- sr-users - kamailio.org

How to set "set_dialog_profile" value for Leg-a and leg-b.
by satyaprakash ch 09 May '24

09 May '24

Hi, We are using kamailio and freeswitch, So when we make a call from A to B the call is going via "kamailio -> freeswitch" and "freeswitch -> kamailio". Please suggest me how i can set "set_dialog_profile" for both legs with unique value in kamailio config file. Thanks.

1 0

Is there any way to modify the Refer-To header username?
by Shah Hussain Khattak 09 May '24

09 May '24

Hello Experts, I wanted to check, is there any way to modify the username part of the Refer-To header in Kamailio? For example, I am getting the following header: REFER-TO: <sip:sip.abc.domain.com:5061;transport=tls; ..... ; .... ; ...> the username part is missing. Can I add a username inside it? For example, change it to REFER-TO: <sip:123@sip.abc.domain.com:5061;transport=tls; ..... ; .... ; ...> REFER-TO: <sip:test-kam@sip.abc.domain.com:5061;transport=tls; ..... ; .... ; ...> I could not find any solution in the mailing list, the only way was to remove the header and then re-add it. Thank you! Regards, Shah Hussain

2 2

rtpengine timestamp jumps
by Jeff Brower 09 May '24

09 May '24

Hi rtpengine experts, We have some customers processing long multi-party call pcaps using mediaMin who are reporting large amounts of packets with timestamp jumps but no packet loss (for instance 10% of packets over a 1 hr 45 min call). For example, in the Wireshark excerpt shown below, packets 6 and 8 sent by rtpengine show a timestamp increment of 640, but sequence number increment of 1: In the mediaMin output packet log we typically see sections similar to: : : Seq num 98584 timestamp = 3902252372, rtp pyld len = 33 media-R Seq num 98585 timestamp = 3902252692, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98586 timestamp = 3902253012, rtp pyld len = 33 media-R Seq num 98587 timestamp = 3902253332, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98588 timestamp = 3902253652, rtp pyld len = 33 media-R Seq num 98589 timestamp = 3902253972, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98590 timestamp = 3902254292, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98591 timestamp = 3902254612, rtp pyld len = 33 media-R Seq num 98592 timestamp = 3902254932, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98593 timestamp = 3902255252, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98594 timestamp = 3902255572, rtp pyld len = 33 media-R Seq num 98595 timestamp = 3902255892, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98596 timestamp = 3902256212, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98597 timestamp = 3902256532, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98598 timestamp = 3902256852, rtp pyld len = 33 media-R Seq num 98599 timestamp = 3902257172, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98600 timestamp = 3902257492, rtp pyld len = 33 media-R Seq num 98601 timestamp = 3902257812, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98602 timestamp = 3902258132, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98603 timestamp = 3902258452, rtp pyld len = 33 media Seq num 98604 timestamp = 3902258772, rtp pyld len = 33 media-R Seq num 98605 timestamp = 3902259092, rtp pyld len = 33 media : : where media-R packets are timestamp gap repairs (i.e. frame loss concealment). The behavior tends to be bursty, but once it gets going it goes for a while and seems relatively consistent. Is this expected behavior for rtpengine ? If so is rptengine in turn dealing with some type of "slow packet rate" issue from a remote sender ? Thanks, Jeff

1 0

Kamailio v5.7.5 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 May '24

08 May '24

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.7.5 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.7, that includes fixes since the release of v5.7.4. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.7.x. Deployments running previous v5.7.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.7.5. For more details about version 5.7.5 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2024/05/kamailio-v5-7-5-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Note that 5.7.x is currently the previous stable release series, the latest is 5.8.x and v5.8.1 was released on April 3, 2024. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com

1 0

Releasing v5.7.5
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 May '24

08 May '24

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.7.5 (out of branch 5.7) on Wednesday, May 8, 2024. If anyone is aware of issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in order to have a better chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.com

