- sr-users - kamailio.org

Siremis JSONRPC problem on Bullseye
by Joseph Goettgens 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

I am not sure what I have to look for and I didn't change the initial config files (except for the 666 mode for kamailio_rpc.sock). As far as Kamailio is concerned the socket files files do exist: root@deb11srv1-kamailio:/var/www/siremis-5.3.x# ls -l /run/kamailio/ insgesamt 4 srw------- 1 kamailio kamailio 0 7. Jun 11:37 kamailio_ctl -rw-r--r-- 1 kamailio kamailio 5 7. Jun 11:37 kamailio.pid prw-rw---- 1 kamailio kamailio 0 7. Jun 11:37 kamailio_rpc.fifo srw-rw-rw- 1 kamailio kamailio 0 7. Jun 11:37 kamailio_rpc.sock When I look at siremis/log/ERR.log I repeatedly get: '06/07/2022','09:43:29','ERR','ErrorHandler','socket_bind(): unable to bind address [2]: No such file or directory','' This disappears when I put the local file socket in /tmp: <UnixSockLocal name="unixsocklocal" address="/tmp/siremis_rpc.sock" timeout="3.0"/> which was probably done this way in previous versions of Siremis (before systemd private tmp config). In this case I get no error messages, but still no answers (as expected). The next step seems to get UnixSockLocal right.

2 1

MANAGE_REPLY: do_action(): bad uri: How to mirror username changes from the invite to all replies?
by Benoît Panizzon 09 Sep '22

09 Sep '22

Hey there! Kamailio is being used between CPE (customer) and IC. Towards IC we use e164 numbers Towards customers we use 'localized' numbers and also ensure that Privacy is enforced by setting usernames to 'Anonymous' if Privacy is set to id, remove unwanted header etc. I realized, that I have to apply the same translations to replies and re-invites to make sure, they do not leak unwanted information towards the customer. But when I try to set: onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] $fU,$rU,$tU within MANAGE_REPLY I get: do_action(): bad uri Just removing unwanted header works fine it looks as it's only changing the usernames that causes this issue. What would be the proper was to change usernames in replies? Is there any module which would apply the same user translations as done with the invite to all replies and re-invites? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

1 1

tls_wolfssl talk at KWO: traffic generation scripts are online
by Richard Chan 09 Sep '22

09 Sep '22

Hi sr-users, The TLS traffic generation scripts are online here: * SIP library - fork of sippy/b2bua - use main-async branch https://github.com/space88man/b2bua This branch is an async refactoring of sippy; the master branch of the repo is the regular sync+elperiodic version. * runtime UA generation scripts: https://github.com/space88man/multiuac-tester This repo contains the TLS-client transport (sippy out-of-the-box supports UDP); also gratuitously uses the match/case syntax for fun (so needs Python 3.10) * no documentation: the scripts/t_register.py and scripts/t_phone.py should give you an idea how to create UACs. The script in the talk is scripts/t_register.py - creates SIP UACs that sit in an infinite loop and do REGISTER and keepalive ('\r\n\r\n'). Disclaimer: this is not a SIP-scenario framework like SIPp; SIP messages are programmatically created using sippy; e.g., the test scenario does not need to handle RTP media so the SDP body is a hardcoded string. Regards S-P

1 0

Info: Kamailio World Conference Online 2022 - The Schedule
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 Sep '22

08 Sep '22

The schedule for Kamailio World Conference Online 2022 has been published on the event website: - https://www.kamailioworld.com The event spans over two days, September 7-8, 2022, with presentations and open discussion sessions during 12:50-17:00UTC. With the main target to share the knowledge and connect the community, the conference has presentations covering use of Kamailio for 5G services, NAT traversal and integration with RTPEngine, TLS with WolfSSL, end to end testing testing, controlling SIP message content from KEMI and resources management for scalability. It is a good balance between established and new speakers at this edition of Kamailio World Conference. There is no registration required to join the event, the sessions will be presented in a live video conferencing room streamed to YouTube KamailioWorld Channel. A text chat room will be made available for posting questions and background discussions. Book the dates in your agenda and prepare for another amazing Kamailio World Conference! Keep the eye on the event website for updates! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 5

Re: [SR-Users] SSL Offloading with AWS ELB or Google GSLB and Kamailio
by Mohammed Alarayshi 08 Sep '22

08 Sep '22

Hi Joel Did you manage to offload TLS SSL on the load balancer side ? I tested it before on AWS and the calls were working well. Wondering if this makes any issues like you said with headers ?

