- sr-users - kamailio.org

Need an error description
by satyaprakash ch 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

Hi, Can anyone help me with the error why can we get this? ERROR: tm [tm.c:1752]: _w_t_relay_to(): t_forward_noack failed ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:1081]: run_failure_handlers(): error running run_top_route for failure handler Thank you.

2 1

event_route[tm:local-response] only executes a few times
by Kaufman 10 Jul '23

10 Jul '23

Hello, I'm writing a 302 redirect server and wanting to capture some events on all replies, so I'm trying to do this in event_route[tm:local-response], but I noticed that the event route is only called a few times for the first few requests, and then never gets executed again. This is the simplest case in which I can reproduce the issue: #!KAMAILIO loadmodule "pv" loadmodule "tm" loadmodule "xlog" route { xinfo("[$rm $ci-$cs] Src:[$si:$sp] RURI:[$ru] To:[$tu] From:[$fu]\n"); t_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; } event_route[tm:local-response] { xcrit("[$rm $ci-$cs] tm:local-response replied locally\n"); } If I start Kamailio with kamailio -ddDDeE it has 8 children. If I use sipp to send 10 requests, this is what I see in the kamailio logs. The critical line in the event route is only printed four times. This is tested on 5.7.0 and 5.6.4 9(66) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 1-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:1-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 9(66) CRITICAL: <script>: [INVITE 1-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:1-14@172.26.0.3-1>] tm:local-response replied locally 10(67) INFO: <script>: [ACK 1-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:1-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 11(68) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 2-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:2-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 11(68) CRITICAL: <script>: [INVITE 2-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:2-14@172.26.0.3-1>] tm:local-response replied locally 12(69) INFO: <script>: [ACK 2-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:2-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 13(70) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 3-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:3-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 13(70) CRITICAL: <script>: [INVITE 3-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:3-14@172.26.0.3-1>] tm:local-response replied locally 14(71) INFO: <script>: [ACK 3-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:3-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 15(72) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 4-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:4-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 15(72) CRITICAL: <script>: [INVITE 4-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:4-14@172.26.0.3-1>] tm:local-response replied locally 16(73) INFO: <script>: [ACK 4-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:4-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 9(66) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 5-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:5-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 10(67) INFO: <script>: [ACK 5-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:5-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 11(68) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 6-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:6-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 12(69) INFO: <script>: [ACK 6-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:6-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 13(70) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 7-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:7-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 14(71) INFO: <script>: [ACK 7-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:7-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 15(72) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 8-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:8-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 16(73) INFO: <script>: [ACK 8-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:8-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 9(66) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 9-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:9-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 10(67) INFO: <script>: [ACK 9-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:9-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 11(68) INFO: <script>: [INVITE 10-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:10-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] 12(69) INFO: <script>: [ACK 10-14(a)172.26.0.3-1<mailto:10-14@172.26.0.3-1>] Src:[172.26.0.3:5060] RURI:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] To:[sip:service@172.26.0.2:5060] From:[sip:sipp@172.26.0.3:5060] Kaufman

2 2

Random number
by Ali Taher 07 Jul '23

07 Jul '23

Hello, As per Kamailio documentation, $RANDOM returns a random value from the [0 - 2^31) range. But when testing it it's always returning a random number of 9 or 10 digits. I'm not sure if it's always the case or if it can also returns numbers with 1 or 2 digits as well. Another question, how can I force it to return a number of specific digits starting with certain prefix. Regards,

2 1

Finding a way to gracefully restart kamailio with dialog module enabled and DMQ sync
by Benoît Panizzon 07 Jul '23