1 1

sql_query fails from event_route
by Juha Heinanen 07 May '24

07 May '24

I noticed that sql_query does not (anymore) work when called from event route: event_route [tcp:closed] { # Handle TCP connection close # Delete possible leftover registration if ($conid) sql_query("sip_proxy_cache", "DELETE FROM location WHERE server_id=0 AND connection_id=$conid", "result"); } The query produces errors: 2024-05-07T11:30:14.785915+03:00 siika /usr/bin/sip-proxy[2848078]: CRITICAL: sqlops [sqlops.c:213]: sql_check_connection(): no database handle with reconnect disabled 2024-05-07T11:30:14.785978+03:00 siika /usr/bin/sip-proxy[2848078]: ERROR: sqlops [sqlops.c:232]: sql_query(): invalid connection to database 2024-05-07T11:30:14.786013+03:00 siika /usr/bin/sip-proxy[2848078]: ERROR: sqlops [sqlops.c:237]: sql_query(): with query [DELETE FROM location WHERE server_id=0 AND connection_id=7] I added the last debug message in order to find out where the error comes from. The same query works fine when executed from regular route. Any ideas why the query fails from event_route? -- Juha

2 3

How to use environment variable
by Pavan Kumar 07 May '24

07 May '24

Hi everyone, I am trying to assign environment variable as follows listen=udp:0.0.0.0:5060 advertise $env(MY_IP):5060 Looks like using the environment variable as above is an invalid configuration. Is there a way to use IP from env var to advertise. Even better, is there a way to use result in a stun query as an advertised address? Thank you, Pavan Kumar

2 3

Retransmission behaviour after ACK
by Sergio Charrua 06 May '24

06 May '24

Hi all! I'm testing some redirect scenarios with Kamailio 5.7.4 and using Astterisk 13 and SIPp for unit testing. The kamailio's script is simple and uses TM, HTTP_ASYNC_MODULE, JSONRPC, JANSSON, RTJSON and XLog modules. Request route is simple: request_route { route(HANDLE_OPTIONS); route(HANDLE_RETRANS); route(HANDLE_CANCEL); route(REQINIT); route(HANDLE_INVITE); } where HANDLE_RETRANS is: route[HANDLE_RETRANS]{ # handle retransmissions xlog("L_INFO","HANDLE_RETRANS - message type is $mt for method $rm"); if (!is_method("ACK")) { if(t_precheck_trans()) { xlog("L_INFO","HANDLE_RETRANS - Precheck Trans"); t_check_trans(); xlog("L_INFO", "HANDLE_RETRANS - Exiting after Retransmission check - method $rm"); exit; } xlog("L_INFO","HANDLE_RETRANS - Check Trans"); t_check_trans(); } } and HANDLE INVITE is: route[HANDLE_INVITE]{ if (is_method("INVITE")) { xlog("L_INFO","MAIN - calling TO_CARRIER"); setflag(FLT_ACC); route(TO_CARRIER); exit; } } The HTTP requests call a REST API returning a JSON object, that is iterated and produces a CONTACT header containing multiple choices using the append_branch() command. The RELAY route is : route[RELAY] { # Sends a 300 Multiple Choices back to the proxy that requested the routing lookup xlog("L_INFO","REPLY_302 - send reply"); send_reply("300", "Multiple Choices"); xlog("L_INFO","REPLY_302 - exit"); exit; } Which returns indeed a Contact header with multiple contact choices. When using Asterisk to originate a call to Kamailio, the SIP call flow is as follows and terminates (SNGrep and TCPDump do not detect anything else): SRC DST INVITE (SDP) ──────────────────────────> 100 trying -- your call is <────────────────────────── 300 Multiple Choices <────────────────────────── ACK ──────────────────────────> However when using SIPp I get some retransmissions after the final ACK. SRC DST INVITE (SDP) ──────────────────────────> 100 trying -- your call is <────────────────────────── 300 Multiple Choices <────────────────────────── ACK ──────────────────────────> 300 Multiple Choices <<<──────────────────────── 300 Multiple Choices <<<──────────────────────── 300 Multiple Choices <<<──────────────────────── SIPp scenario is : <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?> <!DOCTYPE scenario SYSTEM "sipp.dtd"> <scenario name="Basic Sipstone UAC">   <send retrans="500" start_rtd="true" rrs="true"> <![CDATA[ INVITE sip:[call_number]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=[branch] Max-Forwards: 70 From: sipp <sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;tag=[call_number] To: <sip:[call_number]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]> Contact: sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port];transport=[transport]> Call-ID: [call_id] CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: SIPp Supported: replaces, timer Content-Type: application/sdp Subject: Performance Test Session-Expires: 3600;refresher=uas Content-Length: [len] v=0 o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP[local_ip_type] [local_ip] s=SIPp c=IN IP[media_ip_type] [media_ip] t=0 0 m=audio [media_port] RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 ]]> </send> <recv response="100" rss="true"> </recv> <recv response="300" rtd="true" rss="true"> <action> <ereg regexp="\<([a-zA-Z0-9@.=;]+)[^>]+" search_in="hdr" header="Contact: " assign_to="1"/> <log message="INFO: 300 Contact Header: [$1]" /> <exec command="echo [$1] >> ./300_ContactHeader.txt" /> </action> <action> <ereg regexp="sip:.*@([0-9A-Za-z\.]+):([0-9]+);transport=([A-Z]+)" search_in="hdr" header="Contact:" check_it="true" assign_to="dummy,host,port,transport" /> </action> </recv>   <send rrs="true"> <![CDATA[ ACK sip:[call_number]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/[transport] [local_ip]:[local_port];branch=[branch] Max-Forwards: 70 From: <sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]>;tag=[call_number] To: <sip:[call_number]@[remote_ip]:[remote_port]>[peer_tag_param] Contact: <sip:sipp@[local_ip]:[local_port]> Call-ID: [call_id] CSeq: 102 ACK User-Agent: SIPp Content-Length: 0 ]]> </send>   </scenario> The question is : is there anything wrong with my kamailio script? or with SIPp scenario? why does kamailio have different behaviours between Asterisk and SIPp? Any option to disable retransmissions on Kamailio ? (using UDP) Thanks in advance, *Sérgio Charrua*

