- sr-users - kamailio.org

R: [Users] failure_route
by D'Addelfio Davide 13 May '06

13 May '06

Thanks for reply. When I have a 404 Not Found, openser doesn't enter in failure root block and so it doesn't store anything into db. In attach my cfg file. Had a REFER message, why and what does it means? Thanks, Davide -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] Inviato: mercoledì 10 maggio 2006 23.56 A: D'Addelfio Davide Cc: users(a)openser.org Oggetto: Re: [Users] failure_route Hi, D'Addelfio Davide wrote: > Hi all, > > i have 2 questions for the forum: > > 1) What can I do to simulate a failure message to understand if > openser store it into database, through acc_db_request? > just send it back to your proxy with a username that does not exists in RURI -> 404 Not Found. > 2) Have I any chance to get information from reply messages, like > storing some in db or something else? I know I can't use acc and avp > module in on_reply route block, so any suggestion? > not from on_reply but from the failure_route you can. regards, bogdan

2 1

Re: [Users] SDP Invite message modification.
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 13 May '06

13 May '06

Hi Shane, these functions works over the message body (SDP in your case). the functions without the "_body" suffix works over the the headers. I guess you find all you need here: http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/textops.html regards, bogdan Shane Burrell wrote: >Does it also work with SIP headers? And the SDP section? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] >Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 4:43 AM >To: Shane Burrell >Cc: users(a)openser.org >Subject: Re: [Users] SDP Invite message modification. > >Hi Shane, > >you have the script functions (from textops) like >(search|replace|subst)_body > http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/textops.html > >regards, >bogdan > >Shane Burrell wrote: > > > >>I need to proxy and modify the Invite SDP. Can I do this from the cfg >>or do I need to look at a module like nathelper to modify the SDP? >>Below is an example >> >> >> >>Inbound to openser >> >>---Non-Working SDP--- >> >>v=0 >> >>o=nt01-1w-lax 1234 1146761158 IN IP4 152.92.17.27 s=sip call t=0 0 >>m=audio 38936 RTP/AVP 0 18 101 c=IN IP4 152.92.17.27 >> >>a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 >> >>a=fmtp:101 0-15 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>converted to - > >> >> >> >>Outbound to my gateway >> >>v=0 >> >>o=ast12345sg 1220177409 1220177409 IN IP4 152.92.17.27 >> >>s=- >> >>c=IN IP4 152.92.17.27 >> >>t=0 0 >> >>a=sendrecv >> >>m=audio 18006 RTP/AVP 0 18 18 >> >>a=fmtp:18 annexb=no >> >>a=fmtp:18 annexb=yes >> >> >> >>TIA, >> >> >> >>Shane >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Users mailing list >>Users(a)openser.org >>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >> > > >

1 0

[Users] Re: [Devel] IMPORTANT: Repository migration
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 13 May '06

13 May '06

right! my typing error :(. thanks and regards, bogdan Juha Heinanen wrote: >Bogdan-Andrei Iancu writes: > > > cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/openser co sip_server > > > > would be changed to > > > > cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@openser.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/openser co sip_server > >should be "co sip-server". > >-- juha > >

1 0

[Users] IMPORTANT: Repository migration
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 13 May '06

13 May '06

Hi everybody, as SF seams to have problems with CVS access, problems that cannot be reasonable (as time) solved, the board of the project decided to migrate the project repository from CVS to SVN (still being hosted on SF). Starting from now, all CVS access will be blocked as the migration process will start. The complete process may take couple of days (migration and SVN configuration), so please be patience - I will let you know as soon as public and developer access to SVN is available. thanks for understanding, Bogdan

1 1

[Serusers] Error : modparam("usrloc", "db_ur1"..
by Americania .it 12 May '06

12 May '06

I succeded in running ser with mysql , but when I enable the line with db_ur1 I receive the following error : FROM MY SER.CFG: modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) modparam("usrloc", "db_ur1", "mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") ------- this is rhe error : 0(10432) set_mod_param_regex: usrloc matches module usrloc 0(10432) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <db_ur1> not found in module <usrloc> 0(10432) parse error (59,20-21): Can't set module parameter

2 1

[Serusers] SER cannot connect to MySQL after upgrade
by Stephen Helfen 12 May '06

12 May '06

I just upgraded one of my proxies from SER (0.8.12) and MySQL (4.0.20-0) to SER (0.9.6-6) and MySQL (4.1.19-0). I have a custom module for ser that I have rebulit using the 0.9.6 source and can bring up ser, but cannot make any calls. I can register my UA with ser, but get immediate 404 not found fast busy when attempting to make a call. I am 99% sure that this is because my database access is not happening, but am not seeing any messages in /var/log/messages. Any suggestions??

2 3

[Serusers] serweb ctd problems
by Andrey Kouprianov 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hi, I got an "away" message back from serusers list, so Im re-sending this email again. Im trying to use CTD from serweb 0.9.4 (as well as directly by executing ctd.sh with arguments) and it always returns me 503 Service Unavailable (my SER distro is 0.9.6). /var/log/serweb only shows this May 12 22:02:26 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_aliases3. Useing default. May 12 22:02:26 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_acl4. Useing default. May 12 22:02:30 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_aliases3. Useing default. May 12 22:02:30 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_acl4. Useing default. May 12 22:04:00 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_aliases3. Useing default. May 12 22:04:00 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_acl4. Useing default. ( What does that mean, by the way?? ) /var/log/messages would display an error like the following May 12 22:04:26 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284bdc18,528,0,0x284bd210,16): Host is down(64) May 12 22:04:26 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 12 22:04:26 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) May 12 22:08:18 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284bdc18,530,0,0x284bd210,16): Host is down(64) May 12 22:08:18 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 12 22:08:18 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) May 12 22:10:27 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) May 12 22:11:16 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284bdc18,485,0,0x284bd210,16): Host is down(64) May 12 22:11:16 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 12 22:11:16 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) May 12 22:12:03 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284bdc18,485,0,0x284bd210,16): Host is down(64) May 12 22:12:03 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 12 22:12:03 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) and ngrep does not catch any INVITEs or REFERs. Im using eyeBeam to test this functionality. Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong?? Thanx in advance, Andrey.

1 0

[Serusers] serweb ctd
by Andrey Kouprianov 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hi, Im trying to use CTD from serweb 0.9.4 (as well as directly by executing ctd.sh with arguments) and it always returns me 503 Service Unavailable (my SER distro is 0.9.6). /var/log/serweb only shows this May 12 22:02:26 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_aliases3. Useing default. May 12 22:02:26 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_acl4. Useing default. May 12 22:02:30 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_aliases3. Useing default. May 12 22:02:30 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_acl4. Useing default. May 12 22:04:00 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_aliases3. Useing default. May 12 22:04:00 serweb [debug] Html form was not assigned to APU apu_acl4. Useing default. ( What does that mean, by the way?? ) /var/log/messages would display an error like the following May 12 22:04:26 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284bdc18,528,0,0x284bd210,16): Host is down(64) May 12 22:04:26 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 12 22:04:26 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) May 12 22:08:18 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284bdc18,530,0,0x284bd210,16): Host is down(64) May 12 22:08:18 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 12 22:08:18 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) May 12 22:10:27 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) May 12 22:11:16 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284bdc18,485,0,0x284bd210,16): Host is down(64) May 12 22:11:16 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 12 22:11:16 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) May 12 22:12:03 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x284bdc18,485,0,0x284bd210,16): Host is down(64) May 12 22:12:03 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed May 12 22:12:03 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[18155]: Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0, 256) and ngrep does not catch any INVITEs or REFERs. Im using eyeBeam to test this functionality. Does anyone have an idea what could be wrong?? Thanx in advance, Andrey.

1 0

RE: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hi, No actually they don't come to SER. I've already checked with ngrep. I also check them with Ethereal on the client side. They are directly sent to the destination where RTP is established. This is how Eyebeam acts. (I use Counterpath's Eyebeam softphone and they said that they are forwarding the BYE message to RTP sender and I should change route path on my SIP proxy) How can I do that ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Michal Matyska [mailto:michal.matyska@iptel.org] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 5:13 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net); serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages Hi, Yes I know and still I think your BYE messages went through SER, but you expect them at wrong place of the script. Run "ngrep -d any -p port 5060 -W byline" or "tethereal -i any -p port 5060" and you'll find them out. What I wanted to say is, that they come to SER and due to the predefined route set, they leave SER at the point route(1) is callend within the loose_route check. I expect you have the route[1] look like this: { if !t_relay() { sl_reply_error(); } } Well you can e.g. add if (method==BYE) { # handle the bye message .... # e.g. xlog("L_ERR","My message: %mb\n"); } between append_hf() and route(1) in your script Michal On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 04:25:04PM +0300, İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. > But I didn't understand what to do. I already have that configuration in the ser.cfg. > What should I add to it so that BYE messages would allways go through SER ? > > Thanks, > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] > On Behalf Of Michal Matyska > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:32 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE > messages > > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:38:51AM +0300, İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am still trying to find a solution to my problem with BYe messages that are not going through SER. > > Maybe someone with enough knowledge about route recording could help me with the configuration: > > > > My main problem with BYE messages is that they are not going through SER; the client sends it directly to my rtp proxy. as the RTP is established with it. > > I need them to go through SER. How can I achieve this ? > > > > I don't know how to use route recording, could you explain what > > following config block does ? (this is in the default configuration > > but doesn't make BYE messages to go through SER) > > > > It does (you can check by ethereal, ngrep etc.), > > > if (!method=="REGISTER") { > > record_route(); > > } > > but as it has another Route header pointing to the RTP proxy it leaves SER within the next block which is entered when loose_route() function has found any reasonable target in the Route headers to forward the request to .... > > > if (loose_route()) { > > # mark routing logic in request > > append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); > > so you can add your logic either here or into route[1] block, which > might be called from other places as well (be aware) > > > route(1); > > break; > > }; > > > > And you'll get all the subsequent dialog request and target refresh requests (not only BYE) from both parties, which basically means the To and From could be swapped (e.g. BYE is sent by the proxy, net the client). > > > thanks, > > ilker > > > Hope Google will index this to help more people :-) Michal > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/070A040C/040C4A07/0C004F0B/242…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Users] OpenSER log rotation
by Mike Williams 12 May '06

12 May '06

I've updated my little tutorial on logging and OpenSER, and would like some other, more knowledgable admins to check my logrotate configuration. You can find it in the wiki. Please mail problems back to the mailing list so I don't receive duplicate reports. Thanks. ---Mike

1 0

RE: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hi, Thanks for your reply. But I didn't understand what to do. I already have that configuration in the ser.cfg. What should I add to it so that BYE messages would allways go through SER ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Michal Matyska Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 1:32 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:38:51AM +0300, İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I am still trying to find a solution to my problem with BYe messages that are not going through SER. > Maybe someone with enough knowledge about route recording could help me with the configuration: > > My main problem with BYE messages is that they are not going through SER; the client sends it directly to my rtp proxy. as the RTP is established with it. > I need them to go through SER. How can I achieve this ? > > I don't know how to use route recording, could you explain what > following config block does ? (this is in the default configuration > but doesn't make BYE messages to go through SER) > It does (you can check by ethereal, ngrep etc.), > if (!method=="REGISTER") { > record_route(); > } but as it has another Route header pointing to the RTP proxy it leaves SER within the next block which is entered when loose_route() function has found any reasonable target in the Route headers to forward the request to .... > if (loose_route()) { > # mark routing logic in request > append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); so you can add your logic either here or into route[1] block, which might be called from other places as well (be aware) > route(1); > break; > }; > And you'll get all the subsequent dialog request and target refresh requests (not only BYE) from both parties, which basically means the To and From could be swapped (e.g. BYE is sent by the proxy, net the client). > thanks, > ilker > Hope Google will index this to help more people :-) Michal _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/03010604/01044804/070E4D03/109…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

RE: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hi everyone, I am still trying to find a solution to my problem with BYe messages that are not going through SER. Maybe someone with enough knowledge about route recording could help me with the configuration: My main problem with BYE messages is that they are not going through SER; the client sends it directly to my rtp proxy. as the RTP is established with it. I need them to go through SER. How can I achieve this ? I don't know how to use route recording, could you explain what following config block does ? (this is in the default configuration but doesn't make BYE messages to go through SER) if (!method=="REGISTER") { record_route(); } if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 12:09 AM To: fay butt; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages Hi, Thanks for your reply but this is totally a different case. In my case the problem is not CANCEL messages but BYE and ACK messages. BYE message (and also ACK) is sent to the contact of the RTP stream instead of the SER proxy. But I want these messages to be sent to SER. That's why I should somehow make them to be sent to SER. So It should be done by either recording route or changing contact header. How can I do that ? Thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of fay butt Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 7:08 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages hi, i had that problem a time ago. I just put this messege and now it's working fine. if (method == "CANCEL" ) { if (uri =~"^sip:4[0-9]*@localhost") { forward ( asterisk , 5060 ); t_relay(); break; }; }; "Ýlker Aktuna (Koç.net)" <ilkera(a)koc.net> wrote: Hi, For voice communication I use a SIP+RTP proxy together with SER. For PSTN calls SER routes the INVITE messages to the RTP proxy. Everything works fine there, but when the call is ended by one client (which is connected to SER) or the PSTN user, the BYE message does not arrive to SER. If our RTP proxy does not see the message coming from SER, call doesn't end. That's why I need all of the BYE messages to go through SER. How can I do that ? In the default configuration there is a record route process for every message other than REGISTER. But still BYE and ACK messages are not sent to SER. Should I change the contact header of the messages arriving from RTP proxy ? If so, how can I do it ? What does following configuration block do ? if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; Thanks, ilker <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/050A0207/00044F03/01004900/662…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Serusers] Two BYE's for same call
by mkumar＠mantragroup.com 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hi All, I was able to install SER and SERWEB successfully and use them. Recently I came across a problem with SER call recodring's (CDR's),few of the calls are recoded as two calls dialed at the same time to same number and when I see the call log in SERWEB I find two calls at the sametime with 3 or 4 seconds difference in their call duration. When I checked the SER DataBase I found two BYE's for the same call and SERWEB is showing them as two different calls. Please tell me how can I fix this? I am unable to get minutes dialed out by a customer for a period properly because of this. Thanks, Manoj.

1 0

[Users] VON Spring Europe
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hello, anybody in Stockholm next week at VON? We can schedule short face to face meetings. Cheers, Daniel

2 1

[Users] cacheless usrloc and socket
by Helge Waastad 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hi, maybe this has been discussed before and maybe I'm not too good in reading mailinglists, but anyhow. If you have two OpenSER proxies, no replication, and storing to the same location table, is there a way of disregading the socket information? I see in my logs: ERROR:usrloc:dbrow2info: non-local socket...ignoring, and I'm not really sure the implications of this message. Is the message ignored or is the socket information ignored? If this is not crucial, might this message be supressed in some way? br hw -- Helge Waastad Senior Konsulent Smartnet

2 1

[Users] SDP Invite message modification.
by Shane Burrell 12 May '06

12 May '06

I need to proxy and modify the Invite SDP. Can I do this from the cfg or do I need to look at a module like nathelper to modify the SDP? Below is an example Inbound to openser ---Non-Working SDP--- v=0 o=nt01-1w-lax 1234 1146761158 IN IP4 152.92.17.27 s=sip call t=0 0 m=audio 38936 RTP/AVP 0 18 101 c=IN IP4 152.92.17.27 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 converted to - > Outbound to my gateway v=0 o=ast12345sg 1220177409 1220177409 IN IP4 152.92.17.27 s=- c=IN IP4 152.92.17.27 t=0 0 a=sendrecv m=audio 18006 RTP/AVP 0 18 18 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=fmtp:18 annexb=yes TIA, Shane

2 1

[Serusers] binary distribution ...
by Cesc 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi, I have ser (0.9.x) compiled with my debian testing ... (gcc 4.0.3 ... ). In what other linux distros may i expect the binaries to run "out of the box"? what should i look for when saying "this will run here ... but not there"? Cesc

2 1

[Serusers] How can i set up a log file for SER
by Alejandro Sanchez 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hello! I need to monitoring the work done for the SER server is there a mechanism log? Thank's. Alex. ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB extra a tu correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx

2 1

[Serusers] URI rewriting
by Giuseppe Parlato 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi all I have the following URI rewriting for emergency end others special kind of numbers.. if ((uri=~"^sip:80[0-9]+@") | (uri=~"^sip:1[0-9][0-9]@")) { rewritehost("my ip address"); forward(uri:host, uri:port); break; }; I would like someone explain me how to use [] ..for instance I want to apply uri rewriting to all numbers that start with 800.xx.xx.xx, is the first one I wrote ok? Giuseppe

2 1

[Serusers] Linksys PAP2 sending 404 just after 180
by samuel 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi folks! First of all apologies if this mail shouldn't be targeted to this list but since this is full of VoIP gurus, may be somebody can help me (if anybody knows which is the most convenient list, please, point it to me). I've got a problem with a Linksys PAP2 (3.1.3) behind NAT. Both the ATA and the NAT router (not yet found out vendor/model) are in a customer's premises and I haven't got access to the internal network.... I've got two users configured in the ATA registered with received IP=NATdevice and two different ports. When somebody calls one of these users, I got 180 Ringing from one NAT port and after a few seconds I got 404 from the other port with a different To-tag, which I guess is because the router/ATA is somehow mixing users and doing some kind of forking.... SER receives the 180,404 sequence and relies back the 404, which makes impossible to call any user. This client has another ATA and both of them offers the same behaviour. The customer recently shut down the ATAs and probably there's something misconfigured....but I am completely new to the f#@#ng ATAs and I would really appreciate any hint about which of the config options of the Linksys can affect this behaviour. Thanks in advance, Samuel.

1 0

[Serusers] RTP Proxy - Download?????
by luke.2.pilgrim＠bt.com 11 May '06

11 May '06

Please help!! I've been googling for an hour but I cannot find RTP Proxy anywhere? Could someone please point me in the right direction? Any help appreciated. Luke.

3 2

RE: [Serusers] RTP Proxy - Download?????
by luke.2.pilgrim＠bt.com 11 May '06

11 May '06

Cheers! -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Andrey Kouprianov Sent: 11 May 2006 16:25 To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] RTP Proxy - Download????? hehehe... Google for these mailing list archives better ;) I just asked this question like a day ago. Anyway... It's avaialble in ftp://ftp.iptel.org/pub/rtpproxy On 5/11/06, luke.2.pilgrim(a)bt.com <luke.2.pilgrim(a)bt.com> wrote: > > > > > > Please help!! I've been googling for an hour but I cannot find RTP Proxy > anywhere? Could someone please point me in the right direction? > > > > Any help appreciated. > > > > Luke. > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

[Serusers] could not open module mysql.so
by Americania 11 May '06

11 May '06

I'm using SER 0.9.4 and MySql 4.1.19 on a Linux Suse 10 machine. I 've installed Ser with rpm If I uncomment the row with mysql.so module in the ser.cfg file, ser does not start anymore. What Can I do ? I 've attacched the cfg section and the konsole text. -------- ser.cfg : ---- # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" #loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) modparam("usrloc", "db_ur1", "sql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") .. -------------------------------------- linux:~ # ser -D -E 0(1797) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so 0(1797) ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so>: /usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory 0(1797) parse error (34,13-14): failed to load module 0(1797) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so 0(1797) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so 0(1797) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so 0(1797) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so 0(1797) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so 0(1797) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so 0(1797) loading module /usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so 0(1797) set_mod_param_regex: usrloc matches module usrloc 0(1797) set_mod_param_regex: found <db_mode> in module usrloc [/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so] 0(1797) set_mod_param_regex: usrloc matches module usrloc 0(1797) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <db_ur1> not found in module <usrloc> 0(1797) parse error (59,20-21): Can't set module parameter 0(1797) set_mod_param_regex: rr matches module rr 0(1797) set_mod_param_regex: found <enable_full_lr> in module rr [/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <mf_process_maxfwd_header> in module maxfwd [/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <record_route> in module rr [/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <loose_route> in module rr [/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <append_hf> in module textops [/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <append_hf> in module textops [/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <save> in module registrar [/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <lookup> in module registrar [/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <append_hf> in module textops [/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <lookup> in module registrar [/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <append_hf> in module textops [/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <t_relay> in module tm [/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so] 0(1797) find_export: found <sl_reply_error> in module sl_module [/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so] ERROR: bad config file (2 errors) 0(1797) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : start 0(1797) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : emptying hash table 0(1797) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : releasing timers 0(1797) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : removing semaphores 0(1797) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : destroying tmcb lists 0(1797) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : done 0(1797) shm_mem_destroy

2 1

[Serusers] Media Proxy + NAT problem
by fay butt 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi all, I have a problem since last week,I am trying to make a call between two asterisk's, SER is proxy between them on different machine on LAN. I can forward the call easily between these two astrisk's by forward command in ser.cfg, but there is no voice between these client's connected with asterisk's. when i loads the module nathelper.so in ser.cfg and force_rtp_proxy() i get's this error May 11 15:09:51 localhost /usr/sbin/ser[21556]: ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP May 11 15:09:51 localhost /usr/sbin/ser[21556]: ERROR: send_rtpp_command: can't connect to RTP proxy please help me how to solve this problem. Thanks in advance, Faisal --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

1 0

[Users] openser radius tutorial
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hello, as many of you discovered already, a tutorial about OpenSER and FreeRADIUS integration is now available at: http://openser.org/docs/openser-radius-1.0.x.html It is a step by step tutorial, with many configuration examples, which tries to reveal all the operations that can be done with RADIUS modules. Along with basic operations, the openser configuration example presents a time-based call blocking, as a proof of using together AVPs and RADIUS, confirming once more that OpenSER went beyond router concept, its powerful scripting model turning it very easy in an application server without any new development. Hopefully, the tutorial will reduce the number of questions related to radius support in openser. Feedback and improvements are welcome. Cheers, Daniel

