- sr-users - kamailio.org

[Serusers] SER and TCP
by Cinzia Raineri 28 Jan '03

28 Jan '03

Hello, I would like know if SER support also the trasmission protocol TCP, or TLS. Thanks, Cinzia.

2 1

[Serusers] SIP2Jabber Presence Support
by jaime.gill＠orange.co.uk 28 Jan '03

28 Jan '03

Daniel, Not sure if it has been asked before. Is presence support from SIP to Jabber and viceversa completely working in cvs version? Regards, Jaime ******************************************************************************* Important. Confidentiality: This communication is intended for the above-named person and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any opinions expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of the company. If it has come to you in error you must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the sender immediately. Monitoring/Viruses Orange may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current legislation. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Orange PCS Limited is a subsidiary of Orange SA and is registered in England No 2178917, with its address at St James Court, Great Park Road, Almondsbury Park, Bradley Stoke, Bristol BS32 4QJ. *******************************************************************************

2 1

[Serusers] [Fwd: ser-0.8.10: Fehler beim Kompilierung der Quellencode.]
by Savasar Sinan UYGUR 28 Jan '03

28 Jan '03

1 0

[Serusers] Connection to Jabber server lost
by jaime.gill＠orange.co.uk 27 Jan '03

27 Jan '03

Hi, When using the Jabber Gateway, some users get the following error from time to time: ERROR: Connection to Jabber server lost. You have to login to Jabber server again (join again the conferences that you were participating, too). sip_to_jabber_gateway says: INFO: Your are now offline in Jabber network. Thank you for using SIP-Jabber gateway. Do you know the reason why these messages appear and if it is possible to avoid them? Thanks, Jaime ******************************************************************************* Important. Confidentiality: This communication is intended for the above-named person and may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any opinions expressed in this communication are not necessarily those of the company. If it has come to you in error you must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the sender immediately. Monitoring/Viruses Orange may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current legislation. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free. Orange PCS Limited is a subsidiary of Orange SA and is registered in England No 2178917, with its address at St James Court, Great Park Road, Almondsbury Park, Bradley Stoke, Bristol BS32 4QJ. *******************************************************************************

2 1

[Serusers] Header Field P-Hint: USRLOC
by Karsten Knuettel 26 Jan '03

26 Jan '03

Hi, does anybody know anything about the P-Hint Header Field added from SER? Cheers, Karsten

2 1

[Serusers] Change in the default log file
by Daniel Perez 23 Jan '03

23 Jan '03

Is there any way to change the defaul log file to a special SER.log file ????? Daniel

4 3

Fwd: [Serusers] Multiple potential memory leaks in ser
by Jiri Kuthan 23 Jan '03

23 Jan '03

Maxim, Thank you very much for your report. I'm not the code owner who has the last word, but I agree there is a memory leak. It seems to me that insert_new_lump family is ok as long as the calling functions care to free their lump buffers on failure -- that's where the leak lives. Which imho happens at few places on CVS: +insert_new_lump_before - save_ruri in rr/loose.c - textops/append_hf_helper.c - (on contrary, it is ok in maxfwd/add_maxfwd_header, rr functions calling insert_RR, and msg_translator.c) +insert_new_lump_after - search_append_f in textops.c - replace_f in textops.c - (ok in build_req_buf...) The memory leak is unlikely to occur, as it is triggered by lack of private memory which (unlike shmem) hardly gets exhausted -- so operation is fortunately not affected. It will be fixed in the next release. -Jiri ps -- I swear on cscope :) >Folks, > >I've noticed that there are multiple potential memory leaks in SER. >The problem is that if a insert_new_lump*() function returns a NULL >for some reason (currently the only condition is memory allocation >error), it doesn't free the memory buffer passed to it and most of >the code doesn't care to deallocate that buffer after NULL is returned. >It could be easily fixed and probably needs to before the next version >is released. > >Thanks! > >-Maxim >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

