- sr-users - kamailio.org

vscode-kamailio-syntax - issue with empty comment line
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 01 Dec '20

01 Dec '20

Thanks for the link. One issue I've noticed: If you have an empty comment line (just # on a single line), then the next line is wrongly highlighted as comments. For example: # loadmodule "db_postgres.so" > i'm using https://github.com/miconda/vscode-kamailio-syntax in VScode. > its great! This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

2 4

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] kamailio SIP and RTP proxy
by Henning Westerholt 01 Dec '20

01 Dec '20

Hi Patrick, better to contact our sr-users list with the usage related questions, added to CC. Have a look to the SDP of the SIP packets to see if it contains the correct IP would be one idea to debug this further. Feel free to ask again on sr-users after you have got more details. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/> From: sr-dev <sr-dev-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Patrick Leybag Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 6:26 AM To: sr-dev(a)lists.kamailio.org Subject: [sr-dev] kamailio SIP and RTP proxy Hi, Can someone help me? I self host a kamailio using my raspberry pi as a load balancer for my two asterisk servers and get a did number. when I call to my DID number it points to my kamailio and kamailio will distribute to asterisk server but the call has no audio. I tried port forwarding ports 5060 for SIP and 10000-20000 for RTP but it still does not work. Any help is much appreciated. Thank you in advance

1 0

Kamailio Failover
by Rolly Casuga Jr. 01 Dec '20

01 Dec '20

Hi, I am having a problem on fail overing my master kamailio server and slave kamailio server. I use kamailio as a load balancer for my asterisk servers. And it is working with calls, but when I added failover with keepalived to the slave, there is no audio during calls. Thank you, Rolly

2 1

Kamailio behind HAProxy
by Joey Golan 01 Dec '20

01 Dec '20

Hello, I have a kamailio server running behind HAProxy with proxy protocol v2 enabled. In Kamailio I have set the parameter tcp_accept_haproxy=yes and loaded tcpops module. UEs are registered using TLS and kamailio sees that the message has received from their real ip address + port and not HAProxy ip + port. When UE A calls UE B, kamailio is trying to reach UE B using his real ip address and port instead of HAProxy IP address + port. I know I can get the tcp ip and port of HAProxy using $tcp(c_si) and $tcp(c_sp) but I can’t make it work. What is the right way to do this? How should I use these variables properly in order to establish the call successfully? Thanks, Joey.

6 14

core dump error when running under docker
by Carlos Vicente 30 Nov '20

30 Nov '20

Greetings, I'm having a "fun" time trying to run Kamailio inside a Docker container. It keeps failing with: 0(238) DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/pkg.c:108]: pkg_print_manager(): pkg - using memory manager: q_malloc 0(238) DEBUG: <core> [core/mem/shm.c:300]: shm_print_manager(): shm - using memory manager: q_malloc Illegal instruction (core dumped) Unfortunately the core dump is nowhere to be found. I have tried to follow the instructions at: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/tutorials/troubleshooting/coredumpfile but that hasn't helped. The environment is as follows: * Host hardware: Raspberry Pi 4 (4G memory) * Host OS: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS * Docker version 19.03.13 * Docker base image: arm32v7/ubuntu root@2ef8a21534fa:/# kamailio -v version: kamailio 5.3.2 (arm/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 9.2.1 The config file passes the syntax check: kamailio -c -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg and, the most interesting part, if I run Kamailio on the host machine, _with the exact same config file_, it runs fine. I'd appreciate any clues you may have. Thanks. cv

4 10

What is the lifecycle of Branch Flag (setbflag)
by me.projects＠yahoo.com 30 Nov '20

30 Nov '20

Hi, What is the lifecycle of Branch Flag? If its set in Request Route will it be available till end of Dialog or It will be available during Transaction only ? Thanks