1 0

slow timer too slow: overflow
by Denys Pozniak 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hello! After some time, Kamailio stops processing incoming messages. slow timer too slow: overflow messages appear in the log (I suspect that the problem is related to the rtimer module) Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 2b45547f33f5203f-4091(a)10.10.10.10} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:430]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7f163b9f9010, 960) called from core: core/rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(246), module: core; Free fragment> Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 2b45547f33f5203f-4091(a)10.10.10.10} <core> [core/rvalue.c:253]: rval_new_empty(): could not allocate private memory from pkg pool Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11330]: 12(11330) WARNING: <core> [core/timer.c:936]: timer_handler(): slow timer too slow: overflow (62671 - 61648 = 1023) Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 34618af41c3866bc-16408(a)10.10.10.20} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:297]: qm_find_free(): qm_find_free(0x7f163b9f9010, 960); Free fragment not found! Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 34618af41c3866bc-16408(a)10.10.10.20} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:430]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7f163b9f9010, 960) called from core: core/rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(246), module: core; Free fragment no> Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 34618af41c3866bc-16408(a)10.10.10.20} <core> [core/rvalue.c:253]: rval_new_empty(): could not allocate private memory from pkg pool Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11330]: 12(11330) WARNING: <core> [core/timer.c:936]: timer_handler(): slow timer too slow: overflow (62671 - 61648 = 1023) Aug 29 14:19:18 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 KDMQ 1c18959d07113951-203309(a)10.10.10.30} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:297]: qm_find_free(): qm_find_free(0x7f163b9f9010, 960); Free fragment not found! Aug 29 14:19:18 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 KDMQ 1c18959d07113951-203309(a)10.10.10.30} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:430]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7f163b9f9010, 960) called from core: core/rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(246), module: core; Free fragment no> Please point me out where the source of the problem could be. version: kamailio 5.6.1 (x86_64/linux) -- BR, Denys Pozniak

2 2

Dynamic rtimer interval, transaction to replace in-memory dispatcher list
by Anton Yabchinskiy 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hello, I have two slightly related questions, and would appreciate any advice on the matter. The first one is about dynamic `rtimer` (or `timer`) intervals. In the route, called by the timer process there is a request to a neighbor service. In the response there's a set of new destinations for in-memory dispatcher list and some TTL value. And I need to adjust the timer interval based on this TTL (e.g., timer interval may be 10 min, but TTL may suggest to request destinations every 5 min since now). Also, the first call to the timer route should be at T+0, not at T+interval. As far as I can tell from `rtimer` module implementation, that's unfeasible. But maybe I'm missing something? Any suggestion on how one should implement something like this? The second one is about updating in-memory dispatcher list. After receiving and parsing new destinations in the timer route, the previous in-memory destinations must be replaced by these new destinations. The naive way of doing so would look something like: `dispatcher.reload` to clear previous list, then a series of `dispatcher.add` calls to add new destinations. But a failed `add` call may lead to wrong in-memory destinations set. As far as I understand I should start using some transaction-aware database for dispatcher destinations, and literally write a transaction. Are there any other ways to solve this?

1 0

Kamailio 5.6 rpm availability
by Riccardo Villa 03 Sep '22

03 Sep '22

Hello, I can’t find rpm packages of kamailio 5.6.x on rpm.kamailio.org, do you know if it’s planned to build them in the future? I’m available if some help/testing is needed. Thanks, Riccardo Villa -- -- NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying, or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender via e-mail.

2 1

How to hide Via and Record-Route header to external network and restore them to internal network?
by Anthony Blandin 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hi Community, I have set up a SBC with Kamailio. I am testing voice call from external network to my network and voice call from my network to external network. When I send SIP messages to external network, I want to hide Via and Record-Route headers but when I receive replies from the external network I want to restore these Via and Record-Route headers to my network. How to store and restore these headers in Kamailio configuration ? Could you help on this? Thanks Anthony Blandin

4 11

remove user param from RURI
by Maarten Ureel 02 Sep '22

02 Sep '22

Hello I have a SIP INVITE with a RURI like this: sip:31427;phone-context=stripped@IP How can I remove the phone-context parameter here? In reality it's a very long string and the next hop (an SBC) is complaining about it, but I don't need it anyway. Regards Maarten

