sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

4 participants
37456 discussions

[Users] Fwd: [Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1530057 ] Resetting flags in branch_route resets flags for ALL branchs
by Weiter Leiter 28 Jul '06

28 Jul '06

Speaking of which: there is no documentation regarding the flag set involved in transactions; there is a flag tutorial, but it doesn't tell: - that one flag set in a transaction will be set automatically in the reply, too (in the on reply route, armed in a transaction) - is this correct? - what's the flags behaviour with multiple branches (one branch sets a flag, can i see this flag from some other branch or which of the flags will i see in on failure route)? WL. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: SourceForge.net <noreply(a)sourceforge.net> Date: Jul 28, 2006 2:02 AM Subject: [Devel] [ openser-Bugs-1530057 ] Resetting flags in branch_route resets flags for ALL branchs To: noreply(a)sourceforge.net Bugs item #1530057, was opened at 2006-07-27 17:02 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1530057&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: core Group: ver 1.0.x Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Resetting flags in branch_route resets flags for ALL branchs Initial Comment: I'm using branch route to trigger mediaproxy logic per branch for UAC directed calls and i'm experiencing some strange behavior: t_relay() is called, there are two branches In both branches there are two flags set During branch_route processing of the first branch both are left intact. During branch_route processing of the second branch, both are reset (unset) The destination UAC for the first branch picks up the phone call, sending a SIP OK message This is where i'm experiencing the problem Inside of the onreply_route both flags are NOT set, even though they were unset in a different call branch This makes it impossible to properly use mediaproxy on calls with multiple branches (because some branches may not need mediaproxy which will break the ones that do in some circumstances because the "200 OK" that hits the onreply_route will not be flagged to need mediaproxying) This is using a recent (1-2 weeks ago) cvs checkout of OpenSER 1.0.0 tavis ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1530057&group_… _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

2 1

[Serusers] Send authentication challenges from SER to Radius Server in MD5
by Ricardo Carvalho 28 Jul '06

28 Jul '06

Hi, Is there a way to send authentication challenges from SER to Radius Server in MD5? How can I do it in ser.cfg? Thanks, Ricardo Carvalho.

1 0

[Users] Which one is the Best either openSER1.0.1 or openser1..1.0
by raviprakash sunkara 28 Jul '06

28 Jul '06

Hi Users, Hello to every one to openser users, Just recently OPENSER's Guy had release the version openser 1.1.0, THat is compactable to do or Not ? -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) Hyperion Technology Kondapur, Hi-tech city, Hyderabad. www.hyperion-tech.com +91-9985077535

2 1

[Serusers] Access to body SIP Message
by Nuno Ribeiro 28 Jul '06

28 Jul '06

How can I access to the body of SIP Message in the SER script? Best Regards, -- Nuno Ribeiro

2 1

[Users] outgoing proxy through VPN ?
by gary ng 28 Jul '06

28 Jul '06

Hi, I am trying to setup openser as an outgoing proxy through VPN with the following setup: 172.16.1.1 - VPN endpoint and also the machine running openser 172.16.1.2 - remote NAT router at Network A(another VPN endpoint) 192.168.1.x - sjphone client behind NAT router(Network A) I can register the client through 172.16.1.1 fine but dialing out to other SIP address like 613(a)fwd.pulver.com never go through. If I register through the public address of the machine running openser, I can make the dialing fine and can sort of having a two way communication, though it drops after 5 seconds for unknown reason. I am wondering if anyone know if the first scenario(register through VPN) is possible. Also, how to trace why the communication drops for the normal registration method. thanks for any help in advance. regards, gary __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

RE: [Users] Privacy (*67)
by Pablo Delgado 28 Jul '06

28 Jul '06

Is there a module being develop for ser that give it b2bua capabilities or is there a b2bua that integrates well with openser? Pablo Delgado Digiport Miami LLC Phone: (305) 424-0016 Web: www.digiportmiami.com Email: pablo(a)digiportmiami.com -----Original Message----- From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh@tutpro.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:01 PM To: Pablo Delgado Subject: RE: [Users] Privacy (*67) Pablo Delgado writes: > To other sip phones. then you need a b2bua that terminates the call and creates another one, where caller has been changed to anonymous. -- juha

