sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

35 participants
37544 discussions

[Serusers] Help for sn2400 call
by pokerino76 02 Sep '06

02 Sep '06

I have shaped the sn2400 for the ser, succeed to make telephone calls of the net inside ,the calls phone inside working, but I do not succeed to calls phone from the outside, which it must be the configuration of ser.cfg or the other? . Thaks for help.

2 1

[Serusers] SER+Asterisk
by Siqhamo Sifo 02 Sep '06

02 Sep '06

I have ser sitting on my iptables nat box and my asterisk box on the lan . Ser does forwarding so that any requests (register,invite,ack,...) to the nat box at 5060 r sent to my asterisk box on the lan .I can register from outside to my asterisk box but there is only one way audio , reason being that when the asterisk box send a sip packet whith session description the sdp part of the sip packet is not natted . I have tried : fix_nated_contact(); fix_nated_sdp("3");

3 2

[Serusers] Presence modules and LCS
by harrygaillac-sip＠yahoo.fr 02 Sep '06

02 Sep '06

Hello, Does ser presence modules are able to work with LCS micosoft ? http://www.microsoft.com/office/livecomm/prodinfo/compare.mspx#ECD anybody is experienced with LCS to answer ? Regards Harry p4.vert.ukl.yahoo.com uncompressed/chunked Fri Sep 1 12:13:36 GMT 2006 ___________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com

1 0

[Users] RTPProxy non working?
by Federico Giannici 02 Sep '06

02 Sep '06

I'm trying to install rtpproxy. It usually works, but there are some cases that don't work. For example, when a Cisco PSTN gateway is called, RTP traffic is proxied in one direction only. I think the problem is in the handling of the reply received from the gateway: it have two "c" lines but only one is modified. Here it is the body of the original reply: v=0. o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 2199 2489 IN IP4 83.211.2.216. s=SIP Call. c=IN IP4 83.211.2.217. t=0 0. m=audio 18850 RTP/AVP 8 13 101. c=IN IP4 83.211.2.217. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-11. a=direction:passive. And here it is the body modified by rtpproxy: v=0. o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 2199 2489 IN IP4 83.211.2.216. s=SIP Call. c=IN IP4 83.211.2.217. t=0 0. m=audio 35086 RTP/AVP 8 13 101. c=IN IP4 195.120.250.49. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-11. a=direction:passive. a=nortpproxy:yes. Only the secondo "c" line contain the IP of our rtpproxy. I don't know RTP enough to understand if the problem is in rtpproxy or in the gateway. Thanks for any info. -- ___________________________________________________ __ |- giannici(a)neomedia.it |ederico Giannici http://www.neomedia.it ___________________________________________________

3 4

[Users] openser admin question..
by nick 01 Sep '06

01 Sep '06

Is an error like this normal when doing the db install? ERROR 1064 (42000): You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near 'VIEW usr_preferences_view AS SELECT id, username, domain, attribute, type AS att' at line 1 By the way, while ruby on rails might be a great development platform, it's a right pain in the behind to install.

2 5

[Users] codecs problem...
by raviprakash sunkara 01 Sep '06

01 Sep '06

Hi Users...... A doubt For me in Codec.... I'm Using openSER and RTPProxy openser didn't take the Media tranmmision , it transmmit to RTPproxy or mediaproxy. Media(voice) taking place in RTP proxy... UA1 using the G729 codec -------> openser server -------------------> UA2 using G711u for above case it will not generate the porper handshanking............ But RTP Proxy may has transmiits the media , because it has codecs in ( media proxy or rtpproxy) For a realtime producttion, UAs may having the differnet codecs. plz resolve my doubt..... -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) Hyperion Technology www.hyperion-tech.com +91-9985077535

1 0

[Users] Integration of Openser with CDRTool: Installation errors
by Alberto Pacifico 01 Sep '06

