- sr-users - kamailio.org

seturi analog for Kamailio 4.3
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my server using append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio generate 2 INVITE requests to it. As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch. I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I can not see this function at kamailio 4.3. Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.

3 8

Interoperability issues with older SIP clients
by Magnus Nordström 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hi, We got interoperability issues with older SIP-clients. When e.g. some parameters are included in the SIP header Record-Route the call does not get connected. Now we are looking for a solution for that. We are using kamailio as SIP-registrar/proxy and would like to know if we can keep the call state and rewrite headers that causes interoperability issues. We are aware that kamailio is not a B2BUA. The basic idea would be e.g.: 1. kamailio proxy identifies a call from a modern SIP-client to an old SIP-client 2. kamailio send the call to a interoperability module (?) 3. the interoperabilty module removes sip-headers known to cause issues and saves them. 4. the interoperabilty module makes sure it is in the SIP signaling path 5. the interoperabilty module send the call forward to the old SIP-client 6. the interoperabilty module stays in path rewriting the SIP-headers. The modern SIP-client receives the SIP-signaling as if it was not rewritten. Do you think this is possible with kamailio? Thankful for any hints or ideas. Magnus Nordström

2 1

does ipops module dns_int_match_ip(hostname, ipaddr) search all returned records?
by canuck15 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

I am reading the documentation for the ipops module dns_int_match_ip() function and it states the following: "Returns TRUE if ipaddr is associated by DNS to hostname. FALSE otherwise. It uses internal DNS resolver. At this moment, the function might not check all the IP addresses as returned by dns_sys_match_ip(), because the internal resolver targets to discover the first address to be used for relaying SIP traffic. Thus is better to use dns_sys_match_ip() if the host you want to check has many IP addresses, in different address famililies (IPv4/6)." I am not sure what that statement means. I will be using this for IP authentication where the records it is checking against are in a mysql database and may or may not be be using the DNS name instead of the IP. Many of those DNS names could return several IP addresses and the incoming call could be on any one of those IP addresses. So when I do a check of a hostname against an IP address I want all returned A or srv IP's to be checked against the IP. Not just the first IP returned when checked. I do not believe dns_sys_match() will be fast enough on a busy server so I would prefer to using dns_int_match_ip(). If anyone can clarify what that statement means regarding "internal resolver targets to discover the first address" and whether that would affect my use it would be greatly appreciated. On a related note, is there any way to check the contents of the dns resolver cache? I looked through kamctl and kamcmd but didn't find anything. I tried "kamctl address show" but that didn't return anything.

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value
by Slava Bendersky 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hello Everyone, Here updated version. Trying remove Record-Route after the coma. My log shows Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: INFO: <script>: [SUBSCRIBE], Inbound connection from <Client Public IP> Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: ERROR: <script>: <null> Mar 14 01:25:21 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[751]: INFO: <script>: [SUBSCRIBE], Route for removal: '<null>' route snippet. route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] { # Getting record routes if(is_present_hf("Route")) { xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Inbound connection from <$si>\n"); if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { if(is_ip_rfc1918($si)) { xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[-1])"); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[-1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[-1]"); } else { xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])"); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]"); } } } return; } Slava, From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:00:44 PM Subject: [SR-Users] remove_hf_value Hello Everyone, I am trying adjust Record-Route, but can't match headers value And I am call route(ROUTE_HDR_ORG); right after route(WITHINDLG); route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] { # Getting record routes if(is_present_hf("Record-Route")) { if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])"); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]"); } } return; } Any help Thank you, Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

What does it mean when auth_check and auth_challenge flags are "0"?
by canuck15 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

I am trying to decipher a kamailio.cfg file for a particular open source project. There are problems with authentication and I am trying to understand why. They use the following lines for authentication check if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", "0")) { auth_challenge("$fd", "0"); exit; The documentation only talks about using "1" and not "0". So I am trying to understand what the above statement with "0" is actually doing. Any help in this regard would be greatly appreciated.

2 1

Kamailio Freeswitch TCP call origination
by Niraj Roy 16 Mar '15

16 Mar '15

Hi, Here is the setup I have configured. --Two Kamailio K1, K2 Works as a registrar and call load balancer -- Three freeswitch works as the media server. -- They follow common MySQL database. Regular call flow User A---> Kamailio (K1)---> Freeswitch (F1)----Kamailio(K1)--->User B. Everything works fine as long as all users are registered and making call with single Kamailio. Now the problem starts when we distribute users on more than one kamailio. Let us take the case. UserA -- Registered over TCP with Kamailio (K1) UserB -- Registered over TCP with Kamailio (K2) Now User A initiates a call.. It will follow the same path User A---> Kamailio (K1)---> Freeswitch (F1)----Kamailio(K1)--->User B. Since User B is registered with K2. K1 being a public server won't be able to initiate any call to User B because there is no TCP connection established with it. Can anybody shade some light on this? Thanks,

3 2

how can I use WITH_IPAUTH when the IP may be stored in the DB as a FQDN?
by canuck15 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

Here is is the relevant section of kamailio.cfg $var(tempfU) = $fU; #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH if((!is_method("REGISTER")) && allow_source_address() && $au == "") { # Loading $fU from database using IP sql_pvquery("elxpbx", "SELECT name FROM sip WHERE host = '$si' AND sippasswd IS NULL", "$var(tempfU)"); # source IP allowed return; } The problem is that when host= somefqdn.com the above will fail since $si will always be an IP address as far as I can tell. More often than not host= is a fqdn and requiring it to always be an IP address is not an option. Converting it to IP before storing it in the DB is also not an option because it needs to be able to work of the IP address changes. So how can the above be done to accomodate the possibility that host= somefqdn.com or an IP address. Preferably in such a way that it can scale to hundreds/thousands of rows in the database without slowing things down or crashing.

3 4

Help with 407 Proxy Auth. Required
by Agiftel 14 Mar '15

14 Mar '15

Hi all, i cannot understand where is the problem with this transaction: Kamailio ask for Proxy authorization and in the second INVITE credentials are present. Can you help me understand? Regards U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.191831 10.160.21.51:5060 -> 10.160.20.18:5060 INVITE sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone SIP/2.0. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, OPTIONS, PRACK, NOTIFY, UPDATE. Supported: 100rel,from-change,timer,histinfo. User-Agent: OXO_GW_820/092.001. Session-Expires: 43200. P-Asserted-Identity: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>. History-Info: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;index=1. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. Contact: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@10.160.21.51;transport=UDP;user=phone>. Content-Type: application/sdp. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. CSeq: 178945190 INVITE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport;branch=z9hG4bK1fd5f032d2296189ba85c9bf8553ff28. Max-Forwards: 70. Content-Length: 208. . v=0. o=default 1425909984 1425909984 IN IP4 10.160.21.51. s=-. c=IN IP4 10.160.21.51. t=0 0. m=audio 32000 RTP/AVP 18 106 4 8 0. a=sendrecv. a=rtpmap:106 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:106 0-15. a=maxptime:90. U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.193299 10.160.20.18:5060 -> 10.160.21.51:5060 SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.aa4d. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. CSeq: 178945190 INVITE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1fd5f032d2296189ba85c9bf8553ff28;received=10.160.21.51. Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="oxo.longwave.labo", nonce="VP2palT9qD7LOD/nl465ujUSUW0NiDo/". Server: lw-sipproxysrv. Content-Length: 0. . U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.195800 10.160.21.51:5060 -> 10.160.20.18:5060 ACK sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone SIP/2.0. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.aa4d. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport;branch=z9hG4bK1fd5f032d2296189ba85c9bf8553ff28. CSeq: 178945190 ACK. Content-Length: 0. . U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.199176 10.160.21.51:5060 -> 10.160.20.18:5060 INVITE sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone SIP/2.0. Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="oxo",realm="oxo.longwave.labo",nonce="VP2palT9qD7LOD/nl465ujUSUW0NiDo/",uri="sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone",response="263ed33da80fb520af0fb0b2f246d310". Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, OPTIONS, PRACK, NOTIFY, UPDATE. Supported: 100rel,from-change,timer,histinfo. User-Agent: OXO_GW_820/092.001. Session-Expires: 43200. P-Asserted-Identity: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>. History-Info: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;index=1. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. Contact: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@10.160.21.51;transport=UDP;user=phone>. Content-Type: application/sdp. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. CSeq: 178945191 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 70. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport;branch=z9hG4bK503a3569cf5b057bd47d1154c5ba0842. Content-Length: 208. . v=0. o=default 1425909984 1425909984 IN IP4 10.160.21.51. s=-. c=IN IP4 10.160.21.51. t=0 0. m=audio 32000 RTP/AVP 18 106 4 8 0. a=sendrecv. a=rtpmap:106 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:106 0-15. a=maxptime:90. U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.200387 10.160.20.18:5060 -> 10.160.21.51:5060 SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.d413. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. CSeq: 178945191 INVITE. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK503a3569cf5b057bd47d1154c5ba0842;received=10.160.21.51. Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="oxo.longwave.labo", nonce="VP2palT9qD7LOD/nl465ujUSUW0NiDo/". Server: lw-sipproxysrv. Content-Length: 0. . U 2015/03/09 15:03:42.203016 10.160.21.51:5060 -> 10.160.20.18:5060 ACK sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone SIP/2.0. Call-ID: 346eded1901cb5b60b9d97a14f196e29(a)10.160.21.51. From: "PIPPO" <sip:2000@oxo.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=11056089a66d6a43ec04cd21b78039c5. To: <sip:1000@sip.longwave.labo;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.d413. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.160.21.51;rport;branch=z9hG4bK503a3569cf5b057bd47d1154c5ba0842. CSeq: 178945191 ACK. Content-Length: 0. . -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Help-with-407-Proxy-Auth-Required-t… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 4

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Where possible find updated version of options for textops. [sr_module.c:701]: find_mod_export_record(): find_export_record: <remove_hf_value> not found Specially Record-Route manipulation. Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:54:26 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, Here paste for first SUBSCRIBE. http://fpaste.org/197545/25118514/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 5:09:17 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, can you get the sip traffic from the network (from the first subscribe of this presence dialog)? It will help to see the Route set. Cheers, Daniel On 12/03/15 00:36, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, it doesn't matter if there is a mix of transports. If the UA is mirroring the Record-Route headers in the response to the NOTIFY, it should work fine. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 21:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them. If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

remove_hf_value
by Slava Bendersky 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hello Everyone, I am trying adjust Record-Route, but can't match headers value And I am call route(ROUTE_HDR_ORG); right after route(WITHINDLG); route[ROUTE_HDR_ORG] { # Getting record routes if(is_present_hf("Record-Route")) { if(is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog("$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])"); xlog("L_INFO", "[$rm], Route for removal: '$sel((a)hf_value.Record_Route[1])'\n"); remove_hf_value("Record-Route[1]"); } } return; } Any help Thank you, Slava.

1 0

using xHTTP module, bind port?
by SamyGo 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hi All, I am just trying xhttp_rpc module http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.2.x/modules/xhttp_rpc.html Where can I set/change the port for this module ? currently its only 5060 !? Thanks, Sammy.

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, it doesn't matter if there is a mix of transports. If the UA is mirroring the Record-Route headers in the response to the NOTIFY, it should work fine. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 21:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them. If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL
by Alex Balashov 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

I am also not at all an expert in GPL licencing or IP, but would like to add that any customisation you make specifically for the purpose of interacting with a billing server or other external application is likely to take the form of a Kamailio module, rather than modifications to the existing Kamailio modules, the Kamailio core, or any other part of the stock code tree. As far as I know, under the GPL--broadly speaking, for I certainly don't know or remember the specifics--modules get different treatment than modifications per se. As far sa I know, if you can stick your code into [a] completely self-contained module(s) (and given what you've said about what specifically you want to accomplish, it seems to me that you absolutely can) that interact(s) with Kamailio using its module APIs and requires no modifications to Kamailio itself, it's not subject to the same licence constraints as modifications per se. Please do not take my advice as stated, and consult a competent software/IP attorney. -- Alex -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

3 5

How to install kamailio-4.2.3 in debian Wheezy
by Yanko Marín Muro 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hello: How to install kamailio-4.2.3 in debian Wheezy? I need the procedure!!!! we can install P-CSCF, I-CSCF, S-CSCF and HSS on separate servers? Best regards, YANKO MARIN MURO --- This message was processed by Kaspersky Mail Gateway 5.6.28/RELEASE running at host imx3.etecsa.cu Visit our web-site: <http://www.kaspersky.com>, <http://www.viruslist.com>

3 2

Loadmodule mi_xmlrpc.so gives error
by SamyGo 13 Mar '15

13 Mar '15

Hi All, Im trying to load up module 'mi_xmlrpc.so' into my v4.2.1 Kamailio. It compiles nicely but when I try to load the module in config and restart kamailio it gives following error(s) 0(30917) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:597]: load_module(): could not open module </usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/mi_xmlrpc.so>: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/mi_xmlrpc.so: undefined symbol: xmlrpc_strsol 0(30917) : <core> [cfg.y:3436]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 329, column 12-25: failed to load module 0(30917) ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:166]: set_mod_param_regex(): No module matching <mi_xmlrpc> found Now, I've done some searching around and it seems like pre-req library version mismatch thing.. Do you guys have any solution to this. My end objective is to be able to send MI commands to my Kamailio server(s) via web-Interface. Any recommendations, examples are welcome. Best Regards, Sammy.

2 1

Kamailio and rtpengine Load Testing
by Marc Soda 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

I'm wondering if anyone has any experience load testing with Kamailio and rtpengine using WebRTC. I've had success load testing just Kamailio with sipp, but now I'd like to add the media piece and, if possible, do it via WebRTC. Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks, Marc

3 2

Continent Code GeoIP module, kamailio 4.2
by Rene Montilva 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

Hi list i'm trying to configure rtp engine routing by source ip, i'd like divide it by continent code, is there any pseudo-variables or possibilites to handle continent code. Team, any idea about it?

