Hi,
and in file digest.c of the module radius_auth:
warning:
digest.c: In function `radius_authorize':
digest.c:79: `PW_SIP_NONCE' undeclared (first use in this function)
digest.c:79: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
digest.c:79: for each function it appears in.)
digest.c:83: `PW_SIP_NONCE_COUNT' undeclared (first use in this function)
Changed
from PW_SIP_NONCE to PW_SIP_USER_NONCE
and
from PW_SIP_NONCE_COUNT to PW_SIP_USER_NONCE_COUNT
which are defined in your new header file "radiusclient.h".
Hope this is ok.
Regards
Yang
Hi,
While trying to compile the module radius_acc I get some warnings as follows:
acc.c: In function `radius_log_reply':
acc.c:142: warning: passing arg 1 of `parse_from_header' from incompatible pointer type
acc.c: In function `radius_log_ack':
acc.c:426: warning: passing arg 1 of `parse_from_header' from incompatible pointer type
acc.c: In function `rad_acc_request':
acc.c:708: warning: passing arg 1 of `parse_from_header' from incompatible pointer type
So I looked into the file acc.c and found such statements like
if ( parse_from_header( msg )==-1 )
Because the function parse_from_header needs a parameter of type hdr_field, I changed the statements above to
if ( parse_from_header( msg->headers )==-1 )
after this the warnings don't appear any longer.
Is this change ok?
Best Regards
Yang
No it is not very stable and it produces a huge executable but it is the
only open source that I am aware off. I also think that the development of
sip2h323gw has stop since the programer that did the development has left
long ago from Vovida. You can also complile this with the new h323 libraries
available from www.h323.org or so I think.
Giorgos Tsiouris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vlasis Hatzistavrou" <vhatz(a)auth.gr>
To: "Giorgos Tsiouris" <gtsiouris(a)telecom.ntua.gr>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] SIP/H.323 Gateway
> Hello Giorgo,
>
> Have you worked with the Vovida sip2h323gw? Is it stable or compatible
with
> other major vendor H323 GW's like Cisco for example?
>
> Best regards,
> Vlasis.
>
> Giorgos Tsiouris wrote:
>
> > There is one SIP to H323 gateway from www.vovida.org . You can download
> > vocal and you can compile only the gateway. I also think that there is
one
> > from siemens (I do not remeber their site) but this is not open source.
> >
> > Giorgos Tsiouris
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ng, Soo Sim" <SooSim.Ng(a)hp.com>
> > To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 1:09 PM
> > Subject: [Serusers] SIP/H.323 Gateway
> >
> > > Is there testing being done SIP end-point to H.323 end-point call and
> > vice-versa. What's the SIP/H.323 gateway being tested?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > SS
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Serusers mailing list
> > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
Hi,
we try to compile ser 0.8.10 with radius support under Solaris 8.
First we have a problem with the radius_acc module. We found s
solution in the mailinglist archive. Now we have a problem with the
radius_auth module. If we compile it we get the following error
message:
digest.c -o digest.o
digest.c: In function `radius_authorize':
digest.c:79: `PW_SIP_NONCE' undeclared (first use in this function)
digest.c:79: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
digest.c:79: for each function it appears in.)
digest.c:83: `PW_SIP_NONCE_COUNT' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c: In function `radius_authorize_freeradius':
digest.c:160: `PW_DIGEST_USER_NAME' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:164: `PW_DIGEST_REALM' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:168: `PW_DIGEST_NONCE' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:172: `PW_DIGEST_URI' undeclared (first use in this function)
digest.c:176: `PW_DIGEST_METHOD' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:184: `PW_DIGEST_QOP' undeclared (first use in this function)
digest.c:192: `PW_DIGEST_CNONCE' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:201: `PW_DIGEST_NONCE_COUNT' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:211: `PW_DIGEST_BODY_DIGEST' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:241: `PW_DIGEST_ALGORITHM' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:252: `PW_DIGEST_ATTRIBUTES' undeclared (first use in this
function)
digest.c:258: `PW_DIGEST_RESPONSE' undeclared (first use in this
function)
gmake: *** [digest.o] Error 1
we think that there some definitions not defined in an header-file. we
included the dict.h file from the radius_acc module(CVS version), so
most of the definitions PW_SIP_* are present.
Is there a possibility to get the missing definitions?
greetings bjoern
Hi,
Can I just cut and paste the script directly into the ser.cfg file?
-Chi
Original Message:
-----------------
From: serusers (Jiri) serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:30:52 +0100
To: chid(a)eglobalcall.com, serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] New Setup of SER
At 01:22 PM 2/11/2003, Chi Dang wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Sorry to be greedy but I have two questions. I've just finished
>installed the ser 0.8 version on Solaris 2.8.
>
>1. When I ran ser, it said it is listening to only 3 servers. I have
>added 2 more into my /etc/hosts file but make no difference. Where does
>ser daemon get the ip of servers that it is listening to?
/etc/hosts configures you resolver and does not affect the interfaces
configured on your host. ser determines existing interfaces but does
not care about your resolver's configuration.
>2. I plan to use ser with my cisco voip gateways. Is there anything
>special that I need to configure ser to make it work with Cisco
>gateways?
Maybe access control
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser-html/x740.html#AEN786
Note that Cisco gateways have no digest support, so you are left
only with source IP address "authentication".
-Jiri
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
Hi,
Sorry to be greedy but I have two questions. I've just finished
installed the ser 0.8 version on Solaris 2.8.
1. When I ran ser, it said it is listening to only 3 servers. I have
added 2 more into my /etc/hosts file but make no difference. Where does
ser daemon get the ip of servers that it is listening to?
2. I plan to use ser with my cisco voip gateways. Is there anything
special that I need to configure ser to make it work with Cisco
gateways?
