- sr-users - kamailio.org

Add Header to reply on failure_route
by Benoit Panizzon 18 Sep '23

18 Sep '23

Hi List I'm attempting to add a header to a reply message on failure. Situation: Registrar => Core => (dispatcher list) => Various IC I would like to know on the registrar, which of the dispatcher groups failed. What I attempted sofar: failure_route[DISPATCH_FAILURE] { append_to_reply("X-RR: (append reply) Final Dispatch Failure $avp(dispgroup):$avp(trunkname)\r\n"); append_hf("X-RR: (append hf) Final Dispatch Failure $avp(dispgroup):$avp(trunkname)\r\n"); $avp(rstatus) = t_get_status_code(); $avp(rtext) = $T_rpl($rr); $avp(rtext) = "REMOTE REPLY: " + $T_rpl($rr); t_send_reply("$avp(rstatus)", "$avp(rtext)"); } I only get status text is getting through to my reply. I would much prefer to add a header which I could then extract on the registrar. Am I missing something which could prevent addition of a header in a reply? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 1

Multiple headers in http client request
by Matteo Brancaleoni 17 Sep '23

17 Sep '23

Hello all :) I'm struggling to add two headers to an http client request, but cannot find a proper way to do it. The headers are Authorization and Content-Type. The first try is with http_client module, beside undocumented, is possible to add multiple headers separating them with "\r\n". What I see is the correct Authorization header, and two Content-Type headers, one with my content type the other with x-www-form-urlencoded, which no one sets ? Second try is with http_async_client which supports multiple headers, but since I'm calling it from an xhttp event route, there's no transaction and request cannot be suspended, so I cannot get results before sending out xhttp response... Any hint? br, Mat

2 3

Orphan Dialog Vars: Probable cause found!
by Benoît Panizzon 15 Sep '23

15 Sep '23

Hi List I wonder if some of the devs could look at the dialog code and maybe confirm my observation of this supposed Bug in Kamailio 5.6 Situation: Two Kamailio, dialog counters synced via DMQ and each node using a local DB as dialog backend. Goal is to count channel usage per customer. modparam("dialog", "db_mode", 1 ) modparam("dialog", "enable_dmq", 1) modparam("dialog", "h_id_start", -1) # Use server_id modparam("dialog", "h_id_step", 2) modparam("dialog", "profiles_with_value", "custcallcounter") If 'JohnDoe' is involved in a call, I do: set_dlg_profile("custcallcounter","JohnDoe"); To check how many calls are busy by JohnDoe I do: get_profile_size("custcallcounter","JohnDoe","$var(channel_use)"); Picture this situation: JohnDoe is initiating a first call via Node1: Node1 created the dialogue and variables, writes them to the database and replicates the dialog vars to Node2 => IN MEMORY Nothing about the running dialog is being written to the Database on Node2, but get_profile_size returns the count on Node2. So while the first call aka dialog is running via Node1, JohnDoe is initiating a second call, this time via Node2. Node2 creates the dialog and writes this to the database. Then the profile with Name 'JohnDoe' is INCREASED on Node2. This is when I suddenly find the dialog_vars on the Node2 database containing information about the dialog started on Node1. So I guess writing to a dialog counter triggers the dialog_vars being written to the Database. When JohnDoe is ending it's first call, then the dialog and dialog_vars are cleaned out of the database on Node1, but NOT on Node2 What I fear happens next: They dialog_vars remaining on the Database of Node 2 accumulate more and more, making the database slower. When a call happens to re use the same hash id and entry, things start going really badly. Could I be right? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 0

Set a License for Kamailio
by Ali Taher 15 Sep '23

15 Sep '23

Hello, Is it possible to put a kind of license for Kamailio, in a way that it works for 1 week for example, and after that it will not process new requests? Regards,

3 4

client sending message and refresh register normal. But KSR.uac.uac_req_send() ERROR
by riffs＠sina.cn 14 Sep '23

