- sr-users - kamailio.org

Branch 5.6 has been created
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 May '22

05 May '22

Hello, the branch 5.6 has been created, to be used for releasing v5.6.x series. To check out this branch, the following commands can be used: git clone https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio kamailio-5.6 cd kamailio-5.6 git checkout -b 5.6 origin/5.6 Pushing commits in this branch: git push origin 5.6:5.6 Note that 5.6 is an official stable branch, so only bug fixes, missing kemi exports (discuss on sr-dev if not sure) or improvements to documentation or helper tools can be pushed to this branch. As usual, if there is a bug fixed, commit and push first to master branch and then cherry pick to 5.5 branch: git cherry-pick -x COMMITID In few weeks, the first release from branch 5.6 will be out, respectively Kamailio v5.6.0. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - Online * https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/

1 0

Development for v5.6.x is frozen
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 May '22

05 May '22

Hello, the formal notification that the development for the next major version 5.6.0 is now frozen. The focus has to be on testing the master branch. Also, the master branch should not get commits with new features till the branch 5.6 is created, expected to happen in 2-4 weeks, a matter of how testing goes on. Meanwhile, the commits with new features in the C code can be pushed to personal branches, new pull requests can still be done, but they will be merged after branching 5.6. Can still be done commits with documentation improvements, enhancements to related tools (e.g., kamctl, kamcmd), merging exiting pull requests at this moment, exporting missing KEMI functions and completing the functionality of the new modules added for 5.6. Once the branch 5.6 is created, new features can be pushed again to master branch as usual. From that moment, the v5.6.0 should be out very soon, time used for further testing but also preparing the release of packages. If someone is not sure if a commit brings a new feature, just make a pull request and it can be discussed there on github portal or via sr-dev mailing list. A summary of what is new in upcoming 5.6 is going to be built at: * https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/features/new-in-5.6.x Upgrade guidelines will be collected at: * https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/upgrade/5.5.x-to-5.6.0 Everyone is more than welcome to contribute to the above wiki pages, especially to the upgrade guidelines, to help everyone else during the migration process from v5.5.x to 5.6.x. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 2

unexpected error log when KSR.xhttp.xhttp_reply(404...)
by hanxiaofang 05 May '22

05 May '22

Hello Kamailio community kamailio v5.5.4 debian10 Lua Scripting Routing: listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:5060 tcp_accept_no_cl=yes loadmodule "xhttp.so" loadmodule "app_lua.so" modparam("app_lua", "load", "/etc/kamailio/kamailio.lua") cfgengine "lua" function ksr_xhttp_event() KSR.set_reply_no_connect() KSR.set_reply_close() KSR.xhttp.xhttp_reply(404, "Not Found", "text/plain", "Not Found") end curl http://127.0.0.1:5060 -vvv * Expire in 0 ms for 6 (transfer 0x555d93fd9fb0) * Trying 127.0.0.1... * TCP_NODELAY set * Expire in 200 ms for 4 (transfer 0x555d93fd9fb0) * Connected to 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) port 5060 (#0) > GET / HTTP/1.1 > Host: 127.0.0.1:5060 > User-Agent: curl/7.64.0 > Accept: */* > < HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found < Sia: SIP/2.0/TCP 127.0.0.1:54944 < Content-Type: text/plain < Server: kamailio (5.4.4 (x86_64/linux)) < Content-Length: 9 < * Connection #0 to host 127.0.0.1 left intact The output of curl is OK, but have some unexpected error in kamailio.log ERROR: <core> [core/parser/parse_fline.c:271]: parse_first_line(): parse_first_line: bad message (offset: 16) ERROR: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:681]: parse_msg(): ERROR: parse_msg: message=<HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found#015#012Sia: SIP/2.0/TCP 127.0.0.1:54946#015#012Content-Type: text/plain#015#012Server: kamailio (5.4.4 (x86_64/linux))#015#012Content-Length: 9#015#012#015#012Not Found> ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:3235]: build_sip_msg_from_buf(): parsing failed now change to Native Scripting Routing: listen=tcp:127.0.0.1:5060 tcp_accept_no_cl=yes loadmodule "xhttp.so" event_route[xhttp:request] { set_reply_close(); set_reply_no_connect(); xhttp_reply("404", "Not Found", "text/plain", "Not Found"); exit; } curl http://127.0.0.1:5060 -vvv everything is ok. here is the Navite config file: http://220.231.180.131:12296/kam/native/ here is the Lua config file: http://220.231.180.131:12296/kam/kemi/ hanxiaofang

1 0

sanity_reply not available from sanity module
by Patrick Karton 04 May '22

04 May '22

Hello , the sanity_reply function from sanity is not available in kamailio script so i get an error when i want to use it. in the module source i see this static cmd_export_t cmds[] = { {"sanity_check", (cmd_function)w_sanity_check, 0, 0, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE|ONREPLY_ROUTE}, {"sanity_check", (cmd_function)w_sanity_check, 1, fixup_igp_null, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE|ONREPLY_ROUTE}, {"sanity_check", (cmd_function)w_sanity_check, 2, fixup_igp_igp, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE|ONREPLY_ROUTE}, {"sanity_check", (cmd_function)w_sanity_reply, 0, 0, 0, REQUEST_ROUTE|ONREPLY_ROUTE}, {"bind_sanity", (cmd_function)bind_sanity, 0, 0, 0, 0 }, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0} }; why is sanity_check linked again in w_sanity_reply ? is this an error ? i want to setup specific responses for some errors and let the default ones from module work as usual. Thanks.

