- sr-users - kamailio.org

5.6.4 debian htable dbmode=1 not writing at shutdown
by Bernd Krueger-Knauber 29 Nov '23

29 Nov '23

Hi, I have still the problem that my htables are not written into a sqlite db when I shutdown kamailio. Manual writing via: kamcmd htable.store ... is working. As I can see in the logs with highest loglevel, the function destroy() is never called. ht_db_url.len is > 0 ht_db_init_con() should work, else nothing would work with the db. But I can not see the debug messages from ht_db_open_con() Any ideas? Best regards, Bernd

5 5

Incompatibility of the DMQ htable protocol with older Kamailio versions
by Denys Pozniak 29 Nov '23

29 Nov '23

Hello! I noticed that there are differences in the DMQ htable replication protocol for the old version of Kamailio 5.2 and the new 5.7. For example, the new version uses action 2 when updating values and action 4 to remove. The old Kamailio version uses the values 1 and 3 respectively. Well, as a result, the htable data is not shared between such nodes, plus there are errors in the syslog of the old version: ERROR: htable [ht_dmq.c:328]: ht_dmq_handle_msg(): failed to replay action It would probably be worth introducing some kind of DMQ htable protocol versioning to maintain compatibility? And is there any option to make them work together (I wouldn’t really want to change the action number in sip/sdp/json on the fly)? Kamialio 5.2 {"action":1,"htname":"shared","cname":"user","type":2,"strval":"uri","mode":1} {"action":3,"htname":"shared","cname":"user","mode":0} Kamailio 5.7 {"action":2,"htname":"shared","cname":"user","type":2,"strval":"uri","mode":1} {"action":4,"htname":"shared","cname":"user","mode":0} -- BR, Denys Pozniak

2 2

tps_storage_fill_contact(): no r-uri user
by Denys Pozniak 28 Nov '23

28 Nov '23

Hello! My topology is like this: PBX -> Kamailio Topos -> User When calling the user, PBX does not add the user part in the Contact URI, something like: Contact: <sip:10.10.10.10:5080;transport=udp> When the customer sends a reinvite, the topos turns off for this transaction and the sip partially breaks down with error: topos [tps_storage.c:319]: tps_storage_fill_contact(): no r-uri user topos [tps_storage.c:615]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store As far as I understand, the RFC allows the absence of the user part in the URI and this occurs quite often. I can provide the pcap file and debug log in a private message if this helps identify the essence of the problem. # kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.7.1 (x86_64/linux) 1cf389-dirty -- BR, Denys Pozniak

3 5

Kamailio ver 5.7.3 - source installation warnings
by Muhammad Danish Moosa 28 Nov '23