3 5

[Mod: CDP] TCP Zero Window Error
by Hamid Hashmi 27 Nov '20

27 Nov '20

Dear Users I have been facing a diameter peer disconnection issue between I-CSCF and HSS. after taking traces on both sides, I saw a lot of TCP Zero Window packets from HSS towards I-CSCF and after that HSS disconnects with the following errors in the log. Nov 26 20:30:25 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][16401]: ERROR: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:157]: sm_process(): sm_process(): In state Closed invalid event Timeout Nov 26 20:31:25 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][16401]: ERROR: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:157]: sm_process(): sm_process(): In state Closed invalid event Timeout Nov 26 20:32:25 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][16401]: ERROR: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:157]: sm_process(): sm_process(): In state Closed invalid event Timeout Nov 26 20:33:04 PROD-HSS-STANDBY systemd[1]: Stopping LSB: Start the Kamailio SIP proxy server... Nov 26 20:33:04 PROD-HSS-STANDBY kamailio_hss[18098]: Stopping Kamailio SIP Server: kamailio_hss:. Nov 26 20:33:04 PROD-HSS-STANDBY systemd[1]: kamailio_hss.service: Succeeded. Nov 26 20:33:04 PROD-HSS-STANDBY systemd[1]: Stopped LSB: Start the Kamailio SIP proxy server. Nov 26 20:33:04 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][16274]: CRITICAL: cdp [diameter_peer.c:423]: diameter_peer_destroy(): destroy_diameter_peer(): Bye Bye from C Diameter Peer test Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY systemd[1]: Starting LSB: Start the Kamailio SIP proxy server... Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY kamailio_hss[18138]: Starting Kamailio SIP Server: kamailio_hss:loading modules under config path: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/:/usr/lib64/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/:/usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules/ Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY kamailio_hss[18138]: Listening on Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY kamailio_hss[18138]: udp: 10.161.224.81 [10.161.224.81]:8080 Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY kamailio_hss[18138]: tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5090 Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY kamailio_hss[18138]: tcp: 10.161.224.81 [10.161.224.81]:8080 Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY kamailio_hss[18138]: Aliases: Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][18155]: WARNING: sl [../../modules/tm/tm_load.h:149]: load_tm_api(): Cannot import load_tm function from tm module Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][18155]: WARNING: sl [../../modules/tm/tm_load.h:149]: load_tm_api(): Cannot import load_tm function from tm module Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][18281]: WARNING: cdp [tcp_accept.c:120]: create_socket(): create_socket(): Trying to open/bind/listen on 10.161.224.81 port 3868 Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][18281]: WARNING: cdp [tcp_accept.c:145]: create_socket(): create_socket(): Successful socket open/bind/listen on 10.161.224.81 port 3868 Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY kamailio_hss[18138]: . Nov 26 20:33:07 PROD-HSS-STANDBY systemd[1]: Started LSB: Start the Kamailio SIP proxy server. Nov 26 20:38:44 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][18282]: WARNING: cdp [peermanager.c:310]: peer_timer(): Inactivity on peer [icscfcdp2.ims.mnc006.mcc410.3gppnetwork.org] and no DWA, Closing peer... Nov 26 20:39:01 PROD-HSS-STANDBY systemd[1]: Starting Clean php session files... Nov 26 20:39:01 PROD-HSS-STANDBY systemd[1]: phpsessionclean.service: Succeeded. Nov 26 20:39:01 PROD-HSS-STANDBY systemd[1]: Started Clean php session files. Nov 26 20:39:20 PROD-HSS-STANDBY [HSS][18282]: ERROR: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:157]: sm_process(): sm_process(): In state Closed invalid event Timeout I am using the following Kamailio version Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) Release: 10 Codename: buster Version: kamailio 5.2.8 (x86_64/linux) 5a7f5b Default config: /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg Default paths to modules: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules Compile flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE=262144 MAX_URI_SIZE=1024 BUF_SIZE=65535 DEFAULT PKG_SIZE=8MB DEFAULT SHM_SIZE=64MB ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 TCP poll methods: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select Source code revision ID: 5a7f5b Compiled with: gcc 8.3.0 Compiled on: 04:34:39 Nov 19 2020 How I can resolve TCP Zero Window Error? I have already tried increasing CDP worker threads, TCP read and write buffers etc. Regards Hamid R. Hashmi

