- sr-users - kamailio.org

[Serusers] stun client/server
by jh＠lohi.eng.song.fi 18 Mar '03

18 Mar '03

we got from somewhere Alan Hawrylyshen's stun client/server implementation version 0.8.2, but doesn't appear to implement the latest stun draft draft-ietf-midcom-stun-05.txt, but some earlier version. does anyone know if there exists an open source stun client/server that would conform to the latest stun draft? -- juha

3 4

[Serusers] Elena_M sent you a Yahoo! Greeting
by replymsg＠greetings.yahoo.com 17 Mar '03

17 Mar '03

1 0

[Serusers] bug in tm module - 503 Service Unavailable
by Tirpák Miklós 17 Mar '03

17 Mar '03

Hi, I think there is a bug in the tm module of he CVS tree: timer.c line 283: if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )<=0) { SEND_BUFFER returns -1 on error, and 0 on success, so it should be if (SEND_BUFFER( r_buf )==-1) { SER always sends "503 Service Unavailable" respond after sending INVITE retransmissions in our test environment. Modifying timer.c solved this problem. I can attach my syslog or udp-log if necessary. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miklos Tirpak Computer and Automation Research Institute e-mail : mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences phone : (361) 279-6011 H-1132. Budapest, Victor Hugo u 18-22 fax : (361) 279-6021

3 5

[Serusers] (no subject)
by Christoph 17 Mar '03

17 Mar '03

Hello! I am interested in the presence support that ser offers. Are there any documents for this topic or something else available? My interest in that topic grounds in the needs of information for the diploma thesis I am currently writing. Best Regards Christoph -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!

3 2

[Serusers] �� 30�.�. �� 15�.�.��
by constellation＠tconl.com 17 Mar '03

17 Mar '03

1 0

[Serusers] Registration - 401 Unauthorized
by Anton Yurchenko 17 Mar '03

17 Mar '03

Hello, I`ve downloaded todays cvs and installed is, now, I am trying to register my SIP phone ( Snom 100 ), with it and authorize it. The phone sends a REGISTER and the ser sends it a 401 Unauthorized. ----------- 0.000000 172.20.0.199 -> 172.20.0.50 SIP Request: SUBSCRIBE sip:phila@phila.dg 0.002626 172.20.0.50 -> 172.20.0.199 SIP Status: 404 Not Found 0.038876 172.20.0.199 -> 172.20.0.50 SIP Request: REGISTER sip:phila.dg 0.042129 172.20.0.50 -> 172.20.0.199 SIP Status: 401 Unauthorized ------------- I`ve added the user to the mysql database and, am using the configuration included in the example ser.cfg ( I`ve uncommented the 4 lines). --------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("dg", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("dg", "0"); break; }; --------------------------- it seems that the www_challenge sends this message. How to fix this? And what is the SUBSCRIBE request? Thanks a lot, -- Anton Yurchenko<phila(a)dg.net.ua> Digital Generation

3 6

[Serusers] �� Trium Eclipse �� 129$
by constellation＠tconl.com 17 Mar '03

17 Mar '03

1 0

[Serusers] Asterisk as PSTN gateway
by Michael Haberler 16 Mar '03

16 Mar '03

did anybody try to use Asterisk (www.asterisk.org) as an PSTN gateway? Any experiences, <good or bad? -Michael

1 0

[Serusers] jabber? microsoft messenger
by lgfausak＠august.net 16 Mar '03

16 Mar '03

I've been testing a bunch of soft clients out and Microsoft Messenger seems to work very well. It has the notion of contacts that are online. I guess this is what the Jabber modules is for, right? Right now, for me to start a phone call with Messenger it is weird, I have to: 1) click on 'Start a Voice Conversation' 2) click on the 'Other' tab when the new window pops up. 3) Enter a long email address '4695461235(a)augustvoice.net' in the prompted box. ... Then my phone call starts. It would be much better if I could just pick from my list of contacts. Is the jabber configuration and deployment pretty easy? Does it play well with non-jabber clients? By the way, we have about 20 beta users registering with SER routing calls to and from the PSTN. It is working very well. ---greg Greg Fausak

