- sr-users - kamailio.org

Change in mailing list configuration related to DMARC spam filtering

by Henning Westerholt

Hello, due to some changes from certain cloud infrastructure provider related to spam filtering with DMARC, we need to change the list manager "mailman" configuration for the following lists: * sr-users * sr-user-es * sr-dev * business * sr-docs * kamailio-announce * the administrative mailing list The change will impact the "From" that is displayed in your email program. Without that change large e-mail providers (Gmail, Microsoft O365) will reject messages from a sender with certain strict DMARC policy. This is already affecting several people on the lists (for example with GitHub notice mails), but over time the problem will certainly increase. Regarding the technical change: We will munge the From: header so it doesn't contain the domain that triggers the DMARC rejection. Essentially, the Mailman list takes ownership of the message and injects its own address into the From: header. This can affect reply-to-sender, although we add the original From: address in the Reply-To: header (or sometimes the Cc: header) to reduce the impact of this. We plan to do this for all emails unconditionally, regardless of their sender DMARC policy, to have an identical behaviour for all users. Please refer to this [1] page for more details. For a general description of DMARC refer to this page [2]. This change should have not a big impact for you, but some users might need to adapt some mail filters. Therefore, we would like to gather feedback on that change from you. We expect that the most visible change is that It will be not possible anymore to just reply by e-mail to mails from GitHub and have them "automatically" added to the discussed issue. This feature was so far used rarely and only from a few people. We plan to implement this change by the end of this week, when its done it will be also shortly announced. Best regards, Henning Westerholt [1] https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC [2] https://dmarc.org/overview/ -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>

9 months, 2 weeks

1
1
0 0

RTP traffic through kamailio

by Shravan

9 months, 2 weeks

2
1
1 0

insert_dlg_timer(): Trying to insert a bogus dlg

by Benoît Panizzon

Hi Team Could anyone point me in the direction where I could find out more what's going wrong and what could be the cause of messages like: Sep 22 07:32:29 dev-core02 kamailio[915066]: CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_timer.c:129]: insert_dlg_timer(): Trying to insert a bogus dlg tl=0x7f9617d967b0 tl->next=0x7f9618e11198 tl->prev=0x7f9617e20548 Sep 22 07:32:29 dev-core02 kamailio[915066]: CRITICAL: dialog [dlg_dmq.c:314]: dlg_dmq_handle_msg(): Unable to insert dlg timer 0x7f9617d96750 [1598:12168] Are the numbers in brackets [hash_id:hash_entry] ? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Dialog: bogus event 2 in state 3

by Benoît Panizzon

Hi Team I'm still hunting dialog errors which cause my dialog counters to divert and stick around, basically exploding in my face now and then. I suppose they are DMQ related (maybe packet loss, maybe retransmissions, maybe generic overloading of the virtualized kamailio instances) causing issues with inserting dialog timers on the peer etc. So for the moment I'm running only one instance, no DMQ peer. What I still occasionally see are messages: INVITE]dialog [dlg_hash.c:1182]: next_state_dlg(): bogus event 2 in state 3 for dlg 0x7ff906294be8 [2482:872] with clid 'A8459C74@7f33ff47' and tags '7f33ff47+1+7d820120+89494caf' '3904288054-1882699775' I found an ancient post, confirming this to be an open bug in Kamailio 1.4 and race condition between the 200 OK reply to an INVITE and the ACK confirming the 200 OK. Someone attempted to backport a fix for opensips to kamailio. Indeed, I see this message occur occasionally after managing the 200 OK reply and routing the ACK. Does anyone know, if this is still a open bug with Kamailio 5.5? Or what else could be the cause of this message? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Floating Point in variables and arithmetic

by Barry Flanagan

Hi I need to take in a priority (from 0 to 100, 0 being highest prio) and convert this into a Q value between 0 and 1.0 My idea was to simply do: q_value = 1 - ($var(priority)/100) However, it seems Kamailio only deals in integers in the config. A Previous post suggested using xavp vars, but this ends up the same result. Apart from doing a pseudo SQL query "SELECT 1 - (20/100)" is there any way within the config I can do such maths? Thanks -- -Barry Flanagan

9 months, 2 weeks

2
8
0 0

uac_auth() in KEMI Python - Drop 401 sent to caller

by Marrold

Hi all, I'm attempting to use the uac module in KEMI (Python) to authenticate outbound requests. When the downstream replies with a 401 the proxy correctly re-sends the request with a Authorization header, but the 401 is also relayed to the caller. As far as I can tell I've converted the example to KEMI correctly, but no matter what I try the 401 is still sent to the caller. Any ideas? The config I'm using is below - The avps are set when the request is sent so aren't visible here. Thanks def ksr_failure_manage(self, msg): if self.ksr_route_natmanage(msg)==-255 : return 1 if KSR.tm.t_is_canceled()>0 : return 1 if KSR.tm.t_check_status("401|407") >0 : KSR.info(f"Got a 40X, should attempt authentication") if KSR.uac.uac_auth()>0: KSR.tm.t_relay() KSR.info (f"Dropping further replies") KSR.set_drop() exit() return 1

9 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Handle the DNS SRV to manage failover

by Massimo Dal Sasso

I need to manage failover in the connection between SCSCF and AS. I need to understand how it is possible to configure Kamailio to handle the DNS SRV to manage failover for UAS transaction like REGISTER. I see that it works for UAC transaction like INVITE, but I am not able to configure Kamailio to work for UAS transaction. Thanks, Massimo ________________________________ Massimo Dal Sasso SW Developer massimo.dalsasso(a)ext.athonet.com [Athonet logo]<https://www.athonet.com/> the mobile core that works for you Athonet Italy Via Cà del Luogo 6/8 36050 Bolzano Vicentino Vicenza-Italy +39 0444 750045 This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the named addressee, please be aware that you shall not distribute, copy, use or disclose this email. If you have received this email by error, please notify us immediately and delete this email from your system. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secured or error-free or not to contain viruses. Athonet S.r.l. processes any personal data exchanged in email correspondence in accordance with EU Reg. 679/2016 (GDPR) - you may find here the privacy policy with information on such processing and your rights. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily represent those of Athonet S.r.l.

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Creating CDRs for Missed and failed calls

by Marrold

Hi all, I'm using the acc module along with postgres to generate CDRs. For connected calls the CDRs are created as expected, but in the scenario where a lookup() fails and Kamailio sends a stateless 404 there's no CDR logged. I'm setting the FLT_ACCMISSED and FLT_ACCFAILED flags in the initial request route, but perhaps I have a misunderstanding of how these work? Thanks Matthew

9 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

How to validate re-invites without challenging them?

by Benoit Panizzon

Hi List At the moment, we challenge every invite (and re-invite) to make sure the customer is authenticated. Now we have one kind of PBX, which never does not authenticate when we challenge a Re-Invite. According to the vendor of that PBX's RFC interpretation, answering a challenge to a re-invite is optional. If that is ignored by the PBX, then the existing established dialog shall not end. Unfortunately this causes the session timer to run out. I am therefore wondering, if there is a safe way not to challenge re-invites. A Re-Invite contains a To-Tag. So I could bypass authentication on presence of a to-Tag. But then, how do I prevent a customer to just set a spoofed To-Tag to circumvent authentication? Is there a feasible way? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

