- sr-users - kamailio.org

SIP Authentication
by Girish 04 Apr '16

04 Apr '16

Hello Sir, I am a newbie to Kamailio and I am trying my first setup. I would like to use Kamailio to take in traffic using a SIP Trunk and Route the calls to another SIP trunk based on prefix. I have added the incoming SIP trunk IP address to the address table on the MYSQL but I am unable to get a call routed out. Is there any sample configuration for Authentication via IP address and route the incoming SIP INVITE. Regards, Phoenix

2 1

RPID and Auth DB
by Alberto Sagredo 04 Apr '16

04 Apr '16

Hi! I plan to use rpid field but when trying to get from database, subscriber table has rpid field filled, i get always NULL. Is there any more needed than: modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "rpid") ? Just a check of variable xlog(" Valor de RPID es : $avp(s:rpid)"); Shows me NULL all times Thanks

2 1

KAMAILIO tcp_send query, connection problem
by Ed Todd 04 Apr '16

04 Apr '16

KAMAILIO tcp_send query, connection problem I have a KAMAILIO SIP server on a static IP from Comcast, using a modem/router Cisco DPC39412B. I have a PC application server which is successfully signing on to the SIP server, via a LAN cable on the same network as the SIP server (Cisco). In my second test, the PC application server is connected to the internet via a ZTE Falcon Z-917. In a third test, the PC application server is connected to the internet via a Talk-Talk fiber broadband. The connection does not occur. >From the log files, the successful connection says: Apr 1 10:44:30 SIP-Server kamailio[7817]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2281]: tcpconn_send_put(): tcp_send: send from reader (7817 (14)), reusing fd Apr 1 10:44:30 SIP-Server kamailio[7817]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2516]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: sending... Apr 1 10:44:30 SIP-Server kamailio[7817]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:2550]: tcpconn_do_send(): tcp_send: after real write: c= 0x7f6270b8a4a0 n=565 fd=1 On the failed connection: Apr 1 09:41:23 SIP-Server kamailio[7816]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1818]: tcp_send(): tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one Apr 1 09:41:23 SIP-Server kamailio[7816]: DEBUG: <core> [ip_addr.c:243]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 192.168.0.146 Apr 1 09:41:23 SIP-Server kamailio[7816]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1073]: tcpconn_new(): tcpconn_new: on port 55133, type 3 Apr 1 09:41:23 SIP-Server kamailio[7816]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:1382]: tcpconn_add(): tcpconn_add: hashes: 1776:802:0, 803 Apr 1 09:41:23 SIP-Server kamailio[7816]: DEBUG: tls [tls_server.c:184]: tls_complete_init(): Using TLS domain TLSc<default A while later, I get: Apr 1 09:41:37 SIP-Server kamailio[7804]: DEBUG: usrloc [urecord.c:357]: wb_timer(): Binding 'hvs_us_iphone','sip:hvs_us_iphone@172.56.8.182:44341;transport=TLS;line=75dc89bd64369c7' has expired Apr 1 09:41:38 SIP-Server kamailio[7820]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7f6270b8a4a0 (ticks=862851529, timeout=862909176 (3602 s), wr_timeout=862851529 (0 s)), write queue: 197 bytes Apr 1 09:41:38 SIP-Server kamailio[7820]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.0.146:55133 failed (timeout) Apr 1 09:41:38 SIP-Server kamailio[7820]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7f6270b8a4a Any clues or tips would be greatly appreciated! Ed

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] Multiple Registrations - Overwrite oldest contact
by Bruno Emer 03 Apr '16

