- sr-users - kamailio.org

Kamailio v5.1.4 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 Jun '18

05 Jun '18

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v5.1.4 stable release is out. This is a maintenance release of the latest stable branch, 5.1, that includes fixes since the release of v5.1.3. There is no change to database schema or configuration language structure that you have to do on previous installations of v5.1.x. Deployments running previous v5.1.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v5.1.4. For more details about version 5.1.4 (including links and guidelines to download the tarball or from GIT repository), visit: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2018/06/kamailio-v5-1-4-released/ RPM, Debian/Ubuntu packages will be available soon as well. Many thanks to all contributing and using Kamailio! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

WARNING: topos [tps_storage.c:400]: tps_storage_record(): no local address
by Minh Phan 05 Jun '18

05 Jun '18

Hi List, I have this warning message in kamailio log when Kamailio handle an OPTIONS message with topos module enabled (I am using Kamailio 5.1.2): WARNING: topos [tps_storage.c:400]: tps_storage_record(): no local address - do record routing for all initial requests In my config file, OPTIONS message is handled this way: if ( is_method("OPTIONS") ) { t_newtran(); record_route(); t_reply("200","OK"); exit; } I have found this issue on Github but it is closed and I am not sure what was the solution: #1483 <https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1483> My server receives 4 OPTIONS messages every 10 seconds that give as many warning in my log file. What could I do to get rid of them? Thanks, Minh

3 5

Releasing Kamailio v5.1.4
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 Jun '18

05 Jun '18

Hello, I am considering to release a new minor version out of branch 5.1, respectively the v5.1.4, sometime next week, likely on Tuesday, June 5, 2018. As usual, if there is any issue not yet reported on github tracker, do it as soon as possible to give it a chance to be fixed. Soon I am going to do the backports of commits with fixes in master that apply in branch 5.1, so keep a close eye and if someone is missing, let me know to push it in the stable branch. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com

3 3

Transaction flags and branch_routes
by Alex Balashov 05 Jun '18

05 Jun '18

Hi, Given: flags PROXY_MEDIA_SET : 10, SIPPING : 11, DUMMY2 : 12 And: request_route { ... route(XYZ); } route[XYZ] { setflag(PROXY_MEDIA_SET); t_on_branch("BRANCH_ROUTE"); if(!t_relay()) sl_reply_error(); } branch_route[BRANCH_ROUTE] { if(isflagset(PROXY_MEDIA_SET)) { ... } ... } Is PROXY_MEDIA_SET meant to be visible inside the branch_route? Because it doesn't seem to be. Thanks! -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

2 1

ACK to 200 OK without to tag
by Kjeld Flarup 04 Jun '18

04 Jun '18

We have a SIP doorstation Grandstream GDS3710. When I connect it via kamailio, it does not setup call correct. Kamailio sends a 200 OK with this to field: t: <sip:0001@192.168.1.150:5069>;tag=e33a13d3-c18c-4df1-b68f-446e42957de6 Grandstream answers with: To: <sip:0001@192.168.1.150:5069> As the code follows this example: https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.…, it seems obvious that this will fail, as there is not route[WITHINDLG] { if (has_totag()) { There simply is not to tag. Is this a bug in the grandstream? If so how could that go unnoticed, or is it me who misses something? I have attached the full sip text for the 200OK and the ACK -- -------------------- Med Liberalistiske Hilsner ---------------------- Civilingeniør, Kjeld Flarup - Mit sind er mere åbent end min tegnebog Sofienlundvej 6B, 7560 Hjerm, Tlf: 40 29 41 49 Den ikke akademiske hjemmeside for liberalismen - www.liberalismen.dk

2 3

Jumping on new TCP connection during a SIP session?
by Abdoul Osséni 04 Jun '18

04 Jun '18

Hello group, The call flow is: useragent (TLS) -> Kamailio -> Sems Server. During the establishment of a call (before the 200OK or during a retransmission of the 200OK issued by Sems Server via Kamailio), if a user agent (TCP) loses its connection (the user agent is on a mobile network for example or the network is not reliable.) and sends a "register" to Kamailio (same source IP address but a different source TCP port), is it possible for Kamailio to take into account this new TCP port with the function t_relay () ? Abdoul

4 4

Module sanity - memory leaks
by Konstantin Polyakov 04 Jun '18

04 Jun '18

Hello, We had memory leak on a production server and to find it we removed optional modules one by one. As result we found that problem is in the sanity module. Unfortunately I don't have time to fix it since I am going to vacation. We used the following checks: ruri_sip_version (1), required_headers (4), cseq_method (32), cseq_value (64), cotent_length (128), expires_value (256), proxy_require (512), parse uri's (1024). So be aware that this module is not ready to use in production. Best regards, Konstantin

1 0

configuring websockts in kamilio
by vinod mn 04 Jun '18

04 Jun '18

hi configured websockets on kamilio 5.1.3 I am trying to register the client based on webrtc client ,(sip.js) the registration is fine but i am not getting the correct address if i run "*kamctl ul show"* * In the address filed I want the sip:<id>@<ip>:<port>ex: sip:12345@127.0.0.1:12345 <http://sip:12345@127.0.0.1:12345> * output shows: { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { "Domains": [{ "Domain": { "Domain": "location", "Size": 1024, "AoRs": [{ "Info": { "AoR": "1xxxxxxxxx", "HashID": 1xxxxx, "Contacts": [{ "Contact": { *"Address": "sip:eg84vjhr@p6ggglrk0gsh.invalid;transport=ws"*, "Expires": 397, "Q": 1, "Call-ID": "ma4feu2i43bnu6ophe4k78", "CSeq": 86, "User-Agent": "SIP.js/0.5.0-devel BB", "Received": "sip:X.X.X.X:56087;transport=ws", "Path": "[not set]", "State": "CS_NEW", "Flags": 0, "CFlags": 192, "Socket": "tcp:X.X.X.X:8080", "Methods": 783, "Ruid": "uloc-5b116457-1dc1-03", "Instance": "<urn:uuid:0e879ebf-0a31-45a8-9fd9-6b937d3328d4>", "Reg-Id": 1, "Server-Id": 0, "Tcpconn-Id": 259, "Keepalive": 1, "Last-Keepalive": 1527876355, "Last-Modified": 1527876355 } }] } } ], "Stats": { "Records": 1, "Max-Slots": 1 } } }] }, "id": 18958 } In the address filed I want the sip:<id>@<ip>:<port> ex: sip:12345@127.0.0.1:12345 Please give me any suggestions on this, which webrtc client can i use to register to kamailio and able to receive on the client and to make outbound calls from the client. -- Thanks and regards Vinod.M.N