2 3

topos with mask_callid
by Marrold 05 May '24

05 May '24

Hi all, I am using Kamailio 5.8.1 on a Debian 12 machine with topos and topoh hiding the topology. I have observed with modparam("topos", "mask_callid", 1), in-dialog requests are relayed with the incorrect caller-id. In the scenario, A calls B. The call is set up and the call-id for the B-Leg is successfully masked. Then, when A sends a BYE, the BYE is incorrectly relayed to B with the call-id of the A leg, and B replies with a 481 If I disable masking the call-id, or disable topos/topoh entirely, everything looks and works as it should. I have tested with 5.7.4 and the behaviour is the same. Does anyone have any ideas for where I should start looking? Thanks Matthew

1 0

Re: IMS SCSCF redundancy
by Oleg Belousov 03 May '24

03 May '24

Hi. I have a question re: IMS SCSCF redundancy.:There are several SCSCF instances, registration happens via SCSCF1, it goes down after that. UE make MO call.. PCSCF resolves the common SCSCF fqdn and sends an invite to available SCSCF2 which does not have UE profile as well as AS address (which is received during registration SAR/SAA in iFC). There are 2 options here, either to release the call (as per 3gpp spec upon specific release code, eg 408/503 UE should perform re-registration - not happen in our case unfortunately), or to send request for iFC (suspend the call, fire SAR, receive SAA, check available services, etc) and upon success continue the call (to AS first)/ Lke IMS Registrar SCSCF save function, but for the invite. To continue the call without interaction with AS is not a good idea.. Any advice or workaround on how to achieve desired SCSCF redundancy ? -- obelousov.tel

1 0

http_async_client and sl_send_reply()
by Masud Muborakshohi 02 May '24

02 May '24

Hello! I have a problem when sending a response sl_send_reply("415", "The other party does not support video calling!"); in route[HTTP_REPLY]. When I make a request using http_async_query() to send a push notification to a mobile device, I need to process the response from the push server and respond with a SIP message to the client. Before sending the request I do $http_req(suspend) = 0; What am I doing wrong? Why are $fU and $ru equal to null ? #processing HTTP responses route[HTTP_REPLY] { if ($http_ok && $http_rs == 200) { xlog("L_INFO", "route[HTTP_REPLY]: status $http_rs\n"); xlog("L_INFO", "route[HTTP_REPLY]: body $http_rb\n"); } else if($http_rs == 415 || $http_rs == "415") { xlog("L_ERR", "route[HTTP_REPLY]: caller: $fU phone: $ru error: $http_err)\n"); send_reply("415", "The other party does not support video calling!"); } else { xlog("L_ALERT", "route[HTTP_REPLY]: error $http_err)\n"); } #exit; }

