- sr-users - kamailio.org

Specify alternative OpenSSL engine for Kamailio
by Joel Serrano | VOZELIA 25 Jun '16

25 Jun '16

Hi, This is a similar question on a previous thread: "[SR-Users] Compiling kamailio with custom openssl" Is it possible to specify a different OpenSSL engine for kamailio to use? For example: On nginx you have the config param: ssl_engine <engine> On apache you have the config param: SSLCryptoDevice <engine> Is there anything similar on Kamailio? We are using debian 8 with openssl-1.0.1t and these are the available engines: root@debian:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openssl-1.0.0/engines# ls -l total 404 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19512 Jun 21 11:07 lib4758cca.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19784 Jun 21 11:07 libaep.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15576 Jun 21 11:07 libatalla.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6104 Jun 21 11:07 libcapi.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24232 Jun 21 11:07 libchil.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19864 Jun 21 11:07 libcswift.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6104 Jun 21 11:07 libgmp.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 93304 Jun 21 11:07 libgost.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15432 Jun 21 11:07 libnuron.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6104 Jun 21 11:07 libpadlock.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 24096 Jun 21 11:07 libsureware.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 19784 Jun 21 11:07 libubsec.so root@debian:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openssl-1.0.0/engines# The reason is we have another server with a Cavium SSL card, which provides a dynamic engine: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 127968 Jun 23 15:18 libcavium.so If it is not possible via config parameter, is there a way to specify the openssl engine to use before compiling? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Joel.

2 2

Count number of headers of type
by Joel Serrano | VOZELIA 25 Jun '16

25 Jun '16

Hi, It there an easy way to count the number of existing headers of certain type? For example: - How many 'via' headers: $hdrcount(Via) ? - How many 'diversion' headers: $hdrcount(Diversion) ? The $hdrcount is an example, just wondering if there is an easy way to get the number. Thanks. Best regards, Joel.

2 2

t_on_failure route not being called
by Colin Morelli 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

Hey all, I'm using a combination of http_async_client and rtjson to query my API and retrieve a JSON target route set for an incoming SIP request that Kamailio will forward to. The HTTP portion of it works great. I'm able to hit my API and get back a JSON document. Additionally, the rtjson parsing appears to work, because the request is hitting my freeswitch instance. However, FS is responding with a 503 (I'm intentionally doing this for testing), and Kamailio isn't calling my t_on_failure route. I've pasted the relevant portion of my config below - would be great if anyone has any insights. tl;dr: the "REROUTE" route section below isn't being reached even when FS responds with a 503. Best, Colin route[ROUTING_REPLY] { if $http_ok && $http_rs == 200 { xlog("L_INFO", "$ci|log|loaded target route set from document $http_rb\n"); rtjson_init_routes("$http_rb"); rtjson_push_routes(); xlog("L_INFO", "$ci|log|attempting to relay request towards $du\n"); t_on_failure("REROUTE"); t_set_fr(0, 1000); t_relay(); } else { send_reply("480", "Temporarily Unavailable"); } } route[REROUTE] { xlog("L_WARN", "$ci|log|relay to destination $du failed, checking next route\n"); if (rtjson_next_route()) { xlog("L_INFO", "$ci|log|additional route found, directing request to $du\n"); t_on_failure("REROUTE"); t_set_fr(0, 1000); t_relay(); } else { xlog("L_WARN", "$ci|log|route list exhausted, failing request\n"); send_reply("480", "Temporarily Unavailable"); exit; } }

1 1

S-CSCF (kamailio) crashes after deregistration of client
by Christoph Valentin 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

4 12

Kamailio behind ELB AWS
by yann christophe 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

Hello Everyone, I would like to know, if i can use ELB and route53 behind some Kamailio servers for the high availibility ? I use Kamailio behind Freeswitch. I would like deploy these servers on AWS. What do you suggest me for the high availibility on AWS with Kamailio. Thanks Best regards Yann

2 1

rtpengine installation delete ethernet interface on Centos
by Yasin CANER 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

1 0

How to understad that user is de-registrating
by Alexandru Covalschi 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

