- sr-users - kamailio.org

Integration with mobile oprators
by sina yazdanian 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Dear Kamailio Technical team I’m Sina from a small software development company in Middle-East. We are interested in your product. For R&D research we need some documents about your product. Your support would be appreciated in case of sharing document. We need document about* SIP server integration with Mobile operator*. I would be grateful if you support me and the team to complete research. Best Regards Sina Yazdanian

2 1

how to see banned address after rule it
by PICCORO McKAY Lenz 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

i configure rules for routing banned ip and i want to see where i can autdit this issues.. i mean where i can automatically define a cron setup that grep those logs definitios.. where are loggin those all? my rules are: define at begining of kamailio.cfg "#!WITH_ANTIFLOOD", later add: #!ifdef WITH_ANTIFLOOD loadmodule "htable.so" loadmodule "pike.so" modparam("pike", "sampling_time_unit", 2) modparam("pike", "reqs_density_per_unit", 16) modparam("pike", "remove_latency", 4) modparam("htable", "htable", "ipban=>size=8;autoexpire=300;") #!endif later routing definitions: route[REQINIT] { if(src_ip!=myself) { if($sht(ipban=>$si)!=$null) { xdbg("request from blocked IP - $rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); exit; } if (!pike_check_req()) { xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: pike blocking $rm from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); $sht(ipban=>$si) = 1; exit; } } if($ua =~ "friendly-scanner|sipcli|VaxSIPUserAgent") { xlog("L_ALERT","ALERT: friendly canings from $fu (IP:$si:$sp)\n"); exit; } if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } if(is_method("OPTIONS") && uri==myself && $rU==$null) { sl_send_reply("200","Keepalive"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("1511", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP message from $si:$sp\n"); exit; } } Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