9 months, 2 weeks

4
3
0 0

DBTEXT + TOPOS

by James Lipski

Hello, I'm doing an experiment with the DB_TEXT module. I have the topos module enabled; however it doesn't seem to function properly with db_text. Going over my syslog I see the following, and not quite understanding why it's failing to insert the row; I was hoping someone can point me in the right direction. This is a fresh install/ fresh DB. Thank you. Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[5] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[6] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[6] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[7] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[7] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:200]: dbt_load_file(): column[8] is INT! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[9] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[9] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:239]: dbt_load_file(): column[9] NULL flag set! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[10] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[10] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[11] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[11] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:239]: dbt_load_file(): column[11] NULL flag set! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[12] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[12] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:239]: dbt_load_file(): column[12] NULL flag set! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[13] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[13] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:239]: dbt_load_file(): column[13] NULL flag set! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[14] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[14] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[15] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[15] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[16] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[16] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[17] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[17] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[18] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[18] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[19] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[19] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[20] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[20] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[21] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[21] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[22] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[22] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[23] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[23] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[24] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[24] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:195]: dbt_load_file(): column[25] is STR! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_file.c:227]: dbt_load_file(): column[25] is actually STRING! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:119]: db_new_result(): allocate 56 bytes for result set at 0x7fd70c7f4c40 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:156]: db_allocate_columns(): allocate 160 bytes for result names at 0x7fd70cacabf8 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:167]: db_allocate_columns(): allocate 80 bytes for result types at 0x7fd70c7f4ce0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[0] at 0x7fd70cacad00 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[1] at 0x7fd70cacad78 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[2] at 0x7fd70cacadf0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[3] at 0x7fd70cacae68 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[4] at 0x7fd70cacaee0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[5] at 0x7fd70cacaf58 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[6] at 0x7fd70cacafd0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[7] at 0x7fd70cacb048 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[8] at 0x7fd70cacb0c0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[9] at 0x7fd70cacb138 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[10] at 0x7fd70cacb1b0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[11] at 0x7fd70cacb228 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[12] at 0x7fd70cacb2a0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[13] at 0x7fd70cacb318 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[14] at 0x7fd70c7c2368 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[15] at 0x7fd70c7c23e0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[16] at 0x7fd70c7c2458 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[17] at 0x7fd70c7c24d0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[18] at 0x7fd70c7c2548 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_api.c:73]: dbt_get_columns(): allocate 16 bytes for RES_NAMES[19] at 0x7fd70c7c25c0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} topos [tps_storage.c:1244]: tps_db_load_branch(): no stored record for <z9hG4bK22d5.7fedda308f2b91b2c0c83021c6adfaec.0> Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:79]: db_free_columns(): freeing 20 columns Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[0] at 0x7fd70cacad00 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[1] at 0x7fd70cacad78 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[2] at 0x7fd70cacadf0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[3] at 0x7fd70cacae68 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[4] at 0x7fd70cacaee0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[5] at 0x7fd70cacaf58 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[6] at 0x7fd70cacafd0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[7] at 0x7fd70cacb048 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[8] at 0x7fd70cacb0c0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[9] at 0x7fd70cacb138 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[10] at 0x7fd70cacb1b0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[11] at 0x7fd70cacb228 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[12] at 0x7fd70cacb2a0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[13] at 0x7fd70cacb318 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[14] at 0x7fd70c7c2368 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[15] at 0x7fd70c7c23e0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[16] at 0x7fd70c7c2458 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[17] at 0x7fd70c7c24d0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[18] at 0x7fd70c7c2548 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:83]: db_free_columns(): freeing RES_NAMES[19] at 0x7fd70c7c25c0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:96]: db_free_columns(): freeing result names at 0x7fd70cacabf8 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:101]: db_free_columns(): freeing result types at 0x7fd70c7f4ce0 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [db_res.c:138]: db_free_result(): freeing result set at 0x7fd70c7f4c40 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} <core> [core/utils/sruid.c:214]: sruid_nextx(): new sruid is [tpsh-6508d6d9-14577b-1] (1 / 22) Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} topos [tps_storage.c:451]: tps_storage_fill_contact(): td->bs <sip:leg_a@host1.sip-example.com;ccr=btpsh-6508d6d9-14577b-1> Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} topos [tps_storage.c:454]: tps_storage_fill_contact(): td->as <sip:leg_b@host1.sip-example.com;ccr=atpsh-6508d6d9-14577b-1> Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} topos [tps_storage.c:552]: tps_storage_link_msg(): downstream: yes - acontact: [sip:133@172.16.1.169:33880;line=g2l0pi9q;alias=72.255.5255.255~33880~1] - bcontact: [] Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: DEBUG: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_lib.c:285]: dbt_db_get_table(): cache or mtime succeeded for [topos_t] Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: ERROR: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_tb.c:468]: dbt_table_check_row(): null value not allowed - field 2 Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: ERROR: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} db_text [dbt_base.c:525]: dbt_insert(): cannot insert the new row!! Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: ERROR: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} topos [tps_storage.c:1004]: tps_db_insert_branch(): failed to store message Sep 18 23:01:59 localhost /opt/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[1333115]: ERROR: {1 2 INVITE e0d608658658-eqkmzxcvr8vd} topos [tps_storage.c:615]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store

9 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Using maxload in dispatcher list

by Calvin E.

Should maxload work with all dispatcher algorithms? I'm trying to add a test node to dispatcher.list with maxload=1 and it is getting a lot more than one concurrent call. The test node is the last one in the list. 16 sip:10.x.x.43:5070 0 0 duid=duid01;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=0 16 sip:10.x.x.44:5070 0 0 duid=duid02;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=0 16 sip:10.x.x.47:5070 0 0 duid=duid03;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=0 16 sip:10.x.x.48:5070 0 0 duid=duid04;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=0 16 sip:10.x.x.56:5070 0 0 duid=duid05;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=0 16 sip:10.x.x.57:5070 0 0 duid=duid06;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=0 16 sip:10.x.x.58:5070 0 0 duid=duid07;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=0 16 sip:10.x.x.x:5070 0 0 duid=duid08;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=0 16 sip:10.x.x.104:5060 0 0 duid=duid09;user=+10007787878;sockname=floating-internal-ip;maxload=1

9 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

SIP Registartion Sharing between two kamailio

by Lewis Hutchinson

On the understanding that you have checked the INVITE to 802 and it looks OK but not getting there then I would probably start digging on the networking side of it. You have said no Firewalls however there may be Security Groups and VPC bits going on in AWS. It's hard to say as the level of detail is not in the ticket. Can 802 call 801? What happens if you log 802 into Kamailio 1 and 801 into Kamailio 2 and call either way. Lewis Mission Labs Limited is registered in England, company number 10040088. Trading Office: The Old Milk Depot, Bacup Rd, Rossendale, BB4 7FE. Registered office: The Scalpel, 18th Floor 52 Lime Street, London, EC3M 7AF. Email confidentiality notice: This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. Please consider the environment before you print this email.

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

SIP Registartion Sharing between two kamailio using AWS NLB having issue.

by pra.savaliya1987＠gmail.com

Hello All, I have two kamailio servers and shared the database between two kamailio. version: kamailio 5.5.6 (x86_64/linux) . I have used AWS network load balancer. domain pointed to AWS network load balancer IP address,AWS Network Load Balancer (NLB) to distribute incoming requests to kamailio servers. I have two users in same domain(dev.domain.com). 1. 801(a)dev.domain.com --> Registered on kamailio 1 2. 802(a)dev.domain.com --> Registered on kamailio 2 Two call invites have been received, one for extension 801 and another for extension 802. These call invites will reach kamailio Server 1. kamailio Lookup the users and send call invite to both the devices. 801 registered user will get a ring because it is registered from kamailio 1. but 802 will not get a ring because it's register from kamailio 2. I can able see kamailio send call invite to the both registered devices using sngrep. but it not reach to the 802 device. there i no firewalls so far. also i have took 802 Registered device IP phone logs but there is no Call Invite reach to the 802 device. I have also tried by using "dmq" and "dmq_usrloc" module but the same behavior. what could be the reason? It will be appreciable if anyone help to resolve the issue. Thank you in advance! Pratik Svaliya.