3 7

[Users] looping problem
by unplug 11 May '06

11 May '06

I have experienced a problem (looping problem?) in the system. From the log (ngrep) below, the cancel message issues a loop and it will affect the performance of the system. User can't dial/receive call after the loop happened. How and why this loop will created? Does it related to the rtpproxy that I am using in the system? Any one can give me some hints? Thanks, unplug Note: 10.200.0.228 is an openser server. filter: (ip) and ( port 5060 ) U 10.200.0.228:5060 -> 10.200.0.228:5060 CANCEL sip:85234163634@10.200.0.228 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.3ffb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.2ffb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.1ffb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.0ffb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.fefb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.eefb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.defb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.cefb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.befb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.aefb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.9efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.8efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.7efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.6efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.4efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.92:5060;branch=z9hG4bKrmPCJR8Xm6JKY4o8. Max-Forwards: 55. User-Agent: Koncept KE10XX v4.32.14 00-09-45-0a-fc-29. From: "871966760539" <sip:871966760539@10.200.0.228>;tag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy. To: "85234163634" <sip:85234163634@10.200.0.228>. Call-ID: WfigvZ4YJatMKamV(a)10.0.0.92. Contact: <sip:871966760539@10.0.0.92:5060>. CSeq: 1 CANCEL. Content-Length: 0. . # U 10.200.0.228:5060 -> 10.200.0.228:5060 SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.201bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.101bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.001bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.ff0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.ef0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.df0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.cf0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.bf0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.af0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.9f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.8f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.7f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.6f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.5f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.4f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.92:5060;branch=z9hG4bKjMEHTGhvWKHZ0R2J. From: "871966760539" <sip:871966760539@10.200.0.228>;tag=SM4dtzpkDKYyCkzu. To: "8521878200" <sip:8521878200@10.200.0.228>;tag=4cdbaed0e769eb1d9b81f5252847cf64-3d33. Call-ID: nQCHB6bq42pOheks(a)10.0.0.92. CSeq: 1 CANCEL. Server: OpenSer (1.0.1 (i386/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 10.200.0.228:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=3174 req_src_ip=10.200.0.228 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:8521878200@10.200.0.228 out_uri=sip:8521878200@10.200.0.228 via_cnt==0". . ######## U 10.200.0.228:5060 -> 10.200.0.228:5060 SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.bf0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.af0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.9f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.8f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.7f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.6f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.5f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bK5002.4f0bae66.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.92:5060;branch=z9hG4bKjMEHTGhvWKHZ0R2J. From: "871966760539" <sip:871966760539@10.200.0.228>;tag=SM4dtzpkDKYyCkzu. To: "8521878200" <sip:8521878200@10.200.0.228>;tag=4cdbaed0e769eb1d9b81f5252847cf64-ab74. Call-ID: nQCHB6bq42pOheks(a)10.0.0.92. CSeq: 1 CANCEL. Server: OpenSer (1.0.1 (i386/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 10.200.0.228:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=3174 req_src_ip=10.200.0.228 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:8521878200@10.200.0.228 out_uri=sip:8521878200@10.200.0.228 via_cnt==0". . ########### U 10.200.0.228:5060 -> 10.200.0.228:5060 CANCEL sip:85292558811@10.200.0.228 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.edcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.ddcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.cdcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.bdcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.adcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.9dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.8dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.7dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.6dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.5dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.4dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.3dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.2dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.1dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.0dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.fccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.eccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.dccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.cccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.bccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.accf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.9ccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.8ccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.7ccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.6ccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.92:5060;branch=z9hG4bKlpjLoMyFjsI1BvQL. Max-Forwards: 45. User-Agent: Koncept KE10XX v4.32.14 00-09-45-0a-fc-29. From: "871966760539" <sip:871966760539@10.200.0.228>;tag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5. To: "85292558811" <sip:85292558811@10.200.0.228>. Call-ID: 8p3FIbMUfYMXOuW3(a)10.0.0.92. Contact: <sip:871966760539@10.0.0.92:5060>. CSeq: 1 CANCEL. Content-Length: 0. . ### U 10.200.0.228:5060 -> 10.200.0.228:5060 CANCEL sip:85234163634@10.200.0.228 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy;lr=on>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.3ffb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.2ffb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.1ffb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.0ffb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.fefb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.eefb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.defb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.cefb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.befb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.aefb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.9efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.8efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.7efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.6efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf34.4efb2934.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.92:5060;branch=z9hG4bKrmPCJR8Xm6JKY4o8. Max-Forwards: 55. User-Agent: Koncept KE10XX v4.32.14 00-09-45-0a-fc-29. From: "871966760539" <sip:871966760539@10.200.0.228>;tag=ckRP8FNJugUqMOjy. To: "85234163634" <sip:85234163634@10.200.0.228>. Call-ID: WfigvZ4YJatMKamV(a)10.0.0.92. Contact: <sip:871966760539@10.0.0.92:5060>. CSeq: 1 CANCEL. Content-Length: 0. . ######## U 10.200.0.228:5060 -> 10.200.0.228:5060 CANCEL sip:85292558811@10.200.0.228 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Record-Route: <sip:10.200.0.228;ftag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5;lr=on>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.cdcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.bdcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.adcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.9dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.8dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.7dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.6dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.5dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.4dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.3dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.2dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.1dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.0dcf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.fccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.eccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.dccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.cccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.bccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.accf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.9ccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.8ccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.7ccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.200.0.228;branch=z9hG4bKf9f4.6ccf03a7.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.92:5060;branch=z9hG4bKlpjLoMyFjsI1BvQL. Max-Forwards: 47. User-Agent: Koncept KE10XX v4.32.14 00-09-45-0a-fc-29. From: "871966760539" <sip:871966760539@10.200.0.228>;tag=MySoSexGPE0vUXa5. To: "85292558811" <sip:85292558811@10.200.0.228>. Call-ID: 8p3FIbMUfYMXOuW3(a)10.0.0.92. Contact: <sip:871966760539@10.0.0.92:5060>. CSeq: 1 CANCEL. Content-Length: 0. .

3 9

[Users] strict to loose - Route Header not removed
by Walter Schober 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hello! Acc to 3261, 16.4: the proxy MUST replace the Request-URI in the request with the last value from the Route header field, and remove that value from the Route header field. The proxy MUST then proceed as if it received this modified request. The loose_route() function does only the half on my if (looose_route()) { .. t_relay() .. } script. It replaces the RURI with the value of the last Route header, but then doesn't remove it, causing problems on the last hop. The strict.txt contains a ACK with comes in strict and leaves loose - with the Route header. Aliases are configured with ip.ip.ip.ip and ip.ip.ip.ip:5060. Why is the Route header not stripped? Walter

2 6

RE: [Serusers] SER and XCAP Server
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 11 May '06

11 May '06

At this time using DB is not very important for us. I just need a working configuration. I don't know why it doesn't work even if I do everything as described in the book. I am desperately seeking help... Thanks for everything you do... ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 11:45 AM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: Miguel Freitas; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER and XCAP Server Hi Ilker, this will not help you - in your case is a problem with routing, but I don't know what. You don't need "db_mode" or "use_db" parameters set if you don't want to use database as backup. It is useful if you want it for "failover" (to restore existing subscriptions on SER startup). Vaclav On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 11:37:50AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi, > > Would that correction be a solution to my case ? > If so, which version should I try (CVS or snapshot) ? > And what configuration is correct ? > > Thanks, > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] > On Behalf Of Vaclav Kubart > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 11:33 AM > To: Miguel Freitas > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER and XCAP Server > > I have corrected it on CVS and added new snapshot version 4.1 with this correction on ftp.iptel.org. It is not tested like normal snapshot, but it seems to be working for the first look. > > The settings > modparam("rls", "db_mode", 1) > says that only resource list subscriptions (subscriptions to resource lists NOT subscriptions to standalone users) will be stored into database. If you want to store subscriptions to standalone users and published information you have to set > modparam("pa", "use_db", 1) > > [more information about module parameters you can read in presence > handbook in description of PA and RLS module] > > Vaclav > > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Miguel Freitas wrote: > > just glad of being useful > > > > Thanks for your feedback! > > > > One last question: subscriptions are stored on the SER DB? > > I have <modparam("rls", "db_mode", 1)> on the config file > > > > Miguel > > > > > > On 5/10/06, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart(a)iptel.org> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> I was missing line > > >> lookup_user("To"); > > > > > >It was missing in the presence handbook too - it will be corrected > > >in next version. > > > > > >> > > >> Shouldn't the resource list of subscriptions be stored on the SER DB? > > >> Because I'm getting that Waning all the time and I can't find any > > >> entry related with subscriptions (table rls_subscription, ...) > > > > > >No DB is not problem there. I will correct it in CVS - this warning > > >will not be displayed if parameter will be "0". > > > > > > > > > > >I have captured SIP and HTTP packets with Ethereal, sending file.. > > >> (It doesn't include packets changed between SER and apache > > >> because they > > >are > > >> on the same machine and I don't have access to it right now) SER > > >> and apache on 193.136.93.140 SIP domain = itav140.av.it.pt > > >> eyeBeam <sip:4004@193.136.93.252> and <sip:4002@193.136.92.68 > > > >> After register, client <sip:4002@193.136.92.68 > > >> <sip:4002@193.136.92.68>> changes his status to Away (packet 53) > > >> <sip:4004> receives the new presence status of <sip:4002> (packet > > >> 55 and > > >75) > > >> But when <sip:4002> renew his PUBLISH (packet 79) he doesn't > > >> include a message body with his presence state. > > >> So, the subsequent NOTIFY received by <sip:4004> (packet 85) > > >> doesn't > > >include > > >> the presence status Away any more, even thou <sip:4002> hasn't > > >> changed > > >his > > >> status. > > >> After that, the client <sip:4004> shows <sip:4002> as Available, > > >> when he > > >is > > >> Away. > > > > > >Bingo! You have found a bug in SER - thanks! I have read it in RFC > > >now, and in the case of empty body needs the state be refreshed, > > >not cleared as was done. I will correct it soon. > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/000C0601/04034E04/05044D > 06/13414162.jpg> > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor > olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. > This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/05090204/0D014B04/00004903/161…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

RE: [Serusers] SER and XCAP Server
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi, Would that correction be a solution to my case ? If so, which version should I try (CVS or snapshot) ? And what configuration is correct ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Vaclav Kubart Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 11:33 AM To: Miguel Freitas Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER and XCAP Server I have corrected it on CVS and added new snapshot version 4.1 with this correction on ftp.iptel.org. It is not tested like normal snapshot, but it seems to be working for the first look. The settings modparam("rls", "db_mode", 1) says that only resource list subscriptions (subscriptions to resource lists NOT subscriptions to standalone users) will be stored into database. If you want to store subscriptions to standalone users and published information you have to set modparam("pa", "use_db", 1) [more information about module parameters you can read in presence handbook in description of PA and RLS module] Vaclav On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 06:13:06PM +0100, Miguel Freitas wrote: > just glad of being useful > > Thanks for your feedback! > > One last question: subscriptions are stored on the SER DB? > I have <modparam("rls", "db_mode", 1)> on the config file > > Miguel > > > On 5/10/06, Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart(a)iptel.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> I was missing line > >> lookup_user("To"); > > > >It was missing in the presence handbook too - it will be corrected in > >next version. > > > >> > >> Shouldn't the resource list of subscriptions be stored on the SER DB? > >> Because I'm getting that Waning all the time and I can't find any > >> entry related with subscriptions (table rls_subscription, ...) > > > >No DB is not problem there. I will correct it in CVS - this warning > >will not be displayed if parameter will be "0". > > > > > >I have captured SIP and HTTP packets with Ethereal, sending file.. > >> (It doesn't include packets changed between SER and apache because > >> they > >are > >> on the same machine and I don't have access to it right now) SER > >> and apache on 193.136.93.140 SIP domain = itav140.av.it.pt eyeBeam > >> <sip:4004@193.136.93.252> and <sip:4002@193.136.92.68 > After > >> register, client <sip:4002@193.136.92.68 <sip:4002@193.136.92.68>> > >> changes his status to Away (packet 53) <sip:4004> receives the new > >> presence status of <sip:4002> (packet 55 and > >75) > >> But when <sip:4002> renew his PUBLISH (packet 79) he doesn't > >> include a message body with his presence state. > >> So, the subsequent NOTIFY received by <sip:4004> (packet 85) > >> doesn't > >include > >> the presence status Away any more, even thou <sip:4002> hasn't > >> changed > >his > >> status. > >> After that, the client <sip:4004> shows <sip:4002> as Available, > >> when he > >is > >> Away. > > > >Bingo! You have found a bug in SER - thanks! I have read it in RFC > >now, and in the case of empty body needs the state be refreshed, not > >cleared as was done. I will correct it soon. > > > > Vaclav > > > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/000C0601/04034E04/05044D06/134…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

Re: [Serusers] SER and XCAP Server
by Vaclav Kubart 11 May '06

11 May '06

On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 03:24:51PM +0100, Miguel Freitas wrote: > > > >It is no problem if you have in config file something like this: > > > > if (method=="SUBSCRIBE") { > > ... > > if (@to.tag=="") { > > ... > > } > > else { > > if (!handle_rls_subscription("0")) { > > lookup_user("To"); > > handle_subscription("registrar"); > > } > > } > > > >This means that SUBSCRIBE requests with nonempty to tag (renewal > >subscriptions) are handled by RLS module first and if it fails (for > >example the subscription doesn't exist) it is handled by PA. In the case > >of unexisting resource list subscription it shows this warning. > > > I was missing line > lookup_user("To"); It was missing in the presence handbook too - it will be corrected in next version. > > Shouldn't the resource list of subscriptions be stored on the SER DB? > Because I'm getting that Waning all the time and I can't find any entry > related with subscriptions (table rls_subscription, ...) No DB is not problem there. I will correct it in CVS - this warning will not be displayed if parameter will be "0". > > > >Could you send network dump of such messages? > > > > > I have captured SIP and HTTP packets with Ethereal, sending file.. > (It doesn't include packets changed between SER and apache because they are > on the same machine and I don't have access to it right now) > SER and apache on 193.136.93.140 > SIP domain = itav140.av.it.pt > eyeBeam <sip:4004@193.136.93.252> and <sip:4002@193.136.92.68 > > After register, client <sip:4002@193.136.92.68 <sip:4002@193.136.92.68>> > changes his status to Away (packet 53) > <sip:4004> receives the new presence status of <sip:4002> (packet 55 and 75) > But when <sip:4002> renew his PUBLISH (packet 79) he doesn't include a > message body with his presence state. > So, the subsequent NOTIFY received by <sip:4004> (packet 85) doesn't include > the presence status Away any more, even thou <sip:4002> hasn't changed his > status. > After that, the client <sip:4004> shows <sip:4002> as Available, when he is > Away. Bingo! You have found a bug in SER - thanks! I have read it in RFC now, and in the case of empty body needs the state be refreshed, not cleared as was done. I will correct it soon. Vaclav

2 2

[Serusers] Running SER Server behind NAT
by Alan 11 May '06

11 May '06

Is it possible to run SER SIP server behind a NAT? If so, what type of configuration changes am i looking at? My current scenario is as follows. Internet <-----> Pix (12.x.x.x translates to 10.x.x.x) <----> SIP Server Requests to and from the internet have a static NAT translation rule in a PIX firewall. Traffic flows from the outside global IP to an inside NAT'ed IP (non-routable) and vice versa. The SIP server's interface is configured with a non-routable IP addresss (10.x.x.x) for example. My problem is related to the message header and the ACK has a record route with the 10.x.x.x in it. Please help.

2 1

[Serusers] Re: Serusers Digest, Vol 37, Issue 3 -- IM + Presence help
by Suraj Kumar 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi Vaclav, Thanks for the help! That helped!! However, when I registered two users from windows messanger, I can login but I cannot see them with the serctl ul show command which shows the following message : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 500 Command 'ul_dump' not found >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If i add a contact in the IM client, SER displays the following message: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subscription to invalid user sip:201@xxx.xxx.248.115 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have used the config sample from the example with DB in the presence hand book: but my user location is set as follows : modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) Thanks a lot! Suraj

2 1

[Users] problem in sending bye
by openser user 11 May '06

11 May '06

hi all, do any one faced a problem like, if i call a person and i will cut(disconnect) the call before it rings. even after cutting the call before it ring's the called person will get a ring. but when i cut the call after it rings it works properly(mean to say the called person gets disconnet before the called person pickup the call). with regards openseruser --------------------------------- Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new. Click here Send instant messages to your online friends - NOW

1 0

[Serusers] SER+asterisk MOH
by dashy dude 11 May '06

11 May '06

Dear All I am trying to deliver MOH service in the following manner; _____ _____ _____ |UA1 |<--->|SER |<--->|UA2| ______ _____ _____ | | ________ |Asterisk| ________ When UA1 is talking to UA2, either of them presses a hold button, and asterisk serves MOH Requesting all the gurus to comment on whether it is possible. and will appreciate if someone can guide what is needed on SER. Thanks D __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 3

[Users] Regarding on " radtest "
by raviprakash sunkara 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi Everybody I'm working on openser + freeradius. Recently Installed both . I had a issue below onw, actual what this means... By Typing '" radtest 444 444 192.168.2.55 1812 radiustest " its shows below one. Sending Access-Request of id 236 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "444" User-Password = "444" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 Re-sending Access-Request of id 236 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "444" User-Password = "444" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) Hyperion Technology www.hyperion-tech.com

1 0

[Serusers] Ser start but no PID
by Linh Pham 11 May '06

11 May '06

Hi, I compile SER 0.9.6 from source on a computer running Fedora Core 4. I suppose make all, make install all go well as I can't see any warning or error. When I start ser, it seems normal but I can't find the pid with ps. [root@localhost ~]# serctl start Starting SER : started pid(18726) [root@localhost ~]# ser Listening on udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 udp: 192.168.1.4 [192.168.1.4]:5060 udp: 192.168.1.17 [192.168.1.17]:5060 tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 tcp: 192.168.1.4 [192.168.1.4]:5060 tcp: 192.168.1.17 [192.168.1.17]:5060 Aliases: tcp: localhost:5060 tcp: localhost.localdomain:5060 udp: localhost:5060 udp: localhost.localdomain:5060 [root@localhost ~]# serctl stop Stopping SER : /usr/local/sbin/serctl: line 813: kill: (18726) - No such processstopped [root@localhost ~]# How can I fix this so ser run normally? Thank you. -- Best regards, Linh Pham

2 4

[Users] Comma-Separated Via Header
by Dioris Moreno 10 May '06

10 May '06

I was making some fax tests using a Cisco AS5300, OpenSER 1.0.1 and a Grandstream HandyTone 486. Everything results fine when I previously make the same test directly from the HandyTone to the AS5300, however when I put OpenSER in the middle the fax connection could not be established. Checking captures at both ends, I noticed the HandyTone was not receiving the OK response to its RE-INVITE request, but the AS5300 was sending it. Looking a capture in the OpenSER, I suppose it didn't send the OK response from the AS5300 to the HandyTone because the format of the Via Header used by the AS5300. Look at the captures below, the AS5300 sends the Via header in a comma-separated format instead using a line for each one. Is there a way to workaround this? I think my best option is to modify the OpenSER code to support both formats. Is this something that somebody already does it? If the answer it is not, where can I start? I'll appreciate any help. Dioris Moreno Cisco AS5300 IP Address: AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD OpenSER IP Address: WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ Grandstream HT486 IP Address: FFF.GGG.HHH.III Calling Party Number (PSTN): UserA Called Party Number (VoIP): UserB Message From OpenSER to Cisco AS5300 Session Initiation Protocol Request-Line: INVITE sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD:5060 SIP/2.0 Method: INVITE Resent Packet: False Message Header Record-Route: <sip:WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ;ftag=266f5f157860b9ca;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ;branch=z9hG4bK6a82.677fb8e1.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP FFF.GGG.HHH.III:50841;branch=z9hG4bK90436408698e6881 From: <sip:UserB@WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ>;tag=266f5f157860b9ca SIP from address: sip:UserB@WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ SIP tag: 266f5f157860b9ca To: <sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD>;tag=D33F86B0-94F SIP to address: sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD SIP tag: D33F86B0-94F Message From Cisco AS5300 to OpenSER Session Initiation Protocol Status-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK Status-Code: 200 Resent Packet: False Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ;branch=z9hG4bK6a82.677fb8e1.0,SIP/2.0/UDP FFF.GGG.HHH.III:50841;branch=z9hG4bK90436408698e6881 From: <sip:UserB@WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ>;tag=266f5f157860b9ca SIP from address: sip:UserB@WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ SIP tag: 266f5f157860b9ca To: <sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD>;tag=D33F86B0-94F SIP to address: sip:UserA@AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD SIP tag: D33F86B0-94F

3 2

[Users] Stateful Transfers
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

I got a big problem here that I don't know how to fix. An OpenSER system forwards calls from phones to Asterisk boxes. Up until now we had been using the dispatcher to evenly distribute calls to the Asterisk boxes. However, when someone transfers a call, using the dispatcher, the call can go to a different Asterisk box, which breaks the transfer. I need to find some way to make OpenSER route transfers to the same Asterisk system. I'm not sure how to do this. If there was some way to, upon an INVITE, check and see if there was already a call in progress for that user and then send it to the same Asterisk system. Would stateful processing help in this way? Can stateful processing 'remember' that there's a call already in progress like this, or does the stateful simply relate to stateful processing of a single call from INVITE to OK/ACK? Doug.

2 1

[Users] failure_route
by D'Addelfio Davide 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi all, i have 2 questions for the forum: 1) What can I do to simulate a failure message to understand if openser store it into database, through acc_db_request? 2) Have I any chance to get information from reply messages, like storing some in db or something else? I know I can't use acc and avp module in on_reply route block, so any suggestion? Thanks in advance Davide

2 1

[Users] Call routing
by Jeff Williams 10 May '06

10 May '06

This is not openser specific, but can I just check my understanding of the SIP RFC? Given an INVITE where the Request-URI is different from the To field, a UAS should route the INVITE based on the Request-URI, correct? The reason I ask it that I am having problems integrating openser with a proprietry SIP proxy as the proprietry proxy routes INVITES based on the To field. Jeff

2 1

RE: [Users] clustering
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

Then, if system N fails, all systems >N also fail. That's not very redundant. > -----Original Message----- > From: Edson [mailto:4lists@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:01 AM > To: Douglas Garstang; 'Bogdan-Andrei Iancu'; 'unplug' > Cc: users(a)openser.org > Subject: RE: [Users] clustering > > > Create a 'chain' of t_replicate (1->2->3->...->n). Than You > can have 'n' > Proxies in the 'cluster'... > > Edson. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: users-bounces(a)openser.org > [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On > > Behalf Of Douglas Garstang > > Sent: quarta-feira, 10 de maio de 2006 11:49 > > To: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu; unplug > > Cc: users(a)openser.org > > Subject: RE: [Users] clustering > > > > Yes, but t_replicate() only allows you to replicate to ONE > other OpenSER > > system. Two OpenSER systems is not a redundant configuration - 3 is > > redundant. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 5:28 AM > > > To: unplug > > > Cc: users(a)openser.org > > > Subject: Re: [Users] clustering > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > try yo google on the mailing list - the topic was often > > > debated. search > > > also for t_replicate() and replication. > > > > > > regards, > > > bogdan > > > > > > unplug wrote: > > > > > > > How to do the clustering of openser? Any reference? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Users mailing list > > > > Users(a)openser.org > > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > Users(a)openser.org > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users(a)openser.org > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >

5 6

[Users] call forwarding and billing
by Jayesh Nambiar 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi folks, I have implemented the openser.cfg with forwarding and voicemail features completely. Only problem is, if the user is forwarding the call on a pstn number how should he be billed, as the one who has forwarded is accountable and not the one who called. I have implemented forwarding using avps serial forking method. I've read about multiple leg accounting and was not successful in understanding it properly. The docs only mention to set the parametrs and after I set the params, I get a n/a in src_leg and dst_leg column. Can someone pls give me examples of successfully using multiple leg accounting in openser.cfg. Is it like, the call leg accounting will only take place if there is a 3XX response from the server. I am asking this as my cfg does not produce any 302 response, but creates a brand new Invite request for the forwarded call. Can someone pls tell me more about multi-leg accounting. Also I read about the diversion module which can be used in the forwarding scenarios. But I added the diversion header and forwarded the call to Cisco gateway, it gave a 400 Bad Request reponse saying 'Malformed CC-Diversion/Diversion/CC-Redirect Header'. Can someone explain what does this mean. It will help me a lot as this is the only thing I am left with. Thanks a lot in advance. w/regards, Jayesh --------------------------------- Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.

2 3

[Users] OpenSER Docs
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

Has anyone seen any good OpenSER documentation, or know of any training courses in North America that relate directly to OpenSER? I've been involved with OpenSER for about 6 months now and the available documentation has remained about the same - REALLY BAD. Thanks, Doug

3 3

[Serusers] RPID?
by Ricardo Martinez 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hello. Sorry for this stupid question. Can someone explain to me how the RPID parameter is used?. Can i use this parameter for other purposes ? Hope thank someone can help me. Thanks in advance. Regards, Ricardo.-

2 1

[Users] openser and History-Info (RFC 4244) for VM/UM application
by john hess 10 May '06

10 May '06

hi, does anyone have experience in using openser in processing call-forwarding/redirection signaled in the History-Info section (as per RFC 4244)? the application context is openser as a means to interpolate signaling between an IP PBX and a SIP-speaking VM/UM platform (I^3 Communite -- v2.3.1). the problem i am trying to solve (at least in the near-term) is that the Avaya is using History-Info to signal call-forwarding events (ex: CFNA, CFB) while Communite is expecting call-forwarding to be signaled via Diversion. until the platforms support have a call-forwarding signaling method in common, i would like to be able to insert openser into the signaling path -- more or less as a translator between the two platforms. tia, john john hess <jhess(a)berkeley.edu> nocman ist, uc berkeley 510 643-6401

3 3

[Users] Anyone interested in WIKI for setup ?
by Shane Burrell 10 May '06

10 May '06

We for the most part have openser working with MAXTNT but I'd really like to see what other people are actually doing with it. Is a user wiki something of interest? Shane

2 1

[Serusers] Is it possible to run SER SIP server behind a NAT?
by Alan 10 May '06

10 May '06

Is it possible to run SER SIP server behind a NAT? If so, what type of configuration changes am i looking at? My current scenario is as follows. Internet <-----> Pix (12.x.x.x translates to 10.x.x.x) <----> SIP Server Requests to and from the internet have a static NAT translation rule in the PIX. Traffic flows from the outside global IP to an inside NAT'ed IP (non-routable) and vice versa. The SIP server's interface is configured with a non-routable IP addresss (10.x.x.x) for example. My problem is related to the message header and the ACK has a record route with the 10.x.x.x in it. Please help.