2 1

handling of locally generated 478 errors
by Henning Westerholt 27 Nov '20

27 Nov '20

Hello, I want to ask for your opinion on the best approach regarding the handling of locally generated 478 errors. To give an example, like the ones generated from TM during t_relay() on an unresolvable destination. Nov 25 17:40:13 kamailio[19345]: ERROR: {28607414 INVITE bba500ac-a9df-1239-6693-00505682c04d} tm [ut.h:286]: uri2dst2(): failed to resolve "invalid.skalatan.de" :unresolvable A or AAAA request (-7) Nov 25 17:40:13 kamailio[19345]: ERROR: {28607414 INVITE bba500ac-a9df-1239-6693-00505682c04d} tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches Nov 25 17:40:13 kamailio[19345]: CRITICAL: {28607414 INVITE bba500ac-a9df-1239-6693-00505682c04d} rtpengine [../../core/parser/../ip_addr.h:658]: ip_addr2sbuf(): unknown address family 0 These errors will not show up in onreply or failure_route. A long time ago this was discussed on the list [1], as some functionality were phased out out that support these scenarios. Kamailio will try to generate a 478 with TM, this will obviously fail as well, and then generate a 478 with SL. Question 1) Is this intentional that the internally generated 478 is not showing up in the failure_route, like for for 408? This has been tested several times, but it is a complicated configuration. Question 2) Are there any other (better) ideas how to handle that besides using a "event_route[sl:local-response]" to catch this, e.g. to tear down otherwise stale rtpengine sessions etc..? As a side note, event_route[tm:local-response] seems not to work as well because of the tm failure. Thanks, Henning [1] https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2011-June/069020.html -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>

2 4

Setup IMS solution with Kamailio
by Abidi Adnen 27 Nov '20

27 Nov '20

Greetings , i am around to setup an IMS solution based on your Kamailio solution however i cant find a clear guide to dit properly. I am seeking by this mail you guide to could achieve my setup Thanks and BR, Adnen

2 1

issues using evapi module
by David Escartin 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

Dear all We are trying to use the evapi module to send some data to an external application but I'm having problems getting the clients connected. I have the kamailio (version 5.3) running with a tcp socket 127.0.0.1:8228, and the evapi params are just modparam("evapi", "workers", 4) modparam("evapi", "netstring_format", 0) modparam("evapi", "bind_addr", "127.0.0.1:8448") modparam("evapi", "max_clients", 32) I tried a different number of workers and netstring_format 1 too. When I start the kamailio i added some debug to the code, and seems when doing the mod init of the evapi dispatcher 38(4779) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:779]: init_mod_child(): idx 38 rank -2: evapi [EvAPI Dispatcher] it reaches to while(1) { ev_loop (loop, 0); } at evapi_run_dispatcher function. I guess if I connected to the tcp socket and sent some event, I would see the client accepted and the event route evapi:connection-new would be triggered. But i'm not able to do that. I tried to use the prime option, a tcp input client connection from logstash, so i could relay the data to the logstash using the evapi relay, but i only see the tcp socket being created but no client accepted. I also tried to connect with an erlang gen_tcp client, but it's the same i only see 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/ip_addr.c:229]: print_ip(): tcpconn_new: new tcp connection: 127.0.0.1 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1174]: tcpconn_new(): on port 54537, type 2, socket 105 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:1497]: tcpconn_add(): hashes: 1117:1187:1505, 1 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:375]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xad0880, 105, 2, 0x7fc211712d58), fd_no=53 and if i try to send any data 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:600]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0xad0880, 105, -1, 0x0) fd_no=54 called 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4456]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): sending to child, events 1 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4129]: send2child(): selected tcp worker idx:0 proc:43 pid:4791 for activity on [tcp:127.0.0.1:8448], 0x7fc211712d58 43(4791) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1749]: handle_io(): received n=8 con=0x7fc211712d58, fd=39 43(4791) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:375]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xb3c720, 39, 2, 0x7fc211712d58), fd_no=1 43(4791) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:600]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0xb3c720, 39, -1, 0x10) fd_no=2 called 43(4791) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1671]: release_tcpconn(): releasing con 0x7fc211712d58, state 1, fd=39, id=1 ([127.0.0.1]:54537 -> [127.0.0.1]:8448) 43(4791) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1672]: release_tcpconn(): extra_data (nil) 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:3559]: handle_tcp_child(): reader response= 7fc211712d58, 1 from 0 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/io_wait.h:375]: io_watch_add(): DBG: io_watch_add(0xad0880, 105, 2, 0x7fc211712d58), fd_no=53 47(4798) DEBUG: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:3686]: handle_tcp_child(): CONN_RELEASE 0x7fc211712d58 refcnt= 1 and when i try to send any data 38(10867) DEBUG: evapi [evapi_dispatch.c:610]: evapi_recv_notify(): received [0x7f17d23fc628] [{"test" : "1.1.1.1", "uuid" : "1-31629(a)3.3.3.3" , "pdd" : "4"}] (75) 38(10867) DEBUG: evapi [evapi_dispatch.c:316]: evapi_dispatch_notify(): the message was sent to 0 clients I don't know what i'm missing, or if i'm understanding the use of the module correctly could you please take a look? thanks a lot David -- [image: Logo] David Escartín Almudévar VoIP/Switch Engineer descartin(a)sonoc.io *SONOC* C/ Josefa Amar y Borbón, 10, 4ª · 50001 Zaragoza, España Tlf: +34 917019888 · www.sonoc.io

