- sr-users - kamailio.org

Info: APT Debian/Ubuntu Packages Archive
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 24 Sep '21

24 Sep '21

Hello, a new server is available to offer APT repositories for each released version of Kamailio: * https://deb-archive.kamailio.org/ It aims to offer a way to downgrade to an older version, if someone wants it for various reasons. At this moment it offers dedicated APT repositories for Kamailio 5.3.8, 5.4.6, 5.4.7, 5.5.1 and 5.5.2. More details were posted in a news article at: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2021/09/apt-debian-packages-archive/ Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-… [View More]

1 0

PRACK with UDP to TCP translation send over wrong protocol
by Angelo Sipper 24 Sep '21

24 Sep '21

Hello, We have the following setup and I am having trouble passing the PRACK with correct protocol to the provider. UAC (OverTLS) ->(UDP)Kamailio1 (UDP)-> (UDP)Kamailio2 (TCP)-> (TCP)Provider UAC : 10.2.1.160 NATED to 100.100.100.61 <http://50.50.50.50:5065/> (TLS) Kamailio1 Sockets: 50.50.50.210:5061 <http://170.170.170.210:5061/> (TLS), 50.50.50.210:5060 <http://170.170.170.210:5060/> (UDP) Kamailio2 Sockets: 50.50.50.182:5060 <http://170.170.170.170:5060/> … [View More](UDP) 50.50.50.182:5080 <http://170.170.170.170:5060/> (TCP) Provider: 200.200.200.209:5060 <http://200.200.200.193:5060/> (TCP) We use dispatcher on Kamailio1 & Kamailio2 The invite goes fine from UCA up to the provider and the provider responses arrive to UAC fine. The PRACK from UAC to kamailio1 goes fine to Kamaili02 but, Kamailio2 uses the UDP socket to send to the provider so the PRACK does not arrive to the provider and the call is canceled. If the provider is on UDP everything works fine. Below I have the trace. What should I look for in the config to resolve this wrong protocol/socket on the PRACK? Kamailio2 Details: Sockets ====== listen=udp:50.50.50.182:5060 listen=tcp: 50.50.50.182:5080 On the rr module I have ================== modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", 1) modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 1) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) CONFIG REQINIT & WITHINDLG PARTS ================================ route[REQINIT] { set_reply_no_connect(); force_rport(); if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { xlog("L_ERROR","Too Many Hops Rejecting!"); sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } if(is_method("OPTIONS") && uri==myself && $rU==$null) { sl_send_reply("200","Keepalive"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("1511", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP message from $si:$sp sanity 1511\n"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("17895", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP request from $si:$sp sanity 17895\n"); exit; } } route[WITHINDLG] { if (!has_totag()) return; if (loose_route()) { if (is_method("BYE")) { rtpengine_query(); rtpengine_delete(); } route(RELAY_OUT); } if ( is_method("ACK") ) { #if (t_lookup_request()) { if (t_check_trans()) { route(RELAY_OUT); exit; } else { # ACK without matching transaction ... ignore and discard exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not Allowed"); exit; } TRACE ====== 50.50.50.210:5060 50.50.50.182:5060 50.50.50.182:32818 200.200.200.209:5060 qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqq qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqq qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqqq qqqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqqqq a 15:31:11.787490 x INVITE (SDP) x x x a +0.003099 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x x x a 15:31:11.790589 x 100 trying -- your call is x x x a +0.002220 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x x a 15:31:11.792809 x x x INVITE (SDP) x a +0.020725 x x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x a 15:31:11.813534 x x x 100 Trying x a +2.628884 x x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x a 15:31:14.442418 x x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x a +0.001572 x x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x a 15:31:14.443990 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x x a +0.299221 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x x a 15:31:14.743211 x PRACK x x x a +0.043114 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x x x a 15:31:14.786325 x x PRACK x a +0.448104 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x a 15:31:15.234429 x PRACK x x x a +0.045697 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x x x a 15:31:15.280126 x x PRACK x a +0.954153 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x a 15:31:16.234279 x PRACK x x x a +0.045832 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x x x a 15:31:16.280111 x x PRACK x a +1.954170 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x a 15:31:18.234281 x PRACK x x x a +0.045839 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x x x a 15:31:18.280120 x x PRACK x a +1.829676 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x a 15:31:20.109796 x x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x a +0.001460 x x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x a 15:31:20.111256 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x x a +2.123075 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x x a 15:31:22.234331 x PRACK x x x a +0.045825 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x x x a 15:31:22.280156 x x PRACK x a +2.239640 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x a 15:31:24.519796 x x x 486 Busy Here x a +0.000555 x x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x a 15:31:24.520351 x x x ACK x a +0.008965 x x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x a 15:31:24.529316 x 486 Busy Here x x x a +0.000835 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x x a 15:31:24.530151 x ACK x x x a +1.704184 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x x x a 15:31:26.234335 x PRACK x x x a +0.045856 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x x x a 15:31:26.280191 x x PRACK x a +3.954734 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x a 15:31:30.234925 x PRACK x x x x +0.045279 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x x x x 15:31:30.280204 x x PRACK x x +3.954116 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq>>> x x 15:31:34.234320 x PRACK x x x 2021/09/21 15:31:11.787490 50.50.50.210:5060 -> 50.50.50.182:5060 INVITE sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.210;r2=on;lr;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgECBwAABnEBB3ZdWEIAQkVFS0BHX2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAKCQ8ABAkHCAYKAgdxQFpGbkJCRktDREFYU1AAV0Qw;did=e8e.bb7;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.210:5061 ;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgECBwAABnEBB3ZdWEIAQkVFS0BHX2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAKCQ8ABAkHCAYKAgdxQFpGbkJCRktDREFYU1AAV0Qw;did=e8e.bb7;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.f05cee0feff15d488a12d3758cece7ae.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj472f07568b924214ada83ddfb0fb12b6;alias Max-Forwards: 69 From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com> Contact: "MyUserNAme" <sip:mycustomerid@10.2.1.160:58568 ;transport=TLS;ob;alias=100.100.100.61~48572~3> Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14320 INVITE Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 User-Agent: MicroSIP/3.20.5 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 326 P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> v=0 o=- 3841227071 3841227071 IN IP4 50.50.50.215 s=pjmedia b=AS:84 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 36448 RTP/AVP 8 0 101 c=IN IP4 50.50.50.215 b=TIAS:64000 a=ssrc:2024148033 cname:4f2468fd611910fa a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:36449 2021/09/21 15:31:11.790589 50.50.50.182:5060 -> 50.50.50.210:5060 SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.f05cee0feff15d488a12d3758cece7ae.0;i=baa3;rport=5060 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj472f07568b924214ada83ddfb0fb12b6;alias From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com> Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14320 INVITE Server: myserver Content-Length: 0 2021/09/21 15:31:11.792809 50.50.50.182:32818 -> 200.200.200.209:5060 INVITE sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5080 ;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.182;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.210;r2=on;lr;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgECBwAABnEBB3ZdWEIAQkVFS0BHX2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAKCQ8ABAkHCAYKAgdxQFpGbkJCRktDREFYU1AAV0Qw;did=e8e.bb7;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.210:5061 ;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgECBwAABnEBB3ZdWEIAQkVFS0BHX2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAKCQ8ABAkHCAYKAgdxQFpGbkJCRktDREFYU1AAV0Qw;did=e8e.bb7;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 50.50.50.182:5080 ;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.254ecab744d678154779037580c59731.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.f05cee0feff15d488a12d3758cece7ae.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj472f07568b924214ada83ddfb0fb12b6;alias Max-Forwards: 68 From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com> Contact: "MyUserNAme" <sip:mycustomerid@10.2.1.160:58568 ;transport=TLS;ob;alias=100.100.100.61~48572~3> Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14320 INVITE Allow: PRACK, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, UPDATE, INFO, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS Supported: replaces, 100rel, timer, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 326 P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> v=0 o=- 3841227071 3841227071 IN IP4 50.50.50.183 s=pjmedia b=AS:84 t=0 0 a=X-nat:0 m=audio 29308 RTP/AVP 8 0 101 c=IN IP4 50.50.50.183 b=TIAS:64000 a=ssrc:2024148033 cname:4f2468fd611910fa a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:29309 2021/09/21 15:31:11.813534 200.200.200.209:5060 -> 50.50.50.182:32818 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 50.50.50.182:5080 ;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.254ecab744d678154779037580c59731.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.f05cee0feff15d488a12d3758cece7ae.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj472f07568b924214ada83ddfb0fb12b6;alias From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14320 INVITE Content-Length: 0 2021/09/21 15:31:14.442418 200.200.200.209:5060 -> 50.50.50.182:32818 SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 50.50.50.182:5080 ;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.254ecab744d678154779037580c59731.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.f05cee0feff15d488a12d3758cece7ae.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj472f07568b924214ada83ddfb0fb12b6;alias From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14320 INVITE Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5080 ;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5060 ;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.210:5060 ;r2=on;lr;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgECBwAABnEBB3ZdWEIAQkVFS0BHX2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAKCQ8ABAkHCAYKAgdxQFpGbkJCRktDREFYU1AAV0Qw;did=e8e.bb7;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.210:5061 ;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgECBwAABnEBB3ZdWEIAQkVFS0BHX2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAKCQ8ABAkHCAYKAgdxQFpGbkJCRktDREFYU1AAV0Qw;did=e8e.bb7;nat=yes> Contact: <sip:123456789@200.200.200.209:5060> Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,INFO,PRACK,UPDATE,OPTIONS Require: 100rel RSeq: 1509 Content-Length: 241 Content-Disposition: session; handling=required Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=Sonus_UAC 12038 7929 IN IP4 200.200.200.209 s=SIP Media Capabilities c=IN IP4 200.200.200.212 t=0 0 m=audio 17366 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=maxptime:20 2021/09/21 15:31:14.443990 50.50.50.182:5060 -> 50.50.50.210:5060 SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK37fe.f05cee0feff15d488a12d3758cece7ae.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj472f07568b924214ada83ddfb0fb12b6;alias From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14320 INVITE Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5080 ;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5060 ;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.210:5060 ;r2=on;lr;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgECBwAABnEBB3ZdWEIAQkVFS0BHX2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAKCQ8ABAkHCAYKAgdxQFpGbkJCRktDREFYU1AAV0Qw;did=e8e.bb7;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:50.50.50.210:5061 ;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgECBwAABnEBB3ZdWEIAQkVFS0BHX2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAKCQ8ABAkHCAYKAgdxQFpGbkJCRktDREFYU1AAV0Qw;did=e8e.bb7;nat=yes> Contact: <sip:123456789@200.200.200.209:5060> Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,INFO,PRACK,UPDATE,OPTIONS Require: 100rel RSeq: 1509 Content-Length: 253 Content-Disposition: session; handling=required Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=Sonus_UAC 12038 7929 IN IP4 50.50.50.183 s=SIP Media Capabilities c=IN IP4 50.50.50.183 t=0 0 m=audio 29320 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=maxptime:20 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:29321 2021/09/21 15:31:14.743211 50.50.50.210:5060 -> 50.50.50.182:5060 PRACK sip:123456789@200.200.200.209:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.067d9577e9ab3e30e01745a2cf73b7a4.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj9ab94c339144428bb7ada63b133f2c12;alias Max-Forwards: 69 From: "MyUserNAme" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14321 PRACK Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5060 ;lr;r2=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5080 ;transport=tcp;lr;r2=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> RAck: 1509 14320 INVITE Content-Length: 0 2021/09/21 15:31:14.786325 50.50.50.182:5060 -> 200.200.200.209:5060 PRACK sip:123456789transport=tcp@200.200.200.209:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.182;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.3406fe45bb75c3e955b6aa67e53aff58.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.067d9577e9ab3e30e01745a2cf73b7a4.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj9ab94c339144428bb7ada63b133f2c12;alias Max-Forwards: 68 From: "MyUserNAme" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14321 PRACK RAck: 1509 14320 INVITE Content-Length: 0 2021/09/21 15:31:15.234429 50.50.50.210:5060 -> 50.50.50.182:5060 PRACK sip:123456789@200.200.200.209:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.067d9577e9ab3e30e01745a2cf73b7a4.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj9ab94c339144428bb7ada63b133f2c12;alias Max-Forwards: 69 From: "MyUserNAme" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14321 PRACK Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5060 ;lr;r2=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5080 ;transport=tcp;lr;r2=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> RAck: 1509 14320 INVITE Content-Length: 0 2021/09/21 15:31:15.280126 50.50.50.182:5060 -> 200.200.200.209:5060 PRACK sip:123456789transport=tcp@200.200.200.209:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.182;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.3406fe45bb75c3e955b6aa67e53aff58.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.067d9577e9ab3e30e01745a2cf73b7a4.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj9ab94c339144428bb7ada63b133f2c12;alias Max-Forwards: 68 From: "MyUserNAme" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14321 PRACK RAck: 1509 14320 INVITE Content-Length: 0 2021/09/21 15:31:16.234279 50.50.50.210:5060 -> 50.50.50.182:5060 PRACK sip:123456789@200.200.200.209:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.067d9577e9ab3e30e01745a2cf73b7a4.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj9ab94c339144428bb7ada63b133f2c12;alias Max-Forwards: 69 From: "MyUserNAme" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14321 PRACK Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5060 ;lr;r2=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5080 ;transport=tcp;lr;r2=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> RAck: 1509 14320 INVITE Content-Length: 0 2021/09/21 15:31:16.280111 50.50.50.182:5060 -> 200.200.200.209:5060 PRACK sip:123456789transport=tcp@200.200.200.209:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.182;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.3406fe45bb75c3e955b6aa67e53aff58.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.067d9577e9ab3e30e01745a2cf73b7a4.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj9ab94c339144428bb7ada63b133f2c12;alias Max-Forwards: 68 From: "MyUserNAme" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14321 PRACK RAck: 1509 14320 INVITE Content-Length: 0 2021/09/21 15:31:18.234281 50.50.50.210:5060 -> 50.50.50.182:5060 PRACK sip:123456789@200.200.200.209:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;branch=z9hG4bK47fe.067d9577e9ab3e30e01745a2cf73b7a4.0;i=baa3 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.2.1.160:58568 ;received=100.100.100.61;rport=48572;branch=z9hG4bKPj9ab94c339144428bb7ada63b133f2c12;alias Max-Forwards: 69 From: "MyUserNAme" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com >;tag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d To: <sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0d8c9073 Call-ID: 846ffb2f076848c5b8edc876fa1c0d9b CSeq: 14321 PRACK Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5060 ;lr;r2=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> Route: <sip:50.50.50.182:5080 ;transport=tcp;lr;r2=on;ftag=73622588a6084d8ba1bca54781e5094d;did=e8e.c4d1> RAck: 1509 14320 INVITE Content-Length: 0 Any help will be much appreciated. Kind regards, Angelo [View Less]

