sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37519 discussions

Real error?
by Olvera, Victor 01 Dec '16

01 Dec '16

Is this a real error? 9(1899) ERROR: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:635]: I_Snd_CER(): I_Snd_CER(): Error on finding local host address > Socket operation on non-socket Great regards, Victor Olvera victor.olvera(a)verizonwireless.com<mailto:victor.olvera@verizonwireless.com> mobile # 001-214-923-9405

3 2

In dialog messages cannot be routed after re-registration with outbound and gruu
by Robert 01 Dec '16

01 Dec '16

Hi, I'm using outbound with gruu enabled and with edge proxy, registrar and auth proxy all running as separate entities. My problem is once a dialog is formed between two UAs, if one side re-registers and gets assigned a new flow token, all subsequent in-dialog messages cannot be routed because the flow token in the Route set is no longer valid. What is the proper way to update the binding? I read in this thread <http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Outbound-and-Registrar-No-binding-u…> that "using GRUU means that Outbound is also used, so the Contact has a +sip.instance and reg-id params which are inspected by the registrar to create/update/delete a binding". How is the binding updated exactly? Any help would be appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/In-dialog-messages-cannot-be-routed… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

Kamailio Processes Stop Responding
by Peter DiSanto 30 Nov '16

30 Nov '16

We have a Kamailio 4.2 machine with a custom config file we've been using for the better part of two years without issue. Suddenly we've run into an issue where Kamailio just stops responding to any INVITEs, and stops any logging. The processes keep running but stop doing anything. It is a full production machine which naturally causes problems. I have the memlog from the restart after a hang if that helps, but I presume it is too large for this list. We have increased shared memory to 1536 and Pkg memory to 32 but that didn't help, and in any case the shmem stats look OK to us. It is a full production machine doing about 200 CPS, the load is barely measurable but turning logging to debug will surely kill it. We use TOPOH and do get lots of log entries like : /usr/sbin/kamailio[17865]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2048]: parse_via(): ERROR: parse_via: bad char <▒> on state 100 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17865]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2738]: parse_via(): ERROR: parse_via on: <▒#010d▒▒_▒#0117Jt▒#015#012X> /usr/sbin/kamailio[17865]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2744]: parse_via(): ERROR: parse_via: via parse error /usr/sbin/kamailio[17865]: ERROR: topoh [th_msg.c:438]: th_unmask_via(): cannot find cookie in via2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[17865]: ERROR: topoh [th_mask.c:165]: th_mask_decode(): invalid input string"642525435_130081688(a)xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" /usr/sbin/kamailio[17865]: ERROR: topoh [th_msg.c:484]: th_unmask_callid(): cannot decode callid and CRITICAL: sl [../../forward.h:279]: msg_send(): unknown proto 0 However, I believe these are not new and do not seem to affect overall call processing. Anyone have any idea what to look for or how to figure this out? shmem:fragments = 4019 shmem:free_size = 1538943936 shmem:max_used_size = 84349120 shmem:real_used_size = 71668800 shmem:total_size = 1610612736 shmem:used_size = 54855384

2 1

Offload SSL from backends with Kamailio
by Vladyslav Zakhozhai 30 Nov '16

30 Nov '16

Hi, I'm trying to understand the best (or reasonable) approach of offloading SSL encryption from backend to Kamailio. Let me simplify a little bit: UAC == SIP/TLS ==> Kamailio == SIP/UDP ==> FreeSWITCH My main problem is in Contact header of SIP packet which passes through Kamailio SIP proxy and remains unmodified. For example, REGISTER request. There is FreeSWITCH backend which is registrar server as well. UAC send REGISTER request to it through Kamailio SIP proxy via SIP/TLS. This request dispatches to backend(s) by Kamailio with dispatcher module. Backend does not configured to support TLS. In this case everything works fine: I see REGISTER requests on FreeSWITCH. But Contact header of SIP message which is passing Kamailio remains unmodified. And as result I see on FreeSWITCH something like the following: Call-ID: Jpmjp4ruHI User: user_name@domain_name Contact: "" <sip:user_name@uac_ip :27026;transport=tls;fs_path=sip%3Akamailio_ip%3A5060> Agent: Linphone/3.10.2 (belle-sip/1.5.0) Status: Registered(TLS)(unknown) EXP(2016-11-28 11:48:28) EXPSECS(110) Ping-Status: Reachable Ping-Time: 0.00 Host: kamailio_host IP: kamailio_ip Port: 5060 Auth-User: unknown Auth-Realm: domain_name MWI-Account: user_name@domain_name As a result FreeSWITCH tries to originate call over SIP/TLS and it fails because FreeSWITCH does not configured to work with TLS. I want to understand what is correct workaraound of this issue. Do I need to modify Contact header manually on kamailio host and this is right approach? Or kamailio in case of correct config rewrites this header itself? If parts of my kamailio config would be useful I will post it later. Thanks in advance. -- С уважением, Владислав Захожай