2 2

FAILEDOVER ROUTING WITH DNS SRV Records
by Patrick Karton 04 May '22

04 May '22

Hello, im using kamaliio 5.5.3 and I want to do failedover routing with DNS SRV Records. in my lab i have these SRV records ;; ANSWER SECTION: voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. 5 IN SRV 0 33 5060 100-68-7-74.voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. 5 IN SRV 0 33 5060 100-68-7-75.voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. 5 IN SRV 0 33 5060 100-68-7-76.voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: 100-68-7-76.voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. 5 IN A 100.68.7.76 100-68-7-75.voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. 5 IN A 100.68.7.75 100-68-7-74.voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local. 5 IN A 100.68.7.74 my config script use_dns_cache=on use_dns_failover=on dns_srv_lb=on $du = "voip.oov-obs-tools-dev.svc.cluster.local"; t_relay(); after t_relay() is called the INVITE is send to one the 3 ips corresponding to fqdn but if the first ip does not send response. the two others ips are not tried. what i want is that all the ips resolved are tried until one succeeds. is there something to do to achieve that ? do i need to interact with failure route to try next ips ? Thanks for help. version: kamailio 5.5.3 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 10.2.1

2 1

function 'sl_send_reply' is not available
by David Villasmil 04 May '22

04 May '22

Hello guys, I'm starting to try KEMI and i already hit a snag... right now i'm simply testing with: loadmodule "app_lua.so" modparam("app_lua", "load", "/etc/kamailio/myscript.lua") cfgengine "lua" route { lua_run("send_reply"); } But i'm always getting: 0(118) ERROR: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1633]: sr_kemi_lua_modf(): function 'sl_send_reply' is not available I'm guessing that function is not exported by the module.. if that's the case, how can i use it? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

2 3

Dispatcher SRV load balancing
by Nicolas Chapleau 03 May '22

03 May '22

Just having a hard time trying to see if the Dispatcher module does LB when SRV records are used as the destination. Will the destinations be picked based on the SRV list or will it simply use the first name received? Read lots of docs, but can't seem to figure it out Thanks, Nic.

1 0

Problem with Record-Route in Public to Private Network
by Carlos Escalona 03 May '22

03 May '22

Hello! I wish everyone who reads this message a good day. I would appreciate some guidance with the configuration of my Kamailio. Initially, I have the following architecture: Endpoints <----Public IP----> Kamailio (listen PrivateIP advertise PublicIP) <----Private IP----> Asterisk CONFIG: https://gist.github.com/Carlos-Escalona94/3a289af05b05c69ae563ab29c9ec4710 In general, calls initiated from outside the system work perfectly, but I have a problem with calls initiated from Asterisk. According to what I was able to investigate and understand, the problem arises from the fact that Kamailio uses the public IP for the entire routing system that involves the Record-Route and Route Headers. This in turn causes Asterisk to get lost trying to send messages outside of the INITIAL INVITE transaction, for example, the ACK response to the 200 Ok received from the Endpoint since it tries to use Kamailio's public IP to which Asterisk doesn't have access. I tried to force Asterisk to send all messages to Kamailio's private IP regardless of their nature, but it doesn't seem like an appropriate solution. On the other hand, I tried to modify the architecture a bit so that it was something similar to this: Endpoints <---- Public IP----> Kamailio (listen PrivateIP:P1 advertise PublicIP) <---- PrivateIP-----> Kamailio (listen PrivateIP:P2) <---- PrivateIP ----> Asterisk CONFIG: https://gist.github.com/Carlos-Escalona94/4d681bb189c6190941d291965e123889 It seems to me that this would solve the problem, but I have two doubts about this architecture, the first is that I would like to know if there is an easier way to solve the problem that I am not considering, and on the other hand, I have not found a way to identify from which interface is receiving the message to perform the routing properly. Thanks for the attention. -- *Esta mensagem pode conter informação confidencial ou privilegiada, sendo seu sigilo protegido por lei. Se você não for o destinatário ou a pessoa autorizada a receber esta mensagem, não pode usar, copiar ou divulgar as informações nela contidas ou tomar qualquer ação baseada nessas informações. Se você recebeu esta mensagem por engano, por favor, avise imediatamente ao remetente, respondendo o e-mail e em seguida apague-a. Agradecemos sua cooperação. ** * *This message may contain confidential or privileged information and its confidentiality is protected by law. If you are not the addressed or authorized person to receive this message, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on it or any information herein. If you have received this message by mistake, please advise the sender immediately by replying the e-mail and then deleting it. Thank you for your cooperation. *

3 2

Getting "uac.reg_add" to work (documentation unclarities)
by Rick van Rein 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hello, I am trying to make UAC register with a SIP telco. But when I run... shell$ kamctl rpc uac.reg_add mydomain.com 0123456789 myteldomain.com 0123456789 sip6.telco.nl telcoreseller.nl 999999 secretpw . udp:sip6.telco.nl 360 0 10 'udp:[fd8:9::10]:5090' ...it gives me the cryptic response... ERROR: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_mod.c:666]: jsonrpc_scan(): field is not a string - type 3 The module docs only give "..." as example of attributes. And, according to... http://www.kamailio.net/docs/modules/5.4.x/modules/uac.html#uac.r.uac.reg_a… https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/5.4.4/src/modules/uac/uac_reg.c#1… ...it also seems to be behind on diff_expires, timer_expires, reg_init. What I am missing is the format, and in some cases the purpose of attributes. Could you help me to an example, perhaps based on the command I am trying? Thanks, -Rick P.S. It's been years since I worked with OpenSIPS. It feels like Kamailio is friendlier, and easier to use.