2 7

Releasing Kamailio 5.3.9
by Henning Westerholt 23 Sep '21

23 Sep '21

Hello, I am planning to release in two weeks (likely on Wednesday 7th October) the next minor version out of branch 5.3, version 5.3.9. Backports of fixed issues from other stable branches will be integrated as usual. If you are aware of new issues which were not yet reported on the issue tracker or are missing back-ports, report them. Please note that this will be the last minor release created from the 5.3.x stable branch. The stable branches are usually maintained from the Kamailio … [View More]

1 0

Kamailio v5.4.7 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.4.7 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.4, that includes fixes since the release of v5.4.6. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.4.x. Deployments running previous v5.4.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.4.7. Note that 5.4 is the second last stable branch, still officially maintained by Kamailio development … [View More]

1 0

Add a new trunk
by sondes boughdiri 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

Good morning , I have a question , how to add a trunk from operators in kamailio. Best regards .

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] How to get $fU and $tU from MSRP module?
by Henning Westerholt 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

(please keep the list in CC) Hello, I see – its kind of pseudo-SIP message that is presented in the cfg in this route. And it seems that you want to access the cpim body. You already checked that the $msrp(crhop), $msrp(nexthop) and $msrp(prevop) etc.. are not working for you? It’s probably not the best way, but what about using $msrp(body) to get the body and then using a regular expression (like a transformation) on this to get the From/To? Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https:/… [View More]/skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/> From: BOEINGNG <lihang567890(a)126.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 2:41 AM To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] How to get $fU and $tU from MSRP module? Yes, I logged, but only got <null> for both $fU and $tU. 2021年9月20日下午4:03，Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de<mailto:hw@skalatan.de>> 写道： Hello, I am not that familiar with the MSRP module, but have you tried to just log/access the $fU and $tU in the event_route[msrp:frame-in]? Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/> From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>> On Behalf Of BOEINGNG Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 10:57 AM To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> Subject: [SR-Users] How to get $fU and $tU from MSRP module? Hello! I want to get $fU and $tU from event_route[msrp:frame-in] in order to filter out MSRP messages sent by a specific sender and received by a specific receiver, I know I can get message content from $msrp(buf), the message content is like this: MSRP 7a57f552155926c0 SEND To-Path: msrp://172.18.0.14:6060/9d8da4a34dc2102959e7;tcp msrp://172.18.0.12:5060/msrp-6142fc2b-84-1;tcp msrp://172.18.0.2:34862/2a67b54ae0750b7d82aa;tcp From-Path: msrp://172.18.0.14:6060/c71ae3675e114d08216b;tcp msrp://172.18.0.12:5060/msrp-6142fc2b-83-1;tcp msrp://172.18.0.2:34858/8baea7c52ba8755322fd;tcp Byte-Range: 1-197/197 Failure-Report: yes Success-Report: yes Message-ID: c792c94039b8a969 Content-Type: message/cpim From: sip:alice@ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org To: sip:bob@ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org DateTime: 2021-09-16T09:23:49.339805+00:00 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain hello -------7a57f552155926c0$ I want to get alice and bob from the content below： From: sip:alice@ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org To: sip:bob@ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org DateTime: 2021-09-16T09:23:49.339805+00:00 someone can suggest some method. In other route like request_route we can use $fU and $tU to access them. Regrads HANG LI [View Less]

1 0

Unable to pull enviornment variables
by Adarsh Chauhan 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

Hi Team, Need some help here. Want to pull environment variable however kamailio just doesnt pick it. I exported the environment variable *export STAGE="dev"* Then i tried following 1) *#!defenv DEVSTAGE* gives error 0(3809) ERROR: <core> [core/cfg.lex:2085]: pp_define_env(): env variable not defined [DEVSTAGE] 2) *#!substdef "/DEVSTAGE/$env(DEVSTAGE)/";* 0(3962) DEBUG: <core> [core/ppcfg.c:87]: pp_subst_add(): ### added subst expression: [/DEVSTAGE/$env(DEVSTAGE)/] 0(3962) … [View More]

3 4

Releasing Kamailio v.5.4.7
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

Hello, I am planning to release a new version from branch 5.4, respectively 5.4.7, sometime next week, likely on Wednesday, Sep 22, 2021. If anyone is aware of issues not yet reported to bug tracker or missing backports, report them in order to try to get the fixes in this release. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 1