1 0

[Serusers] Q:ABOUT:ACCOUNTING:SER&SERWEB
by Alejandro Sanchez 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hello, When we enter to Serweb it displays the users view, then we click in the accounting option and it displays the message "No calls", although users have accounting information indeed, the acc table contains accounting data of users. Ser is configured with the Accounting provided by Ser itself (not by Radius). We had done some debuging and found that the reason why it is not displaying any information is because the sql query (in method.get_acc_entires.php) does not match with the information in the DB, especificaly in the where section of sql query the domain field doesn't match. The application is expecting to find in domain field the IP where SER is running and the DB has in domain field the IP of caller's PC. Why SER is storing the IP of the caller in the domain field? is this correct? if so, why the query is expecting the SER IP in that field instead? How can we fix this? Thank you in advance Best regards, Alex ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB extra a tu correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx

1 0

[Users] Regarding on radiusd.conf file
by raviprakash sunkara 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hello Everybody, I'm working on openser, recently I install freeradius for "AAA". By seeing the Documentation from " http://openser.org/docs/openser-radius-1.0.x.html " I followed that. While testing the radius server by ' radiusd -X " its shows radiusd.conf[1840] unknown Auth-type " Digest" in authenticate section ---> what its means. And also By Typing '" radtest 444 444 192.168.2.55 1812 radiustest " its shows below one. Sending Access-Request of id 236 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "444" User-Password = "444" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 Re-sending Access-Request of id 236 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "444" User-Password = "444" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 What its means one . Is it error ? I run this in my box . where in my box installed openser , freeradius and radiusclinet-ng.. Please help me and main thing is, Is any mistakes in my english please excuse me.. -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) ravi.sunkara(a)hyperion-tech.com Hyperion Technology www.hyperion-tech.com

1 0

RE: [Users] clustering
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

Yes, but t_replicate() only allows you to replicate to ONE other OpenSER system. Two OpenSER systems is not a redundant configuration - 3 is redundant. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 5:28 AM > To: unplug > Cc: users(a)openser.org > Subject: Re: [Users] clustering > > > Hi, > > try yo google on the mailing list - the topic was often > debated. search > also for t_replicate() and replication. > > regards, > bogdan > > unplug wrote: > > > How to do the clustering of openser? Any reference? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users(a)openser.org > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)openser.org > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >

2 1

RE: [Users] About: Developer's Guide
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

I really believe that people adding to the documentation by exploring themselves is a VERY BAD idea. When you do this, you make assumptions based on the information you currently have available to you. When that information is incomplete, you make incorrect assumptions. You find that later on, things break in certain conditions because your assumptions where bad in the first place. You also contribute to more bad information when you write documentation based on what you THINK you know, and make it available to others. This is why the people who know the product the best, the developers, should be the ones writing the documentation. Doug. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 5:00 AM > To: suzhaofeng > Cc: users > Subject: Re: [Users] About: Developer's Guide > > > Hi, > > unfortunately there is no manual for openser development. but if you > take the chance to explore by your self, feel free to use the devel > mailing list for your questions. > > regards, > bogdan > > suzhaofeng wrote: > > > Dear openser team: > > > > Our company want to use openser develop our system. > > Do you have any Developer's Guide about openser? we need some > > documents to help us > > understand the openser's code. > > The main difficulty is: > > 1. How to the openser init? where is the init code > for rout list? > > 2. where is the code for receive sip message and send > sip message? > > We want to know the whole system's work logic and the program > > run flow. > > > > Thank you for your help! > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------- > > your truly: suzhaofeng > > 2006-05-08 > > > >------------------------------------------------------------- > ----------- > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Users mailing list > >Users(a)openser.org > >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)openser.org > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >

1 0

R: [Users] problem with exec_dset
by D'Addelfio Davide 10 May '06

10 May '06

Have you tried with: exec_dset("sh fwdnoanswer1.sh '$tU'"); I had the same problem with another script.... Davide ________________________________ Da: users-bounces(a)openser.org [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] Per conto di openser user Inviato: sabato 6 maggio 2006 9.24 A: users(a)openser.org Oggetto: [Users] problem with exec_dset hi all, i am trying to send $tU in exec_dset function. my function look like this exec_dset("fwdnoanswer1.sh '$tU'"); in this function my script fwdnoanswer1.sh will take $tU as an input and check my database to get the forward number and it has to dail out to fwd number. when i runned script manually it was giving proper result. but when i used this script in exec_dset i am not getting fwd number. can any one please help me how to use this exec_dset() function. according to me the script is not taking that value $tU. with regards openseruser ________________________________ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new. Click here <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/in/mailanswers/*http:/in.answers.yahoo.com>

1 0

[Serusers] How to STOP logging reINVITE
by sip 10 May '06

10 May '06

Is there a way I can avoid logging reINVITEs in SER? I've been as yet unable to come up with one. N.

2 2

Re:[Serusers] SER and XCAP Server
by Miguel Freitas 10 May '06

10 May '06

> I think that all these problems are due to slow access (or inaccessible) > XCAP server from SER machine. > > That was absolutely right, thanks! I didn't realize that the interface lo (localhost) was down, so SER hasn't able to access the web server because those services are on the same machine. The Presence Agent is now working, the clients have access to the presence status of each other. Changes on the presence status of one client reflects on the GUI of the other clientes. But I'm getting some warnings on SER log: WARN: rls_handler.c:326: can't refresh unknown subscription Each client initialy SUBSCRIBE to event presence, presence.winfo and "sip-profile;profile-typeapplication;app-id=resource-lists", the last one not supported by SER and not renewed anymore. On ser.cfg I have: modparam("pa", "accept_internal_subscriptions", 0) Despite the Presence Agent being apparently working, when one client A changes his presence state to other state than Available (and sends a PUBLISH Event:presence to SER containing application/pidf+xml with the new state), the other clients that have subscribed to presence event of client A receive a NOTIFY with the client's A new presence state BUT the subsequent NOTIFYs don't include that state anymore and thus the other clients show client A as Available when he's not. May it be because the client's A PUBLISH only include application/pidf+xml when client A changes presence state? Subsequent PUBLISH send to SER don't include a message body.

2 1

[Users] Hiding Contact or Via fields
by Marco Meinardi 10 May '06

10 May '06

Dear Sirs, being new to SIP and OpenSer, I have read the SIP introduction and Admin's Guide, but there still is an issue that I could not find information about. I would like to set up a SIP infrastructure made of many UAs and one SIP proxy (OpenSer). I want to bypass any NAT configuration so that I will use UAs with STUN support and mediaproxy module on OpenSer; I will perform billing (accounting) on the SIP proxy, so I will use record route on OpenSer. I want to make sure that my accounting will *never* be bypassed. This seems quite difficult because the fields 'Contact' and 'Via' contain the real address of the UA (or the translated one in case of NAT configuration) and the SIP header will be fowarded to the other UA. Sniffing the network for SIP packets, any user will be able to know the real address of the UA and make direct call bypassing the SIP proxy. How could I secure this situation, avoiding to forward Contact and Via fields containing the real UA address? I was thinking if it is possible to replace UA address with SIP proxy address, or would I break any protocol rule? Thank you in advance!! Best regards, -- Marco Meinardi <m.meinardi(a)reteitaly.com> ReteItaly S.r.l. www.reteitaly.com _____________________________________________ C.so Svizzera, 185 - 10149 Torino - Italy Tel. +39 011 7767694 - Mobile +39 335 7878604 Fax +39 011 746179 _____________________________________________

3 4

[Users] docbooc on ubuntu
by Klaus Darilion 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi! I've tried to compile the docs on ubuntu. It compiles without problems, but the result is only garbage (tags mixed with text). I never had issues on debian stable. Do I need a certain package? Has anyone else seen such problems? regards klaus

2 1

RE: [Serusers] media and RTP -proxy
by Aimable Habiyakare 10 May '06

10 May '06

I suggest you try to get it from onsip.org website They have them. -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Ladislav Andel Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 7:52 PM To: Andrey Kouprianov; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] media and RTP -proxy Andrey Kouprianov wrote: > Guys, hi! > > Where can I download mediaproxy and RTPProxy tar balls??? I see that > RTPPRoxy download from Portaone's site was discontinued? And I did not > find a single link for mediaproxy either (though it should be > downloadable from iptel.org, is that right?) > > Eagerly waiting for your reply. Anyone's reply.... > > Andrey. > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

[Users] clustering
by unplug 10 May '06

10 May '06

How to do the clustering of openser? Any reference?

2 1

[Users] web interface using asp
by Jayesh Nambiar 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi all, We are developing a web interface for openser on asp.net. We do not want want to use php for some reasons. What I wanted to know is, Is there any way I can use fifo commands through asp using some kind of xml or something like that. Please let me know if anyone has used asp.net for front end to openser. I need to enable all the provisioning via web. Can someone please guide me on this. Thanks in advance... Jayesh. --------------------------------- Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new. Click here

2 1

[Users] Wrong URI in REGISTER
by Bruno Machado 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi fellows Our proxy is receiving some REGISTERs with wrong URI. The SOURCE PORT is inserted in it (the same number or incremented by 1). Our customers use Grandstream HT 486, 487. This problems is happening with 10 of them. This error happens just in REGISTER messages. If these customers make a call, they will talk without any problems. I can say this error isnt belong to a firmware version: some customers use the most new version and others of them use another. Did anybody already see this behavior? (running ngrep in SIP Proxy) U 201.58.X.Y:50142 -> IP_PROXY:5060 REGISTER si:50143p:domain_proxy.com.br SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 201.58.X.Y:50143;branch=z9hG4bKc5d3893e4a5ca0b6 From: <sip:3101@domain_proxy.com.br>;tag=148c0dd3bf6183fe To: <sip:3101@domain_proxy.com.br> Contact: * Call-ID: e72069564c2a8e01@10.1.1.4..CSeq: 11609 REGISTER Expires: 0 User-Agent: Grandstream HT487 1.0.6.7 Max-Forwards: 70 Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE Content-Length: 0 --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger com voz - Instale agora e faça ligações de graça.

2 1

[Serusers] accounting problem
by AR. 10 May '06

10 May '06

Dear All When I use the db or the radius server to log the accounting information, i got a problem i got only "BYE" informaion if use PSTN. Anyone help? Thanks AR.

2 4

[Users] limiting number of calls
by Jayesh Nambiar 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi, how can the dialog module help prevent the issue of missing BYEs?? Is dialog module capable of monitoring the sessions going on in openser. I also wanted to ask that if i try limiting the no. of calls that per user can receicve how do i match the invite with the byes. for eg: I may allow some users to have 5 incoming calls and other 2 and so on. So, I'll have to store that value in the DB table somewhere, and when a user receives a call, this column will be checked and the value should be decremented when he receives the invite message. But how do i again increment the value, when the user receives bye. I mean how do i write the logic to match the invite and byes so as to increment and decrement the simultaneous calls value. please help me regarding this.... thanks in advance. jayesh. --------------------------------- Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new. Click here

3 4

[Users] About: Developer's Guide
by suzhaofeng 10 May '06

10 May '06

Dear openser team: Our company want to use openser develop our system. Do you have any Developer's Guide about openser? we need some documents to help us understand the openser's code. The main difficulty is: 1. How to the openser init? where is the init code for rout list? 2. where is the code for receive sip message and send sip message? We want to know the whole system's work logic and the program run flow. Thank you for your help! your truly: suzhaofeng 2006-05-08

2 1

[Users] Could not run openser
by Srinath Ramachandra 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi All, I need your help in installing and running OpenSER (www.openser.org <http://www.openser.org/> ) on RedHat Linux 9.0. I downloaded the latest tarball (openser_1.0.1-tls_linux_i386_tar.gz) and installed it in /usr/local/sbin. But when I try to run by typing "openser" at the prompt, I see the following error message: "error while loading shared libraries:libssl.so.0.9.8: cannot open shared object file : No such file or directory" Basically I could not locate this library in the entire system. I even tried installing the latest openssl library from www.openssl.org <http://www.openssl.org/> ., but in vain. Your help in this regard is highly appreciated. Thanks & regards Srinath

3 2

[Serusers] media and RTP -proxy
by Andrey Kouprianov 10 May '06

10 May '06

Guys, hi! Where can I download mediaproxy and RTPProxy tar balls??? I see that RTPPRoxy download from Portaone's site was discontinued? And I did not find a single link for mediaproxy either (though it should be downloadable from iptel.org, is that right?) Eagerly waiting for your reply. Anyone's reply.... Andrey.

3 5

[Users] ACK is sent before the re-INVITE to OpenSER, but the proxy relays the re-INVITE first (call flow in the body).
by Alexandre Abreu 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hello. Below it's the call flow. UAC CALL CONTROL 1 OPENSER 1 GW | | | | | INVITE F1 | | | |--------------->| | | | 100 F2 | | | |<---------------| INVITE F3 | | | |--------------->| | | | 100 F4 | | | |<---------------| INVITE F5 | | | |--------------->| | | | 183 F6 | | | 183 F7 |<---------------| | 183 F8 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | | | | Early Media | | |<==============>|<===============|================| | | | 200 F9 | | | 200 F10 |<---------------| | |<---------------| | | | | | | | ACK F13 | | | |--------------->| | | | re-INVITE F14 | | | |--------------->| | | | | re-INVITE F15 | | | |--------------->| | | | ACK F16 | | | |--------------->| | | | | | | | 500 F17 | | | | <--------------| | | | | The problem is between F13 and F16. Why OPENSER relays the re-INVITE first (F15), if the ACK (F13) was sent before and arrives before? And I am sure that this ACK hits a t_relay(), because after the re-INVITE sent, the ACK (F16) is sent normally... I am using OpenSER 1.0.1. Any help is appreciated. Alexandre

3 2

[Users] Information to learn OpenSER and SIP
by Manuel Ángel Rubio Jiménez 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi, i'd like learn more about SIP and OpenSER, but i don't found information about OpenSER with MediaProxy, how works OpenSER with RADIUS (by example) and other things. I don't like HOW-TO, i don't need know how to install anything, i need understand how works each component (openser, radius, mediaproxy...) and some about SIP and RTP. Regards. -- Manuel A. Rubio "Bombadil" Usuario de GNU/Linux #323628 acorde a http://counter.li.org/ GPG ID 1C84979D ftp://bosqueviejo.net/pub/bombadil.asc Técnico en Admin. Sistemas Informáticos

2 1

[Users] Database AVP
by Douglas Garstang 10 May '06

10 May '06

Can someone post/link to some examples of how to use avp module to write/read data to/from MySQL tables? The openser.org docs are reeeeealy bad. Doug.

3 2

[Users] more outbound proxies/openser & one register/*
by Peter Hudec 10 May '06

10 May '06

hi all, I haven't found so far any suitable solution for my problem. I want to have more outbound proxies and only one register. Outbound proxies should be also RTP proxy for clients /for all, or only behind NAT, it doesn't matter/ My idea is, that the REGISTER server see the IP of the outbound proxy, not the UA it self. Insipired by siporxd and milkfish project I wrote a patch for nathelper to rewrite the contacnat addres to IP of the proxy. If the proxy receives REGISTER, it save the contact and send new to to register with it IP. The signalinig is working good. But I have problem with RTP streams and the SDP part of the INVITE request. If you try to call between two proxies, the RTP goes PROXY1<->REGISTER<->PROXY2, instead of only between PROXY1<->PROXY2. Also if you made a call between 2 phone on the same proxy, the call passes through REGISTER ;( The example openser/nathelper configuration is working good, if the proxy is also register ;) I have atteached my own. Can anyone just a bit help me with configuration or give me a link to the another sip proxy project, which can satisfy my needs ? best regards Peter Hudec -- Things are easier than they appear; all you need is the right focus Leonardo Balliache # # $Id: nathelper.cfg,v 1.1.2.1 2003/11/24 14:47:18 janakj Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script including nathelper support # This default script includes nathelper support. To make it work # you will also have to install Maxim's RTP proxy. The proxy is enforced # if one of the parties is behind a NAT. # # If you have an endpoing in the public internet which is known to # support symmetric RTP (Cisco PSTN gateway or voicemail, for example), # then you don't have to force RTP proxy. If you don't want to enforce # RTP proxy for some destinations than simply use t_relay() instead of # route(1) # # Sections marked with !! Nathelper contain modifications for nathelper # # NOTE !! This config is EXPERIMENTAL ! # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=no check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/openser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/openser/lib/openser/modules/mysql.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("registrar", "sip_natping_flag", 7) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:127.0.0.1:22222") modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@voip.swan.sk") modparam("nathelper", "sipping_method", "OPTIONS") # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); return(0); }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); return(0); }; if (method=="REGISTER") { if (uri==myself) { sl_send_reply("403", "This is PROXY, you can't register here!"); return(0); } else { if (nat_uac_test("3")) { setflag(6); fix_nated_register(); } setflag(7); force_rport(); save_noreply("location"); fix_nated_contact("62.152.225.27"); route(1); } return(0); } if (nat_uac_test("3")) { if (uri==myself) { if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); return(0); } } else { if (!lookup("location")) { fix_nated_contact("62.152.225.27"); if (method=="INVITE") { setflag(5); force_rtp_proxy(); } } else { fix_nated_contact("62.152.225.27"); if (method=="INVITE") { setflag(5); force_rtp_proxy(); } } force_rport(); t_on_reply("1"); } } else { if (uri==myself) { if (lookup("location")) { if (method=="INVITE") { setflag(5); force_rtp_proxy(); } force_rport(); t_on_reply("1"); } else { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); return(0); } } } route(1); return(0); } route[1] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; return(0); } onreply_route[1] { if (nat_uac_test("3")) { fix_nated_contact("62.152.225.27"); if (isflagset(5) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { force_rtp_proxy(); } } else { if (isflagset(5) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { force_rtp_proxy(); } } force_rport(); }

2 2

[Users] Problem with RPID
by Bogomolov Andrei 10 May '06

10 May '06

I use radius authorize reply to set AVP rpid value: 0(30405) DEBUG:auth_radius:radius_authorize_sterman: Success 0(30405) DEBUG:auth_radius:generate_avps: getting SIP AVPs from avpair 225 0(30405) DEBUG:auth_radius:extract_avp: string is <rpid:9284444> 0(30405) DEBUG:auth_radius:extract_avp: AVP name is <rpid> 0(30405) DEBUG:auth_radius:extract_avp: AVP val is <9284444> 0(30405) DEBUG:auth_radius:generate_avps: AVP 'rpid'/0='9284444'/0 has been added But when this caller is invating, openser writes to log: 0(30405) append_rpid_hf: No rpid AVP The question is: where are SIP-AVPs stored? Do I have to load auth_db in openser.cfg? Or avps could be stored in RAM without mysql database?

2 1

[Users] asterisk and openser - CallerID
by Paul Cupis 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hi all, I'm having some trouble integrating openser with asterisk. I am able to make/receive calls PSTN<>asterisk<>OpenSER<>SIP-client fine, and the SIP client received the PSTN callers CallerID, but I cannot get the SIP-originated call to present a useful CLI to the PSTN recipient. FWIW, I have been able to set the CallerID manually from AGI scripts and the like, and it works from IAX<>asterisk<>PSTN. In openser.cfg I have: # Append Remote-Party-ID header field xlog( "L_INFO", "appending rpid" ); append_rpid_hf("", ";party=calling;id-type=subscriber;screen=no"); and I can see the RPID header in the SIP traffic. In sip.conf I have: [openser] type=friend context=from-openser host=<hidden> insecure=very trustrpid=yes amaflags=billing We are using asterisk 1.0.7 atm and openser 1.0.1 with MySQL backend. I've tried setting the rpid field in openser.subscriber to various settings but it is not making it to the PSTN recipient. Any ideas/gotchas with this sort of setup, or any further information required?

2 3

[Users] Overwrite "From:" HF
by Bogomolov Andrei 10 May '06

10 May '06

Is it possible to overwrite "From:" HF on Invitation depending on RPID AVP? Our VOIP gateway does not support Remote-Party-ID header field.

2 1

[Serusers] help me in serweb
by ravi reddy 10 May '06

10 May '06

Hello All, I have been trying to run this serweb since 4 days but i am getting different errors and i follwed so many e-mails from our community but still it doesnt work Iam using fedora 4 and ser 0.9.6 and i want to install serweb as followed by the docs but iam getting some errors like favicon.ico file missing some thing and i keep changing all the settings and at last now iam totally confused i installed my serweb in directory /var/www/ and in serweb there is one html directory and i moved it to the directory /var/www/html as told in the docs sip.aarnet.edu But when i typed this url:http://192.168.0.76/serweb Iam getting all list of directories and when i typed http://192.168.0.76/serweb/admin/index.php no message nothing a white blank page bullshit i dont understand what is happening here i changed my settings in /etc/httpd.conf ,and /etc/php.ini but,no use can any body please help me to get out of this work and to move forward thanks in advance :-) regards, Ravi.

1 0

[Users] Overwrite "From:" header
by Bogomolov Andrei 10 May '06

10 May '06

Is it possible to overwrite "From:" header on Invitation depending on RPID AVP?

1 0

[Serusers] SER Proxy not authenticating
by Stephen Helfen 10 May '06

10 May '06

I have several sip proxies running ser in the same network. The most recent proxy I have brought up is not authenticating requests, but rather forwarding them off to another proxy in the nextwork. The new proxy is essentially doing nothing more than passing messages back and forth between the UA and the other proxy when it should be able to handle the call itself. Any idea what I could be missing here?