2 5

Location Fields Address vs Received
by Daniel Greenwald 25 Nov '20

25 Nov '20

On a usrloc record there is an Address field and Received field. The Received field is sometimes not set. What causes it to be not set and what is the difference between the two fields. Sorry if this is a dumb question, I looked at documentation but couldn't find it spelled out. Here is are 2 examples from kamcmd ul.dump: { AoR: utkcf9b6h3(a)ata.phaxio.com Contacts: { Contact: { Address: sip:utkc4ff9b6h3@69.78.34.56:4615;transport=tcp Expires: 42 Q: -1.000000 Call-ID: d1c314305df3d342(a)192.168.0.3 CSeq: 129173 User-Agent: OBIHAI/OBi200-3.2.2.5898 Received: [not set] Path: [not set] State: CS_NEW Flags: 0 CFlags: 0 Socket: tcp:10.0.22.254:5060 Methods: 7839 Ruid: uloc-5fbdd369-491e-4 Instance: <urn:uuid:00000000-0000-0000-0000-9cadef62b3da> Reg-Id: 0 Server-Id: 0 Tcpconn-Id: 58 Keepalive: 0 Last-Keepalive: 1606317577 Last-Modified: 1606317577 } } } Contact: { Address: sip:mfjngfd272av@192.168.0.106:5060 Expires: 30 Q: -1.000000 Call-ID: 67413de375b2e76c(a)192.168.0.106 CSeq: 146320 User-Agent: OBIHAI/OBi300-3.2.2.5921 Received: sip:70.34.56.78:5060 Path: [not set] State: CS_NEW Flags: 0 CFlags: 64 Socket: udp:10.0.22.254:5060 Methods: 7839 Ruid: uloc-5fbdd369-490e-efa3 Instance: <urn:uuid:00000000-0000-0000-0000-9cadef810877> Reg-Id: 0 Server-Id: 0 Tcpconn-Id: -1 Keepalive: 1 Last-Keepalive: 1606314719 Last-Modified: 1606314719 }

2 1

Next online devel meeting - Wed, Nov 25, 2020, 15:00UTC
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 25 Nov '20

25 Nov '20

Hello, in order to plan the roadmap to next major release, it is time to organize another online devel meeting, so the developers and community members can syncronize and plan what should be done till Kamailio v5.5 will be out. Because freenode.net service is requiring user registration to join IRC channels on their servers, the meeting will be done on a matrix chat room. More details are in the wiki page of the event, available at: * https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/devel/irc-meetings/2020b Feel free to add there topics that you want to be discussed. The proposed date is next Wednesday, November 25, 2020, at 15:00UTC (15:00 London/Dublin, 16:00 most of West Europe, 10:00 New York), but other dates can be proposed if they suit for more participants. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