3 3

Dispatcher No destinations available
by Cristian Livadaru 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hi, I have a Kamailio running as Load Balancer and it works great but since a couple of weeks I kept noticing 404s in Homer and when looked into it they came from Kamailio. ``` route[LOADBALANCE] { #ds_select_dst(destination_set, algorithm) function chooses the destination for the call. For this it can use a lot of algorithms. #Alg. 0 is the default one that does the the choosing over the call ID hash #Alg. 4 is a Round-Robin #Alg. 10 is the one that chooses the destination based on the minimum load of all destinations if(!ds_select_dst("1", "4")) { #if we are here that means no destination is available. We notify the user by 404 and exit the script. xlog("L_NOTICE", "No destination available!"); send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } xlog("L_NOTICE", "Routing call to <$ru> via <$du>\n"); #set the no_reply_recieved timeout to 2 second ... adjust the value to your need #note: The first value "0" is invite timeout .. we do not need to change it #This means that is the selected media server fails to respond within 2 seconds the failure_route "MANAGE_FAILURE" is called #note: this implies that ale the signaling from media servers on the way back to the user goes through the proxy as well t_set_fr(0,2000); t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); return; } ``` The two asterisks behind it seem fine and I can’t really see why this started happening. Also I thing that returning 404 might be misleading, wouldn’t it be better if I would return 503 instead? I enabled debugging in Kamailio but can’t really seem to notice anything wrong here: ``` Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/udp_server.c:491]: udp_rcv_loop(): received on udp socket: (106/100/1104) [[INVITE sip:431230123@213.137.140.230:5060 SIP/2.0 0D 0A Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 196.27.235.76:5060;branch=z9h]] Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:604]: parse_msg(): SIP Request: Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:606]: parse_msg(): method: <INVITE> Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:431230123@213.137.140.230:5060> Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK0080827005DD9C0D8E963B2EA293>; state=16 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:492]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:494]: parse_headers(): this is the first via Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=10 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field(): <To> [52]; uri=[sip:431230123@213.137.140.230] Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:172]: get_hdr_field(): to body ["431230123" <sip:431230123@213.137.140.230> Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: ] Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq <CSeq>: <36825> <INVITE> Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:200]: receive_msg(): --- received sip message - request - call-id: [2610e00004f5-5c66843f-6400386f-2c1b8100-6c4782(a)127.0.0.1] - cseq: [36825 INVITE] Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:248]: receive_msg(): preparing to run routing scripts... Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:185]: parse_to_param(): add param: tag=0080827005DD9C0D8E96C55CF6CD Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace.c:507]: sip_trace_store_db(): database connection not initialized Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:498]: pipport2su(): the port string is 5060 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:498]: pipport2su(): the port string is 5060 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/proxy.c:264]: mk_proxy(): doing DNS lookup... Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:302]: trace_send_hep2_duplicate(): setting up the socket_info Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) NOTICE: <script>: Tracing 6(6668) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:74]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 70 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:183]: get_hdr_field(): content_length=355 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: sanity [sanity_mod.c:256]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 1 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:559]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 14==9 && [213.137.140.230] == [127.0.0.1] Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:566]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:559]: grep_sock_info(): checking if host==us: 14==14 && [213.137.140.230] == [213.137.140.230] Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: <core> [core/socket_info.c:566]: grep_sock_info(): checking if port 5060 (advertise 0) matches port 5060 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) NOTICE: <script>: OPTIONS from 196.27.235.76:5060 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:120]: has_totag(): no totag Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1018]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7f7e7edd3be8) id=6845 global id=6844 T start=(nil) Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:476]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=29308, isACK=0 Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:435]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:659]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1087]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7f7e7edd3be8) id=6845 global id=6845 T end=(nil) Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:1209]: is_direction(): param ftag not found Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:1832]: ds_select_dst_limit(): set [1] Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:1935]: ds_select_dst_limit(): alg hash [1] Feb 15 09:50:28 wlb kamailio[6659]: 6(6668) NOTICE: <script>: No destination available! 6(6668) DEBUG: sl [sl.c:282]: send_reply(): reply in stateless mode (sl) ``` My kamailio.cfg ``` #!KAMAILIO # # sample config file for dispatcher module # - load balancing of VoIP calls with round robin # - no TPC listening # - don't dispatch REGISTER and presence requests # # Kamailio (OpenSER) SIP Server v3.2 # - web: http://www.kamailio.org # - git: http://sip-router.org # # Direct your questions about this file to: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org # # Refer to the Core CookBook at http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php # for an explanation of possible statements, functions and parameters. # # Several features can be enabled using '#!define WITH_FEATURE' directives: # # *** To run in debug mode: # - define WITH_DEBUG # ####### Global Parameters ######### #!define WITH_HOMER #!define WITH_DEBUG #!ifdef WITH_DEBUG debug=4 log_stderror=yes #!else debug=2 log_stderror=no #!endif memdbg=5 memlog=5 log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0 fork=yes children=4 /* comment the next line to enable TCP */ disable_tcp=yes /* uncomment the next line to disable the auto discovery of local aliases based on revers DNS on IPs (default on) */ auto_aliases=yes /* add local domain aliases */ port=5060 /* uncomment and configure the following line if you want Kamailio to bind on a specific interface/port/proto (default bind on all available) */ # listen=udp:127.0.0.1:5060 sip_warning=no ####### Modules Section ######## #set module path mpath="/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/" # loadmodule "db_mysql.so" # loadmodule "mi_fifo.so" loadmodule "jsonrpcs.so" loadmodule "kex.so" loadmodule "corex.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "usrloc.so" loadmodule "registrar.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "siputils.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "sanity.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" loadmodule "cfg_rpc.so" loadmodule "acc.so" loadmodule "counters.so" loadmodule "dispatcher.so" #!ifdef WITH_HOMER loadmodule "siptrace.so" #!endif #loadmodule "kex.so" #loadmodule "tm.so" #loadmodule "tmx.so" #loadmodule "sl.so" #loadmodule "rr.so" #loadmodule "pv.so" #loadmodule "maxfwd.so" #loadmodule "textops.so" #loadmodule "siputils.so" #loadmodule "xlog.so" #loadmodule "sanity.so" ## loadmodule "ctl.so" #loadmodule "mi_rpc.so" #loadmodule "acc.so" # ----- acc params ----- modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 3) modparam("acc", "log_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd;src_ip=$si") #!ifdef WITH_HOMER # check IP and port of your capture node modparam("siptrace", "duplicate_uri", "sip:213.136.47.31:9060") modparam("siptrace", "hep_mode_on", 1) modparam("siptrace", "trace_to_database", 0) modparam("siptrace", "trace_flag", 22) modparam("siptrace", "trace_on", 1) #!endif # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(AVP_DST)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(AVP_GRP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(AVP_CNT)") modparam("dispatcher", "sock_avp", "$avp(dssocket)") modparam("dispatcher", "attrs_avp", "$avp(dsattrs)") #set next two parameters if you want to enable balance alg. no. 10 #modparam("dispatcher", "dstid_avp", "$avp(dsdstid)") #modparam("dispatcher", "ds_hash_size", 8) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 20) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio@example.com") #modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "INFO") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshold", 1) #configure codes or classes of SIP replies to list only allowed replies (i.e. when temporarily unavailable=480) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes", "class=2;code=480;code=404") ####### Routing Logic ######## # main request routing logic route { #!ifdef WITH_HOMER #start duplicate the SIP message now sip_trace(); setflag(22); xlog("L_NOTICE","Tracing"); #!endif # per request initial checks route(REQINIT); # handle requests within SIP dialogs route(WITHINDLG); # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) t_relay(); exit; } t_check_trans(); # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) # - remove preloaded route headers remove_hf("Route"); if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) record_route(); #if (is_method("INVITE")) #{ # ds_select_domain("1","4"); # #sl_send_reply("300","Redirect"); # #t_relay(); # exit; #} # account only INVITEs if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(1); # do accounting } # handle presence related requests route(PRESENCE); # handle registrations route(REGISTRAR); if ($rU==$null) { # request with no Username in RURI sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); exit; } route(LOADBALANCE); route(RELAY); } # Per SIP request initial checks route[REQINIT] { if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("1511", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP message from $si:$sp\n"); exit; } # Reply to options if (uri==myself) { xlog("L_NOTICE","OPTIONS from $si:$sp\n"); if ((method==OPTIONS) && (! uri=~"sip:.*[@]+.*")) { xlog("L_NOTICE","answering options $si:$sp\n"); options_reply(); } } } # Handle requests within SIP dialogs route[WITHINDLG] { if (has_totag()) { # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { if (is_method("BYE")) { setflag(1); # do accounting ... setflag(3); # ... even if the transaction fails } route(RELAY); } else { if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) { # in-dialog subscribe requests route(PRESENCE); exit; } if ( is_method("ACK") ) { if ( t_check_trans() ) { # non loose-route, but stateful ACK; # must be ACK after a 487 or e.g. 404 from upstream server t_relay(); exit; } else { # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard. exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); } exit; } } # Handle SIP registrations route[REGISTRAR] { if(!is_method("REGISTER")) return; #sl_send_reply("404", "No registrar"); #t_relay(); if(!ds_select_dst("1", "4")) { sl_send_reply("404", "No registrar"); exit; } forward(); exit; } # Presence server route route[PRESENCE] { if(!is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")) return; sl_send_reply("404", "Not here"); exit; } route[LOADBALANCE] { #ds_select_dst(destination_set, algorithm) function chooses the destination for the call. For this it can use a lot of algorithms. #Alg. 0 is the default one that does the the choosing over the call ID hash #Alg. 4 is a Round-Robin #Alg. 10 is the one that chooses the destination based on the minimum load of all destinations if(!ds_select_dst("1", "4")) { #if we are here that means no destination is available. We notify the user by 404 and exit the script. xlog("L_NOTICE", "No destination available!"); send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } xlog("L_NOTICE", "Routing call to <$ru> via <$du>\n"); #set the no_reply_recieved timeout to 2 second ... adjust the value to your need #note: The first value "0" is invite timeout .. we do not need to change it #This means that is the selected media server fails to respond within 2 seconds the failure_route "MANAGE_FAILURE" is called #note: this implies that ale the signaling from media servers on the way back to the user goes through the proxy as well t_set_fr(0,2000); t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); return; } # manage failure routing cases failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] { # route(NATMANAGE); if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } xlog("L_NOTICE", "Media server $du failed to answer, selecting other one!"); # next DST - only for 500 reply or local timeout (set by t_set_fr()) if (t_check_status("500") || t_branch_timeout() || !t_branch_replied()) { #we mark the destination Inactive and Probing ds_mark_dst("ip"); #select the new destination if(ds_next_dst()) { #again set local timeout for reply t_set_fr(0,2000); t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); route(RELAY); exit; } else { #last available node failed to reply, no other destinations available send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } } } route[RELAY] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "going to <$ru> via <$du>"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } ``` and my dispatcher.list ``` # line format # id(int,auto) setid(int) destination(string) flags(int) priority(int) attrs(string) description(string) 1 sip:196.27.235.76:5060 1 sip:213.137.140.230:5060 ``` any help to understand these issues would be greatly appreciated. Cris --- Cristian Livadaru LcX IT Solutions Web: http://lcx.at/ Tel: +43 1 37 37 37 Fax: +43 1 37 37 37 - 25 **24/7 Support: 0900 474 455** (1,81€/Min)

2 3

Info: Kamailio World 2019 - First group of speakers
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hello, a short note to let everybody know that we have published the details for the first group of speakers at Kamailio World 2019 (May 6-8, in Berlin) - you can read more about at: * https://www.kamailioworld.com/k07/2019/02/kamailio-world-2019-first-group-o… * https://www.kamailioworld.com/k07/speakers/ The target is to finish the review of the speaking proposals by end of the month, then start working on the schedule. We received a lot more than it can be accommodated, but we will try to select all that are very interesting by having several short sessions/lightning talks. There will be few new concepts, trying to engage more the participants as well as use better the evening time for social networking with a boat trip at the end of first day, in addition to the cocktail party on the second day. Hoping to meet many of you in Berlin at Kamailio World 2019! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com