1 0

Dispatcher module and xavp_dst
by Pyry Aaltonen 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello, I’m quite new user with kamailio (heard first time about it a year ago and joined the list yesterday) and now wondering how the xavp_dst should work. I had read from the documentation that ”The first XAVP is the current selected destination.” I use ds_select_dst with alg 13. And my kamailio version is kamailio 5.5.3 (x86_64/linux) So when my dispatcher list is like (I have also tried to differ the priority value like 10 and 1, but doesn’t make difference) 10 sip:1.2.3.4;transport=tcp 10 1 type=type1 10 sip:4.3.2.1;transport=tcp 10 1 type=type2 If one of the destinations fails (dx/ip), and it happens to be the one with higher priority or the one that just gets higher position in the dispatcher list if the prio Is equal. My xavp_$xavp(dsdst=>attrs) get null value. And, if I try to seek $(xavp(dsdst[0]=>attrs) or $(xavp(dsdst[1]=>attrs) I also got nothing. If both destinations are up with equal priority, it selects them with round-robin, and the xavp_$xavp(dsdst=>attrs) has the type value of the selected destination as expected, also the $(xavp(dsdst[0]=>attrs) or $(xavp(dsdst[1]=>attrs) contains the destinations so that the selected is 0 and the other is at position 1. The $du is updated as I expect so if one fails the other one is selected always, why the xavp_dst isn’t working same way, or am I missing something? If needed I’ll try to provide more information, Thanks already in advance -Pyry

2 4

HTTP client and HTTP/2 support
by Alex Balashov 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hi, I wasn’t able to find an answer on the list previously, nor any trail of breadcrumbs in the docs: do any of the existing HTTP client modules support HTTP/2? — Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

3 3

Disabling video rtp proxing
by mayamatakeshi 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi, I'm using rtpengine for RTP proxying with kamailio. I use it just for audio. But eventually some terminal reinvites offering video. I don't want to refuse the request but just disable RTP proxying for video as my employer has limited bandwidth and want to reserve it only for audio. So I checked the rtpengine module documentation but it seems there is no way to restrict RTP proxying to be performed only for m=audio. I tried some things like replace_body("^m=video [0-9]+", "m=video 0"); and subst_body('/^m=video [0-9]+ /m=video 0 /'); and msg_apply_changes(); but still the RTP proxying for video is set up. Any hints on how to solve this?

3 4

Intermittent delays relaying BYE (up to 1s)
by Lewis Hutchinson 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Ok so making progress but still a little confused, hopefully this forum can shed some light on this behaviour. Using the hints provided (thanks all so far) and the latency logging from the cookbook I have managed to isolate the issue down to RTPengine introducing the delay. INFO: app_python3 [apy_kemi.c:1820]: sr_apy_kemi_exec_func(): alert - action KSR.rtpengine.rtpengine_manage(...) took too long [1003089 ms] (file:(null) func:(null) line:252) What is confusing is, I don't believe this block should be being called. when the BYE is triggered, it routes to ksr_route_withindlg # handle requests within SIP dialogs if self.ksr_route_withindlg(msg)==-255 : return 1 from within the ksr_route_withindlg a check is done to see if any RTPengine work needs doing # Handle requests within SIP dialogs def ksr_route_withindlg(self, msg): if KSR.siputils.has_totag()<0 : return 1 # RTPEngine handling for UPDATES & reINVITES with sdp if self.ksr_route_rtpengine(msg) == -255: return 1 RTPengine is configured in a way to step in whenever there is an SDP present based on Content-Type: application/sdp # RTPengine handle anything with SDP def ksr_route_rtpengine(self, msg): if KSR.textops.has_body_type("application/sdp"): KSR.rtpengine.rtpengine_manage( "RTP/AVP replace-session-connection replace-origin ICE=remove") return 1 What I can understand is why is this being called and erroring introducing the delay when there is no Content-Type: application/sdp in a BYE ??? As a quick fix I have put this in which stops the problem (I am sure there is better ways to handle this but for now this works in a DEV environment) def ksr_route_rtpengine(self, msg): if KSR.is_BYE(): return 1 if KSR.textops.has_body_type("application/sdp"): KSR.rtpengine.rtpengine_manage( "RTP/AVP replace-session-connection replace-origin ICE=remove") return 1 Can anyone see why this would occur? Why is sr_apy_kemi_exec_func(): alert - action KSR.rtpengine.rtpengine_manage(...) even being called for this BYE ? when there is no Content-Type: application/sdp Lewis

