- sr-users - kamailio.org

Kamailio3.2 debian repo fails
by Benjamin Henrion 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

Hi, I have the following /etc/apt/sources.list: ======================================================== $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian squeeze main contrib non-free deb-src http://ftp.debian.org/debian squeeze main contrib non-free deb http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio32 squeeze main deb-src http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio32 squeeze main ======================================================== Which generates the following error: ======================================================== $ apt-get update Ign http://deb.kamailio.org squeeze Release.gpg Ign http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio32/ squeeze/main Translation-en Ign http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio32/ squeeze/main Translation-en_US Ign http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio32/ squeeze/main Translation-en_US.UTF-8 Ign http://deb.kamailio.org squeeze Release Ign http://deb.kamailio.org squeeze/main Sources Hit http://ftp.debian.org squeeze Release.gpg Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/contrib Translation-en Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/contrib Translation-en_US Ign http://deb.kamailio.org squeeze/main amd64 Packages Ign http://deb.kamailio.org squeeze/main Sources Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/contrib Translation-en_US.UTF-8 Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-en Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main Translation-en_US.UTF-8 Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/non-free Translation-en Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/non-free Translation-en_US Ign http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/non-free Translation-en_US.UTF-8 Hit http://ftp.debian.org squeeze Release Ign http://deb.kamailio.org squeeze/main amd64 Packages Err http://deb.kamailio.org squeeze/main Sources 404 Not Found Err http://deb.kamailio.org squeeze/main amd64 Packages 404 Not Found Hit http://ftp.debian.org squeeze/main Sources Hit http://ftp.debian.org squeeze/contrib Sources Hit http://ftp.debian.org squeeze/non-free Sources Hit http://ftp.debian.org squeeze/main amd64 Packages Hit http://ftp.debian.org squeeze/contrib amd64 Packages Hit http://ftp.debian.org squeeze/non-free amd64 Packages W: Failed to fetch http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio32/dists/squeeze/main/source/Sources.gz 404 Not Found W: Failed to fetch http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio32/dists/squeeze/main/binary-amd64/Packages… 404 Not Found E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. ======================================================== Who is responsible for the debian packaging? Best, -- Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403 "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy. Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or democratically elected legislators."

3 6

Re: [SR-Users] Siremis: cannot enter domain in "New Subscriber"window
by Uwe Andersen 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

Hi Hugh, it works now. Thank you! Uwe > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org > [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org]Im Auftrag von > Hugh Waite > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. November 2011 12:52 > An: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > UsersMailing List > Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] Siremis: cannot enter domain in "New > Subscriber"window > > > Hi Uwe, > > Domains are configured in Server Services->Domain List. > These are the > domains which the kamailio server is responsible for. > When they have been entered there, they will appear in the drop-down > list when adding users. > > Regards, > Hugh > > On 02/11/2011 11:33, Uwe Andersen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to add a new user. So I choose "add" from the > "Subscriber Management" page. > > On the "New Subscriber" page I can enter username, > password, email-address, etc. > > But the line for "domain" seems to be an empty dropdown entry. > > I cannot choose, add or edit anything. > > As a result I cannot save the new user because Siremis > complains about the empty domain field. > > > > After adding a user by command line("kamctl add ...") the > user appears on the management page. > > If I edit that user via Siremis the line for domain is not > a dropdown but a "normal" text field. > > > > Can somebody explain this? > > > > BR, > > Uwe > > > > P.S.: I'm using Siremis 2.0 and Kamailio 3.2.0. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users > mailing list > > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > -- > -- > Hugh Waite > Senior Design Engineer > Crocodile RCS Ltd. > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users > mailing list > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >

1 0

Siremis: cannot enter domain in "New Subscriber" window
by Uwe Andersen 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

Hi, I want to add a new user. So I choose "add" from the "Subscriber Management" page. On the "New Subscriber" page I can enter username, password, email-address, etc. But the line for "domain" seems to be an empty dropdown entry. I cannot choose, add or edit anything. As a result I cannot save the new user because Siremis complains about the empty domain field. After adding a user by command line("kamctl add ...") the user appears on the management page. If I edit that user via Siremis the line for domain is not a dropdown but a "normal" text field. Can somebody explain this? BR, Uwe P.S.: I'm using Siremis 2.0 and Kamailio 3.2.0.

2 1

FW: App_python Module
by Muhammad Nasir Bhutta 02 Nov '11

02 Nov '11

Hi, I am a new user of Kamailio, and I am working on enabling the App_Python module in Kamailio.. While searching on google, I came acroos your email on the forum where you people are trying to patch the App_Python module.. I am wandering whether you can please help a bit .. 1- How to do the configuration to enable the App_python module ? .. At the moment, I am just adding the following line in the configuration file, loadmodule "app_python.so" and just correcting the path to handler.py to the right directory in the code for script path. 2- What output we should expect when we enable the app_python module ? .. I have seen the handler.py script written in python which is printing some sip message information ? .. 3- How the SIP Message structure is being passed to handler.py ? ... How we are accessing the Router module in handler.py script and LM_ERR function from Kamailio ? .. Any help in this regards shall be really helpful .. In any case, whether you can solve this issue or not, please reply the email.. With many thanks.. Kind Regards, Nasir

2 3

sdpops and dynamic codec ids
by Juha Heinanen 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

i made call sdp_keep_codecs_by_name("PCMU,PCMA,speex"); on an invite request and it didn't keep speex although it was in the sdp: Session Description Protocol Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0 Owner/Creator, Session Id (o): sems 1 1 IN IP4 192.98.102.10 Session Name (s): sems Connection Information (c): IN IP4 192.98.102.10 Time Description, active time (t): 0 0 Media Description, name and address (m): audio 40000 RTP/AVP 101 102 8 0 3 2 9 96 97 98 99 100 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:101 iLBC/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:102 speex/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:2 G721/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:9 g722/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:97 G726-32/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:98 G726-24/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:99 G726-40/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:100 G726-16/8000 it is so that sdpops module does not support codecs, whose ids are dynamic, but only codecs with static ids? -- juha

2 14

enabling app_python module in Kamailio
by Muhammad Nasir Bhutta 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi, I am trying to enable the app_python module in Kamailio to run a simple python script externally parallel with Kamailio proxy, While I try to load the module "app_python.so" in configuration file, the Kamailio server fails to start.. I can't see what is the problem .. The steps, I am following are that: - Script written in python saved in home directory. - Loadmodule "app_python.so" statement in configuration file. - Modparam("app_python", "script_name", "location of script") - Python_exec("function", "parameters list") .. I have also tried to check the Kamailio configuration option, It gives following warning, 0(2942) WARNING: <core> [sr_module.c:584]: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/app_python.so: exports dlflags interface is deprecated and it will not be supported in newer versions; consider using mod_register() instead I am wandering if any one can please help in this matter, I shall be very thankful .. With many thanks .. Kind Regards, Nasir Muhammad Nasir Bhutta Solutions Architect Britannic Technologies Ltd t: +44 1483 544812 f: +44 845 0501001 mbhutta(a)btlnet.co.uk<mailto:mbhutta@btlnet.co.uk> www.btlnet.co.uk<http://www.btlnet.co.uk> [cid:image001.jpg@01CC881F.1EA78300]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/britannic-technologies/products>[cid:image002.jpg@01CC881F.1EA78300]<http://www.twitter.com/BritannicTech>[cid:image003.jpg@01CC881F.1EA78300]<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Britannic-Technologies/202957249732198>[cid:image004.jpg@01CC881F.1EA78300]<http://www.youtube.com/user/BritannicTech> ________________________________ [cid:image007.jpg@01CC881F.4A995BF0]<http://www.btlnet.co.uk/> Watch the Telegraph Business Club video about Britannic at our educational TV site - britannictech.tv<http://britannictech.tv> Our 8th Annual Convergence Summit is being held at Silverstone on 17th November 2011. Book your place now<http://www.btlnet.co.uk/news--events/2011/convergence-summit-2011/register> and discover the world of Hosting and Cloud Services. ________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and delete this email. The views expressed in this email are personal, and do not constitute a commitment by Britannic Technologies Ltd unless specified by a separate, written agreement. Registered Office: Britannic House, Merrow Business Park, Guildford, Surrey GU4 7WA. Registered in England no. 2090797. ________________________________

3 4

app_python module
by Muhammad Nasir Bhutta 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi, I have successfully installed the app_python module for the default example of handler.py .. Now, I need to see the output of handler.py,.. I have following questions: 1- What is the output of this module ? does it prints the specific message information extracted from SIP message ? 2- How to write modparam and python_exec in configuration file ? I have tried to write modparam("app_python", "mod_init") but, it gives error and says to use mod_register function instead and I don't know more about mod_register function. 3- I have also tried to use python_exec("child_init", 2) , The Kamailio starts successfully.. When, I connect a soft client to Kamailio, then nothing happens ? How to see the output of handler.py script . Any help in this regards shall be really appreciated .. With thanks. Kind Regards, Nasir

1 0

script local flags
by Uri Shacked 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi, I am using the script local flags. i set a flag like this "setsflag(6)" in order to use it afterwards. i notice that this flag is relevent only for the request i am dealing with right now. because after the reply the flag seems to reset without me doing that doing "issflagset(6)" and getting nowhere :-) am i right or am i using it wrong?

2 1

FW: App_python Module
by Muhammad Nasir Bhutta 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi, I am a new user of Kamailio, and I am working on enabling the App_Python module in Kamailio.. While searching on google, I came acroos your email on the forum where you people are trying to patch the App_Python module.. I am wandering whether you can please help a bit .. 1- How to do the configuration to enable the App_python module ? .. At the moment, I am just adding the following line in the configuration file, loadmodule "app_python.so" and just correcting the path to handler.py to the right directory in the code for script path. 2- What output we should expect when we enable the app_python module ? .. I have seen the handler.py script written in python which is printing some sip message information ? .. 3- How the SIP Message structure is being passed to handler.py ? ... How we are accessing the Router module in handler.py script and LM_ERR function from Kamailio ? .. Any help in this regards shall be really helpful .. In any case, whether you can solve this issue or not, please reply the email.. With many thanks.. Kind Regards, Muhammad Nasir Bhutta Solutions Architect Britannic Technologies Ltd t: +44 1483 544812 f: +44 845 0501001 mbhutta(a)btlnet.co.uk<mailto:mbhutta@btlnet.co.uk> www.btlnet.co.uk<http://www.btlnet.co.uk> [cid:image001.jpg@01CC9895.3EC504B0]<http://www.linkedin.com/company/britannic-technologies/products>[cid:image002.jpg@01CC9895.3EC504B0]<http://www.twitter.com/BritannicTech>[cid:image003.jpg@01CC9895.3EC504B0]<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Britannic-Technologies/202957249732198>[cid:image004.jpg@01CC9895.3EC504B0]<http://www.youtube.com/user/BritannicTech> ________________________________ [cid:image005.jpg@01CC9895.3EC504B0]<http://www.btlnet.co.uk/> Watch the Telegraph Business Club video about Britannic at our educational TV site - britannictech.tv<http://britannictech.tv> Our 8th Annual Convergence Summit is being held at Silverstone on 17th November 2011. Book your place now<http://www.btlnet.co.uk/news--events/2011/convergence-summit-2011/register> and discover the world of Hosting and Cloud Services. ________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender and delete this email. The views expressed in this email are personal, and do not constitute a commitment by Britannic Technologies Ltd unless specified by a separate, written agreement. Registered Office: Britannic House, Merrow Business Park, Guildford, Surrey GU4 7WA. Registered in England no. 2090797. ________________________________

1 0

flags and masks in carrierroute
by Uri Shacked 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi, I did not understand the explanation of the use of flags and mask. I understand flags are for matching and mask is doing something. But, what exactly does the mask do? How do i see or use it? And regarding the flags... i did "setflag(16)" before the CR function. Set the DB col as needed, and no match was found... Any help here?

1 0

siremis: login error / http error 404
by Uwe Andersen 01 Nov '11

01 Nov '11

Hi Ramona, You hit it! After enabling "rewrite" it is working now. Thank you very much! Uwe > > I have installed Siremis 2.0.0 and Kamaillio 3.2.0 on a > OpenSuse 11.4 system. > > After the Siremis Web Installation Wizard finished the > setup the login failed with a http error 404. > > > > The Apache2.0 error_log shows: > > [Mon Oct 31 11:09:49 2011] [error] [client ::1] File does > not exist: /var/www/siremis-2.0.0/siremis/system, referer: > http://localhost/siremis/index.php/user/login > > > > The Apache2.0 access_log shows: > > ::1 - - [31/Oct/2011:11:09:36 +0100] "GET > /siremis/bin/antispam_image.php?form=user.form.LoginForm&name= > antispam&length=6&level=2?rand=1768032447 HTTP/1.1" 200 240 > "http://localhost/siremis/index.php/user/login" "Mozilla/5.0 > (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1" > > ::1 - - [31/Oct/2011:11:09:48 +0100] "POST > /siremis/bin/controller.php?F=RPCInvoke&P0=[user.form.LoginFor > m]&P1=[Login]&__this=btn_login:onclick&jsrs=1 HTTP/1.1" 200 > 214 "http://localhost/siremis/index.php/user/login" > "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1" > > ::1 - - [31/Oct/2011:11:09:49 +0100] "GET > /siremis/system/general_default HTTP/1.1" 404 1331 > "http://localhost/siremis/index.php/user/login" "Mozilla/5.0 > (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1" > > > > Is there anybody how can help me out of this? > > do you have mod_rewrite enabled in your apache2 server?

1 0

Memory Leak on DB Errors?
by Klaus Darilion 31 Oct '11

31 Oct '11

Hi! I recently had a problem with Kamailio 3.1.4 (provided Debian packages): I had some DB problems (missing tables). Thus, the timer module failed to insert the statistics (for siremis): ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:120]: driver error on query: Table 'kamailio.statistics_tmx' doesn't exist ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:130]: error while submitting query ERROR: sqlops [sql_api.c:217]: cannot do the query This happened for some time (weeks?), other DB queries were unaffected. Then, suddenly Kamailio ran out of memory: ERROR: <core> [sip_msg_clone.c:506]: ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate memory ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1338]: ERROR: new_t: out of mem: ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1478]: ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:282]: ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) It do not think it is a load problem as the server is more or less idle. May it be a memory leak due to wrong error handling? Where there any fixes recently? Thanks Klaus

3 16

current shm memory status
by Klaus Darilion 31 Oct '11

31 Oct '11

Hi! Is there a way to get the status of shm memory? (used memory vs. free memory) Thanks Klaus

2 4

siremis: login error / http error 404
by Uwe Andersen 31 Oct '11

31 Oct '11

Hi, I have installed Siremis 2.0.0 and Kamaillio 3.2.0 on a OpenSuse 11.4 system. After the Siremis Web Installation Wizard finished the setup the login failed with a http error 404. The Apache2.0 error_log shows: [Mon Oct 31 11:09:49 2011] [error] [client ::1] File does not exist: /var/www/siremis-2.0.0/siremis/system, referer: http://localhost/siremis/index.php/user/login The Apache2.0 access_log shows: ::1 - - [31/Oct/2011:11:09:36 +0100] "GET /siremis/bin/antispam_image.php?form=user.form.LoginForm&name=antispam&length=6&level=2?rand=1768032447 HTTP/1.1" 200 240 "http://localhost/siremis/index.php/user/login" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1" ::1 - - [31/Oct/2011:11:09:48 +0100] "POST /siremis/bin/controller.php?F=RPCInvoke&P0=[user.form.LoginForm]&P1=[Login]&__this=btn_login:onclick&jsrs=1 HTTP/1.1" 200 214 "http://localhost/siremis/index.php/user/login" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1" ::1 - - [31/Oct/2011:11:09:49 +0100] "GET /siremis/system/general_default HTTP/1.1" 404 1331 "http://localhost/siremis/index.php/user/login" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1" Is there anybody how can help me out of this? Regards, Uwe Andersen

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] uac module - error searching pvar "uac_req"
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 31 Oct '11

31 Oct '11

On 10/31/11 2:09 PM, Vladimir Broz wrote: > ah, that was the problem :( ok. Don't forget to keep the mailing list always cc-ed, so people reading the archive for similar issues will find the conclusion, whether the hints were solving or not the problem. Cheers, Daniel > > Thanks Daniel! > -Vlada > > On 10/31/2011 01:37 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> Hello, >> >> be sure you load uac module from modules_k, not from modules_s. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> >> On 10/31/11 12:36 PM, Vladimir Broz wrote: >>> ignore the "sip:b@@test.com" -> same result with the correct (only one >>> "@") value >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Vlada >>> >>> On 10/31/2011 12:21 PM, Vladimir Broz wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I compiled 3.2 (master) with FLAVOUR=ser and I'm trying to use "uac" >>>> module. >>>> >>>> my config looks like: >>>> ... >>>> $uac_req(method)="NOTIFY"; >>>> $uac_req(ruri)="sip:server.test.com"; >>>> $uac_req(furi)="sip:a@test.com"; >>>> $uac_req(turi)="sip:b@@test.com"; >>>> ... >>>> >>>> and I'm getting this config file error >>>> >>>> 0(26125) ERROR: <core> [pvapi.c:706]: error searching pvar "uac_req" >>>> 0(26125) ERROR: <core> [pvapi.c:910]: wrong char [m/109] in >>>> [$uac_req(method)] at [9 (5)] >>>> 0(26125) : <core> [cfg.y:3501]: parse error in config file >>>> /root/vbroz/ser-srrs-bpi.cfg, line 388, column 2-17: unknown script >>>> pseudo variable $uac_req(method) >>>> ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) >>>> >>>> What's wrong? >>>> >>>> Any help is appreciated... >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> -Vlada >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >>>> list >>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

uac module - error searching pvar "uac_req"
by Vladimir Broz 31 Oct '11

31 Oct '11

Hi, I compiled 3.2 (master) with FLAVOUR=ser and I'm trying to use "uac" module. my config looks like: ... $uac_req(method)="NOTIFY"; $uac_req(ruri)="sip:server.test.com"; $uac_req(furi)="sip:a@test.com"; $uac_req(turi)="sip:b@@test.com"; ... and I'm getting this config file error 0(26125) ERROR: <core> [pvapi.c:706]: error searching pvar "uac_req" 0(26125) ERROR: <core> [pvapi.c:910]: wrong char [m/109] in [$uac_req(method)] at [9 (5)] 0(26125) : <core> [cfg.y:3501]: parse error in config file /root/vbroz/ser-srrs-bpi.cfg, line 388, column 2-17: unknown script pseudo variable $uac_req(method) ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) What's wrong? Any help is appreciated... Thanks in advance, -Vlada

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] how to retrieve the contact username from 3xx reply?
by Uri Shacked 30 Oct '11

30 Oct '11

Thanks! works great.

1 0

how to retrieve the contact username from 3xx reply?
by Uri Shacked 30 Oct '11

30 Oct '11

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com> Date: Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:16 PM Subject: how to retrieve the contact username from 3xx reply? To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> I need to store the user i get from the 301 reply to an AVP and use it afterwards in another route. How can i retrieve the contact from the 3xx reply? uac_redirect does not have this option and t_load_contacts does not work for me as well.... Anyone has an idea?

2 1

module docs broken
by Timo Reimann 28 Oct '11

28 Oct '11

Hey, documentation on the dialog module seems to be broken: The master branch directory content is empty http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/master/modules_k/dialog/ 3.1 shows close to nothing http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/3.1/modules_k/dialog/dialog… Moreover, 3.0 gives me 404 on the entire modules_k path: http://sip-router.org/docbook/sip-router/branch/3.0/modules_k/ Help. :) Cheers, --Timo

2 2

T1 timer
by Vitaliy 28 Oct '11

28 Oct '11

Hello, How can i change T1 timeout for transaction created by the UAC module (uac_req_send). Do i have to call t_set_retr before uac_req_send and then t_reset_retr() before t_relay ? I use uac_req_send to send accounting to the remote server and i want to increase retransmit timeout for such signalling messages.

4 5

Fwd: [RAI] SIPit 29 Summary
by Klaus Darilion 28 Oct '11

28 Oct '11

FYI -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [RAI] SIPit 29 Summary Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 09:40:51 +0200 From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks(a)nostrum.com> To: rai(a)ietf.org (also available at https://www.sipit.net/SIPit29_summary) SIPit 29 was hosted by Etsi Plugtests in Monte Carlo, Monaco the week of October 24-27, 2011. There were 34 attendees from 17 companies visiting from 12 countries. We had 25 distinct implementations. The roles represented (some implementations act in more than one role) 20 endpoints 5 proxy/registrars The b2buas attending this event were not attempting to appear to be proxies. Implementations using each transport for SIP messages: UDP 92% TCP 96% TLS 88% (24% server-auth-only) SCTP 8% DTLS 0% 44% of the implementations present supported IPv6. There were three RFC4474 Identity implementations present. For DNS we had support for: Full RFC3263 : 76% SRV only : 16% A records only : 08% no DNS support : 0% Support for various items in the endpoints: 75% replaces 50% ice 40% 5389stun 35% turn 25% sip/stun multiplexing 30% gruu 25% history-info (there were no implementations of 4244bis) 20% outbound 20% path 20% diversion 15% 3489stun 10% join 5% service-route 0% sigcomp Support for various items in the proxy/registrars: 100% path 80% sip/stun multiplexing 60% gruu 40% outbound 40% diversion 20% service-route 0% history-info The endpoints and b2buas implemented these methods: 100% INVITE, CANCEL, ACK, BYE 95% REFER 95% NOTIFY 80% REGISTER 80% INFO 75% OPTIONS 75% UPDATE 75% PRACK 60% SUBSCRIBE 35% MESSAGE 30% PUBLISH 100% of the implementations sent RTP from the port advertised for reception (symmetric-rtp). 30% of the implementations required the other party to use symmetric-rtp. 90% of the UAs present both sent RTCP and paid attention to RTCP they received. 80% of the endpoints present supported SRTP using sdes. There were no dtls-srtp implementations at this SIPit. 35% of the endpoints supported multipart/MIME. There were no implementations present with S/MIME support. 36% of the implementations present followed RFC6026 (corrections to the INVITE transaction) 36% followed RFC4320 (corrections to the non-INVITE transaction) Not counting implementations that support events only for REFER: There were 3 SIP Event Server implementations There were 5 SIP Event Client implementations These event packages were supported: Server Client 1 2 presence 1 1 presence.winfo 1 4 message-summary 1 1 dialog 1 1 reg 1 1 conference 1 1 xcap-diff 0 2 kpml These packages were supported with the eventlist extension: Server Client 0 1 presence Two of the proxies present still rely only on max-forwards and one that implemented 3261 loop detection. There were two implementations of fork-loop-fix, but no implementations of max-breadth. Multiparty tests (Notes provided by several test participants, including Eoin McLeod, Trond Andersen, Olle Johansson, and Adrian Georgescu) ** IPv6 Focused Tests The first multiparty session of the event focused specifically on IPv6. We used a basic forking scenario with endpoints registered with several proxies at the bottom of the tree. We had a mix of single and dual-stack endpoints, many supporting video. None of the participant's code would put both v4 and v6 candidates into ICE. Rather, it made assumptions about which candidates to use based on what was happening with the SIP signaling. We ran tests using SRV configurations stating that v6 should be tried first and v4 tried if the v6 failed (and a second configuration that tested v4 first) to ensure that implementations would fail forward and try both address families, with mixed results. We confirmed that one UA configured to use IPv6 only was able to request and use an IPv4 turn allocation and succeeded in making a call between an IPv4 UA and IPv6 ua. Most UAs that supported dual-stack had a configuration to tell the application to ignore any returned AAAAs due to issues encountered in deployments where endpoints autoconfigured IPV6 that didn't actually work. We successfully tested calls going though a mix of v4 and v6 hops (accruing Via and Route/Record-Route headers with addresses in both families. There was an instance of UA registering using sip-outbound (RFC5626) that used IPv4 and IPv6 flows simultaneously. We set up automated tests of using SRV records to indicate preference for IPv4 or IPv6. Two ipv4 only clients proved that they connect to a domain indicating preference for IPv6. ** Forking There are still UAs that do not sensibly handle multiple 200 OKs to a forked INVITE. When testing handling multiple 200 OKs on a simple two branch fork, we encountered an interesting failure. As the proxy handled the 200 OK from branch 1, it sent a CANCEL to the other branch. The UA on branch 2 had already responded with a 200 OK, so it responded to the CANCEL with a 200, but rather than ignoring it, it decided to send a BYE on the dialog. This surprised the calling UA which had chosen the 200 OK from branch 2 to keep, having already sent a BYE to the dialog from branch 1. The better thing for the UA to have done is ignore the CANCEL after replying to it. ** TLS Most of the implementations at the event supported TLS, and all the multiparty tests exercised it. One session focused on proper certificate verification. We tested a certificate at a server with several SAN URI fields, none of which matched the URI used for the server, but a CN that did. Only one UA failed to connect because of this, the rest of the UAs connected happily (or not at all, but because of other issues). Most of the implementations were "before 5922" code, which meant that there was a lot of checking of the Subject/CN. ** Identity There were several SIP Identity implementations present. We tested creating and verifying the Identity assertions at proxies. It wasn't immediately obvious to some implementers that the resource pointed to by the Identity-Info URI had to be DER encoded (a result of the requirement to use application/pkix-cert). Unfortunately, the tar encoded at the end of 4474 has .cer files in it that are PEM encoded. ** STUN/TURN/ICE and Outbound We spent a significant fraction of the multiparty test time (three sessions) focusing on STUN/TURN/ICE and Outbound. There are still clients using RFC 3489 STUN. The participants noted operator pushback against deploying ICE because when things go wrong, it's very hard to diagnose when, where and why they went wrong. If the endpoints always sent a reINVITE (or UPDATE) when concluding ICE, even if they used the default candidates, this diagnosis of failures would be much easier. Examples noted by the participants: * Without a mandatory conclusion, is not possible to know how long it took until end-points had successful media path established * Without a mandatory conclusion, is not always possible to know if different than default candidates have been chosen as lack of INVITE does not tell deterministically what happened * Without a mandatory conclusion, it is not possible for the callee to restart ICE if it does not agree with the conclusion We successfully exercised endpoints setting up and managing multiple outbound flows through separate edge proxies to a proxy/registrar (with different implementations taking turns in the proxy registrar role). We forced the network to break the flow in use in each case, verifying that subsequent dialog-forming requests would take an alternate flow. We discovered an issue with the recommendation in 5626 to have edge proxies record-route that prevents subsequent in-dialog requests from using alternate flows. ** SRTP All implementations supported SDES for SRTP key exchange. Good interop with many different combinations of endpoints. Some calls were left up for an extended period so that sequence number wrapping and roc increments were tested. Once the roc had changed the call was put on hold and resumed with success. In this situation new RTP streams with different SSRCs were created and the sequence number/roc combination re-generated thus proving that support for multiple SRTP contexts exists. Debate surrounding how to signal 'best-effort crypto' continues. Some implementations choose to advertise RTP/AVP with a=crypto attributes and then go crypto if answer also has them and non-crypto if they do not. RTP/SAVP is used to signal the desire for mandatory crypto. Another approach observed was to repeat the same media line twice, once for crypto and once for non-crypto and rely on the receiving end to only accept one of them and port reject the other. In this case both m-lines had the same port number and payload number descriptions so if a receiving end accepted both then the originator would have no clue as to whether it was receiving crypto or non-crypto traffic. ** Unusual messages We tried several kinds of valid, but unusual messages. Very few implementations did the right thing with a request-URI with an unknown scheme - some phones would answer an INVITE with that in the request-URI. ** Specification questions / comments RFC 3263 currently says "If no SRV records are found, the client SHOULD use TCP for a SIPS URI" - it should probably say TLS over TCP. In the spirit of Happy Eyeballs, there should be some guidance on what to do when the RFC 3263 process results in both A and AAAA records and the client is capable of using both. There were implementations of SIP over DTLS, but the specification of that usage seems not to have completed. There were questions on whether internationalized domain names could be used in SIP URIs. For use of SDP with ICE, there was an argument about whether a=rtcp was mandatory if rtcp was on the next port up. RFC 5245 says "If the agent is utilizing RTCP, it MUST encode the RTCP candidate using the a=rtcp attribute as defined in RFC 3605 [RFC3605].", and 3605 says "when that port is not the next higher (odd) port number following the RTP port described in the media line" to motivate why the attribute was created to begin with. Any updates to 5245 should clarify that adding the a=rtcp attribute is not optional when RTCP is being sent on the next higher port. _______________________________________________ RAI mailing list RAI(a)ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rai