03 Apr '16

Sure it is! This is exactly what I was looking for! Actually I wasn't able to see that there was a way to perform this action! Thanks for your help, Olle! I will try to create this, and when I have it done, I will post my script here, so if someone else need the same problem I can help. Now, I have just one more question about my scenario: when I register a user, is there a way to create something like a "custom field" on the location? To explain better: If possible, I can add something like a custom header that says if the user is registered from a phone device or the web interface, then I can perform the loop and replace only the oldest contact using that device... *Bruno Emer* Mobile: +55 11 96540-0044 email: brunoemer(a)gmail.com 2016-04-01 17:18 GMT-03:00 Bruno Emer <brunoemer(a)gmail.com>: > This is my problem... I want to have 2 contacts for AOR, and not only one. > > When the 3rd arrives, it must remove the oldest and continue with 2... > > *If I am using the 0x04 parameter, it will save just one contact, and the > user will not be able to get the Invite both, in the mobile device and web > interface.* > > *Bruno Emer* > > Mobile: +55 11 96540-0044 > email: brunoemer(a)gmail.com > <https://www.facebook.com/bruno.emer.5> > <https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=86461237&trk=spm_pic> > <https://twitter.com/brunoemer_> > <https://www.flickr.com/photos/122070309@N03/> > <http://google.com/+BrunoEmer> <http://instagram.com/brunoemer_> > > 2016-04-01 17:07 GMT-03:00 Bruno Emer <brunoemer(a)gmail.com>: > >> Hello, *Olle!* >> >> *Thanks for your help in this case, and don't worry about the time >> (actually I wasn't even expecting to get an answer today).* >> >> >> *I know the max_contacts parameter. But the problem is that if I set the >> max_contacts to 2, when the user tries to register again, he gets an error >> message 503. The point is that I want to get the user registered, and >> replace the oldest location entry for the newest one.* >> >> >> >> *Bruno Emer* >> >> Mobile: +55 11 96540-0044 >> email: brunoemer(a)gmail.com >> >> 2016-04-01 16:31 GMT-03:00 Bruno Emer <brunoemer(a)gmail.com>: >> >>> Hello all. >>> >>> I have problem here and I tried to find a solution and search over >>> internet, but without success. >>> >>> My scenario is the following: I have an application that must be >>> registered in Kamailio when a user logs in the web interface, so he can get >>> calls (something like a web softphone using webrtc). At this point, we are >>> OK, and everything is working fine. >>> >>> To get these register functions I am using the parameter >>> "save("location", "0x04")" as described in the REGISTRAR module >>> documentation, so if a user logs in another web browser or computer, only >>> the last one will continue registered and all calls will be forwarded to >>> him. >>> >>> The point is that now we are creating a phone app that will do almost >>> the same thing as the web interface, allowing users to receive calls using >>> the mobile device, and here is my problem: I want to allow my users to be >>> registered on two devices at the same time, but if a user logs into another >>> device, I don't want to reply with a 503. I want to allow the user to >>> register again, deregistering the oldest contact. >>> >>> I saw that there is a module named "ims_usrloc_scscf" and on its >>> description it says "implemented overwrite oldest contact behaviour", >>> but I couldn't find any documentation about it. >>> >>> So, is there a way to get this working today? >>> >>> >>> *Bruno Emer* >>> >>> Mobile: +55 11 96540-0044 >>> email: brunoemer(a)gmail.com >>> >> >> >

3 2

kamailio proxy
by liwei＠neulinx.com 03 Apr '16

03 Apr '16

hi ， I want to use kamailio as a proxy ; / gateway1 ----->pstn / 1、 call from backend server ---> kamailio ----->gateway2 -----> pstn \ \ gateway3 ------->pstn 2、caller and callee number translation ; Could you please give me some suggest; Wade From China liwei(a)neulinx.com

2 1

SQlite DB Lock with Presence
by Kristian Kielhofner 02 Apr '16

02 Apr '16

Hello everyone, I'm trying to use BLF with the config here (except with SQlite): http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf BLF seems to work perfectly except after the call is ended I get "sqlite commit failed: database is locked" error messages as seen here: http://pastebin.com/xVijj98H BLF is then broken at this point. kamailio -v version: kamailio 4.3.5 (x86_64/linux) 950657 flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_PTHREAD_MUTEX, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 950657 compiled on 01:33:01 Mar 29 2016 with x86_64-openwrt-linux-gnu-gcc 4.8.3 Has anyone ever seen this before? Thanks! -- Kristian Kielhofner

3 9

MSRP question
by Hussein Said 02 Apr '16

02 Apr '16

2 4

kamailio proxy
by liwei＠neulinx.com 02 Apr '16

02 Apr '16

hi ， I want to use kamailio as a proxy ; / gateway1 ----->pstn / 1、 call from backend server ---> kamailio ----->gateway2 -----> pstn \ \ gateway3 ------->pstn 2、caller and callee number translation ; Could you please give me some suggest; Wade From China liwei(a)neulinx.com

1 0

Trouble initializing TLS on Fedora 23
by Anthony Messina 02 Apr '16

02 Apr '16

Happy New Year! I've just upgraded my Kamailio (build from master@c7e411e) instance to Fedora 23 from Fedora 22. I've built the packages specifically for Fedora 23 with the following current sources: openssl-1.0.2e-3.fc23.x86_64 openssl-libs-1.0.2e-3.fc23.x86_64 openssl version reports... OpenSSL 1.0.2e-fips 3 Dec 2015 Even so, the following error occurs. It seems like Kamailio having trouble detecting that I'm using running with the same version that I have installed, and the same version that I have compiled against. tls [tls_init.c:557]: init_tls_h(): ERROR: tls: init_tls_h: installed openssl library version is too different from the library the Kamailio tls module was compiled with: installed "OpenSSL 1.0.0-fips 29 Mar 2010" (0x10000003), compiled "OpenSSL 1.0.2d-fips 9 Jul 2015" (0x1000204f). Please make sure a compatible version is used (tls_force_run in kamailio.cfg will override this check) CRITICAL: <core> [main.c:2558]: main(): could not initialize tls, exiting... Any pointers? -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