JSONRPC ERROR in siremis GUI.
by 岩間理佐 22 Sep '21

22 Sep '21

Hi, I have a question regarding the jsonRPC commands in the siremis GUI. 【Environment】・Centos7 ・Kamailio 5.5.2 ・siremis 5.3 (installed by git clone https://github.com/asipto/siremis siremis-5.3.x) ・php php-mysqlnd-7.1.33-16.el7.remi.x86_64 php-json-7.1.33-16.el7.remi.x86_64 php-mbstring-7.1.33-16.el7.remi.x86_64 php-pdo-7.1.33-16.el7.remi.x86_64 php-gd-7.1.33-16.el7.remi.x86_64 php-xml-7.1.33-16.el7.remi.x86_64 php-pecl-zip-1.19.4-1.el7.remi.7.1.x86_64 php-xmlrpc-7.1.33-16.el7.remi.x86_64 … [View More]

2 1

Question regarding parser error for REGISTER request
by Floimair Florian 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hello List! We have a certain user agent that somehow triggers a parser error log entry, everytime this type of user agent registers. Sep 20 12:03:49 kamailio-dev-1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[1803]: ERROR: <core> [core/parser/parse_param.c:517]: parse_param2(): Invalid character, ; expected The odd thing now is that this register still succeeds. And we do not see that error for other methods like e.g. INVITE. The user agent in question is an Android app based on linphone which we develop … [View More]

2 1

Question on the SL Module
by Alessio Garzi 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hello Kama ML, today I stumbled on function "update_sl_stats()" inside sl_stats.c and noticed that some response codes are treated differently. For example here: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/a9ef78b7f43616f2ceaa26df97eff68eb… since we have a "break;" statement, when a 500 code is received, the 5XX counter is not incremented even if a 500 code belongs to the 5XX family. We have the same behaviour for other response codes and it really seems that it's not a bug and the … [View More]

2 1

Kamilio Presence
by Jerry Kendall 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hey Bill, Just checking to see if you managed to get the BLFs to work on the Yealinks... I've Grandstream/Yealink/Polycom devices and can't get BLFs to work - the NOTIFY is not being sent. regards, Jerry __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions * sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 2

Kamailio - FreeSWITCH - RTPproxy
by Jerry Kendall 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hello all, I am new to the list but have been reading plenty. Loads of good tips and help. I am playing with Freeswitch and would like to put Kamailio/RTPProxy in front for the user endpoints. Freeswitch will talk directly with the service provider. I am wondering *if* i can do this... 1) have the endpoints register with kamailio 2) have the media proxy via RTPProxy as it is needed for NAT 3) have the actual work (voicemail/ring groups/ivr/conference/etc...) done on Freeswitch 4) have all … [View More]

3 3

How to get $fU and $tU from MSRP module?
by BOEINGNG 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hello! I want to get $fU and $tU from event_route[msrp:frame-in] in order to filter out MSRP messages sent by a specific sender and received by a specific receiver, I know I can get message content from $msrp(buf), the message content is like this: MSRP 7a57f552155926c0 SEND To-Path: msrp://172.18.0.14:6060/9d8da4a34dc2102959e7;tcp msrp://172.18.0.12:5060/msrp-6142fc2b-84-1;tcp msrp://172.18.0.2:34862/2a67b54ae0750b7d82aa;tcp From-Path: msrp://172.18.0.14:6060/c71ae3675e114d08216b;tcp msrp://… [View More]

2 1

Reinite breaks the call
by Angelo Sipper 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hello, I am trying to understand a problem we have with reinvites. When there is a reinvite on the call our provider refuses to receive the reinvite and the call is dropped. The setup is the bellow: UA-> Kamailio1 -> Kamailio2 -> Provider On Kamailio2 we have Topos enabled. Looking on the trace I can see that on the second invite, Kamailio does send out the original contact and not the one that was originally send out to the provider. Is this correct? Is this breaking the call? … [View More]Bellow the trace and the flow from Kamailio2 until the second reinvite. All reinvites are the same as per the last Thank you for your help! 2021/09/15 16:29:59.420162 50.50.50.181:5060 -> 200.200.200.193:5060 INVITE sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.181;branch=z9hG4bK3db6.b5141bfea33b57c5223aff14ab3b5466.0 Max-Forwards: 67 From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=2QK2mpeH5Sy4g To: <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> Call-ID: dfb297d1-90cb-123a-d4a1-00155d01bf11 CSeq: 41302510 INVITE Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, presence, as-feature-event, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 481 Contact: <sip:btpsh-b5-6141f513-11f69-4@50.50.50.181> v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1631683257 1631683258 IN IP4 50.50.50.183 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 50.50.50.183 t=0 0 m=audio 26472 RTP/AVP 8 0 18 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:26473 a=ptime:20 m=video 26510 RTP/AVP 103 b=AS:1024 a=rtpmap:103 H264/90000 a=rtcp-fb:103 ccm fir a=rtcp-fb:103 ccm tmmbr a=rtcp-fb:103 nack a=rtcp-fb:103 nack pli a=sendrecv a=rtcp:26511 ====================================================================================== 2021/09/15 16:29:59.439009 200.200.200.193:5060 -> 50.50.50.181:5060 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.181;branch=z9hG4bK3db6.b5141bfea33b57c5223aff14ab3b5466.0 From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=2QK2mpeH5Sy4g To: <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0dc15c15 Call-ID: dfb297d1-90cb-123a-d4a1-00155d01bf11 CSeq: 41302510 INVITE Content-Length: 0 ====================================================================================== 2021/09/15 16:30:02.596613 200.200.200.193:5060 -> 50.50.50.181:5060 SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.181;branch=z9hG4bK3db6.b5141bfea33b57c5223aff14ab3b5466.0 From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=2QK2mpeH5Sy4g To: <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0dc15c15 Call-ID: dfb297d1-90cb-123a-d4a1-00155d01bf11 CSeq: 41302510 INVITE Contact: <sip:1234567890@200.200.200.193:5060> Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,INFO,PRACK,UPDATE,OPTIONS Content-Length: 313 Content-Disposition: session; handling=required Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=Sonus_UAC 27823 25478 IN IP4 200.200.200.193 s=SIP Media Capabilities c=IN IP4 200.200.200.196 t=0 0 m=audio 19958 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=maxptime:20 m=video 0 RTP/AVP 103 b=AS:1024 a=rtpmap:103 H264/90000 a=inactive ====================================================================================== 2021/09/15 16:30:06.163783 200.200.200.193:5060 -> 50.50.50.181:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.181;branch=z9hG4bK3db6.b5141bfea33b57c5223aff14ab3b5466.0 From: 987654321 <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=2QK2mpeH5Sy4g To: <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0dc15c15 Call-ID: dfb297d1-90cb-123a-d4a1-00155d01bf11 CSeq: 41302510 INVITE Accept: application/sdp, application/isup, application/dtmf, application/dtmf-relay, multipart/mixed Contact: <sip:1234567890@200.200.200.193:5060> Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,INFO,PRACK,UPDATE,OPTIONS P-Asserted-Identity: <sip:6979111336@MOBILE.MOBILEPROVIDER.COM;user=phone> Require: timer Supported: timer Session-Expires: 300;refresher=uac Content-Length: 313 Content-Disposition: session; handling=required Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=Sonus_UAC 27823 25478 IN IP4 200.200.200.193 s=SIP Media Capabilities c=IN IP4 200.200.200.196 t=0 0 m=audio 19958 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv a=maxptime:20 m=video 0 RTP/AVP 103 b=AS:1024 a=rtpmap:103 H264/90000 a=inactive ====================================================================================== 2021/09/15 16:30:06.405147 50.50.50.181:5060 -> 200.200.200.193:5060 ACK sip:1234567890@200.200.200.193:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.181;branch=z9hG4bK3db6.58e9d8820221b191b49fe0c91299e56f.0 Max-Forwards: 68 From: "987654321" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=2QK2mpeH5Sy4g To: <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0dc15c15 Call-ID: dfb297d1-90cb-123a-d4a1-00155d01bf11 CSeq: 41302510 ACK Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="mycustomerid", realm=" sbc1.mydomain.com", nonce="YUH2g2FB9VcCxZ3l2WSvJCj7aUokLhAKksYQ1zfOfyQRWm90h2vJgH8I/B+A", algorithm=MD5, uri="sip:1234567890@sbc1.mydomain.com", response="dc4d3d7e9281c04ecc3e3 63ea162fb" Content-Length: 0 Contact: <sip:btpsh-b5-6141f513-11f69-4@50.50.50.181> ============================================= 2021/09/15 16:32:37.685497 50.50.50.181:5060 -> 200.200.200.193:5060 INVITE sip:1234567890@200.200.200.193:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.181;branch=z9hG4bK4db6.691137b194a14953af928c339e03d60e.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.50.50.210;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK4db6.4619cd1b550ba7e45a3fbd0321a5c0b0.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 62.1.2.62;received=62.1.2.62;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bKXDZQF19XUj3QB Max-Forwards: 67 From: "987654321" <sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=2QK2mpeH5Sy4g To: <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com>;tag=gK0dc15c15 Call-ID: dfb297d1-90cb-123a-d4a1-00155d01bf11 CSeq: 41302511 INVITE Contact: <sip:mycustomerid@62.1.2.62:5060 ;transport=udp;gw=1606bb6a-6563-43be-b4dd-4890d524d0e9> User-Agent: Supervoice VPBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, path, replaces Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="mycustomerid", realm=" sbc1.mydomain.com", nonce="YUH2g2FB9VcCxZ3l2WSvJCj7aUokLhAKksYQ1zfOfyQRWm90h2vJgH8I/B+A", algorithm=MD5, uri="sip:atpsh-b5-6141f513-11f69-4@50.50.50.181", response="50ed75ca9002 ca76fbfa306fb8a599" Session-Expires: 300;refresher=uac Min-SE: 120 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 348 Remote-Party-ID: "987654321" <sip:987654321@sbc1.mydomain.com >;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1631683257 1631683258 IN IP4 50.50.50.183 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 50.50.50.183 t=0 0 m=audio 26472 RTP/AVP 8 0 18 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:26473 a=ptime:20 m=video 0 RTP/AVP 103 a=rtpmap:103 H264/90000 |Time | 50.50.50.210 | 200.200.200.193 | | | | 50.50.50.181 | |0.000024 | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> Call-ID:dfb297d1-90cb-123a-d4a1-00155d01bf11 CSeq:41302510 | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | | |0.001523 | 100 trying -- your c | |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | | |0.011760 | | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302510 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |0.030607 | | 100 Trying| |SIP Status 100 Trying | | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | |2.690501 | | 183 Session Progress |SIP Status 183 Session Progress | | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | |2.708868 | 183 Session Progress | |SIP Status 183 Session Progress | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | | |3.188211 | | 183 Session Progress |SIP Status 183 Session Progress | | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | |3.199099 | 183 Session Progress | |SIP Status 183 Session Progress | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | | |6.755381 | | 200 OK SDP (g711A te |SIP Status 200 OK | | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | |6.819017 | 200 OK SDP (g711A te | |SIP Status 200 OK | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | | |6.973845 | ACK | | |SIP Request INVITE ACK 200 CSeq:41302510 | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | | |6.996745 | | ACK | |SIP ACK From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302510 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |158.269723| INVITE SDP (g711A g7 | |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> Call-ID:dfb297d1-90cb-123a-d4a1-00155d01bf11 CSeq:41302511 | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | | |158.275396| 100 trying -- your c | |SIP Status 100 trying -- your call is important to us | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | | |158.277105| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |158.753781| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |159.753493| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |161.753502| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |165.753630| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |169.754980| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |173.753719| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |177.753676| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |181.753657| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |185.753503| | INVITE SDP (g711A g7 |SIP INVITE From: 1234567890 <sip:1234567890@sip.mydomain.com> To:< sip:987654321@sip.mydomain.com> CSeq:41302511 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |188.254337| 503 Service not avai | |SIP Status 503 Service not available | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | | |188.255085| ACK | | |SIP Request INVITE ACK 200 CSeq:41302511 | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | | |188.326552| BYE | | |SIP Request BYE CSeq:41302512 | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | | |188.342106| | BYE | |SIP Request BYE CSeq:41302512 | | |(5060) ------------------> (5060) | |188.373697| | 200 OK | |SIP Status 200 OK | | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | |188.379670| 200 OK | | |SIP Status 200 OK | |(5060) <------------------ (5060) | | Kind Regards, Angelo [View Less]