28 Nov '23

Hi, I am planning to upgrade Kamailio to version 5.7.3 to manage some memory leaks issues. I am installing from source and came across these warnings, just wanted to be sure if they are safe to be ignored. cr_func.c: In function ‘set_next_domain_on_rule’: cr_func.c:160:2: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] pv_value_t val = {0}; ^ cr_func.c:160:2: warning: (near initialization for ‘val.rs’) [-Wmissing-braces] cr_func.c: In function ‘actually_rewrite’: cr_func.c:348:2: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] pv_value_t val = {0}; ^ cr_func.c:348:2: warning: (near initialization for ‘val.rs’) [-Wmissing-braces] cr_func.c: In function ‘ki_cr_load_user_carrier_helper’: cr_func.c:782:2: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] pv_value_t val = {0}; ^ -- LD (gcc) [M p_usrloc.so] p_usrloc.so CC (gcc) [M evrexec.so] evrexec_mod.o evrexec_mod.c:64:1: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] static evrexec_info_t _evrexec_info = {0}; ^ evrexec_mod.c:64:1: warning: (near initialization for ‘_evrexec_info.data’) [-Wmissing-braces] LD (gcc) [M evrexec.so] evrexec.so CC (gcc) [M avp.so] avp.o LD (gcc) [M avp.so] avp.so CC (gcc) [M acc_diameter.so] diam_message.o CC (gcc) [M acc_diameter.so] acc_diameter_mod.o CC (gcc) [M acc_diameter.so] diam_avp.o CC (gcc) [M acc_diameter.so] diam_tcp.o LD (gcc) [M acc_diameter.so] acc_diameter.so CC (gcc) [M dmq.so] bind_dmq.o CC (gcc) [M dmq.so] message.o CC (gcc) [M dmq.so] dmq_funcs.o dmq_funcs.c: In function ‘ki_dmq_send_message’: dmq_funcs.c:304:3: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] dmq_peer_t new_peer = {0}; ^ dmq_funcs.c:304:3: warning: (near initialization for ‘new_peer.peer_id’) [-Wmissing-braces] dmq_funcs.c: In function ‘ki_dmq_bcast_message’: dmq_funcs.c:374:3: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] dmq_peer_t new_peer = {0}; ^ dmq_funcs.c:374:3: warning: (near initialization for ‘new_peer.peer_id’) [-Wmissing-braces] CC (gcc) [M dmq.so] notification_peer.o CC (gcc) [M dmq.so] dmq.o dmq.c:61:1: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] sip_uri_t dmq_server_uri = {0}; ^ dmq.c:61:1: warning: (near initialization for ‘dmq_server_uri.user’) [-Wmissing-braces] dmq.c:67:1: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces] static sip_uri_t dmq_notification_uri = {0}; ^ dmq.c:67:1: warning: (near initialization for ‘dmq_notification_uri.user’) [-Wmissing-braces] Muhammad Danish Moosa " The core of mans' spirit comes from new experiences. "___ Christopher McCandless

2 2

Info: Issue and PR automatic management
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 27 Nov '23

27 Nov '23

Hello, during the Kamailio Development Meeting that took place in Dusseldorf earlier this month, one topic was related to administrative tasks related to project development and management, how to simplify/automatize such tasks. To reduce the work load on volunteering contributors, GitHub Actions were already used for various tasks related to project development and management (e.g., automatic builds on commits and pull requests to detect compile errors or code formatting mistakes). In Dusseldorf another task was configured to be managed with GitHub Actions, respectively the check of open issues and pull requests to evaluate the interest of submitters, developers and community users to pursue them. If there is no activity on an issue (potential bug or feature request) or a pull request, after 6 weeks it is marked with the label `stale`. After two more weeks of no activity, the issue or the pull request is marked with the label `expired` and closed. Note that any comment postpones the expire timeline, being considered that there is interest in pursuing the issue or the pull request. Requests for features were already treated in this way: if nobody commits to implement it, it can be closed after one month, but it needed manual work and many were still kept open. Potential bug reports that become very old are hard to tackle if the source code changes or new major releases are out, they might even not be valid anymore. Anyhow, this automatic operations can be reverted if there is still interest in pursuing the specific issues or pull requests. A registered developer can remove labels and reopen a closed issue or pull request. The non-registered-developer contributors have to make a comment that includes the token `/notstale` to remove the label `stale` or includes the token `/notexpired` to reopen a closed item. This new kind of automatic task management might add a little inconvenience because one has to restate the interest from time to time for those items that could not be addressed. However, considering that Kamailio is an open source collaborative project, in order to be fair for those that volunteer to spend time and resources for development of Kamailio, also the users/submitters have to stay engaged, not just report and forget about. The process to automatize tasks related to Kamailio development and administration is work in progress. Everything can be adjusted based on feedback (e.g., time lines), feel free to suggest improvements or new solutions to make things easier for everyone within the project ecosystem. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services Kamailio Advanced Training -- asipto.com

1 0

How to remove record-route and via from a forwarded call?
by Benoit Panizzon 27 Nov '23