2 1

Kamailio Behind TCP Load Balancer
by Colin Morelli 04 Jun '18

04 Jun '18

Hey all, I'm looking to put Kamailio behind a TCP load balancer that is SIP-unaware. My application is deployed in AWS and I'm tying to place Kamailio behind an ELB. For the most part, everything is fine. For my specific implementation I'm disabling UDP as a signaling transport and using only TLS. This enables me to not have to worry about a SIP-aware LB at the edge because replies to an incoming request will be sent over the existing established TCP socket (avoiding any crazy routing requirements). However - this poses an issue with source addresses. Does Kamailio support anything like the proxy protocol ( http://www.haproxy.org/download/1.5/doc/proxy-protocol.txt) for getting TCP stream information from a load balancer? Do I need to go back to exposing it directly to the world so that I can get source addresses? Thanks, Colin

3 4

Re: [SR-Users] configuring websockts in kamilio
by Konstantin Polyakov 02 Jun '18

02 Jun '18

Hello Vinod, We used Doubango sipML5 web phone https://www.doubango.org/sipml5/call.htm?svn=252 It was quite good for debugging and testing webrtc calls. Most of work in kamailio config I made by using that client. Best regards. Konstantin > >Message: 8 >Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 23:50:50 +0530 >From: vinod mn < vinodmn.dbit(a)gmail.com > >To: sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >Subject: [SR-Users] configuring websockts in kamilio >Message-ID: >< CAHeWXy7h4Tcp4Sg9_eM3teCHBdJ5bwHa9TYSJy+7P4e+bm1hqQ(a)mail.gmail.com > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >hi configured websockets on kamilio 5.1.3 >I am trying to register the client based on webrtc client ,(sip.js) > the registration is fine but i am not getting the correct address if i >run "*kamctl ul show"* > > >* In the address filed I want the sip:<id>@<ip>:<port>ex: >sip:12345@127.0.0.1:12345 < http://sip:12345@127.0.0.1:12345 > * >output shows: >{ > "jsonrpc": "2.0", > "result": { > "Domains": [{ > "Domain": { > "Domain": "location", > "Size": 1024, > "AoRs": [{ > "Info": { > "AoR": "1xxxxxxxxx", > "HashID": 1xxxxx, > "Contacts": [{ > "Contact": { > *"Address": >"sip:eg84vjhr@p6ggglrk0gsh.invalid;transport=ws"*, > "Expires": 397, > "Q": 1, > "Call-ID": "ma4feu2i43bnu6ophe4k78", > "CSeq": 86, > "User-Agent": "SIP.js/0.5.0-devel BB", > "Received": "sip:X.X.X.X:56087;transport=ws", > "Path": "[not set]", > "State": "CS_NEW", > "Flags": 0, > "CFlags": 192, > "Socket": "tcp:X.X.X.X:8080", > "Methods": 783, > "Ruid": "uloc-5b116457-1dc1-03", > "Instance": >"<urn:uuid:0e879ebf-0a31-45a8-9fd9-6b937d3328d4>", > "Reg-Id": 1, > "Server-Id": 0, > "Tcpconn-Id": 259, > "Keepalive": 1, > "Last-Keepalive": 1527876355, > "Last-Modified": 1527876355 > } > }] > } > } > ], > "Stats": { > "Records": 1, > "Max-Slots": 1 > } > } > }] > }, > "id": 18958 >} > >In the address filed I want the sip:<id>@<ip>:<port> >ex: sip:12345@127.0.0.1:12345 > >Please give me any suggestions on this, which webrtc client can i use to >register to kamailio and able to receive on the client and to make outbound >calls from the client. > >-- >Thanks and regards >Vinod.M.N >

1 0

CDRs
by David Villasmil 02 Jun '18

02 Jun '18

Hello guys, I setup the CDRs according to the instructions on https://kb.asipto.com/siremis:install40x:accounting I get CDRs nicely, but the cdrs, even though they have a src_ip, there's no dest_ip, I mean I need the IP where the call was forwarded to... What do i need to do to get that in the cdr? Thanks! David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 ᐧ

2 1

Upgrade issue from 4.4.7 to 5.1.3
by Kevin Greene 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Hello List users: I am trying to upgrade to the current version of Kamailio from the older 4.4 version to the current version. The 4.4 is functional but there are some features of 5.1 that we wanted to test with. It seems that my version of Linux (RHEL 6.9 or Oracle 6.9) has an issue with a library file. Any help would be useful. Thank you. Kevin Notes: I used the "yum update kamailio" function. (edited for clarity - it showed a long list of modules to be updated) "--> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: kamailio-http-utils-4.4.7-1.1.x86_64 (@home_kamailio_v4.4.x-rpms) Requires: kamailio = 4.4.7 Removing: kamailio-4.4.7-1.1.x86_64 (@home_kamailio_v4.4.x-rpms) kamailio = 4.4.7-1.1 Updated By: kamailio-5.1.3-1.el6.x86_64 (home_kamailio_v5.1.x-rpms) kamailio = 5.1.3-1.el6 Error: Package: kamailio-http-utils-4.4.7-1.1.x86_64 (@home_kamailio_v4.4.x-rpms) Requires: libkmi.so.1()(64bit) Removing: kamailio-4.4.7-1.1.x86_64 (@home_kamailio_v4.4.x-rpms) libkmi.so.1()(64bit) Updated By: kamailio-5.1.3-1.el6.x86_64 (home_kamailio_v5.1.x-rpms) Not found Error: Package: kamailio-xml-4.4.7-1.1.x86_64 (@home_kamailio_v4.4.x-rpms) Requires: kamailio = 4.4.7 Removing: kamailio-4.4.7-1.1.x86_64 (@home_kamailio_v4.4.x-rpms) kamailio = 4.4.7-1.1 Updated By: kamailio-5.1.3-1.el6.x86_64 (home_kamailio_v5.1.x-rpms) kamailio = 5.1.3-1.el6 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest" However the "missing" library is there in /usr/lib64. [root@sipserver tmp]# find / -name libkmi.so.1 /usr/lib64/kamailio/libkmi.so.1 /usr/lib64/libkmi.so.1 /lib64/libkmi.so.1 To provide additional help, See: [root@sipserver tmp]# kamailio -version version: kamailio 4.4.7 (x86_64/linux) 35d8ab flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 35d8ab compiled on 15:38:14 Feb 26 2018 with gcc 4.4.7

2 1

configuring the websocket in kamailio 5.1
by vinod mn 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Hi, I configured the websocket in kamailio and it is running properly, which is the best webrtc client (with proper code as I dont't want to spend more time in writing the codes based on the example snippets ) can I use for registering, and making/ receiving the calls on the webrtc-client . requirement: webrtc-client(??)->register-> kamailio(already configured to use websocket) webrtc-client -> makecall to kamailio webrtc-client receives call from another client(sip not webrtc-client) -- Thanks and regards Vinod.M.N

1 0

Thank You
by Wilkins, Steve 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Hi All, I normally get on this board to ask questions but today I just wanted to take a minute and say - Thank you to all of you who have taken the time to help me. Some of you have spent a lot of time schooling me on Kamailio, its Interactions with a PBX and different clients. I have learned tons from this board and just want to say again, Thank You All! -Steve

2 1

Multiple CDR rate groups using Siremis sql procedures
by Sergiu Pojoga 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Hi, The SQL procedure takes a param, rgroup, which is default (by default). That works fine. In a real case scenario, having multiple rate groups, I wonder what's the best approach to rate CDRs based on the rate group a client belongs to? Do you store the rate_group in the ACC table and then adjust 'kamailio_cdrs' and 'kamailio_rating' procedures to take into account the rate_group of a CDR? If so, does anybody have a working example? Thanks.