1 0

How to limit maximum number of calls
by Austin Einter 28 Oct '11

28 Oct '11

Hi I am running kamailio proxy (1.5) as an intermediate proxy, where all my SIP signalling packets are passing through. I want to limit maximum number of calls kamailio proxy server can handle at a time. How can I do this, please give me some pointer in this regard. Regards Austin

4 7

new email contact
by Timo Reimann 28 Oct '11

28 Oct '11

Hey all, this is just to let everybody know that my email contact has changed to sr(a)foo-lounge.de . Of course, I'm still on the lists but if anyone aware of my former email address wishes to contact me directly, please refer to the new address in the future. Thanks a lot and cheers, --Timo

1 0

Asterisk 1.8 and Kamailio 1.5 issue
by Rowell Rufino 27 Oct '11

27 Oct '11

Hi, We are having issues where the "OK" or "ACK" is that is coming from the phone is not relayed by OpenSER to Asterisk. Below is the sip trace... I am also attaching a tcpdump. Please help what we can do. Received from udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:41:476 (490 bytes): SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.0.64:5060 ;received=10.30.0.64;branch=z9hG4bK-wowp1kmdy4rl;rport=5060 From: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=6wkdms1r20 To: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as0b87218f Call-ID: 3c26755bf15c-9iq08xqqblo6 CSeq: 4 INVITE Server: Asterisk PBX 1.8.7.1 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH Supported: replaces, timer Content-Length: 0 ------------------------------ Sent to udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:41:481 (387 bytes): ACK sip:vm9513261429@10.1.10.83:5060 SIP/2.0 v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.0.64:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-wowp1kmdy4rl;rport Route: <sip:10.1.10.80;lr=on> f: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=6wkdms1r20 t: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as0b87218f i: 3c26755bf15c-9iq08xqqblo6 CSeq: 4 ACK Max-Forwards: 70 m: <sip:91421@10.30.0.64:5060>;reg-id=1 l: 0 ------------------------------ Received from udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:42:130 (868 bytes): SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.0.64:5060 ;received=10.30.0.64;branch=z9hG4bK-5evtiw6dm0po;rport=5060 Record-Route: <sip:10.1.10.80;lr=on> From: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=qi3i8ze6z8 To: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as3f8c0f96 Call-ID: 3c2676547a8d-2t5yi6jok1sv CSeq: 2 INVITE Server: Asterisk PBX 1.8.7.1 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH Supported: replaces, timer Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uas Contact: <sip:9513261429@10.1.10.83:5060> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 256 v=0 o=root 1355451627 1355451627 IN IP4 10.1.10.83 s=Asterisk PBX 1.8.7.1 c=IN IP4 10.1.10.83 t=0 0 m=audio 16094 RTP/AVP 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv ------------------------------ Sent to udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:42:132 (385 bytes): ACK sip:9513261429@10.1.10.83:5060 SIP/2.0 v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.0.64:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-wszafb7cbzpw;rport Route: <sip:10.1.10.80;lr=on> f: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=qi3i8ze6z8 t: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as3f8c0f96 i: 3c2676547a8d-2t5yi6jok1sv CSeq: 2 ACK Max-Forwards: 70 m: <sip:91421@10.30.0.64:5060>;reg-id=1 l: 0 ------------------------------ Received from udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:42:232 (503 bytes): BYE sip:91421@10.30.0.64:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.80;branch=z9hG4bKe723.bf70c1f4.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.83:5060;branch=z9hG4bK69f53cf1 Max-Forwards: 69 From: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as3f8c0f96 To: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=qi3i8ze6z8 Call-ID: 3c2676547a8d-2t5yi6jok1sv CSeq: 102 BYE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 1.8.7.1 *X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Protocol error, unspecified *X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 111 Content-Length: 0 Regards, Rowell

2 1

Asterisk 1.8 and Kamailio 1.5 issue
by Rowell Rufino 26 Oct '11

26 Oct '11

Hi, We are having issues where the "OK" or "ACK" is that is coming from the phone is not relayed by OpenSER to Asterisk. Below is the sip trace... I am also attaching a tcpdump. Please help what we can do. Received from udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:41:476 (490 bytes): SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.0.64:5060;received=10.30.0.64;branch=z9hG4bK-wowp1kmdy4rl;rport=5060 From: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=6wkdms1r20 To: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as0b87218f Call-ID: 3c26755bf15c-9iq08xqqblo6 CSeq: 4 INVITE Server: Asterisk PBX 1.8.7.1 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH Supported: replaces, timer Content-Length: 0 ________________________________ Sent to udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:41:481 (387 bytes): ACK sip:vm9513261429@10.1.10.83:5060 SIP/2.0 v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.0.64:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-wowp1kmdy4rl;rport Route: <sip:10.1.10.80;lr=on> f: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=6wkdms1r20 t: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as0b87218f i: 3c26755bf15c-9iq08xqqblo6 CSeq: 4 ACK Max-Forwards: 70 m: <sip:91421@10.30.0.64:5060>;reg-id=1 l: 0 ________________________________ Received from udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:42:130 (868 bytes): SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.0.64:5060;received=10.30.0.64;branch=z9hG4bK-5evtiw6dm0po;rport=5060 Record-Route: <sip:10.1.10.80;lr=on> From: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=qi3i8ze6z8 To: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as3f8c0f96 Call-ID: 3c2676547a8d-2t5yi6jok1sv CSeq: 2 INVITE Server: Asterisk PBX 1.8.7.1 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH Supported: replaces, timer Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uas Contact: <sip:9513261429@10.1.10.83:5060> Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 256 v=0 o=root 1355451627 1355451627 IN IP4 10.1.10.83 s=Asterisk PBX 1.8.7.1 c=IN IP4 10.1.10.83 t=0 0 m=audio 16094 RTP/AVP 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv ________________________________ Sent to udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:42:132 (385 bytes): ACK sip:9513261429@10.1.10.83:5060 SIP/2.0 v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.30.0.64:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-wszafb7cbzpw;rport Route: <sip:10.1.10.80;lr=on> f: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=qi3i8ze6z8 t: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as3f8c0f96 i: 3c2676547a8d-2t5yi6jok1sv CSeq: 2 ACK Max-Forwards: 70 m: <sip:91421@10.30.0.64:5060>;reg-id=1 l: 0 ________________________________ Received from udp:10.1.10.80:5060 at 26/10/2011 10:22:42:232 (503 bytes): BYE sip:91421@10.30.0.64:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.80;branch=z9hG4bKe723.bf70c1f4.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.10.83:5060;branch=z9hG4bK69f53cf1 Max-Forwards: 69 From: <sip:9513261429@ser.gowireless.net;user=phone>;tag=as3f8c0f96 To: "Virgil Menendez" <sip:91421@ser.gowireless.net>;tag=qi3i8ze6z8 Call-ID: 3c2676547a8d-2t5yi6jok1sv CSeq: 102 BYE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 1.8.7.1 X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Protocol error, unspecified X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 111 Content-Length: 0 Regards, Rowell

1 0

Who is at Astricon?
by JR Richardson 26 Oct '11

26 Oct '11

I am. On 10/25/11, sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org <sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org> wrote: > Send sr-users mailing list submissions to > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sr-users-owner(a)lists.sip-router.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 2. Re: Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 05:44:06 +0200 > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Dispatcher Confusion (v3.2.0) > To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> > Message-ID: <4EA78206.4060203(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; Format="flowed" > > Hello, > > On 10/25/11 5:52 PM, Asgaroth wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> Thanks for the clarrification, >> >> On 25/10/2011 16:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>> >>> >>> 4.6. |ds_mark_dst("s")| >>> >>> Mark the last used address from destination set as inactive >>> ("i"/"I"/"0"), active ("a"/"A"/"1") or probing ("p"/"P"/"2"). With >>> this function, an automatic detection of failed gateways can be >>> implemented. When an address is marked as inactive or probing, it >>> will be ignored by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'. >>> >> >> Above is the part that is a little misleading, it says that >> >> "When an address is marked as inactive or probing, it will be ignored >> by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'." >> >> This, to me, means that if a gateway is in probing mode >> (Active-Probing) then it wont be selected in the destination set >> because it is in probing mode, if this is not the case then maybe the >> above line should read: >> >> "When an address is marked as inactive or inactive-probing, it will be >> ignored by 'ds_select_dst' and 'ds_select_domain'." >> >> This brings me to my next question then, how would I set the state of >> a destination to Inactive-Probing (state: IP) from the routing script. >> The ds_mark_dst() function only allows one of "a", "i", "p". >> >> If I do a ds_mark_dst("i"), then the state changes to "IX", Inactive >> with no probing to tell when gateway is back up. >> >> If I do a ds_mark_dst("i") and then right after ds_mark_dst("p"), a >> log is printed saying that you cannot put a destination into probing >> state when it is marked as inactive. > are you sure you run the devel version? There is no such case in the > sources -- send me exactly the log message you get. Only when the > destination is disabled the probing cannot be set, but not the same case > of inactive. > >> >> Is it possible to set the state of a gateway to inactive-probing from >> the routing script? > > Yes, it should be, no constraint in master branch source code. > > Daniel > >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com > Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat > http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda > >

2 1

sip-router listen address
by caio 25 Oct '11

25 Oct '11

Hello, Is there a problem or anything to consider when sharing the same ip/interface between sip proxy and asterisk? I have asterisk on port 5080 and SR at 5060 in the same interface with the same IP address and have a missing BYE when call is over. However, moving asterisk service to different interface and ip in the same box, the issue is solved. I appreciate your comments. Regards, Claudio

3 4

Kamailio.cfg file woes
by Peter Schrock 24 Oct '11

24 Oct '11

I am wondering two things. 1. is there a place on the web that I may find a basic cfg file to at least get Kamailio running. 2. is there a resource that tells you what to include for what you want to use the system for. At this point, it seems like I should just include everything because I don't know what I might not need. I looked at the references on the website and found the information a little overwhelming with all the options that are available. I think smaller bit sizes would be helpful at this time for me. Peter

3 3

onsend_route and replies
by Asgaroth 24 Oct '11

24 Oct '11

Hi All, Does the onsend route get executed for all messages? I'm just performing some xlog's in the onsend_route, but I'm not seeing it being called for replies. Currently my onsend_route looks like: onsend_route { xlog("onsend_route : $rm : Recieve Details $si:$sp -> $Ri:$Rp"); xlog("onsend_route : $rm : Destination Details $snd(af) $snd(proto):$snd(ip):$snd(port)"); } I can see it being executed for initial messages coming in but I dont see it executed for any replies. Thanks

1 1

kamctl dialplan addrule
by Arthur Alkhasyan 24 Oct '11

24 Oct '11

Hi all, I'm new to the list and new to the Kamailio. We are using Kamailio with Mysql to route calls between clients asterisks and SIP PSTN gateways. We have two inbound gateways and one outbound. I need to add outbound gateway and a few new features: 1. Call routing between carriers based at prefixes added by asterisks. I would like to route all calls with prefix 99101 to gateway 1 and prefix 99102 to gateway 2. Prefix have to be striped out before sending call to carrier. 2. Remote Call Forwarding. I have to setup RCF at Kamailio. All calls to the particular DID number have to be forward to another number. I found description for dialplan module and believe the module can work for me. I recompiled Kamailio with dialplan module support and added to config # ----- dialplan params ----- modparam("dialplan", "db_url", "mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser") I did search and found this thread related to my problem: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2009-November/025416.html I try to use kamctl to add rule to the MySQL and can't find proper syntax kamctl dialplan addrule 10 100 1 ^123+ 0 ^(123.+) 0030\1 -bash: syntax error near unexpected token `(' any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] module version mismatch for carrierroute
by Uri Shacked 24 Oct '11

24 Oct '11

Hi, i found out the mistake i made... didn't add the carrierroute to the include modules when making cfg file. thanks

1 0

module version mismatch for carrierroute
by Uri Shacked 24 Oct '11

24 Oct '11

Hi, i installed 3.2 from git. when starting kamailio i get the following: "ERROR: module version mismatch for /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules/carrierroute.so; core: kamailio 3.2.0 (i386/linux); module: kamailio 3.1.4 (i386/linux)" any ideas what to do? thanks, Uri

3 2

Daily tarballs not being created anymore?
by Timo Reimann 24 Oct '11

24 Oct '11

Hi all, something caught my attention today: Apparently, tarballs provided from http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/ do not seem to be updated automatically anymore (the latest files are from March) although the Download page states that this should happen: "Tarballs for master (development) and several branches are made available daily (only if there were changes in the sources from previous tarball)" Is there a reason why tarball creation has ceased? If so, I think the Download page information should be corrected. I'd be prefer to have automatic tarballs again, however, as it's easier to point people not involved into development at tarballs instead of a set of git instructions. Thanks and cheers, --Timo

3 2

Kamailio 3.2 compile error on Solaris 10
by Nathaniel L Keeling 22 Oct '11

22 Oct '11

I am trying to compile the new version of Kamailio, 3.2 on Solaris in a 64bit environment and I am getting this error. I have been searching the internet but have not been able to find any solutions. Any help would be appreciated. CC (gcc) [M xmlrpc.so] xmlrpc.o In file included from ../../parser/msg_parser.h:63:0, from ../../sr_module.h:62, from xmlrpc.c:41: ../../parser/../ip_addr.h:86:23: error: field 'sin6' has incomplete type ../../parser/../ip_addr.h: In function 'ip_addr_loopback': ../../parser/../ip_addr.h:283:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'htonl' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ../../parser/../ip_addr.h:286:3: warning: implicit declaration of function 'IN6_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ../../parser/../ip_addr.h: In function 'sockaddr2ip_addr': ../../parser/../ip_addr.h:353:50: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ../../parser/../ip_addr.h: In function 'su_getport': ../../parser/../ip_addr.h:399:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'ntohs' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ../../parser/../ip_addr.h: In function 'su_setport': ../../parser/../ip_addr.h:418:4: warning: implicit declaration of function 'htons' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] xmlrpc.c: In function 'rpc_scan': xmlrpc.c:1454:6: warning: variable 'fmt_len' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] gmake[1]: *** [xmlrpc.o] Error 1 gmake: *** [modules] Error 1 Thanks Nathaniel

4 3

Force signalling??
by Skyler 21 Oct '11

21 Oct '11

Hi, I'm trying to setup an inbound proxy (Proxy-1) using dispatcher to relay between 2 other proxies (proxy-2 & 3) depending on DID, but I need to force all signalling through Proxy-1. so #2 & 3 only communicate with #1 and #1 only communicates up and down stream. My trouble is, the INVITES contain the original $ru $fu $tu & $ct info when passing down to Proxy-2 or 3. The result is, only partial signalling is being sent to Proxy-1. After the ACK it seems that Proxy-1 is removed from the communication path entirely as $ru becomes $rU@proxy-2 in the ACK from upstream so Proxy-1 is out of the picture from then on. This means BYE's are not working as Proxy-2 & 3 do not have authentication upstream. I suspect that I need to re-write $ru $fu $tu & $ct info on the original INVITE to reflect Proxy-1 information before dispatching. Is that what I'm missing? If so, how would I restore the original INVITE info to send upstream again on replies etc.? Any help is greatly appreciated. Tia, Skyler

3 6

New developer: Mészáros Mihály
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 20 Oct '11

20 Oct '11

Hello, just to let everyone know that a new person got today write access to GIT repository: Mészáros Mihály (cc-ed), having the user id misi. Welcome to development team and looking forward to your contributions! Involved in the mailing lists in the past, he submitted the first new module to be part of next major release: presence_profile, implementation of an extension about sip user agent configuration framework, specified in RFC6080: * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6080 The code of the new module is now in GIT branch misi/ua-profile, to be merge soon to master after initial review are done. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Build version in custom server_header
by Asgaroth 20 Oct '11

20 Oct '11

Hi All, Is it possible to have the build/git version added in a custom server_header/useragent_header? For example, my kamailio version is: version: kamailio 3.2.0 (i386/linux) 94d3b8 if I had the following config options: server_header="Server: Proxy" useragent_header="User-Agent: Proxy" Is it possible to do something like: server_header="Server: Proxy ($buildver)" useragent_header="User-Agent: Proxy ($buildver)" Where "$buildver" is the build/git release (94d3b8)? I'm looking at the core cookbook but I dont see anything that jumps out at me, is there a variable that can do this? Thanks

2 2

ACK routing loop
by Antanas Masevicius 20 Oct '11

20 Oct '11

Hello, after troubleshooting ACK routing loops i came up with a thread: http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2009-March/004123.html In short, loops formed when i entered IP address to 'domain' table of a host which was remote. Call flow: UAC INVITE -> Kamailio (with remote domain entered) -> UAS (host whose IP matches that remote domain) It looks like after loose_route() check ACK to 200 OK gets routed to local host. Besides this issue, IP address of remote host in 'domain' table did no harm at all. Question is, is that normal ACK routing behaviour or loose_route() should still check if given IP in request is really bound to local interface? Domain module documentation states that "A “local” domain is one that the proxy is responsible for", but id does not tell you that you cannot set remote IP address as a local domain. Please advice. Best regards, Antanas Masevicius

2 4

Dispatcher Confusion Redeux
by Asgaroth 20 Oct '11

20 Oct '11

Hi All, I'd like to clear something up with the diapatcher module and it's probing parameters: First things first: ./kamailio -V version: kamailio 3.1.5 (i386/linux) 76fff5 flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, PKG_SIZE 4MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 76fff5 compiled on 16:21:02 Oct 19 2011 with gcc 4.1.2 I think I am suffering from the same confusion as Klaus in the following archive message: http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v/jZFTG61DlcEr9LJbS8Gq I have the following parameters set for the dispatcher module: modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshhold", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 0) When I first start kamailio all gateways are active, no probing occurs. If I then set a gateway inactive (ds_set_state i 1 sip:...), no probing occurs. If I then set same gateway active (ds_set_state a 1 sip:...), no probing occurs. If I mark same gateway as probing (ds_mark_dst("p") after 1 attempt as specified in module parameter), then probing starts. If I then set same gateway inactive (ds_set_state i 1 sip:...) probing still occurs. According to the docs if I set the state of a gateway to inactive then no probing should occur. From my understanding of the docs, if I set ds_probing_mode to 0 then only gateways marked as probing will be "pinged". Can someone with more experienced than myself please clarify how this method is supposed to work. Thanks

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio v3.2.0 Released - new major version is
by Javier Gallart 20 Oct '11

20 Oct '11

Hello congratulations to all the people who has contributed! I'm looking forward to try it out, some of the new features look really promising... Regards Javi > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:30:22 +0200 > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio v3.2.0 Released - new major version is > out > To: kamailio users <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>, sr-dev > <sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org>, business(a)lists.kamailio.org > Message-ID: <4E9DC5BE.8080003(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > Kamailio (OpenSER) SIP Server v3.2.0 is out ? a major release with a > very large number of new features and improvements. > > v3.2.0 release is a result of more than 10 months of development and 2 > months of testing from the teams of Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express > Router (SER) projects. In the year of the 10th celebration of our > project (http://sip-router.org/10-years-ser/), this version comes with > 12 brand new modules in addition to a lot of fresh features in core and > old modules. > > Full release notes, including links for download and documentation, are > available at: > > * http://www.kamailio.org/w/kamailio-openser-v3-2-0-release-notes/ > > Many thanks to all developers and community members that made possible > this release. > > Enjoy SIP routing in a more flexible and easier way with Kamailio v3.2.0! > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com > > > > >

2 1

Kamailio v3.2.0 RPM packages
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 20 Oct '11

20 Oct '11

Hello, forgot to announce explicitly that the RPM packages for CentOS, RedHat, Fedora and OpenSUSE were built quickly after the release. They can be downloaded from OpenSUSE build system portal: Links to download packages for each OS are available in the wiki: * http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/packages/rpms Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

kamctl version
by caio 20 Oct '11

20 Oct '11

Hello, Is kamctl utility version independent of the kamailio binary version? # kamailio -V version: kamailio 3.2.0 (x86_64/linux) 94d3b8 # kamctl version /usr/sbin/kamctl 3.1.0 Just a typo i guess. Regards, Claudio

2 1

kamailio and high-available db backend
by Juha Heinanen 19 Oct '11

19 Oct '11

mino, instead of ndb cluster, you can use drbd together with heartbeat and pacemaker to provide high available mysql/sip server solution. -- juha

1 0

very basic handling for ua-profile event
by MÉSZÁROS Mihály 19 Oct '11

19 Oct '11

Hi, Please find attached a new _very_ basic presence modul to make available user profile provisioning as it stated in RFC6080. Best Regards, Misi

2 3

kamailio and high-available db backend
by Mino Haluz 19 Oct '11

19 Oct '11

Hi, I was using ndb cluster as the dabatase backend for my kamailio setup. The thing is, mysql ndb cluster is difficult to maintain for me and it crashed multiple times (desynchronization, datamemory limit reached, and other strange reasons) and it is not that well documented (the user-base is quite narrow). My question is, what mysql architecture would you recommend me, if it has to be high available, well documented with various examples wihitn the community, thus easy to maintain. DB has 5% writes, 100queries/sec. and its size is 100MB. Mino

1 0

ok
by abdelazize rhosni 19 Oct '11

19 Oct '11

ok

2 1

Kamailio Dispatcher fails in front of FreeSwitch, help (again).
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 18 Oct '11

18 Oct '11

I've asked a lot of question about Kamailio Dispatcher in front of FreeSwitch in this mailing list. So I'm sorry that I'm still "spamming", but it still fails. This is my status so far. When connecting 2 devices directly to FreeSwitch everything works. When connecting to Kamailio, some calls fails with "Timeout" and some fails with "Too many loops". This is my kamailio.cfg: http://pastebin.com/KEuZmikh When connected directly to FreeSwitch where everything works, this is how my clients are registrered in FreeSwitch: http://pastebin.com/prkjkb7g When connected to Kamailio where nothing works, this is how my clients are registrered in FreeSwitch: http://pastebin.com/b5x6NZyv 215.197.145.132 (sip.my-domain.com) is my Kamailio. pbx.my-domain.com is my FreeSwitch. 96.224.14.164 is my IP at home, where my 2 devices are from. Can anyone help me out? I'm kinda lost at this point.

3 11

master branch is now open for commits of new features to be in v3.3.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 18 Oct '11

18 Oct '11

Hello, this is a short notice to let everyone know that the GIT master branch is open for commits of new features -- to be part of next major release v3.3.0, as v3.2.0 has been officially released few moments ago. From this moment on, master and 3.2 branches will diverge, 3.2 taking in only bug fixes. So if you want to use stable release of existing features, switch to branch 3.2. You can find guidelines of installing branch 3.2 in the wiki site: * http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/3.2.x/git I spotted already a new module by one of the community members submitted to the mailing list in the last days, related to presence extensions, therefore looks like is going to be another great development cycle until 3.3.0 will be out. Happy coding SIP routing extensions in SER and Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Kamailio v3.2.0 Released - new major version is out
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 18 Oct '11

18 Oct '11

Kamailio (OpenSER) SIP Server v3.2.0 is out – a major release with a very large number of new features and improvements. v3.2.0 release is a result of more than 10 months of development and 2 months of testing from the teams of Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) projects. In the year of the 10th celebration of our project (http://sip-router.org/10-years-ser/), this version comes with 12 brand new modules in addition to a lot of fresh features in core and old modules. Full release notes, including links for download and documentation, are available at: * http://www.kamailio.org/w/kamailio-openser-v3-2-0-release-notes/ Many thanks to all developers and community members that made possible this release. Enjoy SIP routing in a more flexible and easier way with Kamailio v3.2.0! -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com

1 0

branch 3.2 was created
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 18 Oct '11

18 Oct '11

Hello, short notice to let everyone know that the branch for 3.2.x release series was created with the name 3.2. For example, downloading sources from GIT and building Kamailio flavour form this branch can be done with: git clone --depth 1 git://git.sip-router.org/sip-router kamailio cd kamailio git checkout -b 3.2 origin/3.2 make FLAVOUR=kamailio cfg make all make install The official release of 3.2.0 will follow just a bit later today. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

YACC error during Compile of Kamailio 3.1.5
by Nathaniel L Keeling 18 Oct '11

18 Oct '11

I am building Kamailio 3.1.5 on Solaris 10 64bit environment and I am getting this error. yacc -d -b cfg cfg.y "cfg.y", line 104: fatal: invalid escape, or illegal reserved word: expect gmake: *** [cfg.tab.h] Error 1 I tried compiling with bison, but got errors immediately after getting thru the yacc (I just issued ln -s /opt/csw/bin/bison /opt/csw/bin/yacc and recompiled) flex cfg.lex CC (gcc) [kamailio] lex.yy.o In file included from ip_addr.h:50:0, from globals.h:37, from cfg.lex:91: ut.h: In function 'str2s': ut.h:195:17: warning: variable 'init' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] cfg.lex: In function 'yylex': cfg.lex:561:11: error: 'yylval' undeclared (first use in this function) cfg.lex:561:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cfg.lex:561:40: error: 'FORWARD' undeclared (first use in this function) cfg.lex:562:40: error: 'FORWARD_TCP' undeclared (first use in this function) cfg.lex:563:40: error: 'FORWARD_TLS' undeclared (first use in this function) Thanks Nathaniel L Keeling

1 0

Make all error
by Peter Schrock 17 Oct '11

17 Oct '11

I am doing a "make all" and am getting this error: error: mysql/mysql.h: No such file or directory I have mysql installed and know that kamailio is having trouble finding mysql header files. Is there a configuration I can set up to help kamailio find it? Is there a resource I can be directed to find the info? Peter

3 5

preparing to release v3.2.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 17 Oct '11

17 Oct '11

Hello, tomorrow is the day to release the new major version 3.2.0. Since involves creation of a new branch on GIT repository and some adjustments to the packaging, the plan is to start in the morning with the preparations. If any developer has something left to commit, please do it before 9:00am GMT. Afterwards it is very likely that the branch 3.2 will be created and there will be need for backport (which is fine as well). Then by 14:00 GMT the 3.2 branch should be frozen completely to start packaging the release. From than moment on until the release is announced, please send an email to sr-dev in case anyone wants to commit to branch 3.2. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Organization in SIP header
by Skyler 17 Oct '11

17 Oct '11

Hello all, Is there a way to set Organization: within SIP header? I know how to change user_agent_header and server_header but I'd rather not do that. Also I know I could do append_hf, but is there an organization_header? Thanks, Skyler

3 6

Problem with REGISTER retransmissions
by Alejandro Mingo 17 Oct '11

17 Oct '11

Hi, Since we installed last version of Kamailio (3.1.4) we have been experiencing a big problem with REGISTER retransmissions. When the server receives a retransmitted REGISTER it removes the binding and the UAC remains unregistered until next refreshing period. I include a PCAP capture that shows this behaviour. I am not 100% sure that this problem never happened with older versions. Has anybody experienced the same problem? Thanks in advanced. Alejandro.