27 Nov '23

Hi List Two Kamailio Nodes situation. Node A: Routing Instance. Node B: Registrar Instance. An invite is sent from Node A to B. Customer registered on B is 'busy' as example. B initiates Call Forwarding by adding a Diversion Header and sending the Invite back to A with a new R-URI towards the CFB destination. The Invite sent from B to A still has Node B in it's Record-Route. So all subsequent SIP messages pass via B, which is not needed and cause issue with rtpengine running on B. I attempted to remove_record_route(); when sending the call back to A, but this causes: parse_headers(): bad header field [;lr;ftag=3910078620-883101371> It looks like only the beginning of the RR header is removed leaving back a competely broken line. What is the propper was to remove a node from RR and Via routing? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

3 4

WEBRTC-to-SIP & Vice Versa
by Vishal Pai 26 Nov '23

26 Nov '23

Hello All Good Day Here I am trying to achieve something like this WSS to UDP Ext registartion which works well using https://github.com/havfo/WEBRTC-to-SIP/tree/master/etc Note here i am forwarding the registartion to asterisk pbx server and define WSS of kamailio Now for calls - Webrtc - SIP calls works - SIP - Webrtc calls not working Here I am getting the request of the call on kamailio but kamailio send 404 not found to Asterisk PBX Webrtc - Webrtc calls not working Can anyone guide me on what I am doing wrong? Thanks Vishal P

3 3

refer-to to new INVITE
by Social Boh 26 Nov '23

26 Nov '23

Hello, I'd like to know if there is a way, from Kamailio side, take the refer-to header Kamailio receive in a REFER request and create a new INVITE whit this data; then bridge the call between the originating user and the new destination user. Thank you Regards -- --- I'm SoCIaL, MayBe

3 4

Re: RADIUS - Can't use extra attributes
by Duarte Rocha 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Hello Daniel, Thanks for the reply. The extra dictionary is already included otherwise an error is thrown and Kamailio doesn't start. However, i realized my mistake now and you were right. I was checking for the extra attributes in a tcpdump and on radius server and i didn't had the dictionary configured on both of them. The extra attributes are in the packet but weren't being listed. One more question. Kamailio doesn't have a way to do a totally custom RADIUS access-request packet right? (Sorry if this opens another thread. I usually just hit reply on the mailing list and let Outlook create the e-mail, but it usually creates another thread and i'm not sure why). Thanks again. Cheers, Duarte

1 0

Re: RADIUS - Can't use extra attributes
by Duarte Rocha 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Hello Daniel, Thanks for the reply. The extra dictionary is already included otherwise an error is thrown and Kamailio doesn't start. However, i realized my mistake now and you were right. I was checking for the extra attributes in a tcpdump and on radius server and i didn't had the dictionary configured on both of them. The extra attributes are in the packet but weren't being listed. One more question. Kamailio doesn't have a way to do a totally custom RADIUS access-request packet right? (Sorry if this opens another thread. I usually just hit reply on the mailing list and let Outlook create the e-mail, but it usually creates another thread and i'm not sure why). Thanks again. Cheers, Duarte

1 0

Max-Forwards header missing in OPTIONS keep-alive messages
by Christian Schnell 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Hello, in RFC 3261 (sec. 8.1.1.6) it states about the Max-Forwards header field: > A UAC MUST insert a Max-Forwards header field into each request it originates with a value that SHOULD be 70. > > Source: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3261#section-8.1.1.6 When Kamailio sends its OPTIONS keep-alive requests (from the nathelper module I believe), Max-Forwards is missing: > OPTIONS sip:alice@example.com:61266 SIP/2.0 > Via: SIP/2.0/UDP aa.bb.cc.dd:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5124450 > From: sip:pinger@sip.example.com;tag=uloc-6550aa14-7456-2461-6390f173-5fdb4667 > To: sip:alice@example.com:61266 > Call-ID: aba25282-2ca72be1-9d1fd53(a)aa.bb.cc.dd > CSeq: 1 OPTIONS > Content-Length: 0 The user agent library I'm using (libre from baresip) rejects these requests with a "400 Bad Request" response, I looked at the sources and it denies these requests because of the missing Max-Forwards header. Of course this suffices for the keep-alive logic because all that's needed is any traffic in both directions to keep both (potential) NATs open. However you might agree that it does look a bit confusing at first, and the RFC is clear about that. So it's not a bug, but is this behavior intended? Thanks, also thanks for all the great work that has been put into Kamailio. Christian