Thanks,
Chi Dang
Hi,
I am working on a 3rd Party Call Control implementation. Is it possible
to get notifyed as a 3rd Party (SER owner) when Sip Party A connects SIP
Party B?
Thank you!
karsten
Hi Daniel,
Ok, I found a configuration error on ser.cfg. On the Jaddress parameter the
Ip address had a sintax error (one of the dots was replaceded by a comma).
But now there is another problem:
- When the sip client (messenger) sends a IM to the Jabber client, the
jabber client do not receive the message but he is "notified" that the
sip-client is on-line.
- When the jabber client send an IM to the sip client the messages is
received by the sip client.
Any idea of what is going on?
Best regards,
Toni
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin MIERLA [mailto:mierla@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: sexta-feira, 31 de Janeiro de 2003 18:30
To: Toni Barata (EPS)
Subject: Re: [Serusers] user permission problem on ser-jabber gw
You have to set debug=9 and log_stderror=yes in ser's config file.
Debug messages will be displayed on console and you can copy/paste in a
file.
If you got that error message, means that ser-jabber gw was connected to
Jabber server, but something was happening and the connection was broken. So
some messages should have been exchanged between ser and Jabber. Did you
check all your network interfaces (I told you in last mail you have to sniff
loopback interface if Jabber server and ser is on the same machine)?
Regards,
Daniel
Toni Barata (EPS) wrote:
Hi,
I forgot to tell you that I put the ethereal sniffing the network and no
packet was sent by the ser-jabber gw to the port 5222 on the jabber server.
I seems that this is an internal problem on the ser-jabber. Is there a way
to send the logs to a file?
Best regards,
Toni
hello,
we are using ser 0.8.10.
it worked fine with SIP methods.
we would like to know whether we can use the ser to test the simple methods (simple, subscribe and notify methods)
with thanks and regards,
Anuradha
--
**************************************************************
eRiva provides IT Solutions & Services to companies worldwide.
Our State of the Art Research & Development Center provides
Innovative Solutions to global customers.
eRiva's unique value proposition is further delivered through our
Offshore Outsourcing Model and stringent Quality Processes
of SEI / ISO and Six Sigma. [www.erivasystems.com]
**************************************************************
--
Folks,
There is a bug in ser, which results in different hashes to be
generated if some of the fields participating in hash generation has
extra spaces before value in reply that were not present in request,
i.e.:
request:
From: <vasia_pupkin(a)1.2.3.4>
reply:
From: <vasia_pupkin(a)1.2.3.4>
This leads to matching failure and as a result causes useless
retransmition, if tm module is used. For example, Vovida's SIP stack
is found to be guilty in inserting extra spaces into reply's headers
(which isn't really prohibited by the RFC).
Attached little patch should fix the problem. It would be nice to have
it integrated into the next release.
Thanks!
-Maxim
Hi,
I was wondering whether there is a ser module for SIP-CGI. Or whether there
are attempts at creating one? If so, could anyone point me in the right
direction?
thanks,
Stephan
--
Dr Stephan Reiff-Marganiec
Research Fellow
Department of Computing Science; University of Stirling
email: srm(a)cs.stir.ac.uk tel: 01786 46 7448
--
The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may
be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated
in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this
message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise
immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official
business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Hello,
I'm trying to setup the radius accounting module but SER craches wherever I make a call. The call does complete, but the core is generated a couple seconds later. Without rad_acc moudule SER works fine, so I assume this have something to do with the module.
I'm attaching some resumed debugs for the crash. I also have the complete debug (log level 10), wich is quite big so I decided not so send it to the list unless the following debugs are not enough.
Any ideas on what's the problem?
Thanks and regards,
Claudio Thorell
###########
...
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b5174), called from parser/msg_parser.c: free_sip_msg(487)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from action.c: do_action(346)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b5090), called from parser/parse_via.c: free_via_param_list(1816)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/parse_via.c: parse_via(1642)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b52ec), called from parser/parse_via.c: free_via_list(1828)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: get_hdr_field(85)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b5128), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4ff0), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4fa4), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b46cc), called from parser/parse_to.c: free_to(741)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/parse_to.c: parse_to_param(265)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b482c), called from parser/parse_to.c: free_to(744)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: get_hdr_field(123)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b479c), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b51dc), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b47e8), called from parser/parse_cseq.c: free_cseq(94)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: get_hdr_field(104)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b5228), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4f58), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b50dc), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4c70), called from parser/hf.c: free_hdr_field_lst(103)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4d08), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(248)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from data_lump.c: del_lump(153)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b475c), called from data_lump.c: free_lump(212)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from textops.c: append_hf(231)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4418), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(237)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from data_lump.c: insert_new_lump_before(129)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4cbc), called from data_lump.c: free_lump_list(248)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from data_lump.c: anchor_lump(183)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b54bc), called from parser/msg_parser.c: free_sip_msg(493)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from receive.c: receive_msg(83)
6(24956) qm_free(0x80adf80, 0x80b4adc), called from receive.c: receive_msg(177)
6(24956) qm_free: freeing block alloc'ed from receive.c: receive_msg(63)
6(24956) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 356) called from receive.c: receive_msg(63)
6(24956) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 356) returns address 0x80b4adc on 0 -th hit
6(24956) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 415) called from receive.c: receive_msg(83)
6(24956) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 416) returns address 0x80b54bc on 0 -th hit
6(24956) SIP Request:
6(24956) method: <ACK>
6(24956) uri: <sip:1005@200.219.173.141;branch=0>
6(24956) version: <SIP/2.0>
6(24956) parse_headers: flags=1
6(24956) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 28) called from parser/msg_parser.c: parse_headers(229)
6(24956) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 28) returns address 0x80b4cbc on 0 -th hit
6(24956) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 104) called from parser/msg_parser.c: get_hdr_field(85)
6(24956) qm_malloc(0x80adf80, 104) returns address 0x80b52ec on 0 -th hit
0(24946) child process 24961 exited by a signal 11
0(24946) core was generated
0(24946) INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD
4(24954) Memory status (pkg):
4(24954) qm_status (0x80adf80):
4(24954) heap size= 1022872
4(24954) used= 1040, used+overhead=27272, free=995600
4(24954) max used (+overhead)= 27340
4(24954) dumping all allocked. fragments:
...