3 7

Re: [SR-Users] Multiple Registrations - Overwrite oldest contact
by Bruno Emer 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hello, *Olle!* *Thanks for your help in this case, and don't worry about the time (actually I wasn't even expecting to get an answer today).* *I know the max_contacts parameter. But the problem is that if I set the max_contacts to 2, when the user tries to register again, he gets an error message 503. The point is that I want to get the user registered, and replace the oldest location entry for the newest one.* *Bruno Emer* Mobile: +55 11 96540-0044 email: brunoemer(a)gmail.com 2016-04-01 16:31 GMT-03:00 Bruno Emer <brunoemer(a)gmail.com>: > Hello all. > > I have problem here and I tried to find a solution and search over > internet, but without success. > > My scenario is the following: I have an application that must be > registered in Kamailio when a user logs in the web interface, so he can get > calls (something like a web softphone using webrtc). At this point, we are > OK, and everything is working fine. > > To get these register functions I am using the parameter "save("location", > "0x04")" as described in the REGISTRAR module documentation, so if a user > logs in another web browser or computer, only the last one will continue > registered and all calls will be forwarded to him. > > The point is that now we are creating a phone app that will do almost the > same thing as the web interface, allowing users to receive calls using the > mobile device, and here is my problem: I want to allow my users to be > registered on two devices at the same time, but if a user logs into another > device, I don't want to reply with a 503. I want to allow the user to > register again, deregistering the oldest contact. > > I saw that there is a module named "ims_usrloc_scscf" and on its > description it says "implemented overwrite oldest contact behaviour", but > I couldn't find any documentation about it. > > So, is there a way to get this working today? > > > *Bruno Emer* > > Mobile: +55 11 96540-0044 > email: brunoemer(a)gmail.com >

2 3

Multiple Registrations - Overwrite oldest contact
by Bruno Emer 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hello all. I have problem here and I tried to find a solution and search over internet, but without success. My scenario is the following: I have an application that must be registered in Kamailio when a user logs in the web interface, so he can get calls (something like a web softphone using webrtc). At this point, we are OK, and everything is working fine. To get these register functions I am using the parameter "save("location", "0x04")" as described in the REGISTRAR module documentation, so if a user logs in another web browser or computer, only the last one will continue registered and all calls will be forwarded to him. The point is that now we are creating a phone app that will do almost the same thing as the web interface, allowing users to receive calls using the mobile device, and here is my problem: I want to allow my users to be registered on two devices at the same time, but if a user logs into another device, I don't want to reply with a 503. I want to allow the user to register again, deregistering the oldest contact. I saw that there is a module named "ims_usrloc_scscf" and on its description it says "implemented overwrite oldest contact behaviour", but I couldn't find any documentation about it. So, is there a way to get this working today? *Bruno Emer* Mobile: +55 11 96540-0044 email: brunoemer(a)gmail.com

2 2

Make Kamailio Great Again!
by Alex Balashov 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