1 0

Anybody using 2 instances with topos communicating with each other?
by Daniel Tryba 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Scenario: endpoint (bob) <-> kamailio proxy (5.1.3) <-> kamailio backend (5.1.2) Both kamailio instances are running the topos module (mysql backend). Call setup is fine, but forwarding BYEs fail. With a call from endpoint to kamailio, topos on the proxy scrambles Contact to kamailio backend. But in responses from backend contact remains untouched. In the ACK to the 200, topos on the proxy does nothing. If the caller hangsup, the BYE will loop internally till max hops is exceeded (483 which will be send to caller eventually). When the backend initiates the call to the endpoint, topos appears to work, but the BYE from the endpoint on hangup get a 404 Not here from the proxy (route[WITHINDLG]). Disabling topos on the proxy will result in a functioning proxy (config attached). Is there something wrong with my config? Or is this an unforseen scenario that just doesn't work with topos? * Endpoint to backend scenario endpoint:5060 -> proxy:5060 INVITE sip:callee@sip.pocos.nl;transport=tcp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;rport;branch=... Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:proxy:5060;lr> Contact: <sip:bob@endpoint:5060;ob> proxy:5060 -> backend:5060 INVITE sip:callee@sip.itco.nl;transport=tcp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy;branch=... CSeq: 29848 INVITE Route: <sip:proxy:5060;lr> Contact: <sip:btpsh-5af5972d-bf5e-2@proxy> backend:5060 -> proxy:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy;branch=... Contact: <sip:atpsh-5af19bf0-9f94-7@backend> proxy:5060 -> endpoint:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Contact: <sip:atpsh-5af19bf0-9f94-7@backend> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;received=endpoint;rport=5060;branch=... Record-Route: <sip:proxy;lr> endpoint:5060 -> proxy:5060 ACK sip:atpsh-5af19bf0-9f94-7@backend SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;rport;branch=... Route: <sip:proxy;lr> proxy:5060 -> backend:5060 ACK sip:atpsh-5af19bf0-9f94-7@backend SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy;branch=... Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;received=endpoint;rport=5060;branch=... endpoint:5060 -> proxy:5060 BYE sip:atpsh-5af19bf0-9f94-7@backend SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;rport;branch=... Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:proxy;lr> proxy:5060 -> proxy:5060 BYE sip:atpsh-5af19bf0-9f94-7@backend SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy;branch=... Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;received=endpoint;rport=5060;branch=... Max-Forwards: 69 Route: <sip:proxy;lr> proxy:5060 -> proxy:5060 BYE sip:atpsh-5af19bf0-9f94-7@backend SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy;branch=... Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy;rport=5060;branch=... Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;received=endpoint;rport=5060;branch=... Max-Forwards: 68 Route: <sip:proxy;lr> [not going to mention the 50+ BYEs adding Vias and decrementing Max-Forwards. * Backend to endpoint scenario backend:5060 -> proxy:5060 INVITE sip:bob@endpoint:5060;ob SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP backend;branch=... Route: <sip:loadbalancer@proxy;lr;received=sip:endpoint:5060> Contact: <sip:btpsh-5af07a27-72b-502c1@backend> proxy:5060 -> endpoint:5060 INVITE sip:bob@endpoint:5060;ob SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy;branch=... Contact: <sip:btpsh-5af5972d-bf5d-5@proxy> endpoint:5060 -> proxy:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP proxy;received=proxy;branch=... Contact: <sip:bob@endpoint:5060;ob> proxy:5060 -> backend:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Contact: <sip:bob@endpoint:5060;ob;alias=endpoint~5060~1> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP backend;rport=5060;branch=... Record-Route: <sip:proxy;lr> endpoint:5060 -> proxy:5060 BYE sip:btpsh-5af5972d-bf5d-5@proxy SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;rport;branch=... proxy:5060 -> endpoint:5060 SIP/2.0 404 Not here Via: SIP/2.0/UDP endpoint:5060;rport=5060;branch=...

2 2

Dispatcher module ERROR
by Aleksandar Sosic 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Hi everyone, We have an error using the dispatcher module. In the logs: ```0(107) ERROR: dispatcher [dispatcher.c:815]: ds_warn_fixup(): failover functions used, but required AVP parameters are NULL -- feature disabled``` We are running 5.2.0~dev5+0~20180523010152.1118+xenial The configuration file parts regarding dispatcher are as follows: ``` loadmodule "dispatcher.so" ... # ----- dispatcher params ----- modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/tmp/dispatcher.list") # Dispatcher: Enable Failover-Support modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) # Dispatcher: Overwrite Destination address, if required. modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1) # AVP's required for Fail-Over-Support: modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(DISPATCHER_DST_AVP)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(DISPATCHER_GRP_AVP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(DISPATCHER_CNT_AVP)") # Try to recover disabled destinations every 15 seconds. modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 15) # Actively query the gateways: modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode",0)# ----- dispatcher params ----- modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/tmp/dispatcher.list") # Dispatcher: Enable Failover-Support modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) # Dispatcher: Overwrite Destination address, if required. modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1) # AVP's required for Fail-Over-Support: modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(DISPATCHER_DST_AVP)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(DISPATCHER_GRP_AVP)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(DISPATCHER_CNT_AVP)") # Try to recover disabled destinations every 15 seconds. modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 15) # Actively query the gateways: modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode",0)``` What are we doing wrong? What are we missing? Thanks, -- Aleksandar Sosic linkedin.com/in/alexsosic/ mail: alex.sosic(a)evosip.cloud

