sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

36 participants
37510 discussions

Re: [SR-Users] TLS cipher suites
by Steve 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Hello, Thank you both for your responses to my query about TLS cipher suites supported by Kamailio 4.3.4. When I used a self-signed certificate generated from an RSA key, the server selected the RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 cipher suite for the connection. When I used a self-signed certificate generated from an EC key, the server selected the ECDH-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 cipher suite for the connection. This was confirmed using the OpenSSL /s_client/ command and with Wireshark. In short, I am still unable to establish an ECDHE ephemeral key exchange even though the OpenSSL version 1.0.2g on Lubuntu 16.4.3 supports it. So I must not have the correct configuration of the TLS module for Kamailio 4.3.4 or else need to generate some other kind of key/certificate. I'm using the Kamailio and TLS config files that came with the package downloads, minimally modified to enable TLS and specify the file location of the key and certificate. I googled "ephemeral key exchange" and came across a posting on Stack Exchange talking about commands such as /SSL_CTX_set_temp_ecdh_callback/ that enable ephemeral key exchange. This command is not listed as a configuration setting in the TLS module man-page so I assume it is a coding command used within the module. In any case, I'd appreciate any further suggestions. Thanks, Steve --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

2 2

Anyone successfully run Fortify on Kamailio?
by Malcolm O'Hare 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

I've been trying to run Fortify Static Code Analyzer on the Kamailio build but all the ways its suggested to hook the build aren't working. I'm curious if anyone has tried to run it and been successful, and if they saved / remember what they did.

1 0

usrloc rpc command ul add
by Евгений Голей 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Hello! Tell me how, when using the "kamcmd ul.add location username@domain sip:contact_username@contact_ip:contact_port 0 1.0 ??? 0 0 0" command, specify parameters that are not used, for example path ? -- С уважением, Евгений Голей