07 Jul '23

Hi Gang We are still having massive issues on how to safely reload kamailio after config changes when using the dialog module and DMQ. If there are active dialogues, kamailio corrupts them on a restart even when using MySQL as dialog backend. As we use two core nodes for redundancy, I am looking for a way to gracefully restart kamailio. I am considering adding some key in a hash table or anything else I can reload on runtime to indicate to kamailio not to accept any new calls (effectively rejecting Invites without To-Tag with 503 causing the registrar or IC peer to hopefully resend the invite to the other node). Then wait, until no more dialogues are active, so kamailio can safely be restarted. My Issue now: How can I find out, one specific node does not have any active dialogues? 'kamcmd dlg.stats_active' returns the count of all DMQ synced nodes, not of the local one. And suggestions or any other ideas how I can 'reload' the kamailio config without disrupting active dialogues? My last resort would be to look into the database: modparam("dialog", "h_id_start", -1) # Use server_id modparam("dialog", "h_id_step", 2) So odd/even H_ID should tell me the number per node. But I see a lot of orphan dialogues hanging around in the database not being cleaned so I guess that will not be reliable at all. Yes, I know I will get the question: 'Why do you need to restart kamailio that often'. We have started production on our kamailio based TSP platform. And of course, despite a LOT of testing beforehand, there is always some issue that pops up. At the moment, I have to implement a config change about once or twice a week to fix some new minor issues. I hope, somewhen in the future we will hopefully have a stable config which will last for several months, but at the moment this is the situation. -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

3 4

Randomize calling number
by Ali Taher 06 Jul '23

06 Jul '23

Hello, What is the best way to change the calling number to a random number (based on specific pattern, like number of digits for example) in an invite packet without using a database. So the scenario is : * receive an invite packet from certain source * change the calling number * send back the invite packet including the new calling number to the original source. Regards, Ali Taher

3 7

302 Handling issue in failure route
by Devang Dhandhalya 05 Jul '23

05 Jul '23

Hello All I am handling 302 response in the failure route and when receiving 302 response in kamailio, it's not going into the failure route , kamailio just executing the onreply route when 302 response are received. A few days ago the same code with failure route worked but now it does not. i dont know why kamailio is not executing a failure route from where we can redirect calls to another server. code snippet route[RELAY]{ t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY"); t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] { if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } if (t_check_status("302")){ get_redirects("*"); $ru= $T_rpl($sel(contact.uri)); route(RELAY); } } kamailio version : 5.6.4 Please suggest if I am doing anything wrong. -- Regards, *Devang Dhandhalya* -- *Disclaimer* In addition to generic Disclaimer which you have agreed on our website, any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the originator and do not necessarily represent those of the Company or its sister concerns. Any liability (in negligence, contract or otherwise) arising from any third party taking any action, or refraining from taking any action on the basis of any of the information contained in this email is hereby excluded. *Confidentiality* This communication (including any attachment/s) is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) and contains information that is PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. Unauthorized reading, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. Please inform originator if you have received it in error. *Caution for viruses, malware etc.* This communication, including any attachments, may not be free of viruses, trojans, similar or new contaminants/malware, interceptions or interference, and may not be compatible with your systems. You shall carry out virus/malware scanning on your own before opening any attachment to this e-mail. The sender of this e-mail and Company including its sister concerns shall not be liable for any damage that may incur to you as a result of viruses, incompleteness of this message, a delay in receipt of this message or any other computer problems.

3 3

SL absorbed ACK is counted as dropped by core.drop_requests
by Kaufman 03 Jul '23

03 Jul '23

Just checking to see if this is the designed behavior. The SL module will attempt to match ACKs for stateless replies and handle them (absorb them?). The question I have is that it looks as though this ACK gets counted as dropped by the core.drop_requests from the KEX module. Tested using this config: #!KAMAILIO loadmodule "pv" loadmodule "sl" loadmodule "xlog" loadmodule "kex" loadmodule "corex" loadmodule "ctl" modparam("sl", "bind_tm", 0) route { xinfo("[$ci] $rm Request. Src:[$si:$sp] RURI:[$ru] To:[$tu] From:[$fu]\n"); sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); } event_route[sl:filtered-ack] { xnotice("sl:filtered-ack ACK [$ci] to local reply absorbed\n"); } Then validate by kamcmd stats.fetch core:drop_requests Is this the designed and "correct" behavior? Kaufman