1 0

Branches Routes
by Nicolas Breuer 18 Feb '19

18 Feb '19

Hello, We have a main route where we try multiple destinations (SIP Providers) one by one in case of failure. We modify the $ru in branch routes. I have to manipulate the $rU in the main route (adding 000 and strip 000) to create the second branch. Otherwise I have an error in Kamailio , is it expected ?? Feb 16 10:29:13 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3837]: NOTICE: RU => 0003280033800 (Branch 0) * Adding 000 in main route Feb 16 10:29:13 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3837]: NOTICE: RU => 3280033800 (Branch 0) * Strip "000" in main route * Timeout of first provider (going to main route again with an other branch) Feb 16 10:29:15 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3840]: NOTICE: RU => 0003280033800 (Branch 1) Feb 16 10:29:15 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3840]: NOTICE: RU => 3280033800 (Branch 1) * Call OK I will now remove the prefix & strip command in main route Feb 16 10:32:11 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3951]: NOTICE: RU => 3280033800 (Branch 0) Feb 16 10:32:11 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3951]: NOTICE: RU => 3280033800 (Branch 0) Feb 16 10:32:11 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3951]: NOTICE: Branch to sip:3280033800@XXXXXXXXXXX * Timeout Feb 16 10:32:13 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3955]: NOTICE: RU => 3280033800 (Branch 1) Feb 16 10:32:13 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3955]: NOTICE: RU => 3280033800 (Branch 1) Feb 16 10:32:13 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3955]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1728]: t_forward_nonack(): no branches for forwarding Feb 16 10:32:13 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3955]: ERROR: tm [tm.c:1548]: _w_t_relay_to(): t_forward_noack failed Feb 16 10:32:13 proxy2 /usr/sbin/kamailio[3955]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (6/SL) Any suggestions ?

3 4

kamailio with oracle database
by eyas barhouk 17 Feb '19

17 Feb '19

hello dears i'm trying to run kamailio 5.1.7 with Oracle database and after building it from source with the needed module and installing Oracle Instant Client when i'm trying to run kamailio i get the following Error : ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:498]: load_module(): could not open module </usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/db_oracle.so>: libclntsh.so.12.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory so is there any way to make the libclntsh.so.12.1 open shared object ?? best regards Eyas

2 2

Re. SRTP configuration Rtpengine
by vinod mn 16 Feb '19

16 Feb '19

Hi I am not able to do SRTP configuration properly this the kamailio configuration *route[NATMANAGE] {* *rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection RTP/SAVP");}* I can see in SDP RTP/SAVP but still the packets are RTP. clients used linphone-android (media-encryption is SRTP ) and 3cx-windows-client

2 1

Log/Alerts Volume
by Daniel Greenwald 15 Feb '19

15 Feb '19

Curious how other folks are dealing with the volume of logs that Kamailio generates. We are currently sending them to syslog and alerting on WARN and above but the amount of alert noise is unbearable. For example (there are many variations): ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:297]: tcp_read_data(): error reading: Connection reset by peer INVITE:WARNING: sanity [sanity.c:776]: check_parse_uris(): failed to parse >From header INVITE:ERROR: <core> [core/parser/parse_from.c:75]: parse_from_header(): b ad From header The fact that these are WARN/ERROR level and from core makes me wonder how we can possibly make alerts relevant. Any input would be appreciated. Thanks, Daniel G

3 3

Memory allocator was called from cdp: diameter_avp.c:365
by Denys Pozniak 15 Feb '19

