- sr-users - kamailio.org

Calls from Kamailio to Teams
by sip user 06 May '20

06 May '20

Hi, I have connected Kamailio like SBC with Teams, and Calls from Teams to Kamailio works.. Now, I have problems with calls from Kamailio to Teams, not works. How have I send the call? I set record_route_preset, but how send the call to Teams? Thanks so much

2 4

Releasing Kamailio v5.3.4
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 06 May '20

06 May '20

Hello, based on the discussions from yesterday's online devel meeting, I am planning to release next week (likely on Wednesday, May 6) the next minor version out of branch 5.3, respectively 5.3.4. Should anyone be aware of issues not reported to the bug tracker or commits for fixes in master not backported to 5.3 branch, let us know. For new issues, the best is to report them on the tracker. For commits, you can provide links/hashids or make pull requests. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 1

Map Diversion to History-Info
by Duarte Rocha 05 May '20

05 May '20

Greetings, Does Kamailio have any method to transform an History-Info with redirecting info into a Diversion or the other way around? Best Regards

2 1

PUA and db_redis
by Carsten Bock 05 May '20

05 May '20

Hi, has anyone been using db_redis with the Presence/PUA modules? If yes, can you share your experience and the proper key definition? Thanks, Carsten -- Carsten Bock I CTO & Founder ng-voice GmbH Trostbrücke 1 I 20457 Hamburg I Germany T +49 40 524 75 93-40 | M +49 179 2021244 I www.ng-voice.com Registry Office at Local Court Hamburg, HRB 120189 Managing Directors: Dr. David Bachmann, Carsten Bock

1 0

Roadmap to the next major release - Kamailio v5.4.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 May '20

05 May '20

Hello, I am going to send a few emails on different topics to inform the broader community on mailing lists about what was discussed during the last online development meeting that happened last Wednesday, so everyone becomes aware and add own opinions and suggestions. First here is about the next major release, which is considered for the mid of summer. To allow the usual 1-1.5 months of testing time frame, the development has to be frozen in the first part of June (more or less one month from now on). If there will be no other proposals in the near future that end up in postponing the release target date, then try to push to master branch (or do pull requests) any new features that you want in Kamailio 5.4.x in the next 4-5 weeks. Once the code is frozen, you would have to wait for another release cycle to get new features in a stable branch. During the online meeting there was no major missing feature reported, if anyone here knows any, describe it and maybe some developer has time to implement it. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

info: in-memory presentity records
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 May '20

05 May '20

Hello, the presentity records (PUBLISH data) stored by the presence module needed always an external storage backend (sql/no-sql database), for subscriptions (active watchers) it was possible to use memory caching only. I recently added support for cache-only module for PUBLISH data as well, more details are presented in the news article: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2020/05/in-memory-presentity-records/ That could help simplifying network architecture on distributed platforms leveraging cloud infrastructure and using replications mechanisms (e.g., dmq, evapi+pua_json, nsq, ...) between the Kamailio nodes. The impact on the code was quite significant, given that any PUBLISH triggers a series of internal tasks (apply xcap rules, update watchers, ...), therefore I am calling for community testing to be sure old operational modes were not affected as well as testing the new mode to discover eventual issues -- just open an item on bug tracker when a problem is discovered. Special credits to Fred Posner (lod.com) for supporting the development of this feature and to Emmanuel Schmidbauer for testing and troubleshooting in the early phase of development. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

rtpproxy and NAT
by Pavithra M 05 May '20

05 May '20

Hi, kamailio version - 5.3.3 I have configured rtpproxy in pcscf . rtpproxy 17002 1 0 18:40 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/rtpproxy -s udp:10.40.10.3 7722 -u rtpproxy rtpproxy -p /var/run/rtpproxy/rtpproxy.pid -l 10.45.4.22 -d DBUG LOG_LOCAL0 I have configured rtpproxy in kamailio.cfg as well. modparam("rtpproxy", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:10.40.10.3:7722") 10.40.10.3 - private IP 10.45.4.22 - public IP I have enabled NAT configuration also. When i make a call from zoiper client , rtp packets are going to some other public ip Could anyone please help me in this issue. Kindly help.