3 4

Kamailio v5.7.1 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 28 Jun '23

28 Jun '23

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.7.1 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.7, that includes fixes since the release of v5.7.0. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.7.x. Deployments running previous v5.7.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.7.1. For more details about version 5.7.1 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2023/06/kamailio-v5-7-1-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Forward Registration
by nutxase 28 Jun '23

28 Jun '23

Hi All I have setup kamailio using websockets(wss) i am trying to forward any registration that comes to kamailio to go to asterisk, so in theory kamailio is a registration proxy i have set rewritehostport("xxx.xxx.xxx[:5080](http://node3.sipalto.com:5080)"); the registration forwards fine but the contact on asterisk side shows as sip:xxx:kamailioip.xxxx.invalid so therefore asterisk sees the sip peer as offline what am i missing :( Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

1 0

Releasing v5.7.1
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 28 Jun '23

28 Jun '23

Hello, I am considering to release Kamailio v5.7.1 (out of branch 5.7) this week (likely on Wednesday or Thursday, Jun 28/29, 2023). If anyone is aware of issues not yet on the bug tracker, report them there asap in order to have a better chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

1 1

Matching the From Username in LCR rule table
by harneet singh 27 Jun '23

27 Jun '23

Hi Experts, We wished to used the LCR Module to be able to select the Gateway(s) to send the calls to based on the From(Caller) Username. Based on the LCR Documentation, the usage of other fields like request URI or prefix etc is pretty clear. But for the From Usename I am having certain trouble understanding the same. It refers to some mtree. Excerpt below: "A gateway matches a request if user part of Request-URI matches "prefix", caller URI matches "from_uri" pattern,* caller URI userpart matches mtree with "mt_value"*, and callee URI matches "request_uri" pattern in a tuple that is associated with the gateway." Can someone explain/ share a sample lcr_rule table entries for the From Username that can be matched against the incoming sip message for gw selection? Do we need to manually create an mtree by the name "*lcr*". Asking based on the below section in LCR documentation? Any pointers are highly appreciated. 3.35. mtree (string) Name of mtree to which load_gws() matches caller URI userpart. *Default value is "lcr".* Regards, Harneet Singh -- "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth" - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

2 3

uac_replace() and uac_restore debug help
by Duarte Rocha 24 Jun '23

24 Jun '23

Hello, I'm currently experiencing some odd behaviours when using these functions and I need some help debugging to find the root of the issue. I receive a call from a client and do some changes to the To and From header using auto mode with password. Encrypted info goes on the Record-Route header parameters (vsf\vst) normally. 1 - On subsequent requests sent by the originating client, domains on To and From header are different from the ones sent in the first INVITE. In this scenario, somehow the automatic modifying has errors on the end result. Can the different domains affect the end result of the automatic modifying or only the vsf\vst parameters and password are needed to the auto replace\restore? 2 - How can I decrypt the info on vsf and vst parameters in order to verify the info sent and the encryption? Cheers, Duarte Rocha

2 1

uac_restore behaviour question
by Duarte Rocha 22 Jun '23

22 Jun '23

Hello, I have some questions regarding uac_replace methods. When I receive the first INVITE from someone I change To and From using uac_replace_to() and uac_replace_from(). I do this only on first INVITES. In order to restore them I use the "auto" so the changes are restored automatically in replies or requests sent to the call originator.. In the case of subsequent requests from the originator kamailio still changes To and From without me using uac_replace functions. Is this caused by the auto restore? Does it work for both sides and is this is the intended behaviour? Cheers