2 1

[Serusers] Cisco 2600 SIP dial peers
by Emil 16 Mar '03

16 Mar '03

Hi all, Just a question before I embark on my next SER venture. I now have a couple of Cisco 7960 phones sitting behind fw's and using transverse NAT and SER auth (The Auth working thanks to JAN) @ different homes. All these homes are connected to the internet via ADSL and use DDNS, my SER server sits on the Internet and have a fixed IP and DNS entry. This config works really well. The next step is to add a Cisco 2600 router to the config and hook 4 FXO ports up to our PABX @ work. I only want authenticated users on SER to be able to forward requests to the router, I can tell the router only to accept connections that originated on the SER server. Is this possible on SER. Kind regards, Emil

2 2

Re: [Serusers] SER log
by Bo 16 Mar '03

16 Mar '03

OOh, you are absolutely right. I forgot to put the quote marks on the domain name! Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: Emil To: Bo Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 10:15 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Bo, Try this uri=~"xxx.com" or usr=~"xxx\.com Let me know. s E ----- Original Message ----- From: Bo To: Emil Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Emil, I re-installed the ser-0.8.10-2.i386.rpm on Redhat 8.0. This time with the default /usr/local/etc/ser.cfg, SER could start without any problem. But when I just changed 'if (uri==mydomain)' to 'if(uri==xxx.com)', it showed 'ERROR: bad config file (11 errors)'. Is there anything wrong? Thanks Bo ----- Original Message ----- From: Emil To: Bo Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 1:32 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Bo, Am running it on RedHat 8.0 and installed it from the rpm, no problem. E ----- Original Message ----- From: Bo To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 1:44 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Thanks Emil. Yes, after I comment the PSTN gateway part, it worked. Lots of error messages came out during the bootup of the server. I doubt there must be something wrong with the re-compilation. I tried the precomiled version (rpm package) on Redhat linux 8.0 first. But the server couldn't bootup (it showed 'Terminated' when booting). Has anyone ever compiled SER on Redhat 8.0? Regards Bo ----- Original Message ----- From: Emil To: Bo Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Bo, Just change the if uri== back to myself for testing. Have you tried the precompiled version? When I start the service (service ser start) on no fork and debug 9 the service should look like it is hanging, oops and change log_stderror=no to yes. Tail /var/log/message again and let me know. E ----- Original Message ----- From: Bo To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 1:14 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Emil, Thanks for your infor. I tried and it still didn't work. Now I doubt if the /etc/ser/ser.cfg (see the following) takes effect or not. I changed the settings and if I ran the server by command ' # ser ', no problem. But if I ran it like ' # ser -f ser.cfg ', then it told me ERROR: bad config file (11 errors) Actually I didn't change too much on the default ser.cfg. Pls indicate. _________________________________________________________________________________ # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.12 2002/10/21 02:40:06 jiri Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=9 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth", "secret", "alsdkhglaksdhfkloiwr") #modparam("auth", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth", "password_column", "password") # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwars==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (len_gt( max_len )) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # Do strict routing if pre-loaded route headers present rewriteFromRoute(); # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==sip.mycompany.com) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication # if (!www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) { # www_challenge("iptel.org", "0"); # break; # }; save("location"); break; }; # attempt handoff to PSTN if (uri=~"^sip:[0-9]*@sip.mycompany.com") { log(4, "Forwarding to PSTN\n"); forward(X.X.X.X,5060); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } _____________________________________________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: Emil To: Bo Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:43 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Bo, Jan just helped me with a similar problem. Debug level = 9 and fork t= no. Tail /var/log messages and you will get plenty of info. Emil ----- Original Message ----- From: Bo To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:35 AM Subject: [Serusers] SER log Hi, Does anyone have any clue on the following problem? I recompiled and installed SER in Redhat Linux 8.0. Unfortunately I tried all the possible options (debug level) in the ser.cfg, but the only messages I could see in the /var/log/messsages are as follows. Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: INFO: fifo process starting: 15316 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... What should I do to see the detailed debugs? Thanks, Bo