1 3

load_crl takes 90 seconds to complete it execution with crl file size of 4MB !!!
by mahesh b 03 May '20

03 May '20

Hi All, Am using Kamailio 5.1.9 version, In my tls.cfg i have one client and server profile, along with default client and server profile. I have crl enabled for the non default client and server profile , the crl file size is 4 MB in my case. I have 22 child tcp process. With this what i observe is load_crl is taking close to 90 seconds to finish its execution and return. It is very clear from the code, its because of this for loop. procs_no=get_max_procs(); for(i = 0; i < procs_no; i++) { if (SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations(d->ctx[i], d->crl_file.s, 0) != 1) { ERR("%s: Unable to load certificate revocation list '%s'\n", tls_domain_str(d), d->crl_file.s); TLS_ERR("load_crl:"); return -1; } store = SSL_CTX_get_cert_store(d->ctx[i]); X509_STORE_set_flags(store, X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK | X509_V_FLAG_CRL_CHECK_ALL); } Is there a way this can be enhanced or as per the current kamailio design this is a must to do for each and every profile and the child process array list. Please suggest, is it justifiable for load_crl to take 90 seconds , to complete its execution, with one client and server profile and 22 child tcp process and crl file size of 4MB. More info of my setup: ----------------------------- Kamailio 5.1.9 version is running on the below Linux Kernel version : 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 Centos version : CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) CPU : 2 cores with model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz [root@miv5000 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 3882076 kB MemFree: 811244 kB MemAvailable: 2320356 kB Openssl verison : OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 Regards, Mahesh.B

2 2

Build-variable name for route[name]
by Karsten Horsmann 02 May '20

02 May '20

Hi List, my google skills dont help me. I know there is a kind of build-in variable that you can use for example to return the name of the route you are referring to right now. here some pseudo kamailio-scripting-language: route[FANCY_ROUTE] { xlog("L_INFO", "$??? something happened\n"; } I search for $??? (as placeholder) which should return the route-name "route[FANCY_ROUTE]" or something like that? Take care. -- Cheers *Karsten Horsmann*

3 7

WebRTC control plane: how do you handle trickle ICE?
by Anthony Alba 01 May '20

01 May '20

Hello, For those of you integrating with WebRTC and using a websocket control plane like SIP.js how do you handle trickle ICE? If you use trickle ICE any recommended RTP media servers (FreeSWITCH, Kurento, ....)? SIP.js does some trick like delay XXX ms before sending out the offer assuming the browser has collected all the ICE candidates, or maybe even wait for the IceGatheringDone event: what do you think of such a pattern? I see that rtpengine source code mentions "trickle" in a few places, but the rtpengine module doesn't make it clear how to send a ICE candidate for an existing call. Cheers Anthony Alba

3 2

Kamailio & rtpproxy with more than one external IP interfaces
by Leonid Fainshtein 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

Hi, My server has several external IP interfaces and one internal interface. For some calls I would like to handle RTP via Ext1<->Int interfaces and for other calls: via Ext2<->Int. In order to achieve this, I don't define the '-l' rtpproxy parameter, and depending on the call, I set the required IP address as a parameter of rtpproxy_manage(). I didn't succeed to get the desired result. On my testbed, I have the following interfaces: Ext1: 192.168.0.31 Ext2: 192.168.0.32 Int: 10.159.65.1 When I try to create Ext2<->Int (192.168.0.32<-> 10.159.65.1), the packets that accepted on the internal interface are sent out from the Ext1(192.168.0.31) instead of Ext2 (192.168.0.32). It looks like the decision about the source address is made based on the IP routing table information (?). Also, I would like to have an advertised address for at least one external interface. Is it achievable with just one instance of rtpproxy? Or, it is necessary to run two rtpproxies in the bridged mode wit configured advertize addresses? Thank you in advance, Leonid

3 7

Call from Asterisk - kamailio - Teams
by sip user 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

Hi... I have integrated Asterisk with Teams using Kamailio like SBC, thanks this list.. I can make call from Teams to Asterisk throught Kamailio, I have not Callerid from Teams but I'm working in this.. The problem that I have is call from Asterisk to Teams.. So, I have configurated a PSTN in Kamailio to my Asterisk. In Kamailio.cfg I have: * PSTN GW Routing * * - pstn.gw_ip: valid IP or hostname as string value, example: * pstn.gw_ip = "10.0.0.101" desc "My PSTN GW Address" * * - by default is empty to avoid misrouting */ pstn.gw_ip = "IP ASERISK" desc "PSTN GW Address" pstn.gw_port = "PORT ASTERISK" desc "PSTN GW Port" In request_route, when I received an INVITE, I have: if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) { if(src_ip==IP ASTERISK) { record_route_preset("centralita.arcanos.es:5061 ;transport=$ add_rr_param(";r2=on"); } else { route(PSTN); } } So, If I received an INVITE from a src_ip!=IP ASTERISK, I route to PSTN and call to my Asterisk(works, without callerid, but works). I don't know if there are any best way to do that.. If I received an INVITE from a src_ip==IP ASTERISK, I set record_route_preset, but how can I send the call to Teams? What is wrong? What are I doing wrong? Thanks