9 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Increase MAX_BRANCHES_LIMIT

by Lars Jansson

Hi, I am building a configuration script where for some traffic flows parallel forking will be needed, and in this case I need to go beyond the default max limit of the max amount of branches. Apart from this specific case the traffic load that kamailio will need to handle is very low, let's say just one second here and there with up to 5 concurrent calls at most. This limit is as far as I understand set here: usr/local/src/kamailio-5.6/kamailio/src/core/config.h And the default limit is: #define MAX_BRANCHES_LIMIT 32 /*!< limit of maximum number of branches per transaction */ Here are the questions I have related to this: 1) If I increase the value of this constant in config.h, how high is it reasonable to set this value and still have a stable system? 2) If I increase MAX_BRANCHES_LIMIT beyond 32, are there also other parameters that needs to be changed for the system to be able to cope, and if so whichparameters? Regards, Lars

9 months, 2 weeks

4
9
0 0

. Re: Multiple headers in http client request

by Lewis Hutchinson

Hi Matteo I have used http_async_client and http_client in both Native & KEMI to good affect for handling SUBSCRIBE & NOTIFY flows however did have a few issues with formatting which took a bit of work to get right. Just to note, something you may want to test. Initially I set about my task using http client within Python (aiohttp and ayncio) and stepped in and out of it from various points in the logic depending on the config I was using at the time. Under load this proved to be a bottle neck and failed load testing. The best options under load were using http_async_client or http_client modules which offered significantly better performance. In the end we took a different approach of using Kafka Module as that had even better performance but that was a decision taken our side not through any fault of the http_async_client or http_client modules Lewis Mission Labs Limited is registered in England, company number 10040088. Trading Office: The Old Milk Depot, Bacup Rd, Rossendale, BB4 7FE. Registered office: The Scalpel, 18th Floor 52 Lime Street, London, EC3M 7AF. Email confidentiality notice: This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify us and remove it from your system. Please consider the environment before you print this email.

9 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Add Header to reply on failure_route

by Benoit Panizzon

Hi List I'm attempting to add a header to a reply message on failure. Situation: Registrar => Core => (dispatcher list) => Various IC I would like to know on the registrar, which of the dispatcher groups failed. What I attempted sofar: failure_route[DISPATCH_FAILURE] { append_to_reply("X-RR: (append reply) Final Dispatch Failure $avp(dispgroup):$avp(trunkname)\r\n"); append_hf("X-RR: (append hf) Final Dispatch Failure $avp(dispgroup):$avp(trunkname)\r\n"); $avp(rstatus) = t_get_status_code(); $avp(rtext) = $T_rpl($rr); $avp(rtext) = "REMOTE REPLY: " + $T_rpl($rr); t_send_reply("$avp(rstatus)", "$avp(rtext)"); } I only get status text is getting through to my reply. I would much prefer to add a header which I could then extract on the registrar. Am I missing something which could prevent addition of a header in a reply? Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

9 months, 2 weeks

1
1
0 0

Multiple headers in http client request

by Matteo Brancaleoni

Hello all :) I'm struggling to add two headers to an http client request, but cannot find a proper way to do it. The headers are Authorization and Content-Type. The first try is with http_client module, beside undocumented, is possible to add multiple headers separating them with "\r\n". What I see is the correct Authorization header, and two Content-Type headers, one with my content type the other with x-www-form-urlencoded, which no one sets ? Second try is with http_async_client which supports multiple headers, but since I'm calling it from an xhttp event route, there's no transaction and request cannot be suspended, so I cannot get results before sending out xhttp response... Any hint? br, Mat

9 months, 3 weeks

2
3
0 0

Orphan Dialog Vars: Probable cause found!

by Benoît Panizzon

Hi List I wonder if some of the devs could look at the dialog code and maybe confirm my observation of this supposed Bug in Kamailio 5.6 Situation: Two Kamailio, dialog counters synced via DMQ and each node using a local DB as dialog backend. Goal is to count channel usage per customer. modparam("dialog", "db_mode", 1 ) modparam("dialog", "enable_dmq", 1) modparam("dialog", "h_id_start", -1) # Use server_id modparam("dialog", "h_id_step", 2) modparam("dialog", "profiles_with_value", "custcallcounter") If 'JohnDoe' is involved in a call, I do: set_dlg_profile("custcallcounter","JohnDoe"); To check how many calls are busy by JohnDoe I do: get_profile_size("custcallcounter","JohnDoe","$var(channel_use)"); Picture this situation: JohnDoe is initiating a first call via Node1: Node1 created the dialogue and variables, writes them to the database and replicates the dialog vars to Node2 => IN MEMORY Nothing about the running dialog is being written to the Database on Node2, but get_profile_size returns the count on Node2. So while the first call aka dialog is running via Node1, JohnDoe is initiating a second call, this time via Node2. Node2 creates the dialog and writes this to the database. Then the profile with Name 'JohnDoe' is INCREASED on Node2. This is when I suddenly find the dialog_vars on the Node2 database containing information about the dialog started on Node1. So I guess writing to a dialog counter triggers the dialog_vars being written to the Database. When JohnDoe is ending it's first call, then the dialog and dialog_vars are cleaned out of the database on Node1, but NOT on Node2 What I fear happens next: They dialog_vars remaining on the Database of Node 2 accumulate more and more, making the database slower. When a call happens to re use the same hash id and entry, things start going really badly. Could I be right? -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Set a License for Kamailio

by Ali Taher

Hello, Is it possible to put a kind of license for Kamailio, in a way that it works for 1 week for example, and after that it will not process new requests? Regards,

9 months, 3 weeks

3
4
0 0

client sending message and refresh register normal. But KSR.uac.uac_req_send() ERROR

by riffs＠sina.cn

The client uses the TLS protocol registered and TCP Connection established . There is a problem now, sending message KSR.uac.uac_req_send() from the kamilio server to client failed sometimes,and the error is as follows： “2023-09-04T17:22:01.515763+08:00 (3429) ERROR: tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): tcp_send failed 2023-09-04T17:22:01.515763+08:00 (3429) ERROR: tm [uac.c:678]: send_prepared_request_impl(): Attempt to send to precreated request failed ”. meantime, the client sending message to Kamalio server succeded, and the register status and tcp connection is normal. After 30s, obtained the $uac_req(evcode) from the event_route[uac:reply] is 408.After this error appears, all the messages sent to this client are 408. " 2023-08-29T03:48:43.738152+08:00 (3349) NOTICE: <script>: ===uac reply received, callid = 0B6ECB534AE24281AED9BBBC56B140A6`yangwang2`1693252093, code is: 408 2023-08-29T03:48:43.738825+08:00 (3349) NOTICE: <script>: ===uac reply received, callid = 0B6ECB534AE24281AED9BBBC56B140A6`yangwang2`1693252093, code is: 408 " But from other information, the TCP connection is normal. Because from Kamailio to querying this user's Location, it has not changed all day. The client sends messages is also normal. That is, the user's registration and sending messages can receive 200 OK. We use netstat commands to view the user's TCP connection information on the client and server, and the connection status is also normal.The status of the corresponding port of the TCP connection is ESTABLISHED. client: netstat -ano | findstr 49957 "172. 17. 47.125:49957 XXX.96.XXX.XXX:5061 ESTABLISHED 10516" server: "tcp 0 0 10.11.xx.xx:5061 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:49957 ESTABLISHED 3467/kamailio" This client is normal after logging in, and the problem that occurs after a period of use (maybe some hours), and once it occurs, it fails until the user creates a new connection and logs back in. Not all users will appear. Why is this the case? The socket connection is fine, but uac_req_send () get an ERROR? I found a problem from the log file. Is it caused by duplicate callids pushed to the same user at the same second? Looking forward to your answer, thank you very much Script information that may be required kamailio.cfg ： tm mode # ----- tm params ----- # auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3) # default retransmission timeout: 30sec modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30000) # default invite retransmission timeout after 1xx: 120sec modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 120000) modparam("tm", "auto_inv_100", 1) kamalio.lua uac_req_send() " --uac_req_send KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(hdrs)", hdrs) KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(method)", "MESSAGE") KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(ruri)", "sip:" .. to .. "@" .. KAM_DOMAIN) KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(furi)", "sip:" .. from .. "@" .. KAM_DOMAIN) KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(turi)", "sip:" .. to .. "@" .. KAM_DOMAIN) KSR.pv.seti("$uac_req(evroute)", 1) KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(body)", content) local ouri = (row.received ~= "" and row.received) or row.contact KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(ouri)", ouri) local callid = rows[i].clientid .. "`" .. rows[i].username .. "`" .. os.time() KSR.pv.sets("$uac_req(callid)", callid) KSR.uac.uac_req_send()

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

MS Teams and ca_list.pem

by Social Boh

Hello, I'd like to know where i can download/search ca_list.pem file to use in tls.cfg configuration file for MS TEAMS. Without the file: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:50]: tls_err_ret(): TLS write:error:0A000086:SSL routines::certificate verify failed (sni: unknown) ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1336]: tls_h_read_f(): src addr: 52.114.76.76:506 ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1339]: tls_h_read_f(): dst addr: KamailioIP:0 ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1476]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7fb6a23ba4f8 r: 0x7fb6a23ba620 (-1) Thank you Regards -- --- I'm SoCIaL, MayBe