For immediate release: ATLANTA, GA (1 April 2016)--Alex J. Balashov, a self-styled businessman based in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, has a plan to "Make Kamailio Great Again". "Evariste Systems is huge. My name is on the building," said Balashov of his iconic VoIP consulting brand. "And you know what, I have been very successful. Everybody loves me." Balashov has capitalised on a contentious election cycle marked by deep political polarisation, growing income inequality and geopolitical challenges such as global terrorism. And his sharp message of alarm about the declining influence of the Kamailio SIP server project has resonated with increasing numbers in the CxO suite, vaulting him to the lead in the race for the IETF SIP Working Group nomination, according to recent polls of primary voters. He has been quick to tout his competitive credentials in a tough global open-source ecosystem. At a recent colloqium on unified communications, he asked: "When was the last time anybody saw us beating, let's say, OpenSIPS in Git commits? They kill us. I beat OpenSIPS all the time. All the time." As Balashov sees it, a major cause of the beleaguered Kamailio project's woes lies in its liberal patch acceptance policy and lax scrutiny of third-party contributions: "When GitHub sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people." He has proposed a controversial solution that has drawn ire from liberal ranks in the open-source community, but has also attracted applause and standing ovations at his speaking engagements: "We have to have a firewall around the Kamailio source code. We have to have an access control list. And in that firewall, we're going to have a big fat door where commits and pull requests can come into the master branch, but they have to come in legally. The firewall will go up, and GitHub will start behaving." Balashov's firewall proposal has been met with scorn from critics who deride it as impractical and quixotic. In particular, commentators have raised questions about funding and resources as well as GitHub's willingness to entertain a boundary around a project in its vicinity. Balashov isn't concerned, however: "I will build a great firewall--and nobody builds firewalls better than me, believe me--and I'll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great stateful packet inspection wall on our border with GitHub, and I will make GitHub pay for that wall. Mark my words." He has also been rebuked by rival IETF leadership candidates for his often acerbic Twitter remarks directed at Lennart Poettering and the developers of "firewalld". As he sees it, however, the network effects of social media are a strength: "My Twitter has become so powerful that I can actually make my enemies tell the truth." He scoffed at the suggestion that his characterisations of industry actors behind the RedHat-led "systemd" movement are misleading: "RedHat was the worst Steward of Linux in the history of the kernel. There has never been a Steward so bad as RedHat. The source code blew up around us. We lost everything, including all synergies. There wasn't one good thing that came out of that administration or them being Stewards of Linux." Balashov's idiosyncratic campaign is not standing still. He has proven to be a capable populist, adapting rapidly to an evolving sense of the kinds of pronouncements that activate his swelling crowds of devotees. Along the way, he has deftly deflected calls to subject his policy proposals to expert review. "I know what I'm doing, and I listen to a lot of people, I talk to a lot of people, and at the appropriate time I'll tell you who the people are. But I speak to a lot of people, but my primary consultant is myself, and I have a good instinct for this stuff." At a recent gathering of SIP stack interoperability specialists, Balashov the latest pillar of his platform to "Make Kamailio Great Again", in view of growing security vulnerabilities in the latest Kamailio modules: "Alex J. Balashov is calling for a total and complete shutdown of commits entering the master branch from the territory of the European Union until our project's representatives can figure out what's going on. According to Netcraft, among others, there are a lot of buffer overflows in Kamailio by large segments of the EU population."

2 1

Acc INVITE dialog start timing difference
by Dirk Teurlings - Signet B.V. 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hi, I'm seeing a difference in timestamp for acc modules recorderd INVITES and the dialog start event. This is the log entry: Apr 1 12:55:59 host /usr/sbin/kamailio[15642]: INFO: <script>: 5d3ff3407b9761b24c4f75195c6ccb1d@192.168.10.245:5060 - dialog:start And this has been added by ACC in the database: INVITE as2880319e 56FE53B9-49E3774-3E86ED1B 5d3ff3407b9761b24c4f75195c6ccb1d@192.168.10.245:50... 200 OK 2016-04-01 12:56:01 Why are these two seconds apart? Shouldn't the acc module record the same dialog start event time as the start of a dialog? When I look at the value of DLG_lifetime this confirms my findings, as it results in: dialog_time = TS - dlg_start When looking at the database BYE-time - INVITE time, the call is two seconds shorter. Any insight would be appreciated! Cheers, Dirk

1 0

Kamailio start up issue
by NITESH BANSAL 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hello, I installed Kamailio 4.3 on debian wheezy machine using debian package from https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/packages/debsThe installation went fine, but I'm unable to start kamailio. It seems that Kamailio is having issue locating the issues.Kamailio installed all the modules in location '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules', when building from source, it usedto copy modules in '/usr/lib/kamailio/modules'.Any suggestions on how can I fix it? Thanks,Nitesh

1 1

Framework/Lib to create SIP packets
by Igor Olhovskiy 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hi, all Not a Kamailio-related question, but. I want to form SIP-packets with info I need and receive answers. At first iteration in would be PUBLISH (with XML info) messages (PUBLISH - 200 OK) sent to Kamailio. I want to use Python (more preferable) or Lua (less preferable). Is there any lib I can create messages with, or forget and just use plain text + UDP socket? -- Best regards, Igor

5 13

HOW send 4XX to the caller when the callee response to bye is 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist
by Humberto H 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hello; [image: Inline image 1] HOW can I send 4XX to the caller when the callee response to a BYE message is: *481 Call leg/transaction does not exist. BUT the caller is waiting.* Before this message. I drop the bye sent by the callee, my purpose here is "*Do not send the BYE TO THE CALLER"* JUST send a message in order to the caller do failover, If I send *BYE* to the caller it can't do failover Thanks in advance. 10.929596| | BYE | | |SIP Request BYE CSeq:104 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | | |10.929981| | 481 Call leg/transac | |SIP Status 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist | | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | | |10.929983| | 481 Call leg/transac | |SIP Status 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist Call leg/transaction does not exist | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | | |10.930445| | 481 Call leg/transac | |SIP Status 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | | |10.930451| | 481 Call leg/transac | |SIP Status 481 Call leg/transaction does not exist