1 0

Time taken for tls_fix_domains_cfg initialization to complete is 8 seconds
by mahesh b 30 Apr '20

30 Apr '20

Hi All, I have 10 client profiles and 10 server profiles along with default client and server profile in my tls.cfg These are the numbers on time taken for tls_fix_domains_cfg initialization to complete based on the number of client and server profiles i have. Number of profiles Time diff (Sec) No of tcp child processes Start time End time 5 *3.99* 42 16:47:01.836 16:47:05.826 6 4.69 42 16:59:29.335 16:59:34.027 7 *5.347* 42 17:04:30.271 17:04:35.618 8 *6.10* 42 17:18:41.109 17:18:47.204 9 *6.614* 42 17:22:36.869 17:22:43.483 10 *7.379* 42 17:27:46.676 17:27:54.055 Kamailio 5.1.9 version is running on the below Linux Kernel version : 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 Centos version : CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core) CPU : 2 cores with model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700 CPU @ 3.40GHz [root@miv5000 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo MemTotal: 3882076 kB MemFree: 811244 kB MemAvailable: 2320356 kB Openssl verison : OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 Now my question is : Is it ok for the api to take "8 seconds" to complete initialization in case of having 10 client and 10 server profiles along with default profiles in tls.cfg ? The time units taken for initialization to complete should it be in the order of milliseconds range or in seconds range ? Are there any more parameters related to tls configuration like "crl " which would play a factor in time taken for the initialization to complete. Currently at my application level , timeout is happening as the initialization is taking more time when more number of profiles are enabled. Please share your inputs on whether it is justifiable with my setup cpu/memory, it is ok for tls_fix_domains_cfg to take 8 seconds for the initialization to complete. Regards, Mahesh.B.

1 0

Next online devel meeting - Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 14:00UTC
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 29 Apr '20

29 Apr '20

Hello, in order to plan the roadmap to next major release, it is time to organize another online devel meeting, so the developers and community members can syncronize and plan what should be done till Kamailio v5.4 will be out. Because freenode.net service is now requiring user registration to join IRC channels on their servers, we are considering some alternatives that would allow guest participation, one of them being using a matrix chat room. More details about it will be posted soon. I created a wiki page for the event at: * https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/devel/irc-meetings/2020a Feel free to add there topics that you want to be discussed. The proposed date is next Wednesday, April 29, 2020, at 14:00UTC (15:00 London/Dublin, 16:00 most of West Europe, 10:00 New York), but other dates can be proposed if they suit for more participants. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

4 7

NAT and RTP
by Pavithra M 29 Apr '20

29 Apr '20

Hi, I have installed kamailio as a ims server in openstack and enabled WITH_NAT and rtpproxy . I have installed pcscf, icscf, scscf and hss in four different ubuntu instances . server - kamailio 5.3.3. When i make a call using zoiper client from external network , call is becoming a missed call without giving ACK and BYE. Openstack - pcscf - 10.40.10.3 (floating ip - 10.45.4.22) icscf - 10.40.10.12 scscf - 10.40.10.5 hss - 10.40.10.31 zoiper1 - 10.0.2.15 zoiper2 - 10.0.2.15 kindly help me in this regard. when i installed without using NAT and rtpproxy, the call went well. Since currently i am using Opensatck , it is my prerequisite to use zoiper client externally .so for me it is mandate to enable NAT and rtpproxy. Help me please!!!