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua sr.sqlops.query exit status
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Now the backtrace is different, gram the output for info locals in frame 5 and 6. Cheers, Daniel On 10.01.18 11:26, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: > I have overwritten the core file b y accident. I did a new backtrace: > > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x00007fd3b24365a0 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #1 0x00007fd3b2437b62 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #2 0x00007fd3b242a040 in lua_settable () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #3 0x00007fd3b243a412 in luaL_findtable () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #4 0x00007fd3b243a581 in luaL_openlib () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #5 0x00007fd3b2684870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs (L=0xeffdb0) at > app_lua_sr.c:1973 > #6 0x00007fd3b26cf107 in lua_sr_openlibs (L=0xeffdb0) at > app_lua_api.c:185 > #7 0x00007fd3b26cf7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:225 > #8 0x00007fd3b265b97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 > #9 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fd3bc82cc70, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:938 > #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:964 > #11 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 > #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffeee95b548) at > main.c:2646 > > (gdb) frame 7 > #7 0x00007fd3b26cf7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:225 > 225 app_lua_api.c: No such file or directory. > (gdb) list > 220 in app_lua_api.c > (gdb) info locals > L = 0xeffdb0 > txt = 0x7fd3bd00dce7 <__fprintf+135> "H\201\304", <incomplete sequence > \330> > li = 0x0 > sbuf = {st_dev = 0, st_ino = 206158430256, st_nlink = 140732901208248, > st_mode = 4002787296, st_uid = 32766, st_gid = 4002787464, __pad0 = > 14, st_rdev = 140728898420739, st_size = 0, > st_blksize = 30795, st_blocks = 7970120, st_atim = {tv_sec = > 7929944, tv_nsec = 0}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 0, tv_nsec = > 140732901208128}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 140547210663782, > tv_nsec = 7938688}, __glibc_reserved = {-541165879423, > 140732901208240, 5544260}} > __FUNCTION__ = "lua_sr_init_probe" > > I assume that in this case i need to do a "frame 7". > > > Jan > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:18: >> Few more things to grab from core file with gdb -- take the output for >> the next commands: >> >> frame 16 >> >> list >> >> info locals >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On 10.01.18 11:08, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>> Daniel, >>> >>> Here are the app_lua settings: >>> >>> # ----- app_lua params ----- >>> modparam("app_lua", "load", "/etc/kamailio/kamailio_functions.lua") >>> modparam("app_lua", "register", "sqlops") >>> modparam("app_lua", "register", "siputils") >>> modparam("app_lua", "register", "xhttp") >>> >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:03: >>>> Can you give here the parameters you set for app_lua module? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09.01.18 22:27, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>> Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> Here is the backtrace. >>>>> >>>>> (gdb) backtrace >>>>> #0 0x00007fe41140e067 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at >>>>> ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56 >>>>> #1 0x00007fe41140f448 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 >>>>> #2 0x00007fe41144c1b4 in __libc_message (do_abort=do_abort@entry=1, >>>>> fmt=fmt@entry=0x7fe411541210 "*** Error in `%s': %s: 0x%s ***\n") at >>>>> ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 >>>>> #3 0x00007fe41145198e in malloc_printerr (action=1, >>>>> str=0x7fe41153d42a "realloc(): invalid next size", ptr=<optimized >>>>> out>) at malloc.c:4996 >>>>> #4 0x00007fe41145476b in _int_realloc (av=av@entry=0x7fe41177e620 >>>>> <main_arena>, oldp=oldp@entry=0x21789c0, oldsize=oldsize@entry=736, >>>>> nb=nb@entry=1552) at malloc.c:4234 >>>>> #5 0x00007fe411455769 in __GI___libc_realloc (oldmem=0x21789d0, >>>>> bytes=1536) at malloc.c:3029 >>>>> #6 0x00007fe40c460cae in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #7 0x00007fe40c45c9aa in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #8 0x00007fe40c46166d in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #9 0x00007fe40c4640b3 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #10 0x00007fe40c45ccd1 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #11 0x00007fe40c45c92e in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #12 0x00007fe40c45d7bb in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #13 0x00007fe40c45d8c2 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #14 0x00007fe40c459528 in lua_load () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #15 0x00007fe40c469d8c in luaL_loadbuffer () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #16 0x00007fe40c6fe7d7 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:228 >>>>> #17 0x00007fe40c68a97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 >>>>> #18 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3b998, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:938 >>>>> #19 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3bec0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #20 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3c708, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #21 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3cd78, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #22 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3d360, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #23 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e1e8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #24 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e938, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #25 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3f4c8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #26 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3fca0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #27 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40118, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #28 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40780, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #29 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c422f8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #30 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42968, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #31 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42e50, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #32 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43b48, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #33 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43f20, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #34 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c446e0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #35 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44bd0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #36 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44ec8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #37 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45378, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #38 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c458f0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #39 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45e48, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #40 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c464e8, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #41 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47278, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #42 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c476f0, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #43 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47b68, >>>>> rank=-127) >>>>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>>>> #44 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at >>>>> core/sr_module.c:964 >>>>> #45 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 >>>>> #46 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffe17f0e788) at >>>>> main.c:2646 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 22:21: >>>>>> Can you install the debug symbols for kamailio as well? There >>>>>> should be >>>>>> a kamailio-dbg package or so ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Then take again the backtrace, it should provide more information -- >>>>>> file and line for each frame, ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 09.01.18 21:21, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>>>> Daniel, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just upgraded to 5.1 but kamailio now generates a core file. I'm >>>>>>> running debian 8.10. It seems to crash on liblua5.1.so.0 : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Using host libthread_db library >>>>>>> "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". >>>>>>> Core was generated by `kamailio -m 1500'. >>>>>>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>>>>>> #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> (gdb) backtrace >>>>>>> #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #1 0x00007f30c17f3b62 in ?? () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #2 0x00007f30c17e6040 in lua_settable () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #3 0x00007f30c17f6412 in luaL_findtable () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #4 0x00007f30c17f6581 in luaL_openlib () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>>>> #5 0x00007f30c1a40870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>>>> #6 0x00007f30c1a8b107 in lua_sr_openlibs () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>>>> #7 0x00007f30c1a8b7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>>>> #8 0x00007f30c1a1797d in ?? () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>>>> #9 0x0000000000549944 in ?? () >>>>>>> #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child () >>>>>>> #11 0x0000000000421498 in main_loop () >>>>>>> #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main () >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl schreef op 2018-01-09 20:53: >>>>>>>> Daniel, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Currently running kamailio 5.0.5. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 13:27: >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> what version of kamailio are you using? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 07.01.18 22:14, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using >>>>>>>>>> sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would >>>>>>>>>> like to >>>>>>>>>> test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function >>>>>>>>>> sr.sqlops.query >>>>>>>>>> in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it >>>>>>>>>> possible >>>>>>>>>> to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result seems >>>>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>>>> nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jan Hazenberg >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>>>> >>>>> >>> > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - March 5-7, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua sr.sqlops.query exit status