2 1

Re: Re: [Serusers] SER log
by Bo 16 Mar '03

16 Mar '03

Hi Mathi, Thanks for your suggestion. I re-installed the ser-0.8.10-2.i386.rpm on Redhat 8.0. This time with the default /usr/local/etc/ser/ser.cfg (lib is under /usr/local/lib/ser/modules), SER could start without any problem. But when I just changed 'if (uri==mydomain)' to 'if(uri==xxx.com)', it showed 'ERROR: bad config file (11 errors)'. Is there anything wrong? Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: "sipdev" <sipdev(a)xten.com> To: "Bo" <boman122(a)yahoo.com> Cc: "mark(a)xten.com" <erik(a)xten.com> Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 10:55 AM Subject: RE: Re: [Serusers] SER log > Hi Bo, > we compiled the SER(8.10 linuxi386 ) in redhat linux 8.0. > we placed the ser folder in desktop and tried to run that. > It gave errors when i.e unable to find ser.cfg.Then we copied the ser.cfg and the lib folder to the home directory i.e > /usr/local.... > > Now ser is working fine. > please try this. > > Regards, > Mathi > > > > Original Message ----------------------- > Thanks Emil. > > Yes, after I comment the PSTN gateway part, it worked. Lots of error messages came out during the bootup of the server. I doubt there must be something wrong with the re-compilation. > > I tried the precomiled version (rpm package) on Redhat linux 8.0 first. But the server couldn't bootup (it showed 'Terminated' when booting). Has anyone ever compiled SER on Redhat 8.0? > > Regards > Bo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Emil > To: Bo > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 6:23 PM > Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log > > > Hi Bo, > > Just change the if uri== back to myself for testing. > > Have you tried the precompiled version? > > When I start the service (service ser start) on no fork and debug 9 the service should look like it is hanging, oops and change log_stderror=no to yes. > > Tail /var/log/message again and let me know. > > E > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bo > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 1:14 AM > Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log > > > Hi Emil, > > Thanks for your infor. > > I tried and it still didn't work. Now I doubt if the /etc/ser/ser.cfg (see the following) takes effect or not. I changed the settings and if I ran the server by command ' # ser ', no problem. But if I ran it like ' # ser -f ser.cfg ', then it told me > ERROR: bad config file (11 errors) > Actually I didn't change too much on the default ser.cfg. > > Pls indicate. > ____________________________________________________________________________ _____ > # > # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.12 2002/10/21 02:40:06 jiri Exp $ > # > # simple quick-start config script > # > > # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ > > debug=9 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) > fork=no > log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) > check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) > dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) > rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) > port=5060 > children=4 > fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" > > # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- > > # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database > #loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" > > loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" > loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" > loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" > loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" > loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" > loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" > > # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication > # mysql.so must be loaded ! > #loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" > > # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- > > # -- usrloc params -- > > modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) > > # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database > # for persistent storage and comment the previous line > #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) > > # -- auth params -- > # Uncomment if you are using auth module > # > #modparam("auth", "secret", "alsdkhglaksdhfkloiwr") > #modparam("auth", "calculate_ha1", yes) > # > # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), > # uncomment also the following parameter) > # > #modparam("auth", "password_column", "password") > > # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- > > # main routing logic > > route{ > > # initial sanity checks -- messages with > # max_forwars==0, or excessively long requests > if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { > sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); > break; > }; > if (len_gt( max_len )) { > sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); > break; > }; > > # Do strict routing if pre-loaded route headers present > rewriteFromRoute(); > > # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc > # (in case, it does not work, use the following command > # with proper names and addresses in it) > if (uri==sip.mycompany.com) { > > if (method=="REGISTER") { > > # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication > # if (!www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) { > # www_challenge("iptel.org", "0"); > # break; > # }; > > save("location"); > break; > }; > > # attempt handoff to PSTN > if (uri=~"^sip:[0-9]*@sip.mycompany.com") { > log(4, "Forwarding to PSTN\n"); > forward(X.X.X.X,5060); > break; > }; > > # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB > if (!lookup("location")) { > sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); > break; > }; > }; > # forward to current uri now > if (!t_relay()) { > sl_reply_error(); > }; > > } > ____________________________________________________________________________ _ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Emil > To: Bo > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:43 PM > Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log > > > Hi Bo, > > Jan just helped me with a similar problem. > > Debug level = 9 and fork t= no. > > Tail /var/log messages and you will get plenty of info. > > Emil > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bo > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:35 AM > Subject: [Serusers] SER log > > > Hi, > > Does anyone have any clue on the following problem? > > I recompiled and installed SER in Redhat Linux 8.0. Unfortunately I tried all the possible options (debug level) in the ser.cfg, but the only messages I could see in the /var/log/messsages are as follows. > > Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 > Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 > Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 > Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 > Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 > Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 > Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: INFO: fifo process starting: 15316 > Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... > > What should I do to see the detailed debugs? > > Thanks, > > Bo