3 9

Re: [SR-Users] OPENSER MIB
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 17 Oct '11

17 Oct '11

Hello Stefan, On 3/14/11 11:03 AM, Stefan Tiedje wrote: > Thanks for the answer. > Maybe I have some older versions of the OPENSER-MIB and the other > related MIB's since I could not find the counter you pointed at. I'm > using a MIB browser for reading the MIB's. > Is the suggested counter "expired dialogs" added in a specific release > of Kamailio? Which? We use Kamailio 3.0.2. I used Kamailio and recommend using it sine it has the latest commits for stability. However, what I wrote before is pretty much not related to the version. There is a counter that tracks the processed dialogs, but seems it is not exported by default through snmpstats module. The statistics counter is named "processed_dialogs", implemented by dialog module. You can dump all internal statistics through kamctl or via xmlrpc command, but probably to export it through snmpstats you may need to extend the mibs and the code of the module. I just grepped the sources of snmpstats module to see what dialog statistics it is exporting: $ grep -n _dialogs modules_k/snmpstats/* | grep get_statistic modules_k/snmpstats/alarm_checks.c:83: num_dialogs = get_statistic("active_dialogs"); modules_k/snmpstats/snmpObjects.c:404: int result = get_statistic("active_dialogs"); modules_k/snmpstats/snmpObjects.c:424: get_statistic("active_dialogs") - modules_k/snmpstats/snmpObjects.c:425: get_statistic("early_dialogs"); modules_k/snmpstats/snmpObjects.c:443: int result = get_statistic("early_dialogs"); modules_k/snmpstats/snmpObjects.c:459: int result = get_statistic("failed_dialogs"); modules_k/snmpstats/snmpObjects.c:508: int num_dialogs = get_statistic("active_dialogs"); Perhaps when the snmpstats was developed the dialog module didn't export the statistics counter of "processed_dialogs" and then it was not updated. Now, what I tried to say is that if the "processed_dialogs" counter is not available through snmpstats (and it is not now after grepping the sources) you can get its value from another application through "kamctl get_statistics all" or XMLRPC command for all of the existing kamailio releases. Upcoming one we will look to implement the export through snmpstats as well. If you have time to do it and send us a patch, we will gladly commit it to source tree in our GIT repository. Cheers, Daniel > Do you have the MIB name for the "expired dialogs" counter. I will > look for that in my version of OPENSER MIBS. > Important, do you have a link to where MIB files can be downloaded for > Kamailio 3.0.2? > Below follows an excerp from one of the MIB's. Is it old, I don't know? > > -- *********************************************************************** > > -- OPENSER-MIB: OPENSER MIB > > -- > > -- Date of Creation: Januay 2006 > > -- > > -- This MIB provides information related to the OpenSER SIP Router. > > -- > > -- Copyright (c) The Internet Society (2006) > > -- Ammendments (c) Soma Networks, Inc. (2006) > > -- > > -- All rights reserved. > > -- ***************************************************************** > > /Stefan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda@gmail.com] > *Sent:* den 14 mars 2011 10:16 > *To:* Stefan Tiedje > *Cc:* sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] OPENSER MIB > > Hello, > > On 3/14/11 9:42 AM, Stefan Tiedje wrote: >> Hi, >> In the Kamailio OPENSER-MIB there is the counter >> "openserTotalNumFailedDialogSetups". This is a Counter32. >> The description is: >> "The total number of calls that failed with an error. The >> following codes define a failed call:" >> *Question:* >> >> * I'm looking for the corresponding counter to >> "openserTotalNumFailedDialogSetups" who counts successful >> Dialog setups of Counter32 type. Does it exist? >> * If not, does it exist a work around? >> * Where in the code can the new suggested counter be added? >> * Something else???? >> > > the dialog module counts the number of processed dialogs, see: > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/dialog.html#id2966360 > > There is no counter currently inside dialog module exporting exactly > the number of successfully setup dialogs, it should not be hard to do > it, though. Using the above and the number of failed and expired > dialogs, you can actually get the number of successful dialogs. > > Dialog module being the one that tracks SIP dialogs, therefore being > able to count them, now I don't know if snmpstats module exports all > the counters from dialog module. I setup snmpstats just few weeks ago > and works perfect on Ubuntu/Debian servers, but I had no need to check > dialog module counters. > > Note that you can get the list of all internal statistics via kamctl: > - kamctl fifo get_statistics all > > Or via XMLRPC if you need them remotely in another application. > > Another option is to define your statistics with statistics module. > Knowing that in SIP a successful call dialog means 200ok reply to an > INVITE transaction, you can count it in the onreply_route[abc] that > you arm for relayed transactions with t_on_reply("abc"). > > Hope these help you, > Daniel > >> Suggestion for the new counter is a name like: >> "openserTotalNumSucceededDialogSetups". It has a counter32. >> Description: "The total number of calls that succeeded" >> I know that there are the counters openserCurNumDialogs, >> openserCurNumDialogsInProgress and openserCurNumDialogsInSetup but >> these are of Gauge type who only reflects the current situation. >> These Gauge counters can't be used together with a Counter32 counter. >> That don't mix. The calculation done for the counter >> "openserCurNumDialogsInProgress" should be used where every new >> dialog setup is added to the new suggested counter. A counter of 32 >> should cover a great deal of connections. These counters are usually >> read, if used, every 15 minutes or 1 hour. >> *Rationale:* >> The reason for the new counter is that a calculation between >> succeeded and failed dialog setups can be done and be used for SLA >> agreements. Without this, its hard to make any customer versus >> provider agreements. >> /Stefan >> PS. Ask if anything is unclear and I need an answer rapidly. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://www.asipto.com -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

2 5

cleaning up contacts...
by Krishna Kurapati 16 Oct '11

16 Oct '11

Hi, I am seeing several Contacts for same AOR in userlocation when I do "kamctl ul show". I suspect, it's a result of UA crashing after registering and then registering with different contact after restart. Since the UA crashed, it could not send Register with expire=0 to remove the previous contact. Since the userlocation API is not exported to configuration scripting, I am wondering how to clean any spurious contacts. Thanks Krish Kura

2 1

FIFO error in cfg file
by Peter Schrock 16 Oct '11

16 Oct '11

I tried opening with "kamctl moni" and I get this error message: ERROR: Error opening Kamailio's FIFO FIFO ERROR: Make sure you have the line 'modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "FIFO")' in your config ERROR: and also have loaded the mi_fifo module. I looked at the cfg file and it looks like what it is asking for is already there. Any suggestions would be welcomed. Peter

2 1

Force socket on reply
by Jijo 14 Oct '11

14 Oct '11

Hi All, Our system has two IP address, one is used for kamailio and 2nd one is used for data. The problem is suppose a request came in to kamailio on a TCP connection with first IP address and connection is torned down before sending the response. Later when the response is send out kamialio is using the 2nd IP to create the connection. The reason is kamailio doesn't have force socket in in reply, so it uses INADDR_ANY for soruce addres .so kernel uses source address based on the detaintion IP. I tired to force the socket using pseudo variable $fs or force_send_socket(), but neither of them worked from reply_route. So i modfied the code relay_replay to set the SND_F_FORCE_SOCKET which will use the address where request is recieved as source address to make the TCP connection The code change is shown below. Please let me know is there anyother way we could acheive it? }else{ buf = build_res_buf_from_sip_res( relayed_msg, &res_len ); /* if we build a message from shmem, we need to remove via delete lumps which are now stirred in the shmem-ed structure */ if (branch!=relay) { free_via_clen_lump(&relayed_msg->add_rm); } /* update send_flags with possible additions from the reply route */ SND_FLAGS_OR(&uas_rb->dst.send_flags, &uas_rb->dst.send_flags, &relayed_msg->rpl_send_flags); /* Make the response to use the same IP where it receives the message */ * * * uas_rb->dst.send_flags.f |= SND_F_FORCE_SOCKET; * } Thanks JIjo

2 4

Cannot concect to iptel.org
by Enda Mannion 14 Oct '11

14 Oct '11

Hi, I am trying to connect to the iptel.org SIP server using the recommended jitsi SIP UA. Is the service still up and running? I am using my newly created username and password but I get no response back from the REGISTER I send. Enda

1 0

a=nortpproxy:yes
by Austin Einter 13 Oct '11

13 Oct '11

If the SIP UA is not behind the NAT, and Kamailio insersts a=nortpproxy:yes in SDP body, can it cause one sided audio. I am using PJSIP as my UA, kamailio 3.1.5 , rtp proxy 1.2.1 as intermediate proxy for signalling and media. In kamailio config, I have enabled WITH_NAT. On call setup, only one way audio is there. When I looked at SIP messages, the only additional stuff I can see a=nortpproxy and nat=yes in recpord route. Without kamailio as intermediate proxy, audio is good both way. So I feel, when I bring up kamailio as intermediate proxy I am doing some mistake configuration wise either at PJSIP UA or in Kamailio. Has anybody faced this issue previously. If so please share how can we fix this issue. Thanks in advance Austin

2 1

Tls protocol testing with iptel account
by Lello 13 Oct '11

13 Oct '11

Hi, I'm working with a softphone project named mjSip, now I've implemented the TLS protocol in the softphone and I would try it with 2 iptel account setted on two pc, on the first I have: # MjSip UA configuration file # ___________________________________________ # host_port=5061 transport_protocols= tls outbound_proxy=sip.iptel.org from_url=<sip:alexlel@iptel.org> username=alexlel realm=iptel.org passwd=2387lelloh debug_level=8 log_path=log max_logsize=2000 do_register=yes keepalive_time=8000 _______________________________ the second is such as this. However I have no response in SSL/TLS by the iptel server. Does it work in TLS? Thanks, Regards.

2 1

Employment you've been searching!
by apache＠iptel.org 13 Oct '11

13 Oct '11

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I would like to take this time to welcome you to our hiring process and give you a brief synopsis of the position's benefits and requirements. If you are taking a career break, are on a maternity leave, recently retired or simply looking for some part-time job, this position is for you. [...] Content analysis details: (12.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [188.49.28.2 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: it-jobsearch.com] 1.7 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains an URL listed in the DBL blocklist [URIs: it-jobsearch.com] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?188.49.28.2>] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [188.49.28.2 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 1.5 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 60 to 80% [score: 0.6541] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS

1 0

Can't create a new account with kamctl
by Peter Schrock 12 Oct '11

12 Oct '11

I have finally got to the section of the install section "10. Ready to Rock". Unfortunately, I did get the error message "ERROR: domain unknown: use usernames with domain or set default domain in SIP_DOMAIN". I did the two steps that the instructions gave and cannot find ".kamctlrc" to "add SIP_DOMAIN=mysipserver.com" Please help. I am not quite understanding what should be done to fix this Peter

2 1

Kamailio Developer Seminar, Oct 24-24, San Francisco
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 Oct '11

12 Oct '11

Hello, the place and date for Kamailio/SER Developer Seminar have been set: San Mateo (just south of San Francisco, CA, in the nearby of international airport), for one day and a half, Oct 24-25, 2011. I posted more details, including about content and registration, at: * http://www.kamailio.org/w/2011/10/kamailio-developer-seminar-san-francisco-… Participating fee is 250USD. Selection of attendees is done by the rule of first come first served. The number of seats is limited, don't wait too long if you want to attend. Looking forward to meeting many of you there. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 1

Can anyone help for a small amount of money.
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 12 Oct '11

12 Oct '11

Hi everyone. I'm still facing problems with my Kamailio Dispatcher <-> FreeSWITCH setup. Everything works when connecting directly to FreeSWITCH. When connecting to Kamailio, which should work as a dispatcher (load-balancer) in front of FreeSWITCH I get "Too many hops", "Timeouts" etc. My test setup with SIP clients is an iPhone, an Android, an iPad and a laptops with Ubuntu. Can someone help me out, for a small amount of money, until I can get it to work? Hopefully it's just the kamailio.cfg which needs to do things correctly. Currently I'm using this http://pastebin.com/mahKECAw with help from Morten in this mailing list.

1 0

Creating a database error
by Peter Schrock 12 Oct '11

12 Oct '11

This is what I am getting: INFO: test server charset /usr/local/lib/kamailio//kamctl/kamdbctl.mysql: line 105: mysql: command not found /usr/local/lib/kamailio//kamctl/kamdbctl.mysql: line 106: mysql: command not found Usage: grep [OPTION]... PATTERN [FILE]... Try `grep --help' for more information. /usr/local/lib/kamailio//kamctl/kamdbctl.mysql: line 112: [: =: unary operator expected INFO: creating database openser ... /usr/local/lib/kamailio//kamctl/kamdbctl.mysql: line 71: mysql: command not found ERROR: Creating core database and grant privileges failed! I looked at the files and cannot find the problem. Please help. Peter

3 4

Kamailio Dispatcher and FreeSwitch, Too many hops.
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 12 Oct '11

12 Oct '11

I have a setup with Kamailio as dispatcher in front of a FreeSwitch server. This is my kamailio.cfg: http://pastebin.com/8PR2GFBD I'm currently getting "Too many hops" when calling between SIP clients. I am able to call to FreeSwitch and listen to voicemail, hold music etc. After a long conversation with a FreeSwitch expert, and some tests, I was told that Kamailio delivers the wrong IP (NAT problems) to FreeSwitch. I've also run tshark on both FreeSwitch and Kamailio and when calling between clients they just send the packets between each other. Can anyone help me out? I've tried to Google a lot for this problem and asked in several IRC channels, mailing lists and forums. Without any luck.

6 21

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with Route containing two elements
by davy van de moere 12 Oct '11

12 Oct '11

Owki, reading RFC-3261 again ;) Imho Kamailio does what it is supposed to do, it forwards the packet to the first element in the Route header. But as I received the BYE packet from <sip:their_sbc> , that one should have stripped itself out of the Route header, making everything just work, right? Now I can hackishly fix it with a rewritehostport in the middle. But that will eventually not scale up that nicely. Ergo, does anyone have a good idea on how to e.g. have Kamailio in this situation ignore the first uri in the route header? Or am I still not getting it :) ? thx ! BYE sip:05xxxxxx at my_kamailio <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:their_sbc;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP their_sbc;branch=z9hG4bK1ae8.269e4f67.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP their_internals:5060;received=their_internals;branch=z9hG4bK4f9044a7;rport=5060 Route: <sip:their_sbc;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8>,<sip:36d0a5cfbaeb6b055d5bb02c32127b49_32123456789 at my_kamailio <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> ;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Max-Forwards: 69 From: "Some_Telecom" <sip:02xxxxxxxx at their_sbc <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>>;tag=as5716fec8 To: <sip:05xxxxxx at their_sbc <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>:5060>;tag=U3FrFDm5Zr0KF Call-ID: 68fe6a470986bd087ce4ed860f603af6 at their_sbc <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> CSeq: 103 BYE User-Agent: Integrics Enswitch X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Normal Clearing X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 16 Content-Length: 0 X-Enswitch-RURI: sip:05xxxxxx at my_kamailio <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>:5060;transport=udp X-Enswitch-Source: their_internals:5060

2 2

proxy BYE to itself
by caio 12 Oct '11

12 Oct '11

Hello, I have the following issue. A calls B, talk for a while, then B sends a BYE, but A never receives it. The BYE is transmited from the proxy listening interface:port to itself, but not to the asterisk port. U 2011/10/08 00:29:29.207335 Kamailio_IP:5060 -> Kamailio_IP:5060 BYE sip:Kamailio_IP;lr=on SIP/2.0. The scenario is: A (pstn subs) --> Asterisk:5080 --> Kamailio:5060 --> B (registered sip ua) Asterisk and Kamailio are in the same box, listening both at the same IP (eth iface) address, but one at port 5080, and the proxy at 5060 (udp). The configuration is based on kamailio.cfg file provided by the v3.1.5 (with a few modules added, like dialplan and cr..etc). If A is who send the BYE, everything goes well. I attach the full sip capture. Thanks for you time. Claudio

1 1

Problem with Route containing two elements
by davy van de moere 11 Oct '11

11 Oct '11

I'm trying to integrate to an integrics enswitch, almost everything works like a charm, except on BYE packets as Kamailio in my setup forwards these incorrectly. Digging somewhat I believe the culprit sits in the Route header which comes from the enswitch: Route: <sip:their_sbc;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8>,<sip:36d0a5cfbaeb6b055d5bb02c32127b49_32123456789@my_kamailio ;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Kamailio takes into account the first argument (the thing sip:their_sbc...) on which it cannot find the correct transaction. And forwards it back to the sender, instead of forwarding it correctly to my freeswitch. which gives a storm of traffic ;) If I compare that with an ACK packet in the same transaction , having this as a Route header : Route: <sip:36d0a5cfbaeb6b055d5bb02c32127b49_32123456789@my_kamailio ;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Kamailio sends it along correctly. IMHO if I could convince Kamailio to always take the last part of the Route header into account and ignore the first one it would correctly work. What would be a good approach? Rewriting the route header looks abit harsch. disclaimer : I'm not sure which component is disrespecting the RFC, if any, or if I just fully not get something :) Short overview + packet detail (with some obfuscation): My setup: their_sbc --- my_kamailio --- freeswitch --- my_kamailio --- enduser BYE sip:05xxxxxx@my_kamailio:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:their_sbc;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP their_sbc;branch=z9hG4bK1ae8.269e4f67.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP their_internals:5060;received=their_internals;branch=z9hG4bK4f9044a7;rport=5060 Route: <sip:their_sbc;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8>,<sip:36d0a5cfbaeb6b055d5bb02c32127b49_32123456789@my_kamailio ;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Max-Forwards: 69 From: "Some_Telecom" <sip:02xxxxxxxx@their_sbc>;tag=as5716fec8 To: <sip:05xxxxxx@their_sbc:5060>;tag=U3FrFDm5Zr0KF Call-ID: 68fe6a470986bd087ce4ed860f603af6@their_sbc CSeq: 103 BYE User-Agent: Integrics Enswitch X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Normal Clearing X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 16 Content-Length: 0 X-Enswitch-RURI: sip:05xxxxxx@my_kamailio:5060;transport=udp X-Enswitch-Source: their_internals:5060 BYE sip:36d0a5cfbaeb6b055d5bb02c32127b49_32123456789@my_kamailio;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:05xxxxxx@my_kamailio;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Record-Route: <sip:their_sbc;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP my_kamailio;branch=z9hG4bK1ae8.b4f95af2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP my_kamailio;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1ae8.a4f95af2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP their_sbc;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1ae8.269e4f67.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP their_internals:5060;received=their_internals;branch=z9hG4bK4f9044a7;rport=5060 Route: <sip:their_sbc;lr=on;ftag=as5716fec8> Max-Forwards: 67 From: "Some_Telecom" <sip:02xxxxxxxx@their_sbc>;tag=as5716fec8 To: <sip:05xxxxxx@their_sbc:5060>;tag=U3FrFDm5Zr0KF Call-ID: 68fe6a470986bd087ce4ed860f603af6@their_sbc CSeq: 103 BYE User-Agent: Integrics Enswitch X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Normal Clearing X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 16 Content-Length: 0 X-Enswitch-RURI: sip:05xxxxxx@my_kamailio:5060;transport=udp X-Enswitch-Source: their_internals:5060

2 1

[OT] SIP on the Web
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 11 Oct '11

11 Oct '11

Hi folks, I would like to show a project my colleage José Luis Millán and me are working on. It's about SIP protocol running in a web browser. When RTCweb (media capable web browsers) becomes a reality both technologies together will allow real SIP endpoints coded in JavaScript running in a web browser and interoperating with real SIP networks. Bye bye Flash and custom protocol gateways. http://sip-on-the-web.aliax.net/ Cheers. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>

4 10

limiting concurrent calls with dialog module
by Uri Shacked 11 Oct '11

11 Oct '11

Hi, I am trying to create concurrent calls limitations. two questions: 1. should i use dialog module? or is there a better module? 2. i was trying to work with the dialog module, but didnt understand how and where to configure the commands and which to use.... any examples or ideas? BR, Uri

10 17

releasing v3.2.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 11 Oct '11

11 Oct '11

Hello, it is time to set the time to release v3.2.0. From my point of view, testing went very well, considering also that core and main modules were not touched much during this devel cycle, the most of the efforts were on new modules and application service components such as presence server, Lua ... A convenient date for me will be Tuesday, October 18, 2011, allowing to work a bit on packaging and docs. If there are other preferences, jump in this discussion. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

4 8

(no subject)
by alan chiu 10 Oct '11

10 Oct '11

http://toehugger.com/CRE/info.php?html143

1 0

Audio quality issue
by Austin Einter 10 Oct '11

10 Oct '11

Hi I am using Kamailio 3.1.5 . I am using RTP proxy also. I have used default kamailio.cfg.sample fiile , and just added line #!define WITH_NAT. I have another Main proxy. I wanted all my signalling and media packets should just pass through machine where Kamailio and RTP proxy are running. With this I found, call is established, all signalling and media packets are passing through kamailio / rtp-proxy. So far so good. One way audio stream (from called party to calling party) quality is good. The other audio stream (from calling party to called party is very bad. Did anybody face this issue? Please help me to sort out this issue audio quality issue. Regards Austin

4 5

Carrierroute: Could not allocate shared memory
by Mino Haluz 10 Oct '11

10 Oct '11

Hi, is there any setting which could allow me to set maximum memory per module ? As I am testing the carrier route module, I've added for testing purposes 100 000 rules sofar. When I start the kamailio, it gives me : Oct 10 14:46:46 kamrouter /usr/sbin/kamailio[2182]: ERROR: carrierroute [../../ut.h:702]: could not allocate shared memory from available pool Oct 10 14:46:46 kamrouter /usr/sbin/kamailio[2182]: ERROR: carrierroute [cr_rule.c:155]: could not allocate shared memory from available pool Thanks.

3 4

Memory Allocation in Kamailio
by Austin Einter 08 Oct '11

08 Oct '11

Hi Just a quick question. How memory is allocated in Kamailio code. Few places I saw pkg_malloc function. Is it the only function used to allocate memory or there are similar functions present in kamailio. Thanks Austin

3 2

tm and msilo module
by Mark Anthony C. Delfin 08 Oct '11

08 Oct '11

Dear List, I am trying to enable msilo on Kamailio but I'm getting an error ct 8 11:30:30 localhost kamailio[13856]: ERROR: tm [tm_load.c:48]: tm:load_tm: Module not initialized yet, make sure that all modules that need tm module are loaded after tm in the configuration file Oct 8 11:30:30 localhost kamailio[13856]: INFO: sl [sl.c:163]: could not bind tm module - only stateless mode available Oct 8 11:30:30 localhost kamailio[13856]: ERROR: tm [tm_load.c:48]: tm:load_tm: Module not initialized yet, make sure that all modules that need tm module are loaded after tm in the configuration file Oct 8 11:30:30 localhost kamailio[13856]: ERROR: msilo [msilo.c:333]: can't load TM API Oct 8 11:30:30 localhost kamailio[13856]: ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:875]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module msilo (/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/msilo.so) Any ideas how can I fixed it. Thank you in Advance. Regards, Mark Anthony C. Delfin

2 1

Kamailio RTP Proxy Questions
by Austin Einter 07 Oct '11

07 Oct '11

Hi I downloaded 3.1.5 Kamalio source, did make and install. Tried to run, and tested few basic scenarios, everything working fine. I have a main proxy, want to use kamailio as intermediate proxy and my requirement is all RTP packets should pass through machine in which Kamalio proxy is running. I beleive RTP Proxy I can run in same machine where Kamailio proxy is running with proper configuration . For this I am referring, http://nil.uniza.sk/sip/nat-fw/configuring-nat-traversal-using-kamailio-31-… page. In one of the steps it says "So, if we are using the Rtpproxy server with default configuration, we have to open /etc/default/rtpproxy file and uncomment following line regarding of udp socket, that will be sued for interconnection:". I tried to search rtpproxy configuration file, could not locate. While making and installing Kamalio proxy, the commands I used "make prefix=/usr/local/ all and make prefix=/usr/local/ install". Can somebody point me why rtpproxy config file is missing. Also the link I am refering to is correct or wrong one. Best Regards, Austin

2 6

Multiple INVITEs and discarded call_control
by Mino Haluz 07 Oct '11

07 Oct '11

Hi, my kamailio server is receiving from some customers 3 identical INVITEs when call is initiated (separated by 200ms). Those 3 INVITEs are making a big problem with call_control: WARNING: call_control [call_control.c:1156]: dialog to trace controlled call was not created. discarding callcontrol. That is why, the prepaid limit is not working at all in this case. This way the user can hack the prepaid protection of the account. Otherwise the call_control is fuilly functional. Anybody experienced the similar problem? If so, how to resolve it? Thanks, Mino Haluz

2 4

no more pkg mem on ul_dump
by Klaus Darilion 06 Oct '11

06 Oct '11

Hi! Kamailio 1.3.4: "kamctl ul monitor" causes: ERROR: <core> [attr.c:80]: no more pkg mem (21) ERROR: mi_fifo [fifo_fnc.c:513]: command (ul_dump) processing failed There are ~ 2000 entries in location table. Default PKG size is used. I remember there were some similar reports recently, but couldn't find the relevant threads. Any hints for the cause of this problem and workarounds? Thanks Klaus

4 8

Compiling on a 2.4 kernel
by Pedro Antonio Vico Solano 06 Oct '11

06 Oct '11

2 3

Problems with domain on registrations.
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 06 Oct '11

06 Oct '11

I have the current setup: SIP client <-> SER Proxy <-> SIP Trunk. My reason for the SER Proxy is that the SIP trunk only allows connections from approved IP addresses (such as my server with SER Proxy). My user on the SIP Trunk has the following authentication username@domain. I am able to register to the SIP Trunk as I'm setting up my SIP klient with username to username, domain to domain and then add my SER Proxy IP address as proxy. This works and means that I'm able to place calls to the SIP Trunk. BUT people cannot place calls from the SIP Trunk to my SIP client, due to the fact that on the SIP Trunk my locations is registered as username@SER-Procy-IP. So when people are calling me, the SER Proxy is looking for username@SER-Procy-IP and NOT username@domain, as I'm registered with. And then SER Proxy reports: 404 Not Found. Can anyone help me how to set this up correctly? I do not have access to the SIP Trunk, but I have all access to the SIP client and SIP Proxy.