14 Sep '23

The client uses the TLS protocol registered and TCP Connection established . There is a problem now, sending message KSR.uac.uac_req_send() from the kamilio server to client failed sometimes,and the error is as follows： “2023-09-04T17:22:01.515763+08:00 (3429) ERROR: tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): tcp_send failed 2023-09-04T17:22:01.515763+08:00 (3429) ERROR: tm [uac.c:678]: send_prepared_request_impl(): Attempt to send to precreated request failed ”. meantime, the client sending message to Kamalio server succeded, and the register status and tcp connection is normal. After 30s, obtained the $uac_req(evcode) from the event_route[uac:reply] is 408.After this error appears, all the messages sent to this client are 408. " 2023-08-29T03:48:43.738152+08:00 (3349) NOTICE: <script>: ===uac reply received, callid = 0B6ECB534AE24281AED9BBBC56B140A6`yangwang2`1693252093, code is: 408 2023-08-29T03:48:43.738825+08:00 (3349) NOTICE: <script>: ===uac reply received, callid = 0B6ECB534AE24281AED9BBBC56B140A6`yangwang2`1693252093, code is: 408 " But from other information, the TCP connection is normal. Because from Kamailio to querying this user's Location, it has not changed all day. The client sends messages is also normal. That is, the user's registration and sending messages can receive 200 OK. We use netstat commands to view the user's TCP connection information on the client and server, and the connection status is also normal.The status of the corresponding port of the TCP connection is ESTABLISHED. client: netstat -ano | findstr 49957 "172. 17. 47.125:49957 XXX.96.XXX.XXX:5061 ESTABLISHED 10516" server: "tcp 0 0 10.11.xx.xx:5061 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:49957 ESTABLISHED 3467/kamailio" This client is normal after logging in, and the problem that occurs after a period of use (maybe some hours), and once it occurs, it fails until the user creates a new connection and logs back in. Not all users will appear. Why is this the case? The socket connection is fine, but uac_req_send () get an ERROR? I found a problem from the log file. Is it caused by duplicate callids pushed to the same user at the same second? Looking forward to your answer, thank you very much Script information that may be required kamailio.cfg ： tm mode # ----- tm params ----- # auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3) # default retransmission timeout: 30sec modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30000) # default invite retransmission timeout after 1xx: 120sec modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 120000) modparam("tm", "auto_inv_100", 1) kamalio.lua uac_req_send() " --uac_req_send KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(hdrs)", hdrs) KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(method)", "MESSAGE") KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(ruri)", "sip:" .. to .. "@" .. KAM_DOMAIN) KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(furi)", "sip:" .. from .. "@" .. KAM_DOMAIN) KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(turi)", "sip:" .. to .. "@" .. KAM_DOMAIN) KSR.pv.seti("$uac_req(evroute)", 1) KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(body)", content) local ouri = (row.received ~= "" and row.received) or row.contact KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(ouri)", ouri) local callid = rows[i].clientid .. "`" .. rows[i].username .. "`" .. os.time() KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(callid)", callid) KSR.uac.uac_req_send()

1 0

MS Teams and ca_list.pem
by Social Boh 13 Sep '23

13 Sep '23

Hello, I'd like to know where i can download/search ca_list.pem file to use in tls.cfg configuration file for MS TEAMS. Without the file: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:50]: tls_err_ret(): TLS write:error:0A000086:SSL routines::certificate verify failed (sni: unknown) ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1336]: tls_h_read_f(): src addr: 52.114.76.76:506 ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1339]: tls_h_read_f(): dst addr: KamailioIP:0 ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1476]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7fb6a23ba4f8 r: 0x7fb6a23ba620 (-1) Thank you Regards -- --- I'm SoCIaL, MayBe