3 5

tsilo: ts_append() cannot find the ts_store() data
by Anthony Alba 25 Nov '20

25 Nov '20

Hi, having tsilo + PUSH problem. My probIem is no matter how I ts_store() the data, ts_append() cannot find any matching uri ERROR: tsilo [ts_append.c:64]: ts_append(): failed to retrieve record for sip:david@voice.example.com In route[LOCATION] { ts_store("sip:$tU@voice.example.com") } in route[PUSHJOIN] { ts_append("location", "sip:$tU@voice.example.com") } ts.dump looks like this { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "Size": 2048, "R-URIs": { "R-URI": "sip:david@192.168.122.7:5060;ob", "Hash": 57095964, "Transactions": { "Transaction": { "Tindex": 15146, "Tlabel": 805874386 } } }, "Stats": { "RURIs": 1, "Max-Slots": 1, "Transactions": 1 } }, "id": 43582 } Thanks Anthony Alba

3 7

kamailio.cfg fomatter
by marek 25 Nov '20

25 Nov '20

hi, i'm using https://github.com/miconda/vscode-kamailio-syntax in VScode. its great! But i need format code. Are there some formatters for kamailio.cfg? It can be for other editors than VScode. Marek

6 9

ACK Relay Issue Transaction Not Found
by me.projects＠yahoo.com 24 Nov '20

24 Nov '20

Hi When ACK is received on Kamailio from PBX t_check_trans() fails. 200 OK sent PBX from Teams and ACK from PBX is provided here. What could be the issue. SIP/2.0 200 OK FROM: "Ext1"<sip:1102@PBX_IP>;tag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f TO: <sip:1101@KAM_IP>;tag=e667397cb47c457a860222931e320b41 CSEQ: 25772 INVITE CALL-ID: a6685754-b402-4a15-82b2-5fb2551e5b58 VIA: SIP/2.0/UDP PBX_IP:7790;received=PBX_IP;branch=z9hG4bKPj170912fc-0908-40bb-8248-9f6cb560332d;rport=7790 RECORD-ROUTE: <sip:sip-du-a-us.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr>,<sip:sbc.callsprout.com;transport=tls;ftag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f;lr>,<sip:KAM_IP:7790;transport=udp;ftag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f;lr> CONTACT: <sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=c825abba-7203-442c-8461-994522d14365;x-c=25f3c2ce3a635971b809dc3be872e51b/s/1/63c9eea743284db99366cabf5f7dcbf5;ias=52.114.132.46~5061~3> CONTENT-LENGTH: 353 SUPPORTED: timer CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdp ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY REQUIRE: timer SESSION-EXPIRES: 1800;refresher=uac SERVER: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2020.11.16.5 i.USEA.5 X-Siptrace-Fromip: tls:KAM_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:PBX_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Time: 1606205334 607029 X-Siptrace-Method: INVITE X-Siptrace-Dir: out ACK sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=c825abba-7203-442c-8461-994522d14365;x-c=25f3c2ce3a635971b809dc3be872e51b/s/1/63c9eea743284db99366cabf5f7dcbf5;alias=.114.132.46~5061~3 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP PBX_IP:7790;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjaa30c14c-c965-473d-bc49-9f223f9f634c From: "Ext1" <sip:1102@PBX_IP>;tag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f To: <sip:1101@KAM_IP>;tag=e667397cb47c457a860222931e320b41 Call-ID: a6685754-b402-4a15-82b2-5fb2551e5b58 CSeq: 25772 ACK Route: <sip:KAM_IP:7790;lr;ftag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f> Route: <sip:sbc.callsprout.com;transport=tls;lr;ftag=e08f0a03-1120-4e13-b0e2-90d1a027c05f> Route: <sip:sip-du-a-us.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr> Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Asterisk Content-Length: 0 X-Siptrace-Fromip: udp:PBX_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:KAM_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Time: 1606205334 615495 X-Siptrace-Method: ACK X-Siptrace-Dir: in