3 5

No ACK from Kamailio
by Arseniy Moskvich 02 May '24

02 May '24

Hi everyone. We are new to Kamailio and using Kamailio 5.8 with FreeSwitch. We have the issue with the incoming call from our provider. They are dropping after 30 seconds. The client doesn't receive ACK from Kamailio. But FreeSwitch sends ACK to Kamailio. The outbound call is working fine. At the moment flow is our provider -> FreeSwitch -> Kamailio -> our web client. Could someone give us some directions please? Please find attached Kemi.py. Thank you so much in advance

2 2

Kamailio works but voice is not present during the calls!
by christian.marinelli＠hotmail.it 02 May '24

02 May '24

Hi all, i have a problem with my Kamailio SIP Server. I set up a Kamailio SIP server in a virtual machine on a private network and i connect to this with a WireGuard VPN. The problem is that i can connect to the SIP server throught different clients and users and i can call the other users, the devices ring and i can answer to the calls but unfortunatly there is no audio during the call :( I can't understand why, it seems all si OK, a year ago i set up another SIP server with the same configuration and all works correctly with it. Can anyone help me to understand why? I can copy and paste here all the config files if you need it. Thank you so much in advance Christian

8 29

AEM Implementation Services,
by surekhatech.seo＠gmail.com 02 May '24

02 May '24

As an Official Adobe Bronze Solution Partner, we specialize in AEM development services, consulting, implementation, migration, and cloud services for your business.

1 0

Question: if SIP Timer L and Timer M from RFC6026 has been defined at Kamailio
by jennifer yang 02 May '24

02 May '24

Hello Can anyone help answer these questions: - if SIP Timer L and Timer M from RFC6026 has been defined at Kamailio (version v5.5.x)? Timer L: Wait time for accepted INVITE request retransmits Timer M: Wait time for retransmission of 2xx to INVITE or additional 2xx from other branches of a forked INVITE - if no specific Timer defined, which timer will be used instead? thanks br jenni

