});* By doing this I'm getting the error: *[core/rvalue.c:1007]: rval_get_int(): automatic string to int conversion for "AT" failed[core/rvalue.c:1912]: rval_expr_eval_int(): rval expression conversion to int failed (729,30-729,59)* I tried also: *$var(account)="" + "$(au{s.select,0,-}{s.toupper})-$(au{s.select,1,-})";* But, then I'm getting: *Account = $(au{s.select,0,-}{s.toupper})-$(au{s.select,1,-})* instead of the value. What is the correct way to set it? Thank you.

2 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users