2 1

How can I send 404 to the caller instead of BYE?
by Humberto H 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hello I am trying to send 404 to the caller instead of BYE. Using the configuration showned bellow. when the callee send BYE Kamailio sends -- *404* to the callee (to the source of the BYE signaling) --- and *BYE* to the caller But I need to send 404 response to the caller only Thanks in advance event_route[dialog:end] { if(is_method("BYE") && ((src_ip==XXXXXXX) )){ send_reply("404", "Not found"); xlog("L_INFO","ENVIO 404 ON BYE \n"); } exit; }

2 1

stateful messages in a dialog
by Al S 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hi, I would like to know how I can make subsequent messages in a dialog (ACK and BYE) to be stateful.Your help will be greatly appreciated. // reroute INVITE after timeout.failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]{ if (t_branch_timeout()) { # change to new destination IP $rd = "10.10.10.10"; t_relay(); exit; }...} Thanks,AS

2 1

Record-Route header
by jignesh gandhi 01 Apr '16

01 Apr '16

Hello All, I have a need to save the Record-Route header from the INVITE and use it as a route header in requests like BYE. PROXY --> Kamailio(as PROXY) --> Asterisk I am using rr module to add a record_route when passing the INVITE to Asterisk. Thanks, Jignesh Gandhi

2 4

Re: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration
by Jignesh Gandhi 31 Mar '16