1 0

number based routing and NATed peers
by Kiss Zoltán 12 Sep '23

12 Sep '23

Hello, Im gathering ideas about routing based on caller number to multiple peers and -lets say- subscribers. As far as i know we can route the calls with LCR based on prefix or the whole number to the LCR gateways which are specified in the LCR module gateway table. This is working very well with public IP based "peers". We can route calls to these gateways. But what can we do if we have to route to a "peer" which is behind NAT. Basically they have to REGISTER as a subscriber, but we cannot add a subscriber to the LCR gateway table, beacuse LCR module needs a directly reachable IP address with a fixed port. Does anyone have any ideas on how to handle these mixed type peers? Or maybe we have to add the fixed IP peers which are not REGISTERing to the usrloc database somehow and then we can do a lookup location based on $rU. To make myself clear, it would be nice if we can handle those 2 types of our peers unifromly in terms of SIP routing, thats why im looking for a "unified" solution. Thanks for your suggestions. With kind regards, Zoltan

1 0

Skip/discard branch in branch route?
by Benoît Panizzon 11 Sep '23

11 Sep '23

Hi all Is there a way to skip a branch in branch route? Situation: Two registrar server with DMQ synced location database. CPE register via TCP or TLS. To properly work, message have to be sent over the existing TCP connection. Multiple CPE register to one AOR. CPE1 and CPE2 register to Registrar 1 CPE3 registers to Registrar 2 On Registrar 1 there is an established TCP connection to CPE1 and CPE2 but not to CPE3. Within the Branch Route to the CPE I can check if there is a TCP as the Branch Route is executed for every contact in that AOR: branch_route[BR_TO_CPE] { [...] $var(reg_contact_addr) = $(ulc(aor=>addr)[$T_branch_idx]{uri.host}); $var(socket) = $(ulc(aor=>socket)[$T_branch_idx]); if ($var(socket) == 0) { xlog("L_ERROR", "$cfg(route): No Socket for: $var(reg_contact_addr)"); } [...] } This log an error if the socket is not present on the local registrar. But is there a way to tell kamailio to skip/discard that contact? My intention is to parallel branch from the core to both registrars, that way all contacts would still get the call but via established TCP socket (and in case of UDP and NAT via correct know ip for ALG port-forwarding). -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

2 12

load_module(): could not find module <mi_fifo> in </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/>
by amit＠cosmicinfotech.com 08 Sep '23

08 Sep '23

using kamailio 5.3.9 [244@root ~]$ kamailio -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -E loading modules under config path: /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/ 0(1071336) ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:500]: load_module(): could not find module <mi_fifo> in </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/> 0(1071336) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3543]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 294, column 12-23: failed to load module 0(1071336) ERROR: <core> [core/modparam.c:176]: set_mod_param_regex(): No module matching <mi_fifo> found 0(1071336) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3546]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 582, column 63: Can't set module parameter ERROR: bad config file (2 errors) 0(1071336) INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not initialized please help!

2 2

Re: uac_replace_to() without RR params
by Duarte Rocha 08 Sep '23

08 Sep '23

2 1

Question about a Slow timer process.
by Володимир Іванець 07 Sep '23

07 Sep '23

Hello everyone! I'm running Kamailio 5.6.2 and having a potential problem on one of the systems. The Slow timer process slowly consumes more and more of its PKG memory. I did not allow it to use all memory by restartink Kamailio during afterhours so I'm not sure what the consequences might be. I'm suspecting that this could be caused by my configuration but not sure how exactly. Can anyone please tell me how the Slow timer process can be debugged? Is it possible to see what it is storing in the memory and what data is piling up? Thanks a lot! Regarts, Volodymyr Ivanets.