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

number based routing and NATed peers

by Kiss Zoltán

Hello, Im gathering ideas about routing based on caller number to multiple peers and -lets say- subscribers. As far as i know we can route the calls with LCR based on prefix or the whole number to the LCR gateways which are specified in the LCR module gateway table. This is working very well with public IP based "peers". We can route calls to these gateways. But what can we do if we have to route to a "peer" which is behind NAT. Basically they have to REGISTER as a subscriber, but we cannot add a subscriber to the LCR gateway table, beacuse LCR module needs a directly reachable IP address with a fixed port. Does anyone have any ideas on how to handle these mixed type peers? Or maybe we have to add the fixed IP peers which are not REGISTERing to the usrloc database somehow and then we can do a lookup location based on $rU. To make myself clear, it would be nice if we can handle those 2 types of our peers unifromly in terms of SIP routing, thats why im looking for a "unified" solution. Thanks for your suggestions. With kind regards, Zoltan

9 months, 3 weeks

1
0
0 0

Skip/discard branch in branch route?

by Benoît Panizzon

Hi all Is there a way to skip a branch in branch route? Situation: Two registrar server with DMQ synced location database. CPE register via TCP or TLS. To properly work, message have to be sent over the existing TCP connection. Multiple CPE register to one AOR. CPE1 and CPE2 register to Registrar 1 CPE3 registers to Registrar 2 On Registrar 1 there is an established TCP connection to CPE1 and CPE2 but not to CPE3. Within the Branch Route to the CPE I can check if there is a TCP as the Branch Route is executed for every contact in that AOR: branch_route[BR_TO_CPE] { [...] $var(reg_contact_addr) = $(ulc(aor=>addr)[$T_branch_idx]{uri.host}); $var(socket) = $(ulc(aor=>socket)[$T_branch_idx]); if ($var(socket) == 0) { xlog("L_ERROR", "$cfg(route): No Socket for: $var(reg_contact_addr)"); } [...] } This log an error if the socket is not present on the local registrar. But is there a way to tell kamailio to skip/discard that contact? My intention is to parallel branch from the core to both registrars, that way all contacts would still get the call but via established TCP socket (and in case of UDP and NAT via correct know ip for ALG port-forwarding). -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen -Benoît Panizzon- @ HomeOffice und normal erreichbar -- I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden ______________________________________________________ Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch ______________________________________________________

9 months, 3 weeks

2
12
0 0

load_module(): could not find module <mi_fifo> in </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/>

by amit＠cosmicinfotech.com

using kamailio 5.3.9 [244@root ~]$ kamailio -f /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -E loading modules under config path: /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/ 0(1071336) ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:500]: load_module(): could not find module <mi_fifo> in </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/> 0(1071336) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3543]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 294, column 12-23: failed to load module 0(1071336) ERROR: <core> [core/modparam.c:176]: set_mod_param_regex(): No module matching <mi_fifo> found 0(1071336) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3546]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 582, column 63: Can't set module parameter ERROR: bad config file (2 errors) 0(1071336) INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:53]: sctp_core_destroy(): SCTP API not initialized please help!

9 months, 4 weeks

2
2
0 0

Re: uac_replace_to() without RR params

by Duarte Rocha

10 months

2
1
0 0

Question about a Slow timer process.

by Володимир Іванець

Hello everyone! I'm running Kamailio 5.6.2 and having a potential problem on one of the systems. The Slow timer process slowly consumes more and more of its PKG memory. I did not allow it to use all memory by restartink Kamailio during afterhours so I'm not sure what the consequences might be. I'm suspecting that this could be caused by my configuration but not sure how exactly. Can anyone please tell me how the Slow timer process can be debugged? Is it possible to see what it is storing in the memory and what data is piling up? Thanks a lot! Regarts, Volodymyr Ivanets.

10 months

1
0
0 0

uac_replace_to() without RR params

by Duarte Rocha

Hello all, I'm currently working on a proxy where I need to change To and From headers in order to normalize the numbers to +E164. I would like to be able to restore using and $avp() or $dlg_var() and without writing parameters on the Record-Route headers. I've tried to use restore_mode in auto mode and restore_dlg parameter with value 1 but still got the parameters on the inserted Record-Route. I've tried manual mode and using the configured $avp() to restore, but the parameters still got written on the Request-URI. I thought of using restore_mode with value "none" saving original values in an $avvp() and doing the replace, however, uac_replace() on Request Route or branch routes. That way i can't replace the values of To and From in the replies. That being said, my questions are : - Is there a way to use manual or auto mode without writing info on the Record-Route and only using $avp() ? - Is there a way to make changes on the To and From header on replies? Thanks in advance, Best Regards, Duarte Rocha

10 months

1
0
0 0

[Proposal] To add tlsa module to the package builder

by Denys Pozniak

Hello! Are there any technical difficulties in adding tlsa module with the statically linked OpenSSL v1.1.1 to the package builder (deb)? -- BR, Denys Pozniak

10 months

1
0
0 0

Unnecessary/Invalid AVPs in CCR message over Ro Interface

by s.ghahremannejad＠gmail.com

**Issue Description** I'm encountering an issue with my Kamailio configuration related to the inclusion of the "Accounting-Record-Type" (480) and "Accounting-Record-Number" (485) AVPs in Credit-Control Request (CCR) messages sent from the S-CSCF to the OCS. **Issue Details** - **Problem**: The "Accounting-Record-Type" and "Accounting-Record-Number" AVPs are being added to CCR messages generated by my Kamailio instance. - **Expected Behavior**: According to modern Diameter and 3GPP standards (e.g., RFC 4006 and TS 32.299), these AVPs should not be included in CCR messages. **Configuration Details** - **Kamailio Version**: 5.3.0 - **SigScale OCS Version**: 3.2.9 Note that I have redacted some specific information for confidentiality reasons. The actual values are placed in my Kamailio main configuration file (`kamailio.cfg`) and Diameter-specific configuration files (where applicable). Kamailio.cfg: modparam("ims_charging", "db_url", DB_URL) modparam("ims_charging", "db_mode", 1) modparam("ims_charging", "origin_host", HOSTNAME); modparam("ims_charging", "origin_realm", NETWORKNAME); modparam("ims_charging", "destination_host", DESTINATION_HOST); modparam("ims_charging", "destination_realm", DESTINATION_REALM); modparam("ims_charging","service_context_id_root", RO_ROOT); modparam("ims_charging","service_context_id_ext", RO_EXT); modparam("ims_charging","service_context_id_mnc", MNC); modparam("ims_charging","service_context_id_mcc", MCC); modparam("ims_charging","interim_update_credits",30); modparam("ims_charging","timer_buffer",5); SCSCF.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <DiameterPeer FQDN="scscf.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org" Realm="ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org" Vendor_Id="10415" Product_Name="CDiameterPeer" AcceptUnknownPeers="1" DropUnknownOnDisconnect="1" Tc="30" Workers="16" QueueLength="32" TransactionTimeout="5" SessionsHashSize="128" DefaultAuthSessionTimeout="3600" MaxAuthSessionTimeout="3600" > <Peer FQDN="diameter" Realm="ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org" port="3868"/> <Peer FQDN="192.168.2.31" Realm="ocs.ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org" port="3868"/> <Acceptor port="3868" bind="eth0"/> <Auth id="16777216" vendor="10415"/> <Auth id="16777216" vendor="4491"/> <Auth id="16777216" vendor="13019"/> <Auth id="16777216" vendor="0"/> <Auth id="4" vendor="10415"/>  <Acct id="4" vendor="10415" />  <SupportedVendor vendor="10415" /> <Realm name="ocs.ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org"> <Route FQDN="192.168.2.31" metric="10"/> </Realm> <DefaultRoute FQDN="diameter" metric="10"/> </DiameterPeer> I am using SigScale OCS as my Online Charging System. Here is the error log I received from SigScale OCS: ERROR REPORT==== 5-Sep-2023::07:27:01.393554 === "DIAMETER AVP unsupported" service_name: {ocs_diameter_acct_service,{0,0,0,0},3868} capabilities: {diameter_caps, {<<"host1">>, <<"scscf-1.ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org">>}, {<<"COMPANYNAME.local">>, <<"ims.mncXXX.mccXXX.3gppnetwork.org">>}, {[{0,0,0,0}],[{172,18,0,7}]}, {50386,10415}, {<<"SigScale OCS">>,<<"CDiameterPeer">>}, {[],[]}, {[10415],[10415]}, {[4,16777238],[16777216]}, {[],[]}, {[],[]}, {[{'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[16777238],[]}], [{'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[16777216],[]}, {'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',4491,[16777216],[]}, {'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',13019,[16777216],[]}, {'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[4],[]}, {'diameter_base_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[],[4]}]}, {[329],[]}, {[],[]}} errors: [{5001, {diameter_avp,480,undefined,true,false, <<0,0,0,2>>, 'Accounting-Record-Type',2,'Enumerated',5}}, {5001, {diameter_avp,485,undefined,true,false, <<0,0,0,0>>, 'Accounting-Record-Number',0,'Unsigned32',6}}, {5001, {diameter_avp,260,undefined,true,false, <<0,0,1,10,64,0,0,12,0,0,40,175,0,0,1,2,64,0,0,12,0,0,0,4>>, 'Vendor-Specific-Application-Id', {'3gpp_ro_Vendor-Specific-Application-Id',10415,[4],[]}, 'Grouped',10}}] I would greatly appreciate it if someone from the community could provide insights into the following: 1. Possible Configurations: Are there specific configurations or modules in Kamailio that might cause the inclusion of non-standard AVPs in CCR messages? 2. IMS Ro Interface Behavior: Does anyone have experience with IMS Ro interface behavior using Kamailio that could shed light on this? If you have any guidance, suggestions, or solutions to help me troubleshoot and resolve this problem, please share them. Thank you for your assistance.