Dan Austin's howto (see SER webpage) is probably the currently most
extensive documentation available.
-Jiri
At 05:16 PM 2/6/2003, Jerry Yin wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Can somebody tell me how to configure the serweb? Which directory should I
>put those files and which file and parameters should I modify. Or maybe this
>question was asked previously by somebody already, then please provide me a
>like to those answers.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jerry Yin
>Mitel Networks.
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Hi All,
Can somebody tell me how to configure the serweb? Which directory should I
put those files and which file and parameters should I modify. Or maybe this
question was asked previously by somebody already, then please provide me a
like to those answers.
Thanks,
Jerry Yin
Mitel Networks.
Hi!
I'm really very sorry that I have wasted your time - I've made a really
stupid mistake.
Now I fixed the proper line (103) and everything works fine. No messages
in the log file, no crashes.
Thanks a lot!
Klaus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Janak [mailto:J.Janak@sh.cvut.cz]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:45 PM
> To: Klaus Darilion
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser crashes
>
>
> On 06-02 16:25, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> > My experience is the following:
> >
> > Line 109 in t_msgbuilder.c:
> >
> > len += USER_AGENT_LEN + CRLF_LEN;
> > ==> ser crashes when I send the special invite!
> >
> > *len += USER_AGENT_LEN + CRLF_LEN;
> > ==> ser doesn't crash but logs this in /val/log/messages:
> > Feb 6 15:48:24 obelix /usr/local/sbin/ser[6985]: ERROR:
> > t_build_and_send_CANCEL: cannot allocate memory
> >
> >
> > hope my explanation is a little bit clearer now:
> > i also downloaded
> > ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/ser/0.8.10/src/ser-0.8.10_src.tar.gz
> > and this tarball contains: *len += USER_AGENT_LEN + CRLF_LEN;
> >
>
> That's another line, look at line 103:
>
> len+=((hdr->body.s+hdr->body.len ) - hdr->name.s ) +
> CRLF_LEN;
>
> This should be changed to:
>
> *len+=((hdr->body.s+hdr->body.len ) - hdr->name.s ) +
> CRLF_LEN;
>
> regards, Jan.
>
>
My experience is the following:
Line 109 in t_msgbuilder.c:
len += USER_AGENT_LEN + CRLF_LEN;
==> ser crashes when I send the special invite!
*len += USER_AGENT_LEN + CRLF_LEN;
==> ser doesn't crash but logs this in /val/log/messages:
Feb 6 15:48:24 obelix /usr/local/sbin/ser[6985]: ERROR:
t_build_and_send_CANCEL: cannot allocate memory
hope my explanation is a little bit clearer now:
i also downloaded
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/ser/0.8.10/src/ser-0.8.10_src.tar.gz
and this tarball contains: *len += USER_AGENT_LEN + CRLF_LEN;
regards,
klaus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Janak [mailto:J.Janak@sh.cvut.cz]
> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 4:19 PM
> To: Klaus Darilion
> Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] ser crashes
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On 06-02 16:02, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> > Thank you, the path to the modules was the problem!
> >
> > Now ser runs also as self compiled version and doesnt
> crash. I didn't
> > had to change the source because the source code available
> to download
> > is already corrected. To proof your guess I inserted the
> error again (
> > len+=) and than it crashes again.
>
> ser-0.8.10_src.tar.gz has this bug too.
>
> > Conclusion: with the source code version from 0.8.10 ser
> doesn't crash
> > anymore. Nevertheless, /var/log/messages shows an error
> message when I
> > send my special invite:
> >
> > Feb 6 15:48:24 obelix /usr/local/sbin/ser[6985]: ERROR:
> > t_build_and_send_CANCEL: cannot allocate memory
>
> That's the bug I told you about, AFAIK it is caused by the missing
> dereference operator in t_msgbuilder.c. See my previous email for
> description how to fix it. (rewrite len+= to *len+=, recompile and
> reinstall).
>
> regards, Jan.
>
>
Looking at log files may help you to discover the issue. It is very likely
that the module paths are different for the compiled than for the installed
modules.
-jiri
At 03:19 PM 2/6/2003, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I have problems running the self compiled ser version (without any
>sourcecode changes).
>
>I uninstalled the rpms ("rpm -e ser-mysql" and "rpm -e ser" - I use the
>mysql authentication). Then I compiled ser with "make all" without
>errors. I installed ser with "make install". Then I tried to start ser
>with:
># /usr/local/sbin/ser -f /etc/ser/ser.cfg
>ERROR: bad config file (25 errors)
>
>Why does my config file doesn't work anymore (it worked with the rpm
>version)?
Hi,
Thanks for the Reply.
I am using the SER server with the default configuration.
Infact I have not installed the SQL database also.
I am using the SER 0.8.10 verison.
With Linux 7.3 as OS.
I registered with the following SIP URI to SER server from two different machines.
sip:anuradha@there.com
sip:LittleGuy@there.com
It registered Successfully.
But When I sent an INVITE request from sip:anuradha@there.com
to LittleGuy(a)there.com it gives the server error.
Thanks
Geetha
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Jiri Kuthan <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 19:13:48 +0100
>Please send a complete description of the case:
>full network dumps, your configuration file, your
>logs and information about version of ser and OS
>you are using.
>
>Thank you,
>
>-Jiri
>
>At 02:02 PM 2/5/2003, Geetha Shree wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am new to SIP.