31 Mar '16

Thanks Alex for you reply. I understand the dispatcher module can be used to load balance inbound requests. But my questions is more related with outbound requests thru Kamailio. Are you saying that in-dialog request can be routed automatically by Kamailio to the correct Asterisk instance on the back end ? And this is included in the stock config ? I was just looking for an example. Thanks, --Jignesh On 3/30/16, 6:00 AM, "sr-users on behalf of sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org" <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org on behalf of sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org> wrote: >Send sr-users mailing list submissions to > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org > >You can reach the person managing the list at > sr-users-owner(a)lists.sip-router.org > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Destination Timeout (ACK message) (Al S) > 2. Proxy configuration (Jignesh Gandhi) > 3. Re: Proxy configuration (Alex Balashov) > 4. Local Kamailio share a hosted Kamailio/Asterisk sip server > (S?bastien Brice) > 5. SQlite DB Lock with Presence (Kristian Kielhofner) > 6. Kamailio local and hosted (S?bastien Brice) > 7. Re: Releasing Kamailio v4.4.0 (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 8. Re: SQlite DB Lock with Presence (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:27:56 -0400 >From: Al S <alirsm(a)outlook.com> >To: "sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Subject: [SR-Users] Destination Timeout (ACK message) >Message-ID: <BAY177-W1513432E7A3AFDAAB1DE8DD4870(a)phx.gbl> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > >Hi, >The destination node is down. By adding the following code Kamailo re-routing INVITE to a new destination after getting 408 timeout (as below). > >failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]{ if (t_branch_timeout()) { # change to new destination IP $rd = "10.10.10.10"; t_relay(); exit; }...} >However, the ACK message coming from source is still being send to the old destination. How can I reroute other messages in the dialog to be sent to this new destination.. >Thank, >AS >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160329/b91e2df…> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:24:01 +0000 >From: Jignesh Gandhi <Jignesh.Gandhi(a)MoviusCorp.com> >To: "sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Subject: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration >Message-ID: <011222F3-5820-41FB-A0D8-8D727EA121FA(a)moviuscorp.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >Hello, > >Is it possible to use kamailio to be a stateful outbound proxy ? > >The use case is kamailio is an outbound proxy for multiple instances of Asterisk. >Thus all responses need to go back to the same instance of Asterisk that generated them. > >After the call is established. >How can I ensure that the Re-Invites, BYEs, etc are sent to the same instance of Asterisk that generated the outbound Invite ? > >Any help is appreciated. > >Thanks, >--Jignesh >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160329/5081718…> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:29:19 -0400 >From: Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> >To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Proxy configuration >Message-ID: <56FA913F.6080903(a)evaristesys.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > >Jignesh, > >Everything you're asking for is part of Kamailio's core functionality: > >1. Most useful applications of Kamailio involve stateful relay, and the >stock included configurations are stateful. > >2. The loose-routing section of the configuration, and, more broadly, >RFC 3261 in general, take care of routing in-dialog requests (ACKs, >reinvites, BYEs, etc.) to the appropriate dialog party. > >3. Load-balancing/distribution among Asterisk instances can be done with >the 'dispatcher' module; there are many examples floating around, as >it's one of the most common applications for Kamailio. > >-- Alex > >-- >Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC >1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 >Atlanta, GA 30309 >United States > >Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) >Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:32:36 +0200 (CEST) >From: S?bastien Brice <sebastien.brice(a)jvs.fr> >To: sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Subject: [SR-Users] Local Kamailio share a hosted Kamailio/Asterisk > sip server >Message-ID: <2011796741.12246629.1459261956126.JavaMail.zimbra(a)jvs.fr> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > >Hi everyone >At my workplace there's plenty of hardphone directly connected to an hosted sbc in the cloud. >As an added value i proposed to add locally Kamailio as a proxy server to 'federate' all the sip traffic. > >ipphone behind nat (A) <---> sip proxy local 192.168.x.x (B)<----> sbc registrar (mydomain.com) and sip proxy with public IP (C) > >when hardphone try to register, B rewrite (with rewritehost) the ip public of (C). B then uses exported function of TM to t_relay_to(C). >to route INVITE?from A to C i use proxy_authenticate("mydomain.com") function (on B) from auth_db to pass the calls inbetween. > >This works well, but i am wondering if that makes sense if i get several phones behind B. >Should stateless forward works better in this kind of scenario? > >In a near future i plan to offer disaster recovery, and i want all users binding to C (users(a)mydomain.com)instead bind on B (in case link B---C get down)and assume some kind of telephone functionnality >Is that possible ? >Do you have some sort of example Kamailio do it good On-premise/localy ? >How to deal with nat since all hardphones have rfc1918?address? > >thx you > >PS: as an sbc (C) i did setup kamailio/asterisk in a real-time configuration. > > > >S?bastien BRICE VoIP, Support et Int?gration > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:50:14 -0400 >From: Kristian Kielhofner <kris(a)kriskinc.com> >To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Subject: [SR-Users] SQlite DB Lock with Presence >Message-ID: > <CAKDfjge4kLhdLjV5V7gsOOsLsdByeLgtwnqE-EEXHhxbVeV8Ag(a)mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >Hello everyone, > > I'm trying to use BLF with the config here (except with SQlite): > >http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf > > BLF seems to work perfectly except after the call is ended I get >"sqlite commit failed: database is locked" error messages as seen >here: > >http://pastebin.com/xVijj98H > >BLF is then broken at this point. > >kamailio -v >version: kamailio 4.3.5 (x86_64/linux) 950657 >flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, >USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, >SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, >FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_PTHREAD_MUTEX, USE_DNS_CACHE, >USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES >ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, >MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB >poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. >id: 950657 >compiled on 01:33:01 Mar 29 2016 with x86_64-openwrt-linux-gnu-gcc 4.8.3 > >Has anyone ever seen this before? > >Thanks! > >-- >Kristian Kielhofner > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 6 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:38:40 +0200 (CEST) >From: S?bastien Brice <sebastien.brice(a)jvs.fr> >To: sr-users <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio local and hosted >Message-ID: <1194659979.12170808.1459255120868.JavaMail.zimbra(a)jvs.fr> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > >Hi everyone >At my workplace there's plenty of hardphone directly connected to an hosted sbc in the cloud. >As an added value i proposed to add locally Kamailio as a proxy server to 'federate' all the sip traffic. > >ipphone behind nat (A) <---> sip proxy local 192.168.x.x (B)<----> sbc registrar (mydomain.com) and sip proxy with public IP (C) > >when hardphone try to register, B rewrite (with rewritehost) the ip public of (C). B then uses exported function of TM to t_relay_to(C). >to route INVITE?from A to C i use proxy_authenticate("mydomain.com") function (on B) from auth_db to pass the calls inbetween. > >This works well, but i am wondering if that makes sense if i get several phones behind B. >Should stateless forward works better in this kind of scenario? > >In a near future i plan to offer disaster recovery, and i want all users binding to C (users(a)mydomain.com)instead bind on B (in case link B---C get down)and assume some kind of telephone functionnality >Is that possible ? >Do you have some sort of example Kamailio do it good On-premise/localy ? >How to deal with nat since all hardphones have rfc1918?address? >, >thx you > >PS: as an sbc (C) i did setup kamailio/asterisk in a real-time configuration. > > > >S?bastien BRICE VoIP, Support et Int?gration > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 7 >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:02:02 +0200 >From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> >To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" > <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>, sr-dev <sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org>, > "business(a)lists.kamailio.org" <business(a)lists.kamailio.org> >Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Releasing Kamailio v4.4.0 >Message-ID: <56FB87FA.8080304(a)gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > >Hello, > >the final packaging for 4.4.0 is expected to start after 14:00UTC today. >Backports to branch 4.4 can be done up to 12:00UTC, after that let's >sync on sr-dev mailing list, because I will start testing how it builds >on different platforms and it is good to have the a consistent source code. > >Cheers, >Daniel > >On 29/03/16 09:04, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> Hello, >> >> refreshing about the major release 4.4.0 planned for tomorrow -- if any >> dev has patches to backport to branch 4.4 should do it as soon as possible. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >> On 18/03/16 12:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> with no major issues reported lately, I think we are on a good track for >>> releasing stable v4.4.0. Next week a lot of people prepare for Easter, >>> therefore I propose to do the release on Wednesday, March 30, 2016. If >>> new things pop up, the exact date can be adjusted a bit before or after >>> the current proposal. >>> >>> Any new discovered issue should be reported to bug trucker: >>> >>> * https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues >>> >>> Help to complete the upgrade guide would be very appreciated: >>> >>> * https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/upgrade/stable-to-devel >>> >>> A draft list of what is new in 4.4 is already available at: >>> >>> * https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/features/new-in-4.4.x >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> > >-- >Daniel-Constantin Mierla >http://www.asipto.com >http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 8 >Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:37:39 +0200 >From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> >To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" > <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Subject: Re: [SR-Users] SQlite DB Lock with Presence >Message-ID: <56FB9E63.7040104(a)gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > >Hello, > >not using sqlite here, but could be related to presence modules doing db >transactions and not releasing the locks. Do you get the issue after the >first call, or it runs for a while and at some point it breaks? > >Cheers, >Daniel > >On 30/03/16 02:50, Kristian Kielhofner wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> I'm trying to use BLF with the config here (except with SQlite): >> >> http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf >> >> BLF seems to work perfectly except after the call is ended I get >> "sqlite commit failed: database is locked" error messages as seen >> here: >> >> http://pastebin.com/xVijj98H >> >> BLF is then broken at this point. >> >> kamailio -v >> version: kamailio 4.3.5 (x86_64/linux) 950657 >> flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, >> USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, >> SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, >> FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_PTHREAD_MUTEX, USE_DNS_CACHE, >> USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES >> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, >> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB >> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. >> id: 950657 >> compiled on 01:33:01 Mar 29 2016 with x86_64-openwrt-linux-gnu-gcc 4.8.3 >> >> Has anyone ever seen this before? >> >> Thanks! >> > >-- >Daniel-Constantin Mierla >http://www.asipto.com >http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com > > > > >------------------------------ > >Subject: Digest Footer > >_______________________________________________ >sr-users mailing list >sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > >------------------------------ > >End of sr-users Digest, Vol 130, Issue 29 >*****************************************