3 4

Dispatcher Usage and change of $rU
by Benoît Panizzon 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hi Gang I have a observation which I don't understand... Let's assume we have an inbound $rU = 12345 And I want to change $rU outbound to 0012345 Doing: $rU = "0012345"; ds_select_dst("2000"),"6"); route(RELAY) The call is being sent out with unaltered R-URI Username: 12345 Doing: $rU = "0012345"; ds_select_domain("2000", "6"); route(RELAY); The call is being sent out with the intended new R-URI Username: 0012345 Looking at the docs: https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.4.x/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.… I can not figure out, why I see this difference. -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

3 3

Incorrect Socket and Tcpconn-Id with Mid-Registrar and WebSockets
by Grant Bagdasarian 29 Apr '22

29 Apr '22

Hi, We're attempting to implement a mid-registrar for websocket connections but are running into some issues where the tcpconn-id and socket attributes are not stored correctly in memory (usrloc). REGISTER Flow: UA1 -> P1 (Mid-Registrar) ~> P2 (Core Proxy/Registrar) INVITE Flow: UA2 -> P2 -> P1 -> UA1 UA1: baresip cli connecting to P1 using websockets UA2: softphone Everything is running locally on a dev machine, and we're using Docker to launch P1 and P2. The below code snippet is what we use on P1, and has been simplified. The general idea is as following: 1) UA1 sets up the websocket connection and sends a REGISTER request to P1 2) P1 checks if this request has already been sent to P2 2.a) If not, then relay the request to P2. Upon receiving a 200 OK from P2 we save the registration in usrloc 2.b) If so, then absorb the request (save) and generate a reply 3) UA2 tries to call UA1 via P1 and P2 The problem occurs at 2.a since the REGISTER request is forwarded using UDP and the 200 OK is also received using UDP. When the registration is stored in reply route, the Socket (udp:x.x.x.x:xxxx) and Tcpconn-Id (-1) are not set to what we would prefer (see Output 1) TCP was also tried as the transport between P1 and P2. Upon receiving the reply from P2 the Tcpconn-Id and Socket of the connection between P1 and P2 was saved in the binding. When 2.b occurs the Socket and Tcpconn-Id are set to the correct values (see Output 2) Making a call when the binding state is at 2.a we receive the following error: "TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found" Making a call when the binding state is at 2.b works perfectly fine since the correct Tcpconn-Id is set. We did find a solution, or rather a workaround to this issue: 1) Always call the save function in request_route 2) If P2 responds with an error (non-200 OK) use the unregister function to remove the binding We also tried the tcpops tcp_set_otcpid and tcp_set_otcpid_flag functions after lookup, but this didn't do anything. KEMI Script def ksr_request_route(self, msg): if kemi.is_REGISTER(): aor = "aor" if result := kemi.htable.sht_is_null("registrations", aor) == 1: kemi.tm.t_on_reply("ksr_register_reply_route") kemi.dispatcher.ds_select_dst(1, 4) kemi.tm.t_relay() return 1 kemi.registrar.save("registrations", 1) return 1 if kemi.is_INVITE(): aor = "aor" if result := kemi.registrar.lookup_uri("registrations", aor): kemi.tm.t_relay() return 1 def ksr_register_reply_route(self, msg): if kemi.tm.t_check_status("200") == 1: kemi.registrar.save("registrations", 1) aor = "aor" kemi.htable.sht_sets("registrations", aor, "") return 1 Output 1: Binding state when request is being forwarded kamcmd ul.dump { Domains: { Domain: { Domain: registrations Size: 1024 AoRs: { Info: { AoR: grant(a)127.0.0.1 HashID: 409622189 Contacts: { Contact: { Address: sip:grant-0x7fe915a79138@172.16.99.12:9;transport=ws Expires: 13 Q: 1.000000 Call-ID: 7cdfbf93f23bb54f CSeq: 34818 User-Agent: n/a Received: sip:192.168.80.1:62184;transport=ws Path: [not set] State: CS_NEW Flags: 1 CFlags: 20 Socket: udp:10.2.0.15:5060 Methods: -1 Ruid: uloc-626a80d3-46-1 Instance: <urn:uuid:c67df38d-d5e0-e834-1d98-a8df2d3f291b> Reg-Id: 0 Server-Id: 0 Tcpconn-Id: -1 Keepalive: 0 Last-Keepalive: 1651146965 KA-Roundtrip: 0 Last-Modified: 1651146965 } } } } Stats: { Records: 1 Max-Slots: 1 } } } } kamcmd core.tcp_list { id: 1 type: WS state: CONN_OK timeout: 2 lifetime: 120 ref_count: 2 src_ip: 192.168.80.1 src_port: 62184 dst_ip: 192.168.80.15 dst_port: 80 } kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { 1: ws:192.168.80.1:62184 -> ws:192.168.80.15:80 (state: OPEN, last used 3s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } } Output 2: Binding state when request is being absorbed kamcmd ul.dump { Domains: { Domain: { Domain: registrations Size: 1024 AoRs: { Info: { AoR: grant(a)127.0.0.1 HashID: 409622189 Contacts: { Contact: { Address: sip:grant-0x7fe915a79138@172.16.99.12:9;transport=ws Expires: 9 Q: 1.000000 Call-ID: 7cdfbf93f23bb54f CSeq: 34819 User-Agent: baresip v2.0.2 (x86_64/darwin) Received: sip:192.168.80.1:62184;transport=ws Path: [not set] State: CS_NEW Flags: 1 CFlags: 20 Socket: tcp:192.168.80.15:80 Methods: 5087 Ruid: uloc-626a80d3-46-1 Instance: <urn:uuid:c67df38d-d5e0-e834-1d98-a8df2d3f291b> Reg-Id: 0 Server-Id: 0 Tcpconn-Id: 1 Keepalive: 0 Last-Keepalive: 1651146979 KA-Roundtrip: 0 Last-Modified: 1651146979 } } } } Stats: { Records: 1 Max-Slots: 1 } } } } kamcmd core.tcp_list { id: 1 type: WS state: CONN_OK timeout: 3 lifetime: 120 ref_count: 2 src_ip: 192.168.80.1 src_port: 62184 dst_ip: 192.168.80.15 dst_port: 80 } kamcmd ws.dump { connections: { 1: ws:192.168.80.1:62184 -> ws:192.168.80.15:80 (state: OPEN, last used 1s ago, sub-protocol: sip) } info: { wscounter: 1 truncated: no } }