01 Sep '06

Hi all, I'm trying to install CDRTool (http://www.ag-projects.com/CDRTool.html) and some errors happened. When I try to access the CDRTool webpage, I'm able log in the page, but when I try to enter in the "call search page" some warnings appears: "Warning: main(SOAP/Client.php): failed to open stream: Arquivo ou diretÃ³rio nÃ£o encontrado in /var/www/CDRTool/rating_lib.phtml on line 4" "Fatal error: main(): Failed opening required 'SOAP/Client.php' (include_path='.:/opt/lampp/lib/php') in /var/www/CDRTool/rating_lib.phtml on line 4" In the file "rating_lib.phtml", the line 4 is: "require_once("SOAP/Client.php");" The file Client.php does not exist... But a file named "client.php" exists..and into it, theres an instruction calling "Client.php": "include("SOAP/Client.php");" An additional information is that I'm using the XAMPP Server Apache. Please, Can you help me? Thanks in advance! Alberto __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

[Users] openser+asterisk+voicemail password
by ram 01 Sep '06

01 Sep '06

Hi iam integrating with asterisk voice mail with Openser when we are creating openser views with asterisk the secret going to be Binary(0);, how can i change to numeric ? why i need is, take example If the user Phone logged in and the user have person voicemessage box he only can access his voice messages, when he dial secret If not any one can come and access voice message by dialing access number. with the config seen in the examples, person can dial *98 and hear all the messages and delete too. so for the security reason, how can i change the secret, iam trying to alter the table, but its say;s in view mode. any suggestions. Ra,

1 0

[Users] Question about voip-info.org's OpenSER/RTPProxy configuration example
by Jeremie Le Hen 01 Sep '06

01 Sep '06

Hi list, I was exploring the example configuration file in the following URL: http://voip-info.org/wiki/view/OpenSER+And+RTPProxy The following block bewilders me: % failure_route[1] { % if (isflagset(6) || isflagset(5)) { % unforce_rtp_proxy(); % } % } How a flag happens to be turned on there ? 6 is the registrar's nat_flag but no lookup() is performed. Furthermore, the tm module doesn't even depend on the registrar module. Flag 5 is set in route[2] which is obviously not called from failure_route[1]. Is there some black magic around here ? Thank you. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >

2 3

[Users] RTPProxy failover... load-balancing ?
by Jeremie Le Hen 01 Sep '06

01 Sep '06

Hi list, I was wondering whether I could use multiple rtpproxy daemons along one OpenSER instance, in order to both provide a failover mechanism as well as load-balacing. Google immediately pointed me out the following thread: http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2005-October/001071.html It happens that openser/modules/nathelper/nathelper.c contains the following comment: % 2005-02-24 Added support for using more than one rtp proxy, in which % case traffic will be distributed evenly among them. In addition, % each such proxy can be assigned a weight, which will specify % which share of the traffic should be placed to this particular % proxy. % % Introduce failover mechanism, so that if SER detects that one % of many proxies is no longer available it temporarily decreases % its weight to 0, so that no traffic will be assigned to it. % Such "disabled" proxies are periodically checked to see if they % are back to normal in which case respective weight is restored % resulting in traffic being sent to that proxy again. % % Those features can be enabled by specifying more than one "URI" % in the rtpproxy_sock parameter, optionally followed by the weight, % which if absent is assumed to be 1, for example: % % rtpproxy_sock="unix:/foo/bar=4 udp:1.2.3.4:3456=3 udp:5.6.7.8:5432=1" At first glance, I would say the aforementioned comment states that nathelper achieves both failover and weighted load-balancing. Can anyone confirm this ? Ultimately, I would like to do use the following arch : ________+----------+ /________| RTPProxy | +---------+ // +----------+ | OpenSER |_____// +---------+ /\_________+----------+ / \ ______| RTPProxy | +---------+ / \/ +----------+ | OpenSER |__/_____/\ +---------+ \ \_____+----------+ \____________| RTPProxy | +----------+ If I understand correctly how it works, this should be possible to use N OpenSER instances along with M RTProxy instances. Am I right ? Thank you. Best regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users