2 2

Authenticate against outbound carrier
by Krzysztof Grobelak 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Hello List, I have a working setup with a kamailio + freeswitch where i can register extension and make succesfull calls between them. I added now a "external" path for outbound call to which i can successfully route using the dialplan + dispatcher combo. My problem is that my outbound path requires authentication and i'm struggling to find a way to successfully authenticate with the remote end. I configured the UAC module to register against the remote end with a set of credentials but in the SIP trace i can see that the kamailio simply uses the local user credentials instead of the external ones. I believe that this is because the 401 Unauthorized from the carrier gets proxied to the extension which responds with its own credentials. Can anybody suggest how can i stop forwarding them in this case to extension and instead use the UAC to reply with different set of credentials? Regards, Krzysztof The config: request_route { ... if($rU=~"[0-9]{5,}"){ xlog("L_INFO","Looking up route for $rU\n"); dp_match("1", "$rU"); $var(dsid) = $(var(attrs){s.int}); if(!ds_select_dst("$var(dsid)", "4")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } if(!ds_select_domain("$var(dsid)", "4")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } xlog("L_INFO", "Looking up $fn in database\n"); $avp(s:auth_realm_avp) = "realm.com"; $avp(s:auth_username_avp) = "username"; $avp(s:auth_password_avp) = "password"; if(uac_reg_request_to("$fn", 1)) { xlog("L_INFO", "Found remote user [$rU] on [$rd] via [$du]"); t_on_failure("REMOTE_AUTH"); xlog("L_INFO", "going to <$ru> via <$du>\n"); route(RELAY); } exit; } failure_route[REMOTE_AUTH] { if ($T_reply_code == 401 or $T_reply_code == 407) { xlog("L_INFO", "Remote asked for authentication"); uac_auth(); } } -- PGP: 9E5D E635 5A03 485C 2E00 4530 EB83 920A 9E21 FBA8

1 0

Acc module and PostgreSQL
by Javohir Maxmarajabov 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Is it possible to enable accounting module with PostgreSQL? All I found is documentation and examples that showing accounting module is used with MySQL module. -- Javokhir M.M. ________________________________________________ Disclaimer: The information in this e-mail is confidential. If you are not addressed recipient then please return and delete this e-mail from your system. Unauthorised use of or disclose the contents of this e-mail may be unlawful.

2 1

Strange behavior with $shtinc
by Brooks Bridges 01 Jun '18

01 Jun '18

Let me preface this with the statement that as best I can tell from docs and code, this function is supposed to be 100% atomic and this shouldn't be able to happen. I also have not found anything in the module's github commit logs that would indicate this behavior has changed from previous versions. That being said, I appear to have run into an oddity where intermittently I'm getting 2 slots being put in the same entry, which results in trying to parse the output for graphing and reporting not working quite right. The mechanism I'm using is a very simple counter mechanism to record statistics about calls. As an example, I am using the following mechanism: $var(z) = $shtinc(callstats=>$avp(realm),cps_exceeded); or $var(z) = $shtinc(callstats=>$avp(realm),sessions_exceeded); This typically results in something like this: { entry: 4335 size: 1 slot: { { name: realm1,total_requests value: 2365034 type: int } } } { entry: 4532 size: 1 slot: { { name: realm2,cps_exceeded value: 30 type: int } } } And so on... However, one or more of them sometimes end up like this: { entry: 4646 size: 2 slot: { { name: realm1,total_requests value: 15958026 type: int } { name: realm2,cps_exceeded value: 6432103 type: int } } } Thanks in advance for your help and/or suggestions! Brooks Bridges | Engineering Manager O1 Communications 4359 Town Center Boulevard, Suite 217 El Dorado Hills, California 95762 office: 916.235.2097 | main: 888.444.1111, Option 2 email: bbridges(a)o1.com<mailto:bbridges@o1.com> | web: www.o1.com<http://www.o1.com/>

3 5

Authentication against outbound carrier trunk
by Krzysztof Grobelak 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hello List, I have a working setup with a kamailio + freeswitch where i can register extension and make succesfull calls between them. I added now a "external" path for outbound call to which i can successfully route using the dialplan + dispatcher combo. My problem is that my outbound path requires authentication and i'm struggling to find a way to successfully authenticate with the remote end. I configured the UAC module to register against the remote end with a set of credentials but in the SIP trace i can see that the kamailio simply uses the local user credentials instead of the external ones. I believe that this is because the 401 Unauthorized from the carrier gets proxied to the extension which responds with its own credentials. Can anybody suggest how can i stop forwarding them in this case to extension and instead use the UAC to reply with different set of credentials? Regards, Krzysztof The config: request_route { ... if($rU=~"[0-9]{5,}"){ xlog("L_INFO","Looking up route for $rU\n"); dp_match("1", "$rU"); $var(dsid) = $(var(attrs){s.int}); if(!ds_select_dst("$var(dsid)", "4")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } if(!ds_select_domain("$var(dsid)", "4")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } xlog("L_INFO", "Looking up $fn in database\n"); $avp(s:auth_realm_avp) = "realm.com"; $avp(s:auth_username_avp) = "username"; $avp(s:auth_password_avp) = "password"; if(uac_reg_request_to("$fn", 1)) { xlog("L_INFO", "Found remote user [$rU] on [$rd] via [$du]"); t_on_failure("REMOTE_AUTH"); xlog("L_INFO", "going to <$ru> via <$du>\n"); route(RELAY); } exit; } failure_route[REMOTE_AUTH] { if ($T_reply_code == 401 or $T_reply_code == 407) { xlog("L_INFO", "Remote asked for authentication"); uac_auth(); } } -- PGP: 9E5D E635 5A03 485C 2E00 4530 EB83 920A 9E21 FBA8

1 0

error in tls configuration in kamailio 5.1.3
by Narasimhaiah, Vinod Maralenahalli 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hi, I upgraded kamailio 4.4.2 to kamailio5.1.3 and i am getting this error *"Unable to load certificate file '/etc/kamailio/kamailio-selfsigned.pem",* kamilio 4.4.2 does not need the ssl file, but kamailio 5.1.3 need ssl file, what changes required in kamailio 5.1.3 to run with tls. Please help me in resolving this issue. Thank you vinod.M.N -- To download the app, click: iOS <http://goo.gl/ZJx3y1> | Android <http://goo.gl/G1ehjZ> -- ***This transmission contains information that is confidential and proprietary of Kirusa Inc.,its affiliates and/or its partners and customers. This information is intended to be shared only with the recipient of this e-mail who is bound by confidentiality. If you received this e-mail in error, please delete the e-mail and notify the sender by return e-mail.***

4 4

Upgrade issue with old Kamailio 3.0.3 in table rls_presentity
by Kristijan Vrban 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hi, i try a upgrade from old 3.0.3 Kamailio mysql db. Got stuck with update the structure : ALTER TABLE rls_presentity MODIFY callid VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL;ALTER TABLE rls_presentity MODIFY contact VARCHAR(128) NOT NULL; found on: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/upgrade/3.1.x-to-3.2.0 But this two table does not exist? See also table definition at: https://kamailio.org/docs/db-tables/kamailio-db-3.1.x.html#GEN-DB-RLS-PRESE… I reckon it is safe to skip this to tables? Kristijan

2 4

Register on kamailio.org wiki page not working
by Kristijan Vrban 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hi, https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/start?do=register Is not working. You get a empty page here. Kristijan

2 2

Sharing static variables in external library across child proceses
by User 721 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hi, I am adding a kamailio module that references an external C library that maintains a hashtable in global scope. I am wondering what practice I should follow so that: - This hashtable (which I don't control directly) is shared by all child processes - The hashtable is changed by one child process at a time Thanks in advance

2 1

PIKE module
by Robert Barrera 31 May '18

31 May '18

Good morning! We operate a VoIP platform and are interested in integrating the PIKE module. Is it possible for someone to assist us to discuss how this can be done and our options? Thank you logo_nop Robert Barrera 305-663-8989 305-600-4786 fax info(a)myrealmobile.com Complete Business PBX phone systems and Nationwide wireless! REAL Mobile does it!