1 0

TOPOS, 183 (before a 200OK) and SIP INFO
by Giovanni Tommasini 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Hi kamailiers, I ask your help for a strange situation with topos, 183 (before a 200OK) and SIP INFO My topology is kamailio in front of asterisks; so kamailio has 2 interfaces (1Public to talk with customers and carriers and 1 Private to talk with asterisk). In the image: - the first column is the customer - the second is the public interface of kamailio - the third is the private interface of kamaiio - the fourth is asterisk As you can see in the image, the customer send an INVITE and the carrier give back the IVR messages in a 183 (before a 200OK) asking for an IVR selection. The customer (configured to use SIP INFO) types a key and sends in INFO, but as you can see kamailio sends the INFO to himself to private interface instead of sending it to asterisk as if the contact that handled topos contained incorrect information. [image: Schermata 2022-04-26 alle 19.40.32.png] - If the customer is configured with a RFC2833 - or if the IVR messages is not in a 183 but is sent after a 200OK - or if I disabe TOPOS *all works fine* I used kamailio 5.5.3, I also try to upgrade to 5.5.4 but nothing change Maybe could be connected with https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2344 https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1077 Could be a kamailio bug for this particular situation or am I getting lost in a glass of water? thanks a lot cheers Giovanni Tommasini *evoseed s.r.l.* phone: +39 340 11 28 800 mail: giovanni.tommasini(a)evoseed.io site: evoseed.io address: Via Lucrezio 13, Trieste Italy

3 4

Kamailio functionality clarification - call forwarding no replay (call is ringing but not answered)
by Pavel Veselovsky 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Hallo all, I would need help with Kamailio. I hope, you can give me some hints. I would like use Kamailio for CFNRy feature call forward no replay, i.e. - call is forked to multiple destination - 180 is received, call is ringing, but not answered, no 200 OK is received from destinations - after predefined time (CFNRy timer), the specific branch has to be rerouted to another destination Expected behaviour is described in this flow: [image: image.png] My current behavior: - Kamailio TM module is involved for parallel forking ( https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#:~:text=1.-,Ov… ) - all branches are CANCEL-ed, it is not possible send CANCEL just to one specific branch [image: image.png] My questions: - is it possible to CANCEL just specific branch of parallel forked calls? - is it possible start timer just for specific branch? - do you think is it possible implement this feature with Kamailio? Thanks a lot in advance for any comments. Pavel.

3 2

t_check_trans failed on ACK
by Linux Vince 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