2 1

RE: [Serusers] ser.cfg children=
by Gould, Aaron 09 May '06

09 May '06

thanks evan. could i do this ...? 'listen=tls:eth0' thanks aaron ________________________________ From: Evan Borgström [mailto:evan.borgstrom@ca.mci.com] Sent: Tue 5/9/2006 12:51 PM To: Gould, Aaron Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser.cfg children= There are plenty of legitimate uses for having SER listen on a loopback address. I have one server that runs two instances of SER, one for SIP messaging and the other as a SIMPLE<->XMPP (jabber) gateway. They communicate over the loopback interface. To turn off different interfaces just modify your listen statements. For instance if you only want things to listen on eth0 add 'listen=eth0' to your global statements. If you want just UDP on eth0 use 'listen=udp:eth0'. FWIW, a good rule of thumb is to run services blacklist centric (ie. deny everything by default and then allow only the things you want) so the more specific your listen statements are the easier it is to anticipate the traffic you will receive. -Evan Gould, Aaron wrote: > why is there 4 of each? is there a legitimate need for the loopbacks? also, may i turn off the 4 udp and leave only the 4 tcp? if so how please. and furthermore, i beleive tls is security over tcp , if so, how may i turn on tls ? > > thanks > aaron > > > ________________________________ > > From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org on behalf of Andrey Kouprianov > Sent: Tue 5/9/2006 3:36 AM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser.cfg children= > > > > There was a privious post on this exactly like yours. Anyway... > > "children=4" mean that there will be 4 UDP, 4 TCP and 4 loopback > listenters on your SER, when you start it (you can check with "serctl > ps" to verify). > > On 5/9/06, Giuseppe Parlato <gparlato(a)tnet.it> wrote: >> Hi >> in ser.cfg what does #children=4 means.. I've been looking in many >> configurations file but there is no explenation >> >> Giuseppe >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

Re: [Users] ACK is sent before the re-INVITE to OpenSER, but
by Gene Willingham 09 May '06

09 May '06

I too am having this problem. Are the reinvites being generated by Asterisk? I have a test environment where making adding two lines of code to asterisk will help the issue. My only concern is whether the code change creates a performance issue. I tried asking the question the asterisk-dev list, but did not get a response. My solution was to insert a usleep(20000) between the ack and the reinvite. This delays the reinvite by 20 ms. The concern I had was is Asterisk fully threaded or does the 20 ms delay delay all processing of sip requests. Gene

1 0

[Users] openser on host without public IP
by j.obi＠troja.net 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi Is it possible to use openser on a host without a public IP address? I have a router by my internet provider for the SDSL connection and behind that a wrt54g with openwrt on it. That works as Firewall and I want to use it as sip proxy now too. My Question is now, are there any possibilities to use openser with stun or something similiar to work around the problem with the IP address? Bye Jens

3 2

RE: [Serusers] ser.cfg children=
by Gould, Aaron 09 May '06

09 May '06

why is there 4 of each? is there a legitimate need for the loopbacks? also, may i turn off the 4 udp and leave only the 4 tcp? if so how please. and furthermore, i beleive tls is security over tcp , if so, how may i turn on tls ? thanks aaron ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org on behalf of Andrey Kouprianov Sent: Tue 5/9/2006 3:36 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser.cfg children= There was a privious post on this exactly like yours. Anyway... "children=4" mean that there will be 4 UDP, 4 TCP and 4 loopback listenters on your SER, when you start it (you can check with "serctl ps" to verify). On 5/9/06, Giuseppe Parlato <gparlato(a)tnet.it> wrote: > > Hi > in ser.cfg what does #children=4 means.. I've been looking in many > configurations file but there is no explenation > > Giuseppe > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

3 2

[Serusers] Q:About:Accounting
by Alejandro Sanchez 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hello, Thank you ever so much, your suggestions really worked!. The error not longer is displayed however the accounting information is not being shown yet, it displays the message: No calls. The DB does have information about accounting of users. Thus we had habilitated the log option, we did some debuging and found that the reason why it is not displaying any information is because the sql query (in method.get_acc_entires.php) does not match with the information in the DB, especificaly in the where section of sql query the domain field doesn't match. The application is expecting to find in domain field of the "acc table" the IP where SER is running but the DB has in domain field the IP of the caller. Why SER is storing the IP of the caller's PC in the domain field? is this correct? if so, why the query is expecting the SER IP in that field instead? How can we fix this? Thank you in advance Best regards, Alex ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB extra a tu correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx

1 0

[Users] 408 error
by unplug 09 May '06

09 May '06

In what case the server will issue 408 error. An user can make call without problem. He also can receive call but the call will be dropped automatically around 50 seconds. From the log below, a 408 request timeout (line682) is created and then the call is dropped. http://fisher.no-ip.com/ngrep/ngrep6667871.log >From the document, the server will create 408 when it can't produce a response before a given time out. But in this case, I don't know why it creates such error only for this user and not for other user. Could anyone can tell me why the server create such error message? Thanks!

2 1

[Users] Help in Freeradius and openser
by raviprakash sunkara 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi to all, I tried to insert the users for testing the server, but small error arrived. That is . a) radiusd.conf[1840] unknown Auth-Type "digest" in authenticate section. b) radclient: Failed to send packet for ID 162: Unknown attribute "NAS-IP-Address" c) radtest test test 192.168.2.55 1812 radiustest Sending Access-Request of id 215 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" User-Password = "test" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 Re-sending Access-Request of id 215 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" User-Password = "test" NAS-IP-Address = 255.255.255.255 Please help me in a,b and c issues. what are these issues. Please help me -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) Hyperion Technology www.hyperion-tech.com

2 1

[Users] NEW MODULE : dialog support
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, the devel version includes a new module for providing dialog support. For more about it, please see: http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/dialog.html Currently the module offers only call tracking functionality. In the future, new functionalities as dialog termination, per dialog flags and AVPs will be added. These will make possible implementation of more complex dialog-based features (like location hiding). regards, bogdan

4 4

[Serusers] No Voice Link between PBX..PLz help
by fay butt 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, I am new user in SER, i am stuck on one problem. When I make a call from a Client connected with SER to Asterisk(PBX) client, it works fine. But,when i make's a call between 2 different PBX ,it rings and connects but there is no voice between these two PBX clients.. In SER.cfg,I am just forwarding the call)..If anybody have idea,how to solve it, Plz helppppppppppppppp me.. if (!lookup("location")) { if (!src_ip==10.19.200.81) { if (uri =~"^sip:4[0-9]*@") { forward ( 10.19.200.73 , 5060 ); break; } } else if (uri =~"^sip:2[0-9]*@") { forward ( 10.19.200.84 , 5060 ); break; } else { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; }; Thanks in advance. --------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail goes everywhere you do. Get it on your phone.

1 0

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, Thanks for your reply. Dump is catched on the same machine that runs SER. If no response is seen on the tcpdump trace than the packet is not created or sent (I guess) But I don't have any idea why... Btw, I installed Ser again from CVS and setup 2 new accounts. Then tried to add the accounts to the contact list of eachother (again) No authorization message is received by the other client. I still get the same error messages in Ser log. I am using Fedora 5 linux, if that helps. I believe there is a problem with xcap authorization (or sending the watcherinfo notification). Also , I really suspect my SER configuration. Could you have a look at it if I send it to you ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Vaclav Kubart Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:54 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, my response was this (sent to serusers mailing list): I don't see any responses to presence messages (SUBSCRIBE, PUBLISH) in the ngrep dump but in the log they are. Does this mean, that the dump is catched on another machine than the log? Vaclav On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:37:03PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > My intension is not to disturb you, but I didn't receive a reply from you for the following email. > Di you receive it ? > > Have a nice day, > ilker > > > ________________________________ > > From: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:20 PM > To: 'Vaclav Kubart' > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > Hi Vaclav, > > I've run with no NAT; ngrep output and ser log with debug=4 is attached. > You can see that Ser server can ping the contact address at the end of the ngrep output. > In the debug log I filtered the process ID 2905 for you. I hope it helps to figure out where the problem is. > > Btw, xcap root does not have any index file. Eyebeam client does not receive xcap authorization request. > Presentity is not shown also. > > Online IM messages are working but offline messages don't reach user (maybe it's related). > > Today I returned back to the eyebeam 1.1 release and results are the same. > > Thanks, > ilker > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:02 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Hi, > run it without NAT and debug=4 and send me ngrep dump again. In the log try to find debug messages containing next hop address like: > > May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: DEBUG:tm:t_uac: > next_hop=<sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp> > May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free(0x8120e80, > 0x81703b0), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(409) May 2 > 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19886]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 32) > called from data_lump.c: insert_cond_lump_after(216) May 2 13:19:51 > sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19888]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 8) returns > address 0x81706b8 frag. 0x81706a0 (size=8) on 1 -th hit May 2 > 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May > 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found > May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free: freeing > frag. 0x8170398 alloc'ed from data_lump.c: insert_new_lump_before(140) > > In this sample is next_hop = > sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp. The number of process has to be the same as in consequent error message "t_uac: socket not found". It is the number in [ ] - in this case 19887. > > The address there has to be accessible from machine with SER (try to ping the IP). > > The index file is not needed. > > And are watchers authorized? (Do they see status of presentity?) > > Vaclav > > > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:52:39PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > I still couldn't succeed in presence over SER. > > Still getting following messages, no matter if I'm behid NAT or not. > > I tested on LAN many times but I still get same error messages. > > > > Btw, there is no index file in my xcap-root directory. Should I have something there ? > > I didn't receive any xcap authorization request after changing xcap > > authorization root to real hostname instead of 127.0.0.1 > > > > May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no socket > > found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no > > socket found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 > > 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: notify.c:398: > > Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 sesapp > > /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 4 > > 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify > > returned > > -7 > > > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:50 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > Try to use nathelper module. I'm not familiar with it but there exists some documentation for it (in modules/nathelper/README). > > > > Vaclav > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > > > The ngrep.out file was from Friday. And I realized that I'd changed Eyebeam client configuration after Friday. > > > Now it sends internal IP as contact. (as in the attached > > > ngrep2.out > > > file) > > > > > > Now I don't know how to change the contact as public IP. But > > > presencce messages were not working Friday also > > > > > > Any idea how to change the contact as public IP ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:56 PM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > > 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be > > > > that the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? > > > > > > It seems so. > > > > > > > On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. > > > > > > > > Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it > > > > be because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address > > > > ?) > > > > > > SER tries to connect to IP address which is not accessible for it. And it tries again and again... > > > > > > But I don't know how this IP address got to presence SER, because there was 85.xxx.xxx.xxx in Contact in SUBSCRIBE request in the network dump. > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM > > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > > > I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. > > > > > > > > But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? > > > > > > > > If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. > > > > > > > > Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. > > > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > > > > > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > > > > > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/030A0701/07004E0D/090B4C > 06/90204252.jpg> > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor > olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. > This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. > ______________________________________________________________________ > ______________________________________________________________________ > _ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0B0A0505/0D044507/09034E02/282…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 2

[Serusers] Serweb mail problem
by Gokay Tosunoglu 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi all, In my freebsd 6.0 system, serweb registration page does not send mail and returns error. I can send mail manually by terminal, no problem with it. How can i see a log file or something like that to see why it happens? Or any idea for solution? Thanks, Gokay

1 0

[Serusers] SER, Eyebeam, and Via header
by Alistair Cunningham 09 May '06

09 May '06

On SER 0.9.6, we get the following logged when a user with an X-Ten Eyebeam softphone tries to register (IP addresses have been changed): May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: parse_via: invalid via - end of header in state 6 May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: parse_via on: <SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:46230;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-0a622369247b7c31- > ntent-Length: 0am AudioOnly release 3014w stamp 26704, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: parse_via parse error, parsed so far:<SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:46230;branch=z9hG4bK-d > 43-0a622369247b7c31-1--d87543-; May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: get_hdr_field: bad via > ntent-Length: 0am AudioOnly release 3014w stamp 26704, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO7543-;P/2.0 May 8 17:31:18 test ser[8877]: ERROR: receive_msg: parse_msg failed An ngrep trace shows: Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:35955;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-2667f342e0038805-1--d87543-;. Has anyone seen this before? Is there a change for either SER or Eyebeam to make them work together? -- Alistair Cunningham, Integrics Ltd, +44 (0)7870 699 479 http://integrics.com/

2 2

[Serusers] Failed to mount...
by fay butt 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi everyone, I have problem in mounting, I get this messege but i am unable to understand,what is the meaning of mounting. Can anybody help me solving this problem. May 9 13:37:20 localhost automount[10353]: failed to mount /misc/.directory May 9 13:37:20 localhost automount[10354]: >> /usr/sbin/showmount: can't get address for .directory May 9 13:37:20 localhost automount[10354]: lookup(program): lookup for .directory failed May 9 13:37:20 localhost automount[10354]: failed to mount /net/.directory Thanks in advance, Faisal --------------------------------- Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.

1 0

[Serusers] postgres
by Mário Ferreira 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, I have a problem when i try to setup the postgres for the ser: register_udomain(): Invalid table version I checked out from cvs and the database creation script for postgres didn't have the INSERTs for table version. Another checkout I made maybe 3 weeks ago, contained these INSERTs but the same error ocurred. What is missing to use postgres with the cvs version? Regards, Mário Ferreira

1 0

[Serusers] ser.cfg children=
by Giuseppe Parlato 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi in ser.cfg what does #children=4 means.. I've been looking in many configurations file but there is no explenation Giuseppe

2 1

[Users] logging voip calls
by Giuseppe Parlato 09 May '06

09 May '06

is it possible to check how long was a VoIP call, directly through ser or some ser tool? thanks Giuseppe

4 3

[Serusers] append_branch: max nr of branches exceeded
by Giuseppe Parlato 09 May '06

09 May '06

I get the following error sometimes.. May 4 11:53:35 dns2 ser[28473]: ERROR: append_branch: max nr of branches exceeded May 4 11:53:35 dns2 ser[28473]: lookup(): Error while appending a branch I read it was because the destination set has to be increased. I have to check configur.h file but where is it? I can't find it. I only found in ser.cfg childre=4 Giuseppe

2 3

[Serusers] checking how long a voip call was
by Giuseppe Parlato 09 May '06

09 May '06

is it possible to check how long was a VoIP call, through ser or some ser tool? I have a custiomer he thinks the call he made was shorter then the one I billed thanks Giuseppe

1 0

[Users] different QoS tagging for voice and video RTP
by Rodney G. McDuff 09 May '06

09 May '06

I would like to tag my voice and video RTP with different QoS. If I'm using SER/OpenSER I can QoS tag RTP thru either the mediaproxy or rtpproxy. But that seem to currently tag both voice and video RTP with the same QoS. I can use iptables (on linux) to also tag a particular UDP port range with a particular DSCP value but again it seems difficult to differentiate voice and video RTP unless one tries to allocate voice RTP to one UDP range and video to another. Has anyone got any idea on how to achieve this? -- Dr. Rodney G. McDuff |Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam Manager, Strategic Technologies Group| Ex luce ad tenebras Information Technology Services | The University of Queensland | EMAIL: mcduff(a)its.uq.edu.au | TELEPHONE: +61 7 3365 8220 |

2 1

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi Vaclav, My intension is not to disturb you, but I didn't receive a reply from you for the following email. Di you receive it ? Have a nice day, ilker ________________________________ From: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:20 PM To: 'Vaclav Kubart' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi Vaclav, I've run with no NAT; ngrep output and ser log with debug=4 is attached. You can see that Ser server can ping the contact address at the end of the ngrep output. In the debug log I filtered the process ID 2905 for you. I hope it helps to figure out where the problem is. Btw, xcap root does not have any index file. Eyebeam client does not receive xcap authorization request. Presentity is not shown also. Online IM messages are working but offline messages don't reach user (maybe it's related). Today I returned back to the eyebeam 1.1 release and results are the same. Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:02 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, run it without NAT and debug=4 and send me ngrep dump again. In the log try to find debug messages containing next hop address like: May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: DEBUG:tm:t_uac: next_hop=<sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp> May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free(0x8120e80, 0x81703b0), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(409) May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19886]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 32) called from data_lump.c: insert_cond_lump_after(216) May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19888]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 8) returns address 0x81706b8 frag. 0x81706a0 (size=8) on 1 -th hit May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free: freeing frag. 0x8170398 alloc'ed from data_lump.c: insert_new_lump_before(140) In this sample is next_hop = sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp. The number of process has to be the same as in consequent error message "t_uac: socket not found". It is the number in [ ] - in this case 19887. The address there has to be accessible from machine with SER (try to ping the IP). The index file is not needed. And are watchers authorized? (Do they see status of presentity?) Vaclav On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:52:39PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > I still couldn't succeed in presence over SER. > Still getting following messages, no matter if I'm behid NAT or not. > I tested on LAN many times but I still get same error messages. > > Btw, there is no index file in my xcap-root directory. Should I have something there ? > I didn't receive any xcap authorization request after changing xcap > authorization root to real hostname instead of 127.0.0.1 > > May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no socket > found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no > socket found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 > sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send > watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 sesapp > /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 4 > 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned > -7 > > > Thanks, > ilker > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:50 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Try to use nathelper module. I'm not familiar with it but there exists some documentation for it (in modules/nathelper/README). > > Vaclav > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > The ngrep.out file was from Friday. And I realized that I'd changed Eyebeam client configuration after Friday. > > Now it sends internal IP as contact. (as in the attached ngrep2.out > > file) > > > > Now I don't know how to change the contact as public IP. But > > presencce messages were not working Friday also > > > > Any idea how to change the contact as public IP ? > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:56 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be > > > that the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? > > > > It seems so. > > > > > On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. > > > > > > Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it be > > > because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address ?) > > > > SER tries to connect to IP address which is not accessible for it. And it tries again and again... > > > > But I don't know how this IP address got to presence SER, because there was 85.xxx.xxx.xxx in Contact in SUBSCRIBE request in the network dump. > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. > > > > > > But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? > > > > > > If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. > > > > > > Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > > > > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > > > > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > ilker > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/030A0701/07004E0D/090B4C06/902…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, I've checked the error messages again and the following error message indicates that watcherinfo notification can't be sent with reason -7 Then I looked at the notify.c in pa module. -7 is returned if there is a problem while adding headers. I'm not sure what headers are being added but maybe this could be a clue to fix the problem. there is an if block from notify.c below... Any idea ? ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) ##### FROM notify.c : if (create_headers(_w, &headers, &content_type) < 0) { LOG(L_ERR, "send_presence_notify(): Error while adding headers\n"); str_free_content(&doc); str_free_content(&content_type); return -7; } Thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 12:37 PM To: Vaclav Kubart Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi Vaclav, My intension is not to disturb you, but I didn't receive a reply from you for the following email. Di you receive it ? Have a nice day, ilker ________________________________ From: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:20 PM To: 'Vaclav Kubart' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi Vaclav, I've run with no NAT; ngrep output and ser log with debug=4 is attached. You can see that Ser server can ping the contact address at the end of the ngrep output. In the debug log I filtered the process ID 2905 for you. I hope it helps to figure out where the problem is. Btw, xcap root does not have any index file. Eyebeam client does not receive xcap authorization request. Presentity is not shown also. Online IM messages are working but offline messages don't reach user (maybe it's related). Today I returned back to the eyebeam 1.1 release and results are the same. Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:02 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, run it without NAT and debug=4 and send me ngrep dump again. In the log try to find debug messages containing next hop address like: May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: DEBUG:tm:t_uac: next_hop=<sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp> May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free(0x8120e80, 0x81703b0), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(409) May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19886]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 32) called from data_lump.c: insert_cond_lump_after(216) May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19888]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 8) returns address 0x81706b8 frag. 0x81706a0 (size=8) on 1 -th hit May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free: freeing frag. 0x8170398 alloc'ed from data_lump.c: insert_new_lump_before(140) In this sample is next_hop = sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp. The number of process has to be the same as in consequent error message "t_uac: socket not found". It is the number in [ ] - in this case 19887. The address there has to be accessible from machine with SER (try to ping the IP). The index file is not needed. And are watchers authorized? (Do they see status of presentity?) Vaclav On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:52:39PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > I still couldn't succeed in presence over SER. > Still getting following messages, no matter if I'm behid NAT or not. > I tested on LAN many times but I still get same error messages. > > Btw, there is no index file in my xcap-root directory. Should I have something there ? > I didn't receive any xcap authorization request after changing xcap > authorization root to real hostname instead of 127.0.0.1 > > May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no socket > found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no > socket found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 > sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send > watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 sesapp > /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 4 > 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned > -7 > > > Thanks, > ilker > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:50 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Try to use nathelper module. I'm not familiar with it but there exists some documentation for it (in modules/nathelper/README). > > Vaclav > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > The ngrep.out file was from Friday. And I realized that I'd changed Eyebeam client configuration after Friday. > > Now it sends internal IP as contact. (as in the attached ngrep2.out > > file) > > > > Now I don't know how to change the contact as public IP. But > > presencce messages were not working Friday also > > > > Any idea how to change the contact as public IP ? > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:56 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be > > > that the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? > > > > It seems so. > > > > > On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. > > > > > > Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it be > > > because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address ?) > > > > SER tries to connect to IP address which is not accessible for it. And it tries again and again... > > > > But I don't know how this IP address got to presence SER, because there was 85.xxx.xxx.xxx in Contact in SUBSCRIBE request in the network dump. > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/07090503/04034D04/04034E04/141…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Serusers] NAT Traversal using nathelper module
by Kostas Marneris 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hello all, I'm trying to find a solution to overcome the NAT issue using only the nathelper module. (I've already successfully worked with 'STUN' & 'MediaProxy' solutions but I'm trying also this). 1. OUTBOUND direction: --- INVITE handler --- ... # NAT Traversal mechanism for INVITEs if (nat_uac_test("19")) { setflag(7); force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); fix_nated_sdp("3"); }; # ... The solution above works fine for OUTBOUND calls, either on-net (a) or off-net (b). (For off-net calls I use a Cisco GW). a/ SIP_UA_behind_NAT -------- SER ------- SIP_UA_on_public_IP b/ SIP_UA_behind_NAT -------- SER ------- Cisco_PSTN_GW ------- PSTN 2. INBOUND direction: route[1] { # Default Message Handler t_on_reply("1"); if (!t_relay()) { log(1, " - Cannot RELAY !!!"); sl_reply_error(); }; } onreply_route[1] { if (nat_uac_test("19")) { log(1, " - Response behind NAT..."); setflag(7); force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); fix_nated_sdp("3"); }; } Although I have two-way audio between calling and called parties, I get the following logging mesgs : May 3 17:22:26 server ./ser[13705]: ERROR: extract_body: message body has length zero May 3 17:22:26 server ./ser[13705]: ERROR: fix_nated_sdp: cannot extract body from msg! May 3 17:22:26 server ./ser[13705]: ERROR: on_reply processing failed My question is : Is the above the correct way for NAT traversal of SIP Responses (200 OK) ? Do I have to add something else somewhere in ser.cfg ? Any idea on the log mesgs above ? thanks in advance for any help, Kostas

4 9

[Serusers] SER and XCAP Server
by Miguel Freitas 09 May '06

09 May '06

Still having some issues when trying to simulate a XCAP server with SER and eyeBeam softphone. I'm using presence snapshot «ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4» with the ser.cfgprovided (some changes to adapt to my domain) When I start SER I always get this warning: WARNING: xl_mod_init: DIFFERENT hostname 'xxxxx' and gethostbyname 'localhost.localdomain' Can't find any thread about this, don't think it is crucial... I added the domain and users to SER's DB using serctl. When I start eyeBeam, it registers fine on SER. (SER log: MSILO: offline messages for sip:xxx@xxxxxx dumped) But if I have configured XCAP on Server-side Storage (and Presence Mode disabled) eyeBeam sends a «SUBSCRIBE sip:4004» to SER with header «Event: sip-profile;profile-type=application;app-id=resource-lists» which SER responds with «Status: 489 Unsupported event package». SER log: check_message(): Unsupported event package ERROR: subscribe.c:856: Error while checking message ERROR: subscribe.c:942: handle_subscription about to send_reply and return -2 ---- Then I configured the Presence Mode as Presence Agent and registered two eyeBeam clients, sip:4002 and sip:4004. User sip:4002 has sip:4004 on his buddy list and sip:4004 has allowed sip:4002 to watch his presence status. REGISTER is OK for both. SER log: MSILO: offline messages for sip:xxx@xxxxxx dumped dumping stored winfo to sip:xxx@xxxxxx sip:4002 sends «SUBSCRIBE sip:4002» (Event: presence.winfo) and SER respond with 200 OK. But then sip:4002 keeps sending reliable «SUBSCRIBE sip:4004» (Event: presence) and «PUBLISH sip:4002» (Event: presence) and SER only responds after aprox. 60 seconds with 202 Accepted to «SUBSCRIBE sip:4004» and 200 OK to «PUBLISH sip:4002». Client sip:4002 also receives from SER a «NOTIFY sip:4002» (From: <sip:4004>, To: <sip:4002>, Event: presence, Subscription-State: pending;expires=xxx) which sip:4002 responds with «Status: 481 Call/transaction Dos Not Exist» I think SER is experiencing some kind of lock/delay when it receives SUBSCRIBE (Event: presence.winfo) from more than one client. SER log: MSILO: offline messages for sip:4002@xxxxxx dumped Warning: run_failure_handlers: no UAC support (0,0) MSILO: offline messages for sip:4004@xxxxxx dumped After some time, SER sends again to sip:4002 a «NOTIFY sip:4002» (From: <sip:4004>, To: <sip:4002>, Event: presence) but this time with header Subscription-State: terminated;reason=timeout, which sip:4002 responds with «Status: 481 Call/transaction Dos Not Exist» (SER log: Warning: run>failure_handlers: no UAC support (0,0) ) The SUBSCRIBE (Event: presence.winfo) keeps being renewed... When I change presence status on sip:4002, it sends «PUBLISH sip:4002» (Content-Type: application/pidf+xml; Event: presence) which SER responds with 200 OK. SER log: MSILO: offline messages for sip:4002@xxxxx dumped I'm lost here. Server-side Storage with XCAP works fine for presence-rules and resource-lists but the presence agent don't. I will run some more tests but this time with SER not saving offline messages.