1 0

Issue with serial call forking to same destination
by Mathias 30 Apr '24

30 Apr '24

Hi I've an issue with serial call forking and I hope somebody can help me... What I'm trying to reach: We are using Kamailio in a dynamic network with multiple nodes. The dialplan is implemented using the KEMI interface. The call routing is completely dynamic. At the moment, we are having call groups, which may contain 1 or more recipients. If the number of this call group is called, Kamailio is doing a parallel forking to all group participants. Now I'm trying to extend the feature, that if nobody hooks up, the call is forwarded to another number. This has been implemented with serial forking. So the dialplan adds branches for all call group members with a q value of 1 and the last branch is the failover number with a lower q value. The branching and failure route works fine. The problem: * I have a call group (G Bob 900101), with one participant (Bob 200102). * The group has a fail over number (if Bob doesn't hook up), which points again to Bob. I know that this use case doesn't make much sense, but it has been simplified to show the problem. The failover number can be anything also another call group which may contain one or more recipients from the first group again. * Alice (200101) calls the call group * The first node (10.0.1.1/10.64.0.1) receives the call and forks it to branch 1 Bob (202102) with q value 1.0 and to a second branch Bob (202102) with q value 0.5. fr_timer is set to 10s * The call is forwarded to node 2 (10.0.2.1/10.64.0.2), where Bob is registered. * The call is forwarded to Bobs device (Grandstream GXV3350) and the phone is ringing. * After 10s, the first node detects the 408 Request Timeout and switches to the second branch * The invite is sent to node 2 and Bobs device again. * Node 1 also sends a CANCEL to node 2 and Bobs device for the first branch. * The call in Bobs device is terminated * Now the problem, the device does not react to the second INVITE. And after the fr_inv_timer expires, the call is terminated with a 408 Request Timeout. I can see that the second INVITE contains another branch ID <ID>.1 compared to the first INVITE, which had <ID>.0. The CANCEL is also sent with <ID>.0. I've also tried with a Cisco 8861 3PCC and it doesn't work either. Compared to the Grandstream, the Cisco device returns an error 500 upon the second INVITE. Since both devices do not accept what I'm trying, I guess I'm doing something wrong... At the moment I'm a bit lost, what the problem could be. Does somebody have an idea what it is and how I could solve it? Following two SIP dumps from node 1 and node 2: Node 1: |Time | 10.0.1.128 | 10.64.0.1 | | | | 10.0.1.1 | | 10.0.2.1 | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.792784| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | | |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> Call-ID:2102072978-5060-296@BA.A.B.BCI CSeq:2950 | |(47276) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.793060| 407 Proxy Authentica | | |SIP Status 407 Proxy Authentication Required | |(47276) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.796613| ACK | | | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2950 | |(47276) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.799045| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | | |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> Call-ID:2102072978-5060-296@BA.A.B.BCI CSeq:2951 | |(47276) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.836471| 100 trying -- your c | | |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | |(47276) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.865219| | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.036334| | | 100 trying -- your c |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.084421| | | 180 Ringing |SIP Status 180 Ringing | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.096834| 180 Ringing | | |SIP Status 180 Ringing | |(47276) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.099644| | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.100099| | | CANCEL | |SIP CANCEL From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.259375| | | 100 trying -- your c |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.274841| | | 200 canceling |SIP Status 200 canceling | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.296942| | | 487 Request Terminat |SIP Status 487 Request Terminated | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.298630| | | ACK | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.281602| | | 408 Request Timeout |SIP Status 408 Request Timeout | | | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.283433| | | ACK | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5061) | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.307343| 408 Request Timeout | | |SIP Status 408 Request Timeout | |(47276) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.309097| ACK | | | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:<sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | |(47276) ------------------> (5061) | | | Node 2: |Time | 10.64.0.1 | 10.64.0.2 | | | | 10.0.2.1 | | 10.0.2.128 | |2024-01-31 14:17:07.869305| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | | |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> Call-ID:2102072978-5060-296@BA.A.B.BCI CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.036009| 100 trying -- your c | | |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.050848| | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.054357| | 100 Trying| | |SIP Status 100 Trying | | |(5061) <-------------------------------------- (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.075422| | 180 Ringing | |SIP Status 180 Ringing | | |(5061) <-------------------------------------- (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:08.083887| 180 Ringing | | |SIP Status 180 Ringing | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.100359| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | | |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> Call-ID:2102072978-5060-296@BA.A.B.BCI CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.258947| 100 trying -- your c | | |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.273819| | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.274460| CANCEL | | | |SIP Request CANCEL CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.274550| | | CANCEL | |SIP CANCEL From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.274615| 200 canceling | | |SIP Status 200 canceling | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.277438| | 200 OK | | |SIP Status 200 OK | | |(5061) <-------------------------------------- (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.279335| | 487 Request Terminated | |SIP Status 487 Request Terminated | | |(5061) <-------------------------------------- (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.280785| | | ACK | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | | | |(5061) ------------------> (5060) | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.296312| 487 Request Terminat | | |SIP Status 487 Request Terminated | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:18.298900| ACK | | | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.280965| 408 Request Timeout | | |SIP Status 408 Request Timeout | |(5061) <------------------ (5061) | | | |2024-01-31 14:17:20.283730| ACK | | | |SIP ACK From: "Alice" < sips:200101@10.0.1.1:5061> To:"Bob" <sips:900101@10.0.1.1:5061> CSeq:2951 | |(54454) ------------------> (5061) | | | At the moment, I'm using Kamailio 5.5.4, but I also did a short try with a newer version (I guess it was 5.7.4). Both versions showed the same issue. Best regards Mathias

1 0

Sudden TCP errors and shared memory spikes
by David Cunningham 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hello, We have a production Kamailio 5.2.7 server which has suddenly started reporting spikes in the shared memory use. When looking into this, we noticed that at the same time as the memory spikes Kamailio also logs a huge amount of errors like the following. Can anyone help with an explanation for what's going on? The xx.xx.52.202 address is the Kamailio server itself. We record historical numbers of network connections for the server overall, and that doesn't show any increase in the number of TCP connections, either at the time of the spikes or as a general trend. Thanks in advance! Apr 26 09:23:16 vpbx11 /sbin/kamailio[44272]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2703]: tcpconn_1st_send(): connect xx.xx.52.202:42726 failed (RST) Connection refused Apr 26 09:23:16 vpbx11 /sbin/kamailio[44272]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2711]: tcpconn_1st_send(): xx.xx.52.202:42726: connect & send for 0x14bbf44c9f40 failed: Connection refused (111) Apr 26 09:23:16 vpbx11 /sbin/kamailio[44272]: ERROR: tm [../../core/forward.h:293]: msg_send_buffer(): tcp_send failed Apr 26 09:23:16 vpbx11 /sbin/kamailio[44272]: WARNING: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1149]: tcp_do_connect(): xx.xx.52.202:42726: could not find corresponding listening socket for xx.xx.52.202, using default... -- David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited http://voisonics.com/ USA: +1 213 221 1092 New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782