2 1

[Serusers] IETF
by Jiri Kuthan 15 Mar '03

15 Mar '03

Friends, I'll be in the upcoming IETF meeting from tommorrow to Friday. If there is any need to talk to me at higher bandwidth, just let me know -- I will do my best to allocate time for you. -Jiri -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

Re: [Serusers] SER log
by Bo 15 Mar '03

15 Mar '03

Thanks Emil. Yes, after I comment the PSTN gateway part, it worked. Lots of error messages came out during the bootup of the server. I doubt there must be something wrong with the re-compilation. I tried the precomiled version (rpm package) on Redhat linux 8.0 first. But the server couldn't bootup (it showed 'Terminated' when booting). Has anyone ever compiled SER on Redhat 8.0? Regards Bo ----- Original Message ----- From: Emil To: Bo Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 6:23 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Bo, Just change the if uri== back to myself for testing. Have you tried the precompiled version? When I start the service (service ser start) on no fork and debug 9 the service should look like it is hanging, oops and change log_stderror=no to yes. Tail /var/log/message again and let me know. E ----- Original Message ----- From: Bo To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 1:14 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Emil, Thanks for your infor. I tried and it still didn't work. Now I doubt if the /etc/ser/ser.cfg (see the following) takes effect or not. I changed the settings and if I ran the server by command ' # ser ', no problem. But if I ran it like ' # ser -f ser.cfg ', then it told me ERROR: bad config file (11 errors) Actually I didn't change too much on the default ser.cfg. Pls indicate. _________________________________________________________________________________ # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.12 2002/10/21 02:40:06 jiri Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=9 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth", "secret", "alsdkhglaksdhfkloiwr") #modparam("auth", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth", "password_column", "password") # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwars==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (len_gt( max_len )) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # Do strict routing if pre-loaded route headers present rewriteFromRoute(); # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==sip.mycompany.com) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication # if (!www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) { # www_challenge("iptel.org", "0"); # break; # }; save("location"); break; }; # attempt handoff to PSTN if (uri=~"^sip:[0-9]*@sip.mycompany.com") { log(4, "Forwarding to PSTN\n"); forward(X.X.X.X,5060); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } _____________________________________________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: Emil To: Bo Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:43 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Bo, Jan just helped me with a similar problem. Debug level = 9 and fork t= no. Tail /var/log messages and you will get plenty of info. Emil ----- Original Message ----- From: Bo To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:35 AM Subject: [Serusers] SER log Hi, Does anyone have any clue on the following problem? I recompiled and installed SER in Redhat Linux 8.0. Unfortunately I tried all the possible options (debug level) in the ser.cfg, but the only messages I could see in the /var/log/messsages are as follows. Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: INFO: fifo process starting: 15316 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... What should I do to see the detailed debugs? Thanks, Bo

2 1

Re: [Serusers] SER log
by Bo 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