2 1

sip_msg structure and memory free
by Konstantin Polyakov 31 May '18

31 May '18

Hello All, There is a structure sip_msg which is passed into a module and represents a received sip message. It contains number of pointers to hdr_field members. In its turn hdr_field contains member void* parsed In the sanity module we assign to parsed member a pointer to newly allocated memory and we don't free that memory at the end. Do we need to free explicitly or this memory will be deallocated later together with sip_msg ? In other words is it memory leak or not? Best regards, Konstantin

2 1

General Kamailio with Asterisk (or another PBX) Opinion
by Wilkins, Steve 30 May '18

30 May '18

HI All, I am curious, for those of you who use Kamailio with Asterisk or another PBX. Who forwards Registrations to Asterisk or PBX, and who lets Kamailio maintain Registrations? Thanks All!

4 3

send CANCEL to caller after hitting fr_inv_timeout
by Sergiu Pojoga 29 May '18

29 May '18

TM's noisy_ctimer=1 seems to take care of sending a CANCEL to the callee, but it eludes me which tm param makes a CANCEL to be sent to caller as well? Caller gets a '408 Request Timeout' only, which in my case doesn't effectively terminate a call for the calling party. Merci.

1 0

INFO: stun_parse_header: incomplete header of STUN message
by Pan Christensen 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hello! After proxying a REGISTER from a WebRTC client to our SIP backend, the backend starts sending keepalives. Every 30 seconds I get a log entry in Kamailio saying: "INFO: stun [kam_stun.c:169]: stun_parse_header(): INFO: stun_parse_header: incomplete header of STUN message". Here's one such packet: No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 1 0.000000 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy UDP 60 5060 ? 15060 Len=4 Frame 1: 60 bytes on wire (480 bits), 60 bytes captured (480 bits) Ethernet II, Src: JuniperN_4f:3f:f0 (40:a6:77:4f:3f:f0), Dst: 02:81:64:58:cf:d1 (02:81:64:58:cf:d1) Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, Dst: yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy 0100 .... = Version: 4 .... 0101 = Header Length: 20 bytes (5) Differentiated Services Field: 0x00 (DSCP: CS0, ECN: Not-ECT) Total Length: 32 Identification: 0x5bf5 (23541) Flags: 0x4000, Don't fragment Time to live: 56 Protocol: UDP (17) Header checksum: 0x2fc3 [validation disabled] [Header checksum status: Unverified] Source: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Destination: yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 5060, Dst Port: 15060 Source Port: 5060 Destination Port: 15060 Length: 12 Checksum: 0xfa28 [unverified] [Checksum Status: Unverified] [Stream index: 0] Data (4 bytes) 0000 00 00 00 00 .... Data: 00000000 [Length: 4] I found this in kam_stun.c: static int stun_parse_header(struct stun_msg* req, USHORT_T* error_code) { if (sizeof(req->hdr) > req->msg.buf.len) { /* the received message does not contain whole header */ LOG(L_INFO, "INFO: stun_parse_header: incomplete header of STUN message\n"); /* Any better solution? IMHO it's not possible to send error response * because the transaction ID is not available. */ return FATAL_ERROR; } ... Could someone please explain what's wrong? Med vennlig hilsen Pan B. Christensen Utvikler Phonect AS Brugata 19, PB 9156 Grønland, N-0133 Oslo, Norway E-post: pan.christensen(a)phonect.no<mailto:pan.christensen@phonect.no> Mobil: 41 88 88 00 [cid:image007.png@01D3A0E8.376921D0] <http://www.phonect.no/> [facebook_2]<https://www.facebook.com/phonectno> [LinkedIn_logo_initials (1)] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/44983?trk=tyah&trkInfo=clickedVertical%3Ac…>

2 3

Dialplan module for load balancing
by igor.potjevlesch＠gmail.com 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hello, I'm maybe confused on how to use dialplan module. I have a dialplan setup for a long time now and I'd like to add a new rule with the same match_exp than an existing one but with a different repl_exp. If I set the same priority, the latest entry is used systematically. If I set priority +1, the new rule is never used. The goal is having two rules and alternatively reply with one or the other repl_exp. Is it possible? Regards, Igor.

1 0

Pkg memory stats
by Konstantin Polyakov 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hello, Could somebody explain what do numbers mean for command "kamcmd mod.stats all pkg"? Is there somewhere documentation about that? I can see the following information. " Module: xlog { mod_init(213): 4104 xlog_fixup_helper(533): 3176 xdbg_fixup_helper(499): 632 Total: 7912 } " I guess that numbers after colon are bytes. But what do numbers in (213) mean? When I use command "kamcmd pkg.stats", I got absolutely different numbers which don't match previous statistics? What is wrong? What is the best way to analyze pkg memory usage? Thank you Best regards Konstantin

1 0

Realtime Extensions SQLITE
by Benjamin Marty 29 May '18

29 May '18

I compiled a fresh Asterisk 13.18 certified with res_config_sqlite. I configured following: extconfig.conf [settings] sippeers => sqlite,asterisk,ast_config res_config_sqlite.conf [general] dbfile => /home/myuser/database.db On Bootup it gives the following error: [May 29 17:07:14] WARNING[32444]: res_config_sqlite.c:1206 realtime_multi_handler: no such table: ast_config Is the sqlite module deprecated or is my configuration wrong? Couldn't really find any documentation on that topic. The table ast_config is definitely present in the sqlite file.

2 1

Serial forking
by igor.potjevlesch＠gmail.com 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hello, I know that the default behaviour of two aliases in kamailio.aliases result in parallel forking. I'm wondering if its possible to do serial forking instead? For example, in case that the first INVITE has no 180/183, or neither 100 Trying, then send the INVITE to the second entry? Regards, Igor.

2 2

Switching form UDP to TCP causes authentication errors
by Wilkins, Steve 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hello All, When I switched from UDP to TCP I started getting Authentication Errors, Asterisk responds to an INVITE via Kamailio with a '401 Unauthorized', but Kamailio does nothing with it. Processing just stops near WITH_BLOCK401407. Shouldn't the 401 be relayed so a new INVITE can be sent? Thank you.