5 10

How to route to calls to asterisk
by Mihai Cezar 23 Nov '20

23 Nov '20

Hi all, I need some help on getting to work my scenario: I have 3 asterisk servers, and every agents (soft phones like zoiper) is connecting to which server they need by contacting the PublicIP of each server. (the problem is that I need to reuse the IP address on others servers) . I want if is possible to use a proxy like "haproxy" but for sip to redirect the agents (softphones), to their coresponding server. For example: - james(a)ast.example.com -> must register to asterisk server 1, - sarah(a)ast2.exampe.com -> must register to asterisk server 2 - andy(a)ast3.example.com-> must register to asterisk server 3 ast.example.com, ast2.example.com, ast3.example.com = will share all the same ip, when the request arrives in the proxy it should check the vhost and redirect to the coresponding server for registering. Any hints and how to do this scenario?

2 3

ACK Not Relayed to MS Teams
by me.projects＠yahoo.com 23 Nov '20

23 Nov '20

Hi, I am integrating PBX with Teams via Kamailio Call is working but ACK delivery has an issue This is the ACK Kamailio receives from PBX I process the ACK with handle_ruri_alias(); and record_route_preset(AS per GUIDE LINES) But this change is not reflected in RELAY ACK from PBX ACK sip:api-du-b-usea.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=0c344c6a-cd75-4095-9891-bf9445c28b82;x-c=5691aa770226562db7d3e16ab090e196/s/1/e857255ef2344e03bd1d12e270ef5e6c;ias=52.114.132.46~5061~3 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP PBX_IP:7790;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjc50440d0-77db-4467-94cb-2f93c4f88538 From: "USER" <sip:13300@PBX_IP>;tag=ab87b9b5-eee3-420c-8472-2eec82a769ac To: <sip:1508@KAMAILIO_IP>;tag=a2ce378b106949cf8bac8f978bb573fb Call-ID: 3dbc6680-fec3-4ba5-8232-6dda8c669bca CSeq: 23811 ACK Route: <sip:KAMAILIO_IP:7790;lr;ftag=ab87b9b5-eee3-420c-8472-2eec82a769ac> Route: <sip:sbc.KAMAILIO_FQDN.com;transport=tls;lr;ftag=ab87b9b5-eee3-420c-8472-2eec82a769ac> Route: <sip:sip-du-a-us.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr> Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Asterisk Content-Length: 0 X-Siptrace-Fromip: udp:PBX_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Toip: udp:KAMAILIO_IP:7790 X-Siptrace-Time: 1606135546 516717 X-Siptrace-Method: ACK X-Siptrace-Dir: in

2 3

textops.subst_uri does not change all branches
by Anthony Alba 23 Nov '20

23 Nov '20

Hello kamailioers, Version 5.4.2. I have a R-URI that I need to change TLS -> TCP in all branches. I do this in request route before t_relay: // AoR has multiple contacts, all with transport=TLS route[REQUEST] { textops.subst_uri("/transport=TLS/transport=TCP/i") //parallel forking //why doesn't this change all branches? t_relay() } If I print out the R-URI in the branch route, I see that only the first R-URI is changed, in the other branches the R-URI transport=TLS is not changed to transport=TCP. Any suggestions on how to get this to work across all Contact addresses? Thanks Anthony Alba