1 0

uac_replace_to() without RR params
by Duarte Rocha 07 Sep '23

07 Sep '23

Hello all, I'm currently working on a proxy where I need to change To and From headers in order to normalize the numbers to +E164. I would like to be able to restore using and $avp() or $dlg_var() and without writing parameters on the Record-Route headers. I've tried to use restore_mode in auto mode and restore_dlg parameter with value 1 but still got the parameters on the inserted Record-Route. I've tried manual mode and using the configured $avp() to restore, but the parameters still got written on the Request-URI. I thought of using restore_mode with value "none" saving original values in an $avvp() and doing the replace, however, uac_replace() on Request Route or branch routes. That way i can't replace the values of To and From in the replies. That being said, my questions are : - Is there a way to use manual or auto mode without writing info on the Record-Route and only using $avp() ? - Is there a way to make changes on the To and From header on replies? Thanks in advance, Best Regards, Duarte Rocha

1 0

[Proposal] To add tlsa module to the package builder
by Denys Pozniak 07 Sep '23

07 Sep '23

Hello! Are there any technical difficulties in adding tlsa module with the statically linked OpenSSL v1.1.1 to the package builder (deb)? -- BR, Denys Pozniak

1 0

Unnecessary/Invalid AVPs in CCR message over Ro Interface
by s.ghahremannejad＠gmail.com 06 Sep '23

06 Sep '23

**Issue Description** I'm encountering an issue with my Kamailio configuration related to the inclusion of the "Accounting-Record-Type" (480) and "Accounting-Record-Number" (485) AVPs in Credit-Control Request (CCR) messages sent from the S-CSCF to the OCS. **Issue Details** - **Problem**: The "Accounting-Record-Type" and "Accounting-Record-Number" AVPs are being added to CCR messages generated by my Kamailio instance. - **Expected Behavior**: According to modern Diameter and 3GPP standards (e.g., RFC 4006 and TS 32.299), these AVPs should not be included in CCR messages. **Configuration Details** - **Kamailio Version**: 5.3.0 - **SigScale OCS Version**: 3.2.9 Note that I have redacted some specific information for confidentiality reasons. The actual values are placed in my Kamailio main configuration file (`kamailio.cfg`) and Diameter-specific configuration files (where applicable). Kamailio.cfg: modparam("ims_charging", "db_url", DB_URL) modparam("ims_charging", "db_mode", 1) modparam("ims_charging", "origin_host", HOSTNAME); modparam("ims_charging", "origin_realm", NETWORKNAME); modparam("ims_charging", "destination_host", DESTINATION_HOST); modparam("ims_charging", "destination_realm", DESTINATION_REALM); modparam("ims_charging","service_context_id_root", RO_ROOT); modparam("ims_charging","service_context_id_ext", RO_EXT); modparam("ims_charging","service_context_id_mnc", MNC); modparam("ims_charging","service_context_id_mcc", MCC); modparam("ims_charging","interim_update_credits",30); modparam("ims_charging","timer_buffer",5); SCSCF.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <DiameterPeer FQDN="scscf.