2 2

Removing Contact from location table when TCP connection from UA is dropped...
by Krishna Kurapati 06 Oct '11

06 Oct '11

Hi, When UA connects with the Proxy over TCP, the contact is mostly bound to the firewall's binding IP and port for that connection. When the connection is dropped, the contact in Kamailio is no longer valid even though there is time left to expire the contact. Is there some way to link TCP connection and the contact in such a way that when TCP connection is dropped, contact from the location can be removed? Thanks Krish Kura

2 1

New in Kamailio
by Leonardo Sena 05 Oct '11

05 Oct '11

Hello I´m a new contribuitor of the list and my english dont very good then i hope of help more in the future I am installing Kamailio and Siremis but i dont understand like siremis works and where i can create the routes i would like step by step to routes rules. Best Regards, Leonardo Sena

1 0

Balancing incoming traffic (DID)
by Anto 05 Oct '11

05 Oct '11

Hello It presents a problem because I do not know how to assimilate the implementation. Until now we had a design of a proxy to balance out between several gateway, but it will add another proxy for another service (other users) and use the same gateway output or perhaps different (although not that be better if divide or unify the gateway). The problem as I have with the routing entry, which is not very well how to implement it. Now we have the design like this: -GW ----\ / - CARRIER1 USER ------ KAMAILIO ----- GW ---- + \ - CARRIER2 -GW ----/ And becomes like this: -GW ----\ / - CARRIER1 USER ------ KAMAILIOSERVICE1 ----- GW ---- + \ - CARRIER2 -GW ----/ -GW ----\ / - CARRIER1 USER ------ KAMAILIOSERVICE2 ----- GW ---- + \ - CARRIER2 -GW ----/ Or maybe using the same gateway. The problem is that each carrier provides DID number (I use the same for both services). Kamailio had thought to put a gateway between the carriers and that they did check the service and send it to the corresponding gateway (in the case of the gateway separately), or put it in the proxy gateway and making checking for routing to proxy (in the case of using the same gateway). What would be better? Any recommendations on how to put this into practice?. The biggest question that I believe is the routing table, as if this new proxy routes the traffic into and leaves her in the field via ip, also pass through the output data (I have doubts whether SIP level, following standard, you can not pass through the exit) and want it to be direct (USER -> Proxy -> GW -> CARRIER), just past the entrance. Anyone could advise me where I could find more information to set up this scenario?. thanks and sorry for bothering you with this question ;-). best regards

2 2

limiting concurrent calls with dialog module
by Uri Shacked 05 Oct '11

05 Oct '11

Hi, Thanks for the help. The idea of using SQLOPS for many things crossed my mind.... But....I am using ACC with DB, Dialog with DB and so... isnt it too much? i mean for load and capacity reasons? BR, Uri

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog ref Error
by Uri Shacked 05 Oct '11

05 Oct '11

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote: > OK... > now i see the problem is some where in the cfg file... > i get te following error : > > 0(3774) : <core> [cfg.y:3406]: parse error in config file > //etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, from line 944, column 2 to line 945, column 0: > syntax error > 0(3774) : <core> [cfg.y:3406]: parse error in config file > //etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, from line 944, column 2 to line 945, column 0: > bad command > ERROR: bad config file (2 errors) > 0(3774) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:122]: DEBUG: tm_shutdown : start > 0(3774) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:125]: DEBUG: tm_shutdown : emptying hash > table > 0(3774) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:127]: DEBUG: tm_shutdown : removing > semaphores > 0(3774) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:129]: DEBUG: tm_shutdown : destroying tmcb > lists > 0(3774) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:132]: DEBUG: tm_shutdown : done > 0(3774) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:236]: shm_mem_destroy > 0(3774) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:239]: destroying the shared memory > lock > > > here is my complete cfg file. > any ideas? > > > ... > > ######## Routing Logic ######## > > # Main SIP request routing logic > > # - processing of any incoming SIP request starts with this route > > route { > > setflag(FLT_TRC); # Trace message > > # per request initial checks > > route(REQINIT); > > # NAT detection > > route(NAT); > > # handle requests within SIP dialogs > > route(WITHINDLG); > > ### only initial requests (no To tag) > > # CANCEL processing > > if (is_method("CANCEL")) > > { > > if (t_check_trans()) > > t_relay(); > > exit; > > } > > t_check_trans(); > > # authentication > > route(AUTH); > > # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) > > # - remove preloaded route headers > > remove_hf("Route"); > > if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) > > record_route(); > > # account only INVITEs > > if (is_method("INVITE")) > > { > > #!ifdef WITH_DIALPLAN > > dp_translate("1", "$rU/$rU"); > > xlog("translated to $rU \n"); > > #!endif > > #!ifdef WITH_CARRIERROUTE > > ####cr_user_carrier("$rU", "$td", "$avp(carrierid)"); > > ####xlog("translated to var $avp(carrierid) \n"); > > cr_route("OSP1", "kamailio2", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id"); > > #!endif > > setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting > > } > > # dispatch requests to foreign domains > > route(SIPOUT); > > ### requests for my local domains > > # handle presence related requests > > route(PRESENCE); > > # handle registrations > > route(REGISTRAR); > > if ($rU==$null) > > { > > # request with no Username in RURI > > sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); > > exit; > > } > > # dispatch destinations to PSTN > > route(PSTN); > > # user location service > > route(LOCATION); > > route(RELAY); > > } > > route[RELAY] { > > #!ifdef WITH_NAT > > if (check_route_param("nat=yes")) { > > setbflag(FLB_NATB); > > } > > if (isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { > > route(RTPPROXY); > > } > > #!endif > > /* example how to enable some additional event routes */ > > if (is_method("INVITE")) { > > #t_on_branch("BRANCH_ONE"); > > t_on_reply("REPLY_ONE"); > > t_on_failure("FAIL_ONE"); > > } > > if (!t_relay()) { > > sl_reply_error(); > > } > > exit; > > } > > # Per SIP request initial checks > > route[REQINIT] { > > #!ifdef WITH_ANTIFLOOD > > # flood dection from same IP and traffic ban for a while > > # be sure you exclude checking trusted peers, such as pstn gateways > > # - local host excluded (e.g., loop to self) > > if(src_ip!=myself) > > { > > if($sht(ipban=>$si)!=$null) > > { > > # ip is already blocked > > xdbg("request from blocked IP - $rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); > > exit; > > } > > if (!pike_check_req()) > > { > > xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: pike blocking $rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); > > $sht(ipban=>$si) = 1; > > exit; > > } > > } > > #!endif > > if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { > > sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); > > exit; > > } > > if(!sanity_check("1511", "7")) > > { > > xlog("Malformed SIP message from $si:$sp\n"); > > exit; > > } > > #!ifdef WITH_PIPELIMIT > > # perform pipe match for INVITE method > > if (is_method("INVITE")) { > > if (!pl_check("avg")) { > > pl_drop(); > > exit; > > } > > if (!pl_check("peek")) { > > pl_drop(); > > exit; > > } > > #endif > > #!ifdef WITH_DIALOG > > xlog("currently active dialogs are $DLG_count\n"); > > dlg_manage(); > > dlg_setflag(FLT_DLG); > > if (is_method("INVITE")) { > > $var(size) = 0; > > get_profile_size("test","$rU","$var(size)"); > > xlog("currently, the user $rU has $var(size) active calls\n"); > > if( $var(size) >= 5 ) > > { > > sl_send_reply("507", "Simultaneous calls limit reached"); > > xlog("Limit of $var(size) active calls has been reached \n"); > > exit; > > } > > set_dlg_profile("test","$rU"); > > } > > #!endif > > } > > # Handle requests within SIP dialogs > > route[WITHINDLG] { > > if (has_totag()) { > > # sequential request withing a dialog should > > # take the path determined by record-routing > > if (loose_route()) { > > if (is_method("BYE")) { > > setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... > > setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails > > } > > route(RELAY); > > } else { > > if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) { > > # in-dialog subscribe requests > > route(PRESENCE); > > exit; > > } > > if ( is_method("ACK") ) { > > if ( t_check_trans() ) { > > # no loose-route, but stateful ACK; > > # must be an ACK after a 487 > > # or e.g. 404 from upstream server > > t_relay(); > > exit; > > } else { > > # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard > > exit; > > } > > } > > sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); > > } > > exit; > > } > > } > > # Handle SIP registrations > > route[REGISTRAR] { > > if (is_method("REGISTER")) > > { > > if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) > > { > > setbflag(FLB_NATB); > > # uncomment next line to do SIP NAT pinging > > ## setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING); > > } > > if (!save("location")) > > sl_reply_error(); > > exit; > > } > > } > > # USER location service > > route[LOCATION] { > > #!ifdef WITH_ALIASDB > > # search in DB-based aliases > > alias_db_lookup("dbaliases"); > > #!endif > > if (!lookup("location")) { > > switch ($rc) { > > case -1: > > case -3: > > t_newtran(); > > t_reply("404", "Not Found"); > > exit; > > case -2: > > sl_send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); > > exit; > > } > > } > > # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also > > if (is_method("INVITE")) > > { > > setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED); > > } > > } > > # Presence server route > > route[PRESENCE] { > > if(!is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")) > > return; > > #!ifdef WITH_PRESENCE > > if (!t_newtran()) > > { > > sl_reply_error(); > > exit; > > }; > > if(is_method("PUBLISH")) > > { > > handle_publish(); > > t_release(); > > } > > else > > if( is_method("SUBSCRIBE")) > > { > > handle_subscribe(); > > t_release(); > > } > > exit; > > #!endif > > # if presence enabled, this part will not be executed > > if (is_method("PUBLISH") || $rU==$null) > > { > > sl_send_reply("404", "Not here"); > > exit; > > } > > return; > > } > > # Authentication route > > route[AUTH] { > > #!ifdef WITH_AUTH > > if (is_method("REGISTER")) > > { > > # authenticate the REGISTER requests (uncomment to enable auth) > > if (!www_authorize("$td", "subscriber")) > > { > > www_challenge("$td", "0"); > > exit; > > } > > if ($au!=$tU) > > { > > sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); > > exit; > > } > > } else { > > #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH > > if(allow_source_address()) > > { > > # source IP allowed > > return; > > } > > #!endif > > # authenticate if from local subscriber > > if (from_uri==myself) > > { > > if (!proxy_authorize("$fd", "subscriber")) { > > proxy_challenge("$fd", "0"); > > exit; > > } > > if (is_method("PUBLISH")) > > { > > if ($au!=$tU) { > > sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); > > exit; > > } > > } else { > > if ($au!=$fU) { > > sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); > > exit; > > } > > } > > consume_credentials(); > > # caller authenticated > > } else { > > # caller is not local subscriber, then check if it calls > > # a local destination, otherwise deny, not an open relay here > > if (!uri==myself) > > { > > sl_send_reply("403","Not relaying"); > > exit; > > } > > } > > } > > #!endif > > return; > > } > > # Caller NAT detection route > > route[NAT] { > > #!ifdef WITH_NAT > > force_rport(); > > if (nat_uac_test("19")) { > > if (method=="REGISTER") { > > fix_nated_register(); > > } else { > > fix_nated_contact(); > > } > > setflag(FLT_NATS); > > } > > #!endif > > return; > > } > > # RTPProxy control > > route[RTPPROXY] { > > #!ifdef WITH_NAT > > if (is_method("BYE")) { > > unforce_rtp_proxy(); > > } else if (is_method("INVITE")){ > > force_rtp_proxy(); > > } > > if (!has_totag()) add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); > > #!endif > > return; > > } > > # Routing to foreign domains > > route[SIPOUT] { > > if (!uri==myself) > > { > > append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); > > route(RELAY); > > } > > } > > # PSTN GW routing > > route[PSTN] { > > #!ifdef WITH_PSTN > > # check if PSTN GW IP is defined > > if (strempty($sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_ip))) { > > xlog("SCRIPT: PSTN rotuing enabled but pstn.gw_ip not defined\n"); > > return; > > } > > # route to PSTN dialed numbers starting with '+' or '00' > > # (international format) > > # - update the condition to match your dialing rules for PSTN routing > > if(!($rU=~"^(\+|00)[1-9][0-9]{3,20}$")) > > return; > > # only local users allowed to call > > if(from_uri!=myself) { > > sl_send_reply("403", "Not Allowed"); > > exit; > > } > > $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_ip); > > route(RELAY); > > exit; > > #!endif > > return; > > } > > # XMLRPC routing > > #!ifdef WITH_XMLRPC > > route[XMLRPC] > > { > > # allow XMLRPC from localhost > > if ((method=="POST" || method=="GET") > > && (src_ip==127.0.0.1)) { > > # close connection only for xmlrpclib user agents (there is a bug in > > # xmlrpclib: it waits for EOF before interpreting the response). > > if ($hdr(User-Agent) =~ "xmlrpclib") > > set_reply_close(); > > set_reply_no_connect(); > > dispatch_rpc(); > > exit; > > } > > send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); > > exit; > > } > > #!endif > > # Sample branch router > > branch_route[BRANCH_ONE] { > > xdbg("new branch at $ru\n"); > > } > > # Sample onreply route > > onreply_route[REPLY_ONE] { > > xdbg("incoming reply\n"); > > #!ifdef WITH_NAT > > if ((isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) > > && status=~"(183)|(2[0-9][0-9])") { > > force_rtp_proxy(); > > } > > if (isbflagset("6")) { > > fix_nated_contact(); > > } > > #!endif > > } > > route[STATS] { > > sql_query("ca", > > "insert into statistics (time_stamp,shm_used_size,shm_real_used_size," > > "shm_max_used_size,shm_free_used_size,ul_users,ul_contacts) values ($Ts," > > "$stat(used_size),$stat(real_used_size),$stat(max_used_size)," > > "$stat(free_size),$stat(location-users),$stat(location-contacts))", > > "ra"); > > } > > # Sample failure route > > failure_route[FAIL_ONE] { > > #!ifdef WITH_NAT > > if (is_method("INVITE") > > && (isbflagset(FLB_NATB) || isflagset(FLT_NATS))) { > > unforce_rtp_proxy(); > > } > > #!endif > > if (t_is_canceled()) { > > exit; > > } > > # uncomment the following lines if you want to block client > > # redirect based on 3xx replies. > > ##if (t_check_status("3[0-9][0-9]")) { > > ##t_reply("404","Not found"); > > ## exit; > > ##} > > # uncomment the following lines if you want to redirect the failed > > # calls to a different new destination > > ##if (t_check_status("486|408")) { > > ## sethostport("192.168.2.100:5060"); > > ## append_branch(); > > ## # do not set the missed call flag again > > ## t_relay(); > > ##} > > } > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Uri Shacked <ushacked(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:48 AM >> Subject: dialog ref Error >> To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> >> >> Hi, >> >> i keep on getting this error: >> Oct 5 14:39:33 Kamailio2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[21568]: DEBUG: dialog >> [dlg_hash.c:247]: new dialog on hash 531 >> Oct 5 14:39:33 Kamailio2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[21568]: DEBUG: dialog >> [dlg_handlers.c:264]: route_set , contact sip:036264529@10.2.0.55:5061, >> cseq 1 and bind_addr udp:10.2.0.5:5060 >> Oct 5 14:39:33 Kamailio2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[21568]: DEBUG: dialog >> [dlg_hash.c:519]: ref dlg 0xb417f5a0 with 3 -> 3 >> Oct 5 14:39:33 Kamailio2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[21568]: DEBUG: dialog >> [dlg_hash.c:600]: unref dlg 0xb417f5a0 with 1, crt ref count: 3 >> >> anyone knows what it is? >> >> here is the dialog part in my cfg: >> >> >> *# ------ dialog params --------* >> >> modparam("dialog", "db_url", DBURL) >> >> ##modparam("dialog", "rr_param", "did") >> >> modparam("dialog", "default_timeout", 7200) >> >> modparam("dialog", "dlg_match_mode", >> 0) >> >> modparam("dialog", "detect_spirals", 1) >> >> modparam("dialog", "db_mode", 1) >> >> ##modparam("dialog", "db_fetch_rows", 100) >> >> modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", FLT_DLG) >> >> modparam("dialog", "profiles_with_value", "test") >> >> >> >> .......... >> >> dlg_manage(); >> >> ##dlg_setflag(FLT_DLG); >> >> if (is_method("INVITE")) { >> >> $var(size) = 0; >> >> get_profile_size("test","$rU","$var(size)"); >> >> xlog("currently, the user $rU has $var(size) active calls\n"); >> >> if( $var(size) >= 5 ){ >> >> sl_send_reply("507", "Simultaneous calls limit reached"); >> >> xlog("Limit of $var(size) active calls has been reached \n"); >> >> exit;} >> >> set_dlg_profile("test","$rU");} >> >> ........ >> >> >

2 1

Dialog ref Error
by Uri Shacked 05 Oct '11

05 Oct '11

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Uri Shacked <uri.shacked(a)gmail.com> Date: Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 11:48 AM Subject: dialog ref Error To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Hi, i keep on getting this error: Oct 5 14:39:33 Kamailio2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[21568]: DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:247]: new dialog on hash 531 Oct 5 14:39:33 Kamailio2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[21568]: DEBUG: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:264]: route_set , contact sip:036264529@10.2.0.55:5061, cseq 1 and bind_addr udp:10.2.0.5:5060 Oct 5 14:39:33 Kamailio2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[21568]: DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:519]: ref dlg 0xb417f5a0 with 3 -> 3 Oct 5 14:39:33 Kamailio2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[21568]: DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:600]: unref dlg 0xb417f5a0 with 1, crt ref count: 3 anyone knows what it is? here is the dialog part in my cfg: *# ------ dialog params --------* modparam("dialog", "db_url", DBURL) ##modparam("dialog", "rr_param", "did") modparam("dialog", "default_timeout", 7200) modparam("dialog", "dlg_match_mode", 0) modparam("dialog", "detect_spirals", 1) modparam("dialog", "db_mode", 1) ##modparam("dialog", "db_fetch_rows", 100) modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", FLT_DLG) modparam("dialog", "profiles_with_value", "test") .......... dlg_manage(); ##dlg_setflag(FLT_DLG); if (is_method("INVITE")) { $var(size) = 0; get_profile_size("test","$rU","$var(size)"); xlog("currently, the user $rU has $var(size) active calls\n"); if( $var(size) >= 5 ){ sl_send_reply("507", "Simultaneous calls limit reached"); xlog("Limit of $var(size) active calls has been reached \n"); exit;} set_dlg_profile("test","$rU");} ........

2 1

kamailio sip-capture error on compile
by Jeff Anderson 05 Oct '11

05 Oct '11

I am trying to get kamailio sip-capture up and running for use with homer. I can get the service to start but i receive the following error. [root@homer kamailio]# /usr/local/sbin/kamailio -c loading modules under /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules/ 0(10208) WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:912]: WARNING: fix_hostname: could not rev. resolve 10.40.0.22 Listening on udp: 10.40.0.22:5060 Aliases: config file ok, exiting... [root@homer kamailio]# kamctl start INFO: Starting Kamailio : INFO: started (pid: 10226) [root@homer kamailio]# [root@homer kamailio]# tail -f /var/log/messages Oct 3 05:30:17 homer /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1554]: NOTICE: <core> [main.c:704]: Thank you for flying kamailio Oct 3 05:30:32 homer kamailio: WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:912]: WARNING: fix_hostname: could not rev. resolve 10.40.0.22 Oct 3 05:31:59 homer kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Oct 3 05:32:47 homer kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode Oct 3 05:52:10 homer /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1753]: NOTICE: <core> [main.c:704]: Thank you for flying kamailio Oct 3 05:52:12 homer kamailio: WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:912]: WARNING: fix_hostname: could not rev. resolve 10.40.0.22 Oct 3 05:55:35 homer kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Oct 3 05:57:46 homer kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode Oct 3 07:05:35 homer /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[1894]: NOTICE: <core> [main.c:704]: Thank you for flying kamailio Oct 3 07:18:43 homer kamailio: WARNING: <core> [socket_info.c:912]: WARNING: fix_hostname: could not rev. resolve 10.40.0.22 ^C [root@homer kamailio]# Does anyone have any ideas on how to resolve this error? Thanks, Jeff Anderson

3 3

Installing Versign Intermediate CA Certificate In Kamailio 3.1.5
by arif tuhin 05 Oct '11

05 Oct '11

I've got trial certificate from verisign. They signed the server certificate with an intermediate ca and gave instructions for installing it into apache/IIS etc. Both issued certificate and the intermediate CA should be installed in the server. if only server certificate is installed , it will not be trusted by default. Now problem is in apache mod_ssl there is a field called ServerChainFile where the intermediate ca name should be in place, but in the tls module documentation, i find no place for intermediate ca. How should i install the intermediate ca the? Thanks in advance.

1 0

db_text
by Bruno Bresciani 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

Hello ALL, Someone knows why at line 149 in .../kamailio-3.1.2/modules_k/ db_text/dbt_tb.c the shm_malloc function sometimes allocates memory to dtp->prev but sometimes doesn't? I'm asking this question because when the subscriber table is being loading to shared memory in db_text module, dtp->prev is allocated but on version, dispatcher, location table it doesn't... Analysing the source code I can't see any reason to this behavior. The allocation of dtp->prev to subscriber table is generating a core at db_text module. Best Regards

2 5

Siremis CDR problems
by Klaus Darilion 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

Hi! When populating cdrs table from timer route I get some errors: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:120]: driver error on query: Duplicate entry '088827BCD0738B6F(a)111.11.111.11-00E0F510042319395872000014D3-6ADB' for key 2 ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:130]: error while submitting query ERROR: sqlops [sql_api.c:217]: cannot do the query Checking the acc table for those key I found the entries in the attachment. Maybe it be that the stored procedure can not handle PRACK or reINVITEs correctly? Thanks Klaus

2 3

new wiki system
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

Hello, I installed a new wiki site, targeting to collect documentation for upcoming v3.2.0 and further releases. You can find it at: * http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/ Hopefully, it will make the process of updating/migrating the relevant documentation from old wiki (http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/) straightforward and offer a clean reference for upcoming stable version. Old wiki is in place since 2005, collected a lot of pages, but many are for very old versions of kamailio, making difficult, at least for new comers, to sort out documentation for latest stable. All of you are invited to help with this process of adding documentation for 3.2.0 on the new wiki. The old wiki will stay in place, it will not be removed. Both are based on Dokuwiki, using different themes. The new one is at the beginning, so no much content in there yet, but by the time of releasing 3.2.0, should contain sufficient documentation for get started with that version. One very demanded thing was the alphabetic index for parameters, functions and mi commands from modules. This page contains new generated indexes for version 3.2.0. More details in a separate email. If you have questions about the new wiki, don't know where to place some tutorial, feel free to ask on mailing lists. Ultimately, pages can be relocated, but try to use namespaces for related topics. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

3 4

dispatcher, LCR, carrierroute or mtree?
by Skyler 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

Hi all, I need to setup an inbound DID router for 8 proxies and ~300 DID's. Very simple, a call comes in from pstn > kamailio looks up DID for exact match in mysql > returns location > If db result returns noservice redirect to 1.2.3.4 else remain in call-flow and send to destination. Having a failure route capability would be nice. From what I've read on each of the 4 modules, any could do what I need though each have their own complexities. I'm still new to kamailio and hoping to utilize the group here for some advice. I'd like to keep this as simple as possible then adding/deleting DID's from the db as needed for routing. In your experience which would be the best module to use in order to achieve my goal? TIA, Skyler

4 5

Trouble Setting up Kamailio
by Peter Schrock 04 Oct '11

04 Oct '11

I am using the site: http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:kamailio-3.1.x-from-git to load up Kamailio on my ppc using Leopard X. I managed to figure out the mysql issue and got it to install, but now there are some variances to the instruction from the stated install site and I am kind of lost. If I could get some help with the following - "7. Create MySQL database" This whole section seems confusing. It doesn't say what I am suppose to look for. I am sure what it says is all you need to do, but I am not sure if it is completed correctly or not. - "8. Edit configuration file" This section could use more specific information as to how to set up the configuration file. - "9. The init.d script" This section says I am suppose to put "*kamailio.init*" in the directory "*/etc/init.d*", then I am suppose chmod after it is copied. First of, I don't have that directory, am I suppose to create it or is it suppose to be created already? Also, it says to "*adduser*" with some options. Every time I try, I get the error message that it doesn't recognize the "*adduser*" command. Please help Peter

2 1

New to Kamailio - make problem
by Peter Schrock 03 Oct '11

03 Oct '11

I can't seem to get kamailio to "*make*". I am following the directions on the wiki on how to install. I have downloaded, compiled, and installed mysql server and every time I run to "*make all*" with kamailio, I get this error message. At first, I was thinking that *km_db_mysql.c* couldn't find the file. The header seems to be looking for *mysql.h* (at *#include <mysql/mysql.h>*). I found the file from installing mysql server and I thought I'd help * km_db_mysql.c* to find the file, but it still gives me this error. I am using a power pc running OS X.5.1. CC (gcc) [M db_mysql.so] km_db_mysql.o km_db_mysql.c:49:19: error: mysql/mysql.h: No such file or directory km_db_mysql.c: In function ‘kam_mysql_mod_init’: km_db_mysql.c:92: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘mysql_get_client_info’ km_db_mysql.c:92: warning: format ‘%s’ expects type ‘char *’, but argument 7 has type ‘int’ km_db_mysql.c:92: warning: format ‘%s’ expects type ‘char *’, but argument 6 has type ‘int’ make[1]: *** [km_db_mysql.o] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 1 Peter Schrock

3 3

Combining Dispatcher and NAT_Helper modules.
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 03 Oct '11

03 Oct '11

I'm currently having a Kamailio running as load balancer, at it works most of the time. But sometimes fails due to NAT issues. This is my config: http://pastebin.com/8F8X45xh Can someone help me combine the NAT_Helper module into this config? It's not the variables to set or RTPProxy, but in the Routing Logic.

1 0

Incoming calls question
by Javier Vidal -- Quasar 03 Oct '11

03 Oct '11

i have a question, i have to make a system to recieve several calls and the same time, and depending of destination DDI i have to rewrite the URI's IP. I am not going to have Registered users, only IP validation. The question is: What is the better way to consult thousands DDIs and get the IP from mysql? I had thought, use sqlops.so module, but i think that i could have problems with it. Another posibility is use the carrierroute and use the full pattern for the DDI. Thank for all sugestions. Javier V.

2 2

alphabetic indexes for module parameters, functions, ...
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 03 Oct '11

03 Oct '11

Hello, for the last versions the alphabetic indexes were not generated - there were different people doing that in the past, using various self-written tools. For upcoming version, 3.2.0, I spend some time to structure the docbook files for modules in order to be easier to get from them the names for functions, parameters and mi commands. Therefore, the new wiki system has fresh generated indexes from modules' documentations. You can find them at: * http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/alphaindexes:3.2.x:modparameters * http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/alphaindexes:3.2.x:modfunctions * http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/alphaindexes:3.2.x:micommands Being generated from docbook xml files, the indexes contain name, path to the module in source tree and module name, the last one with link to html readme file of the module published to kamailio.org site. There is no link at the moment pointing inside the html readmes to the place where the item is documented, but each readme has table of content, so it is easy to spot it. We have lots lots of modules right now, therefore it was not easy to check if some parameters, functions or mi commands were not indexed. If you find some missing, please write back here so we can fix the dockbook or the indexing tool, depending where the problem is. Hope the indexes will be helpful for many of you. Ending the email with another invitation to all of you to port (update to upcoming v3.2.0) your favorite tutorial from old wiki system (http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/) and add to the new wiki (http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/). Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Cflag is not getting updated.
by Krishna Kurapati 03 Oct '11

03 Oct '11

Hi, I am hitting bit of a wall here. - I am setting bflags for NAT, and SIPPING before save("location") however, when I do "kamctl ul show", the Cflag is 0. I also checked see if the bflags are set or not in the register routine - they are being set. What am I missing? snippets of the config files. #!define FLB_NATB 6 #!define FLB_NATSIPPING 7 modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_bflag", FLB_NATSIPPING) modparam("nathelper", "sipping_method", "INFO") modparam("nathelper", "sipping_from", "sip:pinger@50.62.1.7") # params needed for NAT traversal in other modules modparam("nathelper|registrar|usrloc", "received_avp", "$avp(RECEIVED)") modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", FLB_NATB) # Caller NAT detection route route[NAT] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT force_rport(); if (nat_uac_test("19")) { if (method=="REGISTER") { fix_nated_register(); } else { fix_nated_contact(); } setflag(FLT_NATS); setbflag(FLB_NATB); } #!endif return; } # Handle SIP registrations route[REGISTRAR] { if (is_method("REGISTER")) { xlog("L_ALERT", "REGISTER: From $fU, $fd To $tU, $td"); if (isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); # uncomment next line to do SIP NAT pinging setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING); } # 7/28/11 - make sure only one contact location is active # at any given time # unregister("location", "$rU"); if (isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { xlog("L_ALERT", "REGISTRAR: For $fU, $fd FLB_NATB set"); } if (isbflagset(FLB_NATSIPPING)) { xlog("L_ALERT", "REGISTRAR: For $fU, $fd FLB_NATSIPPING set"); } if (!save("location")) { xlog("L_ALERT", "REGISTRAR: From $fU, $fd Location could not be saved"); sl_reply_error(); } exit; } } The debug log snippets ================== Oct 1 15:58:30 siptest /usr/sbin/kamailio[19515]: ALERT: <script>: REGISTER: From p_krishna_test_com, 50.62.1.7 To p_krishna_test_com, 50.62.1.7 Oct 1 15:58:30 siptest /usr/sbin/kamailio[19515]: ALERT: <script>: REGISTRAR: For p_krishna_test_com, 50.62.1.7 FLB_NATB set Oct 1 15:58:30 siptest /usr/sbin/kamailio[19515]: ALERT: <script>: REGISTRAR: For p_krishna_test_com, 50.62.1.7 FLB_NATSIPPING set Oct 1 15:58:30 siptest /usr/sbin/kamailio[19515]: DEBUG: sl [sl.c:278]: reply in stateless mode (sl) Output of kamctl command ==================== $ sudo kamctl ul show Domain:: location table=512 records=1 max_slot=1 AOR:: p_krishna_test_com Contact:: sip:p_krishna_test_com@75.62.17.45:50073;transport=tcp;ob Q= Expires:: 287 Callid:: ad2d3a7bf39a4345861db1661576a7f3 Cseq:: 54856 User-agent:: QliqDesktop 1.0.0 (pjproject 1.10.0/win32) State:: CS_NEW Flags:: 0 Cflag:: 0 <================= Cflag is not being set. Socket:: tcp:10.1.0.6:5060 Methods:: 8143 Thanks Krish Kura

1 3

Kamailio as dispatcher fails due to from domain on extension.
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 02 Oct '11

02 Oct '11

I'm using Kamailio as dispatcher to a FreeSwitch setup. Currently it "almost" work. I have 2 extensions connected to my FreeSwitch via Kamailio. However, I can only send calls one way because Kamailio seems to change the domain on the extension. One extension is registered with ID(a)sip.my-domain.com. This I can send calls to. The other extension is registered with ID@local-ip. This I cannot send calls to. Isn't it possible to have Kamailio register the extension on my FreeSwitch with @sip.my-domain.com? If I register both extension directly to my FreeSwitch everything works.