4 8

kazoo module
by Ján Füri 30 Nov '16

30 Nov '16

Hello, I am trying to install kazoo module. According to documentation I have installed libraries : librabbitmq, libjson, libuuid, but It always fails on missing json.h : CC (gcc) [M kazoo.so] kz_trans.o In file included from kz_trans.c:53:0: kz_json.h:12:18: fatal error: json.h: No such file or directory #include <json.h> ^ compilation terminated. ../../Makefile.rules:97: recipe for target 'kz_trans.o' failed make[1]: *** [kz_trans.o] Error 1 Makefile:511: recipe for target 'modules' failed make: *** [modules] Error 1 Can anybody help me ? BR Jan

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio IMS virtual machine
by Franz Edler 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Hi Rafael, There should not be a problem with the VMware mage. Regarding your question: you have to check kamailio-pcscf.cfg to recognize when and it how forward the SIP message towards the I-CSCF. I guess it is the statement "t_relay();" in line 896. You may provide a core tracefile (generated with tcpdump), then I may have aquick look ate your ise. BR Franz Von: Rafi Aizenstain [mailto:rafi_a@cellowireless.com] Gesendet: Montag, 28. November 2016 16:12 An: franz.edler(a)technikum-wien.at Betreff: Kamailio IMS virtual machine Hello Mr. Franz I'm trying to build a testbed using the VMware image you kindly have shared here: https://www.kamailio.org/w/2016/02/kamailio-ims-getting-started-box/ But when running the machine as-is I keep getting errors from the P-CSCF module and it doesn't forward the SIP message towards the I-CSCF. Please see the following log: root@server:~# kamailio -f /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg loading modules under config path: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/ 0(2096) INFO: <core> [sctp_core.c:75]: sctp_core_check_support(): SCTP API not enabled - if you want to use it, load sctp module Listening on udp: server.net1.test [10.0.0.9]:4060 Aliases: *: pcscf.net1.test:* WARNING: no fork mode 0(2096) INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:54]: ob_load_api(): Failed to import bind_ob 0(2096) INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:174]: mod_init(): outbound module not available 0(2096) INFO: ims_usrloc_pcscf [hslot.c:62]: ul_init_locks(): locks array size 512 0(2096) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:150]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 0(2096) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:200]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 0(2096) WARNING: ims_usrloc_pcscf [usrloc_db.c:59]: connect_db(): DB connection already open... continuing 0(2096) INFO: <script>: [REGISTER] from [sip:bob@net1.test] to [sip:bob@net1.test] 0(2096) ERROR: <script>: REGISTER (sip:bob@net1.test (10.0.0.200:59721) to sip:bob@net1.test, 7013b8fc-11a0-2b70-3654-9ce68424e9a7) Looking into the configuration files I couldn't understand how does the P-CSCF determine that it has to forward the SIP message towards the I-CSCF module. Are you aware of any issue with the VMware machine you have shared. Please advise. Best Regards, Rafael A.