Hi Emil, Thanks for your infor. I tried and it still didn't work. Now I doubt if the /etc/ser/ser.cfg (see the following) takes effect or not. I changed the settings and if I ran the server by command ' # ser ', no problem. But if I ran it like ' # ser -f ser.cfg ', then it told me ERROR: bad config file (11 errors) Actually I didn't change too much on the default ser.cfg. Pls indicate. _________________________________________________________________________________ # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.12 2002/10/21 02:40:06 jiri Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=9 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=no log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! #loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth", "secret", "alsdkhglaksdhfkloiwr") #modparam("auth", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth", "password_column", "password") # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwars==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (len_gt( max_len )) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # Do strict routing if pre-loaded route headers present rewriteFromRoute(); # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==sip.mycompany.com) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication # if (!www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) { # www_challenge("iptel.org", "0"); # break; # }; save("location"); break; }; # attempt handoff to PSTN if (uri=~"^sip:[0-9]*@sip.mycompany.com") { log(4, "Forwarding to PSTN\n"); forward(X.X.X.X,5060); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } _____________________________________________________________________________ ----- Original Message ----- From: Emil To: Bo Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 5:43 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER log Hi Bo, Jan just helped me with a similar problem. Debug level = 9 and fork t= no. Tail /var/log messages and you will get plenty of info. Emil ----- Original Message ----- From: Bo To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:35 AM Subject: [Serusers] SER log Hi, Does anyone have any clue on the following problem? I recompiled and installed SER in Redhat Linux 8.0. Unfortunately I tried all the possible options (debug level) in the ser.cfg, but the only messages I could see in the /var/log/messsages are as follows. Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: INFO: fifo process starting: 15316 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... What should I do to see the detailed debugs? Thanks, Bo

1 0

[Serusers] SER log
by Bo 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

Hi, Does anyone have any clue on the following problem? I recompiled and installed SER in Redhat Linux 8.0. Unfortunately I tried all the possible options (debug level) in the ser.cfg, but the only messages I could see in the /var/log/messsages are as follows. Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15303]: INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: INFO: fifo process starting: 15316 Mar 14 17:56:49 dda ser[15316]: SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... What should I do to see the detailed debugs? Thanks, Bo

1 0

[Serusers] connecting two sites
by matthewh＠3d-computers.co.uk 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

hi guys/gals, I have two ser sites serving two different domains and I want to let them see each other. Earlier this week, someone on this list said that no special config had to be done to get this done, but I am having problems. Both the ser servers are on machines behind the firewalls for security. I have forwarded UDP ports 5060-5070 through to the ser servers. I can see people online going one way, but not the other. The site that can, is able to send messages to the other site and get a response back, but not vice versa. What firewall/forwarding config do I need? cheers, this really has me stumped :) ------------------------------------------------- This service is provided by 3d Computers Ltd. www.3d-computers.co.uk sales(a)3d-computers.co.uk

2 1

[Serusers] Cisco 7960 and authentication
by Emil 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

Hi all, Have installed and configured ser and everything works fine until I turn on authentication. I have a suspicion my problem resides in my route logic. This is how I modified the default ser.cfg file: route{ if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (len_gt( max_len )) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; rewriteFromRoute(); if (uri=~"mkc.co.za") { if (method=="REGISTER") { if (!www_authorize("mkc.co.za", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("mkc.co.za", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } Any ideas? Have gone through all the sql confs and sql seems fine (default installation), only added one user with serctl. Kind regards, Emil

2 1

RE: [Serusers] multiple registration on one user login
by Ng, Soo Sim 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

Thanks to all giving your thought and advice. SSng -----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:49 AM To: Ng, Soo Sim; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] multiple registration on one user login Hello, I fear that such a case can't be avoided with allowing only a single registration. If I steal your phone away from your desk, you will not register with it anymore, but I will and we will have exactly one valid registration. Leaving SIP phones with hard-wired passwords on your desk has simply the same potential as leaving your credit-card or cell-phone there. What can be done about fraud? User education -- don't leave your money and phone unattended. Hotline -- report stolen phones to lock the account. PIN Lock -- use phones which can log-off and log-on (I'm not aware of any now -- only 3com used to do that) -Jiri ps -- ability to move is a feature. I know people who are very glad to use Vonage's US phone number and move with their ATAs and the US phone number around in Europe. At 11:37 PM 3/5/2003, Ng, Soo Sim wrote: >Jiri, > >Scenario is providing IP Telephony to the household. >I am more concern about the security of the Hardphone. I am thinking of auto-provisioned the hardphone (eg C7960, ATA186) without subsriber intervention. What the subscriber know is their phone # (Just like legacy phone system). > >Since the Hardphone is 'hard-coded', the phone can move round the vicinity of the redisential area and still able to make a call. Potentially this will lead to abuse, as someone may take the phone to a different location when owner is not around and make a 'free' call, return back the phone and the billing still charge the original subsriber. > >Any other suggestion to counter this issue is much appreacited. > >SSng > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] >Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:18 AM >To: Ng, Soo Sim; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >Subject: Re: [Serusers] multiple registration on one user login > > >At 03:08 PM 3/4/2003, Ng, Soo Sim wrote: >>I have such requirements. In providing sip-based residential ip telephony, I would like to restrict each home subsriber is only allowed to register one UA per account. This would make easy for billing purposes and for security reasons. >> >>Is there a way to achieve this requirement with SER? > >If that is your desparate wish, it is little overhead to make you happy. >I'm still not sure though, it is a useful thing. > >Maybe an operator can make more revennues if my wife can accept calls at >any phone in my building and initiate calls in parallel with my doughter. > >What are exactly the billing/security reasons here? > >-Jiri -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