3 11

Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL
by Daniel Tryba 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

On Tuesday 10 March 2015 14:52:22 Shankar wrote: > We are exploring kamailio source for use in our VOIP solution. This is the > first time we are looking at open source. We have few doubts in using > kamailio for providing our VOIP service. Under GPL any customization > (customization mainly with respect to interacting with our proprietary > applications e.g. Billing server) we do to kamailio also has to be provided > to the end user. Our doubt is whether we can procure commercial rights to > our customised code? You should really contact a lawyer specialised in IP to get good advice. But gnu.org points out that above assumption isn't always true: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourceP… "The GPL does not require you to release your modified version. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization. But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL." So if you don't ship a binary to endusers, you don't have to release source (including modifications). It all depends on what you are supplying to your endusers (a service or a (complete) software product).

4 3

Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL
by Shankar 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

Hi, Thank you very much for the clarification. Our intention is to provide VOIP service and hence we need not expose our customized code to end users. Regards, Shankar --------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:56:02 +0100 From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL Message-ID: <DD23FDE1-C5DA-4D98-B20E-DE7173C4902F(a)edvina.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 11 Mar 2015, at 10:13, Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl> wrote: > On Tuesday 10 March 2015 14:52:22 Shankar wrote: >> We are exploring kamailio source for use in our VOIP solution. This is the >> first time we are looking at open source. We have few doubts in using >> kamailio for providing our VOIP service. Under GPL any customization >> (customization mainly with respect to interacting with our proprietary >> applications e.g. Billing server) we do to kamailio also has to be provided >> to the end user. Our doubt is whether we can procure commercial rights to >> our customised code? > > You should really contact a lawyer specialised in IP to get good advice. But > gnu.org points out that above assumption isn't always true: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePo stedPublic > > "The GPL does not require you to release your modified version. You are free > to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. > This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can > make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it > outside the organization. > > But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL > requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's > users, under the GPL." > > So if you don't ship a binary to endusers, you don't have to release source > (including modifications). It all depends on what you are supplying to your > endusers (a service or a (complete) software product). > There is a big difference between GPLv2 and GPLv3 here. For GPL2, providing services is not seen as distribution of the source, and the commercial code can stay in the company. For GPLv3 it's different as far as I understand. Kamailio is GPLv2 and Siremis - the web interface by Asipto - is GPLv3. /O

1 0

Parser error with sql_pvquery?
by Anthony Messina 12 Mar '15

12 Mar '15

I'm trying to do an sql_pvquery() and have PostgreSQL return the default value using COALESCE (if the other parts of the query return NULL) rather than placing the $null check on the return in the Kamailio script. I seem to be coming up on a parser issue, perhaps too many nested parentheses: sql_pvquery("kamailio", "SELECT COALESCE((SELECT value FROM usr_preferences WHERE attribute='callee_rtp_transport' AND (uuid='$sht(rtpengine=>$ci::$T_branch_idx::callee_ip)' OR username='$rU') LIMIT 1), 'RTP/AVP')", "$sht(rtpengine=>$ci::$T_branch_idx::callee_rtp_transport)"); <core> [cfg.y:3428]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 1444, column 14: syntax error Is this query "too complex" for the parser, or is there something I've missed above? Thanks. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them. If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

SIREMIS error
by Agiftel 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hi, i tried to install SIREMIS v 4.2 and i get error, already posted on internet/forum, regarding versione of PHP 5.6 What i didn't find is a solution. So my question is, I still unsupported by SIREMIS php v 5.4 and upper? Is there a solution?' Regards -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/SIREMIS-error-tp135884.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 2

OT: results investigating why kamailio.org was not responding recently
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hello, as some noticed and informed privately or on mailing list, several days ago kamailio.org was not accessible. It was caused by apache getting stuck on connecting to a remote host due to the pingback feature of wordpress. All the other services were fine. Listing running processes showed a large number of apache instances connecting to an address like 23.x.y.204 and being stuck in that state. Fetching the page from that address with wget resulted in some html with embedded obfuscated javascript. I couldn't find a reason why apache was not closing the connection, although there are some timeouts in configs. Also, as I expect apache/php/wordpress don't run javascript, the issue should be somewhere at the http layer. At some point apache reached the max number of threads and didn't serve other requests. The solution was to disable the pingbacks using a plugin for wordpress named: Disable XML-RPC Pingback . All seems ok for the last days. I posted here just in case it will be useful for someone else, but also to get hints on other tweaks that we should to do wordpress to prevent similar situation, if anyone can share from his/her experience. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Calling ims charging function in route_failure
by Shane Harrison 11 Mar '15

11 Mar '15

Hi all, What I want to do ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If a call to a SIP AoR fails then try the PSTN number associated with the AoR by routing the request to a PSTN gateway. Calls to a PSTN gateway need to be charged so need to call the Ro_CCR function in ims_charging module. How I tried to do it ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] block I call the Ro_CCR() Result was ~~~~~~~~ Kamailio fails to parse config file. yyparse(): misused command Ro_CCR yyerror_at(): parse error in config file //etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 1162, column 91: Command cannot be used in the block So two questions: 1) What constraints are there for calling functions in the failure_route blocks i.e. how does parser decide what can be called and what can't 2) Any thoughts of how I can do effectively a late charging decision Cheers and thanks in advance Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

1 1

ims_charging module
by Shane Harrison 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hi all ims'ers I have modified the ims_charging module to cope with the CCA return code of "CREDIT CONTROL NOT APPLICABLE". This means the call is not a chargeable call and the charging module now returns a unique return code for this. Currently there are two scenarios handled: 1) CCA grants the credit required for the call --> route the INVITE and then automatically new CCR requests are made for further credit as the call progresses 2) CCA doesn't grant the credit ---> send an error response back to INVITE originator - I assume this will clear all dialogs and no further credit requests are made. The question I have, is how do I cope with this unique return code so that I can continue to route the call but not make any more CCR requests to the credit control server? As I am not sure how the ims_charging module continues to generate CCR requests, it is difficult for me to understand how to essentially clear the whole CCR session without clearing the call. Kind regards Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

1 0

kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
by Slava Bendersky 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava.

2 1

Sipcapture module insert error
by Spencer Thomason 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I’m not sure if this is the correct forum for this question but here goes… I’m facing an issue setting up a sipcapture server. I’m seeing several db errors in the logs: Mar 6 10:45:13 sipcapture /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[37872]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:123]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Data too long for column 'correlation_id' at row 1 I did a packet capture of the sql query and it appears that the value for the correlation_id is omitted. Interestingly its not all packets but maybe 60%. Do I have something misconfigured? Thanks, Spencer A sanitized version of the query is below: insert into sip_capture (date,micro_ts,method,reply_reason,ruri,ruri_user,from_user,from_tag,to_user,to_tag,pid_user,contact_user,auth_user,callid,callid_aleg,via_1,via_1_branch,cseq,reason,content_type,auth,user_agent,source_ip,source_port,destination_ip,destination_port,contact_ip,contact_port,originator_ip,originator_port,proto,family,rtp_stat,type,node,correlation_id,msg ) values ('2015-03-06 10:50:22',1425667824109829,'180','Ringing','','','+12052222222','gK007b315d','+12051111111','3Sr0m4vyjy2UK','','+12051111111','','2080378443_116641441(a)1.1.1.1','','SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK00B5617ed64f1ebf7d7','z9hG4bK00B5617ed64f1ebf7d7','1888238783 INVITE','','','','','3.3.3.3',5060,'1.1.1.1',5060,'2.2.2.2',6038,'',0,1,2,'',2,'node1:2001','SIP/2.0 180 Ringing\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK00B5617ed64f1ebf7d7\r\nRecord-Route: <sip:3.3.3.3;lr;ftag=gK007b315d>\r\nFrom: <sip:+12052222222@1.1.1.1>;tag=gK007b315d\r\nTo: <sip:+12051111111@3.3.3.3>;tag=3Sr0m4vyjy2UK\r\nCall-ID: 2080378443_116641441(a)1.1.1.1\r\nCSeq: 1888238783 INVITE\r\nContact: <sip:+12051111111@2.2.2.2:6038;transport=udp>\r\nAccept: application/sdp\r\nAllow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE\r\nSupported: path\r\nContent-Length: 0\r\n\r\n','SIP/2.0 180 Ringing\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.1.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK00B5617ed64f1ebf7d7\r\nRecord-Route: <sip:3.3.3.3;lr;ftag=gK007b315d>\r\nFrom: <sip:+12052222222@1.1.1.1>;tag=gK007b315d\r\nTo: <sip:+12051111111@3.3.3.3>;tag=3Sr0m4vyjy2UK\r\nCall-ID: 2080378443_116641441(a)1.1.1.1\r\nCSeq: 1888238783 INVITE\r\nContact: <sip:+12051111111@2.2.2.2:6038;transport=udp>\r\nAccept: application/sdp\r\nAllow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE\r\nSupported: path\r\nContent-Length: 0\r\n\r\n')

2 2

building kamailio with MongoDB
by Tom Braarup Cuykens 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

I am trying to setup a Kamailio with MongoDB but the complilation fails: make include_modules="db_mongodb rtpproxy" cfg make all [...] In file included from mongodb_connection.c:24:0: mongodb_connection.h:26:20: fatal error: mongoc.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[1]: *** [mongodb_connection.o] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 1 I have build the mongodb C driver from https://github.com/mongodb/mongo-c-driver/ Not sure if the issue is related to the Kamailio MongoDB module or the Mongo C driver. -- Med venlig hilsen Tom Braarup Cuykens plusTEL.dk

2 1

kamailio 4.2.3 Segmentation fault when using db_cluster module
by Jan Hazenberg 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I have a issue on kamailio 4.2.3 when using the db_cluster module. I have the following config: #!define DBURL "cluster://cls1" # ----- db_cluster params ----- modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "con1=>mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@10.121.0.120/kamailio") modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "con2=>mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@10.121.0.121/kamailio") modparam("db_cluster", "connection", "con3=>mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@10.121.0.122/kamailio") modparam("db_cluster", "cluster", "cls1=>con1=9r8r;con2=9r8r;con3=9r8r") modparam("db_cluster", "inactive_interval", 180) modparam("db_cluster", "max_query_length", 5) # ----- sqlops params ----- modparam("sqlops","sqlcon","ca=>cluster://cls1") When i start kamailio it fails with: Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:54]: ob_load_api(): Failed to import bind_ob Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:160]: mod_init(): outbound module not available Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: usrloc [hslot.c:53]: ul_init_locks(): locks array size 1024 Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: permissions [parse_config.c:251]: parse_config_file(): file not found: /usr/local/etc/kamailio/permissions.allow Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: permissions [permissions.c:608]: mod_init(): default allow file (/usr/local/etc/kamailio/permissions.allow) not found => empty rule set Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: permissions [parse_config.c:251]: parse_config_file(): file not found: /usr/local/etc/kamailio/permissions.deny Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kamailio[31063]: INFO: permissions [permissions.c:617]: mod_init(): default deny file (/usr/local/etc/kamailio/permissions.deny) not found => empty rule set Mar 9 17:11:49 localhost kernel: kamailio[31063]: segfault at 80 ip 00007f7f4f9ffddc sp 00007fffde2f88a0 error 4 in db_cluster.so[7f7f4f9ec000+28000] Mar 9 17:11:50 localhost kamailio: ERROR: <core> [daemonize.c:315]: daemonize(): Main process exited before writing to pipe Could this be a bug or is this a configuration issue? I tested the dbnodes and they seem to respond fine to any query's i send. Thanks, Jan Hazenberg

3 8

SIP 500 on WSS connection lookup failure
by Armen Babikyan 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I am setting up this scenario using Kamailio 4.2.2: [UA] <-> [kamailio1] <-> [kamailio2] <-> [other stuff] UA connects to kamailio1 using SIP/WSS, kamailio1 proxies request along to kamailio2. Note that my intent here is to have kamailio2 provide the registrar functionality. The kamailio2 (or something behind it) can also initiate transactions to UA, like OPTIONS, for example. I'm having an issue though: when the websocket connection between kamailio1 and UA dies, transaction requests from kamailio2 show up to kamailio1, and I get errors in kamailio1's logs because the WSS connection is gone. I get messages as follows (debug=2): Mar 6 00:17:33 kamailio1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5653]: WARNING: <core> [msg_translator.c:2778]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found Mar 6 00:17:33 kamailio1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5653]: ERROR: <core> [msg_translator.c:1996]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header Mar 6 00:17:33 kamailio1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5653]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:527]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request Mar 6 00:17:33 kamailio1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5653]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1777]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches At debug=4, I get the output here: http://pastebin.com/d3RumekG In a running tshark, I see kamailio1 responding to kamailio2 with a "SIP/2.0 500 No error (2/TM)". It appears to me that this is happening before t_relay() even returns. Is there a way to prevent the SIP 500 from being sent back to the client? I am calling t_on_branch_failure("kam2bf") and t_on_failure("kam2f"), with each of those handlers (event_route[tm:branch-failure:kam2bf] and failure_route[kam2f]) written to print a log message, but it appears that neither of those handlers are being called. I tried installing these handlers independently to no avail. I also tried registering a t_on_reply() handler, thinking it was an internally-generated SIP response that might make it through my handler on its way out to kam2, but that is also not getting invoked. I want to return a 404 or something similar instead of having a 500 auto-returned for me. Related to this, is there a way to query kamailio's in-memory client connectivity data structure for the connectivity status of a client? Or is this something best done by keeping track of every client myself using (e.g.) localcache? Any pointers are appreciated. Thanks! Armen

2 3

help with a new install
by David Dunlap 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I am seeking help with a new test server. I have SIP messages coming from a working FreeSwitch and getting posted into the sip_capture table. Homer web service is responding allowing me to manage log on accounts and other database settings however I do not see any packets in the web gui. I used the install script from the web page and did not notice any errors as it worked. I sure would appreciate some help. The IRC channel was empty. Thanks David Dunlap [cid:D854C04A-3D89-4B99-AD05-D242790BFC94] 3105 N. Main St. East Peoria, IL 61611 Direct: 309-427-7226 Main: 309-427-7000 Fax: 309-427-7326 Email: ddunlap(a)heart.net www.heart.net

2 1

Transfer call between devices
by Phil Daws 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello: wish to ask how one may configure Kamailio so that if a user has a number of devices registered eg. deskphone, soft client on tablet, and soft client on cellphone when a call is originated or received how it can be passed between devices. Is it as simple as configuring a blind transfer ? Thanks for any help. Phil

2 1

4.2.3 textops: flag "f" doesn't work in subst_hf(hf, subexp, flags)
by Julia Boudniatsky 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I received INVITE with 3 Diversion headers. I try to make substitutions in the body of a first Diversion header field by using flag "f", command *subst_hf("Diversion", /sip:(.*)@/sip:$var(dU)@/", "f") ;* substitutes *all headers *Diversion instead of only first header, command *subst_hf("Diversion", /sip:(.*)@/sip:$var(dU)@/", "*l*") ;* substitutes only *last* Diversion header. Thanks for help, Julia.