I am using Kamailio as registrar and proxy for underlying asterisk server. I am able to call but ACK on 200 OK respond from client phones are not validating transaction and thus not relaying correctly. Below are my Invites and 200 OK responses. Invite from Asterisk to Kamailio INVITE sip:31313004@rigel.com:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 65.20.69.72:5060 ;rport;branch=z9hG4bKd6ffff9d46ceb899c245ece204e51c87 From: "R31313005 N31313005" <sip:31313005@65.20.69.72:5060 ;user=phone>;tag=GR52RWG346-34 To: "31313004(a)rigel.com" <sip:31313004@rigel.com:5060> Call-ID: 1558172022-144148450000000029280449(a)65.20.69.72 CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:65.20.69.72:5060> max-forwards: 70 Allow: PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE, MESSAGE, ACK, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 228 v=0 o=Clarent 155866 155867 IN IP4 65.20.69.72 s=Clarent CallManager c=IN IP4 65.20.69.72 t=0 0 m=audio 45168 RTP/AVP 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 Invite from Kamailio to Phone INVITE sip:31313004@65.20.67.118;lhst=180.211.119.50:25759;lm=midreg SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:65.20.67.118;lr;ftag=GR52RWG346-34> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 65.20.67.118;branch=z9hG4bK6cc3.dad7580d3e28f55cbb749dbb82f0c9eb.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 65.20.69.72:5060 ;received=65.20.69.72;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKd6ffff9d46ceb899c245ece204e51c87 From: "R31313005 N31313005" <sip:31313005@65.20.69.72:5060 ;user=phone>;tag=GR52RWG346-34 To: "31313004(a)rigel.com" <sip:31313004@rigel.com:5060> Call-ID: 1558172022-144148450000000029280449(a)65.20.69.72 CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:65.20.69.72:5060> max-forwards: 69 Allow: PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE, MESSAGE, ACK, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 228 v=0 o=Clarent 155866 155867 IN IP4 65.20.69.72 s=Clarent CallManager c=IN IP4 65.20.69.72 t=0 0 m=audio 45168 RTP/AVP 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 200 OK from Phone to Kamailio SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 65.20.67.118;received=65.20.67.118;branch=z9hG4bK6cc3.dad7580d3e28f55cbb749dbb82f0c9eb.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 65.20.69.72:5060 ;rport=5060;received=65.20.69.72;branch=z9hG4bKd6ffff9d46ceb899c245ece204e51c87 Record-Route: <sip:65.20.67.118;lr;ftag=GR52RWG346-34> Call-ID: 1558172022-144148450000000029280449(a)65.20.69.72 From: "R31313005 N31313005" <sip:31313005@65.20.69.72 ;user=phone>;tag=GR52RWG346-34 To: "31313004(a)rigel.com" <sip:31313004@rigel.com >;tag=4ecc1f21f1544fd783965f27ff6d95d2 CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Contact: <sip:31313004@180.211.119.50:57935;ob> Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 322 v=0 o=- 3860150297 3860150298 IN IP4 180.211.119.50 s=pjmedia b=AS:84 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 4016 RTP/AVP 0 101 c=IN IP4 180.211.119.50 b=TIAS:64000 a=rtcp:4017 IN IP4 180.211.119.50 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ssrc:1461220511 cname:3b657c275d2a43f6 200 OK from kamailio to asterisk SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 65.20.69.72:5060 ;rport=5060;received=65.20.69.72;branch=z9hG4bKd6ffff9d46ceb899c245ece204e51c87 Record-Route: <sip:65.20.67.118;lr;ftag=GR52RWG346-34> Call-ID: 1558172022-144148450000000029280449(a)65.20.69.72 From: "R31313005 N31313005" <sip:31313005@65.20.69.72 ;user=phone>;tag=GR52RWG346-34 To: "31313004(a)rigel.com" <sip:31313004@rigel.com >;tag=4ecc1f21f1544fd783965f27ff6d95d2 CSeq: 1 INVITE Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Contact: <sip:31313004@180.211.119.50:57935;ob> Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 322 v=0 o=- 3860150297 3860150298 IN IP4 180.211.119.50 s=pjmedia b=AS:84 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 4016 RTP/AVP 0 101 c=IN IP4 180.211.119.50 b=TIAS:64000 a=rtcp:4017 IN IP4 180.211.119.50 a=sendrecv a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=ssrc:1461220511 cname:3b657c275d2a43f6 ACK from phone to Kamailio ACK sip:31313004@180.211.119.50:57935;ob SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 65.20.69.72:5060 ;rport;branch=z9hG4bK111270de2729ade9e048afa0f9fbb8df Route: <sip:65.20.67.118;lr;ftag=GR52RWG346-34> From: "R31313005 N31313005" <sip:31313005@65.20.69.72:5060 ;user=phone>;tag=GR52RWG346-34 To: "31313004(a)rigel.com" <sip:31313004@rigel.com >;tag=4ecc1f21f1544fd783965f27ff6d95d2 Call-ID: 1558172022-144148450000000029280449(a)65.20.69.72 CSeq: 1 ACK Contact: <sip:65.20.69.72:5060> max-forwards: 70 Allow: PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE, MESSAGE, ACK, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, INFO, BYE, CANCEL, INVITE This ACK is failing on transaction check and not routing correctly to phone. Any help? Thanks

2 3

Modify session name in SDP
by ZZ Wave 28 Apr '22

28 Apr '22

Hello. Kamailio 5.2.1, Debian 10. I need to change session name (s=) in SDP before relaying it to next hop, and for unknown reason I can't do it with virtually any TEXTOPS function, everything replace*, subst*, *body*... For example this from TEXTOPS documentation: subst_body('/^s=(.*)/s=root/') just before 'final' t_relay(). Either Kamailio just adds "s=root" to SDP leaving first "s=" intact, or adds just "root", or does nothing. Also I've tried msg_apply_changes() before and after these manipulations, still no result. Is it possible to make this in Kamailio without source code modification?

1 0

High performance
by Muborakshohi Masoud 27 Apr '22

27 Apr '22

Hello! I have kamailio 5.5 configured with digest authentication. DB Mysql, 2 rtpengine one on the same server with kamailio, the other is separate. Rtpengins work in bridge mode, internal/external/external-ipV6. Kamailio listen 3 address: internal/external/external-ipV6 work in mixed mode: ipV4-ipV4, ipV4-ipV6, ipV6-ipV6. OS Debian 10, CPU 1 core, Ram 4gb, Disk not ssd. internal address is used for the gateway model of the connection to the PSTN. Before sending a call to PSTN, a request is sent to Billing by Diameter (request over the network, ims_charging ), Billing responds in the region of 10-17 milliseconds. usrloc db_mode = 0; UAS contacts are received according to the PUSH scheme (we send PUSH via http and get a REGISTER). children = 8 for each; When running synthetic tests with sipp, I get 36 cps as a maximum, but there are a lot of retrans. This is a test environment. Product: I plan to get 100 cps; 20k concurrent calls, hardware will be 128GB RAM ddr4-2400; Intel Xeon Silver 4216, Optane SSD. 2 such servers, kamailio/rtpengine are configured exactly according to the scheme of the test environment. Question: Can you please tell me how many children, shm/pv do I need? Is it worth going in the direction of asynchrony, or is the standard one enough for my purpose? I will be very glad for any help. Thank you! -- Отправлено из Mail.ru для Android