1 1

How to handle 302 redirects
by Trey Ormsbee 22 Jun '23

22 Jun '23

Hello, Im having a hard time figuring out how to handle a 302 reidrect, the uac_redirect modules shows a simple configuration. However for me, what it is not doing is changing the 302 back to invite. It is sending the 302 as is on. if(!t_check_status("3[0-9][0-9]")) { exit; } get_redirects("3:1"); t_relay(); This code just relays the 302 for me. I should add I am using this with the DISPATCHER module so perhaps that has something to do with my issue. Setup is this, kamailio is sitting between to sip servers, so the flow goes like this, sip_server_a -> kamailio -> sip_server_b. sip_server_b only responds with 302 redirects, sip_server_a does not handle 302’s at all. Kamailio will only get invites from sip_server_a, and the redirects from sip_server_b will only have one contact. How can I get kamailio to reply to sip_server_a’s invite with the updated INVITE? My config is a mesh of the dispatcher example and uac_redirect example with this specific section handling the redirect: # Sample failure route failure_route[RTF_DISPATCH] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "RTF_DISPATCH: "); if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } # next DST - only for 500 or local timeout if (t_check_status("500") or (t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied())) { if(ds_next_dst()) { t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } } if (t_check_status("302")) { xlog("L_NOTICE", "RTF_DISPATCH: 302 "); if (!get_redirects("1:1")) { xlog("L_NOTICE", "RTF_DISPATCH: failed to get_redirects "); t_reply("480", "Temporarily Unavailable"); exit; } xlog("L_NOTICE", "RTF_DISPATCH: got redirects "); t_relay(“sip_server_a”,”5060”); } } Any ideas what I am doing wrong is this supported? Im expecting once I relay this message that it should be an INVITE not a 302 redirect. I cant find any examples of anyone else really doing this.

3 3

Missing posops module from 5.7 debian repo
by Patrick Karton 20 Jun '23

20 Jun '23

hello , i have installed kamailio 5.7 from debian repo http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailio57 bullseye main but i dont find the posops module in the directory modules. what is the exactly package where i can find it. Thanks.

2 5

KEMI
by iliusha.md＠gmail.com 19 Jun '23

19 Jun '23

Hello, I have the following statement: if KSR.is_method("INVITE") then KSR.log("info", "method not allowed " .. KSR.kx.get_method() .."\n"); KSR.x.exit(); end For some reason, it falls into this condition no matter which method I use, I tried OPTIONS, NOTIFY etc. log file: <core> [core/kemi.c:152]: sr_kemi_core_log(): method not allowed OPTIONS the same with this check: if KSR.is_method_in("I") then KSR.log("info", "method not allowed " .. KSR.kx.get_method() .."\n"); KSR.x.exit(); end this is the lua modparam settings: # ---- lua params ---- modparam("app_lua", "load", "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/main.lua") modparam("app_lua", "reload", 1) modparam("app_lua", "log_mode", 1) cfgengine "lua" version: kamailio 5.7.0 (x86_64/linux) 1c23c2 Any idea what I'm doing wrong?

2 1

Kamailio failover in aws/azure environment
by M Arqum CH 17 Jun '23

17 Jun '23

Hi members, I am setting up kamailio as loadbalcer for asterisk server farm with active-backup conf in Azure cloud using azure loadbalcer, for incoming it works fine external incoming traffic with nated external IP, can any one guide how to do active-backup configuration for internal traffic, as asterisk servers are running on local network. Thanks and regards Arqum

2 1

TLS errors
by nutxase 16 Jun '23

16 Jun '23

Hey All I have been setting up TLS and websocket for kamailio but i keep getting these errors in the log please can someone help me Jun 14 20:51:57 so-sbc-02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[25490]: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:51]: tls_err_ret(): TLS accept:error:1408A0C1:SSL routines:ssl3_get_client_hello:no shared cipher (sni: [sip.domain.com](http://sip.sipalto.com)) Jun 14 20:51:57 so-sbc-02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[25490]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1333]: tls_h_read_f(): src addr: 1.2.3.4.5:57265 Jun 14 20:51:57 so-sbc-02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[25490]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1336]: tls_h_read_f(): dst addr: 5.4.3.2.1:8089Jun 14 20:51:57 so-sbc-02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[25490]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1478]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f3c8fc16720 r: 0x7f3c8fc16848 (-1) my config is pretty standard so i am not sure what i am missing using letsencrypt certs #!ifdef WITH_TLS # ----- tls params ----- modparam("tls", "tls_method", "TLSv1.2+") modparam("tls", "certificate", "/etc/kamailio/tls/cert.pem") modparam("tls", "private_key", "/etc/kamailio/tls/ckey.pem") modparam("tls", "ca_list", "/etc/kamailio/tls/fullchain.pem")#!endif Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.