2 3

core parsing of SIP message failed errors
by Jeff Cohn 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, I finally got everything working but see to consistently receive the following 3 errors (see below) over and over when a call is being collected? Versions: Homer 3.6 kamailio 4.3.0-dev4 Captagent 4.2.0 Any assistance would be appreciated. Thanks, Jeff ------------------------- Errors: Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: [parser/parse_fline.c:257]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message (offset: 0) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: [parser/msg_parser.c:688]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=> Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9921]: ERROR: [receive.c:129]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed (127.0.0.1:33264/1) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: [parser/parse_fline.c:257]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message (offset: 0) Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: [parser/msg_parser.c:688]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message= Mar 8 22:04:47 ce-homer2 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[9922]: ERROR: [receive.c:129]: receive_msg(): core parsing of SIP message failed (127.0.0.1:33264/1)

2 4

We’ve got free Tickets for CeBIT 2015!
by Carsten Bock 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hi, Due to our presentation at CeBIT 2015 at the Open-Source Business Alliance’s Booth, we’ve received a limited number of free tickets for CeBIT 2015! If you want a free ticket, please answer the following question: - What is the key benefit of deploying VoLTE in a mobile network? Send your answer to info(a)ng-voice.com (hint: we’ve got some benefits posted on our website: www.ng-voice.com/volte), I will send the ticket by email to the 5 best answers! Don’t miss my presentation on Kamailio & VoLTE at the booth of the Open-Source Business Alliance (www.osb-alliance.de), Tuesday, March 17th, ~2 PM, Hall 6, Stand H16, (410)! Thanks, Carsten -- Carsten Bock CEO (Geschäftsführer) ng-voice GmbH Schomburgstr. 80 D-22767 Hamburg / Germany http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com Office +49 40 5247593-0 Fax +49 40 5247593-99 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189 Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock Ust-ID: DE279344284 Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben: http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/

2 1

WARNING when querying data using db_mongodb
by Mickael Marrache 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hi, I'm continuously seeing the following WARNING in my logs: WARNING: db_mongodb [mongodb_dbase.c:454]: db_mongodb_get_columns(): unhandled data type column (instance) type id (10), use DB1_STRING as default It looks like the WARNING appears when data is fetched from the location collection. The instance field is always null in my case. Thanks, Mickael

2 1

Regd. Kamailio GPL
by Shankar 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hello, We are exploring kamailio source for use in our VOIP solution. This is the first time we are looking at open source. We have few doubts in using kamailio for providing our VOIP service. Under GPL any customization (customization mainly with respect to interacting with our proprietary applications e.g. Billing server) we do to kamailio also has to be provided to the end user. Our doubt is whether we can procure commercial rights to our customised code? Kindly clarify on this. Best Regards, Shankar

1 0

Dialog order of operations
by Alex Balashov 10 Mar '15

10 Mar '15

Hi, The dialog module documentation remains unclear about the order of operations with regard to when to call dlg_manage() or set the transaction flag. My impression is that dlg_manage() only registered TM callbacks, so it doesn't matter when you call it, as long as it's before t_relay(). However, the documentation neither confirms nor denies this. So, this raises the questions: 1) Is this okay? set_dlg_profile("caller", "$fU"); dlg_manage(); ... t_relay(); Or do I need to do this? dlg_manage(); set_dlg_profile("caller", "$fU"); ... t_relay(); 2) What about setting dialog-persistent variables? Is this okay? $dlg_var(account_id) = 49555; dlg_manage(); If so, where does the variable go if I never call dlg_manage() because the call is aborted beforehand, e.g. $dlg_var(account_id) = 49555; sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); exit; dlg_manage(); ... t_relay(); 3) Any other gotchas or caveats in relation to the order of operations? I suppose my preference would be to set the dialog profiles in various places throughout call processing and call dlg_manage() at the very end, right before t_relay(). Is this acceptable? Thanks, -- Alex -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

2 9

Announcing rtpproxy v2.0.0
by Maxim Sobolev 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

Hi All, I'm happy to announce that we have released rtpproxy v2.0.0. You can review the release notes here: https://github.com/sippy/rtpproxy/releases/tag/v2.0.0 -sobomax

1 0

Enable SNMP causes issue when forking exec_avp request
by Daniel Goepp 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

I have an issue that from what I can tell is related to forking. My configuration works just fine, and makes a request out to execute curl to hit an external API: $var(my_query) = "curl -m 2 -s http://x.x.x.x/service/method?fromAddr=" + $var(fu) + "\&toAddr=" + $var(tu); Normally this gives us back a nice JSON response, no problems. All I do is enable snmpstats module, and it fails. Mar 5 16:51:30 server-name /usr/sbin/kamailio[1051]: ERROR: exec [exec.c:291]: exec_avp(): cmd curl -m 2 -s http://x.x.x.x/service/method?fromAddr=me@mydomain.com\&toAddr=someone@mydo… failed. exit_status=-1, errno=10: No child processes I have edited this for security reasons of course. If I disable SNMP, the problem goes away. Thoughts?

2 1

rtpproxy failed to load
by Tom Braarup Cuykens 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

kb.asipto.com/kamailio:skype-like-service-in-less-than-one-hour I found this guide for an older version of Kamailio, but there seems to be some issues when trying to use it on the latest stable version. When I try to start Kamailio i get this : [....] 0(17153) INFO: tls [tls_init.c:399]: init_tls_compression(): tls: init_tls: disabling compression... 0(17153) ERROR: <core> [cfg.y:3286]: yyparse(): cfg. parser: failed to find command force_rtp_proxy (params 0) 0(17153) : <core> [cfg.y:3426]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 729, column 19: unknown command, missing loadmodule? 0(17153) ERROR: <core> [cfg.y:3286]: yyparse(): cfg. parser: failed to find command force_rtp_proxy (params 0) 0(17153) : <core> [cfg.y:3426]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config fil[FAILc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 806, column 19: unknown command, missing loadmodule? ERROR: bad config file (2 errors) ... It seems it cannot load the rtpproxy module or that force_rtp_proxy command does not exist. For Debian the modules are located in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/ and it was found there, seems to be loaded in the config file (line 5 and 235). According to the rtpproxy doc the module has this command. Does anyone have an idea what could be the issue ? I am planning to update this guide for the current version once I fixed all the issues. The most easy issues are the db/usernames/password and the path to the modules. -- Med venlig hilsen Tom Braarup Cuykens plusTEL.dk

2 1

lua_run seems to be working in asynchronous way
by José Seabra 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

Hi there, I'm using kamailio version 4.2.2 to a short time, and I'm using lua scripts to build some avps with information needed to make calls(lua functions uses redis as source data to build avp data.), what i have noticed today making some tests is that when i make a call my lua function: if(!lua_run("get_prefs","$fU","$fd")) { xdbg("SCRIPT: failed to execute lua function!\n"); } kamailio gets the avp's after send the invite to the destine,(the invite will fail because kamailio needs avp information). it seems that kamailio calls the lua_run in asynchronous way, i never noticed that before in old version. is that a normal behavior or it is an issue in this version? Best Regards -- Cumprimentos José Seabra

2 5

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 08 Mar '15

08 Mar '15

Hello Everyone, I set up tcp and udp for right now to test all config and dialog is not established correctly. Call between extensions not working. Call from extesnsion to extension going right a way to voicemail. Any help thank you. Here one call debug. http://fpaste.org/195572/14258553/ Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:08:19 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, Is notify should follow subscribe routes ? Here SUBSCRIBE completely look normal to me. <--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SUBSCRIBE sip:10102@networklab.ca SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:kamailio_pub_ip:5081;transport=tls;lr=on;ftag=08c99307d3;nat=yes> Accept: application/simple-message-summary Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKdee2.b83c2028dc57c641d2b8cad968347d6a.0;i=2 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.0.16:5063;rport=5063;received=client_pub_ip;branch=z9hG4bK0c54032bd8905d262 Max-Forwards: 69 From: "10102" <sips:10102@networklab.ca>;tag=08c99307d3 To: <sips:10102@networklab.ca> Call-ID: cea703eb8c21f709 CSeq: 1096440084 SUBSCRIBE Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE, MESSAGE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Allow-Events: message-summary Authorization: Digest username="10102",realm="networklab.ca",nonce="29ac01f1",uri="sips:10102@networklab.ca",response="0298c2a93bdd4969a3cd0b757d671dbb",algorithm=MD5 Contact: <sips:10102@client_pub_ip:5063>;audio Event: message-summary Expires: 3600 Supported: eventlist, replaces, timer User-Agent: Media5-fone/4.1.6.3283 Android/4.1.2 Content-Length: 0 Path: <sip:outbound@10.18.130.46;lr;received=sip:client_pub_ip:5063%3Btransport%3Dtls> P-hint: outbound Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 1:50:03 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I pushed a fix for it -- the issue was in a LM_DBG() trying to print te address for local socket, but it was not set yet, it was affecting only when running in debug mode with debug=3. I pushed the patch to branch 4.2, so if you want the fix, then you have to install from git branch 4.2. For REGISTER, you need to add the Path header (see path module), otherwise the OPTIONS and INVITE sent out to the phone are not going via Kamailio. You have to check the version of your Asterisk to be one that supports Path. Cheers, Daniel On 27/02/15 14:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( soft phone) send OPTIONS or NOTIFY can't get properly relay it. This is SUBSCRIBE route. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.88.252:5062;received=Client public ip;branch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:PUBLIC_KAMAILIO_IP:5081;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca> ;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca> ;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060> ;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was already sent before -- I wanted the output from gdb for: p *tcpconn Daniel On 27/02/15 04:10, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips : . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

1 0

Group call advice: remove calling branch after alias_db_lookup/lookup_branches
by Anthony Messina 08 Mar '15

08 Mar '15

In terms of implementing "group" calling via the append_branch feature of both alias_db_lookup followed by lookup_branches, I'm looking for a reliable way to ensure that if the caller happens to be a member of the group (list of branches), the branch that's created to the original caller is dropped. Originally, I was thinking of comparing $rU and $fU in branch_route, but this would limit the ability for one contact of an AOR to call another contact of the same AOR. Can anyone offer an example of an efficient method to accomplish this? -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

2 3

ndb_redis set <null> reply to EXISTS query
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 06 Mar '15

06 Mar '15

Hello I try to get some replies from redis. Time after time redis request give me null result. But redis bs not disconnected. This happens only with websocket endpoints. My queries is: redis_cmd("srv1", "EXISTS $si", "s"); So at xLOG i see that $si correctly sended, but result is null. At db I keep key IP with value TIMESTAMP Intresting that route, that givesme this result idependend of WS or UDP endpoint. IT does not know about it anything.