2 1

[Serusers] Question on gateway routing through UA proxy
by John Todd 22 Jan '03

22 Jan '03

Goal: To learn about ser in a "non-critical" and very small PBX-like environment so as to be able to understand nuances of the system in a production environment at a later date at various firms whose owners who have expressed to me a high degree of interest in SIP call routing for larger enterprise and CLEC implementations. Sub-Goal: to make all calls into and out of my house routed via IP to alternate destinations based on ser routing configuration. I have subscribed to a long-distance plan via "iconnecthere.com", I have a PRI gateway configured at a remote location (for calls into two area codes only) and my plan is to have a Cisco 2610 with FXO card for terminating my "local" phone line. My house phones are all Cisco ATA-186 devices. Based on called number, my calls will be sent to the iconnecthere.com SIP service, the Cisco PRI gateway, or the Cisco 2610 single-line gateway. Calls will also be routed appropriately based on number called on an inbound basis from any of those three gateway systems (PRI, 2610, or iconnecthere.com) Progress: I have phone-to-phone calling working well, and I have phone-to-PRI gateway calling working well in both directions. I have not yet received the 2610, so I do not have the single-line analog gateway running, but I don't expect any issues with that system, as I understand the Cisco implementation of inbound/outbound VOIP sessions. Problem: My "iconnecthere.com" account is a username/password protected account which (of course) requires a UA at my side of the connection. To forward calls from the various phones in the house, I would need to have something re-write my username/password requests on the fly when they are sent out to the iconnecthere.com SIP proxies/gateways. My first assumption is that I'll need a (sigh) B2BUA to act as a gateway, running (for convenience) on the same UNIX platform as ser. After thinking about it for a while, I am uncertain if that is required, but at this point I can't determine what I need to do. I would appreciate hints on: a) Wether I need a B2BUA at all, and if not, what config options should I be looking at in ser? b) If I do need a B2BUA, what would you recommend? I'm using OpenBSD as my platform, and (personally) I'd like to stay away from Java for the moment. Continuing discussion: I could see this as a fairly useful toolkit trick for a small business who wants to replace their phone switch with SER or ser-like systems. If you've got an office with 10 people, it may make economic sense to simply get "generic" accounts with a SIP long distance gateway provider like iconnecthere.com (there are others) and allocate each of those accounts to individuals in the organization. This is not a solution for a large-scale operation for the various reasons outlined in the http://www.iptel.org/info/trends/#b2bua texts, but the number of small-scale shops out there is very large and a simply understood package (and simply billed) is what would be desired for many places who still use under ~10 analog lines for outbound dialing from their PBX. Any outbound calls to certain prefixes would always be pushed through a specific account for LD calling. Additionally, inbound calling through a similar service would have to also come in via the same mechanism, with a REGISTER request being sent by the B2BUA and all subsequent calls being routed through the SER proxy. PS: I'd appreciate any open-source hints on how to get an ATA-186 (v2.15) running behind NAT with ser on the "outside" of the NAT, without statically configuring the "NAT" address on the ATA-186 every time the outside address changes. Lots of keyword matches found on Google, but very few clues to be scraped from the resulting documents as to "how" do it from the server side. JT

3 6

[Serusers] Too much shared memory demanded: 33554432
by NIBLE 21 Jan '03

21 Jan '03

Greetings to all and happy new year I'm in the process of installing ser 0.8.10 on Linux (intel) and when I run Too much shared memory the "ser"executable I receive the following error message "Too much shared memory demanded: 33554432" When I turn the debug option on I receive the following: 0(4019) WARNING: hash function optimized for 1024 entries 0(4019) WARNING: use of 65536 entries may lead to unflat distribution 0(4019) ERROR: shm_mem_init: could not attach shared memory segment: Invalid argument 0(4019) could not initialize shared memory pool, exiting... Too much shared memory demanded: 33554432 Any ideas? Thanks __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com

2 1

[Serusers] sip server
by geetha shree 21 Jan '03

21 Jan '03

Dear Sir/Madam, We are developing a sip stack. We wanted to know whether you can provide any sip server for testing our stack. We also wanted to know the procedures invloved in it. Thanks in advance Geetha Catch all the cricket action. Download Yahoo! Score tracker

3 2

[Serusers] Troubles using b2bua as a accounting and call duration limiting module for SER router
by Maxim Sobolev 21 Jan '03