3 5

impossible to modify $tU twice
by David VILLAUME 15 Jun '23

15 Jun '23

Hello, I’m in a scenario where i would apply different modification to $tU to User with KEMI, but I can’t achieve it. I managed to reproduce it with legacy config : Scenario 1 (both values concatenates): route[dbg] { $tU ="aaa"; $tU ="bbb"; } To: sip:aaabbb@5.5.5.5 Scenario 1 (both values concatenates and @ disapears): route[dbg] { $tU ="aaa"; $tU=$null; $tU ="bbb"; } To: sip:aaabbb5.5.5.5 --->without @ I tried different combination with [*] as for avps without success, does anyone have an idea about how to perform it ? Regards, David

3 2

Cannot achieve rtpengine HA
by Arsenijs Kabihno 13 Jun '23

13 Jun '23

Hello, We are trying to achieve rtpengine HA solely with kamailio and rtpengine module. In the following example call goes to rtpengine node 10.5.0.183:22222 and then we stop rtpengine service on this node to simulate failure. Client is triggering re-INVITE, but, apparently, kamailio sticks to initially selected rtpengine, producing the following errors: Jun 12 06:59:48 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) INFO: {2 2 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: <null>, method:INVITE, status:200, extra_id: z9hG4bK55018600, rtpengine_answer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=priv1 direction=pub1 SIP-source-address via-branch=extra rtcp-mux-offer generate-mid DTLS=passive SDES-off ICE=force RTP/SAVPF Jun 12 06:59:49 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) NOTICE: {2 2 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} acc [acc.c:287]: acc_log_request(): ACC: transaction answered: timestamp=1686553189;method=INVITE;from_tag=fcn109nfe9;to_tag=01284cc8-bc58-4104-9629-8e6bb827d97f;call_id=jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e;code=200;reason=OK;src_user=90362;src_domain=10.181.0.1;src_ip=10.5.0.145;dst_ouser=123;dst_user=123;dst_domain=10.181.0.1 Jun 12 06:59:49 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 31(37) INFO: {2 2 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: <null>, method:INVITE, status:200, extra_id: z9hG4bK55018600, rtpengine_answer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=priv1 direction=pub1 SIP-source-address via-branch=extra rtcp-mux-offer generate-mid DTLS=passive SDES-off ICE=force RTP/SAVPF Jun 12 06:59:49 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 51(57) INFO: {1 2 ACK jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: sip:10.5.2.192:5060, method:ACK, status:<null>, extra_id: <null>, rtpengine_offer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=pub1 direction=priv1 SIP-source-address rtcp-mux-demux DTLS=off SDES-off ICE=remove RTP/AVP Jun 12 06:59:49 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 51(57) INFO: {1 2 ACK jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: sip:10.5.2.192:5060, method:ACK, status:<null>, extra_id: <null>, rtpengine_offer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=pub1 direction=priv1 SIP-source-address rtcp-mux-demux DTLS=off SDES-off ICE=remove RTP/AVP Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) INFO: {2 3 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: <null>, method:INVITE, status:200, extra_id: z9hG4bK20888040, rtpengine_answer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=priv1 direction=pub1 SIP-source-address via-branch=extra rtcp-mux-offer generate-mid DTLS=passive SDES-off ICE=force RTP/SAVPF Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 27(33) ERROR: {2 3 INVITE jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} rtpengine [rtpengine.c:3070]: send_rtpp_command(): can't send command "offer" to RTPEngine <udp:10.5.0.183:22222> Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 54(60) INFO: {1 3 ACK jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} <script>: RTPENGINE branch_id:0 ruri: sip:10.5.2.192:5060, method:ACK, status:<null>, extra_id: <null>, rtpengine_offer: replace-origin replace-session-connection SIP-source-address direction=pub1 direction=priv1 SIP-source-address rtcp-mux-demux DTLS=off SDES-off ICE=remove RTP/AVP Jun 12 07:01:26 ap07stvp.xxxxxxx.xxx docker[9373]: 54(60) ERROR: {1 3 ACK jdl9kq6fv51jcv1agk2e} rtpengine [rtpengine.c:2706]: rtpp_function_call(): no available proxies We also found Daniel answer on similar issue here: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2713#issuecomment-823138302 Please advise how it can be solved. Kind regards, Arsenijs