4 4

Re: [SR-Users] Error in ul_insert_ucontact() function of usrloc module
by hamed r 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

hello Ben I was using development functions and the C code of this function did not exist. I needed to manually add a contact to kamailio but this does not work and I used the HTable module to solve the problem. Thanks for the tips

1 0

Slack channel
by Sergio Carvalho 20 Sep '21

20 Sep '21

Hi everyone, How can I join the Kamailio slack channel? Is it open to the community? Best regards, Sergio Carvalho

3 2

Error in ul_insert_ucontact() function of usrloc module
by hamed r 18 Sep '21

18 Sep '21

The user is not added using the ul_insert_ucontact() function : ul_insert_ucontact("sip:900@192.168.51.138:1234", "< sip:900@192.168.51.138:1234>", "303", -1, "a2ecd821d4464d75851b73c35442b6ad", 2222, "0", "1", "MicroSIP/3.20.6", "udp: 192.168.51.106:5060"); And the following error is displayed in the syslog: Sep 18 14:36:48 srv139937 kamailio: CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3686]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio//kamailio.cfg, line 838, column 148: … [View More]

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] problem with LRKProxy module
by hamed r 18 Sep '21

18 Sep '21

Thanks Mojtaba, problem was solved. I performed LRKProxy first, then Kamailio.

1 0

BLF when phone boots up
by Jerry Kendall 17 Sep '21

17 Sep '21

Hi, I have looked at lots of postings but can't seem to find the answer I seek. I have 6 phones (Grandstream GXP2170, etc) connected to Kamailio 5.2.1 running default config file with changes per https://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf On x301, I have the 3 BLFs setup to monitor x302, x303 and x304. If I dial 303 from 301, the BLFs work (flash, red, then green) as expected. But, when the phone initially boots up, the BLFs are all dead - until the first PUBLISH event. So, the … [View More]

1 0

listen directive during runtime
by Tihomir Culjaga 17 Sep '21

17 Sep '21

Hi, is it possible to add a listen directive during kamailio runtime ? The reason I'm asking this is in a situation when I add a new peering trunk (from a different network segment), I need to add a network interface to the kamailio server and then add a specific listen directive for that interface to reference the socket by name. listen=udp:10.1.1.11 name "mySN1" so i can further reference to a specific socket name when routing SIP messages. Please advise, Regards, Tihomir.

2 1

Re: [SR-Users] DMQ module issues
by Zé Santos 17 Sep '21

17 Sep '21

I don't think you understood. The issue is in v5.2.5, and I tried to update kamailio but it still remains. I honestly think this is a machine problem, since I can't even send the notifications to 0.0.0.0:5090. It is very weird. Best Regards, José Santos

2 3

xmlrpc always returns NO RESULT
by 岩間理佐 17 Sep '21

17 Sep '21

Hi, I have a question regarding the XMLRPC commands in the siremis GUI. 【Environment】・Centos7 ・kamailio 5.5.2 ・siremis 5.3 （installed by git clone https://github.com/asipto/siremis siremis-5.3.x）・php: $ rpm -qa | grep php php-process-5.4.16-48.el7.x86_64 php-common-5.4.16-48.el7.x86_64 php-mysqlnd-5.4.16-48.el7.x86_64 php-pdo-5.4.16-48.el7.x86_64 php-xml-5.4.16-48.el7.x86_64 php-cli-5.4.16-48.el7.x86_64 php-5.4.16-48.el7.x86_64 php-pear-1.9.4-22.el7.noarch ・apache 2.4.6 … [View More]When I execute commands in command service → XMLPRC from siremis GUI, it always shows no result. It looks like the command is not being executed. I also executed these commands on server, and there are no problem. There is no error in apache log and kamailio is also working. This is what I have in /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg #!KAMAILIO #!define WITH_XMLRPC #!define WITH_DEBUG #!define DBURL "mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@localhost/kamailio" # - flags #FLT_ - per transaction (message) flags #FLB_ - per branch flags #!define FLT_ACC 1 #!define FLT_ACCMISSED 2 #!define FLT_ACCFAILED 3 #!define WITH_MYSQL #!define WITH_NAT ####### Global Parameters ######### #!ifdef WITH_DEBUG debug=4 log_stderror=yes #!else debug=2 log_stderror=no #!endif #!ifdef WITH_MYSQL loadmodule "db_mysql.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_NAT loadmodule "nathelper.so" #!ifdef WITH_RTPENGINE loadmodule "rtpengine.so" #!else loadmodule "rtpproxy.so" #!endif #!endif #!ifdef WITH_JSONRPC loadmodule "xhttp.so" #!endif memdbg=5 memlog=5 log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0 fork=yes children=4 disable_tcp=yes auto_aliases=no port=5060 listen=udp:172.23.0.246:5060 advertise 52.69.75.254:5060 sip_warning=no ####### Modules Section ######## # set module path #mpath="/usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules/" #loadmodule "db_mysql.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "maxfwd.so" loadmodule "textops.so" loadmodule "siputils.so" loadmodule "xlog.so" loadmodule "sanity.so" loadmodule "ctl.so" loadmodule "acc.so" loadmodule "dispatcher.so" loadmodule "uac.so" loadmodule "sqlops" loadmodule "rtimer" loadmodule "jsonrpcs.so" loadmodule "kex.so" loadmodule "corex.so" # ----- jsonrpcs params ----- modparam("jsonrpcs", "pretty_format", 1) modparam("jsonrpcs", "dgram_socket", "/var/run/kamailio/kamailio_rpc.sock") modparam("jsonrpcs", "dgram_mode", 0666) modparam("jsonrpcs", "dgram_user", "kamailio") modparam("jsonrpcs", "dgram_group", "kamailio") modparam("jsonrpcs", "transport", 0) # ----- xmlrpc params ----- #modparam("xmlrpc", "route", "XMLRPC") #modparam("xmlrpc", "url_match", "^/RPC") # ----- rr params ----- modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 1) # ----- R Timer ----- modparam("rtimer", "timer", "name=cdr;interval=300;mode=1;") modparam("rtimer", "exec", "timer=cdr;route=CDRS") # ----- acc params ----- modparam("acc", "log_flag", FLT_ACC) modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", FLT_ACCFAILED) modparam("acc", "log_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd;src_ip=$si") # ----- tm params ----- modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 2000) modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 40000) modparam("tm", "auto_inv_100_reason", "Trying") # ----- dispatcher params ----- modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher") modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "xavp_dst", "_dsdst_") modparam("dispatcher", "xavp_ctx", "_dsctx_") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:proxy@52.69.75.254") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 60) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_timer_mode", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "xavp_dst_mode", 0) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_latency_stats", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshold", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_inactive_threshold", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes","class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3") # ----- uac params ----- modparam("uac", "reg_db_url", DBURL) modparam("uac", "reg_contact_addr", "52.69.75.254") modparam("uac", "reg_db_table", "uacreg") # ----- mysql ----- modparam("sqlops", "sqlcon","cb=>mysql://kamailio:kamailiorw@localhost/kamailio") ####### Routing Logic ######## # main request routing logic request_route { # per request initial checks route(REQINIT); # CANCEL processing if (is_method("CANCEL")) { if (t_check_trans()) { route(RELAY); } exit; } # handle retransmissions if (!is_method("ACK")) { if(t_precheck_trans()) { t_check_trans(); exit; } t_check_trans(); } # handle requests within SIP dialogs route(WITHINDLG); ### only initial requests (no To tag) # record routing for dialog forming requests (in case they are routed) # - remove preloaded route headers remove_hf("Route"); if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) { record_route(); } # account only INVITEs if (is_method("INVITE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting } # handle presence related requests route(PRESENCE); # handle registrations route(REGISTRAR); if ($rU==$null) { # request with no Username in RURI sl_send_reply("484","Address Incomplete"); exit; } # dispatch destinations route(DISPATCH); } route[RELAY] { if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } # Per SIP request initial checks route[REQINIT] { if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); exit; } if(!sanity_check("1511", "7")) { xlog("Malformed SIP message from $si:$sp\n"); exit; } } # Handle requests within SIP dialogs route[WITHINDLG] { if (!has_totag()) { return; } # sequential request withing a dialog should # take the path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { if (is_method("BYE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails } route(RELAY); } if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) { # in-dialog subscribe requests route(PRESENCE); } if ( is_method("ACK") ) { if ( t_check_trans() ) { t_relay(); exit; } else { exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); exit; } # Handle SIP registrations route[REGISTRAR] { if(!is_method("REGISTER")) return; sl_send_reply("404", "No registrar"); exit; } # Presence server route route[PRESENCE] { if(!is_method("PUBLISH|SUBSCRIBE")) return; sl_send_reply("404", "Not here"); exit; } # Dispatch requests route[DISPATCH] { # round robin dispatching on gateways group '1' if(!ds_select_dst("1", "11")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } xdbg("--- SCRIPT: going to <$ru> via <$du> (attrs: $xavp(_dsdst_=>attrs))\n"); t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } # Try next destionations in failure route failure_route[RTF_DISPATCH] { if (t_is_canceled()) { exit; } # next DST - only for 500 or local timeout if (t_check_status("500|486") or (t_branch_timeout() and !t_branch_replied())) { if(ds_next_dst()) { xdbg("--- SCRIPT: retrying to <$ru> via <$du> (attrs: $xavp(_dsdst_=>attrs))\n"); t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } } } I have tried my best to do some researches about it, but still stuck. Any help is appreciated. Thank you! [View Less]