21 Jan '03

Dear Sirs, I am having some strange problems when trying to use b2bua for accounting and call duration limiting with SER proxy server. The idea is simple: since the SER can route SIP messages depending on their source address, we can force incoming SIP messages to be passed to B2BUA for accounting purposes first, and after the same request re-enters the proxy from B2BUA pass it to the final destination. Call flow looks like the following: ----- |UA2| ----- ^ | |4 | ----- 3 ------- ----- 1 | |<-----------| | |UA1|---->|SER| 2 |B2BUA| ----- | |----------->| | ----- ------- For some reason, it doesn't work in such configuration. The problem is that B2BUA's UAC keeps resending `200 OK' replies ingnoring ACKs it receives from UA2 until timeout hits, after which it considers the call dead, despite the fact that both UA1 and UA2 think that the call is established. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that it sends to and receives messages from the same host (SER), but I don't think that this should be a problem, since those two call legs have different call id's, so that b2bua should be able to distinguish between them easily. Attached please find tcpdump logs of one such session, here 192.168.1.1 is UA1 (originating), 192.168.0.9 is UA2, 192.168.1.100 is the host running both SER and B2BUA (the former uses port 5060, while the latter - 5065). There are two files: ser-b2bua.log is the log of udp exchange between SER and B2BUA and ser-ua1ua2.log - log of exchange between SER and UA1/UA2. Any ideas are appreciated. Thanks! -Maxim

3 7

Re: [Serusers] Rewriting URI in the Contact field
by Maxim Sobolev 20 Jan '03

20 Jan '03

On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 03:22:33PM +0100, Jiri Kuthan wrote: > At 09:53 PM 1/13/2003, you wrote: > >Attached please find the patch, which implements t_on_positive() > >approach. Now my config looks like the following and everything now > >works as expected: > > thanks for the patch -- I will try to integrate it as I move ahead > with other changes to TM. Does your nathelper module work now? Attached please find more fresh patch with several bugs smashed. It is probably the last one on this topic, because it works reasonably well and we now have moved to adjusting b2bua for our needs (mostly radius auth/acc). In addition to nathelper module, this patch implements rport support as specified in the correstponding IETF draft. Thanks! -Maxim

2 1

[Serusers] Multiple potential memory leaks in ser
by Maxim Sobolev 20 Jan '03

20 Jan '03

Folks, I've noticed that there are multiple potential memory leaks in SER. The problem is that if a insert_new_lump*() function returns a NULL for some reason (currently the only condition is memory allocation error), it doesn't free the memory buffer passed to it and most of the code doesn't care to deallocate that buffer after NULL is returned. It could be easily fixed and probably needs to before the next version is released. Thanks! -Maxim

1 0

RE: [Serusers] [RFC] ideas about new dialog module
by Schliesser, Benson 20 Jan '03

20 Jan '03

I'm thinking that the 'forceful termination' should have options for redirection, i.e. to an announcements (or other media) server, etc. Is this in line with your thoughts? -Benson > -----Original Message----- > From: Maxim Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:37 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org; kapitan(a)portaone.com > Subject: [Serusers] [RFC] ideas about new dialog module > > > Hi, > > I am thinking about writing a new module for SER, which will track SIP > dialogs and will serve as an abstraction layer for other modules, much > like the tm module now. We need such module for 2 reasons: > > 1. Call accounting. Our billing engine is based on the assumption that > a node provides accounting information for completed calls, not for > individual transactions. It is easier for us to extend proxy with > similar features than to modify billing engine to do transaction > matching. > > 2. Debit card application. Currently, there is no way to use SER for > debit card applications, where it is necessary to set the maximum > duration of the call and terminate it forcefully if that duration is > exceeded. > > The raw idea is as follows: > > - the module will register callbacks with tm.register_tmcb(), probably > TMCB_REQUEST_IN and TMCB_REPLY_IN ones and will match INVITEs to BYEs > keeping information about the state of ongoing sessions in the shared > memory. > > - the module will provide interested modules with ability to register > several callbacks, i.e. on dialog creation/teardown and yet another > callback on dialog timeouts (more about that below). > > - the module will provide utility functions for forceful termination > of any ongoing dialog. > > - when invoking dialog creation callback function, the module will > give the function opportunity to install a timer on that dialog, so > that if the dialog is still active after timer expires, then some > action is performed. For example, in the debit card applications, in > such case the accounting module can decide to forcefully terminate a > dialog. > > What do you think? > > -Maxim > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