>>I have installed the SER server and my REGISTER method is working ok.
>>But when I send the INVITE method I am getting the following error from SER server.
>>
>>The invite packet which has been sent by me is:
>>
>>INVITE sip:anuradha@there.com SIP/2.0
>>From: <sip:LittleGuy@there.com>;tag=1044365919410
>>To: <sip:anuradha@there.com >
>>Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.9:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1159de0c6cca18f9131c8ff342527668
>>CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>Call-Id: a1371c790546f9a2df76be1f59f6a7dc(a)192.168.1.9
>>Contact: <sip:192.168.1.9:5060;transport=UDP>
>>Content-Length: 0
>>
>>192.168.1.9 is my SER server's address
>>
>>The response got from the SER server is:
>>
>>SIP/2.0 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occured (1/SL)
>>From: <sip:LittleGuy@there.com>;tag=1044365919410
>>To: <sip:anuradha@there.com>;tag=d907c037823644515dfe0ede38ca9976.3592
>>Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.9:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1159de0c6cca18f9131c8ff342527668;received=192.168.1.21
>>CSeq: 1 INVITE
>>Call-Id: a1371c790546f9a2df76be1f59f6a7dc(a)192.168.1.9
>>Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux))
>>Content-Length: 0
>>Warning: 392 192.168.1.9:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=1587 req_src_ip=192.168.1.21 in_uri=sip:LittleGuy@there.com out_uri=sip:LittleGuy@there.com via_cnt==1"
>>
>>Can you help on this please
>>
>>Thanks in advance
>>Geetha
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
Folks,
we've been asked frequently questions "when will be the next release
out", "what new features can I be looking forward to", "will the next ser
release include a b2bua", etc. This update gives you answers to some
of these question, don't hesitate to ask me if you want to know more.
Also, on this opportunity I would like to thank wholeheartly to our
contributors -- they came up with many excellent ideas, running code
and their work has been a great encouragement to us.
New Features
------------
- presence agent and presence support in SIMPLE2Jabber gateway
- dynamic domain management (simplifies hosting multiple domains,
which was quite manual work till now)
- enum support
- nathelper module for getting over NATs with ATAs
- beta-version of voicemail
- 3261-alignment: support for TCP and loose-routing
- accounting improved, reporting to serweb's "missed calls"
now possible
There is many other tiny useful things: exec module was made more
comfortable, support for powerPC was introduced, CC-Diversion
support for talking to Cisco gateways, netbsd support, ser is now
64 bits clean, and generally lot of clean-ups were applied to keep
code-base sane in spite of all the new features. All bugs reported
so far have been fixed. User's guide documents more usage scenarios
with more examples.
Performance has been boosted too -- we achieved 5kCPS with a tuned
ser version for stateful forwarding without user location. Good for
dealing with many stress situations.
There are also many other things frequently asked for, which will
not be part of the next release. The most frequently asked one,
b2bua, for example. If you miss a feature urgently, implementing and
contributing it may be quicker than waiting until someone else
does that. We will be glad to provide guidance. Features that have
been asked until now and I have not forgotten are b2bua, FCP client,
SIP Address Translator.
When
----
I better don't tell you -- I would set your expectations and they
would lead to disappointment if it takes longer than hoped for
(which simply happens too often). I hope to have a pre-alpha,
testers-only release in course of February -- and we will invite
all impatient testers to use it.
SIP Accounts
------------
Don't forget -- you don't need to run your own server -- if all you
need is a SIP account, get one from iptel at
http://www.iptel.org/user/reg/index.php, of course ser-powered :-)
-Jiri on behalf of all who have contributed to SER advancement
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Hi,
I am new to SIP.
I have installed the SER server and my REGISTER method is working ok.
But when I send the INVITE method I am getting the following error from SER server.
The invite packet which has been sent by me is:
INVITE sip:anuradha@there.com SIP/2.0
From: <sip:LittleGuy@there.com>;tag=1044365919410
To: <sip:anuradha@there.com >
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.9:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1159de0c6cca18f9131c8ff342527668
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Call-Id: a1371c790546f9a2df76be1f59f6a7dc(a)192.168.1.9
Contact: <sip:192.168.1.9:5060;transport=UDP>
Content-Length: 0
192.168.1.9 is my SER server's address
The response got from the SER server is:
SIP/2.0 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occured (1/SL)
From: <sip:LittleGuy@there.com>;tag=1044365919410
To: <sip:anuradha@there.com>;tag=d907c037823644515dfe0ede38ca9976.3592
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.9:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1159de0c6cca18f9131c8ff342527668;received=192.168.1.21
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Call-Id: a1371c790546f9a2df76be1f59f6a7dc(a)192.168.1.9
Server: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/linux))
Content-Length: 0
Warning: 392 192.168.1.9:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=1587 req_src_ip=192.168.1.21 in_uri=sip:LittleGuy@there.com out_uri=sip:LittleGuy@there.com via_cnt==1"
Can you help on this please
Thanks in advance
Geetha
Hi,
We have had a strange crash in the SER server we use. The load was not that big
- around 10 users being served at that time. All of a sudden, the server stops
responding and reports the following error in /var/log/messages:
Feb 4 14:41:35 sip kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 3780 (ser).
Feb 4 14:54:52 sip kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 3857 (ser).
Feb 4 14:58:08 sip last message repeated 10 times
Feb 4 15:02:17 sip kernel: Out of Memory: Killed process 3860 (ser).
Feb 4 15:13:32 sip last message repeated 66 times
[continues.....]
Has someone else met this before?
Jaime
*******************************************************************************
Important.
Confidentiality: This communication is intended for the above-named person and
may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any opinions expressed in this
communication are not necessarily those of the company. If it has come to you
in error you must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to
anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the sender immediately.