2 11

Route Between WebSockets without rtpengine getting into the mix
by Don Fanning 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Hello All, Prior to going down the rtpengine path for another need, calling was working fine between WSS client. Now that I've added in some pieces from caruizdiaz's config [ https://github.com/caruizdiaz/kamailio-ws/blob/master/kamailio-ws.cfg] relating to SETUP_BY_TRANSPORT, it has broken that functionality. Is there a way to skip rtpengine if the originator and destination are both on wss? route[RELAY] { # enable additional event routes for forwarded requests # - serial forking, RTP relaying handling, a.s.o. if (is_method("INVITE|BYE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE")) { t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH"); t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY"); } if (is_method("INVITE")) { route(SETUP_BY_TRANSPORT); if(!t_is_set("failure_route")) t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } route[SETUP_BY_TRANSPORT] { if ($ru =~ "transport=ws") { xlog("L_INFO", "Request going to WS"); if(sdp_with_transport("RTP/SAVPF")) { rtpengine_manage("rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force DTLS=passive"); t_on_reply("REPLY_WS_TO_WS"); return; } #rtpengine_manage("rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=force DTLS=passive RTP/SAVP"); t_on_reply("REPLY_FROM_WS"); } else if ($proto =~ "ws") { xlog("L_INFO", "Request coming from WS"); rtpengine_manage("rtcp-mux-demux trust-address replace-origin replace-session-connection ICE=remove DTLS=passive RTP/SAVP"); t_on_reply("REPLY_TO_WS"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "This is a classic phone call"); rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection"); t_on_reply("MANAGE_CLASSIC_REPLY"); } } Thanks for any help! -Don

2 1

segfault problem with unixodbc module
by Lucas Wals Ochoa 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Hello, this is the first time I send a question here, hope my english is good enough to explain my problem. I have a Kamailio 4.1.8+RTPProxy setup working, but recently I saw RTP Engine proxy, so I decided to give a try. I installed the latest kamailio stable version (4.2.3) and adapt the configuration I have(that uses a MariaDB database), to try the rtpengine module, but I couldn't even start kamailio process, cause I received a segfault problem at unixodbc module. The version of unixodbc that I installed is 2.3.1-10 That was the first time I encounter this error. I thought that maybe the database I have created with the version 4.1.8 wasn't compatible, so I decided to create a new database, but the problem persisted. So I'm here to know if someone know something about this, or have had a similar problem. I attached the system log for Kamailio, and a backtrace I made using "gdb" with the corefile that Kamailio creates when it crash. Log: Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost systemd: Starting SYSV: Kamailio is a fast, reliable and flexible SIP Server.... Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost kamailio: WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:1392]: fix_hostname(): could not rev. resolve 10.0.0.70 Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: WARNING: tm [tm.c:845]: mod_init(): WARNING: mod_init: reparse_on_dns_failover is enabled on a multihomed host -- check the readme of tm module! Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:54]: ob_load_api(): Failed to import bind_ob Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:160]: mod_init(): outbound module not available Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: INFO: usrloc [hslot.c:53]: ul_init_locks(): locks array size 1024 Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[2369]: INFO: auth [auth_mod.c:350]: mod_init(): auth: qop set, but nonce-count (nc_enabled) support disabled Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost kernel: kamailio[2369]: segfault at 10070 ip 00007fc3d554df7e sp 00007fff89556450 error 4 in libmyodbc5w.so[7fc3d5527000+47000] Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost kamailio: ERROR: <core> [daemonize.c:315]: daemonize(): Main process exited before writing to pipe Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost kamailio: Starting kamailio: Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost systemd: kamailio.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1 Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost systemd: Failed to start SYSV: Kamailio is a fast, reliable and flexible SIP Server.. Mar 4 12:46:35 localhost systemd: Unit kamailio.service entered failed state. Backtrace of gdb: Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio.pid -m 64 -M 8 -u kamailio -g kamailio'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007fc3d554df7e in get_ctype () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install kamailio-4.2.3-3.1.x86_64 (gdb) backtrace #0 0x00007fc3d554df7e in get_ctype () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #1 0x00007fc3d554dfac in init_parser () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #2 0x00007fc3d554ec41 in parse () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #3 0x00007fc3d5553484 in prepare () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #4 0x00007fc3d5559e9c in SQLPrepareWImpl () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #5 0x00007fc3d5559eb9 in SQLExecDirectW () from /usr/lib64/libmyodbc5.so #6 0x00007fc3de43b05f in SQLExecDirect () from /lib64/libodbc.so.2 #7 0x00007fc3de695302 in db_unixodbc_submit_query () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/db_unixodbc.so #8 0x00007fc3de21522e in db_do_submit_query () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb1.so.1 #9 0x00007fc3de215cf7 in db_do_query_internal () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb1.so.1 #10 0x00007fc3de21661a in db_do_query () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb1.so.1 #11 0x00007fc3de696d90 in db_unixodbc_query () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/db_unixodbc.so #12 0x00007fc3de20ce90 in db_table_version () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb1.so.1 #13 0x00007fc3da209693 in init_ds_db () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/dispatcher.so #14 0x00007fc3da1f4f1a in mod_init () from /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/dispatcher.so #15 0x0000000000520e8d in init_mod () #16 0x0000000000520be8 in init_mod () #17 0x000000000052119a in init_modules () #18 0x0000000000517951 in main () Hope someone can help me. Thanks in advance.

3 5

WARNING: <core> [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added"?
by Anthony Messina 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Good day. Is anyone able to let me in on what this means "WARNING: <core> [local_timer.c:83]: _local_timer_dist_tl(): 0 expire timer added"? I just started seeing this after pulling down 5c1a9df from git and it seems like something that I probably don't want happening. -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

3 13

wss calls between devices works but strange error
by Don Fanning 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Hi All, I'm placing calls between two devices over WSS and sipML5. Connection seems to work and stays up (despite some grumbling sometimes with 603 failed to get local SDP) but my question is the following log entries - could someone translate what is happening here? Thanks! Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:19 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:21 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:25 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4917]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:33 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: INFO: <script>: Request in RELAY - call is {<null>} for {106E} Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 127.0.0.2:5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 127.0.0.1, using default... Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 127.0.0.2:5061 failed (RST) Connection refused Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 127.0.0.2:5061: connect & send for 0x7f0eb3944ac0 failed: Connection refused (111) Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Mar 5 03:35:49 sandbox /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4918]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL)

2 1

How to Use Multiple DMQ Notification Addresses
by Robert Boisvert 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hello all, I would like to setup a DMQ bus where servers can come on and offline and have DMQ continue working with the online servers. I'm having trouble understanding how to do that with the notification address. Can someone point me in the right direction? More specifically, suppose I have five servers named A, B, C, D, and E. I would like all of them to be on the DMQ bus when active but they may come up at different times. For example, when A, B and C start I want each of them to be on the same DMQ bus. However, the way I understand it, if I make E the notification address none will be on the bus because E is not active. I could create a circular notification chain where A uses B as a notification server, B uses C, and so on. Of course, there are problems when one or more servers are missing from the chain. Any help on this is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Bob

2 3

SCA fails to update appearance
by Andreas Granig 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi guys, Playing with SCA for the first time, I'm hittin the following issue: User phone1(a)domain.org is registered on two devices A and B, and device B sends SUBSCRIBE to phone1(a)domain.org with call-info Event. Subscription is handled properly, and my DB content is this: id: 4 subscriber: sip:phone1@10.15.20.174:5100;alias=1.2.3.4~5100~1 aor: sip:phone1@domain.org event: 1 expires: 1425296906 state: 0 app_idx: 0 call_id: dacf5194-3d6a8e16d03338102a940080f0e9071c(a)10.15.20.174 from_tag: 4247246264 to_tag: f3067022b00c564156251ba2f28f331f-7c92 record_route: <sip:127.0.0.1;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=4247246264;nat=yes;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:1.2.3.4:5060>,<sip:1.2.3.4;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=4247246264;nat=yes;ngcplb=yes;socket=udp:1.2.3.4:5060> notify_cseq: 3 subscribe_cseq: 2 Kamcmd reports this: kamcmd> sca.all_subscriptions phone1 10.15.20.174:5100 call-info 2697 active If phone1(a)domain.org on device A does a call, I get this in my logs when calling sca_call_info_update() right as first thing in my routing config handling the INVITE: Mar 2 12:02:33 sp2 proxy[34517]: WARNING: sca [sca_appearance.c:976]: sca_appearance_update_index(): Cannot update sip:phone1@domain.org index 0 to unknown: index 0 not in use Mar 2 12:02:33 sp2 proxy[34517]: ERROR: sca [sca_call_info.c:1046]: sca_call_info_invite_request_handler(): Failed to update sip:phone1@domain.org appearance-index 0 to unknown Is there something I'm obviously doing wrong here? Andreas

2 4

switch called number
by jaflong jaflong 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi Guys I want to archive this setup Kamailio to switch called number and the switch to be hidden from the client so there should be no mention of the switched number in any of the messages back to the client. for example phone client calls "alex" kamailio to switch "alex" to "54321" and send to asterisk on response from asterisk, kamailio to revert all references to "54321" back to "alex" before send to client Any suggestions please

2 1

TLS conversion
by Kelvin Chua 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

I have 2 kamailio servers and 1 asterisk server. 1. asterisk calls kamailio1 2. kamailio1 relays INVITE to kamailio2 3. kamailio2 relays INVITE to client registered using TLS 4. client answers with 200 OK, sends to kamailio2 5. kamailio2 relays 200 OK to kamailio1 6. kamailio1 relays 200 OK to asterisk 7. asterisk sends ACK to kamailio1 8. kamailio1 complains "forward_request(): forward_req: ERROR: cannot forward to af 2, proto 3 no corresponding listening socket" which is because 200 OK has a contact header with tls transport from client 9. call drops in 30 secs which is expected because client never received the ACK any ideas on a fix or workaround? Kelvin Chua

2 7

Any suggestion if I just want to update one or some modules?
by jack wang 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

For example, If I modify only the registrar module, I thought the steps were: 1. make modules=modules\registrar modules 2. copy the registrar.so to the installed path And when starting kamailio I got the error message below: ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:417]: version_control(): ERROR: module compile flags mismatch for [my installed path]/registrar.so I've searched for the answer and it seems to need to re-build and re-install kamailio and all the module again... Is there more efficient way for just updating the specified module ?? Thanks a lot.:)

2 2

Can following scenario be implemented using Kamilio
by Jayanth Acharya 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Would like to know if Kamilio (in it's sip-proxy role) could be configured to somehow take note of the 'Contact:' header of a 302 response from B-party, to forward the INVITE to C-party (specified by the updated Contact URI) ? Alternatively, is there a way for the B-party SIP UAS to get the proxy (Kamilio) to forward the INVITE (from A-party) to C-party ? Does Kamilio have to be configured to act in a specific / non-default role ? In doing so, B-party receives no further SIP messages for this particular dialog. thanks, J

3 14

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Is notify should follow subscribe routes ? Here SUBSCRIBE completely look normal to me. <--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SUBSCRIBE sip:10102@networklab.ca SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:kamailio_pub_ip:5081;transport=tls;lr=on;ftag=08c99307d3;nat=yes> Accept: application/simple-message-summary Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKdee2.b83c2028dc57c641d2b8cad968347d6a.0;i=2 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.0.16:5063;rport=5063;received=client_pub_ip;branch=z9hG4bK0c54032bd8905d262 Max-Forwards: 69 From: "10102" <sips:10102@networklab.ca>;tag=08c99307d3 To: <sips:10102@networklab.ca> Call-ID: cea703eb8c21f709 CSeq: 1096440084 SUBSCRIBE Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE, MESSAGE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, UPDATE Allow-Events: message-summary Authorization: Digest username="10102",realm="networklab.ca",nonce="29ac01f1",uri="sips:10102@networklab.ca",response="0298c2a93bdd4969a3cd0b757d671dbb",algorithm=MD5 Contact: <sips:10102@client_pub_ip:5063>;audio Event: message-summary Expires: 3600 Supported: eventlist, replaces, timer User-Agent: Media5-fone/4.1.6.3283 Android/4.1.2 Content-Length: 0 Path: <sip:outbound@10.18.130.46;lr;received=sip:client_pub_ip:5063%3Btransport%3Dtls> P-hint: outbound Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 1:50:03 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I pushed a fix for it -- the issue was in a LM_DBG() trying to print te address for local socket, but it was not set yet, it was affecting only when running in debug mode with debug=3. I pushed the patch to branch 4.2, so if you want the fix, then you have to install from git branch 4.2. For REGISTER, you need to add the Path header (see path module), otherwise the OPTIONS and INVITE sent out to the phone are not going via Kamailio. You have to check the version of your Asterisk to be one that supports Path. Cheers, Daniel On 27/02/15 14:40, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( soft phone) send OPTIONS or NOTIFY can't get properly relay it. This is SUBSCRIBE route. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.88.252:5062;received=Client public ip;branch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:PUBLIC_KAMAILIO_IP:5081;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca> ;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca> ;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060> ;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was already sent before -- I wanted the output from gdb for: p *tcpconn Daniel On 27/02/15 04:10, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips : . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

REmove Header line with tags
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

I need to remove all header line witht tags but remove_hf() removes only Header:value All tags after ";" stay at the packet as garbage and next Header moves up As there ACK sip:12345678900@phone.provider.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip.server.com:5068 ;branch=z9hG4bKcb7a.9f70ce5990dd153cd0eaa6f1762c059c.0.cs102 *<There var another Via header that I removed with remove_hf_re but tags is stiil there and Route header mover up>*;rport=1578;received=23.101.134.111Route: <sip:54.241.2.206;lr=on;ftag=as38f20f7b;did=ce8.10a> Max-Forwards: 70 From: "New User" <sip:00987654321@phone.provider.com>;tag=as38f20f7b To: <sip:12345678900@phone.provider.com>;tag=B4r1B569001DB Contact: <sip:contact@10.0.1.17:50600;alias=23.101.134.111~1578~1> Call-ID: 473fc8a64d7d96aa515780dc6237a6d5@10.0.1.17:50600 CSeq: 103 ACK User-Agent: Some Device Content-Length: 0

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 03 Mar '15

03 Mar '15

Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( soft phone) send OPTIONS or NOTIFY can't get properly relay it. This is SUBSCRIBE route. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.88.252:5062;received=Client public ip;branch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:PUBLIC_KAMAILIO_IP:5081;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060>;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was already sent before -- I wanted the output from gdb for: p *tcpconn Daniel On 27/02/15 04:10, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips : . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Kamailio as a SIP softphone to WebRTC/SIP-over-websockets proxy?
by Rion Carter 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

I'm pretty new to SIP, RTP/SRTP, WebRTC and Websockets, so I hope this question is coherent. I have a group of SIP Softphones that need to connect to a WebRTC/SIP-over-Websockets server. Can Kamailio be configured to let me do this? Any examples, tutorials or documentation would be appreciated. I'm trying to determine how feasible this task is. :) Thanks!