2 1

[Serusers] [RFC] ideas about new dialog module
by Maxim Sobolev 20 Jan '03

20 Jan '03

Hi, I am thinking about writing a new module for SER, which will track SIP dialogs and will serve as an abstraction layer for other modules, much like the tm module now. We need such module for 2 reasons: 1. Call accounting. Our billing engine is based on the assumption that a node provides accounting information for completed calls, not for individual transactions. It is easier for us to extend proxy with similar features than to modify billing engine to do transaction matching. 2. Debit card application. Currently, there is no way to use SER for debit card applications, where it is necessary to set the maximum duration of the call and terminate it forcefully if that duration is exceeded. The raw idea is as follows: - the module will register callbacks with tm.register_tmcb(), probably TMCB_REQUEST_IN and TMCB_REPLY_IN ones and will match INVITEs to BYEs keeping information about the state of ongoing sessions in the shared memory. - the module will provide interested modules with ability to register several callbacks, i.e. on dialog creation/teardown and yet another callback on dialog timeouts (more about that below). - the module will provide utility functions for forceful termination of any ongoing dialog. - when invoking dialog creation callback function, the module will give the function opportunity to install a timer on that dialog, so that if the dialog is still active after timer expires, then some action is performed. For example, in the debit card applications, in such case the accounting module can decide to forcefully terminate a dialog. What do you think? -Maxim

3 4

[Serusers] radius_auth problem
by Joe_chen 19 Jan '03

19 Jan '03

hi, I have a problem with radius_auth, i use raidus_auth module as www-authentication ,but something is wrong, the free-radius server need the PW_PASSWORD attribute for authentication, while the ser's radius_auth module doesn't send the PW_PASSWORD attribute, i can't find the password from the REGISTER message, there is a NONCE like nonce="3e1947180000000040c0e6240c7f8145a64eb654ce9a14e0" and encrypted with MD5. Do i need get the user's password and how to get user's the password? please help. thanks.

2 1

[Serusers] Troubles using b2bua as a accounting and call duration limiting module for SER router
by Maxim Sobolev 19 Jan '03

19 Jan '03

Dear Sirs, I am having some strange problems when trying to use b2bua for accounting and call duration limiting with SER proxy server. The idea is simple: since the SER can route SIP messages depending on their source address, we can force incoming SIP messages to be passed to B2BUA for accounting purposes first, and after the same request re-enters the proxy from B2BUA pass it to the final destination. Call flow looks like the following: ----- |UA2| ----- ^ | |4 | ----- 3 ------- ----- 1 | |<-----------| | |UA1|---->|SER| 2 |B2BUA| ----- | |----------->| | ----- ------- For some reason, it doesn't work in such configuration. The problem is that B2BUA's UAC keeps resending `200 OK' replies ingnoring ACKs it receives from UA2 until timeout hits, after which it considers the call dead, despite the fact that both UA1 and UA2 think that the call is established. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that it sends to and receives messages from the same host (SER), but I don't think that this should be a problem, since those two call legs have different call id's, so that b2bua should be able to distinguish between them easily. Attached please find tcpdump logs of one such session, here 192.168.1.1 is UA1 (originating), 192.168.0.9 is UA2, 192.168.1.100 is the host running both SER and B2BUA (the former uses port 5060, while the latter - 5065). There are two files: ser-b2bua.log is the log of udp exchange between SER and B2BUA and ser-ua1ua2.log - log of exchange between SER and UA1/UA2. Any ideas are appreciated. Thanks! -Maxim