3 5

Re: [SR-Users] Setting avp from load_credentials
by Alex Balashov 01 Oct '11

01 Oct '11

Alternately, if you dislike any of these paradigms or find the order of operations inconvenient, just roll your own. That's what sqlops is for. -- This message was painstakingly thumbed out on my mobile, so apologies for brevity, errors, and general sloppiness. Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 260 Peachtree Street NW Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ On Oct 1, 2011, at 10:43 AM, "graham(a)g-rock.net" <graham(a)g-rock.net> wrote: > I know I am Auth'ing users, but apparently need to confirm the location of www_authorize. Thanks for the pointers Alex. > > Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint! > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Alex Balashov" <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> > Date: Sat, Oct 1, 2011 9:07 am > Subject: [SR-Users] Setting avp from load_credentials > To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> > > Sure it is, but credentials only get loaded if you are doing proxy/www_authorize() beforehand. Are you? > > -- > This message was painstakingly thumbed out on my mobile, so apologies for brevity, errors, and general sloppiness. > > Alex Balashov - Principal > Evariste Systems LLC > 260 Peachtree Street NW > Suite 2200 > Atlanta, GA 30303 > Tel: +1-678-954-0670 > Fax: +1-404-961-1892 > Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ > > On Oct 1, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Graham Wooden <graham(a)g-rock.net> wrote: > > > Hi there, > > > > Just doing a quick test and this doesn’t appear to be working. Kamailio > > 1.5.5-notls. Snippet of code: > > > > modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "username") > > . > > . > > . > > xlog("username is $avp(s:username)\n"); > > > > > > The result is '<null>'. Is this not available in the route{} ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -graham > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] Setting avp from load_credentials
by graham＠g-rock.net 01 Oct '11

01 Oct '11

I know I am Auth'ing users, but apparently need to confirm the location of www_authorize. Thanks for the pointers Alex. Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint! ----- Reply message ----- From: "Alex Balashov" <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> Date: Sat, Oct 1, 2011 9:07 am Subject: [SR-Users] Setting avp from load_credentials To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) -Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sure it is, but credentials only get loaded if you are doing proxy/www_authorize() beforehand. Are you? -- This message was painstakingly thumbed out on my mobile, so apologies for brevity, errors, and general sloppiness. Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 260 Peachtree Street NW Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ On Oct 1, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Graham Wooden <graham(a)g-rock.net> wrote: > Hi there, > > Just doing a quick test and this doesn’t appear to be working. Kamailio > 1.5.5-notls. Snippet of code: > > modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "username") > . > . > . > xlog("username is $avp(s:username)\n"); > > > The result is '<null>'. Is this not available in the route{} ? > > Thanks, > > -graham > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

1 0

Setting avp from load_credentials
by Graham Wooden 01 Oct '11

01 Oct '11

Hi there, Just doing a quick test and this doesn¹t appear to be working. Kamailio 1.5.5-notls. Snippet of code: modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "username") . . . xlog("username is $avp(s:username)\n"); The result is '<null>'. Is this not available in the route{} ? Thanks, -graham

2 1

Use of $rU
by Graham Wooden 01 Oct '11

01 Oct '11

Hi there, What is pv for the equivalent of $rU for outbound? My inbound use of $rU has the correct username. All my subscribers are multi-number trunks, so on the outbound I need to associate the subscriber. This is kamailio 1.5. Thanks, -graham

2 3

Handling quota/call limits - kamailio 1.5
by Graham Wooden 01 Oct '11

01 Oct '11

Hi there, Finally getting around to introducing some call limits and starting with the inbound calls. However, I ran into an issue about how to get the "in use" count to be updated in my quota table. What is the best way to get s:in_use to update so it can be calculated? Here is my snippet of code: if (is_method("INVITE")) { avp_db_query("select quota, in_use from quota where username='$rU'","$avp(s:quota);$avp(s:in_use)"); if ($avp(s:in_use) >= $avp(s:quota)){ xlog ("DEBUG: Trunk $rU is over quota"); sl_send_reply("503","User over quota"); } . . } This opens up two more questions: How to decrease the call count when a BYE is received - maybe do a subtraction and the do a avp_db_query to update the table? And of course there is the BYE that won't be present (ie. When a call just rings and hangs up before it gets answered). Maybe ACC's missed_calls can somewhat be used to help determine? Thanks for any pointers and guidance. I am running Kamailio 1.5. Thanks, -graham

2 4

SNMPStats and multiple proxies
by Antanas Masevicius 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

Hello, been trying to run two sip-router proxies in parallel and to feed data from them to snmpd via agentx. But it looks like snmpd deamon directly routes snmp request just to one (probably first connected) proxy. What ways this can be solved? Currenly i am thinking like running two concurrent snmpd daemons binded to specific IP addresses. Is there a better way to do it? best regards, -- Antanas Masevicius

4 6

Re: [SR-Users] Making iPhone SIP client work with Kamailio
by Krishna Kurapati 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

> > Hi, > > The iPhone client, when it goes into background, can only respond to > incoming messages. > That makes the Registration expire when there is no communication from the > server before > the expire time. I could make the Registration not expire at all. Not sure > it's the only option. > > Is there a way to send a Ping message from server periodically to the > iPhone SIP client. This > will wakeup the SIP client and resend REGISTER message. > > Thanks > Krish Kura >

2 2

Cleaning up presence info when user is deleted
by Krishna Kurapati 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

Hi, When a user is removed using "kamctl rm", is there way way to clean up presence information in the database (xcap, presentity, watcher and active watcher tables) and in the cache? Is there a event that gets fired when the user is removed from subscriber table which I could handle in config file and and cleanup? Thanks Krish Kura

3 3

Core db_text module
by Bruno Bresciani 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

Hi All, Kamailio 3.1.2 generate a core in db_text module when subscriber table is updated and after this action some SIP message require authentication process... Someone Can Help me to understand why this core is happening? Below is part of kamailio's trace and gdb core too. Kamailio's trace: *Sep 22 16:35:54 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2327]: DEBUG: auth_db [authorize.c:239]: realm value [192.168.166.199]* Sep 22 16:35:54 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2327]: DEBUG: auth [api.c:95]: auth: digest-algo: MD5 parsed value: 1 *Sep 22 16:35:54 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2327]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_file.c:78]: [subscriber] was updated* Sep 22 16:35:54 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2324]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:741]: child process 2327 exited by a signal 11 Sep 22 16:35:54 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2324]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:744]: core was generated Sep 22 16:35:54 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2324]: INFO: <core> [main.c:756]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD Sep 22 16:35:54 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2335]: INFO: <core> [main.c:807]: INFO: signal 15 received c Sep 22 16:35:54 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[2335]: DEBUG: <core> [main.c:818]: Memory status (pkg): gdb core trace: Core was generated by `/home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio.pid'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. *#0 0x00f21603 in dbt_db_del_table (_dc=0xb6071e60, _s=0xbf837040, sync=0) at dbt_lib.c:238* 238 dbt_lib.c: Arquivo ou diretório não encontrado. in dbt_lib.c Best Regards

2 10

Re: [SR-Users] simple question but can't find the answer
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

Hello, On 9/30/11 12:11 AM, JJ Zeng wrote: > > Thanks Daniel. I followed your advice and install kamailio 3.1. Now > I get a weird problem: it works 1 out 5 times for the relaying. > try to set like tcp_connection_lifetime=3604 global parameter, or to a value higher than the longer registration time. > > The t_relay is where the the problem is, because I check the response > code and route(LOCATION) always succeeds, which means the entries > exist in "location". > > If I don't put set_forward_no_connect, then t_relay will take a long > time until my client time out. If I put it, then the client will get > 477 right away. > > BTW, the original config didn't work, either. That's why I started to > strip down some irrelevant stuff. > What errors you got with the default config? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Dec 5-8, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Placing ds_select_dst in kamailio.cfg, where?
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 29 Sep '11

29 Sep '11

Hello, please keep the mainling list cc-ed. Calling ds_select_dst() first in the main route block is not really a good place. First you have to handle sanity checks, within dialog requests a.s.o. Of course it is a matter of your purpose, but as general hint, selecting the destination should be done just (or as close as possible) before relaying. If you take default config and you have only load balancing, then you can replace location lookup part with load balancing. Other parts may be stripped as well, just giving some direction here. Cheers, Daniel On 9/28/11 11:11 PM, Henrik Aagaard Sørensen wrote: > That did the job. > > I just placed the ds_select_dst-code at the very first thing after route{ > > Thank you for your help! > > 2011/9/28 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com > <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> > > Hello, > > the devel version of dispatcher module README has a different > config example, maybe it helps you more: > > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules_k/dispatcher.html#id2522847 > > I am considering to update it again soon to be a bit more complete > and follow the structure of the default config file shipped with > kamailio. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 9/28/11 6:30 PM, Henrik Aagaard Sørensen wrote: >> Hi Carsten. >> >> The configuration works. It's actually where (which line) in the >> configuration I should put: >> ds_select_dst("1", "0"); >> >> :) I'm not strong in Kamailio and just want it to load balance >> between Freswitch servers. So I have a basic installation of >> Kamailio, without MySQL, NAT, Auth etc. >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Carsten Bock >> <carsten(a)ng-voice.com <mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> When you've got problems with placing "ds_select_dst()" in your >> config, you should do the following: >> - Open an Editor of your choice >> - go to the line, where you want to place it >> - type: ds_select_dst("1", "0"); >> - save & exit >> >> Just kidding! You should do the following with your config: >> kamailio -f <path-to-your-config> -c >> >> What error is displayed? If none, then check your syslog for >> errors. >> Could you post your config? It is better to put a full path >> in the >> config to the dispatcher-file... otherwise it might be >> dependent of, >> where you are running the init.d-skript/kamailio.... >> >> I am using dispatcher in Kamailio 1.5, 3.1 and 3.2, >> everythings works >> fine with me. >> >> Kind regards, >> Carsten >> >> 2011/9/28 Henrik Aagaard Sørensen >> <henrikaagaardsorensen(a)gmail.com >> <mailto:henrikaagaardsorensen@gmail.com>>: >> > I've installed 2 Freeswitch on different servers and would >> like to have >> > Kamailio load balance between them. >> > >> > I've installed Kamailio following: >> > >> http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:kamailio-3.1.x-from-git >> > >> > I've created dispatcher.list and added: >> > >> > loadmodule "dispatcher.so" >> > >> > modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "../etc/dispatcher.list") >> > >> > in the kamailio.cfg. >> > >> > But looking at: >> > >> http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/dispatcher.html >> > I'm having difficulties to placing: >> > >> > ds_select_dst("1", "0"); >> > >> > in the kamailio.cfg that was created originally. >> > >> > Can anyone help me? >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users >> mailing list >> > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Carsten Bock >> CEO (Geschäftsführer) >> >> ng-voice GmbH i. Gr. >> Schomburgstr. 80 >> D-22767 Hamburg / Germany >> >> http://www.ng-voice.com >> mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com <mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com> >> >> Mobile +49 179 2021244 <tel:%2B49%20179%202021244> >> Office +49 40 34927219 <tel:%2B49%2040%2034927219> >> Fax +49 40 34927220 <tel:%2B49%2040%2034927220> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users >> mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla --http://www.asipto.com > Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin:http://asipto.com/u/kat > http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda > > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] Logmessage when Dispatcher-Module sets a dispatcher to probing
by Timo Klecker 29 Sep '11

29 Sep '11

Hey again, Btw: I am using Kamailio 3.1.5 and found the event_route in 3.2.x Dispatcher documentation. Is there a possibility in 3.1.x? Greetings Timo Von: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] Im Auftrag von Timo Klecker Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. September 2011 11:10 An: 'kamailio users' Betreff: [SR-Users] Logmessage when Dispatcher-Module sets a dispatcher to probing Hey, I'd like to have a log-entry in the kamailio logfile when #ds_probind_threshhold OPTIONS pings fail to reach a dispatcher (408 localy generated after #fr_timer ms). Is it possible to do this without changing code? Greetings Timo

3 3

simple question but can't find the answer
by JJ Zeng 29 Sep '11

29 Sep '11

Hi, I am really new to ser(just installed it today). My situation is here: Both A and B make tcp connection to ser proxy server. If A sends "Invite" to B, ser would look up the tcp connection of B, and relay the sip request. If B is not connected, then 480 is returned to A. When B sends back the response, ser would relay it to A. It looks really simple, but I just can't figure out how to do it. Thanks. JJ

2 3

Logmessage when Dispatcher-Module sets a dispatcher to probing
by Timo Klecker 29 Sep '11

29 Sep '11

Hey, I'd like to have a log-entry in the kamailio logfile when #ds_probind_threshhold OPTIONS pings fail to reach a dispatcher (408 localy generated after #fr_timer ms). Is it possible to do this without changing code? Greetings Timo

1 0

OpenIMS
by Carlos Ruiz Diaz 29 Sep '11

29 Sep '11

Hello list. I'm trying to test/implement http://www.openimscore.org/ to setup an IMS scenario for development purposes. The project seems quite inactive to me and I wonder if there is any other similar project or this one just died and is no longer maintained. The documentation didn't specify if there is any kind of compatibility with Kamailio and based on what was written, only SER core architecture is supported. Any help will be appreciated. Regards. Carlos.

3 4

documentation update for 3.2.0 and wiki system
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 28 Sep '11

28 Sep '11

Hello, in preparation for release 3.2.0, I was checking our wiki (on kamailio.org), which is quite rich in information, but some tutorials are for older versions. Maybe it is also a good time to do some restructuring along with the update of the useful tutorials to be valid for 3.2.0. For restructuring, the main goal is to provide some ways to let people find the documentation they need (and it is available there) easier. Some ideas, introducing categorization/tags for specific topics (e.g., radius, ldap, presence, asterisk, ...), introducing some index pages to link tutorials per version, etc. More suggestions are welcome here, let us know what will make your life easier in browsing the docs. On another hand, currently wiki is based on dokuwiki, which from my point of view did good job so far, but maybe we are missing another excellent wiki system that we should use, because provides more tools for this kind of purpose. One thing I was missing, was export to pdf, which I may be possible right now with dokuwiki plugins -- or even better, we can get something to export to docbook xml format with dokuwiki or other wiki system. In the same kind of subject, what about using git to store (or at least have a replica of) the wiki pages? IIRC, I saw somewhere that even for dokuwiki is possible to configure to use a git repository to store the wiki content instead of local CVS. This will allow people to mirror very easy the content. I could spot from time to time web spiders downloading the wiki. Comments or other suggestions to make the access to documentation easier? Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

2 1

Placing ds_select_dst in kamailio.cfg, where?
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 28 Sep '11

28 Sep '11

I've installed 2 Freeswitch on different servers and would like to have Kamailio load balance between them. I've installed Kamailio following: http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:kamailio-3.1.x-from-git I've created dispatcher.list and added: loadmodule "dispatcher.so" modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "../etc/dispatcher.list") in the kamailio.cfg. But looking at: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/dispatcher.html I'm having difficulties to placing: ds_select_dst("1", "0"); in the kamailio.cfg that was created originally. Can anyone help me?

3 3

Sip-router gentoo ebuild v3.1.5
by caio 28 Sep '11

28 Sep '11

Hello, Just want to announce the availability of an ebuild for version 3.1.5 (kamailio and ser flavours) on Gentoo Portage Overlays. Here the git link: * http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=user/caio.git;a=tree;f=net-misc/si… The unofficial overlays portage website: * http://gpo.zugaina.org/net-misc/sip-router Important, this is not an official ebuild, and neither it's not at official gentoo portage tree. You can use *layman* to add this overlay. Also at pkg/ser/gentoo path of sip-router project you can find the latest version. If you need any guidance to probe this ebuild under your gentoo linux do not hesitate to contact me or provide some feedback here at the lists. Best regards, Claudio

2 2

Accounting only the 2nd branch of missed serial forked call
by Ozren Lapcevic 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Hi, I'm having some problems accounting missed serial forked calls to mysql database. I have following setup. Each user can have up to two contacts: telephone number (routed to asterisk) and SIP URI. Users can specify which contact has higher priority - which one should ring first. There is also SEMS voicemail which is forked as 3rd serial call leg if there is no answer at first two contacts. For example, I have two users: oz(a)abc.hr and pero(a)abc.hr. pero(a)abc.hr also has set telephone number as alternative number if he is not reachable at sip:pero@abc.hr. Moreover, pero(a)abc.hr has voicemail turned on. When oz(a)abc.hr calls pero(a)abc.hr, first pero(a)abc.hr's SIP client rings, then if there is no answer and after the timeout telephone number rings and finally, if there is no answer at telephone and after the timeout INVITE is forked to SEMS. There are two interesting scenarios accounting-wise which can happened: 1. oz(a)abc.hr calls pero(a)abc.hr, there are no answers and call is forked to voicemail. 2. oz(a)abc.hr calls pero(a)abc.hr, there is no answer at SIP client, but pero answers call at telephone. When scenario 1 happens, I want to have only one log (row) in missed_calls table. When scenario 2 happens, I don't want to have a log in missed_calls table. To accomplish this,* I want to log only the 2nd branch of the forked call. However, there is either a bug in acc module or I'm doing something wrong, and I can't get Kamailio to log only the 2nd branch*. I think that I am setting the FLT_ACCMISSED flag correctly - after the 2nd branch is handled and prior to calling the RELAY route. Logs show that FLT_ACCMISSED flag is set prior to calling t_relay(), and there are no errors in debug log. I am using $ru = "something" to rewrite URI prior to forking request. I can easily set up logging of every call (two missed calls for serially forked call to two locations) by setting FLT_ACCMISSED flag for each INVITE. I can set up logging of every call's 1st branch, by reseting FLT_ACCMISSED flag when handling 2nd branch of the call. Interestingly, logging of only the 2nd branch of the serial forked call works when there is no forking to voicemail! Any ideas how to solve this problem? Bellow are important parts of my config file. I'm running kamailio 3.1.4. Cheers Ozren # ----- acc params ----- /* what special events should be accounted ? */ modparam("acc", "early_media", 0) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 1) modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 0) modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 0) /* account triggers (flags) */ modparam("acc", "log_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "log_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED) modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", FLT_ACCFAILED) modparam("acc", "log_extra","src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd") /* enhanced DB accounting */ #!ifdef WITH_ACCDB modparam("acc", "db_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED) modparam("acc", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("acc", "db_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;dst_user=$tU;dst_domain=$td;src_ip=$si") #!endif ... # Main SIP request routing logic # - processing of any incoming SIP request starts with this route route { # per request initial checks route(REQINIT); if (src_ip != ****) { # NAT detection route(NAT); } # handle requests within SIP dialogs route(WITHINDLG); ### only initial requests (no To tag) # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) t_relay(); exit; } t_check_trans(); # authentication route(AUTH); # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) # - remove preloaded route headers remove_hf("Route"); if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) record_route(); # account only INVITEs if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting } # dispatch requests to foreign domains route(SIPOUT); ### requests for my local domains # handle presence related requests route(PRESENCE); # handle registrations route(REGISTRAR); if ($rU==$null) { # request with no Username in RURI sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); exit; } # dispatch destinations to PSTN route(PSTN); if ( is_method("INVITE") ) { route(DBALIASES); #check for user defined forking priorities and timers route(FORK); } # user location service route(LOCATION); route(RELAY); } #check for user defined forking priorities and timers route[FORK]{ sql_query("con", "select * from usr_pref_custom where uuid='$tu'", "pref"); $avp(uuid)=$dbr(pref=>[0,0]); $avp(email)=$dbr(pref=>[0,1]); $avp(prio1)=$dbr(pref=>[0,2]); $avp(prio2)=$dbr(pref=>[0,3]); $avp(timer1)=$dbr(pref=>[0,5]); $avp(timer2)=$dbr(pref=>[0,6]); if (strlen($avp(prio1))>5) { # user has multiple contacts, do serial forking setflag(FLT_USRPREF); # set counter if (!$avp(prio)) { $avp(prio) = 1; } # overwrite request URI with highest priority contact if ($avp(prio1) =~ "^sip:00") { $ru = $avp(prio1) + "@host"; xlog("L_INFO","PRIO 1 is tel number, RURI set: $ru"); } else { $ru = $avp(prio1); xlog("L_INFO","PRIO 1 is SIP URI, RURI set: $ru"); } } } route[RELAY] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if (check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } if (isflagset(FLT_NATS) || isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { route(RTPPROXY); } #!endif /* example how to enable some additional event routes */ if (is_method("INVITE")) { t_on_reply("REPLY_ONE"); t_on_failure("FAIL_ONE"); #if users have priorities set, use FAIL_FORK failure route if ( isflagset(FLT_USRPREF) ) { t_on_failure("FAIL_FORK"); } } if (isflagset(FLT_ACCMISSED)) xlog("L_INFO","RELAY, $rm $ru, ACCMISSED FLAG IS SET"); else xlog("L_INFO","RELAY, $rm $ru, ACCMISSED FLAG IS NOT SET"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } # Handle requests within SIP dialogs route[WITHINDLG] { if (has_totag()) { # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { xlog("L_INFO","WITHINDLG, loose_route()"); if (is_method("BYE")) { xlog("L_INFO","WITHINDLG, BYE, DO ACCOUNTING"); setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails } route(RELAY); } else { if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) { # in-dialog subscribe requests route(PRESENCE); exit; } if ( is_method("ACK") ) { if ( t_check_trans() ) { # no loose-route, but stateful ACK; # must be an ACK after a 487 # or e.g. 404 from upstream server t_relay(); exit; } else { # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); } exit; } } # USER location service route[LOCATION] { #skip if $ru is telephone number if ($ru =~ "^sip:00") { xlog("L_INFO","SKIP lookup..."); } else { if (!lookup("location")) { switch ($rc) { case -1: case -3: t_newtran(); t_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -2: sl_send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); exit; } } } # when routing via usrloc, log the missed calls also, but only if user doesn't have prios set if ( is_method("INVITE") && !(isflagset(FLT_USRPREF))) { setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED); } } # Failure route for forked calls failure_route[FAIL_FORK] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT if (is_method("INVITE") && (isbflagset(FLB_NATB) || isflagset(FLT_NATS))) { unforce_rtp_proxy(); } #!endif if ($avp(prio) >= 1) { $avp(prio) = $avp(prio) + 1; # handle 2nd branch if ( ($avp(prio) == 2) && ( isflagset(FLT_USRPREF) )) { t_on_failure("FAIL_FORK"); if ($avp(prio2) =~ "^sip:00") { xlog("L_INFO","FAIL FORK, PRIO 2 is tel number"); $ru = $avp(prio2) + "@host"; } else { xlog("L_INFO","FAIL FORK, PRIO 2 is SIP URI"); $ru = $avp(prio2); route(LOCATION); } setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED); } else { $avp(prio) = 0; $ru = $(avp(uuid)); rewritehostport("host:port"); xlog("L_INFO","FAIL FORK, VOICEMAIL email:$avp(email), ru:$ru, br: $br"); append_hf("P-App-Name: voicemail\r\n"); append_hf("P-App-Param: Email-Address=$avp(email)\r\n"); } route(RELAY); } if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } }

2 21

Kamailio with IMS extensions build
by loic.trottin＠orange.com 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Hi all, I try to compile Kamailio with IMS extensions from OpenIMSCore available in carstenbock/ims branch in the GIT repository. I have some problems with the modules "Client_Ro" and "pcscf" that do not compile: CC (gcc) [M Client_Ro.so] ims_ro.o ims_ro.c: In function 'send_ccr_interim': ims_ro.c:594: error: 'AVP_EPC_User_Equipment_Info_Type_MAC' undeclared (first use in this function) ims_ro.c:594: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ims_ro.c:594: error: for each function it appears in.) ims_ro.c: In function 'send_ccr_stop': ims_ro.c:749: error: 'AVP_EPC_User_Equipment_Info_Type_MAC' undeclared (first use in this function) ims_ro.c: In function 'Ro_Send_CCR': ims_ro.c:831: error: 'struct dlg_binds' has no member named 'get_dlg' ims_ro.c:835: error: 'struct dlg_binds' has no member named 'unref_dlg' ims_ro.c:886: error: 'AVP_EPC_User_Equipment_Info_Type_MAC' undeclared (first use in this function) CC (gcc) [M pcscf.so] pcc_avp.o pcc_avp.c:1459: error: 'AVP_IMS_Subscription_Id_Type_E164' undeclared (first use in this function) pcc_avp.c:1459: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once pcc_avp.c:1459: error: for each function it appears in.) pcc_avp.c:1461: error: 'AVP_IMS_Subscription_Id_Type_SIP_URI' undeclared (first use in this function) Does anybody have encountered these problems? Is there a stable version tagged of the branch carstenbock/ims available in the GIT repository ? Best regards, Loïc. ******************************************************************************** IMPORTANT.Les informations contenues dans ce message electronique y compris les fichiers attaches sont strictement confidentielles et peuvent etre protegees par la loi. Ce message electronique est destine exclusivement au(x) destinataire(s) mentionne(s) ci-dessus. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur ou s il ne vous est pas destine, veuillez immediatement le signaler a l expediteur et effacer ce message et tous les fichiers eventuellement attaches. Toute lecture, exploitation ou transmission des informations contenues dans ce message est interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible d alteration. A ce titre, le Groupe France Telecom decline toute responsabilite notamment s il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. De meme, il appartient au destinataire de s assurer de l absence de tout virus. IMPORTANT.This e-mail message and any attachments are strictly confidential and may be protected by law. This message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail message. Any unauthorized view, usage or disclosure ofthis message is prohibited. Since e-mail messages may not be reliable, France Telecom Group shall not be liable for any message if modified, changed or falsified. Additionally the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. ********************************************************************************

3 3

need little help to setting up pike module
by dirtytoni＠gmx.de 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Hi to all on this list =) jUSt a tiny user question aboUt pike module(at least kamailio doc). are these values for sampling_time_unit seconds or minutes ? it's not in the doc. same 4 remove_latency. thanks for helping me out sorry to bother you best regards Toni -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

2 1

Account 403 to RADIUS
by Mino Haluz 26 Sep '11

26 Sep '11

Hi, I have this code: if ( is_user_in("From", "blocked") && is_method("INVITE")) { xlog("L_INFO", "XLOG: [number_and_ruri_checks] NOTICE: Account ($fu) to ($ru) is blocked"); sl_send_reply("403", " Account blocked "); exit; } I would like to account also this answer to Radius, now I have it only in application xlog. Thanks, Mino

3 5

Migration from v3.1.x to 3.2.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 26 Sep '11

26 Sep '11

Hello, a kind reminder for everyone to add to the wiki page hints for migration from v3.1.x to v3.2.0. Especially to developers that know what kind of major changes they did to existing modules in 3.1.x. The wiki is open for anyone: * http://sip-router.org/wiki/install/3.1.x-to-3.2.x I just updated the section related to database structure changes. If you spot errors/missing parts, go ahead and fix it. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] I am getting this error in the log When REGISTER message is received from jitsi
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 23 Sep '11

23 Sep '11

On 9/22/11 9:04 PM, Krishna Kurapati wrote: > Thanks Daniel, > > Here it is... > > [...] It looked ok for my eye. Can you run kamailio with higher debug level (debug=4 in config file) and send the log messages related to parsing the URI for AoR? Cheers, Daniel > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > <miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > can you grab such REGISTER with ngrep (or wireshark) and past it here? > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 9/22/11 8:07 PM, Krishna Kurapati wrote: >> Sep 22 09:49:53 siptest /usr/sbin/kamailio[3160]: ERROR: >> registrar [common.c:75]: failed to parse Address of Record >> Sep 22 09:49:53 siptest /usr/sbin/kamailio[3160]: ERROR: >> registrar [save.c:822]: failed to extract Address Of Record >> >> Is there a problem when AoR contains "_" >> >> for example is AoR krish_kura(a)sip.org <mailto:krish_kura@sip.org> >> is not allowed? >> >> Thanks >> Krish Kura >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla --http://www.asipto.com > Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin:http://asipto.com/u/kat > http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda > > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