2 1

[Serusers] unable to start SER
by ram 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi I have installed 0.9.6 on my FC5 Server iam able to compile there is no errors when i try to start SER ERROR; bad config file ( 6 errors) iam getting this errors in message May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: set_mod_param_regex: parameter <db_url> not found in module <uri> May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: parse error (69,4-5): Can't set module parameter May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: set_mod_param_regex: parameter <db_flag> not found in module <acc> May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: parse error (89,20-21): Can't set module parameter May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: set_mod_param_regex: parameter <db_missed_flag> not found in module <acc> May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: parse error (90,20-21): Can't set module parameter May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: parse error (119,14-21): syntax error May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: parse error (119,22-23): bad arguments May 7 20:35:05 crm ser: parse error (413,24-25): unknown command, missing loadmodule? any help will be great ram

3 10

[Users] getting started with mediaproxy
by B Boc 09 May '06

09 May '06

hi, I have used the SER "getting started" document and the quick start script packaged in openser 1.0.1 to make my way thru authenticating a pair of UAs and having them call each other. I am now reading the "Handling NAT" section with the goal of using mediaproxy to do the far-end NAT traversal. Question: Is there a pre-made openser.cfg script using mediaproxy to do far-end NAT traversal available for 1.0.1 If not does the one in the SER "getting started" document work on Openser 1.0.1?? tnx

2 2

[Users] mediaproxy error (SDP message)
by unplug 09 May '06

09 May '06

Hi, Recently, I noticed there is an error from the log for a particular user. May 8 12:34:08 o01 /usr/local/sbin/openser[25451]: error: mediaproxy/getSDPMessage(): SDP message has zero length May 8 12:34:08 o01 /usr/local/sbin/openser[25451]: error: use_media_proxy(): failed to get the SDP message It seems that mediaproxy can't get the SDP message and the user failed to make/receive call in such error occurred. As the user is using ipphone behine NAT, I wonder if it is related to the router problem. Any suggestion for this error? unplug

1 0

[Users] openser and ADSL
by buxalex＠libero.it 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hello to everybody, I have openser 1.1 installed on a machine which has an ADSL internet connection. My question is: as the ip address is a public IP (80.xxxx...), do I need any module for nat tunneling? (mediaproxy or nathelper...) I mean, if all the UAs are connected to internet via ADSL (different providers), do I need to set NAT modules? Thanks Alex

5 4

[Serusers] MySQL question
by Darko 08 May '06

08 May '06

Just need confirmation for my thoughts and start digging into C code. Is there some other option to reuse existing MySQL database with usernames/passwords of my users - mysql module doesn't have any export functions and extcmd seems to be abandoned. Darko

1 0

[Users] Regarding on Freeradius in openser.
by raviprakash sunkara 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hello Everybody, I'm new to openser and also to freeradius. 1)how to insert the users in freeradius server 2) When I test with radiusd - X its show somes errors . The errors are mention below /usr/local/etc/raddb/users[64]: Unexpected trailing comma in check item list for entry test Errors reading /usr/local/etc/raddb/users radiusd.conf[1047]: files: Module instantiation failed. radiusd.conf[1791] Unknown module "files". radiusd.conf[1727] Failed to parse authorize section. 3) And also when tested the clients , by using "radclient -f digest localhost auth <shared_secret>" . It shows the following error radclient : no respones from server ID 134 4) And also when I tried with " radtest test test 192.168.2.55 5060 hyperion" its shows me below one Sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" Re-sending Access-Request of id 233 to 192.168.2.55 port 1812 User-Name = "test" radclient: no response from server for ID 233 5) when i also tried with "ps -aux | grep radiusd " it show a warning and errors Warning: bad syntax, perhaps a bogus '-'? See /usr/share/doc/procps-3.2.3 /FAQ root 13093 0.0 0.1 4276 696 pts/4 S+ 16:41 0:00 grep radiusd Please help me in 5 issues which are mention above. -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) Hyperion Technology www.hyperion-tech.com

2 1

[Users] Event: keep-alive
by Papadopoulos Georgios 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hello, Certain user agents send a NOTIFY message with the header Event: keep-alive Our server responds with a 501 Not Implemented message. Does anyone know if this is correct behaviour? Should it respond with a 200 Ok in order for the user agent to work? I am assuming that any response should be enough to keep the NAT binding alive, but maybe I am wrong. thank you for any help. George Papadopoulos Disclaimer The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

3 2

RE: [Users] Event: keep-alive
by Papadopoulos Georgios 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hello Juha, By server I mean our OpenSer. In our config we have else if (method=="NOTIFY" | method=="PUBLISH") { sl_send_reply("501", "Not Implemented"); return; } My question is whether this is correct according to your experience. Should we check for the "Event: keep-alive" header and send a 200 Ok in that case? Should the answer make a difference to the user agent? Is there a draft that defines what the response should be for NOTIFY messages depending on the "Event:" header? Thank you George > -----Original Message----- > From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh@tutpro.com] > Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:58 PM > To: Papadopoulos Georgios > Cc: users(a)openser.org > Subject: [Users] Event: keep-alive > > Papadopoulos Georgios writes: > > > Certain user agents send a NOTIFY message with the header > > Event: keep-alive > Our server responds with a 501 Not > Implemented message. > > what is "server". if your proxy, are you sure that 501 comes > because of Event header and not because of NOTIFY message? > > -- juha > Disclaimer The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorized to, and must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

2 1

[Serusers] Call logs
by Steve Morard 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hi all ! I would like to make some call logs and I wondered it there was a way to record the messages that SER sends back to the users like "move permanently" in order to log forwarded call and blocking calls. Thank you a lot Best Regards Steve

2 1

[Users] new feature: manage avp flags from script
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hello, a new feature that allow to manage the AVP flags was committed in the development repository. Till now, the AVP flags were hidden to the configuration file, being available only inside the C code. The AVP flags available to configuration file are 8bit long. They are not stored to database or radius, they are used only while the AVP last in memory. The main purpose of the flags is to be able to mark some AVPs for special processing or meaning. One (very requested) example is to group avps per caller or callee. Same named AVP may be required to be loaded for both callee and caller. The previous option was to load one set, rename it and then load the second. Witht he new feature, one can load first set and mark it with a special flag and the second with another flag. avp_db_load("$ruri","$avp(i1:123)"); # - callee's avps avp_db_load("$ruri","$avp(i2:123)"); # - caller's avps If the script flags are missing, then all avps are matched, regardless the script flags set (full compatibility with the old format). All avpops functions were upgraded to handle the flags. Any feedback is appreciated, mainly the testing. For more details, see the readme file of the avpops module. http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/avpops.html Please pay attention that the avp naming format has changed, most of the functions' parameters being affected,. A new section in the readme has been introduced, read it carefully. http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.1.x/avpops.html#AEN56 Cheers, Daniel

1 0

[Serusers] small mediapoxy question
by Andrey Kouprianov 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hi, Small question.. What does "error: use_media_proxy(): empty response from mediaproxy" normally mean? Thanx in advance, Andrey.

1 0

[Users] How to change default db passwords
by Steve Blair 08 May '06

08 May '06

I just started with openser and I'd like to change the default rw and ro passwords for mysql. I didn't see a way to search all past posts to this list for this answer. Is it possible to make this change? If so can someone describe how it is done ? Thanks.

2 1

[Users] Regarding with openser and RADIUS ..
by raviprakash sunkara 08 May '06

08 May '06

Hello Everybody, GoodMorning everybody, I install openser and softphone into my Box and i make a calls kool and fine.... I have some queries about the RADIUS. The queries are 1) What is RADIUS.. Why we need it and... 2) How TO coneect RADIUS in openser. 3) Is it need to install the Radius in My Box.. 4) What are the Modules to connect the openser... 5) Any Examples with openSER and RADIUS. Please help Me in this Regarding..... Please excuse in my English... Cheers...And With Regards, -- Sunkara Ravi Prakash ( Voip Developer) ravi.sunkara(a)hyperion-tech.com Hyperion Technologies. www.hyperion-tech.com

3 2

[Serusers] how to make ser route media steam, and record CDR
by hlzhangxt 07 May '06

07 May '06

how to make ser route media steam, and record CDR?

2 1

[Users] lcr module stops rolling over...
by Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya 06 May '06

06 May '06

As the subject sez., rollovers just stop working. Detailed scenario - We use the lcr module for outbound calls through our (multiple) gateway providers. For various reasons, the providers frequently reject the call, and we roll the call over to the next provider (next_gw(), etc., etc.) The lcr module, however, stop rolling the calls over after a couple of thousand rejections. As best as I can tell, next_gw() fails, and the rejection just gets passed back to the CPE. Any ideas? Is there some sort of counter? Some sort of memory limit that we are running into? For what it is worth, we process a couple of thousand calls an hour, and the box that OpenSER is running on is a dual Opteron with 3GB, etc., etc. Cheers p.s. One additional factoid. We log to acc/mysql, and query the acc table to get CDRs. The query runs once every 30 seconds or so. We can't turn this off for any extended period, but have done so once next_gw() starts failing. It doesn't seem to make a difference.

2 4

[Serusers] SER 0.9.6 missing modules
by Steve Helfen 06 May '06

06 May '06

I am attempting to upgrade SER from 0.8.12 to 0.9.6, but am having some problems with the new modules. The base ser.cfg file for 0.9.6 calls the following loadmodules: # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulesmysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulessl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulestm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulesrr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulesmaxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulesusrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulesregistrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulestextops.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulesauth.so" #loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modulesauth_db.so" Unfortunately, when I install the ser and ser-mysql modules in FC4, I don't get any of these modules. Am I missing something obvious here? In addition, does anyone have information regarding the compatibility of the following applications: SER 0.8.12 and MySQL 5.0.21 SER 0.9.6 and MySQL 4.1.1 Thanks in advance. ------------------ Stephen Helfen Software Engineer nexVortex, Inc. (703)579-0205 460 Herndon Parkway Suite 250 Herndon, VA 20170 Email: steve.helfen(a)nexvortex.com Web: www.nexvortex.com

2 1

[Serusers] Accept incoming requests ( required ports )
by Iraklis Zografos 06 May '06

06 May '06

I have succesfully installed SER 0.9.6 on my slackware 10.2 linux box. I can connect from my internal network but when i try to connect from an outside internet ip address something is blocking it. I have a speedtouch 530 router for a ADSL connection I have unbind and route requests to my ser server ( port 5060 ) but still nothing Any Ideas ? -- Iraklis Zografos CTI & VOIP Consultant Mobile: 6979074031 Internet Phone (iptel.org): 8002848496 Email: iraklis.zografos(a)gmail.com Athens,Greece

1 0

[Users] problem with exec_dset
by openser user 06 May '06

06 May '06

hi all, i am trying to send $tU in exec_dset function. my function look like this exec_dset("fwdnoanswer1.sh '$tU'"); in this function my script fwdnoanswer1.sh will take $tU as an input and check my database to get the forward number and it has to dail out to fwd number. when i runned script manually it was giving proper result. but when i used this script in exec_dset i am not getting fwd number. can any one please help me how to use this exec_dset() function. according to me the script is not taking that value $tU. with regards openseruser --------------------------------- Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new. Click here

2 1

[Users] extra accounting problem
by Klaus Darilion 05 May '06

05 May '06

Hi! I want to extra-account several parameters like source IP address:port, received socket, TLS parameters for the incoming connection AND the outgoing connection. The incoming connection is simple. I just copy the pseudo variables into the AVPs which are extra accountend. For accounting the outgoing parameters, I abuse the response. In the default response route I copy the socket info and TLS parameters into other AVPs (which are also marked for extra accounting). The AVPs which are filled during the request are stored in the database. But the AVPs which are filled in the response do not get filled into the DB. Is there a limitation within the ACC module? regards klaus

3 2

[Users] subst problem
by Jeff Williams 05 May '06

05 May '06

When subtituting a whole line like: subst('/^To:.*$/To: fred/'); It appears that the line gets terminated using only a "\n" rather than a "\r\n". This causes problems with some clients. Jeff

2 1

Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by Vaclav Kubart 05 May '06

05 May '06

Hi, I don't see any responses to presence messages (SUBSCRIBE, PUBLISH) in the ngrep dump but in the log they are. Does this mean, that the dump is catched on another machine than the log? Vaclav On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:19:44PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > I've run with no NAT; ngrep output and ser log with debug=4 is attached. > You can see that Ser server can ping the contact address at the end of the ngrep output. > In the debug log I filtered the process ID 2905 for you. I hope it helps to figure out where the problem is. > > Btw, xcap root does not have any index file. Eyebeam client does not receive xcap authorization request. > Presentity is not shown also. > > Online IM messages are working but offline messages don't reach user (maybe it's related). > > Today I returned back to the eyebeam 1.1 release and results are the same. > > Thanks, > ilker > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:02 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Hi, > run it without NAT and debug=4 and send me ngrep dump again. In the log try to find debug messages containing next hop address like: > > May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: DEBUG:tm:t_uac: next_hop=<sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp> > May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free(0x8120e80, 0x81703b0), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(409) May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19886]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 32) called from data_lump.c: insert_cond_lump_after(216) May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19888]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 8) returns address 0x81706b8 frag. 0x81706a0 (size=8) on 1 -th hit May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free: freeing frag. 0x8170398 alloc'ed from data_lump.c: insert_new_lump_before(140) > > In this sample is next_hop = > sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp. The number of process has to be the same as in consequent error message "t_uac: socket not found". It is the number in [ ] - in this case 19887. > > The address there has to be accessible from machine with SER (try to ping the IP). > > The index file is not needed. > > And are watchers authorized? (Do they see status of presentity?) > > Vaclav > > > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:52:39PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > I still couldn't succeed in presence over SER. > > Still getting following messages, no matter if I'm behid NAT or not. > > I tested on LAN many times but I still get same error messages. > > > > Btw, there is no index file in my xcap-root directory. Should I have something there ? > > I didn't receive any xcap authorization request after changing xcap > > authorization root to real hostname instead of 127.0.0.1 > > > > May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no socket > > found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no > > socket found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 > > sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send > > watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 sesapp > > /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 4 > > 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned > > -7 > > > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:50 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > Try to use nathelper module. I'm not familiar with it but there exists some documentation for it (in modules/nathelper/README). > > > > Vaclav > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > > > The ngrep.out file was from Friday. And I realized that I'd changed Eyebeam client configuration after Friday. > > > Now it sends internal IP as contact. (as in the attached ngrep2.out > > > file) > > > > > > Now I don't know how to change the contact as public IP. But > > > presencce messages were not working Friday also > > > > > > Any idea how to change the contact as public IP ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:56 PM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > > 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be > > > > that the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? > > > > > > It seems so. > > > > > > > On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. > > > > > > > > Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it be > > > > because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address ?) > > > > > > SER tries to connect to IP address which is not accessible for it. And it tries again and again... > > > > > > But I don't know how this IP address got to presence SER, because there was 85.xxx.xxx.xxx in Contact in SUBSCRIBE request in the network dump. > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM > > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > > > I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. > > > > > > > > But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? > > > > > > > > If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. > > > > > > > > Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. > > > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > > > > > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > > > > > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/020B0501/07014802/05044E06/613…> > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. > This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Content-Description: ngrepout3.txt > U 193.243.202.99:5061 -> 193.243.202.97:5060 > REGISTER sip:sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=4759a713. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 193.243.202.99:5061;branch=z9hG4bK749f.40170f85.0. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-df12471a4e5f1a2b-1--d87543-;rport=8880. > Call-ID: b64d280a55422d2e@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 2 REGISTER. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880;rinstance=8575ae137220a8b9>. > Max-Forwards: 16. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Supported: eventlist. > Authorization: Digest username="200000900568888885",realm="NcxSip",nonce="83164818",uri="sip:sip.koc.net",response="fea7ddcca157c0fa74fa0cb3a094067f",algorithm=MD5. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 193.243.202.97:5060 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SIP/2.0 200 Ok. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 193.243.202.99:5061;branch=z9hG4bK749f.40170f85.0. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-df12471a4e5f1a2b-1--d87543-;rport=8880. > Call-ID: b64d280a55422d2e@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 2 REGISTER. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=4759a713. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>;expires=3600. > To: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > REGISTER sip:sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=4759a713. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-df12471a4e5f1a2b-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: b64d280a55422d2e@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 2 REGISTER. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880;rinstance=8575ae137220a8b9>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Supported: eventlist. > Authorization: Digest username="200000900568888885",realm="NcxSip",nonce="83164818",uri="sip:sip.koc.net",response="fea7ddcca157c0fa74fa0cb3a094067f",algorithm=MD5. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 193.243.202.99:5061 -> 195.87.232.68:8880 > SIP/2.0 200 Ok. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-df12471a4e5f1a2b-1--d87543-;rport=8880. > Call-ID: b64d280a55422d2e@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 2 REGISTER. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=4759a713. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>;expires=3600. > To: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > PUBLISH sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=7e396f37. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-175df70fb0273c1c-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 8643f82913481a09@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 PUBLISH. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > Content-Type: application/pidf+xml. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence. > Content-Length: 571. > . > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" > xmlns:pp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:person" > xmlns:et="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-tuple" > xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-person" > xmlns:es="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:status:rpid-status" > xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" > entity="sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net"> > <tuple id="b139ca52"> > <contact priority="1">sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net</contact> > <status> > <basic>open</basic> > </status> > </tuple> > </presence> > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=301c5c35. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-e00e4a3569597f58-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 74315518e845221f@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: application/watcherinfo+xml. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence.winfo. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888884@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888884@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=f4338c5a. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-0f40e5365951cc32-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 3047f617e019ee63@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: multipart/related, application/rlmi+xml, application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=9860186d. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-9947134ba036d770-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 2a31106bd3720a31@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: message/external-body. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: sip-profile;profile-type=application;app-id=resource-lists. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > PUBLISH sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=7e396f37. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-175df70fb0273c1c-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 8643f82913481a09@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 PUBLISH. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > Content-Type: application/pidf+xml. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence. > Content-Length: 571. > . > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" > xmlns:pp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:person" > xmlns:et="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-tuple" > xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-person" > xmlns:es="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:status:rpid-status" > xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" > entity="sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net"> > <tuple id="b139ca52"> > <contact priority="1">sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net</contact> > <status> > <basic>open</basic> > </status> > </tuple> > </presence> > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=301c5c35. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-e00e4a3569597f58-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 74315518e845221f@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: application/watcherinfo+xml. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence.winfo. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888884@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888884@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=f4338c5a. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-0f40e5365951cc32-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 3047f617e019ee63@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: multipart/related, application/rlmi+xml, application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=9860186d. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-9947134ba036d770-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 2a31106bd3720a31@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: message/external-body. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: sip-profile;profile-type=application;app-id=resource-lists. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > PUBLISH sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=7e396f37. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-175df70fb0273c1c-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 8643f82913481a09@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 PUBLISH. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > Content-Type: application/pidf+xml. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence. > Content-Length: 571. > . > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" > xmlns:pp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:person" > xmlns:et="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-tuple" > xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-person" > xmlns:es="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:status:rpid-status" > xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" > entity="sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net"> > <tuple id="b139ca52"> > <contact priority="1">sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net</contact> > <status> > <basic>open</basic> > </status> > </tuple> > </presence> > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=301c5c35. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-e00e4a3569597f58-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 74315518e845221f@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: application/watcherinfo+xml. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence.winfo. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888884@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888884@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=f4338c5a. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-0f40e5365951cc32-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 3047f617e019ee63@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: multipart/related, application/rlmi+xml, application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=9860186d. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-9947134ba036d770-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 2a31106bd3720a31@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: message/external-body. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: sip-profile;profile-type=application;app-id=resource-lists. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 193.243.202.99:5061 -> 195.87.232.68:8880 > SIP/2.0 200 Ok. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-df12471a4e5f1a2b-1--d87543-;rport=8880. > Call-ID: b64d280a55422d2e@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 2 REGISTER. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=4759a713. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>;expires=3600. > To: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 193.243.202.99:5061 -> 195.87.232.68:8880 > SIP/2.0 200 Ok. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-df12471a4e5f1a2b-1--d87543-;rport=8880. > Call-ID: b64d280a55422d2e@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 2 REGISTER. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=4759a713. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>;expires=3600. > To: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > PUBLISH sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=7e396f37. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-175df70fb0273c1c-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 8643f82913481a09@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 PUBLISH. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > Content-Type: application/pidf+xml. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence. > Content-Length: 571. > . > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" > xmlns:pp="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:person" > xmlns:et="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-tuple" > xmlns:ep="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:rpid-person" > xmlns:es="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid:status:rpid-status" > xmlns:ci="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" > entity="sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net"> > <tuple id="b139ca52"> > <contact priority="1">sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net</contact> > <status> > <basic>open</basic> > </status> > </tuple> > </presence> > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=301c5c35. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-e00e4a3569597f58-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 74315518e845221f@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: application/watcherinfo+xml. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence.winfo. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888884@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888884@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=f4338c5a. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-0f40e5365951cc32-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 3047f617e019ee63@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: multipart/related, application/rlmi+xml, application/pidf+xml, application/xpidf+xml. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: presence. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > # > U 195.87.232.68:8880 -> 193.243.202.99:5061 > SUBSCRIBE sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net SIP/2.0. > To: <sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>. > From: "200000900568888885"<sip:200000900568888885@sip.koc.net>;tag=9860186d. > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 195.87.232.68:8880;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-9947134ba036d770-1--d87543-;rport. > Call-ID: 2a31106bd3720a31@aWxrZXJhLmtvY25ldC5sb2NhbA... > CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE. > Contact: <sip:200000900568888885@195.87.232.68:8880>. > Max-Forwards: 70. > Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. > User-Agent: eyeBeam release 3015c stamp 28601. > Expires: 3600. > Accept: message/external-body. > Supported: eventlist. > Event: sip-profile;profile-type=application;app-id=resource-lists. > Content-Length: 0. > . > > exit > 102 received, 0 dropped > [root@sesapp ~]# > [root@sesapp ~]# > [root@sesapp ~]# ping 195.87.232.68 > PING 195.87.232.68 (195.87.232.68) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 195.87.232.68: icmp_seq=1 ttl=125 time=3.56 ms > 64 bytes from 195.87.232.68: icmp_seq=2 ttl=125 time=3.59 ms > 64 bytes from 195.87.232.68: icmp_seq=3 ttl=125 time=2.12 ms > > --- 195.87.232.68 ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.124/3.093/3.596/0.687 ms > [root@sesapp ~]#

1 0

[Users] Re: lcr module stops rolling over - Resolved. Connection leak?
by Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya 05 May '06

05 May '06

I had a problem earlier where the lcr module would stop rolling over (i.e., next_gw() was not returning the next gateway, even though there *were* valid gateways to return). During debugging and burrowing around, I serendipitously discovered that my 'missed_calls' table did not have the same schema as the acc table (i had added new columns to the acc table, but not to the missed_calls table). Well, I made the schemae of the two tables identical, and that seems to have cleared up the lcr problem - i.e., the the calls roll over perfectly now. So, do you think there is some kind of connection leak? Maybe when/where it tries to write to the missed_calls table (and fails, repeatedly), it is clobbering something? Just FYI...