2 1

Intermittent error seen when using a python script in kamailio
by Wojciech Kopciewicz 27 Apr '22

27 Apr '22

Hi, Intermittently we are observing the following error when checking if given header is present in SIP INVITE: SystemError: returned a result with an error set The complete stack trace is (some names redacted): 11(28) ERROR: {1 195 INVITE nMHZDN.10nOIDt4ldOwz5cqz0XnMepA9} app_python3 [python_support.c:156]: python_handle_exception(): apy_exec: modify_headers((null)): Unhandled exception in the Python code: TypeError: an integer is required (got type NoneType) The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/etc/kamailio/kamailio.py", line 25, in modify_headers self.modify_header("SomeHeader") File "/etc/kamailio/kamailio.py", line 29, in modify_header present = KSR.hdr.is_present(header_name) SystemError: returned a result with an error set Kamailio version (kamailio -v output): version: kamailio 5.4.6 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 8.3.0 Operation system: Linux kamailio-5c7484c74d-vhhr8 5.4.0-1056-azure #58~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 23:14:18 UTC 2021 x86_64 GNU/Linux Are you able to help me find the root cause of this issue? Pozdrawiam / Best regards, Wojtek -- *For more information on how and why we collect your personal information, please visit our Privacy Policy <https://www.motorolasolutions.com/en_us/about/privacy-policy.html?elqTrackI…>.*