1 0

change module parameter in routing logic
by Ali Taher 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

Hi, Is it possible to change a module parameter inside the routing logic ? For example I want to change sqlcon parameter of sqlops module based on the originating IP. Regards,

2 5

DNS SRV issue
by Melek Oktay 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

Hi All, I have a user, who has a SRV records like below, srv:betaproxy.siptelekom.com 1- SRV betaproxy siptelekom 4 hrs 20 0 5060 beta-proxy-dc01.siptelekom.com (X.Y.87.150) 2- SRV betaproxy siptelekom 4 hrs 10 0 5060 beta-proxy-dc02.siptelekom.com (X.Y.87.160) And I want to send the call to him/her, but one of the potential IP address could be failed. Assume that, first record (X.Y.87.150) is failed when I'm trying to send the packet. Later on, timeout occurs and our Kamailio try to send the packet to second one (X.Y.87.160) after period ot time. My question: Next time when I want to send another call to the same user, how Kamailio could use second (X.Y.87.160) SRV instead of trying to first one (X.Y.87.150) ? What is the elegant way to implement this ? Best Regards, Melek

1 0

RTP relay
by hugues 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

Hello I'm trying to run Kamailio in front of an asterisk server due to security issues. Both servers have a public ip address. It works fine but the RTP voice traffic goes directly from the VOIP client to the asterisk server without going through the kamailio server. I want to shut down the asterisk server so that it only talks to the kamailio server. UA -> Kamailio public IP addr <-> Asterisk public ip addr How do I force RTP traffic to go through kamailio. Apparently I don't have NAT so I don't need rtpproxy. But you need something that relays RTP traffic? If anyone has an idea I'll take it. Thank you for your help. Hugues. -- Sent from: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Users-f3.html

4 4

DMQ broadcasting crashes kamailio
by SamyGo 28 Apr '20

28 Apr '20

Hi, Is there a way to broadcast KDMQ to the cluster but not expect a reply back !?as far as I've read the source code dmq_bcast_message is exactly like dmq_send_message in a way that it expects a callback to be executed on response i.e expects a reply. So, the situation I'm facing is I'm broadcasting message to cluster and I do not want a reply back. The following two options result in crash & core dump. 1 - If my script doesn't respond back, by use of dmq_handle_message, it marks the destined servers as "inactive" and stops usrloc sync process which isn't desirable. 2 - If I respond back with the dmq_handle_message it crashes the Kamailio which just received this broadcasted message. Here is how its done in script: *broadcasting message to cluster:* dmq_bcast_message("userOnline", "$fu", "text/plain"); *Receiving and handling a broadcast message:* route[DMQ_HANDLE] { if(!(is_method("KDMQ") || $rm == "KDMQ")) return; if(is_method("KDMQ") || $rm == "KDMQ"){ if($rU =~ "userOnline"){ //user came online in cluster, resume transactions if-any suspended $avp(remoteUser) = $rb; } dmq_handle_message(); exit; } } *Related log lines:* Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: ALERT: <script>: [da2c1-2f499] ------ DMQ_HANDLE: UserOnline Event Received ------ Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: dmq [message.c:53]: ki_dmq_handle_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message [KDMQ sip:userOnline@9.8.7.123:5060] Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: dmq [message.c:66]: ki_dmq_handle_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message peer found: userOnline Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[916]: DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:437]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 401461 usec Apr 23 21:15:48 kamailio[935]: DEBUG: dmq [worker.c:87]: worker_loop(): dmq_worker [2 935] lock acquired and crash/segfault.. Core dump: https://pastebin.com/S7ekCPfF Any help or pointers to solve this would be really appreciated. Best Regards, Sammy

5 13

RFC: C standard requirements
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

Hello, (cross-posting because it is relevant to know where users need to run Kamailio as well as what developers tend to use for coding, but replies can go to one or the other list). Somehow I tried to stay close to ANSI-C/C90 with C coding style, for the reason of being compatible as much as possible with old compiles and niche/embedded systems. But I noticed that there are couple of C99 extensions in the core, like inline functions, variadic macros (the debugging macros), use of 'long long' or line comments starting with "//" (not so many, but still such comment style is used). Although I haven't searched for occurrences in core, but I remember seeing designated initializers (or initializing a structure by field names). These are part of C99, as listed by: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C99#Design Although likely GCC had some of them like custom extensions before the standard was out. On the other hand, newer standard C11 made some of those extensions optional: * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C11_(C_standard_revision)#Optional_features So, my email here is to figure out if we should consider C99 as the requirement for adding C code or be more restrictive because there are still cases of usage on very specific systems that do not have such C compiler. We can eventually make a list of what is accepted or not from the recent versions of C standard to stay as much as possible portable across Unix'es. >From develeopers perspective, it would be good to learn if they use (in other projects, etc.) extensions of the new standards that they found useful and simplify their programming work. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

how to use get my domain name in VIA header (INVITE) instead of IP address.
by Nasida Yuriy 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

Hi guys, It sounds simple but I can not get domain name in VIA header (INVITE) instead of IP address. It is just FS ---INVITE --> Kamailio --INVITE--> endpoint Kamailio gets INVITE, and adds one more VIA with it's IP address. How to get domain name instead ? Please advice.