2 1

timeout function
by Al S 31 Mar '16

31 Mar '16

Hi, I am routing call traffic thru proxy to destination A. If destination A is down, we need to reroute to destination B. What function we can use to process timeout so we can reroute the calls to different node? Thanks,ARM

2 1

TCP connection select problem
by 张顺通 31 Mar '16

31 Mar '16

my program structure is LinPhone------TCP------KA_EDGE------UDP------KA_REGISTER------UDP------FS KA_EDGE:all clients TCP connection is in this server KS_REGSITER:all register info is process here when User A want to use program,Linphone send SIP REGISTER to KA_EDGE by TCP(and TCP is always present), and KA_EDGE send to KA_REGISTER by UDP. when FS want to Call A, FS generate SIP: INVITE A@KA_REGISTER_IP KA_REGISTER recive INVITE, lookup the register list, send to KA_EDGE INVITE TCP_IP:TCP_PORT Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT and LinPhone recive that INVITE. *my question is:* LinPhone A and LinPhone B both register in KA_REGISTER. FS send INVITE: INVITE B: KA_REGISTER_IP and KA_REGISTER lookup correct，send to KA_EDGE INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT but KA_EDGE is not correct.sip is correct,* but KA_EDGE send the INVITE to A' TCP connnection* INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT Someone had this problem?Is this a bug?

4 19

db_cassandra status and plans
by Andreas Granig 31 Mar '16

31 Mar '16

Hi all, I was checking db_cassandra with Kamailio 4.3 recently to try making it work as a usrloc back-end, and my observation is that the module has quite some issues. In general, the module states that it's only tested with cassandra 1.0.6, which is really out-dated. I tried with the latest version of the 1.0 series (1.0.12) and even with lots of fiddling I didn't manage to make it work, could be my fault though. There has not been any work for 4 years other than cosmetical documentation fixes two years ago. Documentation is missing important information how to set up the version table, that could be fixed though. The schema definition in the documentation is missing new columns which have been introduced, that could be fixed as well. The module uses the legacy thrift interface, whereas nowadays (since cassandra 1.2+) a native cql driver is available as open-source. The module can not be used together with nathelper for nat pings, since the queries don't provide a key, which is required for cassandra. Our plan is to revamp the whole module and make it work with recent cassandra versions and remove the nat ping limitations. Main question is whether to go for a new module or replacing the old one, since it doesn't seem to work anymore anyways. Feedback whether you got it working with Kamailio 4.3+ and your views on future plans is much appreciated! Andreas