1 0

[Serusers] Aliase problem
by fay butt 05 May '06

05 May '06

Hi everyone, I have a problem with aliases, when i try to create a aliase by SERCTL command : /usr/sbin/serctl alias add 5000 sip:faisal@10.19.200.67 it gives the error like this " 400 Table 'aliases' not found in memory, use save("aliases") or lookup("aliases") in the configuration script first " Can anybody help me how to solve this issue Thanks in advance, Faisal --------------------------------- Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

1 0

[Serusers] Some Question related to SER
by ram 05 May '06

05 May '06

Hi Iam working with SER Proxy to install between my voIP provider and my users I got some DID from VoIP provider He routed to my Server iam able to make calls and receive calls using serweb, iam able to see only out going call records but i have problems below 1. i dont see missed calls list 2. i dont see incoming number and Minutes 3. is there anything i can do with Voice message instead of sending email Like Asterix, Voice number dial and retrive voice message 4. how can i check the how many users are logged in in my server 5. how do i debug if some customer complaint certain time call quality not good is there any tools to measure this kind of problems ram

1 0

[Serusers] ser version
by Giuseppe Parlato 05 May '06

05 May '06

Hello, how can I find out what ser version is installed? I've been searching for a while but I coudn't find it. Giuseppe

2 4

[Serusers] Q:ABOUT:SerWeb "table CDR not found"
by Alejandro Sanchez 05 May '06

05 May '06

Hello! anyboby knows if the CDR table must be created manually because the table is not in the script of the SER 0.9.6 and when i try to access to accounting page sends a database error saying that the table dose not exists. Thank's for the help. ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? La mejor conexión a Internet y 2GB extra a tu correo por $100 al mes. http://net.yahoo.com.mx

2 1

[Users] ERROR: append_branch: max nr of branches exceeded
by Giuseppe Parlato 04 May '06

04 May '06

I get the following error sometimes.. May 4 11:53:35 dns2 ser[28473]: ERROR: append_branch: max nr of branches exceeded May 4 11:53:35 dns2 ser[28473]: lookup(): Error while appending a branch I read it was because the destination set has to be increased. I have to check configur.h file but where is it? I can't find it. I only found in ser.cfg childre=4 Giuseppe

4 8

[Serusers] Capture REDIRECT and BLOCK messages
by Steve Morard 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi ! I'm wondering if there is a way to capture the REDIRECT messages and BLOCK messages created by SER ( we are using CPL to make decisions when an INVITE arrives ) and to store them in a database. Thank you Regards Steve

1 0

RE: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi, Thanks for your reply but this is totally a different case. In my case the problem is not CANCEL messages but BYE and ACK messages. BYE message (and also ACK) is sent to the contact of the RTP stream instead of the SER proxy. But I want these messages to be sent to SER. That's why I should somehow make them to be sent to SER. So It should be done by either recording route or changing contact header. How can I do that ? Thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of fay butt Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 7:08 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages hi, i had that problem a time ago. I just put this messege and now it's working fine. if (method == "CANCEL" ) { if (uri =~"^sip:4[0-9]*@localhost") { forward ( asterisk , 5060 ); t_relay(); break; }; }; "Ýlker Aktuna (Koç.net)" <ilkera(a)koc.net> wrote: Hi, For voice communication I use a SIP+RTP proxy together with SER. For PSTN calls SER routes the INVITE messages to the RTP proxy. Everything works fine there, but when the call is ended by one client (which is connected to SER) or the PSTN user, the BYE message does not arrive to SER. If our RTP proxy does not see the message coming from SER, call doesn't end. That's why I need all of the BYE messages to go through SER. How can I do that ? In the default configuration there is a record route process for every message other than REGISTER. But still BYE and ACK messages are not sent to SER. Should I change the contact header of the messages arriving from RTP proxy ? If so, how can I do it ? What does following configuration block do ? if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; Thanks, ilker _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers ________________________________ How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates. <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail_us/taglines/postman8/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/ev…> <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/02090504/06074F06/04084E03/211…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

[Users] limiting number of calls per user
by Jayesh Nambiar 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi, I was tring to limit the number of simultaneous calls a single user can recieve in openser. I am planning to keep a column in preferences table where his max number of calls will be mentioned and as and when an Invite goes to his uri, the value will be decremented and the value will be incremented again when the bye is received for that particular call. If the value becomes '0' he can receive no more calls. But there is also a possible issue where in if a bye is not received for any particular call due to any reason, the call would be on forever and his max_calls value will not be incremented again. First of all, can this idea be implemented using avps efficiently and what would be the overhead?? If it can be implemented, how can we overcome the issue of missing byes..... Can someone already tried this feature help me or guide me to go ahead with this idea. thanks.... jayesh. --------------------------------- Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new. Click here

2 1

[Serusers] ReINVITE logging query
by sip 04 May '06

04 May '06

So... currently, we use a query modified from the one provided by the ever helpful Olivier Taylor to get CDR-like call-log info from SER's acc: SELECT t1.from_uri as Caller, t1.to_uri as Callee, TIMEDIFF(t2.time, t1.time) as Duration, t1.time as CallDate FROM acc t1, acc t2 WHERE t1.sip_callid=t2.sip_callid AND ((t1.fromtag=t2.fromtag AND t1.totag=t2.totag) OR (t1.fromtag=t2.totag AND t1.totag=t2.fromtag)) AND t1.sip_method='INVITE' AND t2.sip_method='BYE' AND t1.from_uri='<username>' ORDER BY t1.time DESC; It works really well with one glaring problem.... reINVITES get logged as separate calls. We see a lot of these going through FWD and our PSTN stuff and several other providers we peer with, and it becomes weird. For instance, a normal call... userA --> proxy --> userB Works really well UNLESS there's a reINVITE from userB to userA for a direct path. In that case, for a 10-second call, we get call logs that looks like: Outgoing: uriA | uriB | 00:10 | 2006-04-04 13:34:48 Incoming: uriB | uriA | 00:10 | 2006-04-04 13:34:48 The same call is logged twice as it logs both the INVITE outgoing and the incoming reINVITE. Can anyone think of a query that would strip the reINVITEs? Or are we likely going to have to do something programatically to get rid of these? Thanks, N.

1 0

[Serusers] How to use record route to change path of BYE messages
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi, For voice communication I use a SIP+RTP proxy together with SER. For PSTN calls SER routes the INVITE messages to the RTP proxy. Everything works fine there, but when the call is ended by one client (which is connected to SER) or the PSTN user, the BYE message does not arrive to SER. If our RTP proxy does not see the message coming from SER, call doesn't end. That's why I need all of the BYE messages to go through SER. How can I do that ? In the default configuration there is a record route process for every message other than REGISTER. But still BYE and ACK messages are not sent to SER. Should I change the contact header of the messages arriving from RTP proxy ? If so, how can I do it ? What does following configuration block do ? if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; Thanks, ilker <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0B0A0505/07074505/0D014E02/182…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Users] extra accounting and exported pseudo variables
by Klaus Darilion 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi! I'm trying to extra account exported pseudo variables. should this work? modparam("acc", "db_extra", "source_ip=$si;source_port=$sp;received_ip=$Ri;received_port=$Rp;tls_peer_subject=$tls_peer_subject"); nomal logging is fine: xlog("L_INFO","[$Tf] $$tls_peer_subject = '$tls_peer_subject'\n"); results in: [Wed May 3 16:11:52 2006] $tls_peer_subject = '/C=at/ST=Vienna/L=Vienna/O=itsp2/CN=itsp2.labs.nic.at But the accounting fails: ERROR:acc:extra2strar: failed to get 'tls_peer_subject' Is there a known problem? Is it because when the accounting is done, there is no more TLS connection available to retrieve the cert parameters? Meanwhile I will try the workaround with copying to AVPs and accounting of the AVPs. regards klaus

2 6

[Serusers] ser and History-Info (RFC 4244) for VM/UM application
by john hess 04 May '06

04 May '06

hi, does anyone have experience in using ser in processing call-forwarding/redirection signaled in the History-Info section (as per RFC 4244)? the application context is ser as a means to interpolate signaling between an IP PBX and a SIP-speaking VM/UM platform (I3 Communite -- v2.3.1). the problem i am trying to solve (at least in the near-term) is that the PBX is using History-Info to signal call-forwarding events (ex: CFNA, CFB) while Communite is expecting call-forwarding to be signaled via Diversion. until the platforms support have a call-forwarding signaling method in common, i would like to be able to insert ser into the signaling path -- more or less as a translator between the two platforms. tia, john john hess <jhess(a)berkeley.edu> nocman ist, uc berkeley 510 643-6401

1 0

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi Vaclav, The following message bounced from the mailing list. Please confirm if you received it. Thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 4:20 PM To: 'Vaclav Kubart' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi Vaclav, I've run with no NAT; ngrep output and ser log with debug=4 is attached. You can see that Ser server can ping the contact address at the end of the ngrep output. In the debug log I filtered the process ID 2905 for you. I hope it helps to figure out where the problem is. Btw, xcap root does not have any index file. Eyebeam client does not receive xcap authorization request. Presentity is not shown also. Online IM messages are working but offline messages don't reach user (maybe it's related). Today I returned back to the eyebeam 1.1 release and results are the same. Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:02 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, run it without NAT and debug=4 and send me ngrep dump again. In the log try to find debug messages containing next hop address like: May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: DEBUG:tm:t_uac: next_hop=<sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp> May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free(0x8120e80, 0x81703b0), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(409) May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19886]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 32) called from data_lump.c: insert_cond_lump_after(216) May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19888]: qm_malloc(0x8120e80, 8) returns address 0x81706b8 frag. 0x81706a0 (size=8) on 1 -th hit May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19887]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 13:19:51 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19885]: qm_free: freeing frag. 0x8170398 alloc'ed from data_lump.c: insert_new_lump_before(140) In this sample is next_hop = sip:200000900568888888@192.168.2.17:26548;transport=udp. The number of process has to be the same as in consequent error message "t_uac: socket not found". It is the number in [ ] - in this case 19887. The address there has to be accessible from machine with SER (try to ping the IP). The index file is not needed. And are watchers authorized? (Do they see status of presentity?) Vaclav On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 02:52:39PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > I still couldn't succeed in presence over SER. > Still getting following messages, no matter if I'm behid NAT or not. > I tested on LAN many times but I still get same error messages. > > Btw, there is no index file in my xcap-root directory. Should I have something there ? > I didn't receive any xcap authorization request after changing xcap > authorization root to real hostname instead of 127.0.0.1 > > May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no socket > found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no > socket found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 > sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send > watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 sesapp > /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 4 > 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned > -7 > > > Thanks, > ilker > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:50 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Try to use nathelper module. I'm not familiar with it but there exists some documentation for it (in modules/nathelper/README). > > Vaclav > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > The ngrep.out file was from Friday. And I realized that I'd changed Eyebeam client configuration after Friday. > > Now it sends internal IP as contact. (as in the attached ngrep2.out > > file) > > > > Now I don't know how to change the contact as public IP. But > > presencce messages were not working Friday also > > > > Any idea how to change the contact as public IP ? > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:56 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be > > > that the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? > > > > It seems so. > > > > > On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. > > > > > > Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it be > > > because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address ?) > > > > SER tries to connect to IP address which is not accessible for it. And it tries again and again... > > > > But I don't know how this IP address got to presence SER, because there was 85.xxx.xxx.xxx in Contact in SUBSCRIBE request in the network dump. > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. > > > > > > But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? > > > > > > If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. > > > > > > Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > > > > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > > > > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > ilker > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/020A0707/07044906/050B4C00/212…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

[Serusers] SER pa and XCAP server
by Miguel Freitas 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi all I'm trying to get a SER with pa, rls and mysql modules to test it as a XCAP server, along with Apache2 webserver and eyeBeam softphone... At start, I ran into lots of info how to do it, and the presence handbook seamed to be a good way to start. I came across http://download.dns-hosting.info/XCAP/ which could get me where I wanted (but there's no reference to which version of SER used). But it was only the beginning of a long and hard struggle! I downloaded the sources ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4 from http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/presence/ but I didn't manage to install it, later I realized that maybe I shouldn't be using the gcc 4. So I moved on to the debian packages, but there isn't a release of the rls module! So I moved on to the sources of the latest release, ser-0.9.6. Still no rls module, I got it from ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4. But it has been a nightmare to config the ser.cfg because the module pa doesn't support some of the functions described on the presence handbook.. I abandoned ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4 because, among other things, the tool serctl was working with the older version of the SER database (trying to add new users to ser.subscriber instead of ser.credentials) I could use some pin-points to where I should go now, if stick with ser-0.9.6 or move again to ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4 since it should be more what I'm looking for. Thanks for any help ubuntu 5.10 gcc 3.4.5 MySQL 4.1.12 (libmysqlclient14-dev) Apache 2.0.54 (libapache2-mod-suphp, libapache2-mod-php4, php4-pear, php4-cgi)

2 3

[Serusers] ENUM support
by jayasree palapati 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi, I'll sign for the useraccount in iptel.org web server and get an user account thru which i can work with any other softphones like x-lite and all.Can u please tell me if i register the ser web server with E.164 number whther it gets registered or not and whther iptel.org online proxy supports ENUM naptr records or not. Regards, Jayasree The information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in this e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail immediately and permanently delete the message and any attachments.

4 4

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi Vaclav, I still couldn't succeed in presence over SER. Still getting following messages, no matter if I'm behid NAT or not. I tested on LAN many times but I still get same error messages. Btw, there is no index file in my xcap-root directory. Should I have something there ? I didn't receive any xcap authorization request after changing xcap authorization root to real hostname instead of 127.0.0.1 May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no socket found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: t_uac: no socket found May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 4 14:42:27 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19996]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 5:50 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Try to use nathelper module. I'm not familiar with it but there exists some documentation for it (in modules/nathelper/README). Vaclav On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > The ngrep.out file was from Friday. And I realized that I'd changed Eyebeam client configuration after Friday. > Now it sends internal IP as contact. (as in the attached ngrep2.out > file) > > Now I don't know how to change the contact as public IP. But presencce > messages were not working Friday also > > Any idea how to change the contact as public IP ? > > Thanks, > ilker > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:56 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be that > > the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? > > It seems so. > > > On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. > > > > Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it be > > because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address ?) > > SER tries to connect to IP address which is not accessible for it. And it tries again and again... > > But I don't know how this IP address got to presence SER, because there was 85.xxx.xxx.xxx in Contact in SUBSCRIBE request in the network dump. > > Vaclav > > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. > > > > But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? > > > > If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. > > > > Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. > > > > Vaclav > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > > > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > > > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)? > > > Vaclav > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed. > > > > Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > ilker > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0A0B0504/0C074C0D/0D074E03/993…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Users] Re: Regarding with openser and RADIUS ..
by Klaus Darilion 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi! Please always Cc: to the list. There are several Radius servers you can use, e.g. Radiator or FreeRadius. Probably there are many more but I've never used them. regards klaus raviprakash sunkara wrote: > Hello Klaus , > > Thanks for replying and Giving the imformation about RADIUS... > > One small question. > my box is Linux..In linux wherer is Radius Server. > how to configure it and is it need to install radius server from > http://www.preradius.org > > Thanks and Regards. > sunkara Ravi prakash > Hyperion Technology. > > On 5/3/06, *Klaus Darilion* < klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at > <mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at>> wrote: > > raviprakash sunkara wrote: > > > > Hello Everybody, > > > > GoodMorning everybody, > > > > I install openser and softphone into my Box and i make a > calls kool and > > fine.... > > > > I have some queries about the RADIUS. > > > > The queries are > > > > 1) What is RADIUS.. Why we need it and... > > Radius can be used as authentication mechanism. The user data (login + > password) are stored in the Radius server and openser asks the Radius > server for verification. Thus, verification of credentials is done > inside the Radius server. > > The other alternative is to use a database backend (subscriber table) > and openser authenicates against the credentials stored in the > subscriber table. Thus, verification of credentials is done inside > openser. > > > 2) How TO coneect RADIUS in openser. > > use the auth_radius module (or the other radius modules if you need more > features) > > > 3) Is it need to install the Radius in My Box.. > > No. Usually the Radius server is on another PC. > > > 4) What are the Modules to connect the openser... > > > > 5) Any Examples with openSER and RADIUS. > > If you do not know what Radius is and if you do not havfe the explicit > requirement to use Radius, then do not use it and use auth_db instead > (storing the user data in a database) > > Also take a look at this thread: > http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-April/007407.html > > > regards > klaus > > > > Please help Me in this Regarding..... > > > > > > Please excuse in my English... > > > > > > Cheers...And With Regards, > > -- > > Sunkara Ravi Prakash ( Voip Developer) > > ravi.sunkara(a)hyperion-tech.com > <mailto:ravi.sunkara@hyperion-tech.com> > <mailto:ravi.sunkara@hyperion-tech.com > <mailto:ravi.sunkara@hyperion-tech.com>> > > Hyperion Technologies. > > www.hyperion-tech.com <http://www.hyperion-tech.com> > <http://www.hyperion-tech.com> > > > > > -- > Sunkara Ravi Prakash

1 0

[Serusers] Modifying "From" header field of an INVITE message
by scm-j＠nuntius.com 04 May '06

04 May '06

I am relatively new to SER. My SIP service provider requires me to present the ANI in the "From" field in my INVITE message header in E.164 format. I am currently sending this information as follows: From: "2125551212" <sip:2125551212@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx> They want it in E.164 format as follows: From: "+12125551212" <sip:+12125551212@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx> I see function only to modify the SIP URI but not the other header or SDP fields. Could someone help me with a code snippet that I can use in ser.cfg to do this conversion? Regards, SCM

7 8

[Serusers] acc_db_request
by Steve Morard 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi ! I'm currently using the function acc_db_request() like this acc_db_request("whatever","acc"). I would like to know if it is possible to use the satus as a parameter like this : acc_db_request (status,"acc"). I tried and it is not working, is there another way to do that ? Thank you Regards Steve

1 0

[Serusers] SERWEB configuration...
by fay butt 04 May '06

04 May '06

Hi everyone, I am in deep trouble of SERWEB path configuration. Can any body tell me how to configure the SERWEB and where i have to install it..my apache is installed at /usr/local/apache/ , I am working on Fedorea Core 4... Plz,help me how to configure it, I have problem in path accessing... thanks in advance Faisal --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC-to-Phone calls for ridiculously low rates.

2 3

[Serusers] Routing issues with SER
by Douglas Siqueira 04 May '06

04 May '06

I'm having issues with routing in my SER. Does anybody have a sample ser.cfgfile to share with me to start testing inside my machine first ? Please, see the error message bellow: db1:/etc# sipsak -U -I -e 5 -s sip:doug@db1.net:5060 -vv registering user doug0... received: SIP/2.0 483 Too Many Hops Via: SIP/2.0/UDP localhost.localdomain:32859;received=127.0.0.1;rport=32859 From: sip:doug0@db1.net:5060;tag=22aab1db To: sip:doug0@db1.net:5060;tag=b27e1a1d33761e85846fc98f5f3a7e58.5645 Call-ID: 581611995(a)localhost.localdomain CSeq: 1 REGISTER Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.6 (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 127.0.0.1:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=6637 req_src_ip= 127.0.0.1 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:db1.net:5060 out_uri=sip:db1.net:5060via_cnt==18" error: didn't received '200 OK' on register (see above). aborting db1:/etc#

2 1

[Users] Please advise a software for multipoint audio-video conferences
by Dmitry Lyubimkov 04 May '06

04 May '06

There is a task to make multipoint video (and audio as a special case) conference in a SIP-network. The SIP-network (on basis of OpenSER) works. We need the software for creation of videoconference server (MCU in terms of H.323). Hardware solutions cost too expensively We need software for the PC with general purpose OS. The platform can be anyone - Windows, Linux... We are ready to buy for reasonable money if it will work. If anybody used similar products or simply faced - advise what to look and where it is possible to buy. Dmitry

4 5

[Users] Update
by Jh 04 May '06

04 May '06

1 0

[Serusers] Forwarding source address
by Alistair Cunningham 03 May '06

03 May '06

We'd like to forward the source address that a request came from in a header, something like: X-Source-Address: 192.168.1.1 Is there a neat way to do this? An append_sourcehf( "X-Source-Address" ) would be ideal. If worst comes to worst, we can always extract it from the c= after doing fix_nated_sdp(), but we'd prefer something less ugly! -- Alistair Cunningham, Integrics Ltd, +44 (0)7870 699 479 http://integrics.com/

3 3

[Users] db_extra in acc - is order relevant
by Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya 03 May '06

03 May '06

I've added a couple of fields to the acc table (and am logging additional information to them, e.g., src_ip, some avps, etc.). Is the order of the fields in acc relevant? i.e. if the modparam statement has the fields listed in the order field1, field2, field3, do the columns need to be in the same order? I guess a bigger question is, does my adding columns to acc cause any larger compatibility issues (ignore upgrading acc for a moment. also, i know, i should have 'em in a different table, etc., etc.)??? cheers

3 5

[Serusers] compilation of ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4 with presence
by laurent schweizer 03 May '06

03 May '06

Hello, When i try to compile the presence module I have this error: Thanks Laurent [root@byll2 lib]# make -f Makefile.ser install Making install in cds make[1]: Entering directory `/home/installsrc/ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4/lib/cds' cc -shared -DNAME='"ser"' -DVERSION='"0.10.99-dev35-pa-4"' -DARCH='"x86_64"' -DOS='"linux"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 3.4.5"' -D__CPU_x86_64 -D__OS_linux -DSER_VER=10099 -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/ser/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MEM -DSHM_MMAP -DDNS_IP_HACK -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DDBG_QM_MALLOC -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DCC_GCC_LIKE_ASM -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSG_NOSIGNAL -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -DHAVE_TIMEGM -DHAVE_EPOLL -DHAVE_SIGIO_RT -DHAVE_SELECT -DSER -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall -minline-all-stringops -falign-loops -g -Wall -I/home/installsrc/ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4/lib -I/home/installsrc/ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4/lib/.. -ldl -lresolv -L/home/installsrc/ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4/lib/cds -L/home/installsrc/ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4/lib/qsa -o lib_ser_cds.so cds.o dlink.o dstring.o hash_table.o memory.o msg_queue.o ptr_vector.o ref_cntr.o serialize.o sstr.o vector.o /usr/bin/ld: cds.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC cds.o: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [lib_ser_cds.so] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/installsrc/ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4/lib/cds' make: [cds] Error 2 (ignored)

2 1

[Serusers] serweb blank page
by Mindaugas Kuprys 03 May '06

03 May '06

Hi, I have problems loading serweb admin or users page. After giving username and password I'm getting blank page. Last log in serweb log is: May 03 08:48:09 serweb [debug] User login: checking password of user with username: admin, domain: erdves.lt And I have no errors in apache-err.log even if with highest apache debug level setting. Strange is that I have yhe same situation even if i'm giving a mistaken mysql login in config_data_layer.php . Where should I search solution? Thanks in advance, Mindaugas

1 0

[Serusers] CPL
by Steve Morard 03 May '06

03 May '06

Hi ! I'm currently working on a project using the CPL module. Due to the specifications of this project, we have to find a way to access a database into the CPL scripts and to write some informations from the CPL scripts to the database (username of the caller and calle, decision made by the CPL script). Does anyone has some hints for me on how to do that. Has everyone already added this feature to the CPL module ? Thank you for your help. Regards Steve

1 0

[Serusers] problem with serweb
by Jahangir Mushtaq 03 May '06

03 May '06

Hi every one I have following problem with serweb. I changed the permission in functions.php already but even then i have this problem. Warning: fopen(/tmp/ser_fifo): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /srv/www/htdocs/serweb-0.9.4/html/functions.php on line 340 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /srv/www/htdocs/serweb-0.9.4/html/functions.php:340) in /srv/www/htdocs/serweb-0.9.4/html/page.php on line 35 Jahangir __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

[Users] Re: usrloc and cseq
by Helge Waastad 03 May '06

03 May '06

Hi, after some more thinking, I realized that I had to play with the retransmission timers and drop() statement for retransmitted messages from the UAC's. It seems that it's stable now. I have'nt really seen this problem berfore, but when I switched to RADIUS for auth......Ough. BTW, has anyone tried RADIUS auth for OpenSER with long delays? Would be interesting to have dynamic timers... br hw -- Hi, I have a Loadbalanced scenario with two servers of each (2x LB/Dispatchers and 2x Routers) Each router has its own location table. They both replicate REGISTERS (forward_tcp/save_noreply). However every now and then I get: ERROR:usrloc:update_contacts: invalid cseq for aor This happens for all contacts I do not really know why, since all the transactions seems allright to me and that it happens only now and then... Any clues to help med debug further? br hw Helge Waastad Senior Konsulent Smartnet