3 4

ims_isc: 3rd party Registration (S-CSCF) and P-Associated-Uri header
by Valentin Christoph 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hi, The function build_p_associated_uri() in module ims_isc filters for TEL URIs. Why are not ALL unbarred IMPUs added, but only TEL URIs? Is this specified in some 3GPP spec? Thanks, Christoph The information contained in this e-mail message is privileged and confidential and is for the exclusive use of the addressee. The person who receives this message and who is not the addressee, one of his employees or an agent entitled to hand it over to the addressee, is informed that he may not use, disclose or reproduce the contents thereof, and is kindly asked to notify the sender and delete the e-mail immediately.

1 0

jsonrpc http interface cant recognize method
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hi i trying to get htable.dump mytable via jsonrpc request {jsonrpc: "2.0", method: "htable.dump mytable"} { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error": { "code": 500, "message": "Method Not Found" } } But via kamcmd it wroks perfect Aslo i see that if i will make request withont param (core.version for example) IT works fime How to make request with param?

1 1

Carrierroute Wholesale termination issue
by riaz hasan 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hello, I am facing an issue with kamailio carrierroute.I have a setup where multiple asterisk is behind a kamailio server.I am able to dispatch the load by using carrierroute. Its working perfectly for retail users.But problem is its not working for wholesale users.I am attaching the dump for wholesale client. here is a little descrption for the shark:- 192.151.149.102 is the wholesale client ip. 46.166.139.60:4848 is kamailio server. 46.166.139.60:3628 is asterisk server. when 192.151.149.102 sends invite to 46.166.139.60:4848 [Kamailio] we are getting 401. [dump2.pcap] when 192.151.149.102 sends invite to 46.166.139.60:3628 [Direct Asterisk ] we are getting 200. [dump.pcap] here is the code i am using for load balancing:- route[Carrer] { #!ifdef WITH_CARRIERROUTE if (!cr_route("default", "default", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id")) { xlog("L_ERR", "cr_route failed\n"); exit; } #!endif $avp(s:host)= $rd+":"+$rp; t_on_failure("1"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } failure_route[1] { revert_uri(); #!ifdef WITH_CARRIERROUTE if (!cr_next_domain("default", "default", "$rU", "$avp(s:host)", "$T_reply_code", "$avp(s:domain)")) { xlog("L_ERR", "cr_next_domain failed\n"); exit; } if (!cr_route("default", "default", "$rU", "$rU", "call_id")) { xlog("L_ERR", "cr_route failed\n"); } t_on_failure("1"); route(NASIR); exit; #!endif $avp(s:host)= $rd+":"+$rp; if (!t_relay()) { xlog("L_ERR", "t_relay failed-custom\n"); exit; }; }

1 0

S-SCSF not forwarding SIP packets to AS
by John M 29 May '18

29 May '18

Hi All, My setup consists of Kamailio P-CSCF,I-SCSF , S-CSCF and OpenIMS HSS nodes and I have configured application server details and trigger point on HSS. I am using Boghe IMS client SIP validation. Whenever the client sends a REGISTER, messages are not reaching AS. In S-SCSF log files, I am seeing " isc_match_filter_reg(): No REGISTER match found in filter criteria" and " isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group" error message. Kmailio version: version: kamailio 5.1.3 (x86_64/linux) HSS XML The UserData XML document which is sent to the S-CSCF: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><IMSSubscription><PrivateID> alice(a)ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org </PrivateID><ServiceProfile><PublicIdentity><Identity> sip:alice@ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org </Identity><Extension><IdentityType>0</IdentityType></Extension></PublicIdentity><InitialFilterCriteria><Priority>0</Priority><TriggerPoint><ConditionTypeCNF>0</ConditionTypeCNF><SPT><ConditionNegated>0</ConditionNegated><Group>0</Group><Method>REGISTER</Method><Extension><RegistrationType>0</RegistrationType></Extension></SPT></TriggerPoint><ApplicationServer><ServerName>sip:192.168.20.10:5060 ;transport=TCP</ServerName><DefaultHandling>0</DefaultHandling></ApplicationServer></InitialFilterCriteria></ServiceProfile></IMSSubscription> SCSF Log-1 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [ims_isc_mod.c:428]: isc_match_filter_reg(): Checking triggers 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [ims_isc_mod.c:432]: isc_match_filter_reg(): Starting triggering 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [ims_isc_mod.c:446]: isc_match_filter_reg(): Orig User before clean: <sip:alice@ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org> [1] 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [ims_isc_mod.c:448]: isc_match_filter_reg(): Orig User after clean: <sip:alice@ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org> [1] 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:416]: isc_checker_find(): isc_checker_find: starting search 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:438]: isc_checker_find(): isc_checker_find(): got a r_public for the user sip:alice@ims.mnc001.mcc001.3gppnetwork.org 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:454]: isc_checker_find(): About to try p->s->service_profiles_cnt!! #profiles is 1 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:456]: isc_checker_find(): About to try p->s->service_profiles[a].filter_criterai_cnt 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:467]: isc_checker_find(): DEBUG ISC: SECOND TIME About to try p->s->service_profiles_cnt!! 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:471]: isc_checker_find(): DEBUG ISC : About to try p->s->service_profiles 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:474]: isc_checker_find(): DEBUG ISC : About to try public identities 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:477]: isc_checker_find(): DEBUG ISC : About to try WPSI 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:319]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: Starting expression check: 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:239]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 2 -> Method == PUBLISH ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:241]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found method REGISTER 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:340]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:239]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 2 -> Method == PUBLISH ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:241]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found method REGISTER 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:333]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group 1 => 0. 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:340]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:239]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 2 -> Method == SUBSCRIBE ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:241]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found method REGISTER 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:333]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group 2 => 0. 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:340]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:239]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 2 -> Method == SUBSCRIBE ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:241]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found method REGISTER 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:333]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group 3 => 0. 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:340]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:348]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: Check finished => 0 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [ims_isc_mod.c:460]: isc_match_filter_reg(): No REGISTER match found in filter criteria SCSF Log-2 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:239]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 2 -> Method == PUBLISH ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:241]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found method SUBSCRIBE 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:340]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:239]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 2 -> Method == PUBLISH ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:241]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found method SUBSCRIBE 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:333]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group 1 => 0. 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:340]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:239]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 2 -> Method == SUBSCRIBE ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:241]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found method SUBSCRIBE 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:333]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group 2 => 1. 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:252]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 3 -> Header[Event] %= .*presence.* ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:88]: isc_check_headers(): isc_check_headers: Looking for Header[Event(22)] .*presence.* 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:99]: isc_check_headers(): isc_check_headers: Found Header[Event(22)] message-summary 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:99]: isc_check_headers(): isc_check_headers: Found Header[Allow-Events(39)] refer, presence, presence.winfo, xcap-diff, conference 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:261]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 4 -> Session Case == 1 ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:263]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found session_case 0 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:340]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:239]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 2 -> Method == SUBSCRIBE ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:241]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found method SUBSCRIBE 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:333]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group 3 => 1. 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:252]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 3 -> Header[Event] %= .*presence.* ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:88]: isc_check_headers(): isc_check_headers: Looking for Header[Event(22)] .*presence.* 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:99]: isc_check_headers(): isc_check_headers: Found Header[Event(22)] message-summary 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:99]: isc_check_headers(): isc_check_headers: Found Header[Allow-Events(39)] refer, presence, presence.winfo, xcap-diff, conference 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:261]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: SPT type 4 -> Session Case == 2 ? 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:263]: isc_check_spt(): ifc_check_spt: Found session_case 0 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:340]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: - group compromised, skipping to next group 0(1541) DEBUG: ims_isc [checker.c:348]: isc_check_filter_criteria(): ifc_checker_trigger: Check finished => 0 Regards, Uts