2 3

Manual Siremis
by -Luís Fernando- 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hello, Is there a Siremis Manual, that explain how to configure a SIP Trunk, a sip route, etc.. Thank you

2 1

Websockets Configuration
by Mahmood Alkhalil 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi, I'm trying to configure kamailio to register users over websockets, but i am not able to find any working configuration around, am new to kamailio. as far as i understand now, xhttp will handle the HTTP GET requests, i am not sure how to configure xhttp port number, cannot find parameters in the module manual, i found multiple sample configs but none of them is working, am using JsSip client. if someone can guide me with a link to a working config and that i can start from.

2 4

app_python module load error in 5.6
by Stefan-Cristian Mititelu 30 Aug '22

30 Aug '22

Hello, I am trying to load app_python.so module in kamailio 5.6 and I am getting the following error, under debian bullseye: ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:573]: load_module(): could not open module </usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_python.so>: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_python.so: undefined symbol: LOG_ The app_python.so file exists, under that path. Same ERROR for app_python3.so. I have tried updating some modules's Makefile LDFLAGS but didn't work so far; still searching. Any ideas? Thank you, Stefan

2 3

Core variable with from userinfo value of sip uri
by Denys Pozniak 30 Aug '22

30 Aug '22

Hello! It was accidentally noticed that the variable $fU gets the user part of userinfo SIP URI (although it is logical and described in the document RFC2543). I got message below and my spam filter based on $fU passed it inside the network, as $fU was test From: <sip:test:test@1.1.1.1>;tag=123456 Sure I can filter it through a regular expression, but maybe it's worth adding another core variable with the userinfo value? SIP-URL = "sip:" [ userinfo "@" ] hostport url-parameters [ headers ] userinfo = user [ ":" password ] -- BR, Denys Pozniak

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio Trunk authentication
by Keshav Kaushik 29 Aug '22

29 Aug '22

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio Trunk authentication
by Henning Westerholt 29 Aug '22

29 Aug '22

Hello, For non-commercial support please address our sr-users list (added to CC). Please look at the uac module, there a function uac_auth() for this particular scenario with example cfg. https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.5.x/modules/uac.html#uac.f.uac_auth Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/> From: Keshav Kaushik <kdkaushik(a)gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 1:34 PM To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)gilawa.com> Subject: kamailio Trunk authentication Respected Sir, I am new to kamailio so not very familiar with config PV’s and transformations etc. I have successfully authenticated the Twilio SIP phone via ACL. But I also willing to authenticate the Twilio SIP via username and password. For doing this I plan to modify the “proxy-authentication” header as blow: if (is_present_hf("Proxy-Authorization")) { $nonc=$sel(proxy-authorization.nonce);// not working $has="kamailio:$ar:SdE-----------ADVpa"; $ha1=$(has{s.md5}); hat="$aa:$adu"; $ha2=$(hat{s.md5}); $resp="$HA1:$nonc:$HA2"; append_hf('Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="kamailio", realm="$ar", nonce="$nonc", uri="sip:+1650ZZZZZZ@XX.YY.7.195", response="$(resp{s.md5})"'); } remove_hf("Proxy-Authorization");// remove original header When I save the config file and restart kamailio, it does not start, may be due to some error in code. Can you please help in authentication of a SIP trunk using user/passowrd. Thanks in advance Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows

2 1

Intermittent delays relaying BYE (up to 1s)
by Lewis Hutchinson 26 Aug '22

26 Aug '22

Thanks Alex and Kaufman, As you said there is an element of db blocking for accounting, but I don't see the same impact when the INVITE goes through and sets the accounting flags. I will look to disable accounting and see if it improves things. If not, I will have a look at benchmark to try and pin it down. It is not causing any noticeable delay in the clearing down of the call to the end users but I want to try and optimise the cleardown if possible. Once I have tested this I will report back. Thanks for your assistance. Lewis

3 2

Intermittent delays relaying BYE (up to 1s)
by Lewis Hutchinson 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