10 months

2
1
1 0

kamcmd reload is slow or blocking additional reloads

by Martin Nyström

Hello, Running ”kamcmd permissions.trustedReload” it instantly returns “Reload OK” but I cannot repeat the reload for about 8 seconds. This is the same for dialplan.reload and dispatcher.reload. root@superman.local:/# kamcmd permissions.trustedReload Reload OK root@superman.local:/# kamcmd permissions.trustedReload error: 500 - ongoing reload root@superman.local:/# kamcmd permissions.trustedReload error: 500 - ongoing reload There are scenarios where I might need to reload the permission table multiple times within this 8 second window. Is this some kind of intended block or is something at fault? modparam("db_mysql", "ping_interval", 60) modparam("db_mysql", "timeout_interval", 4) modparam("db_mysql", "auto_reconnect", 1) modparam("db_mysql", "opt_ssl_mode", 0) modparam("permissions", "db_url", "mysql://kamailio:xxxxx@aws-rds-database /kamailio") version: kamailio 5.7.1 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 10.2.1 /M

10 months

4
6
0 0

关于acc_cdr的问题，请教一下

by bikq＠163.com

目前进行一通呼叫后，在acc表中可以看到Invite、ack及bye的记录详情并带有时间，acc_cdrs表中只有start_time及end_time,是对应invite和bye的。现在我想在acc_cdrs中增加ack的时间我该如何去做呢？有没有大佬能解答一下？万分感谢！！！

10 months

1
0
0 0

Configuring package memory

by Ivan Ribakov

Is there any specific reason why shared memory can be configured via the config files ("shm_mem_size") AND CLI flags ("-m") but package memory can only be set via CLI flags ("-M")? Did no one ever came across the need to configure the package memory limit so far, or is there another way to achieve it without using the CLI flag? -- Ivan Ribakov Software Engineer www.zaleos.net

10 months

3
2
0 0

Re: Kamailio stops processing UDP on one interface

by Ihor Olkhovskyi

Bastian, According to mine stats all seems ok... # kamctl stats shmem { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [ "shmem:fragments = 330", "shmem:free_size = 1889418024", "shmem:max_used_size = 258962624", "shmem:real_used_size = 258065624", "shmem:total_size = 2147483648", "shmem:used_size = 248809096" ], "id": 212042 } pkg.stats also not showing any signs of exhausting. For me what is working is server can send packets, but not receive em back even. And it's happening only on 1 interface. Le 30/08/2023 à 21:44, Bastian Triller a écrit : > I'm asking, because we kind of observed similar behaviour after > overload. We've did some load testing and at some point SHM was > exhausted and that didn't recover itself. One process was using nearly > 100% CPU. And I guess that at least sl replies still works at that point. > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:28 PM Ihor Olkhovskyi > <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Bastian, > > I'm fine with retransmissions and so, but for me it's really > interesting, that server is not restoring it's state after a while > and only restart helps. And this is happening only with UDP on one > interface, others are working fine over UDP > > Le 30/08/2023 à 17:19, Bastian Triller a écrit : >> Maybe it's not beneficial to have a receive buffer that high. If >> your presence server is stateful, it will send retransmissions if >> packets get dropped. But it will also send retransmissions if >> your proxy does not reply fast enough. So your proxy may be >> damped by retransmissions. Did you check SHM/active transactions >> on your proxy? >> >> Regards, >> Bastian >> >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 3:56 PM Ihor Olkhovskyi >> <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> They are increasing, actually >> >> # ss -l -u -m src X.X.X.X/Y >> State Recv-Q Send-Q Local >> Address:Port Peer Address:Port >> UNCONN 25167616 0 X.X.X.X:sip *:* >> skmem:(r25167616,rb25165824,t0,tb65536,f2304,w0,o0,bl0,d514894) >> >> Le mer. 30 août 2023 à 15:04, Bastian Triller >> <bastian.triller(a)gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Are drops increasing on that socket while it is happening? >> ss -l src <local_interface> -u sport 5060 -m >> >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 3:26 PM Ihor Olkhovskyi >> <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just to add some info >> >> netstat -nlp >> Active Internet connections (only servers) >> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address >> State PID/Program name >> ... >> udp 25167616 0 <local_interface>:5060 >> 0.0.0.0:* 211759/kamailio >> ... >> >> So I see a huge Receive Queue on UDP for Kamailio >> which is not clearing. >> >> Le mar. 29 août 2023 à 14:29, Ihor Olkhovskyi >> <igorolhovskiy(a)gmail.com> a écrit : >> >> Hello, >> >> I've faced a bit strange issue, but a bit of >> preface. I have Kamailio as a proxy (TLS/WS <-> >> UDP) and second Kamailio as a presence server. At >> some point presence server accepts around 5K >> PUBLISH within 1 minute and sending around the >> same amount of NOTIFY to proxy Kamailio. >> >> Proxy is "transforming" protocol to TLS, but at >> sime point I'm starting to get these type of errors >> >> tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): >> tcp_send failed >> tm [t_fwd.c:1588]: t_send_branch(): sending >> request on branch 0 failed >> <script>: [RELAY] Relay to >> <sip:X.X.X.X:51571;transport=tls> failed! >> tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): >> tcp_send failed >> tm [t_fwd.c:1588]: t_send_branch(): sending >> request on branch 0 failed >> >> Some of those messages are 100% valid as client >> can go away or so. Some are not, cause I'm sure >> client is alive and connected. >> >> But the problem comes later. At some moment proxy >> Kamailio just stops accept UDP traffic on this >> interface (where it also accepts all NOTIFY's), >> at the start of the "stopping accepting" Kamailio >> sends OPTIONS via DISPATCHER but not able to >> receive 200 OK. >> >> Over TLS on the same interface all is ok. On >> other (loopback) interface UDP is being processed >> fine, so I don't suspert some limit on open files >> here. >> >> Only restart of Kamailio proxy process helps in >> this case. >> >> I've tuned net.core.rmem_max and >> net.core.rmem_default to 25 Mb, so in theory >> buffer should not be the case. >> >> Is there some internal "interface buffer" in >> Kamailio that is not freed upon failure send or >> maybe I've missed somethig? >> >> Kamailio 5.6.4 >> >> fork=yes >> children=12 >> tcp_children=12 >> >> enable_tls=yes >> >> tcp_accept_no_cl=yes >> tcp_max_connections=63536 >> tls_max_connections=63536 >> tcp_accept_aliases=no >> tcp_async=yes >> tcp_connect_timeout=10 >> tcp_conn_wq_max=63536 >> tcp_crlf_ping=yes >> tcp_delayed_ack=yes >> tcp_fd_cache=yes >> tcp_keepalive=yes >> tcp_keepcnt=3 >> tcp_keepidle=30 >> tcp_keepintvl=10 >> tcp_linger2=30 >> tcp_rd_buf_size=80000 >> tcp_send_timeout=10 >> tcp_wq_blk_size=2100 >> tcp_wq_max=10485760 >> open_files_limit=63536 >> >> Sysctl >> >> # To increase the amount of memory available for >> socket input/output queues >> net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 25165824 25165824 >> net.core.rmem_max = 25165824 >> net.core.rmem_default = 25165824 >> net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 25165824 >> net.core.wmem_max = 25165824 >> net.core.wmem_default = 65536 >> net.core.optmem_max = 25165824 >> >> # To limit the maximum number of requests queued >> to a listen socket >> net.core.somaxconn = 128 >> >> # Tells TCP to instead make decisions that would >> prefer lower latency. >> net.ipv4.tcp_low_latency=1 >> >> # Optional (it will increase performance) >> net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 1000 >> net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 128 >> >> # Flush the routing table to make changes happen >> instantly. >> net.ipv4.route.flush=1 >> -- >> Best regards, >> Ihor (Igor) >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Ihor (Igor) >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial >> Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, >> do not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do >> not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Ihor (Igor) >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not >> reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >> >> >> __________________________________________________________ >> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions >> To unsubscribe send an email tosr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org >> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! >> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: >