1 0

Kamailio 5.1.x - Dialog event route not fired
by Loic Chabert 28 May '18

28 May '18

Hi list, I'm facing a strange behaviour with dialog module and stop event route. When a BYE request has been receved by Kamailio, no stop event route has been fired but dialog state go to 5. My config is following this guide: http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k43-blf Using dialog_manage on RELAY route, as describe on this guide. If i set more debug information, i can see dialog has been found and dialog status incremented : 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/udp_server.c:491]: udp_rcv_loop(): received on udp socket: (106/100/818) [[BYE sip:172.16.74.201:5060;prxroute=1 SIP/2.0 0D 0A Record-Route: <sip:172.16.74.24;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=1;ng]] 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:604]: parse_msg(): SIP Request: 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:606]: parse_msg(): method: <BYE> 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:608]: parse_msg(): uri: <sip:172.16.74.201:5060;prxroute=1> 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): version: <SIP/2.0> 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bKc2c.939fa953ea648059586a7f684fd56b5a.0>; state=16 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:492]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=2 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:494]: parse_headers(): this is the first via 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 235, <rport> = <5060>; state=6 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param(): Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-69-1-10>; state=16 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of header reached, state=5 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:492]: parse_headers(): Via found, flags=78 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:505]: parse_headers(): this is the second via 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:185]: parse_to_param(): add param: tag=f651e13a-0aac-40d5-b877-1c24497ff87c 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field(): <To> [87]; uri=[sip:+33975181257@sip.testinfratrunk.vox.fr] 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:172]: get_hdr_field(): to body [<sip:+33975181257@sip.testinfratrunk.vox.fr>] 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:152]: get_hdr_field(): cseq <CSeq>: <3> <BYE> 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:232]: receive_msg(): --- received sip message - request - call-id: [1-69(a)60.0.0.30] - cseq: [3 BYE] 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/receive.c:287]: receive_msg(): preparing to run routing scripts... 1(7) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:74]: is_maxfwd_present(): value = 69 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:185]: parse_to_param(): add param: tag=1 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]: parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=29 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:183]: get_hdr_field(): content_length=0 1(7) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:89]: get_hdr_field(): found end of header 1(7) DEBUG: sanity [sanity_mod.c:256]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 1 1(7) NOTICE: <script>: {1 3 BYE 1-69(a)60.0.0.30} Initialisation des variables. 1(7) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1018]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7ffa420727d8) id=2 global id=1 T start=(nil) 1(7) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:476]: t_lookup_request(): start searching: hash=3116, isACK=0 1(7) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:435]: matching_3261(): RFC3261 transaction matching failed 1(7) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:659]: t_lookup_request(): no transaction found 1(7) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1087]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7ffa420727d8) id=2 global id=2 T end=(nil) 1(7) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:123]: has_totag(): totag found 1(7) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:113]: find_first_route(): No Route headers found 1(7) DEBUG: rr [loose.c:960]: loose_route(): There is no Route HF 1(7) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1018]: t_check_msg(): msg (0x7ffa420727d8) id=2 global id=2 T start=(nil) 1(7) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1094]: t_check_msg(): T previously sought and not found for msg (0x7ffa420727d8) 1(7) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:768]: internal_get_dlg(): ref dlg 0x7ffa327dd588 with 1 -> 3 1(7) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:770]: internal_get_dlg(): dialog callid=' 1-69(a)60.0.0.30' found on entry 3063, dir=1 1(7) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_profile.c:536]: set_current_dialog(): setting current dialog [3063:9173] 1(7) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:1151]: next_state_dlg(): dialog 0x7ffa327dd588 changed from state 4 to state 5, due event 7 (ref 3) 1(7) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:932]: dlg_ref_helper(): ref op on 0x7ffa327dd588 with 1 from dlg_handlers.c:1389 1(7) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_hash.c:936]: dlg_ref_helper(): ref dlg 0x7ffa327dd588 with 1 -> 4 1(7) DEBUG: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1400]: dlg_onroute(): BYE successfully processed Do you have any hints concerning this issue ? Is it a bug or a config part is missing ? Thanks in advance, Best regards.

2 1

Loop Detect - 482 Merged Request
by Amar Tinawi 28 May '18

28 May '18

Hello All i'm facing strange behavior with Zoiper Client only in an IMS Kamailio based system. in IMS call scenario (ims to ims) a lot of Loop Detect Msgs Appeared in the sip log. while other clients like Acrobits did not occurred i'm using TCP protocol and Wireshark shows a lot of (TCP Re-transmission and TCP ACKed unseen Segment) Any Suggestion Thanks !