3 2

[Serusers] problem with phone authentication
by lgfausak＠august.net 18 Jan '03

18 Jan '03

This works with my eStara soft phone client: --------------cut # route[1], REGISTER block # REGISTER messages destined for our realm are forwarded here. # after a successful registration a customer can receive calls. # route[1] { if(!www_authorize("augustvoice.net", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("augustvoice.net", "0"); break; }; log("here is a register"); if(!save("location")) { sl_reply_error(); }; break; } ---------------uncut However, when I try to get my Cisco 7960 to authorize it fails. I've appended the ngrep trace of the failed transaction. The only difference I can see is that the line argument algorithm=MD5 is in the WWW-Authenticate line. Do I have to do something special to accept a MD5 password??? ---greg Greg Fausak ngrep trace: --------cut # U 216.87.128.66:5060 -> 64.90.42.25:5060 REGISTER sip:64.90.42.25 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=f6645848fea927b96489c6a32e39a956.0. From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25. To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25. Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101. Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:42:54 GMT. CSeq: 101 REGISTER. Contact: <sip:2424377@216.87.128.66>. Expires: 3600. Content-Length: 0. . # U 64.90.42.25:5060 -> 216.87.128.66:5060 SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=f6645848fea927b96489c6a32e39a956.0. From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25. To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25;tag=af30b122c950f7c4343d8a73d2eaf455.2313. Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101. CSeq: 101 REGISTER. WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="augustvoice.net", nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72", algorithm=MD5. Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 register.augustvoice.net:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=2262 req_src_ip=216.87.128.66 in_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 out_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 via_cnt==1". . # U 216.87.128.66:5060 -> 64.90.42.25:5060 REGISTER sip:64.90.42.25 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=e71832739a0647b7ba91baa50bcc1497.0. From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25. To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25. Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101. Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 00:42:54 GMT. CSeq: 102 REGISTER. Authorization: Digest username="2424377",realm="augustvoice.net",uri="sip:64.90.42.25",response="039cee96c9321217973c4914314fc3ed",nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72",algorithm=MD5. Contact: <sip:2424377@216.87.128.66>. Expires: 3600. Content-Length: 0. . # U 64.90.42.25:5060 -> 216.87.128.66:5060 SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.128.66:5060;branch=e71832739a0647b7ba91baa50bcc1497.0. From: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25. To: sip:2424377@64.90.42.25;tag=af30b122c950f7c4343d8a73d2eaf455.2581. Call-ID: 003094c4-3d2f0002-23a6c56d-0dcb5c8f(a)192.168.100.101. CSeq: 102 REGISTER. WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="augustvoice.net", nonce="3e28a43a000000005b6a30b9fa105b98b2fd9d1aa59c4c72", algorithm=MD5. Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux)). Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 register.augustvoice.net:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=2263 req_src_ip=216.87.128.66 in_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 out_uri=sip:64.90.42.25 via_cnt==1". .

3 2

[Serusers] ata
by Jan Janak 18 Jan '03

18 Jan '03

Hello, your messages about CISCO ATA reminds me that I have also one (a preproduction unit originally made by Komodo), so I upgraded firmware to 2.15 and tried it behind a symmetric NAT. It works, I had to enable portforwarding for signalling and media and setup properly outer address of the NAT box in the phone. Once you finish your NAThelper module, I would like to give it a try and see if it works without modifications of the NAT box. So I can help you to test the code if you want. regards, Jan.

1 0

[Serusers] [HEADS UP] security vulnerability in ser 0.8.10
by Maxim Sobolev 18 Jan '03

18 Jan '03

Folks, While playing with SER I found that I can trigger repeatable crash when doing REGISTER multiple times. Quick glance at the code in question revealed that indeed, when constructing reply to REGISTER message, SER uses fixed-lengh buffer to put all non-expired contacts for that user and doesn't bother to check for overflow. The bug could be easily exploited by a complete stranger on servers that don't perform authentification of REGISTER requests, and by an user with a valid credintals on server that do authentification. Mounting attack leads to denial of service. Attached please find fake REGISTER message, which if sent to open server kills it (nc -u my.sip.server 5060 < register.killser), and patch to fix the problem. -Maxim

3 2

[Serusers] Fwd: Guest Passes to TMC Internet Telephony Conference & Expo
by Jiri Kuthan 18 Jan '03

18 Jan '03

just in case someone would like to show up there. first come, first served. -jiri >Hello! > >Internet Telephony Conference & Expo is right around the corner! As a speaker and participant in the conference program, TMC would like to offer you (2) conference passes free of charge. These passes can be given to colleagues, clients, or guests that you would like to invite to hear you speak and to the show. These passes would be full conference passes and would allow that person to go to the entire event, not just to your session. > >If you would like to take advantage of this offer all you need to do is e-mail the following >information for each person: > >Name >Title >Company name >Address >Phone >Fax >E-mail > >Put "Internet Telephony Miami Speaker Conference Program" in the subject line and you are done! The pass will be sent to them in the mail. > >As a speaker, you will already have your speaker pass prepared. Please pick up your pass at the event registration. > >PLEASE NOTE - this program is not to replace an existing conference pass. No monies that might have been paid will be refunded.