2 1

problem with LRKProxy module
by hamed r 16 Sep '21

16 Sep '21

Hello I have problem with lrkproxy module. First, I installed the packages from the link below : https://github.com/mojtabaesfandiari/pylrkproxy And the service was properly listened to the local ip (192.168.51.106:22333 ). In the next step, the parameters were added to the kamalio.cfg file : loadmodule "lrkproxy.so" modparam("lrkproxy", "lrkproxy_sock", "udp:192.168.51.106:22333") I also changed the /etc/pylrkproxy/pylrkproxy.ini to set local ip. But when I make a call, the ip inside the … [View More]

2 1

DMQ module issues
by Zé Santos 16 Sep '21

16 Sep '21

Hi guys, I am currently using kamailio v5.2.5 and running it inside a container. I already attempted to upgrade the kamailio to the latest version however the problem persists. This is the core dump that I got from using gdb: Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -f > /etc/kazoo/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 512 -M 64 -x tlsf -w'. > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. > #0 0x000000000071c63c in select_cfg_var (res=0x7ffd57d49b10, > s=0x7f2649395040, msg=… [View More]

3 3

Best practice for Kamailio "cluster" front for many TLS connections
by Angelo Sipper 15 Sep '21

15 Sep '21

Hello, We are thinking to use kamailio to fully support our current voip service. I would like to know what is the best practice to use kamailio for several thousands for clients that connect to us via TLS. We would like to have a front "cluster" to be able to handle all these connections in balanced way. All clients register to us and the do calls that we statefully forward to the provider. On our test we have already created a single kamailio that successfully accepts and handles … [View More]

7 12

Fwd: Catching an overall timeout after dropping replies
by Marrold 15 Sep '21

15 Sep '21

Hi, This is partially related to a previous thread - https://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/2021-August/113128.html We are using the TSILO module to suspend transactions whilst we wait for mobile app users to register after receiving a push notification. In the time we are waiting for the app to register, other UAs might reject the call (DND, Busy, etc). To avoid this failure response being relayed to the caller, we use t_drop_replies in the failure_route. Eventually if all devices … [View More]

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Empty Subnets in Permissions Module
by Henning Westerholt 14 Sep '21

14 Sep '21

Hello, please keep the list in CC. Let’s look into the two issues one by one: 1) I had to explicitly configure the parameter: modparam("permissions", "mask_col", "mask") Although the documentation suggests "mask" is the default - the JSON output from "kamctl address dump" did not output this value on K5.5. (On K5.3 it outputted properly) Do you get an error if you do not specify the mask_col like this, or something else? From the source code the default should be “mask”. When I run the "… [View More]kamcmd permissions.subnetDump" on Kamailio 5.3, it returns everything as expected - including the 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0> subnets. However, when running the same commands on Kamailio 5.5, it only returns a small subset (of only 20) subnets/groups - and the selection does not appear to follow a logical selection criteria. Additionally, it does not return any groups with a 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0> subnet either. It seems that the behaviour has changed regarding the “0” subnet, checkout the docs: https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/permissions.html#permission… It will convert them to 32/128 respectively. Can you see a 0.0.0./32 in your dump? This was changed in commit f376c82a9f8 during an extension for text files. Maybe Daniel can comment here if this was done by purpose. Otherwise, you can open an issue on our tracker about it. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/> From: Tom Dworakowski <dworakowski.tom(a)gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 5:00 PM To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Empty Subnets in Permissions Module Hello Henning, Thank you for looking into this for me. I made two interesting discoveries this morning: 1) I had to explicitly configure the parameter: modparam("permissions", "mask_col", "mask") Although the documentation suggests "mask" is the default - the JSON output from "kamctl address dump" did not output this value on K5.5. (On K5.3 it outputted properly) 2) When I run the "kamcmd permissions.subnetDump" on Kamailio 5.3, it returns everything as expected - including the 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0> subnets. However, when running the same commands on Kamailio 5.5, it only returns a small subset (of only 20) subnets/groups - and the selection does not appear to follow a logical selection criteria. Additionally, it does not return any groups with a 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0> subnet either. From my logs - I have noted this: Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4353, 0.0.0.0, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <3769, 0.0.0.0, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4355, 0.0.0.0, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4359, 0.0.0.0, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <1955, 84.XX.XX.66, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4361, 91.X.X.231, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4361, 91.X.X.33, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4361, 91.X.X.34, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4363, 80.X.X.25, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4363, 85.X.X.124, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4363, 212.X.X.19, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4365, 0.0.0.0, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4367, 0.0.0.0, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <4371, 0.0.0.0, 0> inserted into address hash table Sep 14 03:07:25 webrtc kamailio[5407]: 0(5407) DEBUG: permissions [address.c:118]: reload_address_insert(): Tuple <3991, 0.0.0.0, 0> inserted into address hash table At the moment of querying group id 3983 (where there is only 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0>), the function returns false: DEBUG: permissions [address.c:671]: allow_source_address(): looking for <3983, [IPv4 in hex, reversed octet order], 62281> However, None of those addresses appear in the "kamcmd permissions.subnetDump" output. Moreover, if "my" group has the address 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0> listed as an approved address - it will fail the test; but if I register 0.0.0.0/1<http://0.0.0.0/1> it will let me through (as my IP is < 128.0.0.0), kamcmd permissions.subnetDump will display this address. My thoughts are that there might be another table that is not being populated - or there is a filter during the import that either drops 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0> or filters it out completely? Regards, Tom On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 4:10 AM Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de<mailto:hw@skalatan.de>> wrote: Hello Tom, I’ve done a quick comparison of the main function and the called function. On a first view it looked identically, but I looked only a few levels deep. Do you have maybe some means to reproduce this on a test system? Then it would be probably interesting to look to the DEBUG logging of this cases. Maybe you can compare if you spot some obvious differences from the logic. Cheers, Henning From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org>> On Behalf Of Tom Dworakowski Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 4:10 AM To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> Subject: [SR-Users] Empty Subnets in Permissions Module Greetings all! I have two deployments of Kamailio: one running version 5.3 and one 5.5 with practically identical configurations, same (MySQL and REDIS) data sources. We have customers that we assign an ACL "group" to, where the ID of this group resolves to records in the "address" table in our MySQL database - using the "grp" field. On the box running Kamailio 5.5, we have noticed that if a group has ip_addr=0.0.0.0, mask=0, port=0 - and we try to run the allow_source_address() - it will return false, thus failing this phase of the authentication process. However, on Kamailio 5.3 we are not seeing this issue, i.e. if a customer is assigned a group where the ACL is 0.0.0.0/0<http://0.0.0.0/0> - it will let him through. Has something changed that I'm not aware of? Any suggestions on how to resolve this? My best, Tom [View Less]