3 3

error sending message to heplify server.
by masoud96＠mail.ru 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Hello, I have an error when sending a message to the heplify server: Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045006]: CRITICAL: {2 1395 INVITE ad25bc92-16a8-4be6-a29f-a4e4ee3a2c0c} siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045006]: ERROR: {2 1395 INVITE ad25bc92-16a8-4be6-a29f-a4e4ee3a2c0c} siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044995]: ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f21549fc5f0, len: 445, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044995]: CRITICAL: siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044995]: ERROR: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f2154948b18, len: 1511, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: CRITICAL: siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: ERROR: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044995]: ERROR: {2 28117 BYE 65297c88-0834-44ce-a4da-cfd7012c2b85} <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f2154979898, len: 485, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044995]: CRITICAL: {2 28117 BYE 65297c88-0834-44ce-a4da-cfd7012c2b85} siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044995]: ERROR: {2 28117 BYE 65297c88-0834-44ce-a4da-cfd7012c2b85} siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f21549d9c50, len: 532, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: CRITICAL: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f21549d9c80, len: 560, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: CRITICAL: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f21549d9c40, len: 529, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: CRITICAL: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044994]: ERROR: {1 1 INVITE yjaewdcbicjidajxj0td800z8ba3ta09(a)10.18.5.64} siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044996]: ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f215494b6a8, len: 823, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044996]: CRITICAL: siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044996]: ERROR: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045015]: ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f21549fc5a0, len: 507, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045015]: CRITICAL: siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045015]: ERROR: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044996]: ERROR: {2 16492 INVITE sOPq2dosBQcFpqitxVMlyLxFiuWNLZyk} <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f21549fc158, len: 1037, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044996]: CRITICAL: {2 16492 INVITE sOPq2dosBQcFpqitxVMlyLxFiuWNLZyk} siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1044996]: ERROR: {2 16492 INVITE sOPq2dosBQcFpqitxVMlyLxFiuWNLZyk} siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f2154978c18, len: 506, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: CRITICAL: siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: ERROR: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045195]: ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f2154948e00, len: 567, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045195]: CRITICAL: siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045195]: ERROR: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: ERROR: {2 6972 INVITE 8f4b30bb-01fa-462d-ab66-8b30c0f7b78e} <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f2154948fe8, len: 488, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: CRITICAL: {2 6972 INVITE 8f4b30bb-01fa-462d-ab66-8b30c0f7b78e} siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: ERROR: {2 6972 INVITE 8f4b30bb-01fa-462d-ab66-8b30c0f7b78e} siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: ERROR: <core> [core/udp_server.c:697]: udp_send(): sendto(sock, buf: 0x7f21549fc158, len: 542, 0, dst: (10.241.60.115:9060), tolen: 16) - err: Bad file descriptor (9) Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: CRITICAL: siptrace [../../core/forward.h:231]: msg_send_buffer(): udp_send failed Nov 23 15:09:59 sip1-life3 kamailio[1045009]: ERROR: siptrace [siptrace_hep.c:229]: trace_send_hep3_duplicate(): cannot send hep duplicate message version: kamailio 5.7.2 (x86_64/linux) 95629c flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 95629c compiled on 14:30:56 Nov 20 2023 with gcc 10.2.1