Hello list, I need to send to an external API events when user is registrated and de-registrated. As far as I understand standart behaviour is as follows: If user is not registered, he sends REGISTER and he is registrated (I can catch that because I make the auth). If user is registered and sends REGISTER he is de-register. (Please correct me if I'm wrong.) How can I catch that? Can I use event_route[usrloc:contact-expired]? Thanks in advance! -- Alexandru Covalschi ABRISS-Solutions VoIP engineer and system administrator tel: +37367398493 web: http://abriss.solutions/ <http://abs-telecom.com/>

3 4

uacreg flags field not changing
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

Hi. Im using kamailio 4.4.1 kamailio -v flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 99e1c3 compiled on 13:34:38 Jun 14 2016 with gcc 4.9.2 I using uacreg table for register trunks and want to know their status For now i see status onlu from kamcmd uac.reg_dump/info But if i trying to take flags from uacreg table (flags field) it always 0.

1 0

Compiling kamailio with custom openssl
by Cibin Paul 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

Hi, Can any one guide me to compile kamailio with custom openssl path please. Thanks & Regards Cibin

2 12

Dialog timeout before answer
by Alex Balashov 24 Jun '16

24 Jun '16

Hi, Will the dialog timeout - and specifically, $dlg_ctx(timeout_bye) - also apply to dialogs which have not yet been established? If so, does that mean the dialog module will send a CANCEL instead for a dialog in an early/progress state? -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

2 1

kamailio + fax "other fax not responding"
by Mx R 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

Hi there, We use kamailio 4.3.3. And we have one problem with the fax. We send and receive from and to our network, the fax does not work. Fax reports "other fax not responding". When we send through our network to another operator they receive fax. What could be wrong?

2 5

Kamailio 4.3.3 and HUAWEI HG8245. Port 1 call port 2. 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist. Warning: 399 No Dialog match.
by Mx R 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