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

Install Kamailio 5.3

by Daniel Oliveira Hilário

Hi people, I installed Kamailio 5.3 on Ubuntu Server 22 LTS, but I am not able to resolve several PHP errors that occur when I try to open the website http://localhost/siremis/. Which Linux distro and version is best suited for installation? Is Kamailio version 5.3 operational or is it better to use version 4.4? Att., Daniel Hilário INFRACOM/UFRGS 51 3308 4801

10 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

Kamailio stops processing UDP on one interface

by Ihor Olkhovskyi

Hello, I've faced a bit strange issue, but a bit of preface. I have Kamailio as a proxy (TLS/WS <-> UDP) and second Kamailio as a presence server. At some point presence server accepts around 5K PUBLISH within 1 minute and sending around the same amount of NOTIFY to proxy Kamailio. Proxy is "transforming" protocol to TLS, but at sime point I'm starting to get these type of errors tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): tcp_send failed tm [t_fwd.c:1588]: t_send_branch(): sending request on branch 0 failed <script>: [RELAY] Relay to <sip:X.X.X.X:51571;transport=tls> failed! tm [../../core/forward.h:292]: msg_send_buffer(): tcp_send failed tm [t_fwd.c:1588]: t_send_branch(): sending request on branch 0 failed Some of those messages are 100% valid as client can go away or so. Some are not, cause I'm sure client is alive and connected. But the problem comes later. At some moment proxy Kamailio just stops accept UDP traffic on this interface (where it also accepts all NOTIFY's), at the start of the "stopping accepting" Kamailio sends OPTIONS via DISPATCHER but not able to receive 200 OK. Over TLS on the same interface all is ok. On other (loopback) interface UDP is being processed fine, so I don't suspert some limit on open files here. Only restart of Kamailio proxy process helps in this case. I've tuned net.core.rmem_max and net.core.rmem_default to 25 Mb, so in theory buffer should not be the case. Is there some internal "interface buffer" in Kamailio that is not freed upon failure send or maybe I've missed somethig? Kamailio 5.6.4 fork=yes children=12 tcp_children=12 enable_tls=yes tcp_accept_no_cl=yes tcp_max_connections=63536 tls_max_connections=63536 tcp_accept_aliases=no tcp_async=yes tcp_connect_timeout=10 tcp_conn_wq_max=63536 tcp_crlf_ping=yes tcp_delayed_ack=yes tcp_fd_cache=yes tcp_keepalive=yes tcp_keepcnt=3 tcp_keepidle=30 tcp_keepintvl=10 tcp_linger2=30 tcp_rd_buf_size=80000 tcp_send_timeout=10 tcp_wq_blk_size=2100 tcp_wq_max=10485760 open_files_limit=63536 Sysctl # To increase the amount of memory available for socket input/output queues net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 25165824 25165824 net.core.rmem_max = 25165824 net.core.rmem_default = 25165824 net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 25165824 net.core.wmem_max = 25165824 net.core.wmem_default = 65536 net.core.optmem_max = 25165824 # To limit the maximum number of requests queued to a listen socket net.core.somaxconn = 128 # Tells TCP to instead make decisions that would prefer lower latency. net.ipv4.tcp_low_latency=1 # Optional (it will increase performance) net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 1000 net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 128 # Flush the routing table to make changes happen instantly. net.ipv4.route.flush=1 -- Best regards, Ihor (Igor)

10 months, 1 week

3
5
0 0

[OT] Code 868 reply to SIP OPTIONS ?

by Olivier

Hello, Have you ever seen a SIP device replying with code 868 to a SIP OPTIONS request ? Best regards

10 months, 1 week

1
1
0 0

How to forward 480

by Anthony Blandin

Hello, I have a Kamailio SBC connected to another foreign SBC and to a media server. In case of non response, Kamailio SBC receives a 480 Temporarily not available from the foreign SBC and I need to forward this 480 to my media server but I don't see how to do that. The 480 arrives in the onreply_route. If I use then a failure_route, it resends the initial INVITE and not the 480. Is there a way to do that? Thanks for your help. Anthony Blandin

10 months, 1 week

2
1
0 0

Re: extreme dildoes

by Angel Elena

I think is better sip over tls to extra protection xD Sent from Android device El 26 ago 2023 12:59, Julien Chavanton <jchavanton(a)gmail.com> escribió: Are you trying to connect them over SIP ? On Sat, Aug 26, 2023, 6:06 AM <feigelwang(a)uusextoy.com <mailto:feigelwang@uusextoy.com> > wrote: So, when you still are alone, buying a huge dildo is worth it. Enjoy sex with the huge realistic dildo anytime and anywhere. Not only that, the big dildo brings completely different sexual stimulation. Maybe you want to enjoy full sex, should try some other sex toys. https://www.hugedildo.com/ __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.org> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

extreme dildoes

by feigelwang＠uusextoy.com

So, when you still are alone, buying a huge dildo is worth it. Enjoy sex with the huge realistic dildo anytime and anywhere. Not only that, the big dildo brings completely different sexual stimulation. Maybe you want to enjoy full sex, should try some other sex toys. https://www.hugedildo.com/

10 months, 1 week

6
5
0 0

large dildo

by feigelwang＠uusextoy.com

Or, if you are good at Google search, I believe you can definitely find more ways to play the big dildo. All in all, huge dildos are the best sex toy for singles. For single women, it’s vaginal masturbation. For single men, it’s anal sex. https://www.hugedildo.com/

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

large dildo

by feigelwang＠uusextoy.com

Or, if you are good at Google search, I believe you can definitely find more ways to play the big dildo. All in all, huge dildos are the best sex toy for singles. For single women, it’s vaginal masturbation. For single men, it’s anal sex.https://www.hugedildo.com/

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

extreme dildoes

by feigelwang＠uusextoy.com

So, when you still are alone, buying a huge dildo is worth it. Enjoy sex with the huge realistic dildo anytime and anywhere. Not only that, the big dildo brings completely different sexual stimulation. Maybe you want to enjoy full sex, should try some other sex toys.https://www.hugedildo.com/