2 4

Re: [SR-Users] CANCEL is not processed in onsend_route
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 23 Sep '11

23 Sep '11

Hello, On 9/15/11 4:02 PM, Timo Klecker wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I managed to get a log with debug 4 from one call. I had to take out all > IP-Addresses and Usernames, hope you can use it. the log confirmed what I expected: Sep 15 15:32:33 vux896 /sbin/kamailio[31594]: DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace.c:954]: no uas msg, local transaction Sep 15 15:32:33 vux896 /sbin/kamailio[31594]: DEBUG: tm [t_fwd.c:1242]: DEBUG: e2e_cancel: e2e cancel proceeding Because a new CANCEL is generated from scratch, incoming message is lost and no longer available to check the sip trace flag. Now, the question is how to decide whether the cancel is to be siptraced. I can lookup for incoming CANCEL and check if it has the siptrace flag set, but there are CANCELs in case of local timeout or parallel forking, so I think it is better to actually lookup the INVITE transaction and if the siptrace flag is set for it, record the cancel. If there is no INVITE transaction anymore, the cancel is forwarded stateless and can be captured in onsend route, although it should be normally discarded if it is known that the proxy works in statefull mode only. Any other opinions? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

2 2

carrierroute module
by Mino Haluz 23 Sep '11

23 Sep '11

Hi, I have a problem with configuring the carrierroute module, I do not clearly understand how it should work from the documentation. What I would like to do is that I have 2 gateways (A.A.A.A and B.B.B.B), lots of scan_prefixes with different rewrite prefixes. The traffic should be sent to the 1 gateway, and if it fails (5xx,4xx codes) it should go to the another. I have only one SIP domain (domain.com). The question is, how the tables (domain_name, carrierroute, carrierfailroute) should be filled? Can I achieve this scenario with the carrierroute module ? Thanks. Mino

1 0

XCAP over SIP
by Krishna Kurapati 23 Sep '11

23 Sep '11

Hi, The document http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k31-made-simple describes that XCAP can be sent over SIP instead of over HTTP. I tried to do however, the server is unable to update presence rules. I was using PUBLISH method. I was using content-type = text... Has anyone used SIP to send over XCAP? Appreciate if someone could share a link or configuration changes required. Thanks Krish

3 3

I am getting this error in the log When REGISTER message is received from jitsi
by Krishna Kurapati 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

Sep 22 09:49:53 siptest /usr/sbin/kamailio[3160]: ERROR: registrar [common.c:75]: failed to parse Address of Record Sep 22 09:49:53 siptest /usr/sbin/kamailio[3160]: ERROR: registrar [save.c:822]: failed to extract Address Of Record Is there a problem when AoR contains "_" for example is AoR krish_kura(a)sip.org is not allowed? Thanks Krish Kura

2 1

perl module compilation on centos
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

Hello, while building the v3.1.5 RPMs, the perl module failed to compile on centos 5 and 6, with following error: error: `PL_unitcheckav' undeclared (first use in this function ) so its packaging was disabled. It works fine on opensuse and fedora. Someone on twitter tried with the package perl-ExtUtils-Embed (like in fedora) and worked. However, OpenSUSE Build System fails to find that package. Is anyone here with latest centos 5 or 6 that can try compilation of perl module in v3.1.5 and let me know the result? Few months ago, it didn't fail for v3.1.4. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

4 5

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and FreeSWITCH realtime integration, tutorial?
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

But FreeSwitch don't use MySQL like Asterisk? So adapting isn't that easy or...??? On 21/09/2011, at 16.18, David <david(a)styleflare.com> wrote: You can adapt pretty easily. On 9/21/11 3:46 PM, Henrik Aagaard Sørensen wrote: Does anyone know if there somewhere exists a tutorial about Kamailio and FreeSWITCH realtime integration? I have Googled a lot and found: http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:index and http://kb.asipto.com/freeswitch:index On the same site there is a tutorial for Kamailio and Asterisk realtime integration, but not for FreeSWITCH. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with REGISTER retransmissions
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

Hello, I tried to reproduce with a very simple config to handle register requests. So I sent a REGISTER with expires 60 (very much the same as the one in the trace you sent), waited a while, then sent two REGISTERs having the CSeq incremented. All went fine. I tested with master and 3.1 branches (so the last is actually 3.1.5). Can you upgrade to 3.1.5 first and try again? If still fails, then update config to print the return code for save() function, something like: $var(r) = save("location"); xlog("code returned by save is $var(r)\n"); if($var(r) < 0) send_reply("500", "Failure"); Let me know the value of the returned code for the register that does not have a contact in reply. Cheers, Daniel On 9/20/11 2:10 PM, Alejandro Mingo wrote: > > Hi Daniel-Constantin, > > I send you the PCAP and LOG files corresponding to one of these > situations. As you can see in the LOG file, one thread (5444) handles > the first REGISTER, other thread (5447) handles the second REGISTER > (retransmission) and a third thread (5451) indicates that the binding > has expired, six seconds after the arrival of both REGISTERs. > > Thanks again. > > Alejandro. > > > > El 20/09/2011 10:54, Daniel-Constantin Mierla escribió: >> Hello, >> >> On 9/20/11 10:13 AM, Alejandro Mingo wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since we installed last version of Kamailio (3.1.4) >> >> the last version is now 3.1.5, but this is not really the most >> important aspect. However, it is recommended to upgrade, there were >> some fixed to registration handling when register requests have >> multiple contacts. >>> we have been experiencing a big problem with REGISTER >>> retransmissions. When the server receives a retransmitted REGISTER >>> it removes the binding and the UAC remains unregistered until next >>> refreshing period. I include a PCAP capture that shows this behaviour. >>> >>> I am not 100% sure that this problem never happened with older >>> versions. >>> >>> Has anybody experienced the same problem? >> I will try to reproduce and investigate myself. Anyhow, meanwhile >> maybe you can provide more hints faster. Do you have error messages >> in the syslog? Can you run with debug=4 in config file and send the >> output in syslog for such a case? -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

2 3

Kamailio 3.1.5 RPMS
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

Hello, just to let you know that the RPMs of Kamailio 3.1.5 were generated for CentOS, Fedora, OpenSUSE and RedHat. This time CentOS RPMs are packaged for both versions 5 and 6. Links are available on our wiki at: * http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/packages:rpms Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Kamailio and FreeSWITCH realtime integration, tutorial?
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 22 Sep '11

22 Sep '11

Does anyone know if there somewhere exists a tutorial about Kamailio and FreeSWITCH realtime integration? I have Googled a lot and found: http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:index and http://kb.asipto.com/freeswitch:index On the same site there is a tutorial for Kamailio and Asterisk realtime integration, but not for FreeSWITCH.

4 4

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated
by Timo Reimann 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

Hey Phillip, On 20.09.2011 13:48, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > Thanks for your email. > > Yes dlg_manage(); has to now be called on INVITE and BYE/CANCEL messages. > Where would i have to call loose_route()? Only on INVITE? On *all* in-dialog requests, i.e., all requests which contain a To tag. This may include Re-INVITEs too (but not initial INVITEs). > My configuration did not change between 3.1.2 and 3.1.5. > > Call flow example: > ============== > > Cisco PGW ===> Kamailio 3.1.5 ===> VOIP PROVIDER or ASTERISK PABX > > > The below is my configuration. Let's take a look at it: > #!KAMAILIO > # [...] > if(is_method("BYE|CANCEL")) > > { > > dlg_manage(); > > > > # per request initial checks > route(REQINIT); > > # NAT detection > route(NAT); > > # handle requests within SIP dialogs > route(WITHINDLG); [...] > # Handle requests within SIP dialogs > route[WITHINDLG] { > if (has_totag()) { > # sequential request withing a dialog should > # take the path determined by record-routing > if (loose_route()) { [...] So route[WITHINDLG] contains the logic to track in-dialog requests. However, you seem to call that route only from BYE and CANCEL requests, missing out ACKs, which is likely the reason why things go wrong. So make sure you run all in-dialog requests through that route, and you should be fine (hopefully). Cheers, --Timo

2 8

Kamailio Development Training, San Francisco Area, October 2011
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

Hello, since I am attending GSoC'11 Mentors Summit and come to Bay Area again, it is time to bring the developer training in USA, therefore I am planning to organize a two-day seminar focused on developing Kamailio extensions in C. Among topics to be approached: - internal architecture - SIP parser - memory manager - locking manager - database API - config file language interpreter - RPC interface - pseudo-variables and transformations framework - module interface – write your own extensions in C as modules - inter-module APIs - tm, presence, a.s.o. - documentation docbook format This kind of training follows the pattern from the past, trying to keep a low attendee fee, targeting just to cover the expenses with the organization. I am discussing with several people for a good location at a convenient price, however, I am open for new alternatives, including companies/institutes that want to host the event at no cost in exchange of sending few attendees free of charge. Contact me if you can help here. Training is planned for October 24-25, right now the estimated fee per participant is 350USD (it will not exceed 400USD). The policy to accept people is first come, first served. You can register at this time to reserve your seat(s), emailing to me or to registration(a)kamailio.org. Number of seats is usually 10 to 20, last one organized in February in Barcelona filled up quickly. Once there will be enough interested people and a location selected, I will have more precise details regarding the participation to this seminar and I will send updates. Looking forward to meeting many of you and get new US developers on board of the project in the near future. Cheers, Daniel -- http://www.kamailio.org/w/daniel-constantin-mierla/

1 0

how to remove media description from sdp?
by Juha Heinanen 21 Sep '11

21 Sep '11

trying to hack around the possible fix_nated_sdp("1") issue that i outlined in previous message, i thought to remove video media description from sdp. in sdpops module there is sdp_with_media(type), but for some reason no sdp_remove_media(type) function. is there some other means to get rid of sdp video media description? -- juha

3 3

Digest authentication
by Morten Isaksen 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

Hi, Sorry for the slightly off topic question, but I am trying to debug a buggy PBX and want to check if the digest information is correct. I have this perl script. #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use Digest::MD5 qw(md5 md5_hex md5_base64); my $uri = 'sip:sip1.uni-tel.dk'; my $method = "SIP/2.0"; my $username = "69102208"; my $password = "password"; my $nonce = "4e78d2b0a72196d9123be7c88d093bd74c77f35e"; my $realm = "sip1.uni-tel.dk"; my $a1 = "$username:$realm:$password"; my $ha1 = md5_hex($a1); my $a2 = "$method:$uri"; my $ha2 = md5_hex($a2); print "A1 : $a1\n"; print "A2 : $a2\n"; my $response = md5_hex("$ha1:$nonce:$ha2"); print "\nRES : $response\n\n"; I registered with a softphone and entered the above values from the Authentication header, but I cannot get the response to match. Any help would be appreciated. -- Morten Isaksen

2 2

wt_timer, delayed replies and sendto error
by Andreas Granig 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

Hi, Another funny thing I encountered lately is this: Client sends INVITE via kamailio (via dispatcher) to sems, gets back 100/200, sends another couple of INVITE with same CSeq (looks like retransmissions), gets back more 200, then sends ACKs for each of the 200 it got. Looks like a quite broken client to me, but anyways. The interesting thing is that after >5000ms (which is bigger then tm.wt_timer), another 200 is sent from sems to kamailio to the client. I see the 200 coming to kamailio in a network trace, but not an according log message in the kamailio logs. What I see though is this: Sep 14 13:51:26 sp2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15950]: ERROR: <core> [udp_server.c:586]: ERROR: udp_send: sendto(sock,0x97ec10,1055,0,1.2.3.4:58620,16): Invalid argument(22) Sep 14 13:51:26 sp2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[15950]: ERROR: <core> [forward.h:149]: msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed The 1.2.3.4:58620 is obviously taken from the Vias, which looks like this: Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:5060;rport=5060;branch=xyz Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.9:58620;received=1.2.3.4;rport=58620;branch=abc The top-most Via is itself, the second is the one which reflects the destination address in the error message above. So I'm wondering whether there is some issue with finding the proper socket after wt_timer is expired (note that the leg client<->kamailio uses a different socket (with public ip) than kamailio<->sems (which uses 127.0.0.1)). Or any other idea where this error could come from? It's actually an educated guess that this could be related to wt_timer, but I don't know what else it could be. Andreas

2 6

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated
by Timo Reimann 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

Hey Phillip, you probably forgot to keep the mailing list in CC, I'll do that for you. On 19.09.2011 08:43, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > You are right. > > I added the function dlg_manage(); when there is a BYE or CANCEL and now > its working perfectly. Before i had this function defined only on > INVITES. The strange thing is that it was working normally before when > dlg_manage(); was defined only for INVITE messages in the route block. So you are saying that before, you called dlg_manage() on INVITEs only but now, you need that function on both INVITE and BYE/CANCEL messages? That'd still qualify as a bug as the trigger to tracking the dialog (i.e., dlg_manage()) is required only once. After that, the dialog module makes sure that all dialog-related messages are properly processed. The only thing that's necessary for sequential requests to be tracked correctly is a call to loose_route() on such messages. If you are sure that your Kamailio configuration didn't change between 3.1.2 and 3.1.5 w.r.t. dialog tracking or anything that could affect it, I'd be willing to take a closer look at this issue (giving you can provide me with more information on your scenario, like call flow examples or similar). Cheers, --Timo > The calls that were suppose to be terminated before where in state 3 to > answer your question. However, i still see calls in state 3 now but they > are valid. > > Regards > Phillip > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Timo Reimann <timo.reimann(a)1und1.de > <mailto:timo.reimann@1und1.de>> wrote: > > Hey Phillip, > > after looking closer at what has been reported to me initially, your > case may be different after all. > > Could you possibly use "kamctl fifo dlg_list" to check what state the > majority of dialogs that should be terminated in your opinion are in? > Being given the reference counter should be useful in debugging this as > well. > > > Thanks, > > --Timo > > > > On 16.09.2011 14:22, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Timo Reimann > <timo.reimann(a)1und1.de <mailto:timo.reimann@1und1.de> > > <mailto:timo.reimann@1und1.de <mailto:timo.reimann@1und1.de>>> wrote: > > > > Hey Phillip, > > > > > > On 16.09.2011 13:35, Phillman25 Kyriacou wrote: > > > Hello > > > > > > I have been facing an issue where the dialog module is showing > > calls as > > > being active when in fact the call has already been > completed long ago > > > and this is giving wrong number of concurrent calls on our > SNMP work > > > station (CACTI) when polling the data from Kamailio. I > realized this > > > only started occurring after i upgraded from 3.1.2 to 3.1.5, has > > anyone > > > experienced the same issue? > > > > I was *just* being notified of issues concerning dialogs not being > > deleted. Working on this right now to report back soon. > > > > Thanks for the note! > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > --Timo

2 1

Add client certificate checking against a CRL in opensips
by tomsc 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

Hi everyone, I'd like to check that a client certificat is revoked or not against a crl. Actually, opensips use context SSL_CTX. How can I do with this context? I do this change to load the crl : load_crl(SSL_CTX * ctx, char *filename) { LM_DBG("entered load crl\n"); X509_STORE *pStore = SSL_CTX_get_cert_store(ctx); X509_LOOKUP* plookup = X509_STORE_add_lookup(pStore, X509_LOOKUP_file()); if (!X509_load_crl_file(plookup, filename, X509_FILETYPE_PEM)){ LM_ERR("unable to load certificate file '%s'\n", filename); return -1; } LM_DBG("'%s' successfuly loaded\n", filename); return 0; } But I dont know how to add flags, is it the right solution? Thanks all -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Add-client-certificate-checking-against-a-CRL-in-open… Sent from the OpenSER Users Mailing List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

Lazy evaluation in if expressions?
by Morten Isaksen 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

Does Kamailio use lazy evaluation in if expressions? Like if ($var(a) == 2 && $var(b) ==3) { ... } then $var(b) == 3 is only evaluated if $var(a) == 2 is true -- Morten Isaksen

3 2

directed media problem when video is included in sdp
by Juha Heinanen 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

when sems receives voice call invite from ua behind nat that has direction:active in its sdp, like this: Session Description Protocol Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0 Owner/Creator, Session Id (o): foo.bar 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.1. 68 Session Name (s): - Connection Information (c): IN IP4 192.168.1.68 Time Description, active time (t): 0 0 Media Description, name and address (m): audio 8500 RTP/AVP 18 4 112 100 101 0 8 106 Media Attribute (a): sendrecv Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:18 G729/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:4 G723/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:112 AMR/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:100 EG711U/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:101 EG711A/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:106 telephone-event/8000 Media Attribute (a): direction:active sems includes direction:passive in 200 OK and starts to correctly send rtp packets to the ip address/port of received rtp packets. however, then sems receives a voice+video call invite like this: Session Description Protocol Session Description Protocol Version (v): 0 Owner/Creator, Session Id (o): foo.bar 0 0 IN IP4 192.168.1.68 Session Name (s): - Connection Information (c): IN IP4 192.168.1.68 Time Description, active time (t): 0 0 Media Description, name and address (m): audio 8500 RTP/AVP 18 4 112 100 101 0 8 106 Media Attribute (a): sendrecv Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:18 G729/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:4 G723/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:112 AMR/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:100 EG711U/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:101 EG711A/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:106 telephone-event/8000 Media Description, name and address (m): video 8600 RTP/AVP 34 Bandwidth Information (b): AS:300 Media Attribute (a): sendrecv Media Attribute (a): rtpmap:34 H263/90000 Media Attribute (a): direction:active it does not include direction:passive in 200 OK and keeps on sending rtp packets to 192.168.1.68 even after receiving first voice rtp packet from public ip of the ua. is this a bug in sems or is it a bug in sr nathelper_k fix_nated_sdp("1") implementation, i.e., does that function place direction:active line to only one place, when it should place it in two places (in both voice and video media descriptions)? -- juha

3 4

Module db_text
by Bruno Bresciani 20 Sep '11

20 Sep '11

Hi All, I'm starting kamailio version 3.1.2 with db_text module but when it tries to load route table, the following error is generated: * "ERROR: <core> [daemonize.c:273]: Main process exited before writing to pipe" * Someone Can Help me to understand why this error is happening? Below is part of kamaio's trace. Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_base.c:208]: _tbc->name: route Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_base.c:209]: _tbc->nrcols: 9 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_base.c:210]: _nc: 8 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_base.c:238]: new res with 8 cols Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_res.c:69]: new res with 8 cols Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:118]: allocate 28 bytes for result set at 0x82e23f0 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:155]: allocate 32 bytes for result names at 0x82e3798 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:165]: allocate 32 bytes for result types at 0x82e37c0 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_api.c:80]: allocate 8 bytes for RES_NAMES[0] at 0x82e2438 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_api.c:80]: allocate 8 bytes for RES_NAMES[1] at 0x82e2390 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_api.c:80]: allocate 8 bytes for RES_NAMES[2] at 0x82e23d0 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_api.c:80]: allocate 8 bytes for RES_NAMES[3] at 0x82e23e0 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_api.c:80]: allocate 8 bytes for RES_NAMES[4] at 0x82e37e8 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_api.c:80]: allocate 8 bytes for RES_NAMES[5] at 0x82e37f8 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_api.c:80]: allocate 8 bytes for RES_NAMES[6] at 0x82e3808 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: db_text [dbt_api.c:80]: allocate 8 bytes for RES_NAMES[7] at 0x82e3818 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: <core> [db_res.c:184]: allocate 8 bytes for rows at 0x82e3828 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[25661]: DEBUG: <core> [db_row.c:119]: allocate 160 bytes for row values at 0x82e3838 Sep 19 16:13:01 sswpst00 kamailio: ERROR: <core> [daemonize.c:273]: Main process exited before writing to pipe Best Regards

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy VS Turn
by Mikael Williams 19 Sep '11

19 Sep '11

> > ICE is not supported as I select the Media Proxy (which is TURN) manually > in some Nat cases...Even note that I do not have peer to peer calls between > 2 endpoints, just have VOIP to PSTN calls...All my VOIP customers supports > STUN/TURN but without ICE > > One more thing: I would like to ask how rtp proxy help to bypass NAT else > than working as relay server...Does it have any other job like find the NAT > type or check blocked port or something? > > Regards > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Klaus Darilion < > klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote: > >> STUN alone is not 100% sufficient, only ICE+TURN is reliable. Thus, only >> if all your clients support ICE+TURN then you can drop rtpproxy. >> >> klaus >> >> >> On 16.09.2011 16:47, Mikael Williams wrote: >> >>> Dear All, >>> >>> I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat >>> traversal to drp the rtpproxy from my solution as NAT traversal and >>> relay server as I'm using SYUN for NAT traversal and TURN as relay in >>> case of Symmetric NAT >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/**cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-**users<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> >>> >> >

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] sipp to kamailio doesn't match ACK [SOLVED]
by Uri Shacked 19 Sep '11

19 Sep '11

Hi, I got the same problem. Do you have the XML SIPp file for example? 10x Uri

1 0

Dialog module showing calls that have already been terminated
by Phillman25 Kyriacou 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

Hello I have been facing an issue where the dialog module is showing calls as being active when in fact the call has already been completed long ago and this is giving wrong number of concurrent calls on our SNMP work station (CACTI) when polling the data from Kamailio. I realized this only started occurring after i upgraded from 3.1.2 to 3.1.5, has anyone experienced the same issue? my config: ======== loadmodule "dialog.so" . . . . # ----------------- DIALOG MODULE PARAMETERS----------------------------------# modparam("dialog", "enable_stats", 1) modparam("dialog", "hash_size", 4096) modparam("dialog", "rr_param", "did") modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", 4) modparam("dialog", "timeout_avp", "$avp(i:10)") modparam("dialog", "dlg_extra_hdrs", "NULL") modparam("dialog", "dlg_match_mode", 1) modparam("dialog", "detect_spirals", 1) modparam("dialog", "db_url", "mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser") modparam("dialog", "db_mode", 1) modparam("dialog", "db_update_period", 60) modparam("dialog", "db_fetch_rows", 500) modparam("dialog", "table_name", "dialog") modparam("dialog", "from_uri_column", "from_uri") modparam("dialog", "from_tag_column", "from_tag") modparam("dialog", "to_uri_column", "to_uri") modparam("dialog", "to_tag_column", "to_tag") modparam("dialog", "h_id_column", "hash_id") modparam("dialog", "h_entry_column", "hash_entry") modparam("dialog", "state_column", "state") modparam("dialog", "start_time_column", "start_time") modparam("dialog", "timeout_column", "timeout") modparam("dialog", "sflags_column", "sflags") modparam("dialog", "bridge_controller", "sip:controller@kamailio.org") modparam("dialog", "default_timeout", 7200) . . . . route { # MANAGE ALL DIALOGS #=================================================== if (is_method("INVITE")) { if(is_method("INVITE") && !has_totag()) { $dlg_ctx(timeout_route) = 12; $dlg_ctx(timeout_bye) = 1; } dlg_manage(); } Thanks Phillip

2 3

kamailio debian/ubuntu support
by Jon Bonilla 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

Hi all with the release of kamailio 3.1.5, I've done a small change to the debian repositories: Nightly builds of kamailio_3.0 branch have been dropped and the repository has been erased. There is no development in this branch and it has no sense to keep nightly builds for it. Those (few) people using kamailio_3.0-nightly repositories are advised to move their sources.list to the stable 3.0 repository of upgrade to 3.1 or master branches. kamailio 3.0 will continue to be packaged if any new stable version is released for etch, lenny, squeeze and lucid. For 3.1 branch, nightly builds and stable repos will be provided for lenny, lucid and squeeze When the time for 3.2 (master branch at the moment) comes, I'll add Wheezy support. Not sure about Ubuntu distro support. Should we add support to Ubuntu 11.10 or wait until the lts 12.04 is released? Any opinions welcomed cheers, Jon

4 4

rtpproxy VS Turn
by Mikael Williams 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

Dear All, I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat traversal to drp the rtpproxy from my solution as NAT traversal and relay server as I'm using SYUN for NAT traversal and TURN as relay in case of Symmetric NAT Regards

2 1

Communication from IPv6 to Ipv4
by Loïc Fofana 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

My architecture is described below: TDM device----------- Call server[IPv4]---------------[IPv4]Kamailio[IPv6]------------[IPv6]Asterisk---------[IPv6]Linphone * * * * * * * * * * * * Media Server Rtpproxy Media Server and Rtpptoxy carry the media. Call Server carry only signaling. I have succeeded to establish audio communication between an IPv6 domain & an IPv4 domain i.e. : from an TDM device to a Linphone. However, When i try to establish a call from (IPv6 to IPv4), i.e. from Linphone to TDM device, the signaling is OK, but there's no voice. Because, Rtpproxy forward the media to the Call server instead the Media Server. Hence, there can't be voice. I have been stucking on this for a couple of months. I will be very glad if somebody have any idea. best regards!

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio terminating after upgrading from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4
by Phillman25 Kyriacou 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

Dear Marius Thank you for your prompt reply. I apologise, As i am a newbie could you please explain how to produce the below output that you require? Thanking you in advance for your help! Regards Phillip > Hello > Hello. You should have a coredump . Can you please send the trace (bt full) as seen with gdb ? Thanks Marius > Im facing a big problem after upgrading from version 3.1.2 to 3.1.4. > The kamailio process keeps on terminating every now and then, this is > what i was able to retrieve from my logs. > > > Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 kernel: [71448.062089] __ratelimit: 15 > callbacks suppressed > Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 kernel: [71448.062096] kamailio[13963]: > segfault at 14 ip 0816452a sp bfedc940 error 4 in kamailio[8048000+1d9000] > > > Does anyone have an idea why this is happening? > > Your help is much appreciated! > > Regards > Phillip

5 9

(no subject)
by Loïc Fofana 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

This is my scenario: Call server -------------(IPV4)Kamailio(IPV6)----------Asterisk(IPV6)------Linphone(IPV6) * * * Media server

2 1

One way communications in Kamailio 3.1.4
by CaptWho 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

I'm running 3.1.4 on centos and I'm having some trouble with voice only going one way. Both extensions will ring each other, but after they connect, voice will only travel in one direction. One extension hears fine, but can't talk. I've totally opened up the firewalls (including port 5060) and I'm still having the trouble. I'm not behind NAT. I've tried it using X-Lite, VoIP phones and ATAs in a number of combinations. The problem is across the board. X-Lite sometimes automatically disconnects after 32 seconds. Does anyone have any suggestions on where to look? ANY help appreciated. This has been going on for weeks. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/One-way-communications-in-Kamailio-3.1.4-tp32460597p3… Sent from the OpenSER Users Mailing List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 3

Open source HLR (Home Location Register).
by Henrik Aagaard Sørensen 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

I know this is the mailing list for Kamailio, but hopefully someone can help me out as it is "kinda" related to VoIP etc. Does anyone know any open source / free HLR implementation?

4 3

Siremis site access from Romania
by Dani Popa 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

Hi, There is any reasons why any linked Siremis site is not accessible from Romania ? i tried to access http://siremis.asipto.com/ and other sites and they are not accesible. Thanks, Dani Popa

4 6

Re: [SR-Users] planning v3.1.5
by Vitaliy Aleksandrov 16 Sep '11

16 Sep '11

There is a bug in UAC module. uac_req_send doesn't restore avps. I tried to backport your patch to 3.1 but with no success. Could you add this patch to a new stable release ?