2 1

Issue with ca-list
by George Goglidze 20 Nov '20

20 Nov '20

Hi Folks, I was wondering if somebody could help me with an issue. I’m a newbie here, just installing Kamailio sip server. I’ve enabled TLS, and am trying create a SIP Trunk to external SIP Service which is TLS enabled port 5061. I’ve configured the following in tls.cfg: [server:default] method = TLSv1.2+ verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes private_key = /etc/kamailio/certs/sbc-private.pem certificate = /etc/kamailio/certs/godaddy.pem ca_list = /etc/kamailio/certs/calist.pem In the section above – ca_list = calist.pem contains all the CA’s and Subordinates of the destination server. Private_key and certificate are of my own server (public godaddy signed) [client:default] method = TLSv1.2+ verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes private_key = /etc/kamailio/certs/sbc-private.pem certificate = /etc/kamailio/certs/godaddy.pem ca_list = /etc/kamailio/certs/godaddyca.pem In the section above the ca_list is godaddy’s ca and subordinate. In the wireshark I can see that I’m sending out SIP OPTIONS PING (I’m using dispatcher module). Then the server replies with tls SERVER HELLO which includes it’s certificate But for some reason we are rejecting it: Alert (level: fatal, Description: Unknown CA) How should I set this up to make sure the remote server CA’s are verified? Thank you,

3 9

t_uac_send function with From tag
by João Vitor Arruda 20 Nov '20

20 Nov '20

Hello, I'm trying to use the function t_uac_send inside a failure_route as described in https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.3.x/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_uac_send to send a CANCEL out. Although the documentation says "it can include From/To tags" i was not able to get the from tag provided to be used. Another random generated one is used. I've tried the following format without success: t_uac_send("CANCEL", "$ru", "", "", "From: <$fu>;tag=$ft\r\nTo: $tu\r\nCall-ID: $ci\r\n", "") t_uac_send("CANCEL", "$ru", "", "", "From: $fu;tag=$ft\r\nTo: $tu\r\nCall-ID: $ci\r\n", "") t_uac_send("CANCEL", "$ru", "", "", "From: bob(a)kamailio.org;tag=2w3e\r\nTo: $tu\r\nCall-ID: $ci\r\n", "") In the last one which is copied from the documentation that is how the >From header going out looks like: From: <bob(a)kamailio.org;tag=2w3e>;tag=3393f0703fb0ccaca74109ff37de39f5-36d71ef0 Any tips on how to get the From tag passed to the function to be used? Thanks, Joao Arruda

2 6

Kamailio suddenly stopes responding to sip messages
by Uttam Giri 19 Nov '20

19 Nov '20

Hi, We are using Kamailio with Jitsi client where we observed sometimes Kamailio stops responding to sip messages. As a result, my Jitsi client goes offline and never back online. Also in the Kamailio syslog there are no error logs(debug enabled) related to this issue. As a temporary workaround, we had to restart the Kamailio server all the time. Does anyone observed a similar issue and can suggest any resolution. Kamailio version:- version: kamailio 5.3.5 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 7.5.0 UDP process when Kamailio stops responding:-. root@ip-10-68-16-14:/home/ugiri# kamctl ps { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [ { "IDX": 0, "PID": 15436, "DSC": "main process - attendant" }, { "IDX": 1, "PID": 15442, "DSC": "udp receiver child=0 sock=10.68.16.14:5060 (100.26.5.214:5060 )" }, { "IDX": 2, "PID": 15443, "DSC": "udp receiver child=1 sock=10.68.16.14:5060 (100.26.5.214:5060 )" }, { "IDX": 3, "PID": 15444, "DSC": "udp receiver child=2 sock=10.68.16.14:5060 (100.26.5.214:5060 )" }, { "IDX": 4, "PID": 15445, "DSC": "udp receiver child=3 sock=10.68.16.14:5060 (100.26.5.214:5060 )" }, { "IDX": 5, "PID": 15446, "DSC": "udp receiver child=4 sock=10.68.16.14:5060 (100.26.5.214:5060 )" }, { "IDX": 6, "PID": 15447, "DSC": "udp receiver child=5 sock=10.68.16.14:5060 (100.26.5.214:5060 )" }, { "IDX": 7, "PID": 15448, "DSC": "udp receiver child=6 sock=10.68.16.14:5060 (100.26.5.214:5060 )" }, { "IDX": 8, "PID": 15449, "DSC": "udp receiver child=7 sock=10.68.16.14:5060 (100.26.5.214:5060 )" }, { "IDX": 9, "PID": 15450, "DSC": "slow timer" }, { "IDX": 10, "PID": 15451, "DSC": "timer" }, { "IDX": 11, "PID": 15452, "DSC": "secondary timer" }, { "IDX": 12, "PID": 15453, "DSC": "JSONRPCS FIFO" }, { "IDX": 13, "PID": 15454, "DSC": "JSONRPCS DATAGRAM" }, { "IDX": 14, "PID": 15455, "DSC": "ctl handler" }, { "IDX": 15, "PID": 15456, "DSC": "Http Async Worker" }, { "IDX": 16, "PID": 15457, "DSC": "Http Async Worker" }, { "IDX": 17, "PID": 15458, "DSC": "TIMER NH" }, { "IDX": 18, "PID": 15459, "DSC": "tcp main process" } ], "id": 17709 } Thanks, Uttam