1 0

Link problem between kamailio and MariaDB
by Ginhoux, Patrick 28 May '18

28 May '18

Hi, At the moment, I'm trying to replace MySQL by MariaDB on my Kamailio server (5.0.1) . In previous post I have been told that Kamailio supports MariaDB and there is no special module to load. This work is done on a new server running RHEL 7.4 and MariaDB 10.2.14 that is installed under /opt/mysql/na/10.2.14 folder. I encounter different problem: - Without changing anything in the kamailio script, kamailio failed to find the libmysqlclient.so.18 library. - So I thought that I could get rid of the above error by changing the MODULEPATH in the Kamailio-local.cfg as follows : MODULEPATH="/usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/:/opt/mysql/na/10.2.14/lib64/" But with this, I get 2 problem: The kamailio.log that was written in a /opt/log/Kamailio folder is no longer updated. I can only find the errors in the /var/log/messages file: May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 systemd: Starting SYSV: Kamailio is a fast, reliable and flexible SIP Server.... May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: Not starting : invalid configuration file! May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/cfg.lex:1822]: pp_define_get(): ### returning define ID [DEFINE_LOG_FACILITY] value [LOG_LOCAL0] May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/cfg.lex:1822]: pp_define_get(): ### returning define ID [LOCAL_LISTEN] value [udp:129.227.82.109:5060] May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/cfg.lex:1822]: pp_define_get(): ### returning define ID [LOCAL_LISTEN_2] value [udp:127.0.0.1:5060] May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/cfg.lex:1822]: pp_define_get(): ### returning define ID [MODULEPATH] value ["/usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/:/opt/mysql/na/10.2.14/lib64/"] May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/cfg.y:1632]: yyparse(): loading modules under /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/:/opt/mysql/na/10.2.14/lib64/ May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/cfg.y:1613]: yyparse(): loading module db_mysql.so May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:575]: load_module(): trying to load </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/db_mysql.so> May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:582]: load_module(): could not open module </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/db_mysql.so>: libmysqlclient.so.18: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3401]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file //etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 191, column 12-24: failed to load module May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/cfg.y:1613]: yyparse(): loading module jsonrpcs.so May 23 11:19:19 vm-siprouter74 kamailio: 0(3328) DEBUG: <core> [core/sr_module.c:575]: load_module(): trying to load </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/jsonrpcs.so> To work around the problem we have created 2 symbol links: <<< ln -s /opt/mysql/na/10.2.14/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.18.0.0 /usr/lib64/libmysqlclient.so.18 >>> the libmysqlclient error <<< ln -s /myqdata/mysiprdb/data/my.cnf /etc/my.cnf >>> to fix the issue to open the db It seems that kamailio is always looking for the my.cnf in the /etc/ directory. My concern are to share this job with people who have much more experience with Kamailio. I would like to know - If the different workaround (ln) makes sense to you or is there better change to do - How to explain the logging issue when changing the modulepath variable - Is it true that kamailio is always looking for the my.cnf in the /etc/ directory? Any thoughts are welcome. Thanks in advance. Cordialement. Patrick GINHOUX

2 2

Developer Guide
by Igor Olhovskiy 27 May '18

27 May '18

Hi! Is http://www.asipto.com/pub/kamailio-devel-guide/ still holds actual info? Cause it’s mostly for 3.3 version, and now is 5.1 And where to read, except source code of course, about how to develop modules for Kamailio? Regards, Igor

2 1

Compact Headers
by Duarte Rocha 26 May '18

26 May '18

Greetings, Is there any method on Kamailio that automatically rewrites the headers in its compact form ? I know how i can do it by re-writing each of the eligible headers, but i was wondering if there is any way to do it automatically. Thanks

2 1

UAC Module Registration Table
by Greg Adams 25 May '18

25 May '18

Hey there, I am currently using the UAC module to maintain remote registrations. I am just curious if it is possible to register new users immediately rather than waiting for reg_timer_interval? I am not seeing any functionality like that but just wondering if I am missing something or if it would be possible to add in. For example an RPC command that takes a key and instantly registers that user. Thanks, Greg ________________________________

1 0

kamailio.org server maintenance work
by Oriol Capsada 25 May '18

25 May '18

Hello, A kamailio.org server maintenance work will be done today at 18:00 CEST. There will be some minutes of downtime (should be less than 5') of the following main services: website (including the wiki) and mailing lists. Regards, Oriol.

1 0

Kamailio does not receive anything after exit route
by Andrey Deykunov 25 May '18

25 May '18

Hi there, I've added a simple black list that rejects incoming requests (REGISTER and INVITE) containing certain text in the message body. Source IP addresses of the rejected requests are going to be banned and added to the ban list: route > { > ... > > > $var(ban_list_key) = $si + ":" + $sp; > if ($sht(ip_ban_list=>$var(ban_list_key)) != $null) { > xlog("L_INFO", "$var(log_fmt_tag) The incoming $rm request > from: $fU, si: $si, sp: $sp was rejected. The source host is temporarily > banned."); > sl_send_reply("400", "Bad request"); > exit; > } > > ... > > if (method=="REGISTER" || method=="INVITE") { > sht_iterator_start("i1", "black_list"); > while(sht_iterator_next("i1")) { > $var(term_is_in_wl) = 0; > $var(collision_idx) = 0; > while($sht(white_list=>$fU[$var(collision_idx)]) != $null > ) { > if($shtitval(i1) == > $sht(white_list=>$fU[$var(collision_idx)])) { > $var(term_is_in_wl) = 1; > break; > } > $var(collision_idx) = $var(collision_idx) + 1; > } > if ($var(term_is_in_wl) == 0) { > if ( $mb =~ $shtitval(i1) ) { > # found a term from the black list. access denied. > xlog("L_INFO", "$var(log_fmt_tag) The incoming $rm > request from: $fU, si: $si, sp: $sp was rejected. SIP message body contains > a term from the black list - $shtitval(i1)"); > # add device to banlist > $var(ban_info) = "" + $Ts + "_" + $shtitval(i1); > $sht(ip_ban_list=>$var(ban_list_key)) = > $var(ban_info); > xlog("L_INFO", "$var(log_fmt_tag) The source host > $si:$sp was banned for 1 hour."); > sht_iterator_end("i1"); > sl_send_reply("400", "Bad request"); > exit; > } > } > } > sht_iterator_end("i1"); > } > ... > } All works fine with UPD, but using TCP, kamailio ceases to accept any requests. Please take a look, what do I wrong. Thanks, Andrey

2 1

Performance Testing Kamailio 5.1 as SIP300 LCR on AWS - Recommendation on Tools and Methods
by KamDev Essa 24 May '18

24 May '18

I am currently setup with Kamailio 5.1 on an AWS t2.micro as a SIP300 LCR solution with a http_query call to an external resource (c# .NetCore app for LRN dip and MySQL Route choices) to get the contacts string, tag it to the Contact header an send 300. Its been a while since I have performance tested on SIP and It was SIPp. - Is http_query a bad choice for performance. Is KEMI better? - Are there any better free apps than SIPp? - Has anyone got cps stats for a SIP300 only Kamailio instance on AWS - Is AWS a bad choice for prime time LCR. Any gory stories? KD

2 3

SIP Server Hardware or VM ??
by Pinter, Gerd. 24 May '18

24 May '18

Hallo there, we are a Broadcasting Network with about 50 Stations and try to establish our own SIP Network for high quality Audio over IP with Bitrates of 192-256 kbit for transmitting an accurate stereo signal. Since we encountered problems with connections via mobile Networks we set up our SIP Server as RTP Proxy which resolved all those multiple NAT issues. But on the other hand we pay for that with a higher jitter rate. The question is, if anyone has experience if this issue maybe can be solved by running the Sip Server on a standalone hardware plugged into network Port on our Hardware Firewall, instead of a virtual Machine running on VM with virtual switches and so on. The current SIP Server has a Public IP Address, but all the Traffic runs thru Firewall, VPN, Hardware Switches and Virtual Switches. What you think? Thanks a Lot Nice regards Gerhard Pinter

4 5

count of registered users or count of tls connections
by Karthik Srinivasan 24 May '18

24 May '18

Hello, Via the routing file i am trying to find access two items:

2 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users