2 2

db_mysql errors
by jaflong jaflong 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

I am getting errors when I run the following code if (sql_xquery("mydb", "select * from account where account = 'demo'", "res") == 1) { xlog("L_INFO", "my number: $xavp(res=>number)\n"); } else { xlog("L_WARN", "Connection forbidden from $si\n"); sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); exit; } sql_result_free("res"); } 10(4033) ERROR: <core> [db_ut.c:225]: db_str2time(): Error during time conversion 10(4033) ERROR: <core> [db_val.c:159]: db_str2val(): error while converting datetime value from string 10(4033) ERROR: db_mysql [km_row.c:68]: db_mysql_convert_row(): failed to convert value 10(4033) ERROR: db_mysql [km_res.c:190]: db_mysql_convert_rows(): error while converting row #0 10(4033) ERROR: db_mysql [km_res.c:219]: db_mysql_convert_result(): error while converting rows 10(4033) ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:252]: db_mysql_store_result(): error while converting result 10(4033) ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:188]: db_do_raw_query(): error while storing result10(4033) ERROR: sqlops [sql_api.c:454]: sql_exec_xquery(): cannot do the query Any help please

2 3

kamctl: command not available
by Thomas Baeumer 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

Hi there, I want to use kamctl to monitor the state of a sip-proxy. I just have no idea which commands are available or should i use "kamctl mi" or "kamctl fifo" commands. Google dont give helpful links for that. Im am using kamailio 4.2.3+wheezy on a Debian wheezy and kamctrl dont work: # kamctl fifo uptime Control engine 'FIFO' loaded entering fifo_cmd uptime 500 command 'uptime' not available FIFO command was: :uptime:kamailio_receiver_19959 # kamctl fifo which Control engine 'FIFO' loaded entering fifo_cmd which 500 command 'which' not available FIFO command was: :which:kamailio_receiver_19985 # kamctl mi which Control engine 'FIFO' loaded entering fifo_cmd which 500 command 'which' not available FIFO command was: :which:kamailio_receiver_20016 here is my config: # grep -i fifo kamailio.cfg loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_fifo") modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_user", "kamailio") modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_mode", 0640) # ls -la /tmp/kam* srw-r----- 1 kamailio root 0 Feb 27 12:39 /tmp/kamailio_ctl prw-r----- 1 kamailio kamailio 0 Feb 27 14:25 /tmp/kamailio_fifo The only known command what is working is to look into a hashtable: # kamctl mi sht_dump foo Control engine 'FIFO' loaded entering fifo_cmd sht_dump foo Entry:: 135 sip:0049xxxxxxxxxxx@sip.domain.tld:: 1 Entry:: 205 sip:0049yyyyyyyyyyy@sip.domain.tld:: 1 FIFO command was: :sht_dump:kamailio_receiver_20144 foo any idea what is wrong? and is there a documentation how to use "kamcrl mi" and "kamctl fifo"? Thanks Thomas

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + SIP Over WebSocket examples
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

Hello, sr-users is the mailing list more appropriate for such discussions that the docs. However, you wrote to -owner address which is not the mailing list discussions address but mailing list control address. For the topic, look at the readme of the websocket module, it gives a sample for starting with webrtc. On github (search for), Carlos Ruiz Diaz has some more advanced examples. Cheers, Daniel On 02/03/15 06:48, vineet wrote: > Hi Geeks, > > I was trying to search the good article, blog or tutorials to get > working Kamailio + WEBRTC model i have found some but those are not > worth it to me because I am beginner on it. Folk if anyone has > experience about it or having an idea about it, please refer or > forward to me. > > Thanks In advance. > > Best Regards, > -Vineet > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 2

Kamailio + SIP Over WebSocket examples
by vineet 02 Mar '15

02 Mar '15

Hi Geeks, I was trying to search the good article, blog or tutorials to get working Kamailio + WEBRTC model i have found some but those are not worth it to me because I am beginner on it. Folk if anyone has experience about it or having an idea about it, please refer or forward to me. Thanks In advance . Best Regards, -Vineet

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 28 Feb '15

28 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, Trying resolve issue with NOTIFY and OPTIONS that it will be send to client through kamailio from asterisk. 1. SUBSCRIBE record routes (works). On asterisk I see two records routes. 2. NOTIFY from asterisk should re use Records routes from SUBSCRIBE and send it to the client (works). I see in asterisk logs Route record. 3. NOTIFY received, but kamailio should send to client (not working). I see To: private Ip of the client or #4. 4. NOTIFY|OPTIONS sips to sip translation (not working). I see To: <sip:sips: none substr_uri helps include $rz. Here SDP conversation. http://fpaste.org/191761/14251457/ Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2740]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect 192.168.88.252:5064 failed (RST) Connection refused Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:2750]: tcpconn_1st_send(): 192.168.88.252:5064: connect & send for 0x7f00ed4a1228 failed: Connection refused (111) Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: ERROR: tm [../../forward.h:247]: msg_send(): tcp_send failed Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: WARNING: tm [t_fwd.c:1608]: t_send_branch(): ERROR: t_send_branch: sending request on branch 0 failed Feb 28 12:54:58 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[12838]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/SL) Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 8:40:10 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( soft phone) send OPTIONS or NOTIFY can't get properly relay it. This is SUBSCRIBE route. <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.46;branch=z9hG4bKf852.e0223f39c2bbad8366fdf1b7cb22b336.0;i=8;received=10.18.130.46;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.88.252:5062;received=Client public ip;branch=z9hG4bK0bbe1f7d27257bba9;rport=5062 Record-Route: <sip:10.18.130.46;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:PUBLIC_KAMAILIO_IP:5081;transport=tls;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=a185d974ec;nat=yes> From: "Slava Bendersky" <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=a185d974ec To: <sips:10101@networklab.ca>;tag=as00757d3e Call-ID: b08adb1ad1804a83 CSeq: 236711034 SUBSCRIBE Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:10101@10.18.130.50:5060>;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was already sent before -- I wanted the output from gdb for: p *tcpconn Daniel On 27/02/15 04:10, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips : . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

1 0

Keeping Registrations alive in IPv6 scenarios
by Sebastian Damm 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Hi, while testing IPv6 with customers, we fell over quite a few cases, where customers aren't reachable on inbound calls most of the time. And digging into this, we found the home router firewall as the cause for those problems. Normally, you would think, all the NAT problems cease when switching to IPv6. But actually, right now I don't know how to fix that problem. In IPv4 NAT scenarios, we would flag the customer during the registration, and Kamailio would send NAT pings (those 4 bytes of UDP junk) every few seconds to keep the firewall in the NAT router open. And that worked pretty great. Now we have IPv6. We don't have NAT. But we still have a home router in front of SIP devices, with a firewall. And this firewall will allow outbound traffic. But after a few seconds it won't allow incoming connections anymore. And the routers I have seen so far don't have a configurable firewall where you could allow inbound traffic from our server. Unfortunately, only our load balancer is IPv6, our registrar is still IPv4 only. And the loadbalancer doesn't know anything about registrations and which customer needs an IPv6 keepalive. Does anyone have a hint, how to keep the IPv6 registrations alive? Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Sebastian

5 12

TEXTOPS parser problem with binary data in MIME body
by Federico San Martín 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Hi Klaus, did you find a solution to this problem? I'm working with SIP-I and having the same issue with Binary encoding. I need to encode a 0x00 value and when the config script gets to that point, it breaks. If I encode any other hex value it's fine. This is the config part I'm using: route[INSERT_ACM]{ if(has_body()){ # Save the SDP body for future reference $var(sdp_body) = $rb; replace_body_atonce("^.+$", ""); remove_hf("Content-Type"); append_hf("MIME-Version: 1.0\r\n", "Content-Length"); append_hf("Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=unique-boundary-1\r\n", "Allow"); replace_body_atonce("^.+$", "--unique-boundary-1\r\nContent-Disposition: signal; handling=optional\r\nContent-Type: application/isup; version=itu-t92+\r\n\r\n'\x06''\x02''\x04''\x01''\x29''\x01''\x01''\x00'\r\n-unique-boundary-1\r\n"); msg_apply_changes(); replace_body_all("\047", ""); append_body_part("$var(sdp_body)","application/sdp"); } return; } I tried with the escape character \0 which should be translated to ASCII hex value '00' but it's parsed as ASCII literal values \0... Thanks! Federico Federico San Martín e-mail : fsanmartin(a)telecentro.net.ar On 9/17/13 4:34 PM, Daniel wrote: > Hello, > > most of the functions for pseudo-variables work with string types, that > because a script variable can have only integer or string values. Even > the length can be higher, these functions truncate at first 0. But > internally all should be kept, just not passed to config variables. > > Have you tried exec_msg(), that should pass entire msg? > > Otherwise, I presume there is need for some C coding to make binary > values work with variables in config. > > Cheers, > Daniel On 9/17/13 4:03 PM, Klaus Feichtinger wrote: > Hello, > > I have an update to the side effects of receiving an INVITE message that > contains a MIME body with binary data: > - pseudo variables are affected, too > - the message buffer ($mb) does not include the whole message; it is > ending with the nul character > - as the message buffer does not include all data, the modification > cannot be done with an external script / program (e.g. perl, bash script) > > The behaviour was tested with kamailio 4.0.3, too - no difference! > > In general, the whole message is stored in a buffer, but parts of it are > inaccessible for parsing / text functions. > > Any idea, what could cause this problem? > > regards, > Klaus > >> Hello, >> >> I have a problem with Kamailio version 3.2.4 (tested also with 3.3.5) >> regarding "binary data" in message bodies. According RFC3261 it is >> explicitly allowed using binary data within MIME bodies: >> >> RFC 3261 section 7.4.1: SIP messages MAY contain binary bodies or body >> parts. When no explicit charset parameter is provided by the sender, >> media subtypes of the "text" type are defined to have a default charset >> value of "UTF-8". >> >> However, the Kamailio function "Regular Expression Transformation" >> (re.subst), which is based on the transformation class (exported by the >> textops module) is causing problems in our customer system. In regular >> scenarios, Kamailio is receiving SIP INVITE messages with a MIME body, >> which is containing following parts: >> - application/sdp (standard conform) >> - application/x-q931 (Cisco proprietary with BINARY data!) >> - application/gtd (Cisco proprietary with ASCII strings) >> >> The content of the "x-q931" and "gtd" body parts is depending on (UUS1) >> data that were received on the ISDN line. Kamailio has to forward >> User-User specific information from the ISDN line to SIP user agents (in >> form of the "User-to-User" header field). The content of these UUS1 data >> may contain also byte values "00", which is legitimate. In general, >> Kamailio is in every INVITE message searching specific content in the >> last body (application/gtd) and copying this content to a config >> variable. As soon as the x-q931 body contains nul values (0x00 in binary >> format), the parser stops at this position and cannot parse the rest of >> the message. Therefore, I am missing the information that should be >> copied to the SIP header field, as the parser stops before the end of >> the message body! >> >> As long as the message body does not contain 0x00, it is working fine! >> >> My question is: >> - is this a bug in Kamailio parsing functions? >> - is this a design issue of Kamailio text parsers (as binary data are >> allowed acc. RFC3261) - does anybody know a solution for this problem? >> This "bug" is causing big troubles.... >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Klaus Feichtinger >> >> >> P.S. trace data (1)...(3) of my problem >> >> (1) exemplary content of the x-q931 body >> ======================Sending: Binary Message Body >> Sep 13 10:50:19: Content-Type: application/x-q931 >> 08 01 B4 05 04 03 80 90 A2 18 01 89 1E 02 82 88 6C 05 B1 35 30 30 34 70 >> 05 B1 35 30 30 31 7D 02 91 81 7E 18 04 1D 42 75 25 92 43 31 62 94 00 00 >> 2C 68 20 64 00 62 F2 10 41 B9 D7 BD 0D 0A >> >> (2) SIP INVITE message (debugger view) >> =============================INVITE sip:115101@<ipv4>:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: >> SIP/2.0/UDP <ipv4>:5060;branch=z9hG4bK171164E >> From: <sip:1101015004@<ipv4>>;tag=29E16410-2541 >> To: <sip:115101@<ipv4>> >> Call-ID: 1DBCDACB-1B9911E3-8992FF70-D2BED293@<ipv4> >> Supported: timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat >> Min-SE: 90 >> CSeq: 101 INVITE >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> Contact: <sip:1101015004@<ipv4>:5060> >> Expires: 1800 >> P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:1101015004@<ipv4>> >> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=uniqueBoundary >> Mime-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Length: 820 >> >> --uniqueBoundary >> Content-Type: application/sdp >> Content-Disposition: session;handling=required >> >> v=0 >> o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 1770 5294 IN IP4 <ipv4> >> s=SIP Call >> c=IN IP4 <ipv4> >> t=0 0 >> m=audio 16384 RTP/AVP 8 0 >> c=IN IP4 <ipv4> >> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 >> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 >> >> --uniqueBoundary >> Content-Type: application/x-q931 >> Content-Disposition: signal;handling=optional >> Content-Length: 62 >> 4" l15004p15001}~Bu%C1b..,h d.brA9W >> --uniqueBoundary >> Content-Type: application/gtd >> Content-Disposition: signal;handling=optional >> >> IAM, >> PRN,isdn*,,, >> USI,rate,c,s,c,1 >> USI,lay1,ulaw >> TMR,00 >> CPN,08,,1,5001 >> CGN,08,,1,,,5004 >> UUS,3,1d427525924331629400002c6820640062f21041b9d7bd >> CPC,09 >> FCI,,,,,,,y, >> GCI,185ef1291b9911e381d500270dff3fa0 >> >> --uniqueBoundary-- >> >> (3) config excerpt >> ============if (has_body("multipart/mixed")) { >> if (filter_body("application/sdp")) { >> remove_hf("Mime-Version"); >> remove_hf("Content-Type"); >> append_hf("Content-Type: application/sdp\r\n"); >> } else { >> xlog("L_WARN", " <route> message body part 'application/sdp' not >> found\n"); >> } >> $var(UUS)=$(rb{re.subst,/^(.*)UUS,.,([a-z0-9,]*)..[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z],(.*)/\2/s}); >> append_hf("User-to-User: $var(UUS)\r\n", "CSeq"); >> >> if >> !(subst_body('/Content-Disposition..session.handling=required....//s')) >> { >> xlog("L_WARN", " <route> substituting Content-Disposition >> FAILED!!! \n"); >> } >> msg_apply_changes(); >> if (search_body("a=[a-z]+:.+[\r\n]{4}$")) { >> #!ifdef WITH_XLOGDEBUG >> xlog("L_INFO", " <route> double CRLF at the end of the message >> body detected - is reduced to one now. \n"); #!endif >> $var(sdp) = $(rb{s.striptail,2}); >> set_body("$var(sdp)", "application/sdp"); >> } >> } >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users at lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com > http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio Advanced Trainings - Berlin, Oct 21-24; Miami, Nov 11-13, 2013 > - more details about Kamailio trainings at http://www.asipto.com -

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com, "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, I tried $rz option on top of request route and that where I see wrong request uri like sip:sips: . And as far I can see it happenes only for SUBSCRIBE INVITE and NOTIFY. if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } Slava. Sent from mobile device typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_BEGIN Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match but I changed to subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); and log says that it match, but still ask for sips and then crash Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=507 a=25 n=subst Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (229, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (299, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (364, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (538, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 266 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 336 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 401 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 575 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kernel: [87678.490671] kamailio[4774]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd27c sp 00007fff9a126ea0 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b9000] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:711]: subst_f(): lst was 0x7fd875e0dd98 That why I asked about this bug report, it close because of limitation in openser/kamailio. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:57:29 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, that's from 2007, closed as invalid -- that was v1.2. Again, as in my previous email, you haven't described what is the state after using the subst as I suggested previously. Cheers, Daniel On 25/02/15 15:47, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

allow_trusted and ipv6 addresses
by Sergey Okhapkin 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

allow_trusted() function of permissions module doesn't work right with ipv6 addresses - it treats IP addresses as strings and doesn't take into account variations aaa:bbb::0 vs aaa:bbb:0:0:0:0:0:0.

