sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

21 participants
37377 discussions

How to invoke RTPengine for re-Invite 200 OK within dialog
by Shah Hussain Khattak 27 Aug '24

27 Aug '24

Hello Experts, I need your advice on the following issue if you can kindly help. I am working on a hold call flow: UA - > Kamailio (RTP Engine) - > FS initial call establishes fine, RTP engine is invoked and SDP media IP is modified correctly. Then 1. I am receiving a hold re-invite with a send-only 2. I see Kamailio is changing the media IP in the SDP (with my RTP engine IP) when it sends the Invite to my core FS server. 3. FS sends 200 OK with a=recvonly 4. Kamailio relays the message as it is to the other leg. can someone advise me, on how can I invoke rtpengine at step 4, so the SDP is sent with my media server IP in the 200 OK? --- 200 OK from FS ---- SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 13.54.01.02:5060;branch=z9hG4bKd2e8.8a573af8d927f67c1db4550676f8be88.0;i=1 Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.10.117:51280;received=218.33.01.02;rport=51280;branch=z9hG4bKPj7d1d8968830d4ed3922eec7da7cdc17c;alias Record-Route: <sip:13.54.01.02:5060;r2=on;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:13.54.01.02;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr=on> From: <sip:0403225908@trunk.xyz.corp>;tag=6a180ffa7f824972a2c59ba47f293acb To: <sip:+61285038000@trunk.xyz.corp>;tag=DZrpcpgS1BDKF Call-ID: 4154062196634c34a2dbcb6b612bf44c CSeq: 12263 INVITE Contact: <sip:+61285038000@54.88.54.88:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent: UserAgentX/v1.0 Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY Require: timer Supported: timer, path, replaces Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uac Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 266 v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1724635755 1724635757 IN IP4 54.88.54.88 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 54.88.54.88 t=0 0 m=audio 21202 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=recvonly a=ptime:20 a=rtcp:21203 IN IP4 54.88.54.88 --- 200 OK relayed towards the UA ---- 2024/08/26 17:22:39.923639 172.16.8.126:5060 -> 218.33.78.33:51280 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 192.168.10.117:51280;received=218.33.01.02;rport=51280;branch=z9hG4bKPj7d1d8968830d4ed3922eec7da7cdc17c;alias Record-Route: <sip:13.54.01.02:5060;r2=on;lr=on> Record-Route: <sip:13.54.01.02;transport=tcp;r2=on;lr=on> From: <sip:0403225908@trunk.xyz.corp>;tag=6a180ffa7f824972a2c59ba47f293acb To: <sip:+61285038000@trunk.xyz.corp>;tag=DZrpcpgS1BDKF Call-ID: 4154062196634c34a2dbcb6b612bf44c CSeq: 12263 INVITE Contact: <sip:+61285038000@54.88.54.88:5060;transport=udp> User-Agent: UserAgentX/v1.0 Accept: application/sdp Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL, OPTIONS, MESSAGE, INFO, UPDATE, REGISTER, REFER, NOTIFY Require: timer Supported: timer, path, replaces Session-Expires: 1800;refresher=uac Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session Content-Length: 266 v=0 o=FreeSWITCH 1724635755 1724635757 IN IP4 54.88.54.88 s=FreeSWITCH c=IN IP4 54.88.54.88 t=0 0 m=audio 21202 RTP/AVP 8 101 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=recvonly a=ptime:20 a=rtcp:21203 IN IP4 54.88.54.88 my configs for within dialog route: ##### route[WITHINDLG] { append_hf("X-Test-Header: route_WITHINDLG\r\n"); if (has_totag()) { if (loose_route()) { if (is_method("BYE")) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting ... setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); # ... even if the transaction fails } if (is_method("ACK")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Relaying ACK\n"); } if (is_method("INVITE|UPDATE")) { if (has_body("application/sdp") && search_body("m=image") && search_body("T38")) { xlog("L_INFO", "T.38 re-INVITE detected, skipping rtpengine invocation\n"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "Non-T.38 INVITE detected, invoking rtpengine\n"); rtpengine_manage("replace-origin replace-session-connection"); } } route(RELAY); } else { if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE") && uri == myself) { route(PRESENCE); exit; } if (is_method("ACK")) { if (t_check_trans()) { t_relay(); exit; } else { exit; } } sl_send_reply("404","Not here"); } exit; } } ##### looking forward to your usual guidance. Thank you! Regards, Shah

2 2

socket names for command line parameter "listen"
by Xenofon Karamanos 23 Aug '24

23 Aug '24

Hello all, I wanted to inform you about an upcoming change regarding the syntax we use for defining socket names in the listen (-l) command line argument. Current Syntax: -l udp:10.10.10.10:5060/11.11.11.11:5060 Proposed Options: 1. -l udp:10.10.10.10:5060/11.11.11.11:5060=s1 2. -l s1=udp:10.10.10.10:5060/11.11.11.11:5060 ( A draft PR about this option can be found in https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3954) [https://opengraph.githubassets.com/69f8a4a1d2c8988372b4942f84bde95de94502d2…]<https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3954> main: Add support for naming socket in cli by xkaraman · Pull Request #3954 · kamailio/kamailio<https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3954> Pre-Submission Checklist Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...) Each component has a single... github.com Please note that the socket name (s1) in both options is/should be optional. The change will allow for better clarity and flexibility when defining sockets, particularly when a name needs to be assigned and match the config file style. I would appreciate your feedback on which syntax you find more intuitive or any concerns you might have with these options. Your input is important to ensure a smooth transition. Best regards, Xenofon