Monitoring/Viruses
Orange may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current
legislation. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
Orange PCS Limited is a subsidiary of Orange SA and is registered in England No
2178917, with its address at St James Court, Great Park Road, Almondsbury Park,
Bradley Stoke, Bristol BS32 4QJ.
*******************************************************************************
I just read the "ser status update" from jiri and he wrote in the "new
features" section:
- 3261-alignment: support for TCP and loose-routing
So I think this will be fixed in the next release?
Klaus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klaus Darilion
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:19 AM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Cc: Aymeric Moizard
> Subject: [Serusers] Routing with ser / Problems with linphone
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I've installed ser (sip:obelix.ict.tuwien.ac.at) und want'ed
> to use it with linphone, so I configured linphone to use ser
> as outbound proxy and registrar. The registration works fine
> but not the INVITEs. ser answers to an INVITE from linphone
> with a 404 Not Found and I found out that the problem is the
> "Route" header in the INVITE from linphone.
>
> Route: <sip:obelix.ict.tuwien.ac.at;lr>
>
> When I remove the header from the invite and send it manually
> (sipsak) the ser proxy accepts the invite and forwards it. I
> think ser reacts wrong because if an RFC3261 proxy gets an
> request with a route header which points to itself it should
> remove the header and forward the request.
>
> Than I tried the same with an different proxy in the route header:
>
> Route: <sip:iptel.org;lr>
>
> Now, my ser proxy (sip:obelix.ict.tuwien.ac.at) accepts the
> request and forwards it to iptel.org, but it rewrites the
> invite to: INVITE sip:iptel.org;lr SIP/2.0
>
> Thats what an RFC2543 proxy would do, but not an RFC3261
> proxy, which only is allowed to do that if the route header
> has no "lr" parameter or if he is responsible for the domain
> in the request URI. If there is an "lr" parameter the proxy
> must not change the request URI.
>
> If I'm wrong please let me know.
>
> I use ser 0.8.10 with the standard config file and linphone
> 0.9.1 & 0.10.0
>
> Regards,
> Klaus
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
Hello!
I've installed ser (sip:obelix.ict.tuwien.ac.at) und want'ed to use it
with linphone, so I configured linphone to use ser as outbound proxy and
registrar. The registration works fine but not the INVITEs. ser answers
to an INVITE from linphone with a 404 Not Found and I found out that the
problem is the "Route" header in the INVITE from linphone.
Route: <sip:obelix.ict.tuwien.ac.at;lr>
When I remove the header from the invite and send it manually (sipsak)
the ser proxy accepts the invite and forwards it. I think ser reacts
wrong because if an RFC3261 proxy gets an request with a route header
which points to itself it should remove the header and forward the
request.
Than I tried the same with an different proxy in the route header:
Route: <sip:iptel.org;lr>
Now, my ser proxy (sip:obelix.ict.tuwien.ac.at) accepts the request and
forwards it to iptel.org, but it rewrites the invite to:
INVITE sip:iptel.org;lr SIP/2.0
Thats what an RFC2543 proxy would do, but not an RFC3261 proxy, which
only is allowed to do that if the route header has no "lr" parameter or
if he is responsible for the domain in the request URI. If there is an
"lr" parameter the proxy must not change the request URI.
If I'm wrong please let me know.
I use ser 0.8.10 with the standard config file and linphone 0.9.1 &
0.10.0
Regards,
Klaus
Nils,
Thanks! Setting listen=sip.voiping.com worked. I had listen=192.70.239.1
(which the reverse DNS records resolve to: voiping.com). So, that worked.
Thanks for the help and the quick response.
Regarding "not forking" it was purely for debugging purposes. It'll work
now with fork=yes.
Now I have:
fork=yes
log_stderr=no
alias=voiping.comlisten=sip.voiping.com
Later,
L.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nils Ohlmeier [mailto:nils@ohlmeier.de]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Lenny Tropiano; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Cc: 'VoIPing, LLC (IT Consulting)'
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Initial setup on FreeBSD of ser using Cisco 7960 SIP
Hi,
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 19:09, Lenny Tropiano wrote:
> I'm "playing" with SER trying to understand how it all works, and to
> be completely honest I haven't finished reading all the docs.
> Basically I'm using the default ser.cfg (installed in
> /usr/local/etc/ser) and I have two 7960s with the latest SIP code. I
> know it works, since I can call the other phone with our
> user(a)iptel.org extension ... The 2nd line is setup to register to
> sip.voiping.com [192.70.239.1]. Immediately the phone gets to trying,
> I have ser running to "not fork, debug 3, and log to stderr".
Is their any special reason why you not allow to fork?
Because from the repsonse packet bellow you can see that your request is
going
through end (nearly) endless loop. The via_cnt==12 means the request was
forwarded 12 times (before it was stoped by the maxfws rule).
I guess that ser cant detect that sip.voiping.com is one of its "myself"
names. Maybe this is caused by the 'fork=no'. If not you can try to add
'listen=sip.voiping.com' to your configuration or the commandline switch '-l
sip.voiping.com'. This should fix your problem.
Regards
Nils Ohlmeier
I'm "playing" with SER trying to understand how it all works, and to be
completely honest I haven't finished reading all the docs. Basically I'm
using the default ser.cfg (installed in /usr/local/etc/ser) and I have two
7960s with the latest SIP code. I know it works, since I can call the other
phone with our user(a)iptel.org extension ... The 2nd line is setup to
register to sip.voiping.com [192.70.239.1]. Immediately the phone gets to
trying, I have ser running to "not fork, debug 3, and log to stderr".
ngrep indicates the following:
U 192.70.239.150:53087 -> 192.70.239.1:5060
REGISTER sip:sip.voiping.com SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
192.70.239.150:5060..From: sip:lenny@sip.voiping.com..To: sip:lenny@sip.
voiping.com..Call-ID:
00036b54-b62d1fe8-314ef9d4-1cca7f7b@192.70.239.150..Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003
18:07:32 GMT..CSeq: 101 REGIST
ER..User-Agent: CSCO/4..Contact:
<sip:lenny@192.70.239.150:5060>..Content-Length: 0..Expires: 3600....