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Few more things to grab from core file with gdb -- take the output for the next commands: frame 16 list info locals Cheers, Daniel On 10.01.18 11:08, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: > Daniel, > > Here are the app_lua settings: > > # ----- app_lua params ----- > modparam("app_lua", "load", "/etc/kamailio/kamailio_functions.lua") > modparam("app_lua", "register", "sqlops") > modparam("app_lua", "register", "siputils") > modparam("app_lua", "register", "xhttp") > > > Jan > > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-10 11:03: >> Can you give here the parameters you set for app_lua module? >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On 09.01.18 22:27, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>> Daniel, >>> >>> Here is the backtrace. >>> >>> (gdb) backtrace >>> #0 0x00007fe41140e067 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at >>> ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56 >>> #1 0x00007fe41140f448 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 >>> #2 0x00007fe41144c1b4 in __libc_message (do_abort=do_abort@entry=1, >>> fmt=fmt@entry=0x7fe411541210 "*** Error in `%s': %s: 0x%s ***\n") at >>> ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 >>> #3 0x00007fe41145198e in malloc_printerr (action=1, >>> str=0x7fe41153d42a "realloc(): invalid next size", ptr=<optimized >>> out>) at malloc.c:4996 >>> #4 0x00007fe41145476b in _int_realloc (av=av@entry=0x7fe41177e620 >>> <main_arena>, oldp=oldp@entry=0x21789c0, oldsize=oldsize@entry=736, >>> nb=nb@entry=1552) at malloc.c:4234 >>> #5 0x00007fe411455769 in __GI___libc_realloc (oldmem=0x21789d0, >>> bytes=1536) at malloc.c:3029 >>> #6 0x00007fe40c460cae in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #7 0x00007fe40c45c9aa in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #8 0x00007fe40c46166d in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #9 0x00007fe40c4640b3 in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #10 0x00007fe40c45ccd1 in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #11 0x00007fe40c45c92e in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #12 0x00007fe40c45d7bb in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #13 0x00007fe40c45d8c2 in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #14 0x00007fe40c459528 in lua_load () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #15 0x00007fe40c469d8c in luaL_loadbuffer () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #16 0x00007fe40c6fe7d7 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:228 >>> #17 0x00007fe40c68a97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 >>> #18 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3b998, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:938 >>> #19 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3bec0, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #20 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3c708, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #21 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3cd78, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #22 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3d360, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #23 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e1e8, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #24 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e938, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #25 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3f4c8, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #26 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3fca0, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #27 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40118, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #28 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40780, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #29 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c422f8, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #30 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42968, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #31 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42e50, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #32 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43b48, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #33 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43f20, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #34 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c446e0, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #35 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44bd0, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #36 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44ec8, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #37 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45378, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #38 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c458f0, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #39 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45e48, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #40 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c464e8, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #41 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47278, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #42 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c476f0, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #43 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47b68, rank=-127) >>> at core/sr_module.c:935 >>> #44 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at >>> core/sr_module.c:964 >>> #45 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 >>> #46 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffe17f0e788) at >>> main.c:2646 >>> >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 22:21: >>>> Can you install the debug symbols for kamailio as well? There >>>> should be >>>> a kamailio-dbg package or so ... >>>> >>>> Then take again the backtrace, it should provide more information -- >>>> file and line for each frame, ... >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09.01.18 21:21, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>> Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> Just upgraded to 5.1 but kamailio now generates a core file. I'm >>>>> running debian 8.10. It seems to crash on liblua5.1.so.0 : >>>>> >>>>> Using host libthread_db library >>>>> "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". >>>>> Core was generated by `kamailio -m 1500'. >>>>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>>>> #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> (gdb) backtrace >>>>> #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #1 0x00007f30c17f3b62 in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #2 0x00007f30c17e6040 in lua_settable () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #3 0x00007f30c17f6412 in luaL_findtable () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #4 0x00007f30c17f6581 in luaL_openlib () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>>>> #5 0x00007f30c1a40870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>> #6 0x00007f30c1a8b107 in lua_sr_openlibs () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>> #7 0x00007f30c1a8b7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>> #8 0x00007f30c1a1797d in ?? () from >>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>>>> #9 0x0000000000549944 in ?? () >>>>> #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child () >>>>> #11 0x0000000000421498 in main_loop () >>>>> #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main () >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>>> >>>>> jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl schreef op 2018-01-09 20:53: >>>>>> Daniel, >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently running kamailio 5.0.5. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> >>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 13:27: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> what version of kamailio are you using? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 07.01.18 22:14, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using >>>>>>>> sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would >>>>>>>> like to >>>>>>>> test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function >>>>>>>> sr.sqlops.query >>>>>>>> in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it >>>>>>>> possible >>>>>>>> to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result seems >>>>>>>> to be >>>>>>>> nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jan Hazenberg >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>> >>> > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - March 5-7, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua sr.sqlops.query exit status
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Jan '18