2 2

Kamailio cluster options
by Ali Taher 22 Aug '24

22 Aug '24

Hello all, I'm using Kamailio as SIP redirect (act as routing decision for SBC) depending mainly on sqlops and db_postgres modules, and it's working perfectly. What I need now is to have a kind of cluster of Kamailio servers for high availability purpose. What is the best option for me ? BR

2 1

push server tcp problem
by Bernd Krueger-Knauber 20 Aug '24

20 Aug '24

Hi, I implemented an apple and android push server/proxy with kamailio 5.8.1. The server/proxy is transparent. It works fine with UDP, since the registration after the push comes from the same ip and port. So t_continue works without problems. (We use the new registration as signal thet the phone is ready) If we use tcp at the client, he gets the push, wakes up and send the new registration on an other port. The SIP stack uses now an other connection. t_continue fails, because it uses the old data of the original invite acccording to the first registration. Is it possible to change the stored connection values according to the new registration data? Best regards, Bernd

2 2

low performance with udp_children and async_workers
by elhar.mohamed＠gmail.com 19 Aug '24

19 Aug '24

Hello, Based on business requirements, 35% of invites should be handled by async_workers and 65% with be handled by main children. The target is 1500cps. I'm using the following conf : children=64 async_worker=128 when doing performance tests using SIPp, I figured out the 1500cps is well supported by the conf above, but when I updated the data in database to not use anymore async workers, the cps is getting decreased and it was between 200 and 500. This a client requirements is to be able to enable/disable feature that needs to be handled by async workers. Could you please help me on this? Thanks in advance

4 12

Inbound call to webRTC failing with TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found
by hollis.rhonda＠gmail.com 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

We're seeing an issue where some webRTC clients are not receiving inbound calls. Kamailio logs show the following error: WARNING: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:3007]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found ERROR: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2086]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header ERROR: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: tm [t_fwd.c:484]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request ERROR: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: tm [t_fwd.c:1764]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches DEBUG: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: tm [t_funcs.c:358]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -2 (-2) DEBUG: {1 609669922 INVITE BW152025538120824-895739618(a)10.103.43.11}: tm [t_funcs.c:376]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation delayed It seems to be happening after the client has been connected to Kamailio for more than 24 hours. The socket connection details look correct in the external DB and in the output of ws.dump, core.tcp_list, and ul.dump. A restart of Kamailio or a reload of the webRTC client, triggering a new websocket connection, will clear the issue. However, we haven't been able to determine exactly when and why a client ends up in this state. While a client is in this state, REGISTER requests are still handled successfully, they can make outbound calls and TCP keepalives from the client are working. I'm still working on trying to debug this with GDB so I can see what the value of send_info is in https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/core/msg_translator.c#…, but I wasn't having luck with multiple child processes running, and now my client has reloaded and is working again. I've restarted Kamailio with a single child process, so when it does start failing again, I may have better luck with GDB. Any thoughts on what might be causing clients to get into this state? Whatever additional information I can provide that might help, I'm happy to share. Thanks!

2 4

secfilter (and more modules) in kamailio kemi
by bazrafshan.m.h＠protonmail.com 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

Hi guys, some modules are not shown in Kamailio Kemi's documentation, such as secfilter. Is there any way to load them and use them in Python? a way is to simulate the secfilter but it is not a general solution. (Sorry in advance for the obvious question)

3 2

[http_client] KEMI use "curl_connect_post" send http request error
by 17603019528＠163.com 16 Aug '24

16 Aug '24

ALL: Hi, here is my lua script: ``` local body = '{"ip":"172.16.4.111", "ports":[5261, 5260]}' local resp = "" local code = KSR.http_client.curl_connect_post("configapi", "", "application/json", body, resp) ``` the error is : ``` 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[0] for: curl_connect_post is str: configapi 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[1] for: curl_connect_post is str: 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[2] for: curl_connect_post is str: application/json 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[3] for: curl_connect_post is str: {"ip":"172.16.4.111", "ports":[5261, 5260]} 24(2406) DEBUG: app_lua [app_lua_api.c:1024]: sr_kemi_lua_exec_func_ex(): param[4] for: curl_connect_post is str: 24(2406) ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:429]: pv_cache_get(): invalid parameters 24(2406) ERROR: http_client [http_client.c:739]: ki_curl_connect_post(): failed to get pv spec for: ``` I know the error means: "resp" type is not right, what is the correct type ? I search google for this issue, no one knows, someone please help me. Thinks

2 2

TLS module doesn't support TLSV1
by o.atef＠fiberme.com 15 Aug '24

15 Aug '24

Hello Brothers, I've installed kamailio throw "apt install" on Debian and it's installed version: kamailio 5.6.3 (x86_64/linux). Now I've a big problem that kamailio cannot running with TLSv1 and it has to be TLSv1.2+ as tls.cfg doc said: # We do not enable anything else than TLSv1.2+ # over the public internet. Clients do not have # to present client certificates by default. How could I avoid this restriction please to enable TLSv1? Thank you,

5 5

[PHONENUM] Match with country on Lua/KSR
by João Silva 14 Aug '24

14 Aug '24

Hello everyone! The function phonenum_match_cn from module PHONENUM is not available on KSR. Is there any work around to use it on Lua config? Best regards, Joao

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users