15 Feb '19

Hello! I have faced with Kamailio (5.1.7) crashes, probably it is connected to cdp module, please check the source of issue: 14(5649) INFO: cdp [receiver.c:455]: receiver_process(): receiver_process(): [diameter1.dev] Receiver process doing init on new process... 14(5649) INFO: cdp [receiver.c:188]: add_serviced_peer(): add_serviced_peer(): Adding serviced_peer_t to receiver for peer [diameter1.dev] 14(5649) INFO: cdp [receiver.c:460]: receiver_process(): receiver_process(): [diameter1.dev] Receiver process starting up... 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp_receiver_peer=diameter1.dev Serviced Peers: --- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: log_serviced_peers(): Peer: diameter1.dev TCP Socket: -1 Recv.State: 0 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp_receiver_peer=diameter1.dev Serviced Peers: --- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: log_serviced_peers(): Peer: diameter1.dev TCP Socket: -1 Recv.State: 0 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 16(5651) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 16 rank 1001: cdp [cdp_timer] 16(5651) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 16 rank 1001: cdp_avp [cdp_timer] 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp_avp [cdp_avp_mod.c:211]: cdp_avp_child_init(): Initializing child in module cdp_avp for rank [1001] 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: acc [cdp_acceptor] 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: uac [cdp_acceptor] 16(5651) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 16 rank 1001: ims_charging [cdp_timer] 16(5651) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 16 rank 1001: ims_dialog [cdp_timer] 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: htable [cdp_acceptor] 15(5650) DEBUG: htable [htable.c:236]: child_init(): rank is (1000) 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: carrierroute [cdp_acceptor] 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: dispatcher [cdp_acceptor] 16(5651) INFO: cdp [timer.c:205]: timer_process(): Timer process starting up... 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: cdp [cdp_acceptor] 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: cdp_avp [cdp_acceptor] 15(5650) DEBUG: cdp_avp [cdp_avp_mod.c:211]: cdp_avp_child_init(): Initializing child in module cdp_avp for rank [1000] 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: ims_charging [cdp_acceptor] 15(5650) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 15 rank 1000: ims_dialog [cdp_acceptor] 15(5650) INFO: cdp [acceptor.c:81]: acceptor_process(): Acceptor process starting up... 15(5650) DEBUG: cdp [tcp_accept.c:114]: create_socket(): create_sockets: create socket and bind for IPv4... 15(5650) WARNING: cdp [tcp_accept.c:121]: create_socket(): create_socket(): Trying to open/bind/listen on 10.10.10.10 port 38680 15(5650) WARNING: cdp [tcp_accept.c:146]: create_socket(): create_socket(): Successful socket open/bind/listen on 10.10.10.10 port 38680 15(5650) INFO: cdp [acceptor.c:95]: acceptor_process(): Acceptor opened sockets. Entering accept loop ... [root@10-10-10-10 kamailio]# 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: kex [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: kex [kex_mod.c:157]: child_init(): rank is (-4) 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [sruid.c:106]: sruid_init(): root for sruid is [srid-5c658bbb-1614-] (0 / 19) 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: corex [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: tm [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: tm [callid.c:137]: child_init_callid(): callid: ' 46ac84cd57961b27-5652(a)10.10.10.10' 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: tmx [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: tmx [tmx_mod.c:261]: child_init(): rank is (-4) 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: sl [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: usrloc [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [sruid.c:106]: sruid_init(): root for sruid is [ulcx-5c658bbb-1614-] (0 / 19) 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: registrar [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [sruid.c:106]: sruid_init(): root for sruid is [uloc-5c658bbb-1614-] (0 / 19) 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: ctl [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: acc [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: uac [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: htable [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: htable [htable.c:236]: child_init(): rank is (-4) 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: carrierroute [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: dispatcher [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: cdp [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: cdp_avp [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: cdp_avp [cdp_avp_mod.c:211]: cdp_avp_child_init(): Initializing child in module cdp_avp for rank [-4] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: ims_charging [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:942]: init_mod_child(): idx 17 rank -4: ims_dialog [tcp main process] 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/local_timer.c:61]: init_local_timer(): timer_list between 0xa6e0a8 and 0xab20a8 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 7, 4, 0x7fbdd97d7bec), fd_no=0 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 8, 4, 0x7fbdd97d7c78), fd_no=1 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 9, 4, 0x7fbdd97d7d04), fd_no=2 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 10, 4, 0x7fbdd97d7d90), fd_no=3 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 11, 4, 0x7fbdd97d7e1c), fd_no=4 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 12, 4, 0x7fbdd97d7ea8), fd_no=5 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 13, 4, 0x7fbdd97d7f34), fd_no=6 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 15, 4, 0x7fbdd97d7fc0), fd_no=7 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 4, 4, 0x7fbdd97d804c), fd_no=8 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 16, 4, 0x7fbdd97d80d8), fd_no=9 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 17, 4, 0x7fbdd97d8164), fd_no=10 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 18, 4, 0x7fbdd97d81f0), fd_no=11 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 23, 4, 0x7fbdd97d827c), fd_no=12 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 24, 4, 0x7fbdd97d8308), fd_no=13 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 25, 4, 0x7fbdd97d8394), fd_no=14 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:380]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xa6dee0, 26, 4, 0x7fbdd97d8420), fd_no=15 5(5640) DEBUG: ims_charging [ro_timer.c:252]: ro_timer_routine(): getting expired ro-sessions 5(5640) DEBUG: ims_charging [ro_timer.c:211]: get_expired_ro_sessions(): my ticks are [32829471] 13(5648) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp receiver peer unknown Serviced Peers: --- 13(5648) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp [peermanager.c:263]: peer_timer(): peer_timer(): taking care of peers... 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp [peermanager.c:280]: peer_timer(): peer_timer(): Peer diameter1.dev State 0 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:90]: sm_process(): sm_process(): Peer diameter1.dev State Closed Event Start 16(5651) INFO: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:525]: I_Snd_Conn_Req(): I_Snd_Conn_Req(): Peer diameter1.dev 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp_receiver_peer=diameter1.dev Serviced Peers: --- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: log_serviced_peers(): Peer: diameter1.dev TCP Socket: -1 Recv.State: 0 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 16(5651) INFO: cdp [receiver.c:875]: peer_connect(): peer_connect(): Trying to connect to 10.10.10.20 port 3868 16(5651) INFO: cdp [receiver.c:954]: peer_connect(): peer_connect(): Peer diameter1.dev:3868 connected 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:702]: receive_loop(): select_recv(): There is something on the fd exchange pipe 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:711]: receive_loop(): select_recv(): fd exchange pipe says fd [8] for peer 0x7fbdd979e368:[diameter1.dev] 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:90]: sm_process(): sm_process(): Peer diameter1.dev State Wait_Conn_Ack Event I_Rcv_Conn_Ack 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [diameter_msg.c:184]: AAANewMessage(): AAANewMessage: param session received null and it's a request!! 