10 Jan '18

Can you give here the parameters you set for app_lua module? Cheers, Daniel On 09.01.18 22:27, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: > Daniel, > > Here is the backtrace. > > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x00007fe41140e067 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at > ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:56 > #1 0x00007fe41140f448 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 > #2 0x00007fe41144c1b4 in __libc_message (do_abort=do_abort@entry=1, > fmt=fmt@entry=0x7fe411541210 "*** Error in `%s': %s: 0x%s ***\n") at > ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 > #3 0x00007fe41145198e in malloc_printerr (action=1, > str=0x7fe41153d42a "realloc(): invalid next size", ptr=<optimized > out>) at malloc.c:4996 > #4 0x00007fe41145476b in _int_realloc (av=av@entry=0x7fe41177e620 > <main_arena>, oldp=oldp@entry=0x21789c0, oldsize=oldsize@entry=736, > nb=nb@entry=1552) at malloc.c:4234 > #5 0x00007fe411455769 in __GI___libc_realloc (oldmem=0x21789d0, > bytes=1536) at malloc.c:3029 > #6 0x00007fe40c460cae in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #7 0x00007fe40c45c9aa in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #8 0x00007fe40c46166d in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #9 0x00007fe40c4640b3 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #10 0x00007fe40c45ccd1 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #11 0x00007fe40c45c92e in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #12 0x00007fe40c45d7bb in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #13 0x00007fe40c45d8c2 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #14 0x00007fe40c459528 in lua_load () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #15 0x00007fe40c469d8c in luaL_loadbuffer () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #16 0x00007fe40c6fe7d7 in lua_sr_init_probe () at app_lua_api.c:228 > #17 0x00007fe40c68a97d in child_init (rank=-127) at app_lua_mod.c:197 > #18 0x0000000000549944 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3b998, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:938 > #19 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3bec0, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #20 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3c708, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #21 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3cd78, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #22 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3d360, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #23 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e1e8, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #24 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3e938, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #25 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3f4c8, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #26 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c3fca0, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #27 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40118, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #28 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c40780, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #29 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c422f8, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #30 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42968, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #31 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c42e50, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #32 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43b48, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #33 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c43f20, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #34 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c446e0, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #35 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44bd0, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #36 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c44ec8, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #37 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45378, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #38 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c458f0, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #39 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c45e48, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #40 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c464e8, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #41 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47278, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #42 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c476f0, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #43 0x0000000000549662 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fe410c47b68, rank=-127) > at core/sr_module.c:935 > #44 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child (rank=-127) at core/sr_module.c:964 > #45 0x0000000000422c1c in main_loop () at main.c:1576 > #46 0x000000000042aab9 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffe17f0e788) at > main.c:2646 > > > Jan > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 22:21: >> Can you install the debug symbols for kamailio as well? There should be >> a kamailio-dbg package or so ... >> >> Then take again the backtrace, it should provide more information -- >> file and line for each frame, ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On 09.01.18 21:21, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>> Daniel, >>> >>> Just upgraded to 5.1 but kamailio now generates a core file. I'm >>> running debian 8.10. It seems to crash on liblua5.1.so.0 : >>> >>> Using host libthread_db library >>> "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". >>> Core was generated by `kamailio -m 1500'. >>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>> #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> (gdb) backtrace >>> #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #1 0x00007f30c17f3b62 in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #2 0x00007f30c17e6040 in lua_settable () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #3 0x00007f30c17f6412 in luaL_findtable () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #4 0x00007f30c17f6581 in luaL_openlib () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 >>> #5 0x00007f30c1a40870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>> #6 0x00007f30c1a8b107 in lua_sr_openlibs () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>> #7 0x00007f30c1a8b7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>> #8 0x00007f30c1a1797d in ?? () from >>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so >>> #9 0x0000000000549944 in ?? () >>> #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child () >>> #11 0x0000000000421498 in main_loop () >>> #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main () >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jan >>> >>> jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl schreef op 2018-01-09 20:53: >>>> Daniel, >>>> >>>> Currently running kamailio 5.0.5. >>>> >>>> Jan >>>> >>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 13:27: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> what version of kamailio are you using? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Daniel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 07.01.18 22:14, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using >>>>>> sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would >>>>>> like to >>>>>> test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: >>>>>> >>>>>> if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function >>>>>> sr.sqlops.query >>>>>> in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it possible >>>>>> to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result seems >>>>>> to be >>>>>> nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Jan Hazenberg >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - March 5-7, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua sr.sqlops.query exit status
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