2 1

Hump presence mwi htable
by David VILLAUME 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Hello, I'm running presence_mwi without database. I'm looking for a way to dump the presence htable content, is there any way to perform that ? Regards [https://storage.letsignit.com/6009878cd5039f000742d6a1/generated/effects_bf…] David VILLAUME Ingénieur Voix Tel : +33 156377321 david.villaume(a)sewan.fr 2 cité Paradis - 75010 PARIS www.sewan.fr<https://cloud.letsignit.com/collect/bc/649d2ea2264803323682b26f?p=qPDZoXyim…> [https://storage.letsignit.com/6009878cd5039f000742d6a1/generated/effects_78…]<https://cloud.letsignit.com/collect/bc/649d2ea2264803323682b26f?p=qPDZoXyim…> [https://storage.letsignit.com/6009878cd5039f000742d6a1/generated/effects_13…]<https://cloud.letsignit.com/collect/bc/649d2ea2264803323682b26f?p=qPDZoXyim…> [https://storage.letsignit.com/6009878cd5039f000742d6a1/generated/effects_24…]<https://cloud.letsignit.com/collect/bc/649d2ea2264803323682b26f?p=qPDZoXyim…>

2 1

RADIUS - Can't use extra attributes
by duarterocha91＠gmail.com 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Hello all, I'm currently implementing a Kamailio with RADIUS. I want to send an Access-Request to my RADIUS server and in order to do that i'm using misc_radius module and radius_does_uri_exist() function without any arguments : "if (radius_does_uri_exist()) {" For my module configuration I have the following configurations : "modparam("misc_radius", "radius_config", "/etc/radcli/radiusclient.conf") modparam("misc_radius", "uri_extra", "Sip-Method=$rm")" From what i understand, with this config my access-request should contain the default attributes and Sip-Method Attribute but that is not happening. Only defaults attributes are included. I've tried to run Kamailio with "-ddd" flag for better debug and i only get this error : "1(176) DEBUG: misc_radius [functions.c:615]: radius_does_uri_user_host_exist(): failure". Is there any other configuration that i must do? Thanks for the help. Cheers, Duarte

2 1

Online devel meeting on matrix - 14:30 UTC, Dec 5, 2023
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Hello, we should consider an online devel meeting sometime soon to summarize what was done at (and still needs to be done after) devel meeting in Dusseldorf and plan a bit the targets for next major release (5.8 or 6.0)? If considered useful, I propose Dec 5 at 14:30UTC (15:30 Berlin/Paris/Madrid/Rome), but we can also look for other dates as well. Topics to be discussed can be added at: - https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio-wiki/blob/main/docs/devel/irc-meetings… Pull requests can be made by users without git access. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

2 1

sips to sip
by David Villasmil 24 Nov '23

24 Nov '23

Hello guys, I have this setup where one side is TLS and the other UDP. Normally this works fine, but we have this provider sending sips as the schema everywhere (from, to, rr, contacts), kamailio sends the same sips to the upstream usp freeswitch. My problem is when FS sends back a 200OK and kamailio forwards it back to the provider, the provider sends an ACK and kamailio can't match it with the dialog and doesn't know where to forward it. i think this is happening because FS when is sees SIPS is setting the contact port as 5081 instead of the usual 5080... Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

5 8

Dialog + DMQ: dlg_ontimeout() triggered on wrong node!
by Benoît Panizzon 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

Hello World! Kamailio 5.5 in use. I wonder, how I could prevent this issue. modparam("dialog", "send_bye", 1) modparam("dialog", "default_timeout", 21600) in the corresponding route: $dlg_ctx(timeout_route) = "DIALOG_TIMEOUT"; dlg_manage(); Dialog starts on Node01 and it's variables, status and timer are DMQ synced to Node02 As both nodes have the same information, I guess both arm the timeout trigger and sometimes the wrong node is more trigger friendly. If dlg_ontimeout() is triggered on Node02 then: * No Bye is send, as Node02 is not handling that Dialog. * Dialog is removed from Memory on Node02 and state synced back to Node01 * Dialog is removed from Memory on Node01 too, but NOT from database [*1] * Dialog CDR is never commited on Node01 * Call is never sent to timeout_route And subsequent in dialog messages on Node01 result in: dlg_onroute(): unable to find dialog Did I misconfigure something? Is there a way to make sure the timer is NOT triggered on the node not handling the dialogue? Shall I try by setting the default_timeout and then use a timeout_avp to set that timeout slightly lower AFTER the dialog has started? Or would this be synced to the other node too? I found out, session timer changes are not synced after an initial timer was synced, so you can not extend the session timer after setting a initial timeout. So maybe this is also true for dialog timeout? [*1] this also explains why upon restarting kamailio, the dialog suddenly is back and after timing out again, a CDR is then written with a way too long duration. -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 3