4 9

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match but I changed to subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); and log says that it match, but still ask for sips and then crash Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=507 a=25 n=subst Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (229, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (299, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (364, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (538, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 266 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 336 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 401 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 575 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kernel: [87678.490671] kamailio[4774]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd27c sp 00007fff9a126ea0 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b9000] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:711]: subst_f(): lst was 0x7fd875e0dd98 That why I asked about this bug report, it close because of limitation in openser/kamailio. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:57:29 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, that's from 2007, closed as invalid -- that was v1.2. Again, as in my previous email, you haven't described what is the state after using the subst as I suggested previously. Cheers, Daniel On 25/02/15 15:47, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

3 2

Hide Redirection from UAC
by ron.kamailio＠mcleodnet.com 27 Feb '15

27 Feb '15

I have an instance of Kamailio configured as an outbound proxy and I want to be able to hide the fact the a 3XX redirection result may have been encountered while attempting to route the call. I am using the fragment below and it does appear to work, but I am wondering if there is a better way. failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] { if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } if (t_check_status("3[0-9][0-9]")) { append_branch($(T_rpl($ct){nameaddr.uri})); route(RELAY); exit; } } Thanks.

2 3

source websocket ip address
by jaflong jaflong 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

On a request received over websocket how can the ip address of the http server that jssip library connected through and send the call from be know?

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

Hello Daniel, Thank you for all help and last solution getting closer, client register, but I see in log Feb 25 13:13:00 canlvprx01 kamailio: 3(5051) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [52]; uri=[sip:sips:10101@public_ip:5066] Feb 25 13:13:00 canlvprx01 kamailio: 3(5051) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body [<sip:sips:10101@public_ip:5066> <--- SIP read from UDP:10.18.130.46:5060 ---> SIP/2.0 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/TM) Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.18.130.50:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1bddbf73;rport=5060;received=10.18.130.50 From: "capbxsrv01" <sip:capbxsrv01@10.18.130.50>;tag=as7c3f6955 To: <sip:sips:10101@public_ip:5063>;tag=6eb8dc78f5 Call-ID: 08a2c6f10b91e480 CSeq: 102 NOTIFY Server: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux)) Content-Length: 0 I think need updated $ru for SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY. Please let me know what additional information required for backtrace. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 12:04:28 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, substr you suggested didn't worked. See my previous email. your previous email didn't say anything about the results. That's why I asked. Be sure you don't have those spaces that are in the email you wrote. Also, I had more parenthesis in the parameter of the subst_uri(). Or you can try the alternative with: if($rz=="sips") { $ru = "sip" + $(ru{s.substr,4,0}); } I asked for more details from the backtrace to confirm that what I found is the cause for the crash in this case -- see one of my previous emails from today. Cheers, Daniel BQ_BEGIN Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match but I changed to subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); and log says that it match, but still ask for sips and then crash Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=507 a=25 n=subst Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (229, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (299, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (364, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=0 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:469]: subst_run(): subst_run: matched (538, 5): [sips:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 266 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 336 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 401 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:695]: subst_f(): textops: replacing at offset 575 [sips:] with [sip:] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kernel: [87678.490671] kamailio[4774]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd27c sp 00007fff9a126ea0 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b9000] Feb 25 11:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops [textops.c:711]: subst_f(): lst was 0x7fd875e0dd98 That why I asked about this bug report, it close because of limitation in openser/kamailio. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:57:29 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, that's from 2007, closed as invalid -- that was v1.2. Again, as in my previous email, you haven't described what is the state after using the subst as I suggested previously. Cheers, Daniel On 25/02/15 15:47, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); subst("/sips:/ sip:/g "); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

3 2

usrloc table to redis
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

Hello. We try to use redis for maximum features of kamailio. We already realise dispatcher (not as module, but I want to do it at the future), and now we want to relocate usrloc to redis. Does anyone do this with Redis?

2 1

RTPEngine IPv4 to IPv6 bridging returning c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 on answer?
by Anthony Messina 26 Feb '15

26 Feb '15

This is probably very likely a configuration issue on my part, but I wanted to check before reporting an RTPEngine bug... Thank you for any pointers or suggestions. This is a multi-homed server where em1: INTERNAL_IPv4 & GLOBAL_IPv6 em2: EXTERNAL_IPv4 Note that below, the IPv6 address on my server is the same on priv and pub and is reachable from "internal" and "external" endpoints. I have it set this way as I eventually want to use ICE and have it create the proper IPv4/IPv6 candidates regardless of the RTPEngine --interface. I'm running RTPEngine with the following: /usr/sbin/rtpengine --table=0 --interface=pub/EXTERNAL_IPv4 --interface=pub/GLOBAL_IPv6 --interface=priv/INTERNAL_IPv4 --interface=priv/GLOBAL_IPv6 --listen-ng=127.0.0.1:12221 --tos=184 --log-level=7 --pidfile=/run/rtpengine/rtpengine.test.pid I'm trying to bridge an IPv4-initated call to an IPv6 carrier. The call seems to flow properly until the carrier's SDP is passed through RTPEngine on answer. The snippets are here, and I have attached the full log. [TdBe4MJa1DC4teIllJkqq6U-PAw9Zh4y] Received command 'answer' from 127.0.0.1:38786 [TdBe4MJa1DC4teIllJkqq6U-PAw9Zh4y] Dump for 'answer' from 127.0.0.1:38786: { "sdp": "v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1424799070 1424799071 IN IP6 CARRIER_IPv6 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP6 CARRIER_IPv6 t=0 0 m=audio 24308 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=silenceSupp:off - - - - a=ptime:20 a=rtcp:24309 IN IP6 CARRIER_IPv6 The CARRIER_IPv6 gets converted as follows with 0.0.0.0 in place of what should be the address of my RTPEngine instance. Shouldn't it be returning the IPv4 address of my RTPEngine instance (either priv or pub as called from Kamailio)? [TdBe4MJa1DC4teIllJkqq6U-PAw9Zh4y] Replying to 'answer' from 127.0.0.1:38786 [TdBe4MJa1DC4teIllJkqq6U-PAw9Zh4y] Response dump for 'answer' to 127.0.0.1:38786: { "sdp": "v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1424799070 1424799071 IN IP4 0.0.0.0 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 0.0.0.0 t=0 0 m=audio 38914 RTP/SAVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=silenceSupp:off - - - - a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:38915 a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:Jby5IPt4WlNySLd66eK+Mcky8yJeUwp7dWH7W3aO -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

3 4

db_mysql module compile error
by jaflong jaflong 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

On compiling I get this error km_dbase.c:38:25: fatal error: mysql/mysql.h: No such file or directory #include <mysql/mysql.h> ^ I have installed mysql using the standard install from tar.gz binary This places the prefix for install in /usr/local/mysql the include dir is /usr/local/mysql/include result of running mysql_config --include is -I/usr/local/mysql/include #ls /usr/local/mysql/include big_endian.h little_endian.h my_config.h my_pthread.h mysql.h plugin.h typelib.h byte_order_generic.h m_ctype.h my_dbug.h mysql mysql_time.h plugin_validate_password.h byte_order_generic_x86_64.h m_string.h my_dir.h mysql_com.h mysql_version.h sql_common.h byte_order_generic_x86.h my_alloc.h my_getopt.h mysql_com_server.h my_sys.h sql_state.h decimal.h my_attribute.h my_global.h mysqld_ername.h my_xml.h sslopt-case.h errmsg.h my_byteorder.h my_list.h mysqld_error.h plugin_audit.h sslopt-longopts.h keycache.h my_compiler.h my_net.h mysql_embed.h plugin_ftparser.h sslopt-vars.h as listed the header files a here I notice mysql.h in in /usr/local/mysql/include and not in the sub directory (/usr/local/mysql/include/mysql) Any suggestion on how to get this compiled

2 2

Kamailio Security Policy - How to handle vulnerability reports
by Olle E. Johansson 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Kamailians! During our last developer meeting, we had a discussion about implementing a security policy for the project. I drafted a proposal that seemed fine with the developer team. At this point, I'm looking for your feedback. The proposal is short and brief at this point, we'll learn as we go. Much of it is inspired by the policy of the Asterisk project. You can find it here: http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/securitypolicy We encourage your feedback! - Is this a good thing for the project? - Do you have any changes to the policy to suggest? At this point, we're not looking for support systems for this, or any software platform - we're focusing on getting the policy right, then we're going to look on how to implement it. Looking forward to your responses! Best regards, /Olle

3 5

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/sip:\1/'); subst("/sips:/sip:/g"); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=506 a=25 n=subst_uri Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:448]: subst_run(): subst_run: running. r=1 Feb 25 09:12:33 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4104) DEBUG: <core> [re.c:517]: subst_str(): subst_str: no match I tried something like if (proto==TLS) { #subst_uri('/^sips.+)$/sip:\1/'); subst("/sips:/sip:/g"); } but there some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove too. Slava From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips:(.+)$/ sip:\1/ '); Cheers, Daniel! On 25/02/15 01:14, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca> , "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> , "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca> ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> , "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> ] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org> ] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca> (24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org> , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org> (24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org> (24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50> :5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46> , using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca>, "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca>;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>, "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org>] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46>] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org>] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca>(24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org>, 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org>(24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org>(24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org>(24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50>:5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46>, using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, I wonder in my case why kamailio is not bridging between TLS and UDP ? Is there additional configuration required ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca> To: miconda(a)gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "volga629" <volga629(a)skillsearch.ca>, "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk You don't need to run kamailio through gdb. If it crashes, then you get a corefile -- in the logs it says the name of the file. It is usually located in / or in the path you gave to -w parameter. After you reproduced the crash, locate the corefile and run gdb like: gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile bt full The /path/to/kamailio should be /usr/sbin/kamailio if you installed from rpms. If you have improvements to init or sysconfig kamailio file, send a patch and we will include the changes in kamailio repository. Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/15 01:00, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > I upgraded to 4.2.3 version, but crash still there. What is my options to meet case like this. > > Client TLS -------> KAMAILIO Proxy ------ UDP/TCP ----> asterisk > | > | > Public Private > > I will try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky <volga629(a)networklab.ca>;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, > by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. > > The crash is reported in another process that doesn't print much logs > messages. As Olle suggested, can you get the backtrace with gdb from the > core file? That will help to see where the crash happened. > > gdb /path/to/kamailio /path/to/corefile > bt full > > And again, it would be good to upgrade to 4.2.3 -- it is same config and > database, just install new version and restart. In this way we rule out > issues that were fixed already, avoiding to spend time on something fixed. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > On 20/02/15 15:03, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> Hello Everyone, >> Thank you for reply, >> On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio >> Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured >> to 5061 >> >> http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ >> >> Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed >> >> http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ >> >> Here config file >> >> http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ >> >> >> Thank you, >> Slava. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> >> *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>, "sr-users" >> <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >> *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk >> >> We also need to check the core file from the crash. >> /O >> On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your >> config to me? >> >> As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the >> next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: >> >> xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); >> >> I will like to double check if the issue is still present. >> >> You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you >> have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. >> >> If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for >> forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain... >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: >> >> Hello Everyone, >> I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for >> asterisk servers. >> Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on >> private side UDP 5060. >> When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything >> goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio >> tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp >> then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of >> kamailio. >> >> Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss >> configuration ? >> >> >> [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail >> kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: >> <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> >> >> >> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org>] == [10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46>] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org >> <http://domain.org>] == [67.34.12.56] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - >> checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: [4130713.518667] >> kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp >> 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** >> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] >> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , >> global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start >> searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction >> matching failed >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: >> no transaction found >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: >> trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault >> at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in >> kamailio[400000+3b8000] >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: >> 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca >> <http://tcp.networklab.ca>(24), 33), h=646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS >> (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs >> (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): >> dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org >> <http://tcp.domain.org>, 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding _sips._tcp.domain.org <http://tcp.domain.org>(24) 33 >> (flags=0) at 646 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: >> adding camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org>(24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): >> dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org >> <http://camsgsrv02.domain.org>(24), 1), h=967 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id >> added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp >> connection found, opening new one >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: >> 10.18.130.50 <callto:10.18.130.50> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, >> type 3 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 >> <callto:10.18.130.50>:5061: could not find corresponding >> listening socket for 10.18.130.46 <callto:10.18.130.46>, using >> default... >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain >> TLSc<default> >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls >> [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake >> started >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new >> connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read >> response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> >> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, >> 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 >> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm >> [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed >> >> >> >> Thank you Slava. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 >> Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