10 months, 1 week

1
0
0 0

rtpengine large number used RTP ports

by marek

hi, i have open around ~8000 rtp ports for around ~200calls (in peak) with this statistic (current data, not from peak) rtpengine_closed_sessions_total{reason="rejected"} 0 rtpengine_closed_sessions_total{reason="timeout"} 237405 rtpengine_closed_sessions_total{reason="silent_timeout"} 103 rtpengine_closed_sessions_total{reason="final_timeout"} 0 rtpengine_closed_sessions_total{reason="offer_timeout"} 0 rtpengine_closed_sessions_total{reason="terminated"} 0 rtpengine_request_seconds_total{proxy="127.0.0.1",request="offer"} 539.270967 rtpengine_request_seconds_total{proxy="127.0.0.1",request="answer"} 367.237641 rtpengine_request_seconds_total{proxy="127.0.0.1",request="delete"} 0.000000 is it normal? (large number of timeouts, "zero" terminated) or i have missing rtpengine_manage (rtpengine_delete) somewhere? (os rocky 9.2, kamailio 5.6.4, rtpengine 11.3.1) thanks Marek

10 months, 2 weeks

2
3
0 0

excessive CANCELs

by James Lipski

Hello, I've already suppressed this via routing logic, however I was wondering if there is a dedicated parameter that handles this. I'm currently running version 5.6.4. Scenario: UA-1 registered towards kamailio, calls UA-2 which is registered towards a different platform (non kamailio); so there are 2 proxys involved. kamailio is set to fork the call to voicemail if there is either no response completely from the other end, or the call goes unanswered. So the initial leg is: UA-1 <-----> kamailio <-----> second proxy <-----> UA-2 Issue: I'm trying to catch a case where the second proxy does issue a "100 Trying" for the initial INVITE; and then timesout. The call does fork to voicemail; however 14000+ SIP packets are generated between kamailio and the second proxy of CANCEL and "100 Trying" (the 100 Trying has a CSeq for INVITE still). Is there a way to suppress the amount of CANCELs that is transmitted in this situation? I'm using the following as my "tm" parameters: modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3) modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30000) modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 300000) modparam("tm", "auto_inv_100_reason", "Trying") Thanks. Example SIP trace: (UA-1 --> kamailio) 72.255.255.255 --> 10.64.52.110 INVITE sip:131@sip-example.com SIP/2.0 v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.102:51519;branch=z9hG4bK-xfelmyyjzne5;rport f: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y t: <sip:131@sip-example.com> i: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: snomD785/10.1.152.12 m: <sip:133@10.0.0.102:51519;line=6dv00d6r>;reg-id=1 Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer, call-info Supported: timer, replaces, from-change Session-Expires: 3600 Min-SE: 90 Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="133",realm="sip-example.com",nonce="ZOTEBGTkwtiM22ZE8IJsn/esiW3CZrt0"[,uri="sip:131@sip-example.com](mailto:,uri=)",response="fb44b4fe0f8fb17de13f043cf1248e14",algorithm=MD5 c: application/sdp l: 309 v=0 o=root 481174289 481174289 IN IP4 10.0.0.102 s=call c=IN IP4 10.0.0.102 t=0 0 m=audio 50864 RTP/AVP 9 0 8 18 101 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv -------------------------------------------- (UA-1 <-- kamailio) 72.255.255.255 <-- 10.64.52.110 SIP/2.0 100 Trying v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.102:51519;branch=z9hG4bK-xfelmyyjzne5;rport=51519;received=72.255.255.255 f: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y t: <sip:131@sip-example.com> i: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 INVITE Content-Length: 0 -------------------------------------------- (kamailio --> second proxy) 10.64.52.110 --> 10.64.52.100 INVITE sip:second-proxy-example.com:5066;ua=43a58ecca39c9c8f37515e55b5b37ed7 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.64.52.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bKecf9.6d10880e1353b8a7bbf0383d934a38a5.0 f: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y t: <sip:131@sip-example.com?vm-ext%3D100%26ext-to%3D131%26ext-from%3D133> i: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 INVITE Max-Forwards: 15 Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer, call-info Supported: timer, replaces, from-change Session-Expires: 3600 Min-SE: 90 c: application/sdp l: 313 Contact: <sip:leg_1@sip-example.com;ccr=btpsh-64e387e0-ee528-2> v=0 o=root 481174289 481174289 IN IP4 10.64.52.111 s=call c=IN IP4 10.64.52.111 t=0 0 m=audio 34084 RTP/AVP 9 0 8 18 101 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv -------------------------------------------- (kamailio <-- second proxy) 10.64.52.110 <-- 10.64.52.100 SIP/2.0 100 Trying v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.64.52.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bKecf9.6d10880e1353b8a7bbf0383d934a38a5.0 f: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y t: <sip:131@sip-example.com?vm-ext%3D100%26ext-to%3D131%26ext-from%3D133> i: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 INVITE l: 0 -------------------------------------------- After 10 seconds of no further response from second proxy, call is forked to voicemail (kamailio --> voicemail) 10.64.52.110 --> 10.64.56.10 INVITE sip:voicemail@voicemail-example.com SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.64.52.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bKecf9.6d10880e1353b8a7bbf0383d934a38a5.1 f: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y t: <sip:131@sip-example.com?vm-ext%3D100%26ext-to%3D131%26ext-from%3D133> i: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 INVITE Max-Forwards: 15 Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE Allow-Events: talk, hold, refer, call-info Supported: timer, replaces, from-change Session-Expires: 3600 Min-SE: 90 c: application/sdp l: 313 Contact: <sip:leg_1@sip-example.com;ccr=btpsh-64e387e0-ee533-3> v=0 o=root 481174289 481174289 IN IP4 10.64.52.111 s=call c=IN IP4 10.64.52.111 t=0 0 m=audio 38722 RTP/AVP 9 0 8 18 101 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 a=sendrecv -------------------------------------------- At roughly the same time, CANCEL is issued towards the second proxy (kamailio --> second proxy) 10.64.52.110 --> 10.64.52.100 CANCEL sip:second-proxy-example.com:5066;ua=43a58ecca39c9c8f37515e55b5b37ed7 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.64.52.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bKecf9.6d10880e1353b8a7bbf0383d934a38a5.0 f: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y t: <sip:131@sip-example.com> i: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 CANCEL Max-Forwards: 15 l: 0 -------------------------------------------- (kamailio <-- voicemail) 10.64.52.110 <-- 10.64.56.10 SIP/2.0 200 Ok Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.64.52.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bKecf9.6d10880e1353b8a7bbf0383d934a38a5.1 From: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y To: <sip:131@sip-example.com?vm-ext%3D100%26ext-to%3D131%26ext-from%3D133>;tag=vzx5x3mlbd Call-ID: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 INVITE Contact: <sip:voicemail@10.64.56.10:5078> Require: timer Session-Expires: 3600;refresher=uac Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, MESSAGE, INFO Supported: timer, 100rel, replaces Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 264 v=0 o=root 1084843702 1084843703 IN IP4 10.64.56.10 s=call c=IN IP4 10.64.56.10 t=0 0 m=audio 31908 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 a=alt:1 0.9 : user 9kksj== 10.64.56.10 31908 a=sendrecv -------------------------------------------- (UA-1 <-- kamailio) 72.255.255.255 <-- 10.64.52.110 SIP/2.0 200 Ok From: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y To: <sip:131@sip-example.com?vm-ext%3D100%26ext-to%3D131%26ext-from%3D133>;tag=vzx5x3mlbd Call-ID: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 INVITE Require: timer Session-Expires: 3600;refresher=uac Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, REFER, OPTIONS, NOTIFY, SUBSCRIBE, PRACK, MESSAGE, INFO Supported: timer, 100rel, replaces Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 270 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.102:51519;received=72.255.255.255;branch=z9hG4bK-xfelmyyjzne5;rport=51519 Contact: <sip:leg_2@sip-example.com;ccr=atpsh-64e387e0-ee533-3> v=0 o=root 1084843702 1084843703 IN IP4 10.64.52.110 s=call c=IN IP4 10.64.52.110 t=0 0 m=audio 33552 RTP/AVP 0 101 a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=ptime:20 a=alt:1 0.9 : user 9kksj== 10.64.56.10 31908 a=sendrecv =============================================== These next 2 SIP packets repeat, generating 14000+ CANCEL <--> 100 Trying transactions between kamailio, and the second proxy. (kamailio --> second proxy) 10.64.52.110 --> 10.64.52.100 CANCEL sip:second-proxy-example.com:5066;ua=43a58ecca39c9c8f37515e55b5b37ed7 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.64.52.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bKecf9.6d10880e1353b8a7bbf0383d934a38a5.0 f: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y t: <sip:131@sip-example.com> i: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 CANCEL Max-Forwards: 15 l: 0 -------------------------------------------- (kamailio <-- second proxy) 10.64.52.110 <-- 10.64.52.100 SIP/2.0 100 Trying v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.64.52.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bKecf9.6d10880e1353b8a7bbf0383d934a38a5.0 f: <sip:133@sip-example.com>;tag=i4mlq4jr0y t: <sip:131@sip-example.com?vm-ext%3D100%26ext-to%3D131%26ext-from%3D133> i: 95c3e4642670-rx28v46dte4p CSeq: 1 INVITE l: 0