set_body() adding or replacing existing body?
by Benoit Panizzon 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

Hi I'm trying to change the lifetime timer on a KDMQ dialog message before handing it with dmq_handle_message(); if(has_body("application/json") && $fU == 'dialog') { if (jansson_get("lifetime", $rb, "$var(lifetime)")) { xlog("L_INFO", "$cfg(route): DIALOG JSON action: $var(action) state: $var(state) lifetime: $var(lifetime)\n"); $var(new_lifetime) = $var(lifetime) + 60; $var(newrb) = $rb; jansson_set("integer", "lifetime", $var(new_lifetime), "$var(newrb)"); xlog("L_INFO", "$cfg(route): DIALOG JSON NEW: $var(newrb)\n"); set_body("$var(newrb)","application/json"); msg_apply_changes(); } } dmq_handle_message(); exit; The JSON string looks good after that manipulation, it contains the updated lifetime. But dmq_handle_message() does not seem to get the body anymore. So I wonder what set_body() exactly does. Is it replacing the body or appending to it? Is there a way to crank up debug output in the dialog and/or dmq module? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 1

Kamailio v5.6.5 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.6.5 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.6, that includes fixes since the release of v5.6.4. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.6.x. Deployments running previous v5.6.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.6.5. Note that 5.6 is the second last stable branch, still officially maintained by Kamailio development team. The latest stable branch is 5.7, with v5.7.3 being release out of it. For more details about version 5.6.5 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2023/11/kamailio-v5-6-5-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services Kamailio Advanced Training -- asipto.com

1 0

Releasing v5.6.5
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.6.5 (out of branch 5.6) later this week (likely on Thursday or Friday, Nov 23/24, 2023). If anyone is aware of issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in order to have a better chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services Kamailio Advanced Training -- asipto.com

1 1

Crash on core/mem/q_malloc.c
by Igor Potjevlesch 22 Nov '23

22 Nov '23

Hello! I'm facing an issue 2/3 times a day with the following errors in the logs: Nov 22 00:09:02 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3720]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:150]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: prev. fragm. tail overwritten(c0c0c000, abcdefed)[0x7f9600b754f8:0x7f9600b75530]! Memory allocator was called from core: core/re.c:430. Fragment marked by core: db_res.c:139. Exec from core/mem/q_malloc.c:391. Nov 22 00:09:02 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3720]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:155]: qm_debug_check_frag(): BUG: qm: prev. fragm. tail overwritten [0x7f9600b75460:0x7f9600b75498] - fragment marked by tm: t_fwd.c:230 Nov 22 00:09:02 abrt-hook-ccpp: Process 3720 (kamailio) of user 0 killed by SIGABRT - ignoring (repeated crash) Do you have any idea where it could come from? I'm running Kamailio 5.6.4. Regards, Igor. -- Cet e-mail a été vérifié par le logiciel antivirus d'Avast. www.avast.com

2 2

Obsoleting unmaintained modules
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 21 Nov '23