3 9

LCR issues (request_uri)
by Antoine DEBARRE 26 Apr '22

26 Apr '22

Hi, I'm trying to use LCR with kamailio v5.5.4 gw, rule and rule_target are stored on mysql. for lcr rules, do you know if prefix is mandatory ? I first wanted to start using request_uri instead and leave the prefix column null/empty because prefix seems not to support regexp, I don't want to add the same rule with different prefixes. but I'm facing issues my database is fulfilled with : lcr_gw +----+--------+--------------+---------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+-------------+-------+---------+ | id | lcr_id | gw_name | ip_addr | hostname | port | params | uri_scheme | transport | strip | prefix | tag | flags | defunct | +----+--------+--------------+---------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+-------------+-------+---------+ | 1 | 1 | carrier1 | 10.78.51.3 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | fd=carrier1 | 0 | NULL | | 2 | 1 | carrier2 | 10.78.51.3 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | fd=carrier2 | 0 | NULL | | 3 | 1 | carrier3 | 10.192.50.212 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 6 | 1 | carrier4 | 10.192.50.3 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | fd=carrier4 | 0 | NULL | | 10 | 1 | carrier5 | 10.192.50.3 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | fd=carrier5 | 0 | NULL | | 18 | 1 | carrier6 | 10.192.50.214 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 20 | 1 | carrier7 | 10.192.50.210 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 30 | 1 | carrier8 | 10.192.50.211 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 31 | 1 | carrier9 | 10.192.50.216 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 32 | 2 | media1 | 10.192.50.232 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 33 | 2 | media2 | 10.192.50.233 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 34 | 2 | media3 | 10.192.50.234 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 35 | 2 | media4 | 10.192.50.235 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 36 | 2 | media5 | 10.192.50.240 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 37 | 2 | media6 | 10.192.50.241 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 38 | 2 | media7 | 10.192.50.242 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | NULL | | 39 | 3 | xivo-231 | 10.192.50.231 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | NULL | cps=5;cc=50 | 0 | NULL | +----+--------+--------------+---------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+-------------+-------+---------+ lcr_rule +----+------------------------+-----------------------------------+------------------+--------+----------+-----------+---------+---------+ | id | desc | request_uri | lcr_id | prefix | from_uri | mt_tvalue | stopper | enabled | +----+------------------------+-----------------------------------+------------------+--------+----------+-----------+---------+---------+ | 1 | Default | .+ | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | 1 | | 2 | France GSM | (0|(|00|\+)33)[67]\d{8} | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1 | 1 | | 3 | France | (0|(|00|\+)33)[1-59]\d{8} | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1 | 1 | | 4 | International default | (00|\+)[1-9].+ | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1 | 1 | | 5 | Italy | (00|\+)39.+ | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1 | 1 | | 14 | to_oldmedias | .+ | 2 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 0 | 1 | +----+------------------------+-----------------------------------+-------------------+--------+----------+-----------+---------+---------+ lcr_rule_target +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ | id | lcr_id | rule_id | gw_id | priority | weight | +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ | 25 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | | 26 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 2 | 1 | | 28 | 1 | 3 | 30 | 3 | 1 | | 29 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 4 | 1 | | 30 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | | 31 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 3 | 1 | | 32 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 1 | 1 | | 33 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 1 | 1 | | 34 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | 35 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | | 37 | 2 | 14 | 32 | 1 | 1 | | 38 | 2 | 14 | 33 | 1 | 1 | | 39 | 2 | 14 | 34 | 1 | 1 | | 40 | 2 | 14 | 35 | 1 | 1 | | 41 | 2 | 14 | 36 | 1 | 1 | | 42 | 2 | 14 | 37 | 1 | 1 | | 43 | 2 | 14 | 38 | 1 | 1 | | 45 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 1 | +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ to test gws, I use kamcmd for example : kamcmd lcr.load_gws 1 s:0600000001 s:02111111111 s:0600000001 arg 1 : prefix or $rU arg 2 : from_uri arg 3 : request_uri result is OK with 5 gateways selected but in real test situation with the following config file : kamailio.cfg : request_route { ... if(!load_gws(1,$rU,$fU)) { sl_send_reply("500", "Cannot load gateways"); exit; } ## - dumping the list of lcr gateways $var(i) = 0; while( $(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)]) != $null) { xlog("L_ERR","loaded gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]=’$(avp(lcr_gw_uri)[$var(i)])’\n"); $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } if(!next_gw()) { sl_send_reply("503", "No gateways found"); exit; } } ..... => we receive a 503 "No gateways found", which indicate that load_gws() is OK, but wasn't able to parse avp lcr_gw_uri (we have no xlog output) Then I noticed that some calls are OK and others are KO (with same pattern for $rU) => lcr rule id 2 So I with debug=3 *call to 0611111111 => load_gws OK and next_gw OK* lcr [lcr_mod.c:3018]: do_from_gw(): request did not come from gw lcr [lcr_mod.c:3018]: do_from_gw(): request did not come from gw lcr [lcr_mod.c:3004]: do_from_gw(): request game from gw lcr [lcr_mod.c:3009]: do_from_gw(): added tag_avp <cps=5;cc=50> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2264]: ki_load_gws_furi(): load_gws(1, 0611111111, 0211111111) lcr [lcr_mod.c:2313]: ki_load_gws_furi(): from uri <0211111111> did not match to from regex <AMD> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2349]: ki_load_gws_furi(): request uri < sip:0611111111@10.192.50.227:5060> did not match to request regex <(00|\+)39.+> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2349]: ki_load_gws_furi(): request uri < sip:0611111111@10.192.50.227:5060> did not match to request regex <(00|\+)[1-9].+> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2349]: ki_load_gws_furi(): request uri < sip:0611111111@10.192.50.227:5060> did not match to request regex <(0|(|00|\+)33)[1-59]\d{8}> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2369]: ki_load_gws_furi(): added matched_gws[0]=[4, 0, 3, 2329862] lcr [lcr_mod.c:2369]: ki_load_gws_furi(): added matched_gws[1]=[5, 0, 1, 5553909] lcr [lcr_mod.c:2369]: ki_load_gws_furi(): added matched_gws[2]=[8, 0, 3, 7256660] lcr [lcr_mod.c:2369]: ki_load_gws_furi(): added matched_gws[3]=[7, 0, 2, 3129551] lcr [lcr_mod.c:2369]: ki_load_gws_furi(): added matched_gws[4]=[6, 0, 4, 2234577] lcr [lcr_mod.c:2085]: add_gws_into_avps(): added gw_uri_avp <6|sip:|0|||3543318538||5060||;transport=udp|0|2> with weight <2234577> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2085]: add_gws_into_avps(): added gw_uri_avp <4|sip:|0||fd=carrier5|53657610||5060||;transport=udp|0|2> with weight <2329862> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2085]: add_gws_into_avps(): added gw_uri_avp <8|sip:|0|||3593650186||5060||;transport=udp|0|2> with weight <7256660> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2085]: add_gws_into_avps(): added gw_uri_avp <7|sip:|0|||3560095754||5060||;transport=udp|0|2> with weight <3129551> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2085]: add_gws_into_avps(): added gw_uri_avp <5|sip:|0|||3526541322||5060||;transport=udp|0|2> with weight <5553909> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2610]: generate_uris(): r_uri <sip:0611111111@10.192.50.210:5060;transport=udp>, dst_uri <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2904]: ki_next_gw(): added ruri_user_avp <0611111111> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2950]: ki_next_gw(): added tag_avp <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2965]: ki_next_gw(): added defunct_gw_avp <3526541322> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2610]: generate_uris(): r_uri <sip:0611111111@10.192.50.212:5060;transport=udp>, dst_uri <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2950]: ki_next_gw(): added tag_avp <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2965]: ki_next_gw(): added defunct_gw_avp <3560095754> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2610]: generate_uris(): r_uri <sip:0611111111@10.192.50.214:5060;transport=udp>, dst_uri <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2950]: ki_next_gw(): added tag_avp <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2965]: ki_next_gw(): added defunct_gw_avp <3593650186> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2610]: generate_uris(): r_uri <sip:0611111111@10.192.50.3:5060;transport=udp>, dst_uri <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2950]: ki_next_gw(): added tag_avp <fd=carrier5> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2965]: ki_next_gw(): added defunct_gw_avp <53657610> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2610]: generate_uris(): r_uri <sip:0611111111@10.192.50.211:5060;transport=udp>, dst_uri <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2950]: ki_next_gw(): added tag_avp <> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2965]: ki_next_gw(): added defunct_gw_avp <3543318538> the right gws are selected and call are routed to them *call to 0600000001 => load_gws OK and next_gw KO* lcr [lcr_mod.c:3018]: do_from_gw(): request did not come from gw lcr [lcr_mod.c:3018]: do_from_gw(): request did not come from gw lcr [lcr_mod.c:3004]: do_from_gw(): request game from gw lcr [lcr_mod.c:3009]: do_from_gw(): added tag_avp <cps=5;cc=50> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2264]: ki_load_gws_furi(): load_gws(1, 0600000001, 0211111111) lcr [lcr_mod.c:2313]: ki_load_gws_furi(): from uri <0170619309> did not match to from regex <AMD> lcr [lcr_mod.c:2349]: ki_load_gws_furi(): request uri < sip:0600000001@10.192.50.227:5060> did not match to request regex <(00|\+)39.+> the process stops after trying to match rule with regexp <(00|\+)39.+> Don't know if it's a bug or if I misunderstood something ! Thanks in advance ! Best regards, -- <https://app.livestorm.co/comdata-group/metaverse-what-will-cx-look-like-in-…>