14(5649) ERROR: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:634]: I_Snd_CER(): I_Snd_CER(): Error on finding local host address > Socket operation on non-socket 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [diameter_msg.c:81]: AAABuildMsgBuffer(): AAABuildMsgBuffer(): len=184 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:1013]: peer_send_msg(): peer_send_msg(): Pipe push [0x7fbdd97e0788] 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp_receiver_peer=diameter1.dev Serviced Peers: --- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: log_serviced_peers(): Peer: diameter1.dev TCP Socket: 8 Recv.State: 0 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:756]: receive_loop(): select_recv(): There is something on the send pipe 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:769]: receive_loop(): select_recv(): Send pipe says [0x7fbdd97e0788] 8 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [diameter_msg.c:410]: AAAFreeMessage(): AAAFreeMessage: Freeing message (0x7fbdd97e0788) 257 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp_receiver_peer=diameter1.dev Serviced Peers: --- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: log_serviced_peers(): Peer: diameter1.dev TCP Socket: 8 Recv.State: 0 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp [peermanager.c:143]: log_peer_list(): --- Peer List: --- 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp [peermanager.c:145]: log_peer_list(): State of peer: Wait_I_CEA FQDN: diameter1.dev Port: 3868 Is dynamic 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp [peermanager.c:149]: log_peer_list(): ------------------ 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp [session.c:396]: cdp_sessions_log(): ------- CDP Sessions ---------------- 16(5651) DEBUG: cdp [session.c:431]: cdp_sessions_log(): ------------------------------------- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp_receiver_peer=diameter1.dev Serviced Peers: --- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: log_serviced_peers(): Peer: diameter1.dev TCP Socket: 8 Recv.State: 1 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:579]: do_receive(): receive_loop(): [diameter1.dev] Recv Version 1 Length 172 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp_receiver_peer=diameter1.dev Serviced Peers: --- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: log_serviced_peers(): Peer: diameter1.dev TCP Socket: 8 Recv.State: 2 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:1107]: receive_message(): receive_message(): [diameter1.dev] Recv msg 257 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:90]: sm_process(): sm_process(): Peer diameter1.dev State Wait_I_CEA Event I_Rcv_CEA 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:698]: count_Supported_Vendor_Id_AVPS(): Found 1 Supported_Vendor AVPS14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:681]: add_peer_application(): Application 0 of maximum 1 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:750]: save_peer_applications(): Found Supported Vendor for Application 0: 10415 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:681]: add_peer_application(): Application 1 of maximum 1 14(5649) DEBUG: cdp [diameter_msg.c:410]: AAAFreeMessage(): AAAFreeMessage: Freeing message (0x7fbdd97e0788) 257 14(5649) CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:149]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: prev. fragm. tail overwritten(28af, abcdefed)[0x7fbdd97e0c98:0x7fbdd97e0cd0]! Memory allocator was called from cdp: diameter_avp.c:365. Fragment marked by cdp: diameter_avp.c:142. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:504. 5(5640) DEBUG: ims_charging [ro_timer.c:252]: ro_timer_routine(): getting expired ro-sessions 5(5640) DEBUG: ims_charging [ro_timer.c:211]: get_expired_ro_sessions(): my ticks are [32829472] 13(5648) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp receiver peer unknown Serviced Peers: --- 13(5648) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 15(5650) DEBUG: cdp [tcp_accept.c:221]: accept_loop(): accept_loop(): No connection attempts 5(5640) DEBUG: ims_charging [ro_timer.c:252]: ro_timer_routine(): getting expired ro-sessions 5(5640) DEBUG: ims_charging [ro_timer.c:211]: get_expired_ro_sessions(): my ticks are [32829473] 13(5648) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:106]: log_serviced_peers(): --- Receiver cdp receiver peer unknown Serviced Peers: --- 13(5648) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:114]: log_serviced_peers(): -------------------------------------------------------- 17(5652) CRITICAL: <core> [core/pass_fd.c:277]: receive_fd(): EOF on 24 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:3513]: handle_ser_child(): dead child 14, pid 5649 (shutting down?) 17(5652) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:602]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0xa6dee0, 24, -1, 0x0) fd_no=16 called 0(5635) ALERT: <core> [main.c:739]: handle_sigs(): child process 5649 exited by a signal 6 0(5635) ALERT: <core> [main.c:742]: handle_sigs(): core was generated 0(5635) INFO: <core> [main.c:764]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD 0(5635) DEBUG: <core> [main.c:766]: handle_sigs(): terminating due to SIGCHLD 16(5651) INFO: <core> [main.c:819]: sig_usr(): signal 15 received GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.6.1-114.el7 Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type "show copying" and "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu". For bug reporting instructions, please see: <http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>... Reading symbols from /usr/sbin/kamailio...Reading symbols from /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/kamailio.debug...done. done. [New LWP 5649] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `kamailio -f kamailio.cfg -E'. Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. #0 0x00007fbde6015207 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.17-260.el7_6.3.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.5.8-3.el7.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.15.1-37.el7_6.x86_64 libcom_err-1.42.9-13.el7.x86_64 libgcc-4.8.5-36.el7.x86_64 libselinux-2.5-14.1.el7.x86_64 libstdc++-4.8.5-36.el7.x86_64 libxml2-2.9.1-6.el7_2.3.x86_64 mariadb-libs-5.5.60-1.el7_5.x86_64 openssl-libs-1.0.2k-16.el7.x86_64 pcre-8.32-17.el7.x86_64 xz-libs-5.2.2-1.el7.x86_64 zlib-1.2.7-18.el7.x86_64 (gdb) bt full #0 0x00007fbde6015207 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x00007fbde60168f8 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x0000000000673469 in qm_debug_check_frag (qm=0x7fbdd94fd000, f=0x7fbdd97e0c98, file=0x7fbdde6bb992 "cdp: diameter_avp.c", line=365, efile=0x7dc6b7 "core/mem/q_malloc.c", eline=504) at core/mem/q_malloc.c:151 __FUNCTION__ = "qm_debug_check_frag" #3 0x00000000006765ec in qm_free (qmp=0x7fbdd94fd000, p=0x7fbdd97e0cd0, file=0x7fbdde6bb992 "cdp: diameter_avp.c", func=0x7fbdde6bd478 <__FUNCTION__.7016> "AAAFreeAVP", line=365, mname=0x7fbdde6bb7c0 "cdp") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:504 qm = 0x7fbdd94fd000 f = 0x7fbdd97e0c98 size = 140730526467984 next = 0x7a8db8 prev = 0x7a8db8 __FUNCTION__ = "qm_free" #4 0x0000000000680148 in qm_shm_free (qmp=0x7fbdd94fd000, p=0x7fbdd97e0cd0, file=0x7fbdde6bb992 "cdp: diameter_avp.c", func=0x7fbdde6bd478 <__FUNCTION__.7016> "AAAFreeAVP", line=365, mname=0x7fbdde6bb7c0 "cdp") at core/mem/q_malloc.c:1268 No locals. #5 0x00007fbdde696e61 in AAAFreeAVP (avp=0x7ffe610a0860) at diameter_avp.c:365 __FUNCTION__ = "AAAFreeAVP" #6 0x00007fbdde65c88f in AAAFreeAVPList (avpList=0x7fbdd97e07d8) at diameter_msg.c:396 avp_t = 0x7fbdd97e0cd0 avp = 0x7fbdd97e0bb8 #7 0x00007fbdde65cc4c in AAAFreeMessage (msg=0x7ffe610a0910) at diameter_msg.c:416 __FUNCTION__ = "AAAFreeMessage" #8 0x00007fbdde63f05e in Process_CEA (p=0x7fbdd979e368, cea=0x7fbdd97e0788) at peerstatemachine.c:804 avp = 0x7fbdd97e10b0 #9 0x00007fbdde638223 in sm_process (p=0x7fbdd979e368, event=I_Rcv_CEA, msg=0x7fbdd97e0788, peer_locked=0, sock=8) at peerstatemachine.c:166 result_code = -563425872 next_event = 32701 msg_received = 0 __FUNCTION__ = "sm_process" #10 0x00007fbdde6874be in receive_message (msg=0x7fbdd97e0788, sp=0x7fbde59538b0) at receiver.c:1147 avp1 = 0xde6b2c50 avp2 = 0x7fbdd97e0990 __FUNCTION__ = "receive_message" #11 0x00007fbdde67c5bb in do_receive (sp=0x7fbde59538b0) at receiver.c:598 cnt = 152 n = 152 version = 1 dst = 0x7fbdd97e1164 "" dmsg = 0x7fbdd97e0788 __FUNCTION__ = "do_receive" #12 0x00007fbdde68038e in receive_loop (original_peer=0x7fbdd979e368) at receiver.c:805 rfds = {__fds_bits = {256, 0 <repeats 15 times>}} efds = {__fds_bits = {0 <repeats 16 times>}} tv = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 999998} n = 1 max = 21 cnt = 1 msg = 0x0 sp = 0x7fbde59538b0 sp2 = 0x7fbde59538b0 p = 0x7fbdd979e368 fd = 8 fd_exchange_pipe_local = 21 __FUNCTION__ = "receive_loop" #13 0x00007fbdde679aec in receiver_process (p=0x7fbdd979e368) at receiver.c:464 ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- __FUNCTION__ = "receiver_process" #14 0x00007fbdde62a7d5 in diameter_peer_start (blocking=0) at diameter_peer.c:289 pid = 0 k = -1 p = 0x7fbdd979e368 __FUNCTION__ = "diameter_peer_start" #15 0x00007fbdde61c9a8 in cdp_child_init (rank=0) at cdp_mod.c:243 __FUNCTION__ = "cdp_child_init" #16 0x000000000053b6b1 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fbde5885150, rank=0) at core/sr_module.c:943 __FUNCTION__ = "init_mod_child" #17 0x000000000053b353 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fbde5885dc8, rank=0) at core/sr_module.c:939 __FUNCTION__ = "init_mod_child" #18 0x000000000053b353 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fbde5886190, rank=0) at core/sr_module.c:939 __FUNCTION__ = "init_mod_child" #19 0x000000000053b353 in init_mod_child (m=0x7fbde58865d0, rank=0) at core/sr_module.c:939 __FUNCTION__ = "init_mod_child" #20 0x000000000053ba85 in init_child (rank=0) at core/sr_module.c:970 No locals. #21 0x0000000000424fe5 in main_loop () at main.c:1701 i = 4 pid = 5641 si = 0x0 si_desc = "udp receiver child=3 sock=10.10.10.10:5060\000\275\177\000\000\300\023\na\376\177\000\000\022\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\004\000\000\000\000\000\000\200\000\000\000\000\000\263\215z", '\000' <repeats 13 times>, "\220\026\na\376\177\000\000\207\"\003\346\275\177\000\000\260yw\000\000\000\000\000\060;\223\345\275\177\000" nrprocs = 4 woneinit = 1 __FUNCTION__ = "main_loop" #22 0x000000000042b994 in main (argc=4, argv=0x7ffe610a1778) at main.c:2642 cfg_stream = 0x103a020 c = -1 r = 0 tmp = 0x0 tmp_len = 0 port = 0 proto = 0 options = 0x758c10 ":f:cm:M:dVIhEeb:l:L:n:vKrRDTN:W:w:t:u:g:P:G:SQ:O:a:A:x:X:Y:" ret = -1 seed = 1364069336 rfd = 4 debug_save = 0 debug_flag = 0 dont_fork_cnt = 0 n_lst = 0x0 p = 0x0 st = {st_dev = 19, st_ino = 68292, st_nlink = 2, st_mode = 16832, st_uid = 995, st_gid = 994, __pad0 = 0, st_rdev = 0, st_size = 40, st_blksize = 4096, st_blocks = 0, st_atim = {tv_sec = 1550156643, tv_nsec = 630000000}, st_mtim = {tv_sec = 1550158563, tv_nsec = 502470819}, st_ctim = {tv_sec = 1550158563, tv_nsec = 502470819}, __unused = {0, 0, 0}} __FUNCTION__ = "main" (gdb) version: kamailio 5.1.7 (x86_64/linux) 567df3 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 567df3 compiled on 02:06:09 Feb 2 2019 with gcc 4.8.5 -- BR, Denys Pozniak