3 5

acc_cdrs empty
by Nelson Migliaro 31 Mar '16

31 Mar '16

Hello, I am not able to set up cdr. I see acc table is updated with 2 new entries after each call (INVITE and BYE) but acc_cdrs is empty. There are errors in the log. I think that I set up everything but is not working, - load the module, set module params and set the flag? Am I missing something, should I use a store procedure or something? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ loadmodule "acc.so" modparam("acc", "early_media", 0) modparam("acc", "report_ack", 0) modparam("acc", "report_cancels", 0) modparam("acc", "detect_direction", 1) modparam("acc", "db_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "db_missed_flag", FLT_ACCMISSED) modparam("acc", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("acc", "cdr_enable", 1) modparam("acc", "cdr_start_on_confirmed", 1) modparam("acc", "cdrs_table", "acc_cdrs") modparam("acc", "cdr_start_id", "start_time") modparam("acc", "cdr_end_id", "end_time") modparam("acc", "cdr_duration_id", "duration") if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting } route[WITHINDLG] { if (has_totag()) { if (loose_route()) { route(DLGURI); if (is_method("BYE")) { CREATE TABLE `acc_cdrs` ( `id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, `start_time` varchar(32) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `end_time` varchar(32) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `duration` varchar(32) NOT NULL DEFAULT '', PRIMARY KEY (`id`), KEY `start_time_idx` (`start_time`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1$$ Thank you.

1 1

UAC Register Asterisk
by Alberto Sagredo 31 Mar '16

31 Mar '16

Hi Im trying to modify example for Asterisk/Kamailio integration that miconda did, and trying to handle Forwarded register to Asterisk in an authenticated way instead removing secret in asterisk. I have made this changes route[REGFWD] { if(!is_method("REGISTER")) { return; } $var(rip) = $var(astip); $uac_req(method)="REGISTER"; $uac_req(ruri)="sip:" + $var(rip) + ":" + $var(astport); $uac_req(furi)="sip:" + $(au{s.substr,8,0}) + "@" + $var(rip); $uac_req(turi)="sip:" + $(au{s.substr,8,0}) + "@" + $var(rip); $uac_req(hdrs)="Contact: <sip:" + $au + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.kamailio.bindip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.kamailio.bindport) + ">\r\n"; if($sel(contact.expires) != $null) $uac_req(hdrs)= $uac_req(hdrs) + "Expires: " + $sel(contact.expires) + "\r\n"; else $uac_req(hdrs)= $uac_req(hdrs) + "Expires: " + $hdr(Expires) + "\r\n"; xlog("Dentro de REGFWD"); t_on_failure("REG_AST"); uac_req_send(); } failure_route[REG_AST] { if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } xlog("Dentro de REG AST"); if(t_check_status("401|407")) { xlog("Dentro de 401"); $avp(auser) = "test"; $avp(apass) = "test"; uac_auth(); t_relay(); exit; } } What i see on traces: U x.x.x..240:5060 -> x.x.x..56:5060 REGISTER sip:x.x.x.56:5060 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x.240;branch=z9hG4bKfb46.a47535d4000000000000000000000000.0. To: <sip:200@x.x.x.56>. From: <sip:200@x.x.x.56>;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-6a4f. CSeq: 10 REGISTER. Call-ID: 09dc120d65932ed7-16044(a)127.0.0.1. Max-Forwards: 70. Content-Length: 0. User-Agent: ANY. Contact: <sip:emp_001_200@x.x.x.240:5060>. Expires: 3600. . # U x.x.x.56:5060 -> x.x.x..240:5060 SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x..240 ;branch=z9hG4bKfb46.a47535d4000000000000000000000000.0;received=x.x.x..240 ;rport=5060. From: <sip:200@x.x.x.56>;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-6a4f. To: <sip:200@x.x.x.56>;tag=as62b47138. Call-ID: 09dc120d65932ed7-16044(a)127.0.0.1. CSeq: 10 REGISTER. Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.17.1). Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE. Supported: replaces, timer. WWW-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm="asterisk", nonce="59e39692". Content-Length: 0. . But Kamailio is not sending authentication . Any idea what could be wrong? Or any tip to do what i try. The idea is that a sip endpoint register with authentication on kamailio and it sends register with authentication to asterisk. Thanks in advance

4 7

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users