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org" Realm="ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org" Vendor_Id="10415" Product_Name="CDiameterPeer" AcceptUnknownPeers="1" DropUnknownOnDisconnect="1" Tc="30" Workers="16" QueueLength="32" TransactionTimeout="5" SessionsHashSize="128" DefaultAuthSessionTimeout="3600" MaxAuthSessionTimeout="3600" > <Peer FQDN="diameter" Realm="ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org" port="3868"/> <Peer FQDN="192.168.2.31" Realm="ocs.ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org" port="3868"/> <Acceptor port="3868" bind="eth0"/> <Auth id="16777216" vendor="10415"/> <Auth id="16777216" vendor="4491"/> <Auth id="16777216" vendor="13019"/> <Auth id="16777216" vendor="0"/> <Auth id="4" vendor="10415"/>  <Acct id="4" vendor="10415" />  <SupportedVendor vendor="10415" /> <Realm name="ocs.ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org"> <Route FQDN="192.168.2.31" metric="10"/> </Realm> <DefaultRoute FQDN="diameter" metric="10"/> </DiameterPeer> I am using SigScale OCS as my Online Charging System. Here is the error log I received from SigScale OCS: ERROR REPORT==== 5-Sep-2023::07:27:01.393554 === "DIAMETER AVP unsupported" service_name: {ocs_diameter_acct_service,{0,0,0,0},3868} capabilities: {diameter_caps, {<<"host1">>, <<"scscf-1.ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org">>}, {<<"COMPANYNAME.local">>, <<"ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org">>}, {[{0,0,0,0}],[{172,18,0,7}]}, {50386,10415}, {<<"SigScale OCS">>,<<"CDiameterPeer">>}, {[],[]}, {[10415],[10415]}, {[4,16777238],[16777216]}, {[],[]}, {[],[]}, {[{'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[16777238],[]}], [{'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[16777216],[]}, {'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',4491,[16777216],[]}, {'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',13019,[16777216],[]}, {'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[4],[]}, {'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[],[4]}]}, {[329],[]}, {[],[]}} errors: [{5001, {diameter_avp,480,undefined,true,false, <<0,0,0,2>>, 'Accounting-Record-Type',2,'Enumerated',5}}, {5001, {diameter_avp,485,undefined,true,false, <<0,0,0,0>>, 'Accounting-Record-Number',0,'Unsigned32',6}}, {5001, {diameter_avp,260,undefined,true,false, <<0,0,1,10,64,0,0,12,0,0,40,175,0,0,1,2,64,0,0,12,0,0,0,4>>, 'Vendor-Specific-Application-Id', {'3gpp_ro_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[4],[]}, 'Grouped',10}}] I would greatly appreciate it if someone from the community could provide insights into the following: 1. Possible Configurations: Are there specific configurations or modules in Kamailio that might cause the inclusion of non-standard AVPs in CCR messages? 2. IMS Ro Interface Behavior: Does anyone have experience with IMS Ro interface behavior using Kamailio that could shed light on this? If you have any guidance, suggestions, or solutions to help me troubleshoot and resolve this problem, please share them. Thank you for your assistance.