2 2

Assemble struct sip_uri back to string?
by Ivan Ribakov 15 Feb '19

15 Feb '19

Hi all, does anyone know if there is a C function available in some module/header that assembles parsed sip_uri struct back into a single buffer? I’ve been looking at msg_parser.h (where sip_uri struct is defined) and parse_uri.h, but I can’t see anything of that kind. Thanks in advance, Ivan

3 3

Fwd: pv_buffer_size config value actually ignored?
by Enrico Bandiera 14 Feb '19

14 Feb '19

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Enrico Bandiera <enrico.bandiera(a)cloud.timenet.it> Date: mer 13 feb 2019 alle ore 09:18 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] pv_buffer_size config value actually ignored? To: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Hello Daniel, yes we do use that $avp for a log line which is actually a big json, the $avp is composed by multiple jansson_append calls and at the end an xlog() calls prints it Could it also be that I'm miscalculating because of the encoding? 4K utf8 characters could be more than 4K (but I don't think there are so many multibytes characters to let it reach the 8K limit) Il giorno mer 13 feb 2019 alle ore 09:15 Daniel-Constantin Mierla < miconda(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hello, > > where do you use that avp, because for the avp value itself, that buffer > is not used -- avp values are stored in shared memory. > > Do you use that avp in xlog() or other functions parameters? > > Cheers, > Daniel > On 13.02.19 09:10, Enrico Bandiera wrote: > > Hi, I'm having some strange issues with a somewhat big $avp value, when it > reaches a size of about 4K I get this error: > > 29(47) ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:1452]: pv_printf(): no more space for > spec value > 29(47) ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:1461]: pv_printf(): buffer overflow – > increase the buffer size... > > In the docs I read that the default pv_buffer_size is 8K, I still tried to > enforce it to something bigger and checked the logs to be sure it was set: > > 0(384) DEBUG: <core> [core/pvapi.c:2062]: pv_init_buffer(): PV print > buffer initialized to [40][16384] > > But still when reaching the 4K size inside the $avp that error comes out, > is there any limit I'm not aware of? > > Thanks, > Enrico. > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda > Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com > Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com > >

2 6

TM Module - Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred (477/TM)
by Ilie Soltanici 14 Feb '19

14 Feb '19

Hi List, Can someone give a hint related to this issue, please? On other messages, I found that this problem may happen why variable $du is empty, but in my case looks that it's present: Config File: if (!t_relay()) { switch ($retcode) { case -1: xlogl("L_ERR", "[$cfg(route)] Generic Internal Error\n"); xlogl("L_ERR", "[$cfg(route)] | $du/$ru |\n"); break; Log File: [RELAY] Generic Internal Error [RELAY] | sip:192.168.180.23:15109/sip:1003@ 192.168.180.23:15109 | sl [sl_funcs.c:372]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) Also, as I understand this may happen when there is a problem on the physical network, i'm not sure that is my case - because kamailio and asterisk are 2 VM's running on the same Physical Server, and both their interfaces are connected to the same Virtual Switch. There is no firewalls/selinux on those servers. Can someone help please?

2 1

Kamailio/Dispatcher failure routing to SRV record
by Jesse Strahn 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Hi all, I'm hoping someone can help me with this as I am baffled. I have a server running Kamailio with dispatcher. I am trying to direct calls from kamailio to an SRV record but am receiving a 404 error on the calls. If I instead place one of the hostnames from the SRV record in my dispatcher.list, the call completes fine. Contents of dispatcher.list look like: 1 sip:bvr.production.instance:5060 Nslookup from the Kamailio server for SRV record: nslookup -type=SRV _sip._udp.bvr.production.instance Server: 10.0.0.2 Address: 10.0.0.2#53 Non-authoritative answer: _sip._udp.bvr.production.instance service = 1 10 5060 ip-10-100-79-143.production.instance. _sip._udp.bvr.production.instance service = 1 10 5060 ip-10-100-96-92.production.instance. Again, if I put 1 sip: ip-10-100-96-92.production.instance:5060 into the dispatcher.list, the call routes fine. Is there some configuration within Kamailio required to route to an SRV record in this way? I haven't found anything indicating that is the case. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jesse

2 2

Mysql to hastable conversion
by Duarte Rocha 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Greetings, I have Kamailio has an SBC and i'm using a MySQL database to store all the relevant configurations and settings regarding the NAP's, Users, Numbers, etc. That being said, i'm having lots of of performance issues originated by the queries. In order to solve that i think the best way to proceed would be to implement hashtables. However, i would like to keep Sql DB's for easier configuration and having them automatically transformed into hashtables. Is there a simple way to do this? As i see, the htable module is able to load from a DB, but i understand it, the table should be already in "hashtable form". Does kamailio has any way to solve this or should i use external tools? Best Regards, Duarte Rocha

2 1

kamailio with oracle data base
by eyas barhouk 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Hello Community i'm trying to build kamailio on top of oracle D.B so is there any way to configure kamailio to deal with Oracle D.B and call functions from it ? Thanks in advance. Regards Eyas

4 9

Cannot get message routing for websockets "invalid" URI
by Sergey Safarov 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