2 1

Capturing response from uac_reg module
by Ross McKillop 14 Sep '21

14 Sep '21

Hi, What's the best way to capture the response from REGISTER requests automatically initiated by the uac_reg module? I was looking to use event_route[uac:reply] {} but that is only triggered if the evroute flag is set on the initial call made to uac_req_send() Is there a way to set this globally so that uac:reply is called for all requests initiated for peers in the uacreg table or a better way to capture the response? Best, Ross

3 4

Kamailio 5.4.3 crash at SSL error
by Igor Olhovskiy 14 Sep '21

14 Sep '21

Hello. Kamailio 5.4.3 crashes at CentOS 7 with following error logs Sep 13 13:15:11 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[44592]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1500]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f3b93734cf8 r: 0x7f3b93734e20 (-1) Sep 13 13:15:12 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[44594]: NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:747]: sr_ssl_ctx_info_callback(): SSL handshake started Sep 13 13:15:12 kernel: traps: kamailio[44594] general protection ip:7f3ba8fb3c09 sp:7ffe2c3aff70 error:0 … [View More]

2 3

Manage blacklisting on network errors
by Marat Gareev 14 Sep '21

14 Sep '21

Hello! I have a simple config for routing requests with failover and blacklisting on 408, 480 and 503 codes from servers. This is a part of config: # Wrapper for relaying requests route[RELAY] { # the base event routes t_on_branch("MANAGE_BRANCH"); t_on_reply("MANAGE_REPLY"); t_on_failure("MANAGE_FAILURE"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); } exit; } # Manage incoming replies onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "$rr ($rs) [$cs] ($ci) $si:$sp - $ua\n"); if ( t_check_status("(… [View More]

2 2

Question about suspected memory leak presence module
by Albert Petit 14 Sep '21

14 Sep '21

Hi, I am suspecitng presence module might be having a memory leak on a production server used by an end user (not have access to it). The output of command kamcmd mod.stats presence shm is Module: presence { mem_copy_subs(148): 25720 mem_copy_subs_noc(214): 1672201904 mem_copy_subs_noc(251): 678406560 add_event(181): 88 shm_copy_event(57): 40 shm_copy_event(50): 312 add_event(156): 40 add_event(149): 456 … [View More]

2 3

Empty Subnets in Permissions Module
by Tom Dworakowski 14 Sep '21

14 Sep '21

Greetings all! I have two deployments of Kamailio: one running version 5.3 and one 5.5 with practically identical configurations, same (MySQL and REDIS) data sources. We have customers that we assign an ACL "group" to, where the ID of this group resolves to records in the "address" table in our MySQL database - using the "grp" field. On the box running Kamailio 5.5, we have noticed that if a group has ip_addr=0.0.0.0, mask=0, port=0 - and we try to run the allow_source_address() - it will … [View More]

2 1

Kamailio dispatcher -> FreeSWITCH transfers handling.
by Тимур Ситдиков 11 Sep '21

11 Sep '21

Hi list! :-) I'm a total newbie in Kamailio. Trying to study) Sorry for lots of text, I'm simply don't know how to explain my questions shorter :-D I want to configure Kamailio as dispatcher, registrar and NAT traversal in front of FS farm. I've managed to set up Kamailio and Fswitches. Now I need to handle "special cases" with confs, REFER transfers etc Giovanni Maruzzelli once presented solution for this, with following logic: -----------------------------------------------------------------… [View More]-------------------------------------- 1) Kamailio by default distribute calls to various FSs - dispatch or load_balance 2) Each time Kamailio sends a call to a FS, it writes down which destination "number" is going to which FS server and from which UserID 3) if another call comes for the same (or related) destination, or is originated from the same UserID then Kamailio sends the call to that same FS server, bypassing default distribution algorithm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sounds good and helpful, but I'm stuck :-( *Can someone please share an example or point me how and in what form should I write down call info,and how can I control it (delete on BYE or CANCEL)?* Actually there are 2 questions It seems to me that recordings can be made using HTABLEs but here's a problem: ===================================================================================== ============================================================================================= 1) PROBLEM WITH WRITING TO HTABLE ON ATT TRANSFER After the dispatcher sets $du - I write an htable entry $sht(fsdest=>$fU:$rU) = $du; Existing entries are removed on catching 'BYE' for normal clearing, and with failure_route for all failures. BYE logic is: IN WITHINNDLG route if (has_totag()) { if (loose_route()) { if (is_method("BYE")) { if (sht_match_name("fsdest", "eq", "$fU:$rU")) { $sht(fsdest=>$fU:$rU) = $null; //BYE A->B } else { $sht(fsdest=>$rU:$fU) = $null; //BYE A<-B } } handle_ruri_alias(); route(RELAY); } } Another entry is setting up if blind transfer is made. If INVITE is coming from one of FSs, and have 'Referred-By' field. IN DIALOG route: if (is_present_hf("Referred-By")) { $sht(fsdest=>$fU:$rU) = $si; } For now it's working. Entries are written and deleted properly. *Problem with Attended transfer.* 1) A --> B = htable entry A:B=xxxx 2) A --> C = htable entry A:C=xxxx(checked and set same FS addr because $fU is present (If only it's worked as it should)) 3) Att transfer (Refer $rU B, referred-by - A. Refer-To - C) B --> C = all related entries deleted from table over BYE logic. 4) No entry B --> C (no INVITE was sent, bridged by REFER) So, logic for check active calls in htable is broken now, because we don't have entry B-->C *How can I handle writing to htable in Attended transfer case?* If another Invite will come FROM or TO B or C = there will be no htable entry. I'm not sure this is even a correct way. Surely missing something. ============================================================================================= ============================================================================================= 2) PROBLEM WITH IDENTIFYING TABLE ENTRIES Anyway, the main problem is with identifying those htables to set proper $du. If INVITE is coming TO FSs I need to check if caller ID ($fU) or dest ($rU) is present in htables. Form I need to write to hash must be like $fU:$rU Entry must be unique or it will be: 1) rewrited anytime a new invite is going to the same dest. 2) deleted anytime BYE or failure will come eg: If $sht(fsdest=>$rU) = $dd 1) 1000 --> 3200 = htable entry 3200 = xxxx 2) 1005 --> 3200 = htable entry rewriten to the same 3200 = xxxx When 1000 or 1005 leaving conf, it sends BYE and removes entry. So, next call to 3200 may be sent to the wrong FS. Ok, we have a unique entry ($fU:$rU). Checking for active destination: if (sht_match_name("fsdest", "re", ":$rU")) {} If there's an htable with $rU in key - we got a match. Now we need to assign a value from htable to $du. But, I don't know how to get the name of this entry. There's always different $fU: (or $rU if we check for the same caller ID ($fU)). eg: 1000 --> 3200 = htbale 1000 --> 3200 New call 1005 --> 3200 Check sht_match name ":3200" - got match We need to set: $du = $sht(fsdest=>$fU:$rU) But it will be $sht(fsdest=>1005:3200) and we don't have this entry. We need (fsdest=>1003:3200) But i don't see any way to get needed $fU. *Is there any way to search or identify these tables?* ============================================================================================= ============================================================================================= Can someone help me with this, please? :-) Or maybe there is a better way to do this? *My kamailio.cfg routing block in pastebin, if neededhttps://pastebin.com/1PZ0QSDW <https://pastebin.com/1PZ0QSDW>* Thank you! Regards, Tim [View Less]

4 5

Info: Kamailio World 2021 starting soon - live stream
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 10 Sep '21

10 Sep '21

Hello, to sync better on time, Kamailio World 2021 online edition is starting in about 2 hours from now (12:50 UTC Welcome and 13:00UTC the first session) - the agenda is available at: * https://kamailioworld.com/k09-online/ In short: participation is free, no registration is needed. The sessions are live streamed to YouTube KamailioWorld channel: * https://www.youtube.com/c/KamailioWorld/ YouTube chat next to the live stream can be used for addressing questions to speakers -… [View More]

5 9

RPC usrloc ul.add problem
by Pepelux 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