2 3

Re-Invite from callee With RTPEngine between RTP--SRTP
by me.projects＠yahoo.com 19 Nov '20

19 Nov '20

Hi, I have have Kamailio as SBC one-end is SRTP and other end is RTP So I m using rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection DTLS=passive OSRTP-offer ICE=force SRTP")rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection DTLS=off SDES-off ICE=remove RTP") 1-Asterisk(RTP) -----2-Kamailio/RTPEngine ------ 3- Carrier with SRTP I detect source IPs and to manage this all. When call is made from 1 to 3 all works and during call 3 send re-Invite to Hold Call .. We need to call rtpengine_manage and also when on 200OK reply of re-invite from 1. How shall I detect that 1- if this is Re-Invite (has_totag() )and 2- its from Callee. Please advise.

1 0

Presence of plain text username and password in kamailio.cfg
by Ahmed Marsou 19 Nov '20

19 Nov '20

Hi; I want to remove all plain text usernames an passwords from kamailio.cfg file. Like modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "dbdriver://username:password @dbhost/dbname") or this modparam("sqlops","sqlcon","ca=>dbdriver://username:password @dbhost/dbname") Can you help me with some ideas of how can I handle that? Thank you.

5 10

Add Reason Header to kamailio generated CANCEL
by Alfonso Pinto 18 Nov '20

18 Nov '20

Hi everyone, I've got a specific case: when the inv_fr times out, I need to add a Reason header to the CANCEL generated by kamailio. I've tried to see if I could do it in the onsend_route, but that one is not triggered for the generated CANCEL. I also checked event_route[tm:local-request], but that one isn't triggered either for the generated CANCEL. Is there any way to do it? Or maybe to have any pointer about where to look in the code so I may try to trigger event_route[tm:local-request] for these generated CANCELs? Regards, Alfonso

6 17

record-route and INFO
by David Villasmil 18 Nov '20

18 Nov '20

Hello guys, I have a setup like this: FS(private)-->(private)Kamailio1(Public)-->Kamailio2(public)-->provider. I have mhomed=0, enable_double_rr=1, I'm listening on 2 different ports, 1 private, 1 public (with advertise) and on Kamailio1 the DISPATCH ROUTE I force the socket $fs = "LISTEN_PRIVATE_PROTO:LISTEN_PRIVATE_IF:5080"; To the private ip when the destination IP is a private IP. This all works fine. But When calling OUT (i.e. public) kamailio adds itself only for the private IP: *INVITE sip:12345678@mydmain.com <sip%3A12345678(a)mydmain.com> SIP/2.0Record-Route: <sip:172.31.25.124:5080;lr;did=9da.3a61;nat=yes>Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.25.124:5080;branch=z9hG4bKf05e.979fd257ac7f288804ef146d12c1e0fb.0Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.31.6.1:5080;received=172.31.6.1;rport=5080;branch=z9hG4bKQ3H8mgHaUjaBm* So when INFO messages come from the provider to kamailio2, kamailio 2 tries to send the INFO straight to "172.21.25.124". Should i manually add a record-route when calling OUT with record_route_advertised_address("1.2.3.4:5090"); Or is there a better way of getting this working? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users