2 1

[Users] error loading module ?
by Giuseppe Parlato 03 May '06

03 May '06

Looking at the log file I found the following error so I had to restart sip server: May 2 12:00:45 debian kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 May 2 12:00:45 debian kernel: No ISA tormenta card found at d0000 May 2 12:00:45 debian kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Unloaded May 2 12:00:45 debian insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.20-8smp/misc/torisa.o: init_module: Input/output error May 2 12:00:45 debian insmod: Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg May 2 12:00:45 debian insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.20-8smp/misc/torisa.o: insmod char-major-196 failed Actually I don't know what Zapata Telephony Interface is, however I guess the problem is loading the torisa module ??? any help please ? Giuseppe

2 1

[Users] usrloc and cseq
by Helge Waastad 03 May '06

03 May '06

Hi, I have a Loadbalanced scenario with two servers of each (2x LB/Dispatchers and 2x Routers) Each router has its own location table. They both replicate REGISTERS (forward_tcp/save_noreply). However every now and then I get: ERROR:usrloc:update_contacts: invalid cseq for aor This happens for all contacts I do not really know why, since all the transactions seems allright to me and that it happens only now and then... Any clues to help med debug further? br hw -- Helge Waastad Senior Konsulent Smartnet

2 1

Re: 回覆: [Users] get error
by Klaus Darilion 03 May '06

03 May '06

Hi! Please always cc the list Make sure you use the same versions of the openser binaries and the openser_mysql script. use openser_mysql drop openser_mysql create watch for error mesages during creating. regards klaus Allan Chao ( 策略性新技術開發處申請 ) wrote: > Dear klaus : > thank you for your help. > You say unpdating it with the opensermysql , but I tries many times with "openser_mysql create" command. > > Allan > -----原始郵件----- > 寄件者: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at] > 寄件日期: 2006年5月3日下午 04:09 > 收件者: Allan Chao ( 策略性新技術開發處申請 ) > 副本: users(a)openser.org > 主旨: Re: [Users] get error > > The usrloc and registrar module checks the schema of the 'location' > table. This is needed because never versions of openser often needs newer version of the location (and aliases) table. > > Therefore there is a 'version' table, which tells openser the version number of the used tables. > > Thus, make sure you have the proper database table schemas. When using a never version of openser, you also have to update the table schemas. > > If this is just for a testing machine, delete the whole openser DB and create it new. If you a are updating a production system, make a backup of the DB and try to update it with the opensermysql script. If this fails, use the backuped version and update the table definitions manually. > > regards > klaus > > Allan Chao ( 策略性新技術開發處申請 ) wrote: >> Dear all: >> i got a error when starts openser >> >> 0(0) new_connection: Opening MySQL connection: >> mysql://openser:openserrw@172.17.50.128/openser >> 0(0) new_connection: Connection type is 172.17.50.128via TCP/IP >> 0(0) new_connection: Protocol version is 10 >> 0(0) new_connection: Server version is 4.0.26-log >> 0(0) usrloc:preload_udomain: Wrong version v165581944 for table >> <location>, expected v1001 >> 0(0) register_udomain(): Error while preloading domain 'location' >> 0(0) pool_remove: Removing connection from the pool >> 0(0) domain_fixup(): Error while registering domain >> ERROR: error -1 while trying to fix configuration what's problem for >> it , is any configuration error? thanks. >> >> Allan >> >> DISCLAIMER: >> This message (and any attachments) may contain information that is >> confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. >> The message is intended solely for the named addressee (or a person >> responsible for delivering it to the addressee). >> If you are not the >> intended recipient of this message, you are not authorized to read, >> print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If >> you have received this message in error, please destroy the message or >> delete it from your system immediately and notify the sender. >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> -- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)openser.org >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > DISCLAIMER: > Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.

1 0

[Serusers] How to Forward calls FROM and TO the Same CISCO GW
by Nicolas FINETIN 03 May '06

03 May '06

Hello the list, I need to understand what i m doing wrong I'm trying to set the forward calls unconditionally on the outside PSTN for example when you want to redirect you incoming call to you cell phone. It's working when I'm calling from the SIP network with my soft phone but I'm getting some issue when i 'm trying to call the mapped user's DID from the PSTN net. Here is a small call routing flow: DID--->(Dial peer 1234 POTS) CISCO GW (Dial peer 20 VOIP SIP) --> SER --> forwarding to the PSTN redirect number ---> (DP 21 VOIP SIP)CISCO 1/ When i'm calling from the SIP network the sip user's phone it works (with forward sets on SER) 2/ When i'm calling from the PSTN the DID assigned to the SIP user (without forward sets on SER) It works 3/ When i'm calling from the PSTN the DID assigned to the SIP user (with forward sets on SER) It failed Guessing that it is because the i do not know how to rewrite the sip header from contact, but not sure. Can you let me know if you have workout that call flow Thanks a lot Regards, -= Nicolas Finetin =- nfinetin(a)gmail.com +33 689 20 90 72

1 0

[Users] Proxy Authenticate error
by Jeff Williams 03 May '06

03 May '06

This may not be an openser issue, but I have Netcomm NB9W UA which does not do Proxy Authentication. This is the setup: UA (202.74.186.77) => Openser proxy (202.74.164.44) => Registrar (202.74.164.72) The UA makes a REGISTER request which gets forwarded by the proxy to the registrar. The registrar then replies with 407 Proxy Authentication Required message which gets forwarded by the proxy back to the UA. The UA then seems to ignore this and re-sends an unauthenticated REGISTER reuqest. Attached is an ethereal dump showing this behaviour. My question is, is there something that the proxy or registrar are doing incorrectly which causes the UA the not do proxy authentication? I can't see anything. Thanks, Jeff

2 1

[Serusers] PA module
by Darko 03 May '06

03 May '06

HI, I'm trying to manage presence of Win Messenger UA, but stuck at very beginning. Messenger doesn't send Expires in header and RFC3265 says it SHOULD be there, but if isn't use default value for event package (?). Ok, removed test (_m->expires==0) in function parse_hfs from subscribe.c and got response 200 OK (without Expires header and RFC says that there MUST be one), and funny NOTIFY after that. Source address of NOTIFY is from my second interface, not one that communicate with UA, but it seems that it isn't big problem. Big one is destination port which is chosen with, for me, unknown condition. So, only reply from UA computer is ICMP port unreachable. SER version is 0.9.6. BRs, Darko

3 2

[Users] get error
by Allan Chao $ 策略性新技術開發處申請 $ 03 May '06

03 May '06

Dear all: i got a error when starts openser 0(0) new_connection: Opening MySQL connection: mysql://openser:openserrw@172.17.50.128/openser 0(0) new_connection: Connection type is 172.17.50.128via TCP/IP 0(0) new_connection: Protocol version is 10 0(0) new_connection: Server version is 4.0.26-log 0(0) usrloc:preload_udomain: Wrong version v165581944 for table <location>, expected v1001 0(0) register_udomain(): Error while preloading domain 'location' 0(0) pool_remove: Removing connection from the pool 0(0) domain_fixup(): Error while registering domain ERROR: error -1 while trying to fix configuration what's problem for it , is any configuration error? thanks. Allan DISCLAIMER: Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.

2 1

[Users] get error
by Allan Chao $ 策略性新技術開發處申請 $ 03 May '06

03 May '06

Dear all : i get error for start openser 0(0)usrloc:preload_udomain: Wrong version v162901216 for table <location>, expected v1001 0(0) register_udomain(): Error while preloading domain 'location' 0(0) pool_remove: Removing connection from the pool 0(0) domain_fixup(): Error while registering domain ERROR: error -1 while trying to fix configuration so, how can i do , has any version problem for mysql ? thank you Allan DISCLAIMER: Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.

1 0

[Users] Notification
by Jh 03 May '06

03 May '06

1 0

[Serusers] SEMS Problem
by Jon Farmer 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi I am getting this error when trying to use sems (14555) ERROR: send_reply (AmSipDialog.cpp:309): AmSipDialog::reply: ser answered: 500 Reply failed (14555) ERROR: reply (AmSipDialog.cpp:245): send_reply: could not send: Ser reported an error any ideas? -- Jon Farmer Telford, Shropshire, UK

1 0

[Serusers] LCR & IP address handling 0.9.7-pre1
by Judd Bourgeois 02 May '06

02 May '06

I've got 0.9.7-pre1 running with the included LCR & mysql modules. Am I the only one who's annoyed at the handling of IP addresses in LCR? First, I don't see why gw.ip_addr has to be an int. Is a varchar column for the IP address really that much of a performance hit? Isn't there something to be said for human readable and editable tables? Second, if it has to be an unsigned int, shouldn't some attention be paid to byte order? This module appears to assume that the IP address in the table is in Intel byte order (little endian). This will break if the address is in network byte order (big endian), as it would be if, for example, the MySQL INET_ATON() function was used to convert an IP address to an int. You can verify this with "serctl fifo lcr_dump" which will call print_gws, which inexplicably does a homegrown IP address decode, instead of calling the appropriate C library functions to convert IP addresses into proper byte order.

1 0

[Users] Re: [Serusers] Not found in usrloc
by Klaus Darilion 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi Davor! Not sure what your scenario is. Usually, the voicemail id will be the "canonical" SIP URI, in my case sip:klaus.darilion@mydomain I have also aliases like sip:klaus@mydomain which maps to sip:klaus.darilion@mydomain. If you do it the same way, then the config is fine. In your case the lookup("aliases") does not hit. Usually I: - write the canonical SIP URI (after lookup("aliases") but before lookup("location") ) into an AVP - use this AVP in failure route. e.g. set the RURI to this AVP - to avoid rewriting the domain part (you will loose the domain info, bad in multi domain setups) push the URI of the voicemail server in the destination URI (avp_pushto, send to voicemal but do net rewrite the request URI) regards klaus PS: CC to the list davor jovanovic wrote: > Hi Klaus, > > first of all I want to thank you for your reply. I was on some business > trip last two weeks so I wasn't able to thank you for reply and try > "revert_uri" function. I try it today but still is the same, I keep > getting "not found in usrloc" for user that is in "location" table and > for his alias. I can call user by his username and alias so I believe > that alias is correctly added to MySQL, but can not rewrite username > with alias and forward it to PBX. > > I have put ser.cfg and debug log in attachment, and if you be so kind > when you find time to make a quick look I would be very grateful. This > ser.cfg is my testing configuration and is basic. If I need to provide > some more outputs please let me know. > > Thank you very much !!! > > > davor > > Klaus Darilion wrote: >> The second lookup does not work, as the first lookup changes the request >> URI. Try revert_uri(); in failure route, just before the lookup(). >> >> klaus >> >> >> On Fri, April 14, 2006 11:29, davor jovanovic said: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have a problem with using aliases when user doesn't answer the call >>> (408, request timeout). for this I'm using failure_route[1]. After 20sec >>> when user doesn't answer the call, call comes in failure_route and it is >>> recognizes as 408, but when I want to rewrite URI with alias "884" I get >>> "Not found in usrloc", but as you can see from the output of "serctl ul >>> show" user is in both tables (location and aliases). Can somebody help >>> because I don't know what I'm doing wrong. >>> >>> Thanks a lot >>> >>> davor >>> >>> ******************************************* >>> failure_route[1]{ >>> if(t_check_status("408")){ >>> log("LOG:entered failure route 1 on code 408\n"); >>> lookup("aliases"); >>> rewritehostport("161.53.2.235:5060"); >>> t_relay(); >>> } >>> } >>> >>> ******************************************** >>> 1(22439) ->>>>>>>>> T_code=180, new_code=408 >>> 1(22439) DEBUG: t_check: msg id=2 global id=2 T start=0x40460708 >>> 1(22439) DEBUG: t_check: T already found! >>> 1(22439) DEBUG:t_check_status: checked status is <408> >>> 1(22439) LOG:entered failure route 1 on code 408 >>> 1(22439) lookup(): 'djovanovic' Not found in usrloc >>> 1(22439) ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branched for forwarding >>> 1(22439) ERROR: w_t_relay (failure mode): forwarding failed >>> >>> ******************************************** >>> serctl ul show >>> >>> domain: 'location' >>> aor : 'djovanovic' >>> ~~~Contact(0x404604a8)~~~ >>> domain : 'location' >>> aor : 'djovanovic' >>> Contact : 'sip:djovanovic@161.53.0.77:5060' >>> Expires : 429 >>> q : >>> Call-ID : '40C79AFEA5C644ADB6FEA320F247C793(a)sipgw.srce.hr' >>> CSeq : 52664 >>> >>> >>> >>> ...Record(0x4045e238)... >>> domain: 'aliases' >>> aor : '884' >>> ~~~Contact(0x4045e298)~~~ >>> domain : 'aliases' >>> aor : '884' >>> Contact : 'sip:djovanovic@sipgw.srce.hr' >>> Expires : Permanent >>> q : 1 >>> Call-ID : >>> 'The-Answer-To-The-Ultimate-Question-Of-Life-Universe-And-Everything' >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> Serusers(a)iptel.org >>> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >>> >> >> > Hi Klaus, > > first of all I want to thank you for your reply. I was on some business > trip last two weeks so I wasn't able to thank you for reply and try > "revert_uri" function. I try it today but still is the same, I keep > getting "not found in usrloc" for user that is in "location" table and > for his alias. I can call user by his username and alias so I believe > that alias is correctly added to MySQL, but can not rewrite username > with alias and forward it to PBX. > > I have put ser.cfg and debug log in attachment, and if you be so kind > when you find time to make a quick look I would be very grateful. This > ser.cfg is my testing configuration and is basic. If I need provide some > outputs please let me know. > > Thank you very much !!! > > > davor

2 2

Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by Vaclav Kubart 02 May '06

02 May '06

Try to use nathelper module. I'm not familiar with it but there exists some documentation for it (in modules/nathelper/README). Vaclav On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 05:19:10PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > The ngrep.out file was from Friday. And I realized that I'd changed Eyebeam client configuration after Friday. > Now it sends internal IP as contact. (as in the attached ngrep2.out file) > > Now I don't know how to change the contact as public IP. But presencce messages were not working Friday also > > Any idea how to change the contact as public IP ? > > Thanks, > ilker > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:56 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be that > > the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? > > It seems so. > > > On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. > > > > Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it be > > because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address ?) > > SER tries to connect to IP address which is not accessible for it. And it tries again and again... > > But I don't know how this IP address got to presence SER, because there was 85.xxx.xxx.xxx in Contact in SUBSCRIBE request in the network dump. > > Vaclav > > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. > > > > But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? > > > > If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. > > > > Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. > > > > Vaclav > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > > > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > > > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)? > > > Vaclav > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed. > > > > Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM > > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log. > > > > > > > > If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE). > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Which level of debug should I use ? > > > > > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed) > > > > > > > > > > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice. > > > > > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/07090307/00054905/04084800/141…> > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. > This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Serusers] Rtp proxy delay
by Ivan Turcin 02 May '06

02 May '06

Does anybody has an idea where is possible to have more than one RTP proxy during session? For example if provider is using RTP proxy, and customer also uses RTP proxy because of private IP address. I am measuring RTP delay and jitter and at the moment worse case scenario that I can imagine is when 4 RTP proxies are in one session (two on both sides). Thanks -- Ivan

2 1

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi, 192.168.2.17 is a NAT client behing 85.105.102.167 Could it be that the SER is sending the messages to the internal IP address of my Eyebeam client ? On eyebeam 1.5 I use the "use rport" option of the client if that matters. Any idea why I get so many "no socket found" errors ? (might it be because ser is trying to connect to the internal IP address ?) Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:34 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. Vaclav On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi, > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > Thanks, > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)? > Vaclav > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed. > > Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ? > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > Hi, > > debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log. > > > > If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE). > > Vaclav > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Which level of debug should I use ? > > > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed) > > > > > > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice. > > > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module. > > > > > > Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)? > > > There should be lots of messages. > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Do you think that I need unixsock module ? > > > > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ? > > > > > > > > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook. > > > > Everything seems to work except presence messages. > > > > > > > > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log. > > > > Only these lines: > > > > > > > > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no > > > > socket found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR: > > > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2 > > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify > > > > returned -7 May 2 > > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket > > > > found May > > > > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket > > > > found > > > > > > > > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration. > > > > I need help desperately. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > ilker > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/010A0601/07074F05/02054D06/122…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Serusers] IM + Presence help
by Suraj Kumar 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi, I am trying to use IM with ser. Followed the installation procedures as suggested in the presence hand book and running the sample config with db that comes in it but I have the following error in it: ------------------------------------------------ rls_mod_init(): 'xcap_root' not set (global XCAP root)! 0(21638) init_mod(): Error while initializing module rls ERROR: error while initializing modules ------------------------------------------------ I have compiled and installed the sip_router from its cvs source but I had ignore one error message sercmd not compiled; not sure if it has anything to do with it. thanks a lot, suraj

2 1

[Serusers] error loading module?
by Giuseppe Parlato 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi all, I had this problem in the morning so I had to restar ser again to make it work.. May 2 12:00:45 dns2 kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 May 2 12:00:45 dns2 kernel: No ISA tormenta card found at d0000 May 2 12:00:45 dns2 kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Unloaded May 2 12:00:45 dns2 insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.20-8smp/misc/torisa.o: init_module: Input/output error May 2 12:00:45 dns2 insmod: Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module parameters, including invalid IO or IRQ parameters. You may find more information in syslog or the output from dmesg May 2 12:00:45 dns2 insmod: /lib/modules/2.4.20-8smp/misc/torisa.o: insmod char-major-196 failed I'm not really confident with SER so anyone who can explain me what the problem can be? maybe there's a module that cannot be loaded? please help me thanks Giuseppe

1 0

[Serusers] Content-type
by Steve Morard 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi ! I'm new to SER and I would like to know if it is possible to get the content-type of a message and to use it in ser.cfg like we can do with status (i.e. if (!(status =~ "183")) for instance). I would like SER to behave according to the content-type of some SIP messages and therefore I need a way to get this information about the messages. Thank you for your help Regards Steve

3 2

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 02 May '06

02 May '06

Btw, I've seen following two lines in the beginning of the log: May 2 13:29:15 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19985]: using 'none' rls-subscription authorization! May 2 13:29:15 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[19985]: using 'none' subscription authorization for watcher info! Could they be related ? How can I change these to xcap ? Thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 1:15 PM To: 'Vaclav Kubart' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)? Vaclav On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi, > > I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed. > Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ? > > Thanks, > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Hi, > debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log. > > If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE). > Vaclav > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Which level of debug should I use ? > > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed) > > > > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice. > > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ? > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module. > > > > Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)? > > There should be lots of messages. > > > > Vaclav > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Do you think that I need unixsock module ? > > > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ? > > > > > > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook. > > > Everything seems to work except presence messages. > > > > > > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log. > > > Only these lines: > > > > > > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket > > > found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR: > > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2 > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify > > > returned -7 May 2 > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found > > > May > > > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket > > > found > > > > > > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration. > > > I need help desperately. > > > > > > Regards, > > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > Hi, > > > as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right? > > > Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more. > > > I don't see any problems... :-( > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > > > > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output. > > > > > > > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events. > > > > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ? > > > > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ? > > > > > > > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error. > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > ilker > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/020E0604/07044D04/01034D03/016…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by Vaclav Kubart 02 May '06

02 May '06

I take a look into the log and it seems, that NOTIFY requests try to be sent to 192.168.2.17. But in the ngrep dump I see only some 85.105.102.167 addresses in Contacts in SUBSCRIBE requests. Are you sure, that these log and the flow belong to the same scenario? If yes, it means, that there is a bug in PA module. Be sure to catch messages on machine with presence server. Vaclav On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:14:37PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi, > > I've captured debug logs by suggestion of Mr. Michal Matyska. > Attached I'm sending them to you. I hope it reaches you. > Please look for the "no socket found" and "Can't send watcherinfo notification " lines in the log as it's too long. > > Thanks, > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:28 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > You don't need anything else. Are you sure that changed config is used by ser (you can try to add a mistake there, if SER will complain in startup or not)? > Vaclav > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:24:59PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed. > > Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ? > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > Hi, > > debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log. > > > > If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE). > > Vaclav > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Which level of debug should I use ? > > > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed) > > > > > > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice. > > > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ilker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module. > > > > > > Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)? > > > There should be lots of messages. > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Do you think that I need unixsock module ? > > > > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ? > > > > > > > > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook. > > > > Everything seems to work except presence messages. > > > > > > > > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log. > > > > Only these lines: > > > > > > > > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket > > > > found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR: > > > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2 > > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify > > > > returned -7 May 2 > > > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > May > > > > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket > > > > found > > > > > > > > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration. > > > > I need help desperately. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > ilker > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM > > > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right? > > > > Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more. > > > > I don't see any problems... :-( > > > > > > > > Vaclav > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > > > > > > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output. > > > > > > > > > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events. > > > > > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ? > > > > > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ? > > > > > > > > > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > ilker > > > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/03090704/07004405/00024C03/101…> > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. > This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi, I've sent an attachment (including debug logs as you requested) to you. Please inform me if you don't receive it. Thanks, ilker <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0A090504/07064D05/09054E03/191…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 02 May '06

02 May '06

Thanks, That was the problem... Now I'm getting the logs. -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Michal Matyska Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:35 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, You need check your syslogd configuration file, as the messages with severity level "debug" might become unused. /etc/syslogd.conf should contain lines like this: *.=debug;\ auth,authpriv.none;\ news.none;mail.none -/var/log/debug If you add the line, don't forget to restart syslog deamon. Or you can set the error reporting to the stderr handle and then run ser with stderr redirected to file. If log_stderr is not defined in your config file, you can use -E parameter to achieve that: ser -E 2> ser_err.log Michal On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi, > > Which level of debug should I use ? > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed) > > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice. > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ? > > Thanks, > ilker _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/010C0504/0404490C/02064E03/824…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi, Which level of debug should I use ? debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed) Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice. Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module. Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)? There should be lots of messages. Vaclav On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi, > > Do you think that I need unixsock module ? > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ? > > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook. > Everything seems to work except presence messages. > > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log. > Only these lines: > > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket > found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR: > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2 10:56:49 > sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 2 > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found May > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket found > > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration. > I need help desperately. > > Regards, > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Hi, > as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right? > Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more. > I don't see any problems... :-( > > Vaclav > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output. > > > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events. > > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ? > > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ? > > > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error. > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > ilker > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/030A0601/04014E01/090A4D06/202…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3 2

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi, I changed it to "debug=4" and restarted ser but nothing changed. Is there anything missing in my configuration ? Do I need a seperate module for debug messages ? Thanks, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 12:15 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, debug=4 should be enough. And if you restart ser with this debug level, there should be really lots of messages in the log. If you have another proxy doing NAT it is probably not needed to do it on presence server (and if oter messages work like MESSAGE). Vaclav On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 11:39:01AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi, > > Which level of debug should I use ? > debug= ? (I tried debug=7 but nothing changed) > > Btw, my clients are behind NAT. But I already forward them to an RTP+SIP proxy for voice communication. And there is no rpoblem with voice. > Should I use any nathelper configuration for presence messages ? > > Thanks, > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 11:23 AM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > I think, that this problem is not caused by absence of unixsock or unconfigured fifo module. > > Have you restarted ser after changing debug level (debug=xxx in cfg)? > There should be lots of messages. > > Vaclav > > On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 10:49:22AM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Do you think that I need unixsock module ? > > Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ? > > > > I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook. > > Everything seems to work except presence messages. > > > > After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log. > > Only these lines: > > > > May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket > > found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR: > > notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2 > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify > > returned -7 May 2 > > 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found > > May > > 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket found > > > > If it would help , I can send you my full configuration. > > I need help desperately. > > > > Regards, > > ilker > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM > > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > > > Hi, > > as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right? > > Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more. > > I don't see any problems... :-( > > > > Vaclav > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > > > Hi Vaclav, > > > > > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output. > > > > > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events. > > > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ? > > > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ? > > > > > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error. > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > ilker <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/010C0605/07024D03/02044D02/724…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Users] Attended Transfer
by Bastian Schern 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hello, does anybody got a working configuration to make an "attended call transfer" with a call through an Asterisk gateway? Example: PSTN --> Asterisk --> SER --+-- A | +-- B The call will come from the PSTN Network and will go through "A". A sets the call on "Hold" and calls "B". After A is connected with B, A hangup an B got the call from PSTN. This in _not_ working at the moment. Attended call transfer only with OpenSER and only SIP-Phones is no Problem. But if the is an Asterisk as PSTN-GW in the game it will not work. Regards Bastian ____________ Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit Version: AVK 16.7010 from 25.04.2006 Virus news: www.antiviruslab.com

3 6

[Users] questions about OPENSER and Asterisk integration
by B Boc 02 May '06

02 May '06

hi, i have some basic conceptual questions about integrating Operser with Asterisk. Most of the examples I have read about so far talks about using asterisk for voice mail but can the integration also cash in on the other asterisk features? The examples always make reference to using asterisk to call out on the PSTN. I would assume that calling in on the PSTN and calling in/out on IAX channel would be equally viable but would it also make sense to use it to call in/out via SIP? my questions stem from my desire to utilize a lot of asterisk features because I just don't know openser well enough to start writing bespoke scripts. Stated another way (I did own up to the fact that I am no Openser guru) I would like to utilize all the work I have already done with asterisk and frontend it with the openser. Thereby having asterisk doing the typical softswitch work (call waiting, call forward, privacy manager, follow me, queues, conferencing, voice mail, etc) and openser doing the SIP proxy and NAT traversal capabalities for the UAs. thanks

2 1

[Serusers] Mediaproxy load balancing
by Dejan Kovacevic 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hello all. I have installed ser 0.9.7 and configured it to work with mediaproxy. For now it (mediaproxy) is running locally on the same machine as ser. But i want make it with load balancing. But i dont know how to configure DNS SRVS For example if my ser is running on machine; example.somecompany.com then i have to add these lines? _mediaproxy._tcp.example.somecompany.com. IN SRV 0 25 25060 mediamachine1.somecompany.com. _mediaproxy._tcp.example.somecompany.com. IN SRV 0 25 25060 mediamachine2.somecompany.com. _mediaproxy._tcp.example.somecompany.com. IN SRV 0 50 25060 mediamachine3.somecompany.com. _mediaproxy._tcp.example.somecompany.com. IN SRV 10 50 25060 mediamachine11.somecompany.com. _mediaproxy._tcp.example.somecompany.com. IN SRV 10 50 25060 mediamachine12.somecompany.com. So if I have understood these lines right it means, that first three proxies are main for taking care of the rtp traffic? 1st proxy 25% 2nd proxy 25% 3rd proxy 50% ? Ok the last lines are then the failback proxies? OK if this is true,. i just don't know how to go further,.. I know that i have to put these lines in /etc/bind/ But i dont know how to use them in zones file. Also i wuold like to know what i have to confiure in mediaproy.ini to make that working,... I just cant find any exact explanation on net :( I would be very thankfull for any help given. Regards Dejan Slovenia

2 2

[Users] Will Ser Web interface work with current OpenSer?
by Tony Su 02 May '06

02 May '06

Is OpenSer still similar enough to "borrow" the SER web interface which was published Sept 2005? Or, if anyone has used that tool is worth evaluating? TIA.