21 Nov '23

Hello, during the Kamailio Developers Meeting 2023 in Dusseldorf that took place last week, it was proposed to obsolete modules that seem to be unmaintained and no activity about them was noticed during the past years. It is quite some overhead in packaging them and trying to keep them compiling when they have external dependencies, therefore such step should spare some resources in the future. The list (see below) was built based on the options of those present at the meeting, now we want to discuss it on the larger communities of developers and users. If you are using any of these modules or you think any of them worth keeping, reply with the names of the modules that you want to be kept. The proposed action is to relocate the obsoleted modules to a new git repository "kamailio-obsolete" to still keep some visibility to them and in the eventually of future interest on any of them, it can be reintroduced in the main repository. Next is the initial list of modules proposed to be considered obsolete: - app_java - app_lua_sr - app_mono - app_python - app_sqlang - auth_identity - call_control - db2_ldap - db2_ops - db_cassandra - db_perldvdb - dnssec - domainpolicy - h350 - mediaproxy - osp - peering - print - print_lib - pua_xmpp - ratelimit - uid_auth_db - uid_avp_db - uid_domain - uid_gflags - uid_uri_db - uri_db - xmpp - xprint Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com) twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Consultancy and Development Services Kamailio Advanced Training -- asipto.com

3 5

UAC DNS SRV timeout
by Sergiu Pojoga 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

Hi, Setup: kamailio acting as a UAC needs to register with a server whose outbound proxy is DNS SRV based only, there's no A record on the proxy's FQDN. The provider advertises two SRV records. ;; ANSWER SECTION: _sips._tcp.sip.provider.com. 10 IN SRV 10 50 5061 sip11-sip.provider.com. _sips._tcp.sip.provider.com. 10 IN SRV 15 50 5061 sip10-sip.provider.com. Everything was working fine, until the provider changed the SRV priority, putting a lower priority on the host that is actually down at the moment. In this case, sip11-sip.provider.com is DOWN and sip10-sip.provider.com is UP. Now, what's happening is Kamailio tries to REGISTER with the lower priority host, gets no reply back (TCP connection doesn't get established). It then takes 30 seconds for Kamailio to try the host with the higher priority, registering successfully. And so it goes for every re-register: failure => 30 seconds => register OK. The same happens for INVITES to the downstream: INVITE => timeout => 30 seconds => INVITE (other host 200 OK). I've tried to play with TCP and DNS params, but so far no luck: no matter what I did - it took the same 30 seconds for Kamailio to detect failure and retry the secondary host. Any suggestions will be highly appreciated. Kamailio 5.6.4 (x86_64/linux) 239d0a tcp_connection_lifetime=3604 tcp_max_connections=60 tcp_connect_timeout=10 tcp_keepalive = yes tcp_crlf_ping=yes tcp_keepcnt=3 tcp_keepidle=30 tcp_keepintvl=30 tcp_reuse_port=1 tcp_accept_no_cl=yes tcp_rd_buf_size=16384 use_dns_cache = on use_dns_failover = on dns_srv_loadbalancing = on dns_try_naptr = on dns_try_ipv6=no dns_try_naptr=no dns_use_search_list=no dns_retr_time=1 dns_retr_no=3 Thanks --Sergiu

1 0

auth_check : sip user / authentication user mismatch
by Jawaid Bazyar 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