2 1

LCR modules troubles
by Laura 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Dear list, i have a strange situation with module LCR on kamailio 4.3.6. A customer send a call to my first kamailio and i forward it with some tech prefix to my supplier. Here the 2 correct invites.. customer is sending to me with prefix 9001 14:34:29.155719 CUSTOMER_IP.101:5060 -> EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060 INVITE sip:900133139864069@EU_KMAILIO_IP.40 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:CUSTOMER_IP.101;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;vst=AAAAAAwFBQQFAwEACgkFDQgADXADCG4DDQEABQUWHwYGLjEwMQ-->. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.101;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.4853821c2be0bf7d75377fce7683f593.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060;branch=z9hG4bK504DC634. Remote-Party-ID: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. From: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;tag=33F431FC-2103. To: <sip:900133139864069@EU_KMAILIO_IP.40>. Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:34:29 GMT. Call-ID: 9A8A4545-B4AE11E6-9238E2D3-6BBD43E(a)CUSTOMER_IP.108. Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat. Min-SE: 1800. Cisco-Guid: 2592672861-3031306726-2677997592-0419390928. User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x. Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 69. ..... and i forward to my supplier U 2016/11/28 14:34:29.157516 EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060 -> EU_SUPPLIER_IP.198:5060 INVITE sip:00233139864069@EU_SUPPLIER_IP.198 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:EU_KMAILIO_IP.40;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;did=ff5.6f01;vst=AAAAAAkAAgIAAgIKAQ4CBAYPeXIECQAABAcAAwQIAAUJOA--;nat=yes>. Record-Route: <sip:CUSTOMER_IP.101;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;vst=AAAAAAwFBQQFAwEACgkFDQgADXADCG4DDQEABQUWHwYGLjEwMQ-->. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.782830bfdde5e873d3dc6a71bcbba70f.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.101;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.4853821c2be0bf7d75377fce7683f593.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060;branch=z9hG4bK504DC634. Remote-Party-ID: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. From: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;tag=33F431FC-2103. To: <sip:00233139864069@EU_SUPPLIER_IP.198>. Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:34:29 GMT. Call-ID: 9A8A4545-B4AE11E6-9238E2D3-6BBD43E(a)CUSTOMER_IP.108. Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat. Min-SE: 1800. Cisco-Guid: 2592672861-3031306726-2677997592-0419390928. Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 68. Timestamp: 1480343669. Contact: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060>. Expires: 180. Allow-Events: telephone-event. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Disposition: session;handling=required. Content-Length: 310. On both invites the To field respect the correct information from INVITE so that the kamailio CDR is working correct. After that the supplier reply me 503 and call is come back to my kamailio. LCR modules send the call to second supplier that on this case is my second box kamailio on another countrie.. Here there is this problem that i signed on RED U 2016/11/28 14:34:43.191618 EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060 -> EU_SUPPLIER2_IP.242:5060 *INVITE sip:905233139864069@EU_SUPPLIER2_IP.242 SIP/2.0.* Record-Route: <sip:EU_KMAILIO_IP.40;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;did=ff5.6f01>. Record-Route: <sip:CUSTOMER_IP.101;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;vst=AAAAAAwFBQQFAwEACgkFDQgADXADCG4DDQEABQUWHwYGLjEwMQ-->. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.782830bfdde5e873d3dc6a71bcbba70f.1. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.101;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.4853821c2be0bf7d75377fce7683f593.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060;branch=z9hG4bK504DC634. Remote-Party-ID: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. From: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;tag=33F431FC-2103. *To: <sip:900133139864069@EU_KMAILIO_IP.40>.* Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:34:29 GMT. Call-ID: 9A8A4545-B4AE11E6-9238E2D3-6BBD43E(a)CUSTOMER_IP.108. Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat. Min-SE: 1800. Cisco-Guid: 2592672861-3031306726-2677997592-0419390928. Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 68. Timestamp: 1480343669. Contact: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060>. Expires: 180. Allow-Events: telephone-event. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Disposition: session;handling=required. .... The LCR modules make the new INVITE using the original To field and don't rewrite it like on the first request.. How is that possibile ? Any idea ? Best regards Laura

3 2

XAVP Null
by Linux Vince 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Hi, I am sure i am doing something very basic wrongly. Here is my config file snippet $xavp(caller_peer[0]=>accountname) = "AAA"; xlog("L_WARN", "XAVP ACCOUNT NAME $xavp(caller_peer[0]=>accountname) \n"); No matter what i set this XAVP at, it always prints null in log file as below WARNING: <script>: XAVP ACCOUNT NAME <null> Please help how i can set XAVP and use it further in config file.

3 2

MSRP auth does not work with blink
by Pranathi Venkatayogi 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Hi, I am trying to use MSRP feature of blink client. In the server config when auth is challenged, I see the following error in the client. Can you please advise if I am configuring the server right? Note: the return value of pv_www_authenticate is "-5". 13 2016-11-07 17:57:26.494124 [blink.exe 24976]: Closed connection to 10.0.16.51:2855 ('NotificationProxyLogger' object has no attribute 'received_illegal_data') Find attached full set of client logs. Here is the relevant portion of kamailio.cfg: if (!pv_www_authenticate("MY_DOMAIN", "$var(passwd)", "0", "$msrp(method)")) { www_challenge("MY_DOMAIN", "1"); xlog("L_ERR", "MSRP auth failed with: $var(retValue)\n"); exit; } Thanks, Pranathi Venkatayogi System Developer II (520) 745-9447 x4466 www.cyracom.com<http://www.cyracom.com/> Join us: [cid:image001.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <https://www.facebook.com/pages/CyraCom-LLC/134704783312720> [cid:image002.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <https://twitter.com/cyracom> [cid:image003.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/cyracom> [cid:image004.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <http://www.cyracom.com/blog/> [cid:image005.png@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attached content may contain confidential or privileged material delivered for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. The content of this e-mail message, including any attachments, does not comprise a contract or a portion of a contract, and so does not bind CyraCom International, Inc. or any of its agents or subsidiaries. CyraCom, LLC and Voiance Language Services, LLC are wholly owned subsidiaries of CyraCom International, Inc.

2 4

Problems with Siremis and Kamailio - PHP7
by Diogenes Aviles 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

I have Kamailio 4.4 installed in ubuntu 16.04.03, with Siremis 4.2.0, PHP7 and apache2. All is OK, but when I try to install the Siremis Wizard, the step 2 (Data Base Configuration) doesn't work, and there is the message "Something Went Wrong". I tried all the option on Step 2, but the problem continuous. Then I can't go to step 3 Application Configuration. The Siremis DataBase is created and the user also. I appreciate any help. -- Diogenes

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users