Can you install the debug symbols for kamailio as well? There should be a kamailio-dbg package or so ... Then take again the backtrace, it should provide more information -- file and line for each frame, ... Cheers, Daniel On 09.01.18 21:21, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: > Daniel, > > Just upgraded to 5.1 but kamailio now generates a core file. I'm > running debian 8.10. It seems to crash on liblua5.1.so.0 : > > Using host libthread_db library > "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". > Core was generated by `kamailio -m 1500'. > Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x00007f30c17f25a0 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #1 0x00007f30c17f3b62 in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #2 0x00007f30c17e6040 in lua_settable () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #3 0x00007f30c17f6412 in luaL_findtable () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #4 0x00007f30c17f6581 in luaL_openlib () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblua5.1.so.0 > #5 0x00007f30c1a40870 in lua_sr_kemi_register_libs () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so > #6 0x00007f30c1a8b107 in lua_sr_openlibs () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so > #7 0x00007f30c1a8b7c1 in lua_sr_init_probe () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so > #8 0x00007f30c1a1797d in ?? () from > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_lua.so > #9 0x0000000000549944 in ?? () > #10 0x0000000000549c72 in init_child () > #11 0x0000000000421498 in main_loop () > #12 0x000000000042aab9 in main () > > > > Thanks, > > Jan > > jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl schreef op 2018-01-09 20:53: >> Daniel, >> >> Currently running kamailio 5.0.5. >> >> Jan >> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 13:27: >>> Hello, >>> >>> what version of kamailio are you using? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> >>> >>> On 07.01.18 22:14, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using >>>> sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would like to >>>> test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: >>>> >>>> if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) >>>> >>>> Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function sr.sqlops.query >>>> in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it possible >>>> to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result seems to be >>>> nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Jan Hazenberg >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - March 5-7, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] app_lua sr.sqlops.query exit status
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