I have configured websocket usage using this module description https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/websocket.html Added registrar and usrloc modules Registration saved using this block route[REGISTRAR] { if(!is_method("REGISTER")) return; if (!save("location")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Location save error\n"); sl_reply_error(); } } Now in database i can see WebRTC client registration { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "Domains": [{ "Domain": { "Domain": "location", "Size": 1024, "AoRs": [{ "Info": { "AoR": "1000", "HashID": 924766747, "Contacts": [{ "Contact": { "Address": "sips:1000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid ;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss", "Expires": 155, "Q": -1, "Call-ID": "0c818ac1-5e77-bd4c-b7fe-a135d6c6a4bf", "CSeq": 61442, "User-Agent": "IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04", "Received": "[not set]", "Path": "[not set]", "State": "CS_SYNC", "Flags": 0, "CFlags": 0, "Socket": "tls:192.168.2.10:7443", "Methods": -1, "Ruid": "uloc-5c643a67-4b56-1", "Instance": "[not set]", "Reg-Id": 0, "Server-Id": 0, "Tcpconn-Id": 2, "Keepalive": 0, "Last-Keepalive": 1550074434, "Last-Modified": 1550074434 } }] } } ], "Stats": { "Records": 1, "Max-Slots": 1 } } }] }, "id": 19493 } Now I try deliver call to WebRTC client. Kamailio receives message INVITE sip:1001@192.168.30.2 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.30.2:45060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK5gaK3B38egZQH Route: <sip:192.168.2.10> Max-Forwards: 70 From: "" <sip:0000000000@192.168.30.2>;tag=8e7Za8pD6pcKg To: <sip:1001@192.168.30.2> Call-ID: 989274f0-aa4d-1237-08a1-94b86deaeed5 CSeq: 483510 INVITE Contact: <sip:mod_sofia@192.168.30.2:45060> User-Agent: FreeSWITCH-mod_sofia/1.8.4+git-20181228T070140Z~a0377e9677~64bit Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, presence, as-feature-event, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 621 X-FS-Support: update_display,send_info Remote-Party-ID: <sip:0000000000@192.168.30.2 >;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off Expected that Kamailio using follow config block route message to WEbRTC client via websocket. route[FROM_FS] { record_route(); if (!lookup("location")) { $var(rc) = $rc; t_newtran(); switch ($var(rc)) { case -1: case -3: send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -2: send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); exit; } } route(RELAY); exit; } But really Kamailio try resolve "sips:1000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid" URI via DNS and deliver for non locally connected device 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=238 a=16 n=if 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=231 a=41 n=isflagset 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[DEFAULT_ROUTE] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=232 a=5 n=route 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[FROM_FS] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=266 a=24 n=record_route 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[FROM_FS] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=281 a=16 n=if 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[FROM_FS] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=267 a=25 n=lookup 3(19341) DEBUG: registrar [lookup.c:255]: lookup_helper(): contact for [1000] found by address 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[FROM_FS] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=281 a=5 n=route 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=289 a=16 n=if 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=286 a=24 n=t_relay 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1326]: t_newtran(): msg id=2 , global msg id=2 , T on entrance=0 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:483]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=7468, isACK=0 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:441]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed - via branch [z9hG4bK72v4614F91BXr] 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:666]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:348]: run_reqin_callbacks_internal(): trans=0x7fbb0b1d0d40, callback type 1, id 0 entered 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5 calculated: 07ad473ba02a6d3a4f8753a378c102e8 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:324]: t_relay_to(): new INVITE 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:596]: _reply_light(): reply sent out. buf=0x7fbb0f256750: SIP/2.0 100 trying -..., shmem=0x7fbb0b1e75d8: SIP/2.0 100 trying - 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:607]: _reply_light(): finished 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/dns_cache.c:527]: _dns_hash_find(): (_sips._tcp.df7jal23ls0d.invalid(31), 33), h=232 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/resolve.c:967]: get_record(): skipping 1 NS (p=0x561007b83e71, end=0x561007b83ebc) 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/resolve.c:980]: get_record(): parsing 0 ARs (p=0x561007b83ebc, end=0x561007b83ebc) 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/dns_cache.c:761]: dns_cache_mk_bad_entry(): (_sips._tcp.df7jal23ls0d.invalid, 33, 60, 1) 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/dns_cache.c:701]: dns_cache_add(): adding _sips._tcp.df7jal23ls0d.invalid(31) 33 (flags=1) at 232 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/dns_cache.c:527]: _dns_hash_find(): (df7jal23ls0d.invalid(20), 1), h=139 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/resolve.c:967]: get_record(): skipping 1 NS (p=0x561007b83e66, end=0x561007b83eb1) 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/resolve.c:980]: get_record(): parsing 0 ARs (p=0x561007b83eb1, end=0x561007b83eb1) 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/dns_cache.c:761]: dns_cache_mk_bad_entry(): (df7jal23ls0d.invalid, 1, 60, 1) 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/dns_cache.c:701]: dns_cache_add(): adding df7jal23ls0d.invalid(20) 1 (flags=1) at 139 3(19341) ERROR: <core> [core/resolve.c:1698]: sip_hostport2su(): could not resolve hostname: "df7jal23ls0d.invalid" 3(19341) ERROR: tm [ut.h:309]: uri2dst2(): failed to resolve "df7jal23ls0d.invalid" 3(19341) ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1735]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:334]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -478 (-478) 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:352]: t_relay_to(): -478 error reply generation delayed 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=287 a=24 n=sl_reply_error 3(19341) ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:372]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: Unresolvable destination (478/SL) 3(19341) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=289 a=2 n=exit 3(19341) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:353]: receive_msg(): request-route executed in: 12632 usec 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1490]: t_unref(): delayed error reply generation(-478) 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1650]: cleanup_uac_timers(): RETR/FR timers reset 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:596]: _reply_light(): reply sent out. buf=0x7fbb0f2571f0: SIP/2.0 478 Unresolv..., shmem=0x7fbb0b1e7860: SIP/2.0 478 Unresolv 3(19341) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:607]: _reply_light(): finished Looks I missed some thing in message routing, But cannot find what. Please point me how to properly route call for this case.

1 0

$HN(d) null when DNS cache is enabled
by Julien Klingenmeyer 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Hello, I have a small question regarding the internal DNS resolver. Here is my current Kamailio DNS configuration: dns_try_naptr=on use_dns_failover=yes use_dns_cache=yes I need the $HN variable inside my script and it appeared while testing that $HN(d) was null (and consequently $HN(f) was only containing the hostname part of the FQDN). I know /etc/hosts file is bypassed when the DNS cache is activated, so I thought Kamailio was using the domain parameter set in the /etc/resolv.conf file in such cases in order to get the domain. But it was not. I figured out Kamailio correctly retrieves the domain name as long as it is explicitly part of the /etc/hostname file. Is my understanding correct or am I wrong somewhere? What if /etc/hostname does not contain the domain name but hostname only? Thanks! Cheers Julien

1 0

pv_buffer_size config value actually ignored?
by Enrico Bandiera 13 Feb '19

13 Feb '19

Hi, I'm having some strange issues with a somewhat big $avp value, when it reaches a size of about 4K I get this error: 29(47) ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:1452]: pv_printf(): no more space for spec value 29(47) ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:1461]: pv_printf(): buffer overflow – increase the buffer size... In the docs I read that the default pv_buffer_size is 8K, I still tried to enforce it to something bigger and checked the logs to be sure it was set: 0(384) DEBUG: <core> [core/pvapi.c:2062]: pv_init_buffer(): PV print buffer initialized to [40][16384] But still when reaching the 4K size inside the $avp that error comes out, is there any limit I'm not aware of? Thanks, Enrico.