6 12

Multi INVITE issue
by Pavithra M 27 Apr '20

27 Apr '20

Hi, I have configured kamailio IMS in vm based images. I have configured pcscf,icscf,scscf,hss and ue in five different vms.I am able to successfully make a call via IMS. But when making a INVITE from alice to bob, it goes via ue -> pcscf pcscf -> scscf scscf -> icscf icscf -> scscf scscf -> pcscf (here multiple INVITE is happening and giving 483 Too Many Hops error and then the call is going to UE successfully) pcscf -> ue Can anybody help me what am i missing . why multi INVITE is happening there alone and giving me too many hops issue. Even after that issue how the call reaches the other UE. Kindly anyone help me in this regard atleast where to check this scenario.

2 1

Dialog module problem.
by Voip support 24 Apr '20

24 Apr '20

Hello, i am using dialog module in-memory to get all dialogs and show in a website. I use for this kamctl dialog show which is run quite often for autorefresh. I noticed that some calls get hung on kamailio while on caller side and callee side calls are disconnected. I captured a wireshark trace and for same caller IP i get many good calls as well some bad calls (not disconnected properly). When comparing the BYE packets i could not notice any difference. However in the "BAD" calls it looks like the BYE from caller get stuck on kamailio and is not sent/forwarded to callee side. I get BYE retransmissions from caller and all BYE requests got stuck on kamailio. After few seconds Callee side sends BYE and that BYE also get stuck. I am wondering how to trace this issue (differently than taking a wireshark trace) as i dont see any difference in the good BYE and the bad BYE. It looks like for any reason from time to time BYE is not forwarded to the other side and when the other side sents BYE its also not forwarded to call initiator. Please give me a clue how to continue on this. I am using dispatcher module to send the calls. Best regards Tom

2 2

nat_uac_test(8)
by Sergiu Pojoga 24 Apr '20

24 Apr '20

When receiving an INVITE over a specific LTE carrier, I'm seeing 'c=IN IP4 192.0.0.4' in SDP, which isn't technically a RFC1918 or RFC6598 IP address and thus nat_uac_test(8) fails. What elegant workaround can be done to catch such specific cases? Thanks.

