sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

50 participants
37557 discussions

error in tls configuration in kamailio 5.1.3
by Narasimhaiah, Vinod Maralenahalli 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hi, I upgraded kamailio 4.4.2 to kamailio5.1.3 and i am getting this error *"Unable to load certificate file '/etc/kamailio/kamailio-selfsigned.pem",* kamilio 4.4.2 does not need the ssl file, but kamailio 5.1.3 need ssl file, what changes required in kamailio 5.1.3 to run with tls. Please help me in resolving this issue. Thank you vinod.M.N -- To download the app, click: iOS <http://goo.gl/ZJx3y1> | Android <http://goo.gl/G1ehjZ> -- ***This transmission contains information that is confidential and proprietary of Kirusa Inc.,its affiliates and/or its partners and customers. This information is intended to be shared only with the recipient of this e-mail who is bound by confidentiality. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete the e-mail and notify the sender by return e-mail.***

4 4

Upgrade issue with old Kamailio 3.0.3 in table rls_presentity
by Kristijan Vrban 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hi, i try a upgrade from old 3.0.3 Kamailio mysql db. Got stuck with update the structure : ALTER TABLE rls_presentity MODIFY callid VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL;ALTER TABLE rls_presentity MODIFY contact VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL; found on: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/upgrade/3.1.x-to-3.2.0 But this two table does not exist? See also table definition at: https://kamailio.org/docs/db-tables/kamailio-db-3.1.x.html#GEN-DB-RLS-PRESE… I reckon it is safe to skip this to tables? Kristijan

2 4

31 May '18

Hi, https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/start?do=register Is not working. You get a empty page here. Kristijan

2 2

Sharing static variables in external library across child proceses
by User 721 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hi, I am adding a kamailio module that references an external C library that maintains a hashtable in global scope. I am wondering what practice I should follow so that: - This hashtable (which I don't control directly) is shared by all child processes - The hashtable is changed by one child process at a time Thanks in advance

2 1

PIKE module
by Robert Barrera 31 May '18

31 May '18

Good morning! We operate a VoIP platform and are interested in integrating the PIKE module. Is it possible for someone to assist us to discuss how this can be done and our options? Thank you logo_nop Robert Barrera 305-663-8989 305-600-4786 fax info(a)myrealmobile.com Complete Business PBX phone systems and Nationwide wireless! REAL Mobile does it!

2 1

sip_msg structure and memory free
by Konstantin Polyakov 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hello All, There is a structure sip_msg which is passed into a module and represents a received sip message. It contains number of pointers to hdr_field members. In its turn hdr_field contains member void* parsed In the sanity module we assign to parsed member a pointer to newly allocated memory and we don't free that memory at the end. Do we need to free explicitly or this memory will be deallocated later together with sip_msg ? In other words is it memory leak or not? Best regards, Konstantin

2 1

General Kamailio with Asterisk (or another PBX) Opinion
by Wilkins, Steve 30 May '18

30 May '18

HI All, I am curious, for those of you who use Kamailio with Asterisk or another PBX. Who forwards Registrations to Asterisk or PBX, and who lets Kamailio maintain Registrations? Thanks All!

4 3

send CANCEL to caller after hitting fr_inv_timeout
by Sergiu Pojoga 29 May '18

29 May '18

TM's noisy_ctimer=1 seems to take care of sending a CANCEL to the callee, but it eludes me which tm param makes a CANCEL to be sent to caller as well? Caller gets a '408 Request Timeout' only, which in my case doesn't effectively terminate a call for the calling party. Merci.

1 0

INFO: stun_parse_header: incomplete header of STUN message
by Pan Christensen 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hello! After proxying a REGISTER from a WebRTC client to our SIP backend, the backend starts sending keepalives. Every 30 seconds I get a log entry in Kamailio saying: "INFO: stun [kam_stun.c:169]: stun_parse_header(): INFO: stun_parse_header: incomplete header of STUN message". Here's one such packet: No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 1 0.000000 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy UDP 60 5060 ? 15060 Len=4 Frame 1: 60 bytes on wire (480 bits), 60 bytes captured (480 bits) Ethernet II, Src: JuniperN_4f:3f:f0 (40:a6:77:4f:3f:f0), Dst: 02:81:64:58:cf:d1 (02:81:64:58:cf:d1) Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, Dst: yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 0100 .... = Version: 4 .... 0101 = Header Length: 20 bytes (5) Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP: CS0, ECN: Not-ECT) Total Length: 32 Identification: 0x5bf5 (23541) Flags: 0x4000, Don't fragment Time to live: 56 Protocol: UDP (17) Header checksum: 0x2fc3 [validation disabled] [Header checksum status: Unverified] Source: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Destination: yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 5060, Dst Port: 15060 Source Port: 5060 Destination Port: 15060 Length: 12 Checksum: 0xfa28 [unverified] [Checksum Status: Unverified] [Stream index: 0] Data (4 bytes) 0000 00 00 00 00 .... Data: 00000000 [Length: 4] I found this in kam_stun.c: static int stun_parse_header(struct stun_msg* req, USHORT_T* error_code) { if (sizeof(req->hdr) > req->msg.buf.len) { /* the received message does not contain whole header */ LOG(L_INFO, "INFO: stun_parse_header: incomplete header of STUN message\n"); /* Any better solution? IMHO it's not possible to send error response * because the transaction ID is not available. */ return FATAL_ERROR; } ... Could someone please explain what's wrong? Med vennlig hilsen Pan B. Christensen Utvikler Phonect AS Brugata 19, PB 9156 Grønland, N-0133 Oslo, Norway E-post: pan.christensen(a)phonect.no<mailto:pan.christensen@phonect.no> Mobil: 41 88 88 00 [cid:image007.png@01D3A0E8.376921D0] <http://www.phonect.no/> [facebook_2]<https://www.facebook.com/phonectno> [LinkedIn_logo_initials (1)] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/44983?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Ac…>

2 3

Dialplan module for load balancing
by igor.potjevlesch＠gmail.com 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hello, I'm maybe confused on how to use dialplan module. I have a dialplan setup for a long time now and I'd like to add a new rule with the same match_exp than an existing one but with a different repl_exp. If I set the same priority, the latest entry is used systematically. If I set priority +1, the new rule is never used. The goal is having two rules and alternatively reply with one or the other repl_exp. Is it possible? Regards, Igor.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users