#
U 192.70.239.1:5060 -> 192.70.239.150:5060
SIP/2.0 483 Too Many Hops..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.70.239.150:5060..From:
sip:lenny@sip.voiping.com..To: sip:lenny@sip.voiping.com
;tag=e755c894a31056969aa313d5267cd575.f7b7..Call-ID:
00036b54-b62d1fe8-314ef9d4-1cca7f7b@192.70.239.150..CSeq: 101 REGISTER..Se
rver: Sip EXpress router (0.8.10 (i386/freebsd))..Content-Length:
0..Warning: 392 192.70.239.1:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=
71976 req_src_ip=192.70.239.1 in_uri=sip:sip.voiping.comout_uri=sip:sip.voiping.com via_cnt==12"....
I would appreciate any advice in getting this going (btw, I compiled the
version of SER 0.8.10 and didn't use the already compiled binaries).
Thanks,
Lenny
---
Lenny Tropiano E-mail: lenny(a)voiping.com
Partner, Networking Specialist Pager: pager-lenny(a)voiping.com
VoIPing, LLC URL: http://www.voiping.com/
PO Box 867, Cedar Park, TX 78630-0867 Mobile: 512-698-VOIP [8647]
Folks,
We are currently trying to implement owerflow routing with sip and b2bua.
Our network setup looks like the following (two GWs here is for simplicity,
actually there would be dozens of them):
---------
/--|PSTN GW|-\
---- ----------------- ------- /~~~~~~\/ --------- \ /~~~~~~~~\
|UA|--|PROXY/REGISTRAR|--|B2BUA|--<IP CLOUD> <PSTN CLOUD>
---- ----------------- ------- \______/\ --------- / \________/
\--|PSTN GW|-/
---------
Since potentially each destination in the PSTN could be reached through
more than one GW we would like to use that for adding some more robustness
to the system, beause from time to time some of gateways might be unavailable
for one reason of another (network outage, maintenance, overload etc.).
t_on_negative() looks like a pretty suitable feature for the job modulo
that we need to add some scheme for distinguishing real failures, such as
"number is busy", from transient ones.
The problem here is that b2bua is unable to do prefix-based routing, while
we can't put b2bua between the UA and PROXY because for accounting reasons
we should be able to get from b2bua IP number of the gateway the call was
forwarded to. Therefore, we do gateway selection based on prefix in ser
(using rewritehostport) and then just forward request to the b2bua using
t_relay_to(). To catch failures and perform retries we use t_on_negative()
and number of reply_route[] blocks and it is where the problem lies -
after appending a new branch ser forwards the request to the host:port
specified in the uri directly, but not through the b2bua.
Attached patch adds a new variable sticky_relay_to, which if set to non-zero
value instructs ser to record proxy address to which transaction was
originally forwarded with t_relay_to(). On failure ser forwards request to
that address if another branch was appended in reply_route[].
I think that it is generally useful feature and it would be nice to see
it integrated into the next release.
Thanks!
-Maxim
Hi,
I have installed SER on linux and created a few users. I can register
these users from SIP phones and soft-phones and can also establish
connections between them. I have also created a user on the
iptel.org server.
I can ring from a client registered with my domain (cs.stir.ac.uk) the
client registered with iptel.org. It works perfectly. However, ringing
from the client registered with iptel.org a client registered locally
doesn't work.
Is this a config problem? How can I fix this?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Best regards,
Mario Kolberg
--
Mario Kolberg phone: +44 (0)1786 46 7440
Lecturer in Computing Science fax : +44 (0)1786 46 4551
email: mko(a)cs.stir.ac.uk
Department of Computing Science and Mathematics
University of Stirling
Stirling FK9 4LA
Scotland, UK
--
The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA. Privileged/Confidential Information may
be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated
in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful. In such case, you should destroy this
message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise
immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other
information in this message that do not relate to the official
business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
given nor endorsed by it.
Hello,
I'm trying to use the presence agent that is in the CVS version.
I added the module and the lines
----
if (method=="SUBSCRIBE") {
subscribe("registrar");
break;
};
----
to my ser.cfg file. By changing this I get the following error message when
trying to "sign in" with the msn messenger UA:
----
15(23129) ERROR: t_reply: cannot send a t_reply to a message for which no
T-state has been established
15(23129) send_reply(): Error while sending 200 OK
----
What does this mean?
I admit I don't know a lot about the details of the SIP protocol, but if you'd
give me a hint on where to search, it'd help me a lot.
Is the presence agent in CVS already usable at all? If yes, could someone
please provide me a working config file?
Thanks in advance,
Stefan Schmidt
Hi,
I have set up the SER and its working. The only problem is I cant get the routing logic to simultaneously route to either the User Loc or the PSTN. Its only doing one of the other.
I am new to SIP, can u show me a sample script that will do both at the same time?
Best regards,
Phillip
Hi,
I have successfully (I think that) installed SER server with ser-mysql
package.
I have set the environment variable 'SIP_DOMAIN="192.168.11.237"' (that is
server IP address).