2 9

DNS support
by CT Radu 15 Sep '11

15 Sep '11

Dear sirs and madams, I was wondering what is the current support for DNS fallback in the 3.1.x branch . Lets assume we have a new dialog started and the name in the To field needs to be resolved via a NAPTR. Kamailio sends a NAPTR request, gets 3 SRVs , each with a number of A or AAAA records. The best/most suitable SRV is selected, however no response is returned from any of the addresses in the A records. Now, we should go the second SRV and try the A records in there and so on. My question is how much from this kind of dns fallback algorithm is supported ? (I hope my explanation wasn't too confusing) Thank you, Costin Radu

2 1

OT: anyone in Bay Area
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

Hello, anyone here living/working in San Francisco/Bay Area that has a bit of time to assist me with some stuff? Reply to me for follow up. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Kamailio v3.1.5 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v3.1.5 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of latest stable branch, 3.1, that includes fixes since release of v3.1.4. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure. Deployments running previous v3.1.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v3.1.5. For more details about version 3.1.5, visit: http://www.kamailio.org/w/2011/09/kamailio-v3-1-5-released/ Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

preparing release of v3.1.5
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

Hello, today starting with 14:00 I will be preparing the release of v3.1.5. If any devel has commits to do in branch 3.1, please do it before to avoid conflicts. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 1

Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
by Dani Popa 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

SIP, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Dani Dani Popa Technical Manager at NECC Telecom Romania Confirm that you know Dani Popa: https://www.linkedin.com/e/-szw6fj-gskbz4q0-1q/isd/4204604361/O7PsXc0-/?hs=… -- You are receiving Invitation to Connect emails. Click to unsubscribe: http://www.linkedin.com/e/-szw6fj-gskbz4q0-1q/c6YlT3v6LB4U4BZW-5Wc20tVAQF44… (c) 2011 LinkedIn Corporation. 2029 Stierlin Ct, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.

1 0

Kamailio terminating after upgrading from 3.1.2 to 3.1.4
by Phillman25 Kyriacou 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

Hello Im facing a big problem after upgrading from version 3.1.2 to 3.1.4. The kamailio process keeps on terminating every now and then, this is what i was able to retrieve from my logs. Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 kernel: [71448.062089] __ratelimit: 15 callbacks suppressed Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 kernel: [71448.062096] kamailio[13963]: segfault at 14 ip 0816452a sp bfedc940 error 4 in kamailio[8048000+1d9000] Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13991]: : <core> [pass_fd.c:293]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 49 Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13907]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:741]: child process 13963 exited by a signal 11 Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13907]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:744]: core was generated Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13907]: INFO: <core> [main.c:756]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD Does anyone have an idea why this is happening? Your help is much appreciated! Regards Phillip

2 1

parse errors in rr-callback of path module
by Andreas Granig 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

Hi, path module calls register_rrcb when "use_received" is set to 1 to extract the "received=" param and set its content as dst-uri if present. Now I've noticed that when e.g. a message has a pre-loaded route like "Route: <sip:mydomain.com;lr>", then kamailio (at least 3.1.3) spits the following error message: /usr/sbin/kamailio[23953]: ERROR: <core> [parser/parse_param.c:481]: parse_params(): Invalid character, ; expected /usr/sbin/kamailio[23953]: ERROR: path [path.c:213]: failed to parse route parametes I was trying to reproduce this but without much success, it sometimes happens and sometimes not, but I can't yet put the finger on the reason. Any ideas? Andreas

3 8

planning v3.1.5
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 14 Sep '11

14 Sep '11

Hello, it's being quite some time since we released 3.1.4, so I am thinking of packaging soon v3.1.5 out of stable branch 3.1. My plan is to release it Wednesday, September 14, 2011. Any other opinions? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

6 6

Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?
by laura testi 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Hi, I am using the XCAP server of kamailio for contact list and presence rules. It seems it only support to update the whole xcap doc of the user but not the partial update. Can anyone tell me if the kamailio's xcap server support the partial update of a user's doc? for example, to remove a contact from the contact list or add a contact to the contact list without PUT or DELETE the whole xcap document of this user? If yes, what's the syntax of the HTTP request? Thank you very much in advanced Best Regards, Laura

3 12

max_contacts
by Rafael Rincon 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Hello Guys, Is there any chance to modify at running time (in a register event) the max_contacts parameter? I am running OpenSER version 1.4 . Regards, Rafael Rincon rrincon(a)ipcomnetwork.com +13054772902 x 111

4 7

cr default route
by caio 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Hello, The documentation of carrierroute says "If flags and mask are not zero, and no match to the message flags is possible, no routing will be done." Then is there any route entry which can act as default gw (like an always-match entry)? For example this 'carrierroute' table: +---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+------+ | carrier | domain | scan_prefix | flags | mask | +---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+------+ 1 | 1 | 1 | 156 | 500 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | | 0 | 0 | +---------+--------+-------------+-------+------+- Here if ruri is 156xx, and there is no flag set, then the cr module does not find a match because of the non-zero value in the flag column (entry 1). But I want to route this call via carrier1 domain1 and scan_prefix empty-value entry (entry 2). How can I set a default route entry here? Is possible with cr? Now I only find it possible via a pstn.def_gw_ip variable. Thank you, Claudio

2 3

wildcarded sip contacts
by Antanas Masevicius 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Hello everyone, been looking for a way to do sip wildcarded contact matching where contact could look like <sip:2222..@33.33.33.33:5060>. Current usrloc module does not implement any such matching, but it seems there is a new rfc 5947 issued regarding this problem. Maybe someone is already working on it? What options do i have in sip-router / kamailio besides LCR based ones ? I want to do local contact matching as fast as possible and without a need to reload lcr table. Antanas Masevicius NTT

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Fwd: configuration
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Hello, On 9/12/11 4:14 PM, neili ma wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks a lot for your advice, I found and solved the problem thanks to > the debugger, actually the problem was with > > modparam("auth_db", > "db_url","mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser") > > I just had to change localhost to my locationserver IP and the problem > was solved :), thanks again. good that you find it. Don't forget to cc the mailing list always so people reading the thread (archive later) see the conclusion -- it can help many others running on same situation. Cheers, Daniel > > Sincerely, > Neili > > > 2011/9/12 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com > <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> > > Hello, > > you have another group of actions that can send 401 Unauthorized: > > > if (!check_to()) { > sl_send_reply("401", "Unauthorized"); > exit; > } > > You can either run with debug=4 and watch the syslog to see some > hints in messages where it fires this 401, or use debugger module > with cfgtrace option set and you see the execution path of the > config in the logs. > > If you send here the ngrep of such REGISTER and the reply we can > spot what could be the situation for 401. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 9/11/11 9:18 PM, neili ma wrote: >> Hello sr-users, >> >> I'm new using kamailio open source, and I would like to ask for help. >> >> My version is 3.1.4 and I am trying to configure 3 servers, one >> with proxy, one with registrar and one with location server. >> >> My problem is when I try to send a register message it returns an >> error "401 Unauthorized", I know the error is in the fuction >> www_authorize("10.254.239.7", "subscriber") but I don't know how >> to solve it, for me it seems correct the parameters. >> >> Below I have attatched the proxy and registrar relevant route >> code for my problem, and the IPs for proxy an registrar are: >> 10.254.239.7-----------10.254.239.8 >> >> If someone can help me, I will be gratefull. Thanks in advance. >> >> ####REGISTRAR CODE >> >> route{ >> >> # initial sanity checks -- too long messages >> if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { >> sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); >> exit; >> }; >> >> if (!uri==myself) { >> sl_send_reply("400", "Bad destination, only >> register messages de$ >> exit; >> }; >> >> # the only valid message for the registrar is the register >> message >> # other messages are answered with an error message >> if (uri==myself) { >> >> if (method=="REGISTER") { >> >> sl_send_reply("100", "Trying"); >> >> if (!www_authorize("10.254.239.7", "subscriber")) { >> www_challenge("10.254.239.7", "1"); >> exit; >> }; >> >> if (!check_to()) { >> sl_send_reply("401", "Unauthorized"); >> exit; >> }; >> >> consume_credentials(); >> if(!save("location")) { >> sl_reply_error(); >> }; >> exit; >> } else { >> sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); >> exit; >> }; >> }; >> } >> >> #########PROXY CODE >> >> if (method=="ACK") { >> route(1); >> exit; >> } if (method=="INVITE") { >> route(3); >> exit; >> } else if (method=="REGISTER") { >> route(2); >> exit; >> }; >> >> lookup("aliases"); >> if (!uri==myself) { >> route(1); >> }; >> >> route[2] { >> #rewrinting the host allows the registrar to know that the >> message is de$ >> >> rewritehost("10.254.239.8"); >> if(!t_relay()) { >> sl_reply_error(); >> }; >> exit; >> } >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org> >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla --http://www.asipto.com > Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin:http://asipto.com/u/kat > http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda > > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

CANCEL is not processed in onsend_route
by Timo Klecker 13 Sep '11

13 Sep '11

Hello all, I want to log the incoming and outgoing CANCEL on my Kamailio. I tried with a call of sip_trace in the default route setflag(22); if (method == "CANCEL") { sip_trace(); if (t_check_trans()) { t_relay(); exit; } } This works great, I get the incoming CANCEL in the Database. But the outgoing CANCEL is not logged with flag set. So I tried to use onsend_route with the following lines: onsend_route { xlog("L_NOTICE", " SENDING from $si \n $mb \n "); if ( method == "CANCEL" ) sip_trace(); } I am using Kamailio Version 3.1.0 (with Patch for Siptrace in onsend_route by Daniel ). But the CANCEL is not processed in the onsend_route at all. I do not even see the xlog-line. But tcpdump gives me the CANCEL outgoing. Following callflow: INVITE > 100 < > INVITE < 100 < 180 180 < CANCEL> > CANCEL I am missing the last CANCEL. Why is the CANCEL not logged with flag 22 set? Why is the CANCEL not processed in the onsend_route? Greetings Timo

3 4

question bout UA and BOX in same NAT
by MingHon 12 Sep '11

12 Sep '11

Hello List, Can i have UA in the same nat with the box and also UA in different nat at the same time? My box is currrently working behind nat with ip 192.168.2.3 and advertised_address is set to sip.mydomain.com is it possible to append the via header replace the sip.mydomain.com to 192.168.2.3 ? Thanks, -- Regards, MingHon

2 4

no publish from pua/pua_mi to outbound proxy
by Juha Heinanen 12 Sep '11

12 Sep '11

i started to test sr presence and for some reason sr does not send out any publish request when i issue one via pua_mi. i have in route [xmlrpc_requests]: xlog("L_INFO", "Handling XMLRPC $rm from <$si> with body <$(rb{re.subst,/[\n\r\t]//g})>\n"); set_reply_no_connect(); set_reply_close(); dispatch_rpc(); syslog shows that sr receives xmlrpc request: Aug 29 19:42:13 sip /usr/sbin/pres-serv[2118]: INFO: Handling XMLRPC POST from <127.0.0.1> with body <<?xml version='1.0'?><methodCall><methodName>mi</methodName><params><param><value><string>pua_publish</string></value></param><param><value><string>sip:jh@vm.test.fi</string></value></param><param><value><int>7776000</int></value></param><param><value><string>message-summary</string></value></param><param><value><string>application/simple-message-summary</string></value></param><param><value><string>.</string></value></param><param><value><string>a.1313821931.6178.2.0</string></value></param><param><value><string>P-Flags: 0</string></value></param><param><value><string>Messages-Waiting:yesVoice-Message: 1/1 (0/0)</string></value></param></params></methodCall>> and wireshark shows that sr xmlrpc server responds to it with 200 ok. but after than nothing happens, i.e., according to wireshark no publish request is sent out. i have pua and pua_mi modules loaded and outbound proxy defined: modparam("pua", "outbound_proxy", "sip:127.0.0.1:5082") there is no error messages in syslog. any idea why sr does not send publish to outbound proxy? this used to work with opensips. -- juha

2 13

Nat problems
by David Zambrano 12 Sep '11

12 Sep '11

Hi Ive been trying to configure kamailio as a loadbalancer between two transcoders that afterwards send all calls to a softswitch but I currently have two problems. My first and most important one is a NAT problem or so I think. All calls in UDP work perfectly but when dealing with calls in TCP only outgoing calls work, no incoming calls work. After doing some traces on the network I realized that the transcoder is trying to reach the router in front of the softphone and skipping the Kamailio loadbalancer. The call never reaches the softphone so the phonecall never completes. In UDP exactly the same thing happens, the call skips the Kamailio loadbalancer but the call completes perfectly fine. The other detail has to do with the actual loadbalancing and failover. I was using the weight distribution and it works great except its sending the same CSeq to both transcoders and then the softswitch is receiving it twice and an error pops up at the softphone Ive been using saying theres a duplicate CSeq. I was using the forward() command after the dispatcher arguments. I changed it to the t_relay() and it works as in it doesnt send the same CSeq twice but instead a unique one to each transcoder so the Softswitch stopped winning but then the failover doesnt work. Whenever it one goes down its till trying to reach it. Im using roundrobin in the dispatcher config because I noticed it doesnt send stuff to both transcoders but only to the transcoder its going to actually use. I started to read that for failover I need the user_avp module which I didnt install but then I wonder how come failover worked before? Thanks for your help Cheers David

3 7

Fwd: configuration
by neili ma 12 Sep '11

12 Sep '11

Hello sr-users, I'm new using kamailio open source, and I would like to ask for help. My version is 3.1.4 and I am trying to configure 3 servers, one with proxy, one with registrar and one with location server. My problem is when I try to send a register message it returns an error "401 Unauthorized", I know the error is in the fuction www_authorize("10.254.239.7", "subscriber") but I don't know how to solve it, for me it seems correct the parameters. Below I have attatched the proxy and registrar relevant route code for my problem, and the IPs for proxy an registrar are: 10.254.239.7-----------10.254.239.8 If someone can help me, I will be gratefull. Thanks in advance. ####REGISTRAR CODE route{ # initial sanity checks -- too long messages if (msg:len >= 2048 ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); exit; }; if (!uri==myself) { sl_send_reply("400", "Bad destination, only register messages de$ exit; }; # the only valid message for the registrar is the register message # other messages are answered with an error message if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { sl_send_reply("100", "Trying"); if (!www_authorize("10.254.239.7", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("10.254.239.7", "1"); exit; }; if (!check_to()) { sl_send_reply("401", "Unauthorized"); exit; }; consume_credentials(); if(!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit; } else { sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); exit; }; }; } #########PROXY CODE if (method=="ACK") { route(1); exit; } if (method=="INVITE") { route(3); exit; } else if (method=="REGISTER") { route(2); exit; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { route(1); }; route[2] { #rewrinting the host allows the registrar to know that the message is de$ rewritehost("10.254.239.8"); if(!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; exit; }

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 3.0.4 is crashed
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 Sep '11

12 Sep '11

Hello, try to keep the mailing list cc-ed -- others may be able to help you faster or this discussion will be helpful for different people. The username_spec and password_spec were removed indeed, the first was useless since the username was taken from auth header and the second became parameter to pv_www_authenticate, see: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules/auth.html#pv_www_authenticate You simply have to use something like: if (!pv_www_authenticate("$td", "$var(password)", "0")) { www_challenge("$td", "0"); exit; } Cheers, Daniel On 9/10/11 12:51 PM, Khoa Phuong Viet Ngo wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks Daniel for your answer. > > It's very helpful for me :). > > Actually i tried with using kamailio 3.1.4 (lastest kamailio) but i > got the problem with auth module and parameter with auth module. > Because some parameters at auth module have changed. > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/auth.html [3.1.4] > > But in 3.0.4 kamailio, i am using auth module with these parameter and > it had error with new kamailio (3.1.4) . :( > > kamailio.cfg > > ######################################################## > loadmodule auth.so > > # ----- auth params ----- > modparam("auth", "username_spec", "$var(username)") > modparam("auth", "password_spec", "$var(password)") > modparam("auth", "calculate_ha1", 1) > > route[AUTH] { > $var(utype) = 0; > #!ifdef WITH_AUTH > if (is_method("REGISTER")) > { > if(is_present_hf("Authorization")) > { > # authenticate the REGISTER requests (uncomment to enable > auth) > if(!route(GETPASSWD)) > { > www_challenge("", "0"); > exit; > } > if(!pv_www_authorize("")) > { > www_challenge(""/*realm*/,"0"/*qop*/); > exit; > } > } else { > www_challenge("", "0"); > exit; > } > } else { > $var(srcgrp) = allow_source_address_group(); > if ($var(srcgrp) > 0) { > # src ip allowed > $var(utype) = 1; > if($var(srcgrp)!=100) > { > $rd = $Ri; > $fs = "udp:" + $Ri + ":5062"; > } > return 1; > } > # authenticate if from local subscriber (uncomment to enable auth) > if (from_uri==myself) > { > if(is_present_hf("Proxy-Authorization")) > { > # authenticate the non-REGISTER requests (uncomment to > enable auth) > if(!route(GETPASSWD)) > { > proxy_challenge("", "0"); > exit; > } > if(!pv_proxy_authorize("")) > { > proxy_challenge(""/*realm*/,"0"/*qop*/); > exit; > } > } else { > proxy_challenge("", "0"); > exit; > } > $var(utype) = 2; > consume_credentials(); > # caller authenticated > } > } > #!endif > return; > } > > ##################################################### > > Error logs: > > Sep 6 19:37:01 CorePBX kamailio: ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:150]: > set_mod_param_regex: parameter <username_spec> not found in module <auth> > Sep 6 19:37:01 CorePBX kamailio: : <core> [cfg.y:3419]: parse error > in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 260, column > 51: Can't set module parameter > Sep 6 19:37:01 CorePBX kamailio: ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:150]: > set_mod_param_regex: parameter <password_spec> not found in module <auth> > Sep 6 19:37:01 CorePBX kamailio: : <core> [cfg.y:3419]: parse error > in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 261, column > 51: Can't set module parameter > Sep 6 19:37:01 CorePBX kamailio: ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:150]: > set_mod_param_regex: parameter <calculate_ha1> not found in module <auth> > Sep 6 19:37:01 CorePBX kamailio: : <core> [cfg.y:3419]: parse error > in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 262, column > 36: Can't set module parameter > Sep 6 19:37:01 CorePBX kamailio: : <core> [cfg.y:3419]: parse error > in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 562, column > 27: unknown command, missing loadmodule? > Sep 6 19:37:01 CorePBX kamailio: : <core> [cfg.y:3419]: parse error > in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 594, column > 30: unknown command, missing loadmodule? > Sep 6 19:37:39 CorePBX kamailio: ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:150]: > set_mod_param_regex: parameter <username_spec> not found in module <auth> > Sep 6 19:37:39 CorePBX kamailio: : <core> [cfg.y:3419]: parse error > in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 260, column > 51: Can't set module parameter > Sep 6 19:37:39 CorePBX kamailio: ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:150]: > set_mod_param_regex: parameter <password_spec> not found in module <auth> > Sep 6 19:37:39 CorePBX kamailio: : <core> [cfg.y:3419]: parse error > in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 261, column > 51: Can't set module parameter > Sep 6 19:37:39 CorePBX kamailio: ERROR: <core> [modparam.c:150]: > set_mod_param_regex: parameter <calculate_ha1> not found in module <auth> > > ######################################################## > > I appreciate all your help on this case. > > Thanks Daniel, > KhoaNVP > > > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla > <miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hello, > > it seems like a buffer overflow happened previously, since the > crash is in malloc. Do you get any error messages is syslog? Can > you recompile with QM_DBG_MALLOC like explained in the next link > and try again watching the syslog messages? > http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/troubleshooting:memory > > On another hand, 3.0.4 is quite old, why are not using 3.1.4, it > is far more updated than 3.0 series -- we are just to release > first in 3.2 series. Upgrading from 3.0 to 3.1 is rather trivial. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On 9/9/11 8:38 PM, KhoaNVP wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I hope you can help me with this issues. > I'm working with kamailio 3.0.4 and when i implement the call > via kamailio > after 1-->3 mins , kamailio is crashed. > > It's my debug from core log. > > Core was generated by `kamailio -E -ddd'. > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > #0 fm_malloc (qm=0x88c860, size=<value optimized out>) at > mem/f_malloc.c:382 > 382 *f=frag->u.nxt_free; > (gdb) qt > Undefined command: "qt". Try "help". > (gdb) bt > #0 fm_malloc (qm=0x88c860, size=<value optimized out>) at > mem/f_malloc.c:382 > #1 0x000000000041fd27 in dup_lump_list_r (l=0x9275f8, > dir=LD_AFTER, > error=0x7fff23bd661c) at data_lump.c:453 > #2 0x000000000041ffa9 in dup_lump_list_r (l=0x927640, > dir=LD_AFTER, > error=0x7fff23bd666c) at data_lump.c:476 > #3 0x000000000041ff6d in dup_lump_list_r (l=0x926db0, > dir=<value optimized > out>, error=0x7fff23bd66b4) at data_lump.c:465 > #4 0x0000000000420058 in dup_lump_list (l=0x88c860) at > data_lump.c:508 > #5 0x00002b8b2efb858d in prepare_new_uac (t=0x2b8b3218ffa8, > i_req=0x926ef0, > branch=0, uri=0x927150, path=0x9274d0, next_hop=<value > optimized out>, > fsocket=0x0, snd_flags=0 '\000', fproto=0, flags=0) at > t_fwd.c:242 > #6 0x00002b8b2efb94c7 in add_uac (t=0x2b8b3218ffa8, > request=0x926ef0, > uri=0x927150, next_hop=0x7, path=0x9274d0, proxy=0x0, fsocket=0x0, > snd_flags=0 '\000', proto=0, flags=0) at t_fwd.c:679 > #7 0x00002b8b2efbce7a in t_forward_nonack (t=0x2b8b3218ffa8, > p_msg=0x926ef0, proxy=0x0, proto=0) at t_fwd.c:1340 > #8 0x00002b8b2efb4996 in t_relay_to (p_msg=0x926ef0, > proxy=0x0, proto=0, > replicate=0) at t_funcs.c:358 > #9 0x0000000000413489 in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd71e0, a=0x8be788, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:860 > #10 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd71e0, > a=0x8be788, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 > #11 0x00000000004161e7 in run_actions_safe (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > a=0x38, > msg=0x88ca08) at action.c:1370 > #12 0x000000000049696b in rval_get_int (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > msg=0x88ca08, > i=0x7fff23bd75dc, rv=0x7, cache=0x7) at rvalue.c:897 > #13 0x000000000049b7fc in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > msg=0x926ef0, res=0x7fff23bd75dc, rve=0x8be878) at rvalue.c:1841 > #14 0x000000000049b8ad in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > msg=0x926ef0, res=0x7fff23bd79d8, rve=0x8bef48) at rvalue.c:1848 > #15 0x0000000000411d49 in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8bf798, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:834 > #16 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > a=0x8be608, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 > #17 0x0000000000413084 in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8f6060, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:479 > #18 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > a=0x8f6060, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 > #19 0x0000000000411dab in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8f62d0, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:853 > #20 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > a=0x8f62d0, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 > #21 0x0000000000413084 in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8bd698, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:479 > #22 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > a=0x8bd398, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 > #23 0x0000000000411dab in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8bd788, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:853 > #24 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, > a=0x8a1340, > msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 > #25 0x0000000000416174 in run_top_route (a=0x8a1340, > msg=0x926ef0, c=<value > optimized out>) at action.c:1391 > #26 0x000000000048009c in receive_msg (buf=0x57e779 "DEBUG", > len=<value > optimized out>, rcv_info=0x7fff23bd8e20) at receive.c:196 > #27 0x000000000050698b in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:520 > #28 0x0000000000455e2f in main_loop () at main.c:1447 > #29 0x0000000000456f32 in main (argc=<value optimized out>, > argv=0x7fff23bd90e8) at main.c:2251 > (gdb) > > > Thanks with all the help, > Khoa > > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com > Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat > http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda > > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Kamailio 3.0.4 is crashed
by KhoaNVP 10 Sep '11

10 Sep '11

Hi everyone, I hope you can help me with this issues. I'm working with kamailio 3.0.4 and when i implement the call via kamailio after 1-->3 mins , kamailio is crashed. It's my debug from core log. Core was generated by `kamailio -E -ddd'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 fm_malloc (qm=0x88c860, size=<value optimized out>) at mem/f_malloc.c:382 382 *f=frag->u.nxt_free; (gdb) qt Undefined command: "qt". Try "help". (gdb) bt #0 fm_malloc (qm=0x88c860, size=<value optimized out>) at mem/f_malloc.c:382 #1 0x000000000041fd27 in dup_lump_list_r (l=0x9275f8, dir=LD_AFTER, error=0x7fff23bd661c) at data_lump.c:453 #2 0x000000000041ffa9 in dup_lump_list_r (l=0x927640, dir=LD_AFTER, error=0x7fff23bd666c) at data_lump.c:476 #3 0x000000000041ff6d in dup_lump_list_r (l=0x926db0, dir=<value optimized out>, error=0x7fff23bd66b4) at data_lump.c:465 #4 0x0000000000420058 in dup_lump_list (l=0x88c860) at data_lump.c:508 #5 0x00002b8b2efb858d in prepare_new_uac (t=0x2b8b3218ffa8, i_req=0x926ef0, branch=0, uri=0x927150, path=0x9274d0, next_hop=<value optimized out>, fsocket=0x0, snd_flags=0 '\000', fproto=0, flags=0) at t_fwd.c:242 #6 0x00002b8b2efb94c7 in add_uac (t=0x2b8b3218ffa8, request=0x926ef0, uri=0x927150, next_hop=0x7, path=0x9274d0, proxy=0x0, fsocket=0x0, snd_flags=0 '\000', proto=0, flags=0) at t_fwd.c:679 #7 0x00002b8b2efbce7a in t_forward_nonack (t=0x2b8b3218ffa8, p_msg=0x926ef0, proxy=0x0, proto=0) at t_fwd.c:1340 #8 0x00002b8b2efb4996 in t_relay_to (p_msg=0x926ef0, proxy=0x0, proto=0, replicate=0) at t_funcs.c:358 #9 0x0000000000413489 in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd71e0, a=0x8be788, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:860 #10 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd71e0, a=0x8be788, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 #11 0x00000000004161e7 in run_actions_safe (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x38, msg=0x88ca08) at action.c:1370 #12 0x000000000049696b in rval_get_int (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, msg=0x88ca08, i=0x7fff23bd75dc, rv=0x7, cache=0x7) at rvalue.c:897 #13 0x000000000049b7fc in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, msg=0x926ef0, res=0x7fff23bd75dc, rve=0x8be878) at rvalue.c:1841 #14 0x000000000049b8ad in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, msg=0x926ef0, res=0x7fff23bd79d8, rve=0x8bef48) at rvalue.c:1848 #15 0x0000000000411d49 in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8bf798, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:834 #16 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8be608, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 #17 0x0000000000413084 in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8f6060, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:479 #18 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8f6060, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 #19 0x0000000000411dab in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8f62d0, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:853 #20 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8f62d0, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 #21 0x0000000000413084 in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8bd698, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:479 #22 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8bd398, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 #23 0x0000000000411dab in do_action (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8bd788, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:853 #24 0x0000000000415e03 in run_actions (h=0x7fff23bd8bb0, a=0x8a1340, msg=0x926ef0) at action.c:1315 #25 0x0000000000416174 in run_top_route (a=0x8a1340, msg=0x926ef0, c=<value optimized out>) at action.c:1391 #26 0x000000000048009c in receive_msg (buf=0x57e779 "DEBUG", len=<value optimized out>, rcv_info=0x7fff23bd8e20) at receive.c:196 #27 0x000000000050698b in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:520 #28 0x0000000000455e2f in main_loop () at main.c:1447 #29 0x0000000000456f32 in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=0x7fff23bd90e8) at main.c:2251 (gdb) Thanks with all the help, Khoa -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Kamailio-3.0.4-is-crashed-tp32433892p32433892.html Sent from the OpenSER Users Mailing List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

Error reading AVP
by Carlos Ruiz Diaz 09 Sep '11

09 Sep '11

Hello. I'm currently developing an OpenSER module which does some business logic for the company I work for. For compatibility reasons we are working with openser-1.2.2-tls and we haven't been able to upgrade to newer version yet. In one block of the code I have to read an avp which is written inside the openser.cfg script using: OPENSER: avp_copy("sip:123@123.123.123:5060", "$avp(s:selectedroute)/g"); C CODE: if (is_response && is_invite_seq) { struct usr_avp* destavp = NULL; int_str destval; const str selected_route = { "selectedroute", 13 }; int attempts = 1, max_attempts = 3; for ( destavp = search_first_avp(AVP_NAME_STR | AVP_VAL_STR, (int_str) selected_route, NULL, 0); destavp != NULL; destavp = search_next_avp(destavp, NULL) ) { get_avp_val(destavp, &destval); } } The problem is that "selectedroute" avp cannot be found so I can't read its value. This happens sporadically and most of the time the code works just fine. I also checked for the list of available AVPs using get_avp_list() but it reports an empty list. Is there another way to read AVPs or is there something I'm missing which is causing this problem? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks in advance! Carlos.