3 8

Local Registration Cache
by Linux Vince 26 Apr '22

26 Apr '22

Hello, I am trying to implement scenario described in this thread by Daniel-Constantin Mierla. I am able to cache registration using save but i am not able to handle unregistration. Unregister function of registrar module is not available in onreply routes and I cannot unregister until upstream registrar returns 200 OK on Expire 0 message. Is there any workaround to fix this? Thanks,

3 5

SSL errors with websocket clients
by Vinicius Kwiecien Ruoso 22 Apr '22

22 Apr '22

Hi all! How are you? I have a kamailio instance and some users are having issues connecting via websocket using TLS. The logs show SSLv3 errors. Cannot find why that error would show up if SSLv2/3 is not enabled. Double checked it via SSLLabs that only TLSv1.2 is allowed in the service. Error sample: ``` 15(36) ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): TLS accept:error:14094416:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate unknown 15(36) ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1512]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7fafc8768190 r: 0x7fafc8768278 (-1) ``` This instance has close to 400 websocket connections opened during the day. I have a high log level enabled. I was not able to identify any reason why this happens. The certificate is a Letsencrypt certificate. The issue is that sometimes clients have a hard time connecting to the websocket and that maybe related. Below are a few more details about the config. Please let me know if you have any pointers on how to debug those connection issues. 8<----- TLS config: modparam("tls", "tls_method", "TLSv1.2+") modparam("tls", "verify_certificate", 0) modparam("tls", "require_certificate", 0) modparam("tls", "low_mem_threshold1", 0) modparam("tls", "low_mem_threshold2", 0) modparam("tls", "private_key", "/etc/certs/tls.key") modparam("tls", "certificate", "/etc/certs/tls.crt") version: kamailio 5.3.9 (x86_64/linux) 8<----- This is related to the issue https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3085 (as pointed out it is not a problem in Kamailio code). Thanks, Vinicius

2 2

How to disable video in invite with both audio and video
by Simone de Blasiis 22 Apr '22

22 Apr '22

Hello to everyone, we have a Kamailio 5.5 + RTPEngine deployment. Some devices will send an invite with both audio and video in the offer and we are trying to disable the video portion of the invite by either setting the video port to 0 or by setting a=inactive in the video portion of the SDP packet. We know that sdpops has a function that would be able to remove the video portion but it violates standards so we can't use it. We need to disable the video in the SDP offers because one of the pstn providers we are using doesn't accept invites that contain a video offer. I've spent days searching but I can't find an obvious way of achieving this. We were originally doing it with textops but we've been having some issues where the sdp wouldn't be modified correctly in reinvites after the original call is in place so we're looking for alternatives. Can someone please help us? Thanks in advance Simone de Blasiis

3 4

DMQ sync issue between 5.4 and 5.5
by David Villasmil 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

Hello guys, We have a cluster of about 10 kamilios 5.4 with several million htable records. Restarting any server is not a problem, CPU goes ip for a second but everything comes back down to normal. We added a 5.5 by mistake and it won't start, it'll just eat up memory until it bails out with qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x149dd5ebb000, 16016) called from tm: h_table.c: build_cell(334), module: tm; Free fragment not found! Is there any known issue between DMQ 5.4 and 5.5? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

1 1

"Re: TOPOS (5.1.[23]) breaks PRACK"
by Simone de Blasiis 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

Hello, we noticed the exact behaviour on Kamailio 5.5.4 and topos. If we disable topos the UPDATE messages are being recognized as loose in the WITHINDLG route and everything works. When topos is enabled the UPDATE messages fail the loose_route() check and even if we force the record_route() the message is still not being forwarded. I had just posted my own thread here <https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2022-April/114710.html> because I didn't see this one. I'll proceed opening an issue on GitHub so we can track this. Best regards Simone

1 1

Re: [SR-Users] TOPOS (5.1.[23]) breaks PRACK
by Simone de Blasiis 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

Hello, we noticed the exact behaviour on Kamailio 5.5.4 and topos. If we disable topos the UPDATE messages are being recognized as loose in the WITHINDLG route and everything works. When topos is enabled the UPDATE messages fail the loose_route() check and even if we force the record_route() the message is still not being forwarded. I had just posted my own thread here <https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2022-April/114710.html> because I didn't see this one. I'll proceed opening an issue on GitHub so we can track this. Best regards Simone

1 0

Problems with topos and UPDATE messages
by Simone de Blasiis 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

Hello to everyone, we are experiencing some issues with UPDATE messages being sent by the PSTN after an early media announcement. To reproduce the issue I have to call a specific number that has an early media announcement, since it's a paid phone number it has to announce how much it would cost before picking up the call. In this initial part the call is being negotiated in g711a. As soon as the announcement ends, the PSTN sends an UPDATE message containing the new desidered codec from the callee which is g729. At this moment Kamailio doesn't route the UPDATE message to the destination and it actually replies with a 404 message. I've attached a pcap with anonymized IPs to make it harder for bots. Here is a legend for the IPs: - - 12.34.123.123 is Kamailio - 62.23.19.74 is the PSTN - 1.2.130.40 is the client making the call I found a similar report <https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2659> in the GitHub issues of the repository and we tried forcing the record_route() as suggested but, as the OP reported in his last message, it's not working. As soon as we disable topos, the UPDATE message is correctly relayed to the caller. In the documentation we can't find anything that could give us a hint on what's happening. Does anyone have any idea on what could be happening? Thanks in advance Simone

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users