I have succesfully added a user to subscriber table: 'serctl add ivan
ivanpswd ivan(a)hotmail.com', but registering WM to server fails:
URI = 'ivan(a)192.168.11.237'
Passwowd = 'ivanpswd'
User = 'ivan'
This is my ser.cfg file:
# ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------
debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
fork=yes
log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E)
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
# ------------------ module loading ----------------------------------
loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so"
loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so"
loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so"
loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so"
loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so"
loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so"
loadmodule "//usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so"
# ----------------- setting module-specific parameters ---------------
modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("auth", "db_url", "sql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser")
modparam("auth", "calculate_ha1", yes)
modparam("auth", "password_column", "password")
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
alias="engiweb.com"
alias="sip.engiweb.com"
route{
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
if (len_gt( max_len )) {
sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big");
break;
};
rewriteFromRoute();
if (uri=~"^sip:(.+@)?(192\.168\.11\.237|(sip\.)?engiweb\.com)([:;\?].*)?$")
{
if (method=="REGISTER") {
if (!www_authorize("192.168.11.237", "subscriber")) {
if (!proxy_authorize("192.168.11.237", "subscriber")) {
www_challenge("engiweb.org", "0");
break;
};
save("location");
break;
};
lookup("aliases");
if (!lookup("location")) {
sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found");
break;
};
};
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
}
What could be the problem?
Best regards.
Ivan Vignola.
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Extra Storage: piena libertà di esprimersi e comunicare
http://www.msn.it/msnservizi/es/extra_storage_tag/
Hi Daniel,
The problem related with the permition to use de jabber gateway seems to be
solved.
Now I have a new problem. In the same scenario (Messenger sending a message
to Jabber client) the messenger receives from the jabber gw the following
error message:
" ERROR:Connection to Jabber server lost. You have to login to Jabber server
again (join the conferences again that you were participating,
too)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />"
Can you figure what is happening here?
Thanks,
Toni
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin MIERLA [mailto:mierla@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: sexta-feira, 31 de Janeiro de 2003 12:51
To: Toni Barata (EPS)
Cc: 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
Subject: Re: [Serusers] user permission problem on ser-jabber gw
Hello,
the SIP_ID field must be the SIP URI of the SIP user (e.g. '
sip:user1@mydomain.com <mailto:sip:user1@mydomain.com> ') -- that is for
fast matching - From tag includes sip: in address of the origin. If you
check the manual or the mail I pointed, the samples show that.
Toni Barata (EPS) wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I have done this (creating the database sip_jab) before sending my first
email.
Regarding the association of SIP users with Jabber IDs, I have added an
entry on table jusers this way on mysql:
mysql> INSERT INTO jusers VALUES
('1','user1','user1',' user1(a)mydomain.com <mailto:user1@mydomain.com>
','0');
Should it be done this way or there are others ways to do it?
If you take the sources of the module, in directory 'doc' you can find some
perl or php scripts which can help you. You have to change the values from
the beginning of scripts according with your configuration.
The same problem persists.
Try again now.
Regards,
Daniel
Regards,
Toni
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin MIERLA [ mailto:mierla@fokus.fraunhofer.de
<mailto:mierla@fokus.fraunhofer.de> ]
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Janeiro de 2003 19:54
To: Toni Barata (EPS)
Cc: ' serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org> '
Subject: Re: [Serusers] user permission problem on ser-jabber gw
Hello,
you have to create the database for SIMPLE2Jabber gateway and after that
you have to associate SIP users with Jabber IDs.
I wrote a manual for gateway, but is more related to next ser release.
Anyway, the database is the same, exported methods too, only some
parameters has changed. The database can be created using sql script
from CVS
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/modules/jabber/doc/
<http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/modules/jabber/doc
/>
xjab.sql?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
or from manual
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/jabgw/xjab-manual.html#5._Admins_guide
<http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/jabgw/xjab-manual.html#5._Admins_guide>
It might provide a good help to read next message (especially last part
of it) posted on this list
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2002-December/000049.html
<http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2002-December/000049.html>
After that if you still have problems do not hesitate to post a new
message on the list.
Best regards,
Daniel
Toni Barata (EPS) wrote:
Hi folks,
( I think!) I have successfully installed SER server with the ser-mysql and
ser-jabber packages ( I have also a mysql server and a Jabber server
running).
For testing I have established a SIP IM session between two MS Messengers
and it did work.
After this I have tried to establish a IM session between a user SIP (MS
Messenger) and a user Jabber (Exodus), but when the messenger sends a
message for the jabber gateway the following error occurs:
"ERROR: Your message was not sent. You do not have permision to use the
gateway."
What could be the problem here?
Best regards,
Toni
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
<http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org <mailto:serusers@lists.iptel.org>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
<http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers>
Hi Daniel,
I have done this (creating the database sip_jab) before sending my first
email.
Regarding the association of SIP users with Jabber IDs, I have added an
entry on table jusers this way on mysql:
mysql> INSERT INTO jusers VALUES
('1','user1','user1','user1(a)mydomain.com','0');
Should it be done this way or there are others ways to do it?
The same problem persists.
Regards,
Toni
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel-Constantin MIERLA [mailto:mierla@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Janeiro de 2003 19:54
To: Toni Barata (EPS)
Cc: 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
Subject: Re: [Serusers] user permission problem on ser-jabber gw
Hello,
you have to create the database for SIMPLE2Jabber gateway and after that
you have to associate SIP users with Jabber IDs.
I wrote a manual for gateway, but is more related to next ser release.
Anyway, the database is the same, exported methods too, only some
parameters has changed. The database can be created using sql script
from CVS
http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/modules/jabber/doc/
xjab.sql?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
or from manual
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/jabgw/xjab-manual.html#5._Admins_guide
It might provide a good help to read next message (especially last part
of it) posted on this list
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2002-December/000049.html
After that if you still have problems do not hesitate to post a new
message on the list.
Best regards,
Daniel
Toni Barata (EPS) wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>( I think!) I have successfully installed SER server with the ser-mysql and
>ser-jabber packages ( I have also a mysql server and a Jabber server
>running).
>For testing I have established a SIP IM session between two MS Messengers
>and it did work.