2 1

memory issue with jsonrpc
by Benjamin Roy 12 Feb '19

12 Feb '19

Hi, I'm hoping someone can guide me in the right direction. In kamailio 5.2.1 I'm getting the following memory errors after a while (hours or days) of sending messages with jsonrpc. Restarting kamailio clears them for a while. Any suggestions on what I should change, or how to better identify the issue? 24(6177) ERROR: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:291]: qm_find_free(): qm_find_free(0x7f1cbe6fd000, 5712); Free fragment not found! 24(6177) ERROR: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:425]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7f1cbe6fd000, 5712) called from tm: h_table.c: build_cell(339), module: tm; Free fragment not found! 24(6177) ERROR: tm [uac.c:422]: t_uac_prepare(): short of cell shmem 24(6177) ERROR: pua [send_publish.c:700]: send_publish(): in t_request tm module function 24(6177) ERROR: pua_rpc [pua_rpc.c:280]: pua_rpc_publish_mode(): pua send_publish failed I have these buffer values in the config file tcp_rd_buf_size=65536 pv_buffer_size=32768 and I'm running kamailio with these memory options "-m 1024 -M 16" The jsonrpc message I'm sending look like this { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "pua.publish", "params": [ "sip:172.1.1.3:5060;transport=tcp", "300", "reg", "application/reginfo+xml", ".", ".", ".", ".", "<?xml version='1.0' ?> <reginfo state='partial' version='0' xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:reginfo' xmlns:xsi='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance'> <registration aor='sip:55555@uw.edu' id='a19685' state='active'> <contact duration-registered='906' event='registered' id='c19685--1732979172--1829864152-2' q='1.0' state='active'> <uri>sips:55555@172.1.2.4:62270;transport=tls;avaya-sc-enabled</uri> <elin></elin> </contact> </registration> </reginfo> " ], "id": 1 } Thanks, -Ben

2 3

Programmatically modify SIP Requests/Responses in Kamailio
by Filippos Vasilakis 12 Feb '19

12 Feb '19

Hi, First of all I would like to congratulate and thank everyone who has worked in Kamailio. It looks like an awesome tool. I am starting a side project and I am not very familiar with Kamailio although I know SIP and VoIP in general, so I am more looking for answers that tell me if it's possible or not what I am asking along with some hints on how/where to look. Is there a way to filter/forward/modify(through the headers) incoming SIP requests and Kamailio SIP responses programmatically in Kamailio ? I have seen that you can run embedded code like Ruby, but I wonder if this is for simple things or more complex stuff which probably is in my case since there will be plenty of business logic to figure out what action to take with a SIP request. I have also found the EVAPI that is supposed to be handle events through TCP but not much more info available. So to sum up, is there a way to filter/forward/modify incoming SIP requests and create responses programmatically in Kamailio ? If yes, what's the proper way of doing that ? If no, any idea where I should look for that? Thanks, Filippos

2 1

Kamailio modules that can be used in Lua
by Leonid Fainshtein 12 Feb '19

12 Feb '19

Hello, I am checking a possibility to replace the traditional cfg script with a Lua script. In the app_lua module documentation there is a relatively short list of modules that can be registered to Lua. The modules nathelper, rtpproxy, topoh and many others don't appear in the list. Does it mean that it is not possible to use that modules in Lua? Best regards, Leonid Fainshtein Xorcom Ltd

2 1

Repository for automatic deployment of Kamailio
by Gholamreza Sabery 11 Feb '19

11 Feb '19

Hi, A few years ago, I developed an Ansible repository for automatic deployment of Kamailio. Recently, I added some new features, and now you can deploy the playbooks on Docker containers. I think it is a good starting point for anyone who wants to deploy and use Kamailio for the first time. Link of the repository: https://github.com/ghrst/Kamailio-HA Regards Gholamreza Sabery Tabrizy

2 1

Kamailio TOPOS fail
by Marcos Pytel 11 Feb '19

11 Feb '19

Hi, When I activate the TOPOS function, the Kamailio lb fail. This is the traceback Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51 51 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) backtrace #0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:51 #1 0x00007f66d5aab42a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 #2 0x00007f66d5ae7c00 in __libc_message (do_abort=do_abort@entry=2, fmt=fmt@entry=0x7f66d5bdb305 "*** %s ***: %s terminated\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:175 #3 0x00007f66d5b701f7 in __GI___fortify_fail (msg=msg@entry=0x7f66d5bdb29c "buffer overflow detected") at fortify_fail.c:30 #4 0x00007f66d5b6e330 in __GI___chk_fail () at chk_fail.c:28 #5 0x00007f66b867e097 in memcpy (__len=<optimized out>, __src=<optimized out>, __dest=0x7f66b8892524 <_tps_redis_cbuf+4>) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string3.h:53 #6 tps_redis_load_branch (msg=<optimized out>, md=<optimized out>, sd=0x7ffed3993d30, mode=<optimized out>) at topos_redis_storage.c:744 #7 0x00007f66b88b35c0 in tps_request_received (msg=msg@entry=0x7ffed3995f80, dialog=dialog@entry=1) at tps_msg.c:786 #8 0x00007f66b88b9255 in tps_msg_received (evp=<optimized out>) at topos_mod.c:332 #9 0x000055e1dc07da88 in sr_event_exec (type=<optimized out>, evp=<optimized out>) at core/events.c:211 #10 0x000055e1dc0415f5 in receive_msg ( buf=buf@entry=0x55e1dc511d40 <buf> "BYE sip:atpsh-5c4b0f6e-25b2-9@10.10.10.2 SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK898122669\r\nFrom: <sip:2972426338@10.10.10.1>;tag=3296734298\r\nTo: <sip:414533@10.10.10.2>;tag=03D2CCF0-5"..., len=381, rcv_info=rcv_info@entry=0x7ffed3996980) at core/receive.c:157 #11 0x000055e1dbf5e6e3 in udp_rcv_loop () at core/udp_server.c:554 #12 0x000055e1dbef3a9f in main_loop () at main.c:1619 #13 0x000055e1dbeea8cb in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7ffed3996f38) at main.c:2638 This is a Kamailio error? I can fix it? Thanks. Marcos.

4 6

reg_fetch_contacts and t_relay usage
by Володимир Іванець 11 Feb '19

11 Feb '19

Hello! I'm using *reg_fetch_contacts* function to get information about all contacts. This allows to define which contacts should receive the call. My question is if it's possible to choose only one contact before *t_relay* is called? Or *reg_fetch_contacts* call and verification should be done after *t_relay* in all branches and those which are not needed should be stopped? Thanks a lot!

2 2

rtpengine not listening on specified port range
by Narayan P 11 Feb '19

11 Feb '19

Hello, I am starting the rtpengine through this command,but rtpengine is not listening on the specified port range.It is listening on some other port outside of this.Here first IP is private IP and the second IP is public one.So issue is with audio.Can you please let me know what exactly I am missing. rtpengine --interface=172.20.xx.xxx\!34.209.1.xx -f -m 16384 -M 16884 -E --listen-ng=127.0.0.1:22222 & Any suggestion will be highly appreciated. Thanks, Narayan NP

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users