TLS t_replicate
by Kelvin Chua 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

serverA listens on both UDP and TLS serverB listens on UDP only client registers to serverA via UDP. serverA uses t_replicate (;transport=udp) sends register to serverB all looks good client registers to serverA via TLS serverA uses t_replicate (;transport=udp) but no packet comes out of kamailio :( how is it supposed to be done? any ideas? Kelvin Chua

1 1

2 TLS issues/questions: per-client config & IPv6 client
by Anthony Messina 25 Feb '15

25 Feb '15

I'm wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction for the following two issues with Kamailio and tls.cfg 1. When attempting to configure TLS settings for connecting to a specific IPv4 client, it seems that the ca_list indicated in [client:default] overrides the one in the client-specific config. If I don't include the client's CA in the [client:default] section, I get the following, regardless of what is in [client:204.74.213.5:5061]. ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1230]: tls_read_f(): TLS write:error:14090086:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_SERVER_CERTIFICATE:certificate verify failed [client:default] method = TLSv1+ verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = no private_key = /etc/kamailio/key.pem certificate = /etc/kamailio/crt.pem verify_depth = 2 # In order for the client below to work, the ca_list here needs to support # contain the CA for the specific client. Not sure why, maybe a bug? #ca_list = /etc/pki/CA/myownCA.pem # Can't use this one ca_list = /etc/kamailio/kamailio.tls.ca_list.pem # Contains ALL client CA's [client:204.74.213.5:5061] method = TLSv1+ verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes verify_depth = 2 ca_list = /etc/kamailio/204.74.213.5.crt.pem 2. When attempting to configure TLS settings for connecting to a specific IPv6 client, I cannot figure out the syntax needed to specify the IPv6 client. What is the proper syntax? With [client:[2607:5300:60:1f93::0]:5061], I get: ERROR: tls [tls_config.c:71]: parse_ipv6(): tls.cfg:57:9: Invalid IPv6 address Any guidance is appreciated. Thanks. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

2 9

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 117, Issue 23
by Euan Thoms 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 04:25:14 +0100 > From: Markus <universe(a)truemetal.org> > To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" > <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] NAT SIPPING in a FreeBSD jail > Message-ID: <54E94C1A.6000704(a)truemetal.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > Am 21.02.2015 um 08:47 schrieb Euan Thoms: > > ** My question is: how do I force the ping behaviour in NAT SIPping feature? I need a trigger to further debug. > > Just an idea in general: Attach to the kamailio process(es) with strace > with trace output to a file and the moment it crashes you should have > some more data. I think I found the problem. I think it was nothing to do with NAT SIPping. I had to patch ip_addr.h because Clang on FreeBSD was not finding the INADDR_LOCALHOST definition from netinet/in.h, despite it being there in FreeBSDs' /usr/include. So previously I defined it as an 'unsigned long'. Now that I have defined it in ip_addr.h as a 'u_int32_t' Kamailio has not crashed since. Also, I no longer get any errors in my /var/log/messages when Linphone closes. I have yet to re-enable WITH_NATSIPPING, I want to wait a bit longer before drawing any further conclussions. Thanks and regards to all the Kamailio devs, Euan Thoms.

1 0

Textops Module - Multipart Body conversion
by Federico San Martín 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi guys, I'm trying to convert an SDP body to Multipart/Mixed and add an ISUP encapsulated part (SIP-I) on a 200OK reply. It seems like the module is having trouble with the delimiters. The scenario is like this: PSTN MGC Kamailio SEMS |-------IAM------>| | | | |----INVITE/IAM/SDP---> | | | | | ---INVITE/IAM/SDP--> | | | | <------200OK/SDP---- | | |<-----200OK/ACM/SDP--- | | |<------ACM-------| | | This is the config I'm using (just showing the relevant part, let me know if you need the whole config file): onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY]{ if (status=~"200"){ xlog("L_INFO","Reply <$rs> Message Interception\n"); route(INSERT_ACM); } } route[INSERT_ACM]{ set_body_multipart(); $var(acm) = "06 02 04 01 29 01 01 00"; append_body_part("$var(acm)","application/isup; version=itu-t92+","signal; handling=optional"); return; } The original 200OK Message received is: #U 2015/02/20 11:40:38.687418 172.30.24.20:5080 -> 172.30.24.20:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.24.20;branch=z9hG4bK8a2b.41161a372680192aa4fdd9efbefd6696.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.8.66:5060;branch=z9hG4bK+1010ce54853b2a3c7f7b8a220b4b69a41+3a836f1f+1 Call-ID: 4C6CD8F8@3a836f1f From: "Fede SM Test"<sip:1135349910@172.30.8.66:5060;user=phone>;tag=3a836f1f+1+1e100002+ef7ba2f0 To: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5060;user=phone>;tag=3DF4D6A2-54E74766000A65EC-41B8C700 CSeq: 221937633 INVITE Server: Sip Express Media Server (1.5.1 (x86_64/linux)) Contact: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5080> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 224 v=0 o=sems 351367313 715465045 IN IP4 172.30.24.20 s=sems c=IN IP4 172.30.24.20 t=0 0 m=audio 10054 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=direction:both And the mangled 200OK message I generate with Kamailio to send Upstream with this configuration is: # U 2015/02/20 11:40:38.690733 172.30.24.20:5060 -> 172.30.8.66:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.8.66:5060;branch=z9hG4bK+1010ce54853b2a3c7f7b8a220b4b69a41+3a836f1f+1 Call-ID: 4C6CD8F8@3a836f1f From: "Fede SM Test"<sip:1135349910@172.30.8.66:5060;user=phone>;tag=3a836f1f+1+1e100002+ef7ba2f0 To: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5060;user=phone>;tag=3DF4D6A2-54E74766000A65EC-41B8C700 CSeq: 221937633 INVITE Server: Sip Express Media Server (1.5.1 (x86_64/linux)) Contact: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5080> Content-Length: 301 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="unique-boundary-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 --unique-boundary-1 Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=sems 351367313 715465045 IN IP4 172.30.24.20 s=sems c=IN IP4 172.30.24.20 t=0 0 m=audio 10054 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=direction:both --unique-boundary-1 As you can see, the TEXTOPS module is not adding the ISUP part, also the boundary of the SDP is missing the last "--" to indicate this is the last part. But it is indeed changing the Content-Type to multipart/mixed, although the boundary has a set of quotes that I'm not sure if could be the problem. On the logs I get: Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: INFO: Kamlog: Reply <200> Message Interception Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1582]: set_multibody_helper(): delimiter<17>:[unique-boundary-1] Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=225 Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1491]: generate_boundary(): adding final CRLF+CRLF Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1719]: set_multibody_helper(): content-type<44>:[multipart/mixed;boundary="unique-boundary-1"] Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: textops [textops.c:1771]: set_multibody_helper(): set flag FL_BODY_MULTIPART ### Error ### Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: ERROR: textops [textops.c:1869]: append_multibody_helper(): Cannot get boundary. Is body multipart? ### ### Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=200 Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:470]: clen_builder(): clen_builder: content-length: 302 (302) Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2278]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): old size: 804, new size: 844 Feb 20 11:51:49 KAMAILIO kamailio[19883]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2296]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): copied size: orig:804, new: 844, rest: 0 msg=#012SIP/2.0 200 OK#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.30.8.66:5060;branch=z9hG4bK+68a818f192518f00b46eeddb5c81dd791+3a836f1f+1#015#012Call-ID: CE965967@3a836f1f#015#012From: "Fede SM Test"<sip:1135349910@172.30.8.66:5060;user=phone>;tag=3a836f1f+1+1e090003+66eb0deb#015#012To: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5060;user=phone>;tag=21E58627-54E74A050009BACD-41C8D700#015#012CSeq: 525107355 INVITE#015#012Server: Sip Express Media Server (1.5.1 (x86_64/linux))#015#012Contact: <sip:100@172.30.24.20:5080>#015#012Content-Length: 302#015#012Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="unique-boundary-1"#015#012Mime-Version: 1.0#015#012#015#012--unique-boundary-1#015#012Content-Type: application/sdp#015#012#015#012v=0#015#012o=sems 1379293612 709544991 IN IP4 172.30.24.20#015#012s=sems#015#012c=IN IP4 172.30.24.20#015#012t=0 0#015#012m=audio 10056 RTP/AVP 8 101#015#012a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000#015#012a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000#015#012a=fmtp:101 0-15#015#012a=sendrecv#015#012a=direction:both#015#012#015#012--unique-boundary-1#015#012 Could it be that those missing "--" after the unique-boundary-1 delimiter are the ones giving trouble? Or could it be those extra quotes on the Content-Type boundary? Any help would be appreciated, thanks!! Federico Federico San Martín e-mail : fsanmartin(a)telecentro.net.ar

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] Regarding RTP in IMS Networks.
by Badri Ranganathan 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi all, I'll make this question a little clearer. User 1 ---------------- SBC ----+ other IMS network components ---------------------- User 2 Same scenario User 1 Making the call + plays RTP Traffic User 2 Answering the call + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis If user 2, after answering the call, did not play RTP as well, the SBC will not forward the RTP from User 1 to User 2. [The media gateways responsible for the RTP traffic is also a part of the IMS network right?] So why this sort of bi-directional traffic imposition in an IMS Network ? Thanks, Badri. -----Original Message----- From: Badri Ranganathan Sent: 24 February 2015 15:13 To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: Regarding RTP in IMS Networks. Hi all, I have a doubt w.r.t media traffic in IMS Networks. If I have a setting as follows - User 1 Making the call + plays RTP Traffic User 2 Answering the call + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis I see that User 2 has to play RTP Traffic before it can start recording the RTP coming from user 1. i.e., User 2 Answering the call + (Play RTP Traffic ) + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis. Why am I seeing this behaviour. Is it just a setting in the IMS network that can be changed or is it a standard behaviour in IMS Networks ? If yes, then could anyone please let me know the logic behind such a decision? Please do let me know if you have any ideas. Any responses really appreciated ! Thanks, Badri.

2 1

Regarding RTP in IMS Networks.
by Badri Ranganathan 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi all, I have a doubt w.r.t media traffic in IMS Networks. If I have a setting as follows - User 1 Making the call + plays RTP Traffic User 2 Answering the call + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis I see that User 2 has to play RTP Traffic before it can start recording the RTP coming from user 1. i.e., User 2 Answering the call + (Play RTP Traffic ) + records the RTP Traffic coming from User 1 and does a PESQ voice quality analysis. Why am I seeing this behaviour. Is it just a setting in the IMS network that can be changed or is it a standard behaviour in IMS Networks ? If yes, then could anyone please let me know the logic behind such a decision? Please do let me know if you have any ideas. Any responses really appreciated ! Thanks, Badri.

1 0

Drouting Question
by Andrew Okri 24 Feb '15

24 Feb '15

Hi All, Does dropping set the $du or $ru uri when it finds a match in the database? I am getting destination not set error in my debug trace and he call request times out as a result. Regards Andrew Okri

1 0

kamailio crash
by kovarik＠odorik.cz 23 Feb '15

23 Feb '15

Hello, kamailio crash if receive this invite (full pcap in attach): INVITE sip:+420235356120@sip.odorik.cz SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 89.103.14.100:5060;branch=z9hG4bKader9m419p44oh1arfvg3q3;rport From: <sip:680114@sip.odorik.cz>;tag=n67dnvutedhc7h8g0723 To: <sip:+420235356120@sip.odorik.cz> Contact: <sip:4WJEcOsCK95r_THu1yoG@89.103.14.100:5060;comp=sigcomp> Supported: 100rel,timer CSeq: 2374 INVITE Call-ID: PKnr_QhkoIfgFw74ch7P9QzSx4Utqm Allow: UPDATE,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,REFER,NOTIFY,INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,OPTIONS,BYE User-Agent: Nokia RM-469 091.003 (cs) Expires: 120 Privacy: None Session-Expires: 1800 Max-Forwards: 69 Proxy-Authorization: Digest realm="sip.odorik.cz",nonce="VOd181TndMfi5yGjm4maxIr8yb1s/ARs",algorithm=MD5,username="680114",uri="sip:+420235356120@sip.odorik.cz",response="11aa17ebbf02d284c1fa5b03bca7fd89" Content-Type: application/sdp Accept-Language: cs Content-Length: 540 v=0 o=680114 63592714297343250 63592714297343250 IN IP4 89.103.14.100 s=- c=IN IP4 89.103.14.100 t=0 0 m=audio 49152 RTP/AVP 100 96 0 8 97 18 98 13 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:100 AMR-WB/16000 a=ptime:20 a=maxptime:200 a=fmtp:100 mode-change-period=2; mode-change-neighbor=1 a=rtpmap:96 AMR/8000 a=fmtp:96 mode-set=0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7; mode-change-neighbor=1 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:97 iLBC/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:98 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:98 0-15 a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000 and in run im kamailio.cfg $var(codecs)="G729,PCMA,GSM,iLBC,speex,telephone-event"; sdp_keep_codecs_by_name($var(codecs)); Kamailio crash with gdb export crash_20.02.2015 in attachments. kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 9524b3-dirty flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, DBG_F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 9524b3 -dirty compiled on 23:32:12 Feb 19 2015 with gcc 4.7.2 Thank you.