Hi there. In our network we used several ONT Huawei models. But with one model HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245 / V1R003C00S205 we have the following problem. When connecting to this device in the POTS ports of the two phones. From the first port we can not call to the second and from the second port can not call to the first port. On the other ONT Huawei devices, there is no such problem. Earlier we had set OpenSIP and this device did not have a problem. The problem is likely in the configuration because it works at the default settings. kamailio -v Version: kamailio 4.3.3 (x86_64/linux) f69971 /var/log/kamailio May 17 10:53:21 kamailio /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[17875]: INFO: <script>: Callee '123456' is local - M=INVITE RURI=sip:123456@10.10.10.200 F= sip:654321@10.10.10.200 T=sip:123456@10.10.10.200 IP=10.14.197.13 5 ID=lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 May 17 10:53:21 kamailio /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[17875]: INFO: <script>: Call control: dst user '123456' currently has [0/2] active calls - M=INVITE RURI=sip:123456@10.10.10.200 F=sip:654321@10.10.10.200 T=si p:123456@10.10.10.200 IP=10.10.10.100 ID= lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 May 17 10:53:21 kamailio /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[17875]: INFO: <script>: Normalize source: sip:654321@10.10.10.200 -> sip:654321@10.10.10.200 May 17 10:53:21 kamailio /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[17875]: INFO: <script>: Request leaving server - M=INVITE RURI=sip:123456@10.10.10.100:5060;transport=udp F=sip:654321@10.10.10.200 T=sip:123456@178.168.4. 37 IP=10.10.10.100 ID=lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 May 17 10:53:22 kamailio /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[17873]: INFO: <script>: Reply - S=100 D=Trying F=sip:654321@10.10.10.200 T=sip:123456@10.10.10.200 IP=10.10.10.100 ID=lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.1 4.197.135 May 17 10:53:22 kamailio /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[17861]: INFO: <script>: Reply - S=481 D=Call/Transaction Does Not Exist F=sip:654321@10.10.10.200 T= sip:123456@10.10.10.200 IP=10.10.10.100 ID= lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 sngrep 2016/05/17 10:53:21.514702 10.10.10.100:5060 -> 10.10.10.200:5060 INVITE sip:123456@10.10.10.200 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.100:5060;branch=z9hG4bKz4j0izm0i8jcn2pmlkm4c24cz Route: <sip:10.10.10.200:5060;transport=udp;lr> Call-ID: lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 From: <sip:654321@10.10.10.200>;tag=pk4nzz3j To: <sip:123456@10.10.10.200> CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:654321@10.10.10.100:5060;transport=udp> Supported: 100rel,replaces,timer,privacy,in-dialog Session-Expires: 1800 Accept: application/sdp,application/simservs+xml Min-SE: 90 Accept-Encoding: identity Accept-Language: en Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,REGISTER,INFO,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,UPDATE,MESSAGE,REFER Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245/V1R003C00S205 Session-ID: 20zlkckj1kz4ll1i1ic2pl1csk80kli1 Content-Length: 318 Content-Type: application/sdp 2016/05/17 10:53:21.590008 10.10.10.100:5060 -> 10.10.10.200:5060 INVITE sip:123456@10.10.10.200 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.100:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0lz4ll1ikm1k02p20lz4ll1il Route: <sip:10.10.10.200:5060;transport=udp;lr> Call-ID: lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 From: <sip:654321@10.10.10.200>;tag=pk4nzz3j To: <sip:123456@10.10.10.200> CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:654321@10.10.10.100:5060;transport=udp> Supported: 100rel,replaces,timer,privacy,in-dialog Session-Expires: 1800 Accept: application/sdp,application/simservs+xml Min-SE: 90 Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="654321",realm="10.10.10.200",nonce="VzrPHVc6zfEYftiGlJYC9XLb4ixCZtQB",uri=" sip:123456@10.10.10.200 ",response="55e03b278f1cbdda52852004bbc8d7c9",algorithm=MD5,cnonce="0f31d b",qop=auth,nc=00000006 Accept-Encoding: identity Accept-Language: en Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,REGISTER,INFO,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,UPDATE,MESSAGE,REFER Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245/V1R003C00S205 Session-ID: 20zlkckj1kz4ll1i1ic2pl1csk80kli1 Content-Length: 318 Content-Type: application/sdp 2016/05/17 10:53:21.642831 10.10.10.200:5060 -> 10.10.10.100:5060 INVITE sip:123456@10.10.10.100:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:10.10.10.200;lr=on;ftag=pk4nzz3j;nat=yes;did=925.a5a1;vst=AAAAAAkLCwgLCnEDBHgfBg4WHwIWHQMuMzc-;vsf=AAAAAAkLAwgLAnEDBHgfBg4WHwIWHQMuMzc-> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.200;branch=z9hG4bKd55d.f4d5d1ee3d090fe847af101d0a47ac5e.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.100:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0lz4ll1ikm1k02p20lz4ll1il Call-ID: lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 From: "654321" <sip:654321@10.10.10.200>;tag=pk4nzz3j To: <sip:123456@10.10.10.200> CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:654321@10.10.10.100:5060;transport=udp> Supported: 100rel,replaces,timer,privacy,in-dialog Session-Expires: 1800 Accept: application/sdp,application/simservs+xml Min-SE: 90 Accept-Encoding: identity Accept-Language: en Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,REGISTER,INFO,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,UPDATE,MESSAGE,REFER Max-Forwards: 69 User-Agent: HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245/V1R003C00S205 Content-Length: 334 Content-Type: application/sdp P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:654321@10.10.10.200> 2016/05/17 10:53:22.121872 10.10.10.200:5060 -> 10.10.10.100:5060 INVITE sip:123456@10.10.10.100:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:10.10.10.200;lr=on;ftag=pk4nzz3j;nat=yes;did=925.a5a1;vst=AAAAAAkLCwgLCnEDBHgfBg4WHwIWHQMuMzc-;vsf=AAAAAAkLAwgLAnEDBHgfBg4WHwIWHQMuMzc-> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.200;branch=z9hG4bKd55d.f4d5d1ee3d090fe847af101d0a47ac5e.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.100:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK0lz4ll1ikm1k02p20lz4ll1il Call-ID: lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 From: "654321" <sip:654321@10.10.10.200>;tag=pk4nzz3j To: <sip:123456@10.10.10.200> CSeq: 2 INVITE Contact: <sip:654321@10.10.10.100:5060;transport=udp> Supported: 100rel,replaces,timer,privacy,in-dialog Session-Expires: 1800 Accept: application/sdp,application/simservs+xml Min-SE: 90 Accept-Encoding: identity Accept-Language: en Allow: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,BYE,CANCEL,REGISTER,INFO,PRACK,SUBSCRIBE,NOTIFY,UPDATE,MESSAGE,REFER Max-Forwards: 69 User-Agent: HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245/V1R003C00S205 Content-Length: 334 Content-Type: application/sdp P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:654321@10.10.10.200> 2016/05/17 10:53:22.996850 10.10.10.100:5060 -> 10.10.10.200:5060 SIP/2.0 481 Call/Transaction Does Not Exist Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.200;branch=z9hG4bKd55d.f4d5d1ee3d090fe847af101d0a47ac5e.0,SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.100:5060;branch=z9hG4bK0lz4ll1ikm1k02p20lz4ll1il;rport=5060 Call-ID: lps4s2204mz4ll1i4mz4ll1ici0lc81i(a)10.10.10.100 From: "654321"<sip:654321@10.10.10.200>;tag=pk4nzz3j To: <sip:123456@10.10.10.200>;tag=m2scp1cm CSeq: 2 INVITE Warning: 399 10.10.10.100 "SS100006F143L3557[05552] No Dialog match" User-Agent: HUAWEI-EchoLife HG8245/V1R003C00S205 Content-Length: 0