1 0

RE: [Serusers] Password problem with ser and mysql
by Klaus Darilion 17 Jan '03

17 Jan '03

Yes, that was my problem! Thank you very mutch! Are you involved in the SHIP (http://voip.sh.cvut.cz/about.shtml) project? (because of your emailaddress). I read that you are using Vocal as voice mail server. Do you have an installation guide how to setup such a system with vocal and ser? regards, Klaus > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Janak [mailto:J.Janak@sh.cvut.cz] > Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 1:14 PM > To: Klaus Darilion > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Password problem with ser and mysql > > > Hello, > > auth is not the only module that uses database. If you have > enabled support for database in usrloc (by modparam("usrloc", > "db_mode", 1) or modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) then you > have to change usrloc's password as well. Try to use the > following: modparam("usrloc", "db_url", > "sql://ser:klaus@localhost/ser") > > regards, Jan.cd > > On 17-01 11:56, Klaus Darilion wrote: > > Hello Jan! > > > > Comments inline. > > > default username and password for auth module is > > > serro:47serro11, if you are able to login as ser:heslo, then > > > username and password can be changed. > > > > > If you change your password in mysql, you must change it for > > > ser@localhost For example: grant ALL on ser.* to > > > ser@localhost identified by 'klaus'; > > > > I changed it for localhost, but it won't work. > > > > > If you use something like grant ALL on ser.* to ser > > > identified by 'klaus'; then the server will be unable to > > > login to the database. > > > > > > Try also the following: > > > mysql -h localhost -u ser -p ser > > > > I changed the password of ser@localhost to 'klaus'. I can > connect to > > mysql with mysql -h localhost -u ser -p ser > > and password 'klaus'. I changed the password in ser.cfg to 'klaus' > > modparam("auth", "db_url", "sql://ser:klaus@localhost/ser") > > , but still the ser server can't start: > > : connect_db(): Access denied for user: 'ser@localhost' (Using > > password: YES) > > > > > > I still think there must be a bug somewhere, so that ser tries to > > connect with the 'heslo' password. > > > > regards, > > Klaus > > > > > This will prompt for password, if you are unable to login > > > with your password, ser will be unable to login as well > > > (probably because you changed password for ser and not for > > > ser@localhost) > > > > > > regards, Jan. > > > > > > On 16-01 18:34, Klaus Darilion wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > I have sucessfully installed the ser server (0.8.10 from > > > rpms) with an > > > > mysql database. When I use the standard password for the user > > > > "ser" > > > > everything works fine. But if I change the password from > > > "heslo" to a > > > > new one, for example "klaus" instead of "heslo" (of > course in the > > > > mysql-database und in the config file) the ser server > can not start > > > > up. > > > > > > > > Following are some different configurations and my suggestions > > > > what > > > > could be the problem. > > > > > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", > > > > "sql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") > > > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > > > mySQL-ser-password: heslo > > > > ---> works fine > > > > > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", > > > > "sql://ser:klaus@localhost/ser") > > > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > > > mySQL-ser-password: klaus > > > > ---> doesn't work: connect_db(): Access denied for user: > > > > ---> 'ser@localhost' > > > > (Using password: YES) > > > > should work, so I tried another user > > > > > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", > > > "sql://root:XXXXX@localhost/ser") > > > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > > > mySQL-ser-password: heslo > > > > ---> works fine > > > > > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", > > > "sql://root:XXXXX@localhost/ser") > > > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > > > mySQL-ser-password: klaus > > > > ---> doesn't work: connect_db(): Access denied for user: > > > > ---> 'ser@localhost' > > > > (Using password: YES) > > > > very strange, because I told ser to connect as root. Is ser > > > using the > > > > default user/password instead of the configured one? > > > > > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", > > > "sql://root:YYYYY@localhost/ser") > > > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > > > mySQL-ser-password: heslo > > > > ---> doesn't work: connect_db(): Access denied for user: > > > > 'root@localhost' (Using password: YES) > > > > of course it doesn't work, wrong password. So ser cares > about the > > > > settings in ser.cfg > > > > > > > > So my suggestion is that ser connects several times to the > > > > database > > > > whereas one time it uses the configured user/password and > > > another time > > > > it uses the default user/password - maybe a bug in the auth > > > > module? > > > > > > > > Or does somebody of you changed the password successfuly? > > > > > > > > It would be nice if you can help me. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Klaus > > > > > > > > My system is: > > > > Linux version 2.4.18-14 (bhcompile(a)astest.test.redhat.com) > > > (gcc version > > > > 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)) #1 Wed Sep 4 > > > 12:13:11 EDT 2002 > > > > MySQL 3.23.52 > > > > ser-0.8.10-2.i386.rpm > > > > ser-mysql-0.8.10-2.i386.rpm > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Serusers mailing list > > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >

2 1

RE: [Serusers] Password problem with ser and mysql
by Jiri Kuthan 17 Jan '03

17 Jan '03

At 01:59 PM 1/17/2003, Klaus Darilion wrote: >Yes, that was my problem! Thank you very mutch! > >Are you involved in the SHIP (http://voip.sh.cvut.cz/about.shtml) >project? (because of your emailaddress). Jan is. >I read that you are using Vocal >as voice mail server. Do you have an installation guide how to setup >such a system with vocal and ser? I tried to deploy the vocal voicemail a while ago and it did not meet me expectations. We are working on our own now. -Jiri

1 0

RE: [Serusers] Password problem with ser and mysql
by Klaus Darilion 17 Jan '03

17 Jan '03

Hello Jan! Comments inline. > default username and password for auth module is > serro:47serro11, if you are able to login as ser:heslo, then > username and password can be changed. > If you change your password in mysql, you must change it for > ser@localhost For example: grant ALL on ser.* to > ser@localhost identified by 'klaus'; I changed it for localhost, but it won't work. > If you use something like grant ALL on ser.* to ser > identified by 'klaus'; then the server will be unable to > login to the database. > > Try also the following: > mysql -h localhost -u ser -p ser I changed the password of ser@localhost to 'klaus'. I can connect to mysql with mysql -h localhost -u ser -p ser and password 'klaus'. I changed the password in ser.cfg to 'klaus' modparam("auth", "db_url", "sql://ser:klaus@localhost/ser") , but still the ser server can't start: : connect_db(): Access denied for user: 'ser@localhost' (Using password: YES) I still think there must be a bug somewhere, so that ser tries to connect with the 'heslo' password. regards, Klaus > This will prompt for password, if you are unable to login > with your password, ser will be unable to login as well > (probably because you changed password for ser and not for > ser@localhost) > > regards, Jan. > > On 16-01 18:34, Klaus Darilion wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I have sucessfully installed the ser server (0.8.10 from > rpms) with an > > mysql database. When I use the standard password for the user "ser" > > everything works fine. But if I change the password from > "heslo" to a > > new one, for example "klaus" instead of "heslo" (of course in the > > mysql-database und in the config file) the ser server can not start > > up. > > > > Following are some different configurations and my suggestions what > > could be the problem. > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", "sql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser") > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > mySQL-ser-password: heslo > > ---> works fine > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", "sql://ser:klaus@localhost/ser") > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > mySQL-ser-password: klaus > > ---> doesn't work: connect_db(): Access denied for user: > > ---> 'ser@localhost' > > (Using password: YES) > > should work, so I tried another user > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", > "sql://root:XXXXX@localhost/ser") > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > mySQL-ser-password: heslo > > ---> works fine > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", > "sql://root:XXXXX@localhost/ser") > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > mySQL-ser-password: klaus > > ---> doesn't work: connect_db(): Access denied for user: > > ---> 'ser@localhost' > > (Using password: YES) > > very strange, because I told ser to connect as root. Is ser > using the > > default user/password instead of the configured one? > > > > ser.cfg: modparam("auth", "db_url", > "sql://root:YYYYY@localhost/ser") > > mySQL-root-password: XXXXX > > mySQL-ser-password: heslo > > ---> doesn't work: connect_db(): Access denied for user: > > 'root@localhost' (Using password: YES) > > of course it doesn't work, wrong password. So ser cares about the > > settings in ser.cfg > > > > So my suggestion is that ser connects several times to the database > > whereas one time it uses the configured user/password and > another time > > it uses the default user/password - maybe a bug in the auth module? > > > > Or does somebody of you changed the password successfuly? > > > > It would be nice if you can help me. > > > > Thanks, > > Klaus > > > > My system is: > > Linux version 2.4.18-14 (bhcompile(a)astest.test.redhat.com) > (gcc version > > 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)) #1 Wed Sep 4 > 12:13:11 EDT 2002 > > MySQL 3.23.52 > > ser-0.8.10-2.i386.rpm > > ser-mysql-0.8.10-2.i386.rpm > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >

2 1

[Serusers] SER & IPv6
by Antonino Mendes Monteiro 17 Jan '03

17 Jan '03

Hello, I would like to know if SER supports IPv6. If not, do you have any plans for it ? When ? Thanks in advance, Antonino

2 1

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users