5 11

Kamailio like SBC with Teams
by sip user 24 Apr '20

24 Apr '20

Hello good morning ... I am new to this list and I was starting to mess with Kamailio, mainly to set it up as SBC against Teams, in this case. But I can't get it to work for me. If I launch a call from the Teams, in the Kamailio I see: 1.- In syslog: Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 52.114.7.24 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 4160, type 3 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 171:1857:1187, 30 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa1f240, 23, 2, 0x7f90f2438f80), fd_no=17 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0xa1f240, 23, -1, 0x0) fd_no=18 called Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4219]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): tcp: DBG: sending to child, events 1 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3902]: send2child(): selected tcp worker 1 10(23159) for activity on [tls:SBC_IP:5061], 0x7f90f2438f80 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1507]: handle_io(): received n=8 con=0x7f90f2438f80, fd=9 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain TLSs<default> Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: tls [tls_domain.c:700]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake started Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2516]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending... Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2550]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7f90f2438f80 n=1468 fd=9 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2551]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: buf= Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: #026#003#003 Apr 15 11:11:41 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:388]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0x9c1700, 9, 2, 0x7f90f2438f80), fd_no=1 Apr 15 11:11:42 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:296]: tcp_read_data(): EOF on 0x7f90f2438f80, FD 9 Apr 15 11:11:42 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1291]: tcp_read_req(): tcp_read_req: EOF Apr 15 11:11:42 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9c1700, 9, -1, 0x10) fd_no=2 called Apr 15 11:11:42 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1434]: release_tcpconn(): releasing con 0x7f90f2438f80, state -1, fd=9, id=30 Apr 15 11:11:42 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 10(23159) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_read.c:1435]: release_tcpconn(): extra_data 0x7f90f2432b40 Apr 15 11:11:42 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3331]: handle_tcp_child(): handle_tcp_child: reader response= 7f90f2438f80, -1 from 1 Apr 15 11:11:42 vps793907 kamailio[23122]: 13(23167) DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:604]: tls_h_close(): Closing SSL connection 0x7f90f2432b40 2.- With TCPDUMP: 11:13:09.311797 IP SBC_IP .1024 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [S], seq 261244614, win 64240, options [mss 1440,nop,wscale 8,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 11:13:09.311898 IP SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls > 52.114.76.76.1024: Flags [S.], seq 812357247, ack 261244615, win 29200, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 11:13:09.340358 IP 52.114.76.76.1024 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [.], ack 1, win 2053, length 0 11:13:09.340560 IP 52.114.76.76.1024 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [P.], seq 1:187, ack 1, win 2053, length 186 11:13:09.340578 IP SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls > 52.114.76.76.1024: Flags [.], ack 187, win 237, length 0 11:13:09.341361 IP SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls > 52.114.76.76.1024: Flags [P.], seq 1:1469, ack 187, win 237, length 1468 11:13:09.369606 IP 52.114.76.76.1024 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [.], ack 1469, win 2053, length 0 11:13:12.451498 IP 52.114.7.24.1216 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [S], seq 309084204, win 64240, options [mss 1440,nop,wscale 8,nop,nop,sackOK], length 0 11:13:12.451587 IP SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls > 52.114.7.24.1216: Flags [S.], seq 3275066862, ack 309084205, win 29200, options [mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7], length 0 11:13:12.707119 IP 52.114.7.24.1216 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [.], ack 1, win 2053, length 0 11:13:12.707311 IP 52.114.7.24.1216 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [P.], seq 1:187, ack 1, win 2053, length 186 11:13:12.707345 IP SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls > 52.114.7.24.1216: Flags [.], ack 187, win 237, length 0 11:13:12.708273 IP SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls > 52.114.7.24.1216: Flags [P.], seq 1:1469, ack 187, win 237, length 1468 11:13:12.965101 IP 52.114.7.24.1216 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [.], ack 1469, win 2053, length 0 11:13:12.965156 IP 52.114.7.24.1216 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [F.], seq 187, ack 1469, win 2053, length 0 11:13:12.965688 IP SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls > 52.114.7.24.1216: Flags [F.], seq 1469, ack 188, win 237, length 0 11:13:13.220871 IP 52.114.7.24.1216 > SBC_IP .eu.sip-tls: Flags [.], ack 1470, win 2053, length 0 I can't "receive" anything. I have generated the certificates and configured in the tls.cfg of the Kamailio: [server:default] method = TLSv1.2 verify_certificate = no require_certificate = no private_key = /etc/letsencrypt/ssl/cert.key certificate = /etc/letsencrypt/ssl/cert.crt ca_list = /etc/letsencrypt/ssl/ca.crt Within Kamailio itself I have it configured to return a 200 KeepAlive to Teams when it receives an OPTIONS: event_route[tm:local-request] { if(is_method("OPTIONS") && $ru =~ "pstnhub.microsoft.com") { append_hf("Contact: <sip: SBC_DNS :5061;transport=tls>\r\n"); } xlog("L_INFO", "Sent out tm request: $mb\n"); } And I have measured the record_route for this new one: record_route_preset(" SBC_DNS :5061;transport=tls", " SBC_IP :5061"); I have created a dispatcher.list: # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer, optional), priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional) 1:1:sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls 0 3 socket=tls: SBC_IP :5061;ping_from= sip:SBC_DNS 2:1:sip:sip2.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls 0 2 socket=tls: SBC_IP :5061;ping_from=sip: SBC_DNS 3:1:sip:sip3.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls 0 1 socket=tls: SBC_IP :5061;ping_from=sip: SBC_DNS 4:1:sip:sip-all.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls 0 1 socket=tls: SBC_IP :5061;ping_from=sip: SBC_DNS I think that one of the problems is that I do not send the OPTIONS to the Teams well, since it is on their panel, it indicates that the SBC is INACTIVE. I don't know if you could help me straighten this out a bit ... Thank you so much for everything.. a greeting

5 15

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users