2 1

[Users] Is there a searchable archive of this mail list?
by Tony Su 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hoping to find answers if the topic has already been discussed...

2 1

[Users] Re: openser and proxy
by buxalex＠libero.it 02 May '06

02 May '06

hello, some more hints: if I try to register a softphone (express talk) when openser is off, rightly the answer is: ------------------------------------------------------------ Server 82.104.192.27 did not respond to register (user 001) Check server details for that line ------------------------------------------------------------ when openser is on, when I try to register the softphone I get: ------------------------------------------------------------ Register attempt for proxy 82.104.192.27 failed 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) ------------------------------------------------------------ Am I missing something into configuration? Anyone can please give me some hints? Many thanks in advance Alex ---------- Initial Header ----------- >From : users-bounces(a)openser.org To : "klaus.mailinglists" klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at Cc : "users" users(a)openser.org Date : Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:51:07 +0200 Subject : Re: [Users] openser and proxy > I have this configuration: > > | - > LAN > adsl -> router | > | -> linux pc with openser > > > the router translate the private IP 192.168.xxx with the public IP 82.xxx > any softphone in the LAN register with openser but only if I enter as server the IP 192.168.xxx. if I enter the public IP, express talk (softphone) refuse the registration with error 500. > > from outside (I tried with a different internet provider) i cannot register anyway. > > > in the openser.cfg I didn-t configure anything related proxies or nat, should I do something? > > attached is my openser.cfg > > thanks > alex > > > > > > > > ---------- Initial Header ----------- > > >From : "Klaus Darilion" klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at > To : "buxalex(a)libero.it" buxalex(a)libero.it > Cc : "users" users(a)openser.org > Date : Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:50:58 +0200 > Subject : Re: [Users] openser and proxy > > > > > > > > > buxalex(a)libero.it wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have an ADSL internet connection which goes to a router. > > >>From the router I have a linux machine with openser installed, > > > and a econd connection goes to a LAN. > > > Openser IP address = 192.168.100.106 and I have a public IP (82.104.xxx.xxx)dedicated to this address. There is no restriction to any port. > > > I thought it was enough to be seen from outside, but unfortunately, when I try to register any softphone, the registration fails. > > > > > > > Is there a dedicated router in front of the Linux PC or is the Linux PC > > also the router? > > > > btw: maybe this helps you: http://www.milkfish.org/ > > > > regards > > klaus > > > > > There is no way to let it work? Should I put openser on internet before the router? > > > > > > Thanks > > > Alessandro > > > > > > > > > I have a openser installation which has an IP address = 192.168.100.106. > > > To be reachable from softphones > > > outside the proxy > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Users mailing list > > > Users(a)openser.org > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > >

2 1

Re: [Users] openser and proxy
by buxalex＠libero.it 02 May '06

02 May '06

I have this configuration: | - > LAN adsl -> router | | -> linux pc with openser the router translate the private IP 192.168.xxx with the public IP 82.xxx any softphone in the LAN register with openser but only if I enter as server the IP 192.168.xxx. if I enter the public IP, express talk (softphone) refuse the registration with error 500. from outside (I tried with a different internet provider) i cannot register anyway. in the openser.cfg I didn-t configure anything related proxies or nat, should I do something? attached is my openser.cfg thanks alex ---------- Initial Header ----------- >From : "Klaus Darilion" klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at To : "buxalex(a)libero.it" buxalex(a)libero.it Cc : "users" users(a)openser.org Date : Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:50:58 +0200 Subject : Re: [Users] openser and proxy > buxalex(a)libero.it wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have an ADSL internet connection which goes to a router. > >>From the router I have a linux machine with openser installed, > > and a econd connection goes to a LAN. > > Openser IP address = 192.168.100.106 and I have a public IP (82.104.xxx.xxx)dedicated to this address. There is no restriction to any port. > > I thought it was enough to be seen from outside, but unfortunately, when I try to register any softphone, the registration fails. > > > > Is there a dedicated router in front of the Linux PC or is the Linux PC > also the router? > > btw: maybe this helps you: http://www.milkfish.org/ > > regards > klaus > > > There is no way to let it work? Should I put openser on internet before the router? > > > > Thanks > > Alessandro > > > > > > I have a openser installation which has an IP address = 192.168.100.106. > > To be reachable from softphones > > outside the proxy > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users(a)openser.org > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >

2 1

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi, Do you think that I need unixsock module ? Also, do I need any configuration for fifo module ? I'm now using the CVS version and with full configuration in the presence handbook. Everything seems to work except presence messages. After increasing the loglevel to 7 there is no more information in the log. Only these lines: May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: send_winfo_notify returned -7 May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18649]: t_uac: no socket found May 2 10:56:49 sesapp /root/ser/sbin/ser[18655]: t_uac: no socket found If it would help , I can send you my full configuration. I need help desperately. Regards, ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 10:09 AM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi, as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right? Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more. I don't see any problems... :-( Vaclav On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output. > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events. > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ? > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ? > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error. > > Thanks for your help. > > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 3:08 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Hi Ilker :-) > > > Hi again, > > > > Really your information is helping me very much. > > I re-compiled the CVS version with xcap module. And added parameters you suggested. > > > > Now, I registered one client and I see 3 errors : > > 1- after a REGISTER message I see the following line 2 times: > > t_uac: no socket found > > I need to see the message flow - try to catch something with ngrep. > (ngrep -W byline port 5060 -d any) > > > > > 2- after a SUBSCRIBE message (after register) I see the following errors: > > check_message(): Unsupported event package > > ERROR: subscribe.c:860: Error while checking message > > ERROR: subscribe.c:948: handle_subscription about to send_reply and > > return -2 > > This means, that a SUBSCRIBE to unsupported events arrives - this is probably not problem (for example eyeBeam tries to subscribe to something like "xcap change", I'm not sure now). This is not needed for presence handling. > > > > > 3- after another SUBSCRIBE message I see the following lines: > > t_uac: no socket found > > ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) > > send_winfo_notify returned -7 > > > > I think, it could be problem with contact in "presence.winfo" > subscription. I need to see message flows between client and SER. > (Watcherinfo - more precisely presence.winfo event package > - is used for watching to "who is watching a user" - see RFC 3857). > > Vaclav > > > What is watcherinfo and why doesn't it work with the config ? > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/020C0600/04024D05/08024D07/614…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2 1

[Serusers] urgent please help
by ravi reddy 02 May '06

02 May '06

hello sir thanks for your reply i got one doubt, can you clarify me. Iam runninng ser version 0.9.6 on fedora core 4 Is the ser version version stable which iam using now ? because in /var/run i dint find a file belongs to ser.pid and one more thing is in /etc/rc.d/init.d there is nothing related to ser that . in the sense for example iam running asterisk ,mysql ...every thing i can see the exucutable files in /etc/rc.d/init.d but nothing belongs to SER . And one more thing i had connected to the database mysql and when i make serctl add it name password email to shows *ERROR: SER/FIFO NOT ACCESSIBLE: 2.* at last i want to know is is this version stable ? if not please tell me how to uninstall this SER and please tell me a stable version that you know which will works fine on fedora 4 waiting for your reply.. Thanks in advance. regards * ravi*

1 0

[Users] empty response from mediaproxy
by unplug 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi, Recently, I found that there is the following error in the log. error: use_media_proxy(): empty response from mediaproxy The error will cause a looping problem last for 5 minutes (looping time out). The result is user failed to make call and the network will be congested if serveral users having the same looping problem at the same time. What will cause that error? Is it a bug for mediaproxy? system configuration: openser 1.0.1 + mediaproxy 1.4.2 unplug

1 2

[Serusers] error ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4_src or the last cvs version of ser
by Laurent Schweizer 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hello, i try to compile ser-0.10.99-dev35-pa-4_src or the last cvs version of ser and i have always rhis error : Laurent gcc -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall -minline-all-stringops -falign-loops -DNAME='"sercmd"' -DVERSION='"0.1"' -DARCH='"x86_64"' -DOS='"linux"' -D__CPU_x86_64 -D__OS_linux -DUSE_READLINE -c sercmd.c -o sercmd.o gcc -Wl,-O2 -Wl,-E parse_listen_id.o sercmd.o -lresolv -lreadline -o sercmd /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetnum' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgoto' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetflag' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `BC' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tputs' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `PC' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetent' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `UP' /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.5/../../../../lib64/libreadline.so: undefined reference to `tgetstr' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [sercmd] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/installsrc/ser_cvs/sip_router/utils/sercmd' ERROR: utils/sercmd/sercmd not compiled

1 0

[Users] using aliases or dbaliases
by unplug 02 May '06

02 May '06

What is the difference between using table of aliases & dbaliases? As I know, openser will load the records in aliases to memory when it starts. There is a problem when the aliases table contains over 15,000 records and openser will fail to start due to the memory problem. As search from the module document, dbaliases can be used to replace aliases. The records in dbaliases store in DB instead of memory when openser starts. Everytime, openser will query the DB for the alias of an account. Am I right?

2 3

[Users] Regarding on openser...
by raviprakash sunkara 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hello Everybody, Good Evening to all. Please help me on openser and softphone. 1) what's the use of ngrep and sipsak in openser 2) when i make a call through sip-phones. its shows " logging fail cantact network admin " its means ? what.. What i need to take the steps in openser.cfg file.. please help me in this regarding , its very very important and time up for my dead line. -- Sunkara Ravi Prakash

2 1

[Users] Problem in openser_fifo...
by raviprakash sunkara 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hello Everybody, Please solve my issues. If I restart the openserctl file .... 1) Stopping OpenSER : No PID file found! OpenSER probably not running 2) And I didn't see the openser_fifo in "/tmp/" directory... These are my problem. How to solve this problem.... Help me.... And please excuse me if any mistakes in My English Thanks and Regards -- Sunkara Ravi Prakash

2 1

Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by Vaclav Kubart 02 May '06

02 May '06

Hi, as I can see from the dump - MESSAGEs go through without problems, right? Try to increase debug level in config file, might be, you will see more. I don't see any problems... :-( Vaclav On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 03:32:24PM +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: > Hi Vaclav, > > I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output. > > "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events. > Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ? > Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ? > > For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error. > > Thanks for your help. > > ilker > > -----Original Message----- > From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 3:08 PM > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems > > Hi Ilker :-) > > > Hi again, > > > > Really your information is helping me very much. > > I re-compiled the CVS version with xcap module. And added parameters you suggested. > > > > Now, I registered one client and I see 3 errors : > > 1- after a REGISTER message I see the following line 2 times: > > t_uac: no socket found > > I need to see the message flow - try to catch something with ngrep. > (ngrep -W byline port 5060 -d any) > > > > > 2- after a SUBSCRIBE message (after register) I see the following errors: > > check_message(): Unsupported event package > > ERROR: subscribe.c:860: Error while checking message > > ERROR: subscribe.c:948: handle_subscription about to send_reply and > > return -2 > > This means, that a SUBSCRIBE to unsupported events arrives - this is probably not problem (for example eyeBeam tries to subscribe to something like "xcap change", I'm not sure now). This is not needed for presence handling. > > > > > 3- after another SUBSCRIBE message I see the following lines: > > t_uac: no socket found > > ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) > > send_winfo_notify returned -7 > > > > I think, it could be problem with contact in "presence.winfo" > subscription. I need to see message flows between client and SER. > (Watcherinfo - more precisely presence.winfo event package > - is used for watching to "who is watching a user" - see RFC 3857). > > Vaclav > > > What is watcherinfo and why doesn't it work with the config ? > > > > Thanks, > > ilker > > > > > > > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/06090104/04064505/03044A03/651…> > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. > This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

[Users] Re: Document
by Jh 02 May '06

02 May '06

1 0

[Users] Re: Document
by Jh 02 May '06

02 May '06

1 0

[Serusers] mediaproxy vs rtpproxy in the production
by Ramu Yadav 01 May '06

01 May '06

Hi All, Is this a good idea to use mediaproxy in the production. Presently we using mediaproxy and making oddly 20 simultaneous outbound calls and we are experiecing bad voice quality and mediaproxy is taking the CPU 20 to 50 %. We are in a idea to use rtp proxy in place of mediaproxy. (past experiences appreciated) Is this a good idea to use asterisk as a NAT handling device and for RTP. Ideas and your experiences are highly appreciated. -- Ramu Yadav

1 0

[Serusers] Problem with SER/SEMS
by Jon Farmer 01 May '06

01 May '06

Hi I am trying to setup SER/SEMS using unix_socket. I am trying out the echo app using if (uri=="sip:200@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx") { t_relay(); if(!t_write_unix("/tmp/am_sock","echo")) { t_reply("500","error contacting sems"); }; break; }; however the phone connects and the call timer start to run but no echo and the following in syslog May 1 14:22:46 localhost ser[18236]: ERROR: _reply_light: can't generate 500 reply when a final 513 was sent out May 1 14:22:46 localhost ser[18236]: unixsock_t_reply: reply failed May 1 14:22:46 localhost ser[18236]: unix_server_loop: Command 't_reply' failed with return value -1 May 1 14:22:46 localhost Sems[18061]: Error: (AmRequest.cpp)(reply)(335): AmRequestUAS::reply: 500 Reply failed Any ideas what is happening? -- Jon Farmer Telford, Shropshire, UK

1 0

[Serusers] unknown domain problem
by Marco Passarinho 01 May '06

01 May '06

I have SER-0.9.6 and postgresql db for authentication. I'm using x-lite. It seams like I have everything correct in ser.cfg file. When I start X-lite and it tryes to authenticate I always get the same error "403 unknown domain". I configured the SRV record in DNS correctly. What could be causing this problem? Thanks Marco Passarinho

1 0

RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems
by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) 01 May '06

01 May '06

Hi Vaclav, Did you receive the ngrep output I've sent you ? If so, what do you suggest ? Thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 3:32 PM To: 'Vaclav Kubart' Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi Vaclav, I've installed ngrep and sending you ngrep output. "t_uac: no socket found" error is occuring in nearly all of the events. Should I use unixsock module ? If yes, what are the needed parameters ? Currently fifo module is loaded. Should I use it also ? For problem 2 ; you are right. I am using Eyebeam. Then I'll ignore this error. Thanks for your help. ilker -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 3:08 PM To: İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] IM and presence problems Hi Ilker :-) > Hi again, > > Really your information is helping me very much. > I re-compiled the CVS version with xcap module. And added parameters you suggested. > > Now, I registered one client and I see 3 errors : > 1- after a REGISTER message I see the following line 2 times: > t_uac: no socket found I need to see the message flow - try to catch something with ngrep. (ngrep -W byline port 5060 -d any) > > 2- after a SUBSCRIBE message (after register) I see the following errors: > check_message(): Unsupported event package > ERROR: subscribe.c:860: Error while checking message > ERROR: subscribe.c:948: handle_subscription about to send_reply and > return -2 This means, that a SUBSCRIBE to unsupported events arrives - this is probably not problem (for example eyeBeam tries to subscribe to something like "xcap change", I'm not sure now). This is not needed for presence handling. > > 3- after another SUBSCRIBE message I see the following lines: > t_uac: no socket found > ERROR: notify.c:398: Can't send watcherinfo notification (-7) > send_winfo_notify returned -7 > I think, it could be problem with contact in "presence.winfo" subscription. I need to see message flows between client and SER. (Watcherinfo - more precisely presence.winfo event package - is used for watching to "who is watching a user" - see RFC 3857). Vaclav > What is watcherinfo and why doesn't it work with the config ? > > Thanks, > ilker > <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0B090706/03044C0A/0F074C01/981…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

1 0

[Serusers] 401 Unauthorized
by Joao Pereira 01 May '06

01 May '06

Hello to all Im trying to register SIP clients (Cisco IP phone and Planet VIP )that are located behind an ADSL line ( and behind NAT), and the first time they register, they receive the OK from SER, but when I reboot the phone, they cant connect again. They receive "401 Unauthorized" from SER. SER isnt returning "401 Unauthorized" in any part of ser.cfg Im not using firewall. Can the problem be in the type of NAT? Can someone help me? Thanks Joao Pereira

3 2

RE: [Serusers] loose_route's bug?
by Vitaly Nikolaev 30 Apr '06

30 Apr '06

Cant help without config (did u do record_route() before relying INVITE?) ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Ramin Nikaeen Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:17 PM To: Serusers Subject: [Serusers] loose_route's bug? Hi Everyone, I am really stuck here. I really need help! I receive the following ACK request in SER from a Linksys/PAP user agent that SER should forward to the destination User Agent: 2010000002. ACK sip:2010000002@10.1.10.65:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.15.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-5fb5b16;rport From: 2224440133 <sip:2224440133@host.domain.com>;tag=692c5bafde7b5655o0 To: <sip:2224449999@host.domain.com>;tag=3b968d2d Call-ID: c813c237-8673e16d(a)172.16.15.51 CSeq: 101 ACK Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr>, <sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr> Contact: 2224440133 <sip:2224440133@172.16.15.51:5060> User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2-3.1.5(LS) Content-Length: 0 But SER's loose_route incorrectly modifies this ACK as follows: ACK sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.65;branch=0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.15.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-5fb5b16;rport=5060 From: 2224440133 <sip:2224440133@host.domain.com>;tag=692c5bafde7b5655o0 To: <sip:2224449999@host.domain.com>;tag=3b968d2d Call-ID: c813c237-8673e16d(a)172.16.15.51 CSeq: 101 ACK Max-Forwards: 16 Route: Contact: 2224440133 <sip:2224440133@172.16.15.51:5060> User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2-3.1.5(LS) Content-Length: 0 Which causes the ACK to keep looping through SER: ACK sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.65;branch=0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.65;branch=0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.15.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-5fb5b16;rport=5060 From: 2224440133 <sip:2224440133@host.domain.com>;tag=692c5bafde7b5655o0 To: <sip:2224449999@host.domain.com>;tag=3b968d2d Call-ID: c813c237-8673e16d(a)172.16.15.51 CSeq: 101 ACK Max-Forwards: 15 Route: Contact: 2224440133 <sip:2224440133@172.16.15.51:5060> User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2-3.1.5(LS) Content-Length: 0 ACK sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:10.1.10.65;ftag=692c5bafde7b5655o0;lr=on> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.65;branch=0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.65;branch=0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.65;branch=0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.15.51:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-5fb5b16;rport=5060 From: 2224440133 <sip:2224440133@host.domain.com>;tag=692c5bafde7b5655o0 To: <sip:2224449999@host.domain.com>;tag=3b968d2d Call-ID: c813c237-8673e16d(a)172.16.15.51 CSeq: 101 ACK Max-Forwards: 14 Route: Contact: 2224440133 <sip:2224440133@172.16.15.51:5060> User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2-3.1.5(LS) Content-Length: 0 I am really stuck. Can anyone tell me what is happening?! Thanks ramin

5 5

[Serusers] Re: Serusers Digest, Vol 36, Issue 26
by steve 30 Apr '06

30 Apr '06

Hi All, we have a requirement for building a commercial Billing module and Calling card solution on SER , please let us know in case if there is a open soure solution or a commercial solution available ready. Regards Steve Manager Sales http://www.astcode.com ( One Stop solution for all commercial source codes based on asterisk) win $ 5000 Bounty for most innovative and user friendly application on asterisk

1 0

[Serusers] fifo=/tmp/ser_fifo in your config
by Iraklis Zografos 30 Apr '06

30 Apr '06

Hi to all I am trying to initiate SER with my asterisk box and I am getting the fllowing error when I try to serctl moni command -------------------------------------------------------------- Error opening ser's FIFO /tmp/ser_fifo Make sure you have line fifo=/tmp/ser_fifo in your config -------------------------------------------------------------- I have allready defined fifo=/tmp/ser_fifo in my ser.cfg file. I have also noticed that there is no /tmp/ser_fifo file in my linux box Any ideas Thanks Iraklis

1 0

[Serusers] please help
by ravi reddy 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

hello guys, please help me here is the message i got in my /var/log/messages Apr 29 14:06:46 localhost ser[4489]: Maxfwd module- initializing Apr 29 14:06:46 localhost ser[4489]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 107520 Apr 29 14:06:46 localhost ser[4489]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 215040 Apr 29 14:06:46 localhost ser[4489]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 107520 Apr 29 14:06:46 localhost ser[4489]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 215040 Apr 29 14:06:46 localhost ser[4489]: ERROR: tcp_init: bind(7, 0x811964c, 16) on 127.0.0.1: Address already in use Apr 29 14:06:55 localhost ser: WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.0.76 Apr 29 14:06:55 localhost ser: WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.0.76 and this is my ser.cfg # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.25.2.1 2005/02/18 14:30:44 andrei Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=yes #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) #port=5060 alias="localhost.localdomain.com" #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication # if (!www_authorize("localhost.localdomain.com", "subscriber")) { # www_challenge("localhost.localdomain.com", "0"); # break; # }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } please take a look in to this file and try to help me....... ravi.

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users