>After this I have tried to establish a IM session between a user SIP (MS
>Messenger) and a user Jabber (Exodus), but when the messenger sends a
>message for the jabber gateway the following error occurs:
>
>"ERROR: Your message was not sent. You do not have permision to use the
>gateway."
>
>What could be the problem here?
>
>Best regards,
>Toni
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>
>
Hello,
I am now working with iptel express router source code ver 0.8.10
on a Suse 8.0 machine with gcc version 3.2
How can i send a signal to the server for shutdown and deinstall the
installed server later which ist installed from a
1) tar.gz source with make install
and if different
2) tar.gz source by unzipping the code under directory "/"
Thanks
Hi folks,
( I think!) I have successfully installed SER server with the ser-mysql and
ser-jabber packages ( I have also a mysql server and a Jabber server
running).
For testing I have established a SIP IM session between two MS Messengers
and it did work.
After this I have tried to establish a IM session between a user SIP (MS
Messenger) and a user Jabber (Exodus), but when the messenger sends a
message for the jabber gateway the following error occurs:
"ERROR: Your message was not sent. You do not have permision to use the
gateway."
What could be the problem here?
Best regards,
Toni
I have installed IpTel on a SuSe 8.0 machine and have 2 Windows machines
attached with a hub.
When i try to add a user with: serctl add username ....-
then i have a problem executing mysql.
So is it because of the wrong installation or do i have to install the
mysql packet from the SuSe control center?
Thanks in advance.
I also have found myself moving over to Free- and OpenBSD for most
workstation and server needs, but I keep an install of Mandrake handy
for those few apps that don't port to well over to the BSD platforms.
What I'm really interested in is stund support in OpenBSD that
integrated w/ pf, seeing as how the majority of my firewalls are now
OpenBSD 3.1-3.2 boxes running the new pf code. Ser itself runs great on
FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE, which is what I use as my testing platform, but
this NAT stuff is really killing me when it comes to bringing in
potential callers over the WAN. Any word on when a *BSD-compatible
binary of stund might be available? Thanks.
--
Art Mason CCNA
Network Consultant
Maverick Datacom
E-mail: amason(a)maverickdatacom.com
Folks,
I discovered that the tm module generates non RFC3261 compliant branch
id when forwarding ACK to the final 200 OK response. The RFC, to which
ser claims to complain by prefixing generated branch id with magic
"z9hG4bK", mandates that ACK to the final 200 OK response should carry
on the same branch id as that response and the initial INVITE. On contrary,
ser currently adds RFC3261-compliant branch ids for everything, but
that final ACK, which in default configuration is being sent with branch
id of `0'. This creates a compatibility problem when the next hop uses
that branch id for matching 200 OKs to subsequent ACKs, example of such
UA is Vovida's b2bua software.
I do not have a fix right now, as I am away from my lab, but it should
be pretty trivial to fix by pre-loading msg->add_to_branch_s with a
correct value in tm module before calling forward() and non-overriding it
in the forward() if it is already non-NULL.
-Maxim
Hello,
Above all my questions before, i would like to make everything clear from
the beginning.
I was trying to IPTEL express router under the directory which came after
unzipping ser-0.8.10_src.tar.gz with the command "tar -xzvf"
on my SuSe-Linux 8.0 machine with kernel 2.4.18-4GB .
I got some errors during compilation. Is this version 0.8.10 compatible
with
SuSe 8.0? When not with which SuSe Linux distributions is it working
properly?
Could you send me compilation and installation procedures or refer to the
related files if possible?
Waiting for your reply,
Best regards,
Hi *,
we have a 3PCC-scenario and we want to modify an existing session.
(Change IP and Port an UA is listening to)
In RFC 3261 section 14 is described how to modify existing sessions
throught an re-Invite but SER sends me an OK without sending the 2nd
Invite to the UAC.
Can you imagine what I have done wrong?
(My scenario acts like Flow II in draft-ietf-sipping-3pcc-02.txt,
becourse my UAC is buggy and gives me to to an Invite without SDP a 500)
(The Screenshots of my test are attached)
Thank you!
Karsten
Daniel,
Not sure if it has been asked before.
Is presence support from SIP to Jabber and viceversa completely working in cvs
version?
Regards,
Jaime
*******************************************************************************
Important.
Confidentiality: This communication is intended for the above-named person and
may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any opinions expressed in this
communication are not necessarily those of the company. If it has come to you
in error you must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to
anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the sender immediately.
Monitoring/Viruses
Orange may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current
legislation. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
Orange PCS Limited is a subsidiary of Orange SA and is registered in England No
2178917, with its address at St James Court, Great Park Road, Almondsbury Park,
Bradley Stoke, Bristol BS32 4QJ.
*******************************************************************************
Hi,
When using the Jabber Gateway, some users get the following error from time to
time:
ERROR: Connection to Jabber server lost. You have to login to Jabber server
again (join again the conferences that you were participating, too).
sip_to_jabber_gateway says:
INFO: Your are now offline in Jabber network. Thank you for using SIP-Jabber
gateway.
Do you know the reason why these messages appear and if it is possible to
avoid them?
Thanks,
Jaime
*******************************************************************************
Important.
Confidentiality: This communication is intended for the above-named person and
may be confidential and/or legally privileged. Any opinions expressed in this
communication are not necessarily those of the company. If it has come to you
in error you must take no action based on it, nor must you copy or show it to
anyone; please delete/destroy and inform the sender immediately.
Monitoring/Viruses
Orange may monitor all incoming and outgoing emails in line with current
legislation. Although we have taken steps to ensure that this email and
attachments are free from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good
computing practice the recipient should ensure they are actually virus free.
Orange PCS Limited is a subsidiary of Orange SA and is registered in England No
2178917, with its address at St James Court, Great Park Road, Almondsbury Park,
Bradley Stoke, Bristol BS32 4QJ.
*******************************************************************************