Hi all I have problems adding a new location by RPC command. *# kamailio -v* version: kamailio 5.5.0 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE … [View More]1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 8.3.0 A simple example, adding an AOR which expires in 1 hour: *# date ; kamcmd ul.add kam_location 1002-test1(a)sipserver.com <1002-test1(a)sipserver.com> sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 <sip%3A1002-test1(a)192.168.89.82> 3600 0.0 . 0 0 0 .* Wed 08 Sep 2021 01:58:00 PM CEST Location record has been inserted correctly: *# date ; kamcmd ul.dump | grep test -A24* Wed 08 Sep 2021 01:58:02 PM CEST AoR: 1002-test1(a)sipserver.com HashID: -597689288 Contacts: { Contact: { Address: sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 Expires: 3598 Q: 0.000000 Call-ID: dfjrewr12386fd6-343(a)kamailio.rpc CSeq: 1 User-Agent: kamailio SIP Router - RPC Server Received: [not set] Path: [not set] State: CS_SYNC Flags: 0 CFlags: 0 Socket: [not set] Methods: 0 Ruid: ulcx-61389f47-2e44-01 Instance: [not set] Reg-Id: 0 Server-Id: 0 Tcpconn-Id: 0 Keepalive: 0 Last-Keepalive: 1631102280 KA-Roundtrip: 0 Last-Modified: 0 } } } But a few seconds later, the location record has gone: * # date ; kamcmd ul.dump | grep test -A24* Wed 08 Sep 2021 01:58:26 PM CEST In kamailio logs I can see that: * Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_rpc.c:637]: ul_rpc_add(): path == 0 -> unset Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_rpc.c:652]: ul_rpc_add(): ret: 10 table:kam_location aor:1002-test1@sipserver.com <aor%3A1002-test1(a)sipserver.com> contact:sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 <contact%3Asip%3A1002-test1(a)192.168.89.82> expires:3600 dtemp:0.000000 path: flags:0 bflags:0 methods:0 Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ul_rpc.c:660]: ul_rpc_add(): q:0 Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:00 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11844]: DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1868]: uldb_insert_attrs(): no location attributes* Sep 8 13:58:03 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11827]: DEBUG: {1 81337 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:03 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11827]: DEBUG: {1 81337 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:03 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11827]: DEBUG: {1 81337 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 141 REGISTER 1aa357700bd0696702c40340595d89e7(a)185.99.186.215 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 141 REGISTER 1aa357700bd0696702c40340595d89e7(a)185.99.186.215 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 141 REGISTER 1aa357700bd0696702c40340595d89e7(a)185.99.186.215 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:06 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11852]: DEBUG: {1 114 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:06 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11852]: DEBUG: {1 114 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:06 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11852]: DEBUG: {1 114 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 12484 REGISTER 1382185578-19234-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BGC REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 12484 REGISTER 1382185578-19234-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BGC REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 12484 REGISTER 1382185578-19234-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BGC REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes * Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11835]: DEBUG: usrloc [urecord.c:377]: wb_timer(): tcp connection has been lost, expiring contact sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 <sip%3A1002-test1(a)192.168.89.82> Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11835]: DEBUG: usrloc [urecord.c:387]: wb_timer(): Binding '1002-test1(a)sipserver.com <1002-test1(a)sipserver.com>','sip:1002-test1@192.168.89.82 <sip%3A1002-test1(a)192.168.89.82>' has expired Sep 8 13:58:23 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11835]: DEBUG: usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes* Sep 8 13:58:25 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 185389 REGISTER 1487655759-19321-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBB REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:25 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 185389 REGISTER 1487655759-19321-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBB REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:25 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 185389 REGISTER 1487655759-19321-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBB REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:33 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11853]: DEBUG: {1 3360 REGISTER pgmirc5oirbekeaj3tmrf7 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:33 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11853]: DEBUG: {1 3360 REGISTER pgmirc5oirbekeaj3tmrf7 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:33 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11853]: DEBUG: {1 3360 REGISTER pgmirc5oirbekeaj3tmrf7 REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 5645 REGISTER 89744034-6071-1(a)BJC.BGI.A.BJ REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 5645 REGISTER 89744034-6071-1(a)BJC.BGI.A.BJ REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 5645 REGISTER 89744034-6071-1(a)BJC.BGI.A.BJ REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 5683 REGISTER 1974024198-16543-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BDE REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 5683 REGISTER 1974024198-16543-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BDE REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:44 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 5683 REGISTER 1974024198-16543-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BDE REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:50 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 144820 REGISTER 381139623-5062-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BAD REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:50 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 144820 REGISTER 381139623-5062-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BAD REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:50 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11829]: DEBUG: {1 144820 REGISTER 381139623-5062-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BAD REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:58:59 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 84973 REGISTER 467700456-5060-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BCI REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:58:59 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 84973 REGISTER 467700456-5060-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BCI REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:58:59 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11828]: DEBUG: {1 84973 REGISTER 467700456-5060-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BCI REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:59:01 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11854]: DEBUG: {1 116 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:59:01 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11854]: DEBUG: {1 116 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:59:01 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11854]: DEBUG: {1 116 REGISTER 5ne5ebv674tptk0p1uj4gg REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes Sep 8 13:59:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 81338 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1801]: uldb_delete_attrs_ruid(): trying to delete location attributes Sep 8 13:59:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 81338 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:72]: ucontact_xavp_store(): trying to clone per contact xavps Sep 8 13:59:04 sipserver /usr/sbin/kamailio[11830]: DEBUG: {1 81338 REGISTER 1955770655-18357-1(a)BJC.BGI.B.BBF REGISTER} usrloc [ucontact.c:1857]: uldb_insert_attrs(): trying to insert location attributes What am I doing wrong? It is supposed that the connection is by UDP. I also tried to insert the socket value as UDP, but it had the same problem. Thanks! [View Less]

3 6

Topos does not add record-route on invite
by Angelo Sipper 09 Sep '21

09 Sep '21

Hello, We have the following setup on Kamailio 5.3.7 (x86_64/linux) and I am trying to use topos module on Kamailio2 in order to hide our topology but, mostly to reduce the invite size as most of the times we have fragmentation on invites from Kamailio1 as Kamailio1 it adds 2 record-routes and two via as it handles TLS from one side and UDP on the other side and we have found no wat to avoid all this info even with topos enabled on Kamailio1 there is no change on this. UA (OverTLS) -> … [View More]Kamailio1 (Over UDP)-> Kamailio2 (Over UDP)-> Provider UA :50.50.50.50:5065 (TLS) Kamailio1: 170.170.170.210:5061 (TLS),170.170.170.210:5060 (UDP) Kamailio2: 170.170.170.170:5060 (UDP) Provider: 200.200.200.193:5060 (UDP) Kamailio1 does not run topos. Kamailio2 does run topos and rr with bellow settings: # ------ topos ------ modparam("topos", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("topos", "mask_callid", 0) modparam("topos", "sanity_checks", 0) modparam("topos", "branch_expire", 130) # 3 Min modparam("topos", "dialog_expire", 10800) # 3 Hours modparam("topos", "clean_interval", 60) modparam("topos", "event_mode", 3) modparam("topos", "contact_host", " sbc181.myserver.com") # ----- rr params ----- # set next param to 1 to add value to ;lr param (helps with some UAs) modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 0) modparam("rr", "ignore_sips", 1) # 0 = do not append from tag to the RR, 0 = append from tag to the RR modparam("rr", "append_fromtag", 0) # dual RR 0 = No, 1 = Yes when needed 2 = Always modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", 0) The problem is that on the invite from Kamailio2 to provider, topos adds only VIA kai new contact. No record route at all. So the provider sends multiple 200 ok SDPs to wrong IPs. If I disable topos module on kamailio2 everything works fine except that we have huge invite as another VIA and another record route is added having now three of each and fragmentation is present. *Invite from Kamailio1 to Kamailio2* ------------------------------------------------- 2021/09/08 21:41:57.698823 170.170.170.210:5060 -> 170.170.170.181:5060 INVITE sip:1234567890@sip.myserver.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:170.170.170.210;r2=on;lr;ftag=1b973153-4034-4480-89d3-c47b411bd81e;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgEBBwEAAXABAG5BR0EAQUBCZXJ2b2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAoMDgsBBQcGAgIAdENbQG4AFxNUXAUaGQYXWAocY2UuZXU-;did=ff2.96a;nat=yes> Record-Route: <sip:170.170.170.210:5061 ;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=1b973153-4034-4480-89d3-c47b411bd81e;vsf=AAAAAFpUAgEBBwEAAXABAG5BR0EAQUBCZXJ2b2ljZS5ldQ--;vst=AAAAAAoMDgsBBQcGAgIAdENbQG4AFxNUXAUaGQYXWAocY2UuZXU-;did=ff2.96a;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 170.170.170.210;branch=z9hG4bKd703.e095cdba1da1a4b1599119c9135b7838.0;i=8eb41 Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 50.50.50.50:5065 ;received=50.50.50.50;rport=31090;branch=z9hG4bKPj9196e5f9-977c-4a53-a4c0-c0ab82b095da;alias From: 987654321 <sip: 987654321(a)sip.myserver.com >;tag=1b973153-4034-4480-89d3-c47b411bd81e To: <sip: 1234567890(a)sip.myserver.com> Contact: <sip:customer1@50.50.50.50:5065 ;transport=TLS;alias=50.50.50.50~31090~3> Call-ID: cd64414e-77d5-45b4-a52d-74ec7fb5c7ef CSeq: 15776 INVITE Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 Max-Forwards: 69 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 231 P-Asserted-Identity: <sip: 987654321(a)sip.myserver.com> v=0 o=- 391641952 391641952 IN IP4 170.170.170.216 s=Asterisk c=IN IP4 170.170.170.216 t=0 0 m=audio 29478 RTP/AVP 8 0 18 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:29479 a=ptime:20 *Invite from Kamailio2 to Provider* ------------------------------------------------- 2021/09/08 21:41:57.715881 170.170.170.181:5060 -> 200.200.200.193:5060 INVITE sip: 1234567890@sbc181.myserver.com:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 170.170.170.181;branch=z9hG4bKd703.d45db1fd910c43c5e7c4f8711a5fca92.0 From: 987654321 <sip: 987654321(a)sip.myserver.com >;tag=1b973153-4034-4480-89d3-c47b411bd81e To: <sip:1234567890@sip.myserver.com> Call-ID: cd64414e-77d5-45b4-a52d-74ec7fb5c7ef CSeq: 15776 INVITE Supported: 100rel, timer, replaces, norefersub Session-Expires: 1800 Min-SE: 90 Max-Forwards: 68 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 231 P-Asserted-Identity: <sip: 987654321(a)sip.myserver.com> Contact: <sip:btpsh-c9-613903ef-21d75-1@sbc181.myserver.com> v=0 o=- 391641952 391641952 IN IP4 170.170.170.184 s=Asterisk c=IN IP4 170.170.170.184 t=0 0 m=audio 11450 RTP/AVP 8 0 18 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=sendrecv a=rtcp:11451 a=ptime:20 *Bellow you can see the flow* ---------------------------------------- 170.170.170.210:5060 170.170.170.170:5060 200.200.200.193:5060 qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqqqq qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqqqq qqqqqqqqqqwqqqqqqqqq 21:41:57.698823 x INVITE (SDP) x x +0.003788 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x x 21:41:57.702611 x 100 trying -- your call is x x +0.013270 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:41:57.715881 x x INVITE (SDP) x +0.018529 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x 21:41:57.734410 x x 100 Trying x +0.804083 x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:41:58.538493 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.014557 x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:41:58.553050 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +0.483907 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:41:59.036957 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.012009 x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:41:59.048966 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +0.988036 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:00.037002 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.010960 x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:00.047962 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +1.989085 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:02.037047 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.010947 x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:02.047994 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +3.989064 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:06.037058 x x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x +0.008860 x x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:06.045918 x 183 Session Progress (SDP) x x +1.178240 x <<<qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:07.224158 x CANCEL x x +0.002725 x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x x 21:42:07.226883 x x CANCEL x +0.000372 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x 21:42:07.227255 x 200 canceling x x +0.016902 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:07.244157 x x 200 OK x +0.004590 x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:07.248747 x x 487 Request Terminated x +0.003547 x x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x 21:42:07.252294 x x ACK x +0.003737 x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x 21:42:07.256031 x 487 Request Terminated x x +0.001161 x <qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq x x 21:42:07.257192 x ACK x x x qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq> x TCP is out of question from the provider. Any help to use topos or any other module to reduce the size of our invites to avoid fragmentation will be much appreciated! Regards, Angelo [View Less]