2 2

tls_threads_mode and app_python3 module
by Ihor Olkhovskyi 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hello, Just to confirm, as I quickly checked into a code of 5.8.x branch, there were no modification on app_python3 module to comply with tls_threads_mode mechanism? Asking this beforehand posting a bug, that if using a quite simple script into module, with tls_threads_mode = 2 Kamailio just hangs at the start and become unresponsive. And by simple I mean something like this class PyKamailio: def __init__(self): self.test = 1 def child_init(self, rank): """Executed by app_python module when a new worker process (child) is initialized by Kamailio.""" return 1 def mod_init(): """ Executed by app_python module when it is initialized by Kamailio.""" return PyKamailio() with tls_threads_mode = 1 and 3 it loads, but if add some HTTPS calls inside the script (even not the calls, but importing the methods, that are making calls with import), it just start failing on TLS load, despite that on packets processed (OPTIONS) no python_exec() is called, just from the fact of having HTTPS calls into Python script. -- Best regards, Ihor (Igor)

1 1

RTP Engine with Kamailio hold issue
by Vishal Pai 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hello Everyone I am using kamailio with RTP engine for wss to udp to connect my asterisk server. It all works well like wss to UDP registration via kamailio to asterisk. Here I am facing an issue with call hold i.e if I hold the call from B leg it gets disconnected. Any advice why it get failed and hangups Thanks

1 0

Error by installing new Rel. 5.8
by lm.eng＠live.com 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hello,, I am using this docker file for installaing kamailio. I wana use it with open5gs for trynig VoNR , I used before it for VoLTE it works but right now I have this error in installation process. icscf | 0(34) ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:527]: ksr_locate_module(): could not find module <maxfwd> in </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/ lib64/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/:/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/ modules> icscf | 0(34) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:4008]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio_icscf/kamailio_icscf.cfg, line 94, colu mn 12-19: failed to load module scscf | 0(38) ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:527]: ksr_locate_module(): could not find module <maxfwd> in </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/ lib64/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/:/usr/local/lib64/kamailio/ and there is docker file that Im using: FROM ubuntu:focal ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive # Install updates and dependencies RUN apt-get update && \ apt-get -y install mysql-server tcpdump screen tmux ntp ntpdate git-core dkms \ gcc flex bison libmysqlclient-dev make libssl-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev \ libxml2-dev libpcre2-dev bash-completion g++ autoconf libmnl-dev \ libsctp-dev libradcli-dev libradcli4 libjson-c-dev pkg-config iproute2 net-tools \ iputils-ping # Fetch Kamailio code (branch 5.3) RUN mkdir -p /usr/local/src/ && cd /usr/local/src/ && \ git clone https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio && \ cd kamailio && git checkout 5.8 # Build and Install Kamailio RUN cd /usr/local/src/kamailio && make cfg COPY modules.lst /usr/local/src/kamailio/src RUN cd /usr/local/src/kamailio && \ make -j`nproc` Q=0 all | tee make_all.txt && \ make install | tee make_install.txt && \ ldconfig COPY kamailio_init.sh / CMD /kamailio_init.sh

2 1

Understanding NAT Flags
by Benoit Panizzon 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hi Gang Somehow I don't get my head around NAT Flags and the nathelper module https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.7.x/modules/nathelper.html In the examples I found, there is: FLT_NATS and FLB_NATB If I got it right, FLB_NATB is a branch flag, which shall indicate that the device is 'B'ehind NAT, right? It is being set, when FLT_NATS is set: if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } But when should FLT_NATS be set and what is it's meaning? The examples I found don't tell me this. Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