3 2

[Serusers] OPTIONS method
by lgfausak＠august.net 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

What, if anything, should the SER server do with a OPTIONS method? I am receiving this method, from a phone, right after the phone makes a conversation. That is, the final ACK is sent from the phone and a call is in progress when the phone decides to send an OPTIONS message. I thought OPTIONS was a pre-call sort of thing, not for the current call. Anyway, I thought I could just capture the OPTIONS method and send a 486 busy reply with sl_send_reply(). Didn't work. ---greg

5 6

[Serusers] �� : ��
by womanstyle＠hotmail.ru 14 Mar '03

14 Mar '03

1 0

[Serusers] Behaviour of SER with private parameters in request URI
by David.Rio＠alcatel.fr 13 Mar '03

13 Mar '03

Hello all I am using SER as a proxy server. Please let's consider the following scenario 1/ Step 1 A UAC registers to SER --------- | SER | --------- ^ | REGISTER for 'service(a)logical-element.domain' contact 'service@host' | | --------- | UAC | --------- 2/ Step 2 Another UAC tries to reach the previously registered user BUT WITH PRIVATE PARAMETERS in request URI ---------- | UAC | ---------- | | INVITE service(a)logical-element.domain;param1=value1;param2=value2 v --------- | SER | --------- | | INVITE service@host (sol 1) | or INVITE service@host;param1=value1;param2=value2 (sol 2) v --------- | UAC | --------- The translation from service(a)logical-element.domain to service@host is done in SER using 'lookup'. 3/ Problem : I observe that SER when translating the user@host part of the request URI does not recopy the private parameters, what I expected it to do. => I can not find any clear position in RFC 3261 (from my understanding of the RFC). Is it a bug in SER or does SER really implement the behaviour a standard SIP proxy should have ? Thanks for your answers -- David Rio Alcatel CIT - Rennes ASD France 33 2 99 87 47 18

2 1

[Serusers] remote connections
by Mat Harris 13 Mar '03

13 Mar '03

hi, I have just today started playing with SIPS at work and found ser fun. BTW, all the following is done with micro$oft messenger 4.6 for testing (eugh!) I have set it all up at home and am trying to connect from work. I know the connection is getting through the firewall because a tcpdump shows all the expected results, and I know that ser is running ok, because I can login from my home workstations. Does ser do any sort of access control based on ip addresses that may be causing it to reject my external connections? Also, I have set up the realm with mysql authentication and I can communicate with others on the same domain, but should I be able to communicate with other sips users of other private networks (as long as they allow it) without any configuration. Do I have to do something to make that work? cheers, and well done with a very easy to quick to install product, my boss loves it -- Mat Harris OpenGPG Public Key ID: C37D57D9 mat.harris(a)genestate.com www.genestate.com