Hi, I am trying to register an endpoint as follows: REGISTER sip:siptest.booger.net SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP X.X.X.X.76:31114;branch=z9hG4bK223420485;rport From: sip:1720XXXXXXX@siptest.booger.net;tag=962873337 To: sip:1720XXXXXXX@siptest.booger.net Call-ID: 2053687751-32761-1(a)EH.BJI.BAE.HG CSeq: 2067 REGISTER Contact: sip:1720XXXXXXX@X.X.X.X:31114;reg-id=2;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:00000000-0000-1000-8000-000B82A1C58B>" Authorization: Digest username="654fe87c-67ff-42dd-8d5e-79786a99713c", realm="siptest.booger.net", nonce="ZVaJtmVWiIrsuWc5hkzM3MUUUs8MgRFR", uri=sip:siptest.booger.net, response="119a3b6426cdcfa037bf1825b69139a5", algorithm=MD5 X-Grandstream-PBX: true Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Grandstream GXP2170 1.0.11.64 Supported: path Expires: 120 MAC: 00:0b:82:a1:c5:8b Allow: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REFER, UPDATE, MESSAGE Content-Length: 0 Note that the Authorization username differs from the To-From username. This is intentional, as I am testing use of randomly generated credential . This worked with this endpoint directly against Asterisk, for instance. However, registering against Kamailio now, I am getting: Nov 16 21:24:26 vs-rs01 /usr/sbin/kamailio[584855]: DEBUG: {1 2067 REGISTER 2053687751-32761-1(a)EH.BJI.BAE.HG} auth_db [authorize.c:503]: auth_check(): authentication username mismatch with from/to username Even though I have this set in the config: if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", 0)) { // default 1, change to 0 to skip check 0 is supposed to mean no user checks performed. I am doing this because I want to use the complex credentials for authentication, but want the endpoint to tell me the phone number in an INVITE to/from, instead of putting in the extremely long credential. Is there a way to get Kamailio to accept different SIP User ID and Authentication ID fields? Thanks, Jawaid

2 2

pv cache limit is going to be exceeded
by Ali Taher 17 Nov '23

17 Nov '23

Hello all, I'm using the following Lua script to fetch data from Redis, which is in form of list: function split(str, delimiter) for token in string.gmatch(str, "[^" .. delimiter .. "]+") do return token end end function contains(mainString, subString) return string.find(mainString, subString, 1, true) ~= nil end function longest_match_acode() local currentSeconds = os.time() local milliseconds = os.clock() * 1000 local ddate = os.date("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", currentSeconds) .. string.format(".%03d", milliseconds) KSR.xlog.xinfo("starting date:" ..ddate) local size = 0 local result local acode = "29192" local inputbcode = "4474173" local delimiter = ":" while size == 0 do local currentSeconds = os.time() acode = string.sub(acode, 1, string.len(acode) - 1) KSR.ndb_redis.redis_cmd("srvN", "LRANGE price:" .. acode .." 0 -1", "r") size = tonumber(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>size)")) end local left = 0 local right = size - 1 while left <= right do local currentSeconds = os.time() local milliseconds = os.clock() * 1000 local ddate = os.date("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", currentSeconds) .. string.format(".%03d", milliseconds) resultRight = tostring(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>value[" .. right .. "])")) resultLeft = tostring(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>value[" .. left .. "])")) local bcodeLeft = split(resultLeft, delimiter) local bcodeRight = split(resultRight, delimiter) if contains(inputbcode, bcodeRight) then KSR.xlog.xinfo("Input bcode contains bcode value from Redis: " .. resultRight .. " at index: " .. right .. " with date: " .. ddate) end if contains(inputbcode, bcodeLeft) then KSR.xlog.xinfo("Input bcode contains bcode value from Redis: " .. resultLeft .. " at index: " .. left .. " with date: " .. ddate) end left = left + 1 right = right - 1 end local currentSeconds = os.time() local milliseconds = os.clock() * 1000 local ddate = os.date("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S", currentSeconds) .. string.format(".%03d", milliseconds) KSR.xlog.xinfo("ending date:" ..ddate) end function ksr_request_route() if KSR.is_INVITE() then longest_match_acode() KSR.sl.send_reply("404", "Not found"); end end I'm getting the following warning in the log : WARNING: LUA {INVITE}: <core> [core/pvapi.c:340]: pv_cache_add(): pv cache limit is going to be exceeded - pkg memory may get filled with pv declarations I think the issue is in the following lines: resultRight = tostring(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>value[" .. right .. "])")) resultLeft = tostring(KSR.pv.get("$redis(r=>value[" .. left .. "])")) the list coming from Redis has around 30k items, which I'm iterating through using value[x] which is exhausting the pv declaration as per my understanding. How to overcome this issue? Is it possible to save the list as an array variable and then iterate through that array? Regards,

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users