3 5

Dialog in delete state is too old
by Emilio Soler Muñoz 23 Jun '16

23 Jun '16

Hello! Kamailio process has stopped. Anyone else has happened? Versión: 4.4 This is what I have in the logs. kamailio.log: 2016-06-23T10:10:33.983494+02:00 kam01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2907]: NOTICE: dialog [dlg_hash.c:245]: dlg_clean_run(): dialog in delete state is too old (0x7f092e15b190 ref 3) 2016-06-23T10:10:34.005015+02:00 kam01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2897]: WARNING: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1348]: dlg_onroute(): inconsitent dlg timer data on dlg 0x7f092e15b190 [3554:5262] with clid 'L, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PU' and tags 'as6b8e8af9' 'as25960d84' 2016-06-23T10:10:34.007989+02:00 kam01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2913]: CRITICAL: <core> [pass_fd.c:275]: receive_fd(): EOF on 17 2016-06-23T10:10:34.008119+02:00 kam01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2823]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:739]: handle_sigs(): child process 2897 exited by a signal 11 2016-06-23T10:10:34.008128+02:00 kam01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[2823]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:742]: handle_sigs(): core was not generated kern.log: [363406.951756] kamailio[2897] general protection ip:7f092c9413a5 sp:7ffdd1065530 error:0 in dialog.so -- Emilio Soler Muñoz <emiliosoler(a)gmail.com>

1 0

Add a user through a http request
by Jay Li 22 Jun '16

22 Jun '16

Dear All, I wonder if Kamailio has the functionality to add a subscriber dynamically. For example, if I use event_route[xhttp:request] to expect a http get request, then based on the received request, add a user in the DB. Not sure what the best approach would be. Any suggestion is appreciated. Thanks. Regards,Jay

2 1

Dispatcher - Route call to alternate server if there is delay to answered call
by Amit Patkar 22 Jun '16

22 Jun '16

Hi I have a scenario where dispatcher is used to balance calls. Assume there are 2 media servers M1 & M2. Call are routed using round robin algorithm. There is scenario where call is handed over to M1 but it is not answered in defined time period (say 5 seconds due to load on server or network congestion), I wish to send this call to M2. What are the options to achieve it? Thanks & Regards, Amit Patkar

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] uac.reg_refresh not removing records from memory
by DanB 22 Jun '16