2 1

[Serusers] new module
by Tirpák Miklós 13 Mar '03

13 Mar '03

Hi! I have writen a module, may be somebody is interested in it. It is used to determinate if a user has appropriate permission to establish a call. The permissions can be managed in configuration files very simular to hosts.allow and hosts.deny. Every value in the configuration files are regular expresions, so it is easy to define rules. Example for a rule: "^sip:361[0-9]*@abc.com$" EXCEPT "^sip:.*3@abc.com$", "^sip:.*4@abc.com$" : ALL Every PSTN endpoint beginning with 361 except those ending with 3 or 4 can establish calls with everybody. In general: from_list [EXCEPT from_list] : to_list [EXCEPT to_list] from_list and to_list are comma separated expressions Expressions are treated as case insensitive POSIX Extended RegularExpressions. Keyword ALL matches any expression. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miklos Tirpak Computer and Automation Research Institute e-mail : mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences phone : (361) 279-6011 H-1132. Budapest, Victor Hugo u 18-22 fax : (361) 279-6021

1 0

RE: [Serusers] multiple registration on one user login
by Ng, Soo Sim 13 Mar '03

13 Mar '03

Hi, I am thinking of locking the user hardphone MAC Address onto Layer 2 Switch level. This way even if the user move around their phone, it will be blocked. The disadvantage is that it will create opreration nightmare and will only work in ETTx environment. In a broadband wireless environment, there may be no layer 2 switch in between the network and subsriber. There are 2 categories of subscribers. One is only want to use their home phone just like what the legacy voice network do. They won't bother to know about username/password. (For example illiterate elderly citizen). I must cater for these kind of users. Yet provide a secure environment for them. Another is subscribers who want to have more flexibility. They may have hardphone, softphone, pda, notebook who can logon everywhere in the on-net network. These users may have more than one phone number to their home per user account. These users will have to be reseponsile for their username/password. I am looking for all possibbilities and limitations there is before drawing any implementation plan. So far, my testing is working well. SER, Cisco 7960, ATA186, Cisco Voice Gateway, Softphone/IPAQ w/WLAN, MSN Messenger, etc Thanks SSng -----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 7:30 PM To: Ng, Soo Sim Cc: Jiri Kuthan; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] multiple registration on one user login Hello, do you still need such a restriction ? Jan. On 10-03 11:12, Ng, Soo Sim wrote: > Thanks to all giving your thought and advice. > > SSng > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:49 AM > To: Ng, Soo Sim; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: RE: [Serusers] multiple registration on one user login > > > Hello, > > I fear that such a case can't be avoided with allowing only > a single registration. If I steal your phone away from your > desk, you will not register with it anymore, but I will and > we will have exactly one valid registration. Leaving SIP > phones with hard-wired passwords on your desk has simply the > same potential as leaving your credit-card or cell-phone there. > > What can be done about fraud? > > User education -- don't leave your money and phone unattended. > Hotline -- report stolen phones to lock the account. > PIN Lock -- use phones which can log-off and log-on (I'm not aware > of any now -- only 3com used to do that) > > -Jiri > > ps -- ability to move is a feature. I know people who are very glad > to use Vonage's US phone number and move with their ATAs and the > US phone number around in Europe. > > At 11:37 PM 3/5/2003, Ng, Soo Sim wrote: > >Jiri, > > > >Scenario is providing IP Telephony to the household. > >I am more concern about the security of the Hardphone. I am thinking of auto-provisioned the hardphone (eg C7960, ATA186) without subsriber intervention. What the subscriber know is their phone # (Just like legacy phone system). > > > >Since the Hardphone is 'hard-coded', the phone can move round the vicinity of the redisential area and still able to make a call. Potentially this will lead to abuse, as someone may take the phone to a different location when owner is not around and make a 'free' call, return back the phone and the billing still charge the original subsriber. > > > >Any other suggestion to counter this issue is much appreacited. > > > >SSng > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] > >Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:18 AM > >To: Ng, Soo Sim; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] multiple registration on one user login > > > > > >At 03:08 PM 3/4/2003, Ng, Soo Sim wrote: > >>I have such requirements. In providing sip-based residential ip telephony, I would like to restrict each home subsriber is only allowed to register one UA per account. This would make easy for billing purposes and for security reasons. > >> > >>Is there a way to achieve this requirement with SER? > > > >If that is your desparate wish, it is little overhead to make you happy. > >I'm still not sure though, it is a useful thing. > > > >Maybe an operator can make more revennues if my wife can accept calls at > >any phone in my building and initiate calls in parallel with my doughter. > > > >What are exactly the billing/security reasons here? > > > >-Jiri > > -- > Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/ > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users