2 1

kamcmd reload is slow or blocking additional reloads
by Martin Nyström 06 Sep '23

06 Sep '23

Hello, Running ”kamcmd permissions.trustedReload” it instantly returns “Reload OK” but I cannot repeat the reload for about 8 seconds. This is the same for dialplan.reload and dispatcher.reload. root@superman.local:/# kamcmd permissions.trustedReload Reload OK root@superman.local:/# kamcmd permissions.trustedReload error: 500 - ongoing reload root@superman.local:/# kamcmd permissions.trustedReload error: 500 - ongoing reload There are scenarios where I might need to reload the permission table multiple times within this 8 second window. Is this some kind of intended block or is something at fault? modparam("db_mysql", "ping_interval", 60) modparam("db_mysql", "timeout_interval", 4) modparam("db_mysql", "auto_reconnect", 1) modparam("db_mysql", "opt_ssl_mode", 0) modparam("permissions", "db_url", "mysql://kamailio:xxxxx@aws-rds-database /kamailio") version: kamailio 5.7.1 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 10.2.1 /M

4 6

关于acc_cdr的问题，请教一下
by bikq＠163.com 05 Sep '23

05 Sep '23

目前进行一通呼叫后，在acc表中可以看到Invite、ack及bye的记录详情并带有时间，acc_cdrs表中只有start_time及end_time,是对应invite和bye的。现在我想在acc_cdrs中增加ack的时间我该如何去做呢？有没有大佬能解答一下？万分感谢！！！

1 0

Configuring package memory
by Ivan Ribakov 05 Sep '23

05 Sep '23

Is there any specific reason why shared memory can be configured via the config files ("shm_mem_size") AND CLI flags ("-m") but package memory can only be set via CLI flags ("-M")? Did no one ever came across the need to configure the package memory limit so far, or is there another way to achieve it without using the CLI flag? -- Ivan Ribakov Software Engineer www.zaleos.net