I have a situation where I am seeing intermittently Kamailio having delays when relaying the BYE received from an external party This is only affecting the BYE We have 6 Kamailios stood up 3 linked to the SIP Providers (SBC) 3 for Registration (REG) Language KEMI | Python version: kamailio 5.5.1 (x86_64/linux) 278772-dirty flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 278772 -dirty compiled with gcc 9.3.0 Simplified Flow PSTN >>>> Kamailio SBC >>>> FREESWITCH >>>> Kamailio REG >>>> SIP DEVICE SIP DEVICE >>>> Kamailio REG >>>> FREESWITCH >>>> Kamailio SBC >>>> PSTN This happens on all of them intermittently when receiving the BYE from either a SIP trunk or a SIP Device Publicly, it can take upto 1s to pass this onto the next hope (Freeswitch) on the local network. All BYEs passed between the local network relay in fractions of a second. All BYEs passed out of the KAMAILIO SBC or KAMAILIO REG to their respective public enpoints relay in fractions of a second but BYEs received from public on advertised address take upto 1s for Kamailio to process and relay. i.e PSTN >>> BYE >>>> KAMAILIO SBC (kamailio will sometimes take upto 1 second to relay this on to other kit on the internal solution. Freeswitch etc) SIP DEVICE >>> BYE >>>> KAMAILIO REG (kamailio will sometimes take upto 1 second to relay this on to other kit on the internal solution. Freeswitch etc) I am basing these timings on SNgrep and PCAP traces from homer. Does anyone have any hints and tips on how I can debug this issue. I have enabled debug logging and replicated the issue but it doesn't show anything from what I can see as to why there is delays. Thanks in advance lewis

3 2

JSON-RPC dgram_socket just part of the output
by Ilie Soltanici 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

Hello, I'm trying to get the dispatcher status from kamailio through the UDP datagram but for some reason, it is getting just part of the output. Is there any buffer that I have to increase to get the complete output? command used: ``` echo '{"jsonrpc": "2.0", "method": "dispatcher.list", "reply_name": "kamailio_reply_fifo", "id": 1}' | nc -u 192.168.1.1 8090 ``` kamailio related config: modparam("jsonrpcs", "fifo_name", "/tmp/kamailio_request.fifo") modparam("jsonrpcs", "transport", 6) modparam("jsonrpcs", "fifo_mode", 0600) modparam("jsonrpcs", "fifo_user", "kamailio") modparam("jsonrpcs", "dgram_socket", "udp:MY_INTERNAL_IP_ADDR:8090") modparam("jsonrpcs", "dgram_timeout", 2000) modparam("jsonrpcs", "pretty_format", 1) output: [image: image.png] Thanks

2 4

Kamailio 5.3 call forwarding
by Derek OSS 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

Hi, I'm using Kamailio 5.3 and I am interested in doing call forwarding. I am interested in having a user "alice" bypass the SIP REGISTER step and have their SIP INVITE request/call forwarded to another SIP user "bob" (who, let's just say for now is within the same domain, so accessible by the same SCSCF and if it makes things simpler, let's say that bob went through the register step). In the PCSCF configuration, I've tried doing something like this: route { route(TEST) ... } route[TEST] { $ru = "sip:bob@domain.com" if (!t_relay("scscf.domain.com",6060)) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } Instead of $ru, I've also tried using uac_replace_to, providing both the To and URI fields with Bob's SIP URI. When I try using the $ru, the S-CSCF still seems to use Alice's R-URI instead of Bob's. When I try using uac_replace_to, I get a 403 error saying that I need to register with the S-CSCF first. Am I going about this the correct way? Thank you. Derek

2 1

TLSA module compile errors
by Koray Vatansever 23 Aug '22

23 Aug '22

Hi everyone, I'm trying to build tlsa module on redhat 7.9 server. But I'm encountering the following compile errors. Any ideas on how I can deal with this? CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_util.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_domain.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_locking.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_rand.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_map.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_cfg.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_select.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_dump_vf.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_init.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_bio.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_config.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_server.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_rpc.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_ct_wrq.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tlsa_mod.o CC (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tls_verify.o LD (gcc) [M tlsa.so] tlsa.so /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libz.a(deflate.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against hidden symbol `_length_code' can not be used when making a shared object /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libz.a(inflate.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against hidden symbol `zcfree' can not be used when making a shared object /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libz.a(inftrees.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libz.a(trees.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against hidden symbol `_length_code' can not be used when making a shared object /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libz.a(zutil.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libz.a(crc32.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.8.5/../../../../lib64/libz.a(inffast.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: tlsa.so: version node not found for symbol SSLeay_version(a)OPENSSL_1.0.1 /usr/bin/ld: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [tlsa.so] Error 1 make[1]: *** [modules] Error 1

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users