Hello, I needed to know in order to suggest use of "KSR" package or not, instead of "sr". The "sr" package likely to be obsoleted soon, as KSR has lot more exported functions and it is part of the kemi framework. See: http://kamailio.org/docs/tutorials/devel/kamailio-kemi-framework/ http://kamailio.org/docs/tutorials/devel/kamailio-kemi-framework/modules/#s… However, 5.0 doesn't have so many KSR exports as 5.1, and not sure if KSR has the sqlops exports in that version -- too late to check more in the code now... Looking at the code, sr.sqlops.query() should return -1 in case of error and 0 if ok. Cheers, Daniel On 09.01.18 20:53, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: > Daniel, > > Currently running kamailio 5.0.5. > > Jan > > Daniel-Constantin Mierla schreef op 2018-01-09 13:27: >> Hello, >> >> what version of kamailio are you using? >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On 07.01.18 22:14, jenus(a)cyberchaos.nl wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using >>> sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would like to >>> test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: >>> >>> if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) >>> >>> Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function sr.sqlops.query >>> in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it possible >>> to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result seems to be >>> nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jan Hazenberg >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >>> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - March 5-7, 2018, Berlin - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

app_lua sr.sqlops.query exit status
by jenus＠cyberchaos.nl 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

Hello, I'm doing some tests with a lua script and app_lua. I'm using sr.sqlops.query to insert records into the database but would like to test the exit status of the sql query. In kamailio i can do: if(!sql_query("kamailio", "INSERT INTO subscriber ...")) Is there some kind of exit status for the lua function sr.sqlops.query in order to do the same check in lua? In other words, is it possible to check if a sql query was successful in lua? The result seems to be nill in all cases for a INSERT in lua using sr.sqlops.query. Thanks, Jan Hazenberg

2 4

t_relay dying ?
by Jean Cérien 09 Jan '18

09 Jan '18

Hello I am using kamailio 5.0.2, on a debian 9 system. Everything was running fine, until one of our voip provider changed his switch. Our kamailio is relaying between several voip providers and several asterisk (only the signalisation, no rtp). When we get an invite from this new switch, we select an asterisk and relay it correctly to this box. However, the OK is relayed back. But when the voip providers sends an ACK for this OK, the t_relay function does not return at all, it just dies with no action and no error. Here is the snippet from route(relay) xlog("L_INFO","route(relay) @@ $rm - Source: $si:$sp, fu:$fu, tu:$tu\n" ); $var(restrelay)=t_relay(); xlog("L_INFO","route(relay) @@ $rm - t_relay result: $var(restrelay)" ); if (!$var(restrelay)) { When processing the initial invite, I do get both INFO messages. When the ACK is processed, I only get one INFO message, and no ACK is relayed - so it seems execution dies in the t_relay What could be wrong ??? J. Details of the ACK: ACK sip:dialednumber@kamailioIP:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP VOIPPROVIDERIP:5060;branch=z9hG4bKjq16fi00d85uee181ic0.1 To: <sip:kamailioIP:5060>;tag=as7f10ed48 From: <sip:sourcenumber@orange-multimedia.fr >;tag=SD8u3ob01-7dd8efde-0002-00d5-0000-0000 Call-ID: SD8u3ob01-688d41f5e2164ceeafe76f40b82b3f97-v300g00030 CSeq: 1 ACK Max-Forwards: 66 Content-Length: 0 Route: <sip:kamailioIP;lr=on;ftag=SD8u3ob01-7dd8efde-0002-00d5-0000-0000;did=a0b.49d> (should you have enough width; the diagram will look ok) VOIP PROVIDER KAMAILIO ASTERISK 21:38:54.685149 │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +0.000451 │ 100 trying -- your call is │ │ ▒ 21:38:54.685600 │ <────────────────────────── │ │ ▒ +0.000084 │ │ INVITE (SDP) │ ▒ 21:38:54.685684 │ │ ──────────────────────────> │ ▒ +0.000831 │ │ 100 Trying │ ▒ 21:38:54.686515 │ │ <────────────────────────── │ ▒ +0.000471 │ │ 200 OK (SDP) │ ▒ 21:38:54.686986 │ │ <────────────────────────── │ ▒ +0.000394 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ ▒ 21:38:54.687380 │ <────────────────────────── │ │ ▒ +0.038694 │ ACK │ │ ▒ 21:38:54.726074 │ ──────────────────────────> │ │ ▒ +0.060155 │ │ 200 OK (SDP) │ ▒ 21:38:54.786229 │ │ <<<──────────────────────── │ ▒ +0.000138 │ 200 OK (SDP) │ │ ▒ 21:38:54.786367 │ <<<──────────────────────── │ │ ▒ +0.005721 │ ACK │ │

10 25

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users