2 2

Best practices for unsetting PVs
by Alex Balashov 23 Feb '15

23 Feb '15

Hi, We have this approach for arrayable PVs (e.g. AVPs, XAVPs): $(avp(var)[*]) = $null; This defines the PV, but sets its value to null. I haven't tested, but I would assume, in the case of an AVP, that this would cause it to fail defined $avp(var) is_avp_set("$avp(var)") But, I see there is also in the 'pv' module now a function pv_unset(), i.e. pv_unset("$avp(var)"); pv_unset("$var(foo)"); I assume this actually deletes the variable itself from the namespace, instead of assigning it an undefined value. Are there pros and cons to using one or the other to mass-reset variables relevant to call processing at the beginning of route script? Thanks, -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 235 E Ponce de Leon Ave Suite 106 Decatur, GA 30030 United States Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 23 Feb '15

23 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, Thank you for reply, On client I configured user @ domain.org and proxy point to kamailio Here 1 debug where on client after doamin.org port is left configured to 5061 http://fpaste.org/188145/44047614/ Second debug where port set to 0 and kamailio tries resolve and crashed http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ Here config file http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ Thank you, Slava. From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> To: "Daniel Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk We also need to check the core file from the crash. /O On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com > wrote: Hello, can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your config to me? As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); I will like to double check if the issue is still present. You should upgrade to 4.2.3, because it is the latest stable, you have 4.2.1 and there were many fixes meanwhile. If you preserve sips as uri schema, then you force tls further for forwarding. You should change that to sip:domain ... Cheers, Daniel On 18/02/15 00:37, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for asterisk servers. Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on private side UDP 5060. When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of kamailio. Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss configuration ? [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==12 && [ domain.org ] == [ 10.18.130.46 ] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==11 && [ domain.org ] == [67.34.12.56] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx 01 kernel: [4130713.518667] kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 0000000 0004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx 01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007 fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] Feb 17 11:13: 49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5St ringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): dns_hash_find(_sips._ tcp.networklab.ca (24), 33), h=646 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._ tcp.domain.org , 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: adding _sips._ tcp.domain.org (24) 33 (flags=0) at 646 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: adding camsgsrv02.domain.org (24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): dns_hash_find( camsgsrv02.domain.org (24), 1), h=967 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 10.18.130.50 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, type 3 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 :5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 10.18.130.46 , using default... Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain TLSc<default> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake started Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed Thank you Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

3 3

Dispatcher: Check uri string in Kamailio 3.3
by Jon Bonilla (Manwe) 22 Feb '15

22 Feb '15

Hi all I need to check a given uri against dispatcher destination entries. I see that it's possible in kamailio 4.2 using ds_is_from_list which allows "uri" parameter but it's not available in version 3.3. Moving to 4.x is not an option this time. Any hints about how to check this? Raw sql + string comparation or something more elegant out there? thanks, Jon

2 1

NAT SIPPING in a FreeBSD jail
by Euan Thoms 22 Feb '15

22 Feb '15

I've been running Kamailio 4.2.2/4.2.3 in a FreeBSD 10.1 jail for a few weeks, thanks to a recent port in the FreeBSD ports tree. However, it has been a bit unstable. It crashes randomly. It's hard to debug since it can go three days without crashing, and there is no obvious trigger. I'm also running 4.1.0 on FreeBSD 8.3, compiled from source manually. It is rock solid for a long time now. So, I have 2 theories: 1) My FreeBSd ports patch for ip_addr.h is wrong. I was having to define INADDR_LOOPBACK since compile would fail with 'undeclared identifier'. My patch was to define INADDR_LOOPBACK in ip_addr.h as a 'long' as such: #define INADDR_LOOPBACK (long) 0x7F000001 However, it appears this should have been: #define INADDR_LOOPBACK (unsigned long) 0x7F000001 The previous patch seemed to work, but could have caused the crashes I'm seeing. 2.) The NAT SIPPing feature defined with WITH_NATSIPPING is a new feature since 4.1.0. So my 4.1.0 installation does not use it. Now that I am using it on 4.2.3, I am getting this random crash. I suspect that the feature uses an ICMP ping at some stage. In FreeBSD jails, by default ping is not allowed (security feature). If you really need to ping then you need to explicitly allow raw sockets. So perhaps Kamailio doesn't know how to handle the "operation not permitted" and crashes. I am going to test without NAT SIPping and see if it crashes. Although it's hard to test, since I have no trigger and it can be days between crashes. ** My question is: how do I force the ping behaviour in NAT SIPping feature? I need a trigger to further debug. Output from /var/log/messages after crash: Feb 19 05:39:56 sip /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[52610]: CRITICAL: <core> [pass_fd.c:293]: receive_fd(): EOF on 24 Feb 19 05:39:56 sip /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[52578]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:784]: handle_sigs(): child process 52606 exited by a signal 6 Feb 19 05:39:56 sip /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[52578]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:787]: handle_sigs(): core was generated

2 1

Re-invites from carrier breaks the call
by Will Ferrer 21 Feb '15

21 Feb '15

Hi All We have any issue with re invites coming from the carrier. When a reinvite occurs, our softphone client gets the invite, sends a 100, and then sends 200 ok. However the 200 ok does not have the softphones ip in the record route. Since it's not in the record route the ack from the carrier never makes it's way all the back to the softphone. This causes the softphone to keep sending 200 oks since it never gets the ack. Eventually the softphone gets tired of sending 200 oks and sends a bye. Is there any way that Kamailio can help me correct for this, or do we need to have our clients use different softphones? If it has to be handled via softphones is there even a softphone that can account for this? Thanks for all your assistance in advance. All the best. Will Ferrer Switchsoft

10 29

xhttp module and IPv6
by Sergey Okhapkin 20 Feb '15

20 Feb '15

It looks like when http request comes from ipv6 address, the module inserts Via header without [] around the address: Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2193]: parse_via(): ERROR:parse_via: bad port Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2708]: parse_via(): ERROR: parse_via on: <SIP/2.0/TCP 2601:3:8840:A:172E:9CAD:6BB2:3F69:45306 Host: sip1.callwithus.com:5060 Connection: Upgrade Pragma: no-cache Cache-Control: no-cache Upgrade: websocket Origin: http://www.callwithus.com Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.93 Safari/537.36 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, sdch Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8 Sec-WebSocket-Key: nyAUyArASVRXTI+Nvx82/Q== Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate; client_max_window_bits Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: sip > Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2712]: parse_via(): ERROR: parse_via parse error, parsed so far:<SIP/2.0/TCP 2601:3> Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:125]: get_hdr_field(): ERROR: get_hdr_field: bad via Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: INFO: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:338]: parse_headers(): ERROR: bad header field [Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 260] Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:688]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=<GET / HTTP/1.1 *Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 2601:3:8840:A:172E:9CAD:6BB2:3F69:45306* Host: sip1.callwithus.com:5060 Connection: Upgrade Pragma: no-cache Cache-Control: no-cache Upgrade: websocket Origin: http://www.callwithus.com Sec-WebSocket-Version: 13 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.93 Safari/537.36 Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, sdch Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.8 Sec-WebSocket-Key: nyAUyArASVRXTI+Nvx82/Q== Sec-WebSocket-Extensions: permessage-deflate; client_max_window_bits Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: sip > Feb 20 14:26:17 east /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[30965]: ERROR: xhttp [xhttp_mod.c:264]: xhttp_process_request(): parse_msg failed

2 4

CNXCC Max Call control on Version 4.1.4
by Jonathan Hunter 20 Feb '15

20 Feb '15

Hi Guys, Using kamailio Version 4.1.4 on Centos 6.5 I have an issue when using cnxcc to control max call duration for all outbound calls. In my configuration I set the following; # -----Dialog params -----modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", 4)modparam("cnxcc", "dlg_flag", 4)modparam("cnxcc", "credit_check_period", 1) Then I look to set some parameters for outbound calls; ###########Set Max Call Duration for MT Call ############# $var(customer) = "MTPublic";$var(max_time) = $var(MTMaxCallDuration);xlog("L_INFO","For setting Call Duration we have ProfileID=$var(profileIDMD) and we have var(max_time)=$var(max_time)\n");cnxcc_set_max_time("$var(customer)", "$var(max_time)");xlog("L_INFO","Max Call duration set to $var(max_time) seconds\n"); Feb 20 14:20:26 voip01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1950]: INFO: <script>: Max Call duration set to 600 secondsFeb 20 14:20:35 voip01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1960]: ALERT: cnxcc [cnxcc_check.c:157]: check_calls_by_time(): [74d7c02e-33ae-1233-edba-005056a48754] call has exhausted its time. Breaking the loopFeb 20 14:20:35 voip01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1960]: INFO: <script>: [74d7c02e-33ae-1233-edba-005056a48754]: call killed as Max Call Duration ExpiredFeb 20 14:20:35 voip01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1960]: ERROR: cnxcc [cnxcc_mod.c:1068]: terminate_call(): Error executing dlg_end_dlg command. Return code was [404] Now as you can see, as soon as the Called party answers, the cnxcc module drops the call stating that Max Call duration has expired, however it was set to 600 seconds. If I restart kamailio this clears the issue and it works fine allowing calls to run up to 600 seconds. Any help/comment on this would be great, is it just configuration related? Thanks Jon

2 6

Kamailio
by Tomasz Gass 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Good morning, I'm looking for someone who, according to my guidelines set kamailio and connect the asterisk. Kamailio to act as a proxy server to accept registrations sip and locate. Pay for the correct configuration. Please contact me with people interested. Regards Tom

2 1

kamailio asterisk
by Slava Bendersky 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Hello Everyone, I have standard case where kamailio play role of proxy for asterisk servers. Kamailio configured use TLS transport on public side and on private side UDP 5060. When client (SIP soft phone) connect to TLS socket everything goes well until kamailio trying forward request. Kamailio tries DNS resolve tls transport srv records instead of udp then it just crashed when no tls configured on private side of kamailio. Do I need manually fix sips in URI ? Or some different miss configuration ? [root@canlvprx01 kamailio]# rpm -qa | grep kamail kamailio-carrierroute-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-mysql-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-outbound-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 kamailio-tls-4.2.1-4.2.fc21.x86_64 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: parse_msg(): method: <REGISTER> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: parse_msg(): uri: <sips:domain.org> ---> Client come with TLS transport Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==12 && [domain.org] == [ 10.18.130.46 ] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:583]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 13==11 && [domain.org] == [67.34.12.56] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:587]: grep_sock_info(): grep_sock_info - checking if port 5081 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx 01 kernel: [4130713.518667] kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 0000000 0004bd30c sp 00007fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=850 a=25 n=append_hf Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[SIPOUT] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=851 a=5 n=route Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=563 a=25 n=is_method Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=567 a=25 n=is_method Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=574 a=16 n=if Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) ERROR: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio-asterisk.cfg] l=571 a=24 n=t_relay Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1373]: t_newtran(): DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=1 , global msg id=1 , T on entrance=(nil) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:527]: t_lookup_request(): t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=48550, isACK=0 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: matching_3261(): DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:709]: t_lookup_request(): DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:380]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): DBG: trans=0x7f598a9ced40, callback type 1, id 0 entered Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx 01 kernel: kamailio[22484]: segfault at 88 ip 00000000004bd30c sp 00007 fffa2f73a20 error 4 in kamailio[400000+3b8000] Feb 17 11:13: 49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [md5utils.c:67]: MD5St ringArray(): DEBUG: MD5 calculated: 0475e0d0dd9778e889618cb724403b4d Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): dns_hash_find(_sips._tcp.networklab.ca(24), 33), h=646 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [resolve.c:967]: get_record(): get_record: skipping 1 NS (p=0xa1f556, end=0xa1f588) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [resolve.c:983]: get_record(): get_record: parsing 2 ARs (p=0xa1f568, end=0xa1f588) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:1772]: dns_get_related(): dns_get_related(0x7f598a9e89b0 (_sips._tcp.domain.org, 33), 33, *0x7f5995bd55e0) (0) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: adding _sips._tcp.domain.org(24) 33 (flags=0) at 646 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:869]: dns_cache_add_unsafe(): dns_cache_add: adding camsgsrv02.domain.org(24) 1 (flags=0) at 967 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [dns_cache.c:566]: _dns_hash_find(): dns_hash_find(camsgsrv02.domain.org(24), 1), h=967 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:2871]: create_via_hf(): create_via_hf: id added: <;i=1>, rcv proto=3 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 10.18.130.50 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 5061, type 3 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 3263:0:0, 2 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) WARNING: <core> [tcp_main.c:1221]: tcp_do_connect(): 10.18.130.50 :5061: could not find corresponding listening socket for 10.18.130.46 , using default... Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain TLSc<default> Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake started Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2697]: tcpconn_1st_send(): pending write on new connection 0x7f598a9d4678 (-1/129 bytes written) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3565]: handle_ser_child(): handle_ser_child: read response= 7f598a9d4678, 5, fd 31 from 11 (22480) Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 15(22484) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9daf00, 31, 2, 0x7f598a9d4678), fd_no=19 Feb 17 11:13:49 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(22480) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:394]: t_relay_to(): SER: new transaction fwd'ed Thank you Slava.

3 2

acc db_extra problem
by Uri Shacked 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Hi, It is my second time upgrading kamailio to 4.2.X. Everything is working except the acc db_extra inserts. I keep on getting that error: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:123]: db_mysql_submit_query(): driver error on query: Incorrect integer value: '' for column XXXXXXX I must confess, I managed to solve the problem once. But I do not remember how :-(. The XXXXXX column is set as an integer with NULL enabled and no default value (which works on the kamailio server where i fixed it...) Any ideas of where it comes from? BR, Uri

2 2

Kamailio Debug
by keita Adoulaye 19 Feb '15

19 Feb '15

Hi friends, Having problems with this command: tail -f /var/log/kamailio.log That it’s what i got: ERROR: ctl [ctl.c:382]: mod_destroy(): ERROR: ctl: could not delete unix socket /tmp/kamailio_ctl: Operation not permitted (1) Any ideas will appreciated Thanks

3 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users