4 5

Carrierroute Test API?
by sr.maillists＠gmail.com 13 Jun '23

13 Jun '23

Hi List Does someone know a function to test a number against the carrierroute module, to see which route it picked? My Idea: We have multiple Kamailio-Proxies and I would like to test a number against all hosts to see where it will be routed, without performing testcalls. Regards Stefan

2 1

Kamailio/MySQL Module compatibility with MySQL 8.0+
by Pedro Ulhoa 13 Jun '23

13 Jun '23

Hello friends. I didn't find about it in the documentation, but I will need to update my database version to MySQL 8.0.32 and I'm using Kamailio version 5.4. I did some quick tests, and I only needed to adjust the user due to the authentication mode, and with that, apparently I had no problems. I would like to know if you are using Kamailio with the latest version of MySQL, if you have had any problems in production, and if it really is safe to upgrade. -- Aviso Legal: Este documento pode conter informações confidenciais e/ou privilegiadas. Se você não for o destinatário ou a pessoa autorizada a receber este documento, não deve usar, copiar ou divulgar as informações nele contidas ou tomar qualquer ação baseada nessas informações. Disclaimer: The information contained in this document may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this document is not the intended recipient, or an employee agent responsible for delivering this document to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

3 2

What is the best way to return a lot of data via JSONRPC and jansson?
by Benoit Panizzon 12 Jun '23

12 Jun '23

Hi Team To offer some diagnose functionality I created an API that returns the location list via JSONRPC But this creates huge variables. Jun 12 09:43:32 prod-cpereg02 kamailio[2174548]: ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:1491]: pv_printf_mode(): no more space for spec value - printed:0 token:8599 buffer:8192 Jun 12 09:43:32 prod-cpereg02 kamailio[2174548]: ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:1503]: pv_printf_mode(): buffer overflow -- increase the buffer size... Already hitting the default limit and not sure this is the right way to go as we will end up with thousands of registrations. What is the best way to return larger ammounts of data out of kamailio? Avoid using the JSONRPC and access the database externally? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

2 1

Dialog DMQ state after restart
by Calvin E. 10 Jun '23

10 Jun '23

Does the dialog module do anything similar to the htable dmq_init_sync behavior? The scenario is restarting the offline member of an HA pair after modifying the script. We're unsure of the state of the replicated dialogs post-restart. Will the standby become aware of the dialogs prior to the restart? In other words, do we need to wait until the pre-restart calls end before we can safely failover? -Calvin E.

5 7

Kamailio - could not allocate private memory from pkg pool
by Muhammad Danish Moosa 09 Jun '23

09 Jun '23

Hi, I have been kamailio services working for few months and suddenly I got this error. ERROR: <core> [core/kemi.c:2923]: sr_kemi_pv_sets(): unable to set pv [$rp] ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:352]: pv_cache_add(): could not allocate private memory from pkg pool ERROR: <core> [core/kemi.c:2914]: sr_kemi_pv_sets(): cannot get pv spec for [$dlg_var(BW0930526150606231188928742(a)10.10.16.100)] ERROR: <core> [core/data_lump.c:544]: dup_lump_list_r(): could not allocate private memory from pkg pool ERROR: <core> [core/data_lump.c:582]: dup_lump_list_r(): out of mem ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1759]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2501]: build_res_buf_from_sip_req(): could not allocate private memory from pkg pool ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:414]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2501]: build_res_buf_from_sip_req(): could not allocate private memory from pkg pool ERROR: tm [t_reply.c:475]: _reply_light(): response building failed WARNING: tm [t_lookup.c:1499]: t_unref(): generation of a delayed stateful reply failed Issue was fixed after the restart of kamailio. -- Muhammad Danish Moosa " The core of mans' spirit comes from new experiences. "___ Christopher McCandless

4 10

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users