3 4

Outbound Proxy/Forwarder
by Blake Ivey 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hi everyone, New user who is trying to make an outbound proxy to route a lot of freepbx boxes for outbound calls. I got this setup and working using dsiprouter. Calls come in from freepbx trunk using outbound proxy, authenticated using IP auth, and then gets signed with our stirshaken cert, then routes out to our carriers. Interested in using plain kamailio. Got everything compiled and libstirshaken compiled. Just wanted to see if someone could point me in the right direction for the cfg file. I assume I would match how I have it in dsiprouter. That config has a lot of things I'm not using and having a hard time deciphering it. My thoughts on what I need: MySQL database. Have a table for ip auth, a table for voice carriers, and a table for 911 carriers. Invite comes in, it checks ip auth table and responds with 403 if it's not on the list. If it is, proceed to stir shaken signing, and then route the call? I assume I will need to have some logic to tell voice calls and emergency calls. I got plain old routing/forwarding working and now want to focus on locking it down. Any thoughts, examples configs, anything would be awesome. I am hoping to get this working and then having a primary/standby or even load balancing them but im in the very early stages of trying to get my head around Kamailio. Thanks for any insights!

2 1

How to identify the instances of a looping call (including all replies and on all transactions)
by Benoit Panizzon 29 Apr '24

29 Apr '24

Hi List I have stumbled over this challenge: I have a kamailio server without dialog module. Only tmx module, acting as registrar / rtpengine host. If the call is routed over that server once, this works fine. If the call is routed more than once (call from one location to another on same registrar, call forwarding) then to correctly work, I would need to engage rtpengine in a way to tell rtpengine to handle both call legs separately. By default, rtpengine identifies one call by Call-ID,FromTag,ToTag so it considers all invocations to target one instance and on the 2nd invocations it replaces the source rtp ip by it's own ip killing audio. Using 'loop-protect' to prevent the 2nd invocation 'sort-of' works, but not cleanly if I use different 'private' ip ranges on my voice core and IC network to which CPE should not talk. It is possible to pass a custom Call-ID to rtpengine. So this is how I am considering finding a solution. When passing the call-id to rtpengine I could append a leg identifier to that call-id. like $avp(rtp-callid) = $ci + $var(leg-id) How could I reliably generate this leg-id / tell the legs apart? Consider this situation: leg 1 leg 2 CPE-A => Kam-Reg => Routing Core => Kam-Reg => CPE-B Also I wonder if I can use an AVP at all? From Kamailio's Point of view, the first invite being routed twice could be the same transaction with same shared AVP, right? Is there a way to pass some information via flags appended route-header? Or maybe use the count of via or route header to tell the legs apart? Any ideas very appreciated. Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 0

Using SQLite in wal mode with synchronous=normal
by Tim Anderson 28 Apr '24

28 Apr '24

Hi, I see the documentation for the sqlite module includes a parameter to set the journal_mode to wal, but I don't see any way to set synchronous=normal. Is there a way to run arbitrary PRAGMA statements upon opening the file or would I have to run it before each query?

1 0

SDP getting modified.
by Pavan Kumar 28 Apr '24

28 Apr '24

Hi everyone, Here is my setup SIP Client (MacBook) <=> Kamailio (AWS) <=> Freeswitch (AWS) When I initiate a call from Client, audio won't be sent out, but the client can receive audio. (When the client receives the call everything works fine). I started to trace the SIP message using tdpdump. And here is an interesting thing. Kamailio sends the following SDP message while sending 200 OK v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1714278184 1714278185 IN IP4 *<freeswitch-ip-address>* s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 *<freeswitch-ip-address>* t=0 0 m=audio 27644 RTP/AVP 120 101 a=rtpmap:120 opus/48000/2 a=fmtp:120 useinbandfec=1 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 But on my computer where SIP client is running I receive following message v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1714278184 1714278185 IN IP4 *<kamailio-ip-address>* s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 *<kamailio-ip-address>* t=0 0 m=audio 27644 RTP/AVP 120 101 a=rtpmap:120 opus/48000/2 a=fmtp:120 useinbandfec=1 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 Somehow, somewhere, somebody is modifying the IP address in the SDP message, hence the SIP client is sending audio to "Kamailio" instead of "Freeswitch" server. My initial guess was my router might be modifying it. After checking the router settings I found SIP ALG is enabled. I disabled it, yet no use. I changed my internet connection to a different provider and things started working. SDP is not getting modified. Have you ever faced such an issue where someone/something is modifying the SDP messages. How did you debug to figure out which component was modifying it? And common fixes for such weird situations? Thanks and Regards, Pavan Kumar

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users