22 Jun '16

Hey Daniel, Thanks for so fast feedback! No difference as far as I can tell before and after removing the record from db. I have also not disabled specifically the record inside uacreg table but completely removed it from db. I should mention that I have just upgraded to latest 4.4.1 so I should have the flags also saved in db. Here is the record before removal: """ root@iPBXDev1:/etc/ipbxrp# kamcmd -s tcp:127.0.0.1:2046 uac.reg_dump { l_uuid: rsua1_172.16.254.101 l_username: rsua1 l_domain: 172.16.254.101 r_username: cust_sua1 r_domain: 172.16.254.102 realm: auth_username: cust_sua1 auth_password: check123 auth_proxy: sip:172.16.254.102:5060 expires: 3600 flags: 20 diff_expires: 3588 timer_expires: 1466349066 reg_init: 1466345451 reg_delay: 0 } """ and the one after: """ root@iPBXDev1:/etc/ipbxrp# kamcmd -s tcp:127.0.0.1:2046 uac.reg_dump { l_uuid: rsua1_172.16.254.101 l_username: rsua1 l_domain: 172.16.254.101 r_username: cust_sua1 r_domain: 172.16.254.102 realm: auth_username: cust_sua1 auth_password: check123 auth_proxy: sip:172.16.254.102:5060 expires: 3600 flags: 20 diff_expires: 3526 timer_expires: 1466349066 reg_init: 1466345451 reg_delay: 0 } """ Also here is the command refreshing the record (after that is not longer in db): """ POST /jsonrpc HTTP/1.1. Host: 172.16.254.101:5090. User-Agent: Go-http-client/1.1. Content-Length: 85. Content-Type: application/json. Accept-Encoding: gzip. . {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"uac.reg_refresh","params":["rsua1_172.16.254.101"],"id":7} # T 2016/06/19 16:17:47.275473 172.16.254.101:5090 -> 172.16.254.102:58172 [AP] HTTP/1.1 200 OK. Sia: SIP/2.0/TCP 172.16.254.102:58172. Content-Type: application/json. Server: Sipean-RP 4.3.2. Content-Length: 36. . {"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":{},"id":7} """ Ta, DanB On 16.06.2016 12:00, sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org wrote: > Message: 10 Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 08:17:53 +0200 From: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Kamailio (SER) - > Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: > [SR-Users] uac.reg_refresh not removing records from memory > Message-ID: <76d9f2eb-26f7-c0db-8b74-37c93a5d3ef4(a)gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello, On 14/06/16 16:52, DanB > wrote: >> > >> >Hey Guys, >> > >> >I was wondering if there is any dynamic way today to remove a single >> >registration out of memory (and implicitly to force un-REGISTER) >> > >> >Eg: I add one record using uac.reg_refresh (which works fine) but after >> >removing the record from the database and executing uac.reg_refresh >> >again, the record stays in memory until expire. >> >Is there a better way to enforce un-register on remote side? >> > > do the flags in memory of the uac_reg account show that it is disabled? > > Cheers, > Daniel

4 3

WS to WS calls - No ACK received for 200OK
by Amit Patkar 21 Jun '16

21 Jun '16

Hi I am using Kamailio as Websocket proxy. User 1 & User 2 are registered on Kamailio over WebSocket. When User 1 calls User 2, User 2 gets ring and answers the call. 200 OK message is received by User 1 but ACK response sent by User 1 does not reach User 2. Since User 2 didn't get ACS, after 30 sec timeout it drops the call. Media is exchanged for 30 seconds, which means ICE is successful. I am running kamailio 4.3.3 on Kamailio is behind firewall and running on private IP. rtpengine is configured to handle media. All ports are forwarded to kamailio server and Kamailio is allowed to send data on any public IP. I used jssip & sipml framework to test. Result was same for both frameworks. No ACK received I can see following errors in log file. What could be the reason which indicate ACK was not forwarded Jun 21 14:55:41 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6584]: NOTICE: acc [acc.c:317]: acc_log_request(): ACC: transaction answered: timestamp=1466501141;method=INVITE;from_tag=7926B9NR7U0X99ZfAr1T;to_tag=w3D2JGd2EUFJpobTcFyo;call_id=1edc8e15-f1f1-584d-df81-71c3d59d713d;code=200;reason=OK;src_user=10001;src_domain=xxxx.com;src_ip=xxx.yyy.zzz.aaa;dst_ouser=10002;dst_user=10002;dst_domain=df7jal23ls0d.invalid Jun 21 14:55:41 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:529]: forward_request(): cannot forward to af 2, proto 5 no corresponding listening socket Jun 21 14:55:41 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/SL) Jun 21 14:55:42 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6584]: INFO: <script>: WS to WS Jun 21 14:55:42 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:529]: forward_request(): cannot forward to af 2, proto 5 no corresponding listening socket Jun 21 14:55:42 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/SL) Jun 21 14:55:46 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:529]: forward_request(): cannot forward to af 2, proto 5 no corresponding listening socket Jun 21 14:55:46 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/SL) Jun 21 14:55:51 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:529]: forward_request(): cannot forward to af 2, proto 5 no corresponding listening socket Jun 21 14:55:51 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/SL) Jun 21 14:55:57 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:529]: forward_request(): cannot forward to af 2, proto 5 no corresponding listening socket Jun 21 14:55:57 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6582]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/SL) Jun 21 14:56:13 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6581]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:529]: forward_request(): cannot forward to af 2, proto 5 no corresponding listening socket Jun 21 14:56:13 acstemplate /usr/sbin/kamailio[6581]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (7/SL) I searched list for similar issues but could not find match any Help to resolve this issue is appreciated. Thanks & Regards, Amit Patkar