10 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

Force communications for I-CSCF and S-CSCF to be TCP only

by hvanhelmondt＠peratonlabs.com

Hi, I would like to force the transport protocol between the I-CSCF and S-CSCF to be TCP only. How would I do that exactly? I'm using an older Kamailio release 5.0.8. Regards,

10 months, 2 weeks

2
2
0 0

use_dns_failover default value

by Silvan Nagl

Hi, I would like to know the reason for having "off" as default value for use_dns_failover. https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3547 Greetings, Silvan

10 months, 2 weeks

5
4
2 0

Kamailio 5.5.4 pua module memory leak

by Vladyslav Korniiaka

Hello! We are facing a Kamailio memory leak with the pua module, pua module consumes about 2GBs: kamcmd mod.stats all shm Module: pua { add_pua_event(72): 648 init_pua_evlist(36): 56 new_htable(79): 8192 init_puacb_list(35): 16 new_htable(64): 8 publ_cback_func(409): 12451504 publ_cback_func(363): 1658482848 update_htable(203): 210590960 new_htable(93): 131512 Total: 1881665744 } Module: pua_dialoginfo { get_str_list(463): 344 get_dialog_data(500): 1744 Total: 2088 } PUA Module parameters: loadmodule "pua.so" loadmodule "pua_dialoginfo" # ----- pua params ----- modparam("pua", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("pua", "db_mode", 0) modparam("pua", "outbound_proxy", PUA_PROXY) modparam("pua", "db_table_lock_write", 0) modparam("pua", "update_period", 0) modparam("pua", "dlginfo_increase_version", 0) modparam("pua", "reginfo_increase_version", 0) modparam("pua", "check_remote_contact", 0) modparam("pua", "fetch_rows", 1000) modparam("pua", "default_expires", 30) # ----- pua_dialoginfo params ----- modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "include_callid", 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "send_publish_flag", FLT_PUBLISH) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "caller_confirmed", 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "include_tags", 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "include_localremote", 0) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "use_pubruri_avps", 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "pubruri_caller_avp", "$avp(s:puburis_caller)") modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "pubruri_callee_avp", "$avp(s:puburis_callee)") *- Kamailio 5.5.4 (x86_64/linux), installed from .deb packages:* kamailio --version version: kamailio 5.5.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 8.3.0 *- Kamailio is runned in Docker:* docker --version Docker version 20.10.21, build baeda1f *- With “Debian GNU/Linux 10” docker image:* cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux 10 \n \l *- Host OS is “Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS”:* cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS \n \l *- Server is AWS EC2 with CPU:* lscpu: Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian Address sizes: 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual CPU(s): 8 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model: 85 Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8275CL CPU @ 3.00GHz Stepping: 7 CPU MHz: 3599.769 BogoMIPS: 5999.98 Hypervisor vendor: KVM Virtualization type: full L1d cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache: 1024K L3 cache: 36608K NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7 Please tell me if you need any additional information about this issue. Thanks for helping me with this! -- Regards, Vladyslav Korniiaka vladyslav.korniiaka(a)net2phone.com

10 months, 2 weeks

2
1
0 0

Kamailio 5.5.4 pua module memory leak

by vladyslav.korniiaka＠idt.net

Hello! We are facing a Kamailio memory leak with the pua module, pua module consumes about 2GBs: kamcmd mod.stats all shm Module: pua { add_pua_event(72): 648 init_pua_evlist(36): 56 new_htable(79): 8192 init_puacb_list(35): 16 new_htable(64): 8 publ_cback_func(409): 12451504 publ_cback_func(363): 1658482848 update_htable(203): 210590960 new_htable(93): 131512 Total: 1881665744 } Module: pua_dialoginfo { get_str_list(463): 344 get_dialog_data(500): 1744 Total: 2088 } PUA Module parameters: loadmodule "pua.so" loadmodule "pua_dialoginfo" # ----- pua params ----- modparam("pua", "db_url", DBURL) modparam("pua", "db_mode", 0) modparam("pua", "outbound_proxy", PUA_PROXY) modparam("pua", "db_table_lock_write", 0) modparam("pua", "update_period", 0) modparam("pua", "dlginfo_increase_version", 0) modparam("pua", "reginfo_increase_version", 0) modparam("pua", "check_remote_contact", 0) modparam("pua", "fetch_rows", 1000) modparam("pua", "default_expires", 30) # ----- pua_dialoginfo params ----- modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "include_callid", 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "send_publish_flag", FLT_PUBLISH) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "caller_confirmed", 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "include_tags", 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "include_localremote", 0) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "use_pubruri_avps", 1) modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "pubruri_caller_avp", "$avp(s:puburis_caller)") modparam("pua_dialoginfo", "pubruri_callee_avp", "$avp(s:puburis_callee)") - Kamailio 5.5.4 (x86_64/linux), installed from .deb packages: - Kamailio 5.5.4 (x86_64/linux), installed from .deb packages: kamailio --version version: kamailio 5.5.4 (x86_64/linux) flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled with gcc 8.3.0 - Kamailio is runned in Docker: docker --version Docker version 20.10.21, build baeda1f - With “Debian GNU/Linux 10” docker image: cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux 10 \n \l - Host OS is “Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS”: cat /etc/issue Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS \n \l - Server is AWS EC2 with CPU: lscpu: Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian Address sizes: 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual CPU(s): 8 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-7 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per socket: 4 Socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model: 85 Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8275CL CPU @ 3.00GHz Stepping: 7 CPU MHz: 3599.769 BogoMIPS: 5999.98 Hypervisor vendor: KVM Virtualization type: full L1d cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache: 1024K L3 cache: 36608K NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7 Please tell me if you need any additional information about this issue. Thanks for helping me with this! -- Regards, Vladyslav Korniiaka vladyslav.korniiaka(a)net2phone.com

10 months, 2 weeks

1
0
0 0

Check refer-to number

by David Cunningham

Hello, We want to check if the number in a REFER's Refer-To header begins with 011, and if so reject the request as not allowed. What would be the most effective way to do that? Thanks in advance, -- David Cunningham, Voisonics Limited http://voisonics.com/ USA: +1 213 221 1092 New Zealand: +64 (0)28 2558 3782

10 months, 3 weeks

4
4
0 0

Unable to get avp value in response

by peter＠alienzombie.co.uk

I am trying to set a value to an avp on the request route, but when I try to read the avp on the reply route I always get nil. On the route I have this: KSR.xlog.xinfo("invite_request: ********** Setting avp test\n") KSR.pv.seti("$avp(test)", 1) KSR.xlog.xinfo("invite_request: **** " .. tostring(KSR.pv.get("$avp(test)")).."\n") On the reply route I have this: KSR.xlog.xinfo("response_invite: **** " .. tostring(KSR.pv.get("$avp(test)")).."\n") In the logs I see on the INVITE: Aug 8 13:49:15 test /usr/sbin/kamailio[1927947]: INFO: [a0748d39-3f17-4080-b5ed-0a6b7019cb95 INVITE 1]invite_request: ********** Setting avp test Aug 8 13:49:15 test /usr/sbin/kamailio[1927947]: INFO: [a0748d39-3f17-4080-b5ed-0a6b7019cb95 INVITE 1]invite_request: **** 1 ... ... Aug 8 13:49:15 test /usr/sbin/kamailio[1927968]: INFO: [a0748d39-3f17-4080-b5ed-0a6b7019cb95 INVITE 2]response_invite: **** nil Do avp not cover the transaction?

10 months, 3 weeks

2
2
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users