3 2

Re: Kamailio stops processing UDP on one interface
by Ihor Olkhovskyi 31 Aug '23

31 Aug '23

Bastian, According to mine stats all seems ok... # kamctl stats shmem { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [ "shmem:fragments = 330", "shmem:free_size = 1889418024", "shmem:max_used_size = 258962624", "shmem:real_used_size = 258065624", "shmem:total_size = 2147483648", "shmem:used_size = 248809096" ], "id": 212042 } pkg.stats also not showing any signs of exhausting. For me what is working is server can send packets, but not receive em back even. And it's happening only on 1 interface. Le 30/08/2023 à 21:44, Bastian Triller a écrit : > I'm asking, because we kind of observed similar behaviour after > overload. We've did some load testing and at some point SHM was > exhausted and that didn't recover itself. One process was using nearly > 100% CPU. And I guess that at least sl replies still works at that point. > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:28 PM Ihor Olkhovskyi > <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Bastian, > > I'm fine with retransmissions and so, but for me it's really > interesting, that server is not restoring it's state after a while > and only restart helps. And this is happening only with UDP on one > interface, others are working fine over UDP > > Le 30/08/2023 à 17:19, Bastian Triller a écrit : >> Maybe it's not beneficial to have a receive buffer that high. If >> your presence server is stateful, it will send retransmissions if >> packets get dropped. But it will also send retransmissions if >> your proxy does not reply fast enough. So your proxy may be >> damped by retransmissions. Did you check SHM/active transactions >> on your proxy? >> >> Regards, >> Bastian >> >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 3:56 PM Ihor Olkhovskyi >> <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> They are increasing, actually >> >> # ss -l -u -m src X.X.X.X/Y >> State Recv-Q Send-Q Local >> Address:Port Peer Address:Port >> UNCONN 25167616 0 X.X.X.X:sip *:* >> skmem:(r25167616,rb25165824,t0,tb65536,f2304,w0,o0,bl0,d514894) >> >> Le mer. 30 août 2023 à 15:04, Bastian Triller >> <bastian.triller(a)gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Are drops increasing on that socket while it is happening? >> ss -l src <local_interface> -u sport 5060 -m >> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 3:26 PM Ihor Olkhovskyi >> <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just to add some info >> >> netstat -nlp >> Active Internet connections (only servers) >> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address >> State PID/Program name >> ... >> udp 25167616 0 <local_interface>:5060 >> 0.0.0.0:* 211759/kamailio >> ... >> >> So I see a huge Receive Queue on UDP for Kamailio >> which is not clearing. >> >> Le mar. 29 août 2023 à 14:29, Ihor Olkhovskyi >> <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Hello, >> >> I've faced a bit strange issue, but a bit of >> preface. I have Kamailio as a proxy (TLS/WS <-> >> UDP) and second Kamailio as a presence server. At >> some point presence server accepts around 5K >> PUBLISH within 1 minute and sending around the >> same amount of NOTIFY to proxy Kamailio. >> >> Proxy is "transforming" protocol to TLS, but at >> sime point I'm starting to get these type of errors >> >> tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): >> tcp_send failed >> tm [t_fwd.c:1588]: t_send_branch(): sending >> request on branch 0 failed >> <script>: [RELAY] Relay to >> <sip:X.X.X.X:51571;transport=tls> failed! >> tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): >> tcp_send failed >> tm [t_fwd.c:1588]: t_send_branch(): sending >> request on branch 0 failed >> >> Some of those messages are 100% valid as client >> can go away or so. Some are not, cause I'm sure >> client is alive and connected. >> >> But the problem comes later. At some moment proxy >> Kamailio just stops accept UDP traffic on this >> interface (where it also accepts all NOTIFY's), >> at the start of the "stopping accepting" Kamailio >> sends OPTIONS via DISPATCHER but not able to >> receive 200 OK. >> >> Over TLS on the same interface all is ok. On >> other (loopback) interface UDP is being processed >> fine, so I don't suspert some limit on open files >> here. >> >> Only restart of Kamailio proxy process helps in >> this case. >> >> I've tuned net.core.rmem_max and >> net.core.rmem_default to 25 Mb, so in theory >> buffer should not be the case. >> >> Is there some internal "interface buffer" in >> Kamailio that is not freed upon failure send or >> maybe I've missed somethig? >> >> Kamailio 5.6.4 >> >> fork=yes >> children=12 >> tcp_children=12 >> >> enable_tls=yes >> >> tcp_accept_no_cl=yes >> tcp_max_connections=63536 >> tls_max_connections=63536 >> tcp_accept_aliases=no >> tcp_async=yes >> tcp_connect_timeout=10 >> tcp_conn_wq_max=63536 >> tcp_crlf_ping=yes >> tcp_delayed_ack=yes >> tcp_fd_cache=yes >> tcp_keepalive=yes >> tcp_keepcnt=3 >> tcp_keepidle=30 >> tcp_keepintvl=10 >> tcp_linger2=30 >> tcp_rd_buf_size=80000 >> tcp_send_timeout=10 >> tcp_wq_blk_size=2100 >> tcp_wq_max=10485760 >> open_files_limit=63536 >> >> Sysctl >> >> # To increase the amount of memory available for >> socket input/output queues >> net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 25165824 25165824 >> net.core.rmem_max = 25165824 >> net.core.rmem_default = 25165824 >> net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 25165824 >> net.core.wmem_max = 25165824 >> net.core.wmem_default = 65536 >> net.core.optmem_max = 25165824 >> >> # To limit the maximum number of requests queued >> to a listen socket >> net.core.somaxconn = 128 >> >> # Tells TCP to instead make decisions that would >> prefer lower latency. >> net.ipv4.tcp_low_latency=1 >> >> # Optional (it will increase performance) >> net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 1000 >> net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 128 >> >> # Flush the routing table to make changes happen >> instantly. >> net.ipv4.route.flush=1 >> -- >> Best regards, >> Ihor (Igor) >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Ihor (Igor) >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial >> Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, >> do not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do >> not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Ihor (Igor) >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not >> reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email tosr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >

1 0

Install Kamailio 5.3
by Daniel Oliveira Hilário 30 Aug '23

30 Aug '23

Hi people, I installed Kamailio 5.3 on Ubuntu Server 22 LTS, but I am not able to resolve several PHP errors that occur when I try to open the website http://localhost/siremis/. Which Linux distro and version is best suited for installation? Is Kamailio version 5.3 operational or is it better to use version 4.4? Att., Daniel Hilário INFRACOM/UFRGS 51 3308 4801

2 1

Kamailio stops processing UDP on one interface
by Ihor Olkhovskyi 30 Aug '23

30 Aug '23

Hello, I've faced a bit strange issue, but a bit of preface. I have Kamailio as a proxy (TLS/WS <-> UDP) and second Kamailio as a presence server. At some point presence server accepts around 5K PUBLISH within 1 minute and sending around the same amount of NOTIFY to proxy Kamailio. Proxy is "transforming" protocol to TLS, but at sime point I'm starting to get these type of errors tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): tcp_send failed tm [t_fwd.c:1588]: t_send_branch(): sending request on branch 0 failed <script>: [RELAY] Relay to <sip:X.X.X.X:51571;transport=tls> failed! tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): tcp_send failed tm [t_fwd.c:1588]: t_send_branch(): sending request on branch 0 failed Some of those messages are 100% valid as client can go away or so. Some are not, cause I'm sure client is alive and connected. But the problem comes later. At some moment proxy Kamailio just stops accept UDP traffic on this interface (where it also accepts all NOTIFY's), at the start of the "stopping accepting" Kamailio sends OPTIONS via DISPATCHER but not able to receive 200 OK. Over TLS on the same interface all is ok. On other (loopback) interface UDP is being processed fine, so I don't suspert some limit on open files here. Only restart of Kamailio proxy process helps in this case. I've tuned net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default to 25 Mb, so in theory buffer should not be the case. Is there some internal "interface buffer" in Kamailio that is not freed upon failure send or maybe I've missed somethig? Kamailio 5.6.4 fork=yes children=12 tcp_children=12 enable_tls=yes tcp_accept_no_cl=yes tcp_max_connections=63536 tls_max_connections=63536 tcp_accept_aliases=no tcp_async=yes tcp_connect_timeout=10 tcp_conn_wq_max=63536 tcp_crlf_ping=yes tcp_delayed_ack=yes tcp_fd_cache=yes tcp_keepalive=yes tcp_keepcnt=3 tcp_keepidle=30 tcp_keepintvl=10 tcp_linger2=30 tcp_rd_buf_size=80000 tcp_send_timeout=10 tcp_wq_blk_size=2100 tcp_wq_max=10485760 open_files_limit=63536 Sysctl # To increase the amount of memory available for socket input/output queues net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 25165824 25165824 net.core.rmem_max = 25165824 net.core.rmem_default = 25165824 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 25165824 net.core.wmem_max = 25165824 net.core.wmem_default = 65536 net.core.optmem_max = 25165824 # To limit the maximum number of requests queued to a listen socket net.core.somaxconn = 128 # Tells TCP to instead make decisions that would prefer lower latency. net.ipv4.tcp_low_latency=1 # Optional (it will increase performance) net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 1000 net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 128 # Flush the routing table to make changes happen instantly. net.ipv4.route.flush=1 -- Best regards, Ihor (Igor)

3 5

[OT] Code 868 reply to SIP OPTIONS ?
by Olivier 30 Aug '23

30 Aug '23

Hello, Have you ever seen a SIP device replying with code 868 to a SIP OPTIONS request ? Best regards

1 1

How to forward 480
by Anthony Blandin 29 Aug '23

29 Aug '23

Hello, I have a Kamailio SBC connected to another foreign SBC and to a media server. In case of non response, Kamailio SBC receives a 480 Temporarily not available from the foreign SBC and I need to forward this 480 to my media server but I don't see how to do that. The 480 arrives in the onreply_route. If I use then a failure_route, it resends the initial INVITE and not the 480. Is there a way to do that? Thanks for your help. Anthony Blandin

2 1

Re: extreme dildoes
by Angel Elena 27 Aug '23

27 Aug '23

I think is better sip over tls to extra protection xD Sent from Android device El 26 ago 2023 12:59, Julien Chavanton <jchavanton(a)gmail.com> escribió: Are you trying to connect them over SIP ? On Sat, Aug 26, 2023, 6:06 AM <feigelwang(a)uusextoy.com <mailto:feigelwang@uusextoy.com> > wrote: So, when you still are alone, buying a huge dildo is worth it. Enjoy sex with the huge realistic dildo anytime and anywhere. Not only that, the big dildo brings completely different sexual stimulation. Maybe you want to enjoy full sex, should try some other sex toys. https://www.hugedildo.com/ __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:

1 0

extreme dildoes
by feigelwang＠uusextoy.com 27 Aug '23

27 Aug '23

So, when you still are alone, buying a huge dildo is worth it. Enjoy sex with the huge realistic dildo anytime and anywhere. Not only that, the big dildo brings completely different sexual stimulation. Maybe you want to enjoy full sex, should try some other sex toys. https://www.hugedildo.com/

6 5

large dildo
by feigelwang＠uusextoy.com 26 Aug '23

26 Aug '23

Or, if you are good at Google search, I believe you can definitely find more ways to play the big dildo. All in all, huge dildos are the best sex toy for singles. For single women, it’s vaginal masturbation. For single men, it’s anal sex. https://www.hugedildo.com/

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users