3 4

Kamailio consult CNAM server through SIP Subscribe.
by José Seabra 21 Jun '16

21 Jun '16

Hello there, I need to use kamailio to consult an CNAM server in order to get the caller id name and number to the call, the diagram bellow represents what i need implement: Can I implement this behavior through the following kamailio modules: 1. tm and tmx module (call the function t_suspend and t_continue in order to stop INVITE transaction and resume it). 2. UAC module (generate the SUBSCRIBE sip message) 3. Some kamailio scripting logic to manage this behavior. what are your advices to implement this scenario? Thank you for your help Regards -- Cumprimentos José Seabra

4 17

kamailio question
by Irakli Nanobashvili 21 Jun '16

21 Jun '16

dear sr_users i have a little problem about kamailio sip server and who can help me ?

2 1

Equivalent of OpenSIP's binary interface in Kamailio
by Gholamreza Sabery 21 Jun '16

21 Jun '16

In OpenSIPS binary interface ( https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Interface-Binary-2-2) provides a more efficient way of replicating state between multiple OpenSIPs instances. What is the equivalent feature in Kamailio? Regards

2 2

RTPENGINE rtp errors
by Dmitry 21 Jun '16

21 Jun '16

Hi 1)I encountered such errors when I make an internal call between 2 yate client SIP softphones:rtpengine is used and no audio: | Jun 19 10:02:35 kazootest2 rtpengine[2066]: [918508371(a)kazootest2.siplabs.local port 30942] Error parsing RTP header: short packet (header) when I turn off the rtpengine:THe Freeswitch handles such RTP packets correctly and audio is ok. I compared manually rtp packets from Yate: they comply to the RTP specification. 2) A call from WS client(jssip) to an ordinary sip softphone: | Jun 19 09:58:36 kazootest2 rtpengine[2066]: [s2m2k70tu0d12bjnnamr port 30814] Error parsing RTP header: invalid header version | How to fix these errors? The rtpengine looks through all incoming packets while looking for a new RTP stream. May be packets parsing is too strict? |

1 1

No other running SIP apllication on the machine.//答复: Kamailio ERROR "Address already in use" in tcp_init().
by joey.ren＠yulong.com 20 Jun '16

20 Jun '16

2 1

Kamailio dispatcher module - keep alives
by José Seabra 20 Jun '16

20 Jun '16

Hello there, I have a Kamailio server using dispatcher module to monitor several peers, some of them are in the same network, others are in an external network, for the peers that are in the external network kamailio has to send the OPTIONS(dispatcher keep alives) through another kamailio located in the border and acting as loadbalancer. If i set the dispatcher option "outbound_proxy" all SIP OPTIONS are sent to the outbound proxy configured and it isn't what i need, I need to have by some way a possibility to set outbound_proxy only for the peers that are located on the external network. How can I do that? Regards -- Cumprimentos José Seabra

3 5

Kamailio ERROR "Address already in use" in tcp_init().
by joey.ren＠yulong.com 20 Jun '16

20 Jun '16

3 2

Why SDPOPS does not remove attributes in SDP
by Dmitry 18 Jun '16

18 Jun '16

Hi allI have the following code: if($T_reply_code=="200") { if(has_body("application/sdp")) { xlog("L_INFO", "RTPENGINE received internal reply $T_reply_code $rr SDP extra lines will be removed"); set_rtpengine_set("0"); rtpengine_manage(); sdp_remove_line_by_prefix("a=rtcp"); sdp_remove_line_by_prefix("a=ssrc"); sdp_remove_line_by_prefix("a=ice"); sdp_remove_line_by_prefix("a=candidate"); xlog("L_INFO", "RTPENGINE received internal reply $T_reply_code $rr SDP extra lines removed with SDPOPS"); } }When I look through traces - I see that 200 ok(with SDP) has all these attributes and they are not removed. Why SDPOPS does not remove these attributes?

4 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users