2 1

manually append_branch to lookup result
by David Villasmil 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

Hello guys, I'm trying to dynamically add a branch after doing lookup. The user is found, but in some cases I need to add a branch and do parallel forking. So i'm basically doing: route[LOCATION] { if (!lookup("location")) { .... } if (something) { route(BRANCH_TO_EXTRA); } route(RELAY); } route[BRANCH_TO_EXTRA] { $fs = MY_SOCKET; append_branch("sip:$tU@" + $sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_ip) + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.pstn.gw_port)); return; } For some … [View More]

2 5

via header not removed wit hremove_hf()
by Richard Robson 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

during testing I need to remove a Via header This is the code snippet route[REPLACE_VIA] { xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] Start of block\n"); xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] $hdrc(Via) Via headers\n"); if(remove_hf("Via")) { xlog ("L_INFO", "[REPLACE_VIA] removed Via\n"); }… [View More]

2 4

Kamailio and robotics repo
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

Following the promise during the Kamailio world 2021 I share the source code of the Kamailoi and robotics repo: https://github.com/arigativa/robolive

2 1

Manage multiple RTP streams with different TO-tags (forking)
by B. Tietz 07 Sep '21

07 Sep '21

Hello, following situation. I have a Kamailio (5.4) using rtpengine to loadbalance calls. If a call from Alice comes in, Kamailio decides to send the call to Carrier B from Bob. Bobs Phone is ringing and the carrier B send a 183 Session Progress with SDP and To-tag=abcd. The SDP has G722 as codec and port 1234. A few moments later carrier B send a second 183 Session Progress with SDP and TO-tag=fghi. The SDP has G711 as codec and port 5678. This is done, to play some funky music as ringtone -.… [View More]

5 4

Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route
by Huber Andreas 03 Sep '21

03 Sep '21

Hi, We’re still using kamailio 4.4 but we’ll be migrating to 5.0 soon. Cool so it will be fixed when we migrate ! Thanks, Andreas From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.kamailio.org] On Behalf Of Federico Cabiddu Sent: vendredi 12 mai 2017 11:56 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [SR-Users] t_drop_replies not working with t_suspend in failure route Hi, which version are you using? A similar case had been reported some months ago and it should be fixed in 5.0. … [View More]

2 1

How to drop negative final response and send ACK
by Koray Vatansever 02 Sep '21

02 Sep '21

Hi, I have a problem with the following scenario: I have web and mobile sip clients for the same username. If both clients are idle, INVITE is forked and both clients ring. If web client is busy and mobile client is online and registered, the mobile client rings and the caller hears ringback tone. If web client is busy and mobile client is offline, before the mobile client receives push notification and registers, web client sends 486 busy response and caller hears busy tone. In this last … [View More]

2 2

dns_srv_lb on or yes
by Juha Heinanen 01 Sep '21

01 Sep '21

Wiki tells: dns_srv_lb = yes | no (default no) and doc/tutorials/dns.txt tells: dns_srv_lb = on | off Which one is correct or does it matter? -- Juha

2 3

Info: Tomorrow Live - Kamailio World 2021 - Online
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 31 Aug '21

31 Aug '21

Hello, couple of details for those that want to watch live or even participate to Kamailio World Online Conference, Sep 1-2, 2021 - the schedule is available at: * https://www.kamailioworld.com/k09-online/ There is no registration required, participation is completely free. You can watch live the presentations starting with 13:00UTC (14:00 London, 15:00 Berlin/Paris/Rome/Madrid, 09:00 New York) via KamailioWorld youtube channel: * https://www.youtube.com/c/KamailioWorld If … [View More]

1 0

Add PIDF-LO object to INVITE
by Adarsh Chauhan 31 Aug '21

31 Aug '21

Hi All, I am trying to add PIDF-LO XML to INVITE, however i have had little success so far. My end goal is to create an invite like mentioned in https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/office_protocols/ms-sipre/4010da… I have the following config: request_route{ xlog("L_DBG","REQUEST RECEIVED \n ($mb) \n"); if (is_method("INVITE")) { xinfo("$ua\n"); regex_substring("$ua", "([a-f0-9]{12})",0, 1, "$var(asd)"); if($var(asd)!="") { … [View More]http_client_query("http://127.0.0.1/location/$var(asd)","$var(result)"); xdbg("$rc ,[$var(result)]\n"); if(!has_body("application/pidf+xml")) { set_body_multipart("$rb", "application/sdp", "delimiter"); msg_apply_changes(); append_body_part($(var(result){s.unquote}), "application/pidf+xml"); msg_apply_changes(); } }else { xerr("NO MAC ADDRESS FOUND\n"); } } route("forward"); } which achieves the following but doesn't have the xml in the correct format. I have explored most of the modules but couldnt find a handy function for this. INVITE sip:service@10.0.1.133:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 169.254.172.2;branch=z9hG4bK3de6.d3b4cddbcbdba59a3e190c41b06ada15.0;i=1 From: sipp <sip:sipp@1.1.1.1:45907>;tag=21113SIPpTag001 To: service <sip:service@10.0.1.133:5060> Call-ID: 1-21113(a)1.1.1.1 CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: sip:sipp@1.1.1.1:45907 Max-Forwards: 70 Subject: Performance Test Content-Length: 937 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="delimiter" Mime-Version: 1.0 --delimiter Content-Type: application/sdp v=0 o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.31.87.143 s=- c=IN IP4 1.1.1.1 t=0 0 m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 --delimiter Content-Type: application/pidf+xml <?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n<presence xmlns:xsd=\"http:/ /www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema\" xmlns:xsi=\"http://www.w3.org/2001/ XMLSchema-instance\" entity=\"sip:U SER9(a)SBSBVR00Test0m.ABC.com\" xmlns=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf\">\n<tuple id=\"tuple0\">\n<status>\n<geopriv xmlns=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10\">\n<civicAddre ss xmlns=\"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:geopriv10:civicAddr\">\n['<STS>Ave</STS>\\n', '<A1>WA</A1>\\n', '<A3>Redmond</A3>\\n', '<RD>163rd</RD>\\n', '<PC>98052</PC>\\n', '<POD >NE</POD>\\n', '<NAM>Contoso Corporation </NAM>\\n', '<HNO>3910</HNO>\\n', '<country>US</country>\\n']\n</civicAddress>\n</geopriv>\n</status>\n</tuple>\n</presence> --delimiter-- Regards, Adarsh Chauhan [View Less]

1 0

What does "tls.reload" actually do?
by Sebastian Damm 30 Aug '21

30 Aug '21

Hi, I noticed a strange behavior on some of our proxy servers, all running Kamailio 5.3.8. After running for some time (weeks), our monitoring system sporadically starts reporting errors. The check connects via tls and registers to an Asterisk behind the proxy server. When this happens, the Kamailio log shows the following line: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): TLS accept:error:1409441B:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert decrypt error When restarting Kamailio, the problem … [View More]

4 8

Slack Group
by Daniel Donoghue 26 Aug '21

26 Aug '21

Hello everyone Does anybody know if the Slack workspace at kamailio.slack.com (as mentioned on https://www.kamailio.org/w/contact-us/) is still active? If it is, who should we contact for access? With every blessing, — Daniel Donoghue

2 1

pua dialogindo doesn't not generate PUBLISH when routes is written on kemi framework(python)
by Zhan Bazarov 26 Aug '21

26 Aug '21

Hi everyone. I have an issue, when I loaded the kemi python engine - module pua_dialoginfo stopped sending publishes... Has anyone faced the same issue? kamailio version is 5.4.5

1 0

no transaction found so that cant step into route-block
by fran.interpla.56906 26 Aug '21

26 Aug '21

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users