2 2

10 Years SER Conference - Presentations
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 Sep '11

08 Sep '11

Hello, the presentations from 10 Years SER Conference I received so far were uploaded at: * http://www.kamailio.org/events/2011-10yearsSER/ Expect the rest during the next days. The recording of the talk about Gemeinschaft 4 by Stefan Wintermeyer is available on youtube: * http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbGn5N_y4rw Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways - Solution
by Sarat C. Vemuri 07 Sep '11

07 Sep '11

I think I have this working. For anyone else trying to do similar thing (or placing Kamailio behind FW/NAT), here is my cookbook. We are trying to setup the following: [UAS] <------> (PubIP)[FireWall/One-to-OneNAT]<-------->(PrivIP)[Kamailio/RTPProxy](PrivIP)<---------->(PrivIP2)[UAC] UAC/UAS cannot reach each other directly. For simplicity I am running RTPProxy on same machines as Kamailio. But this can be changed. Versions/Patches/fixes you need if you are running 3.1.2 : (Trunk/3.2 has these): a. Fixed forward.c for mhome to work properly (included in 3.1.4). b. rr module from trunk to be able to use 2 strings for record_route_preset c. Patched rtpproxy module to actually use the forced ip supplied to force_rtp_proxy. Patch at the end of this message d. rtpproxy version 1.2.1 What to do: 1. Setup FW/NAT rules to map public IP to PrivateIP and allow communications to/from UAS 2. Setup RTPProxy in "bridged" mode (e.g -F -l 10.10.5.90/10.10.5.90 -s udp:10.10.5.90:9005) listening on PrivateIP. 3. Setup the config file to: a. Setup modparams to make the above rtpproxy available. Use set_rtp_proxy_set if you have more than one instance. b. Do the following where you are processing Outbound *initial* invite (i.e. check totag) (Call from UAC to UAS) set_advertised_address("YourPublicIP "); if(!has_totag()) { record_route_preset("YourPublicIP:5060;r2=on;nat=yes","YourPrivateIp:5060;r2=on;nat=yes"); } force_rtp_proxy("ocfaei"," YourPublicIP "); c. Do the following where you are processing Inbound invite (Call from UAS to UAC) if(!has_totag()) { record_route_preset("YourPrivateIP:5060;r2=on;nat=yes", "YourPublicIp:5060;r2=on;nat=yes"); } force_rtp_proxy("ocfaei"); d. Do the following where you are processing replies (180/183/2XX) For Inbound Calls force_rtp_proxy("ocfa","YourPublicIP"); For Outbound Calls force_rtp_proxy("ocfa"); e. Unforce RTPProxy on BYE or Failures. Do not use record_route in the above scenario. If you have it now, remove it or make sure it doesn't get called for this specific case. Explanation: In #b, you are fixing the Via headers to use public IP, setting Record-Route headers so that ACK/RE-INVITE can find way back and are force fixing SDP with public IP for outbound calls. In #c, You are doing same thing except no need to fix Via and the route set is reversed. No need to force fix SDP either since it is figured out automatically. In #d, You are force fixing the SDP to use the public IP for inbound or usual for outbound so that the audio stream from UAS can be relayed. The r2=on parameter is required (as well as enabling double rr, which is default) so that the proxy can deal with the route sets properly Hope the above helps others. SV. Rtpproxy Path 2226,2233c2226 < LM_DBG("Str2 is %s\n", str2); < if(str2) { < newip.s = str2; < LM_DBG("NewIp is %s\n", newip.s); < } < else { < newip.s = (argc < 2) ? str2 : argv[1]; < } --- > newip.s = (argc < 2) ? str2 : argv[1];

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways
by Sarat C. Vemuri 07 Sep '11

07 Sep '11

Ovidiu, Thanks for your time. The "fixes" I pulled in is the latest rr module only. I didn't see anything in that diff to make this work. Could you elaborate a little? However, I was able to get "Outbound" working properly by adding ";r2=on" to the record_route_preset IPs. In going through the source code, I noticed that this is what regular record_route uses to enable double rr and it would automatically take both headers out if it sees that. That seems to have worked. Any pitfals with this? I am still working on "Inbound". For some reason my carrier GW keeps resending invites even after receiving ACK. I need to see if it is an issue with the carrier. Thanks SV. -----Original Message----- From: Ovidiu Sas [mailto:osas@voipembedded.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:50 AM To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways It seems that something is miss configured on your server. The fixes that I made in the trunk (and you pulled in your local 3.1 repo) were designed to handle the scenario that you are trying to implement. The ACK should be handled properly and routed to the upstream carrier (following the same path as the initial INVITE). Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Sarat C. Vemuri <sarat.vemuri(a)fthco.com> wrote: > Again, I apologize for this clumsy way of replying. > > Ovidiu, > > Thanks for the pointer on set_advertised_address. I had to patch rtpproxy module (and rr module for the two parameters to request_route_preset) since I am running 3.1. > > However, I still have a problem with ACKs after following what you suggested. > > INVITE from Internal to Carrier routes properly (two Request-Route headers, one internal IP and other public IP). On 200 OK, the carrier GW properly copies the route set in to Route header. Now the route contains two entries, the public IP and the private IP of Kamailio. The Internal UAC then sends the ACK back to Kamailio. Everything is fine till this point. Now, Kamailio removes the top entry, which is the private IP and then promptly sends the ACK to the public IP of itself!. Of course, that doesn't go anywhere. > > How do I remove the "public IP" entry from the route set before forwarding the reply to Internal UAC? Is there another way to deal with this? I've tried to set an alias= core parameter with the public IP, but doesn't seem to have any effect. The public IP is not reachable from internal network. > > Thanks for your help > > SV. > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 16:44:22 -0700 > From: Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple > carrier gateways - some via Firewall/NAT > To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> > Message-ID: > > <CAND0Lkt_dpcTm2WKMywMhX6rdsX1ia0r=LYrzB1WfX3oN32Wrg(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > It is feasable to what you want: kamailio behind NAT proxying traffic > from/to public internet to/from private network. > You will need to properly craft the INVITE and use proper record route headers. > Use set_advertised_address when needed: > http://kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:3.1.x#set_advertis > ed_address Also, use record_route_preset (note that there are two > parameters): > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules_k/rr.html#id2547566 > > That should do it. You don't need any patches for rtpproxy. > Just use force_rtpp_proxy (and force the IP address): > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/rtpproxy.html#id2546034 > > > Note: Make sure that you understand how in-dialog requests are routed > by a proxy in order to know how to properly handle the initial INVITE. > > > Regards, > Ovidiu Sas > > On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Sarat C. Vemuri <sarat.vemuri(a)fthco.com> wrote: >> We are trying to configure Kamailio ?(3.1.x) as a ?boarder proxy? >> where it acts as the front for various carrier gateways so that >> internal UACs and UASs are unaware of the carrier gateways. >> >> >> >> Let me try to present a clear picture of our setup. >> >> 1.?????? Kamailio has several NICs (physical or vlan).? Each on a >> different subnet. One subnet is internal/has routes for internal.? >> Other subnets are private connections to carriers or a ?route to public Internet. >> >> 2.?????? All of these subnets are non-routable from Internet. In >> addition , the carrier private connections are not routable internally. >> >> 3.?????? Connection to public internet is via a FW/NAT (one-to-one >> NAT), which maps to one of the interfaces. >> >> 4.?????? All internal? UAC/UAS connect on the internal subnet. >> >> 5.?????? We are using RTPProxy? (at least one instance per carrier) >> to relay media between internal and carrier subnets >> >> >> >> We are able to make this setup up work great except for one >> scenario.? One of the carriers is only reachable via public >> Internet.? Due to security requirements, our Kamailio cannot have a >> public IP address and must use FW/NAT. I guess this scenario is >> ??Proxy behind NAT? and not really encouraged. But I would like to >> see if there is a way to make this work.? We cannot use the >> ?advertised_address? since it changes the IP for every ?route?. >> >> >> >> We were able to get this mostly ?working by doing the following >> >> 1.?????? mhomed=1 >> >> 2.?????? Small patch in the rtpproxy module so that ?force_rtp_proxy >> actually uses the IP address passed (public IP). >> >> 3.?????? Using request_route_preset(?publicIP?) >> >> >> >> The above ?mostly? works.? By that I mean, the INVITE transaction is >> properly passed between internal UAS and carrier SBC and the call is setup. >> However, further transactions (BYE/re-INVITE) etc do not work >> properly. So, far-end hangups are not ?working etc. >> >> >> >> I?ve searched various archives of this and other SER lists looking to >> see if anyone was able to get this scenario working, but couldn?t >> find a definitive answer.? Most of them point to using ?advertised_address?. >> >> >> >> So, and ideas on how to make ?Proxy behind NAT? work without using >> advertised_address?? Am I wasting my time? >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. >> >> >> >> SV. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing > list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >

2 1

permanent usrloc entries in Kamailio
by Klaus Darilion 07 Sep '11

07 Sep '11

Hi! Recently I had a problem with permanent usrloc entries when upgrading a server from SER 0.9 to Kamailio 3.1. Obviously the problem was that the permanent entries had "flag=128" and now expires=0 is used, see old thread: http://old.nabble.com/usrloc-permanent-records-and-strptime-td17668417.html The strange thing is, that even setting the expiry to 2099-0...... did not worked and Kamailio deleted the "expired" entries. Only setting it to "1970-01-01 01:00:00" worked. Any ideas what could been wrong? Further I wonder why Kamailio uses 01:00:00 for the permanent entry? The server is currently running in timezon CEST (UTC+2), thus IMO 02:00:00 would be more logical. Above thread also mentions problems with day-light-saving changes. Are there really problems? How do you solve those problems? I think the best workaround is to set system time always to UTC. Thanks Klaus

2 2

Siremis User Role permissions
by Camila Troncoso 07 Sep '11

07 Sep '11

Hi, I have a question about the assignment of Role permissions to limit some Users privileges in Siremis. I defined a user , and then a Role denying some actions, but I couldn’t deny the action from de SER menu . The Role permissions only show the modules on Application Menu from Administration Tab . What if I want to deny access to some items inside SER Menu , like modifying the ACL services or /and Rounting services? Regards, *Camila Troncoso **|* Ingeniero de Desarrollo VoissNet S.A. *|*ctroncoso(a)redvoiss.net Santiago - Chile *|* +56 2 2408535 www.redvoiss.net

2 1

Check disconnected users
by Anto 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Hello I want to store in a file access and disconnections to the system. To access (registrar), I thought scheduling a perl script and executed with the perl module, the problem I find with disconnections. Since the user can be disconnected for various reasons, had planned to do a script that runs an SQL table location and according to the expires field, see if disconnection has occurred or not. Would have to run this script in cron every X minutes. Is there a simpler way to check this or have Kamailio some function for it?. Thank you. Best regards

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways
by Sarat C. Vemuri 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Again, I apologize for this clumsy way of replying. Ovidiu, Thanks for the pointer on set_advertised_address. I had to patch rtpproxy module (and rr module for the two parameters to request_route_preset) since I am running 3.1. However, I still have a problem with ACKs after following what you suggested. INVITE from Internal to Carrier routes properly (two Request-Route headers, one internal IP and other public IP). On 200 OK, the carrier GW properly copies the route set in to Route header. Now the route contains two entries, the public IP and the private IP of Kamailio. The Internal UAC then sends the ACK back to Kamailio. Everything is fine till this point. Now, Kamailio removes the top entry, which is the private IP and then promptly sends the ACK to the public IP of itself!. Of course, that doesn't go anywhere. How do I remove the "public IP" entry from the route set before forwarding the reply to Internal UAC? Is there another way to deal with this? I've tried to set an alias= core parameter with the public IP, but doesn't seem to have any effect. The public IP is not reachable from internal network. Thanks for your help SV. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 16:44:22 -0700 From: Ovidiu Sas <osas(a)voipembedded.com> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways - some via Firewall/NAT To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Message-ID: <CAND0Lkt_dpcTm2WKMywMhX6rdsX1ia0r=LYrzB1WfX3oN32Wrg(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 It is feasable to what you want: kamailio behind NAT proxying traffic from/to public internet to/from private network. You will need to properly craft the INVITE and use proper record route headers. Use set_advertised_address when needed: http://kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:3.1.x#set_advertised_ad… Also, use record_route_preset (note that there are two parameters): http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules_k/rr.html#id2547566 That should do it. You don't need any patches for rtpproxy. Just use force_rtpp_proxy (and force the IP address): http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/rtpproxy.html#id2546034 Note: Make sure that you understand how in-dialog requests are routed by a proxy in order to know how to properly handle the initial INVITE. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Sarat C. Vemuri <sarat.vemuri(a)fthco.com> wrote: > We are trying to configure Kamailio ?(3.1.x) as a ?boarder proxy? where it > acts as the front for various carrier gateways so that internal UACs and > UASs are unaware of the carrier gateways. > > > > Let me try to present a clear picture of our setup. > > 1.?????? Kamailio has several NICs (physical or vlan).? Each on a different > subnet. One subnet is internal/has routes for internal.? Other subnets are > private connections to carriers or a ?route to public Internet. > > 2.?????? All of these subnets are non-routable from Internet. In addition , > the carrier private connections are not routable internally. > > 3.?????? Connection to public internet is via a FW/NAT (one-to-one NAT), > which maps to one of the interfaces. > > 4.?????? All internal? UAC/UAS connect on the internal subnet. > > 5.?????? We are using RTPProxy? (at least one instance per carrier) to relay > media between internal and carrier subnets > > > > We are able to make this setup up work great except for one scenario.? One > of the carriers is only reachable via public Internet.? Due to security > requirements, our Kamailio cannot have a public IP address and must use > FW/NAT. I guess this scenario is ??Proxy behind NAT? and not really > encouraged. But I would like to see if there is a way to make this work.? We > cannot use the ?advertised_address? since it changes the IP for every > ?route?. > > > > We were able to get this mostly ?working by doing the following > > 1.?????? mhomed=1 > > 2.?????? Small patch in the rtpproxy module so that ?force_rtp_proxy > actually uses the IP address passed (public IP). > > 3.?????? Using request_route_preset(?publicIP?) > > > > The above ?mostly? works.? By that I mean, the INVITE transaction is > properly passed between internal UAS and carrier SBC and the call is setup. > However, further transactions (BYE/re-INVITE) etc do not work properly. So, > far-end hangups are not ?working etc. > > > > I?ve searched various archives of this and other SER lists looking to see if > anyone was able to get this scenario working, but couldn?t find a definitive > answer.? Most of them point to using ?advertised_address?. > > > > So, and ideas on how to make ?Proxy behind NAT? work without using > advertised_address?? Am I wasting my time? > > > > Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. > > > > SV. > > > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >

3 2

KAMAILIO RTP PROXY
by Phillman25 Kyriacou 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Hi I want to use Kamailio to handle both signalling and media always. My scenario is the following PSTN==>KAMAILIO==>ASTERISK. I have a dialplan that points to ASTERISK when a call comes into Kamailio. Signalling is fine, however i cant seem to get the Media to work, i have installed the RTPPROXY as suggested by RTPPROXY module and have implemented it into the routing logic, however i have one way audio. The PSTN side cannot hear anything. I dont use the Kamailio for sip registrations or for users behind NAT. I just use a simple dialplan for forwarding SIP messages to our certain VOIP carriers, however some of our carriers request that we use both signalling and media from the same IP thats why i need to implement this scenario. Is this possible? Thanking you in advance for your help! Phillip

2 1

db_mysql "Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now "
by MÉSZÁROS Mihály 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Hi, I am using the git version of kamailio, and i am experiencing problem This message is repeated in log with all kind of mysql query (insert/delete/select) Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:124]: driver error on query: Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:103]: error while submitting query Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: usrloc [udomain.c:570]: db_query failed Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:124]: driver error on query: Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:186]: error while submitting query Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: usrloc [ucontact.c:513]: inserting contact in db failed Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:474]: failed to insert in database Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: registrar [save.c:430]: failed to insert contact Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: db_mysql [km_dbase.c:124]: driver error on query: Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: <core> [db_query.c:242]: error while submitting query Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: usrloc [urecord.c:426]: failed to delete from database Aug 27 22:04:05 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[25681]: ERROR: usrloc [udomain.c:896]: DB delete failed I am using stable debian so db_mysql.so linked with libmysqlclient.so.16 I read mysql doc and it is saying about this error the following: "Commands out of sync; you can't run this command now" http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/commands-out-of-sync.html So this problem cause it that not freed the last result. Only one assumption: Could it related to this change: http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=commitdiff;h=df… Any help appreciated. Regards, Misi

3 18

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways
by Sarat C. Vemuri 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Alex, Sorry about this clumsy way of replying, but I am stuck with Outlook 2010 and Exchange. You stated the problem correctly. Carrier GWs (UAS) and internal clients (UAC) cannot reach each other directly (TCP/UDP). They have to go through Kamailio and rtpproxy. I am goint to reply to Ovidiu as well with some more details. Thanks SV. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 19:12:38 -0400 From: Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways - some via Firewall/NAT To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Message-ID: <4E62B466.20808(a)evaristesys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed On 09/03/2011 05:53 PM, Sarat C. Vemuri wrote: > 3.Using request_route_preset(?publicIP?) > > The above ?mostly? works. By that I mean, the INVITE transaction is > properly passed between internal UAS and carrier SBC and the call is > setup. However, further transactions (BYE/re-INVITE) etc do not work > properly. So, far-end hangups are not working etc. So in other words, there is no interface to which Kamailio could be bound on a network that both the UAC and the UAS have direct network and transport-layer reachability to? If I understand correctly, it sounds like the fundamental problem here is that the Record-Route URI introduced by the proxy in handling the initial INVITE request has to be conserved in all subsequent requests and replies. It is a requirement to use the same route set in sequential (in-dialog) requests such as reinvites or BYEs. It is also mandatory for the UAS to copy the received Record-Route into the final reply (i.e. 200 OK). The problem is that you then have to choose the network address in the Record-Route. If either the UAC or the UAS cannot directly reach it, your problem arises. Is this an accurate statement of the problem? I wanted to verify before continuing. -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 260 Peachtree Street NW Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/

1 0

SIP Analysis & Testing tools
by Vladimir Broz 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Hi, for sake of Vaclav's courage, let me introduce the "SIP Analysis & Testing tools". This is a set of very powerful utilities that may help you to do SIP call flows analysis. It can do SIP dialogs and transactions matching and analysis in large pcaps, create pretty call flow diagrams, check and verify SIP message content (headers, parameters,..) and many more.... It's available on: https://github.com/vkubart/sipat For more details, please ask Vaclav Kubart (vaclav.kubart(a)iptel.org). SIP Analysis & Testing tools ============================ This project offers set of tools for testing SIP. Dependencies (ubuntu packages) ============ libosip2-dev libpcap-dev libxml2-dev xsltproc cfanal ====== Call flow analyzer able to draw call flows from PCAP and verify callflows against given definition. Usage: cfanal -r captured-traffic.pcap -a 10.38.14.73=uac -a 10.38.14.74:5062=uas -print-cf drawing.cf cf2svg drawing.cf drawing.svg svg2png drawing.svg drawing.png callflow_diagrams ================= XSL template for painting call flow diagrams. ..... Thank you Vaclav a lot! -Vlada

4 4

question
by Allen D. Ford 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Where are the instructions for this gui Im trying to setup a sip load balancer and rtp proxy for nating "Success is not measured by the positions you reach in life but by the obstacles you overcome -B.T.W" [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: cyford]<http://www.cyfordtechnologies.com/>Director Of Technology Allen D. Ford 4290-106 Bells Ferry Road, Suite 20 , Kennesaw , GA 30144 Tel: 404-424-8270: Fax: 404-424-8271 Email: allen(a)cyfordtechnologies.com<mailto:allen@cyfordtechnologies.com> Web Address: http://www.cyfordtechnologies.com <http://www.cyfordtechnologies.com/> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cyford FaceBook: http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002260975450 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies of the original message and notify the sender so that our address record can be corrected. Thank you

2 1

10 Years SER - Awards
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Hello, a surprise part of 10 Years SER Conference was granting *special* awards to the people attending the event that had a major contribution in the management and development of SER/Kamailio to date. Most of them are well known in the community, but not all of them. Hope you like them, it proved to be a very entertaining moment. Here is the pdf with the awards: * http://asipto.com/u/48 The plan is to extend it with the other people in our community as ideas with award titles pop up. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

1 0

10 Years SER - Follow UP
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Hello, first I want to thank to all participants at 10 Years SER event in Berlin last Friday. We spent great time, at least I did! We accepted 50 visiting participants to match the maximum capacity of the conference room, being full booked about 2 weeks before. Just few people didn't show up and didn't inform us at all in advance, which was a pity over all since several persons that registered later were not accepted, thus some of them could have attended. Folks at Fokus working with SER/Kamailio joined us and we had probably one of the very few occasions so far to get so dense knowledge of SIP/VoIP in the same place, making a day of interesting presentations and open discussions. Accompanied by nice weather in Berlin, the evening at Playa Paradiso on river Spree offered a great place for continuing the technical and mufti-cultural debates (I could count attendees from about 15 countries (including Brazil!)). Many thanks again to our sponsors for free drinks and food at this event: Sipgate (http://www.sipgate.de), Amooma (http://www.amooma.de), NG-Voice (http://www.ng-voice.com), Asipto (http://www.asipto.com), Frafos (http://www.frafos.com) and Fokus Institute (http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de). I will upload the presentations soon and send an update here -- there were 15 talks, covering from technical concepts to business matters and open source philosophy. Therefore if you were a speaker and see this message, please send the pdf slides to me. Do not forget, you can join the next party for this celebration this week in Vienna, details at: * http://sip-router.org/10-years-ser-vienna/ Meanwhile, be sure you start/continue testing the upcoming release v3.2.0, we have to be sure it is stable to release it and start a new development cycle in the near future, to be able to present new features at the 11th celebration :-) . Here is a step by step guide to pull the code from GIT and install: * http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:kamailio-devel-from-git Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

2 1

tls + tcp problems
by MÉSZÁROS Mihály 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Hi, I am experiencing two problem: First: I am experiencing that tls read buffer overflow, if i use default value of tcp_rd_buf_size If i doubled the size of read buffer and i use tcp_rd_buf_size=8192 then the problem seems to be solved. Second: I am experiencing that TLS connection is dropped by sip proxy very frequently! And i think the tcp connection shouldn't dropped! So my guess is that TLS communication is not restarting the timeout counters! So in every 2 minutes the sip-router is restarting the TCP connection with tcp RST. like this: Sep 5 11:28:48 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[8129]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4304]: tcp_main: entering timer for 0xac537c74 (ticks=446299809, ti meout=446299809 (0 s), wr_timeout=0 (240541717 s)), write queue: 0 bytes Sep 5 11:28:48 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[8129]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4346]: tcp_main: timeout for 0xac537c74 Sep 5 11:28:48 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[8129]: DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:617]: DBG: io_watch_del (0x824cf80, 48, -1, 0x10) fd_no=41 called Sep 5 11:28:48 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[8129]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:597]: Closing SSL connection 0xac4a0374 Sep 5 11:28:48 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[8129]: DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:247]: tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 10.10.10.10 Sep 5 11:28:48 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[8129]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1081]: tcpconn_new: on port 36142, type 3 Sep 5 11:28:48 hal /usr/sbin/kamailio[8129]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add: hashes: 2473:3781:3367, 5 This second problem is not solved and very urgent for me. Any help suggestion is highly appreciated! Thanks, Misi

2 1

Carrier module for kamailio
by Mino Haluz 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Hi, I need a module which could allow me to send traffic to various carriers and it has to support some important features. So some basic ones: - possibility to re-route the call in case the original route fails - peak/offpeak conditions (time-based) - route traffic according to prefix I found LCR and carrierroute module, but it does not have peak/offpeak feature. Correct me if I am wrong..

2 1

new developer: Sven Knoblich
by Henning Westerholt 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Hi all, I'm happy to announce a new developer for the sip-router project: Sven Knoblich. Sven is an experienced C/C++ developer in our offices in Karlsruhe and since about a year part of the team that develops our VoIP backend services. Past contributions of him were the CDR based accounting extensions in the acc module and several other bugfixes and extensions for the dialog module. He'll maintain in the future this new acc and dialog functionality and also other code contributed from us. Best regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - Head of IT Operations Internet Access & Communications 1&1 Internet AG, Brauerstraße 48, 76135 Karlsruhe, Germany

3 2

Pass all rtp to RTPProxy
by Stas Bakulin 05 Sep '11

05 Sep '11

Hello! What is it right way to pass all rtp traffic through RTPProxy? How this can be configured in Kamailio? Stas Bakulin ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ogion(a)kvant-telecom.ru | www.kvant-telecom.ru Tel: +7 473 233 0330 (128)

2 1

Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways - some via Firewall/NAT
by Sarat C. Vemuri 03 Sep '11

03 Sep '11

We are trying to configure Kamailio (3.1.x) as a "boarder proxy" where it acts as the front for various carrier gateways so that internal UACs and UASs are unaware of the carrier gateways. Let me try to present a clear picture of our setup. 1. Kamailio has several NICs (physical or vlan). Each on a different subnet. One subnet is internal/has routes for internal. Other subnets are private connections to carriers or a route to public Internet. 2. All of these subnets are non-routable from Internet. In addition , the carrier private connections are not routable internally. 3. Connection to public internet is via a FW/NAT (one-to-one NAT), which maps to one of the interfaces. 4. All internal UAC/UAS connect on the internal subnet. 5. We are using RTPProxy (at least one instance per carrier) to relay media between internal and carrier subnets We are able to make this setup up work great except for one scenario. One of the carriers is only reachable via public Internet. Due to security requirements, our Kamailio cannot have a public IP address and must use FW/NAT. I guess this scenario is "Proxy behind NAT" and not really encouraged. But I would like to see if there is a way to make this work. We cannot use the "advertised_address" since it changes the IP for every "route". We were able to get this mostly working by doing the following 1. mhomed=1 2. Small patch in the rtpproxy module so that force_rtp_proxy actually uses the IP address passed (public IP). 3. Using request_route_preset("publicIP") The above "mostly" works. By that I mean, the INVITE transaction is properly passed between internal UAS and carrier SBC and the call is setup. However, further transactions (BYE/re-INVITE) etc do not work properly. So, far-end hangups are not working etc. I've searched various archives of this and other SER lists looking to see if anyone was able to get this scenario working, but couldn't find a definitive answer. Most of them point to using "advertised_address". So, and ideas on how to make "Proxy behind NAT" work without using advertised_address? Am I wasting my time? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. SV.

3 2

10 years of SER - statistics
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

Hello, it is now one month till the 10 years SER event in Berlin. I am thinking to collect few statistics about usage of SER-based code at this moment (SER, OpenSER, Kamailio, OpenIMSCore ...) and present them during the conference and publish on the web. Everything is going to be like a combined report, not individual listing. Therefore, if you want to participate, your name or company won't be mentioned. Here are the stats I thought of: - type of usage: production, evaluation (testing), research - number of subscribers (phone lines) - percentage of phones behind NAT - number of calls per month - number of call minutes per month I am not looking for exact numbers, but rough estimation (e.g., about 10 000 phone lines, ...). Of course, some of the metrics don't apply always (e.g., if you do termination routed through SIP server, you don't have subscribers, but just calls traffic). Those doing deployments, can make one summary of statistics for all instances. You may send other statistics you think they worth publishing. Again, this is voluntary, naming is not required. I hope only those giving real number will write back -- I will try anyhow to figure out if someone is just dumping fantasy numbers. If privacy is really a big concern, from case to case, everything can be done under NDA. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda

2 3

Resend INVITE in case of failure
by Mino Haluz 31 Aug '11

31 Aug '11

Hi, I would like to resend the INVITE to another gateway if the original fails (503, 500, etc.). Is there any module or mechanism which could do this ? Mino

4 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users