4 4

FW: FW: FW: [Serusers] DNS SRV Mediaproxy
by Richard C. Thompson 27 Jul '06

27 Jul '06

Thanks again Samuel I saw the ultramonkey open source stuff and I will look at it. In the mean time I resolved the issue by setting up the alternate interfaces with a private IP subnet like 10.0.0.2 - 3 and now there is no routing between the public IP and private IP interfaces within the same server. I can manage the 'offline' server by ssh'ng into the on line server and then ssh'ng across the private IP link to the second server. I'll let you know how it goes, still in development. Richard C. Thompson Technology Assurance Director, CCNA Virtual Communications, LLC -----Original Message----- From: samuel [mailto:samu60@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 11:02 AM To: RThompson(a)vir2com.com Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org Subject: Re: FW: FW: [Serusers] DNS SRV Mediaproxy It's a really nice setup and quite complex, if you manage to get it working I would like to know it. You can try to take a look at heartbeat and www.ultramonkey.org because you might find useful programs to monitor both machines and have "same" IP. I don't know if it can help you but there's a parameter under proc that controls whether packets should be forwarded from interface to interface: Execute #cat sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward if it returns 1 it means that the kernel is acting as router between the two interfaces. You can set it to 0 so the two interfaces would be isolated: #echo 0 > sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward I'm afraid I can't help you more.....I don't know much more ;) Samuel. 2006/7/27, Richard C. Thompson <rthompson(a)vir2com.com>: > > Thanks Samuel > > I now have it working. I found out the proxydispatcher was using eth0 which > had the other IP address on it. The one that SER is not listening on. Once I > switched the IP addresses around it started working. BTW in order to get SER > to route calls I had to turn mhomed off. Normally I use bond0 with two > Ethernet interfaces, multihome on and use roundrobin to provide redundancy > but in this case I am trying to set up two SER servers, one as a mirror of > the other for a hot standby. I want to sync the two mysql databases using > the eth1's and have eth0 of the slave with the same IP address on it as eth0 > of the master SER. The interfaces go through a switch that I can turn the > port off so there should be no conflict, but so far the improved routing of > Linux has foiled my strategy ie Linux provides a path through the working > interface, but I'm sure I'll find a way of isolating the interfaces, mucking > around with iptables and such. > > Do you know of anyone who has made this config work? > > Thanks again for the help > Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org > [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of samuel > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 3:59 AM > To: serusers(a)iptel.org > Subject: Re: FW: [Serusers] DNS SRV Mediaproxy > > Can you get from the command line the SRV ressolution for mediaproy? > Try > #dig SRV _mediaproxy._tcp.mydomain.com > and check whether you get an answer...if not, there's some problem with DNS. > If you get the right answer, then probably the problem is in the SER > installation, remember to use mhomed=yes in the SER config file to > automatically select the right outbound socket (unless you want to do > it manually...) > I don't thing using two interfaces will affect directly how > proxydispatcher connects to DNS and ther resolved mediaproxies if *you > have the kernel routes properly configured*. Maybe you are trying to > contact a mediaproxy from an interface without connectivity to that > mediaproxy... > > Hope it helps, > Samuel. > > 2006/7/26, Richard C. Thompson <rthompson(a)vir2com.com>: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the hints! Below is additional info in response. > > > > BTW the code for both the exit ser server and the new server are the same > > except for a few things like IP address and such. > > > > > > The new ser server has two interfaces and two IP addresses, does this mess > > things up? > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > Without relevant parts of your config file it's hard to tell....it can be: > > > > *you missed to include the new ser address in the allow statment of the > > existent mediaproxies > > > > > > > > > > I included the new ser IP address in the existing mediaproxies > > > > > > *there's an allow part in the DNS which does not include the new ser as > > allowed to query for the _mediaproxy._tcp > > > > > > > > > > I don't have an allow statement in the DNS Zone file. Is this what you are > > referring to? > > > > Does the new ser server have to be listed in the zone file? > > > > > > *the domain statement in the new ser's proxydispatcher is not properly set > > > > > > I have this in the mediaproxy.ini file > > > > defaultProxy = domain://mydomain.com > > > > > > *a typo somewhere... > > > > > > > > > > why doesn't this line in mediproxy.ini work either? > > > > defaultProxy =xx.xxx.xxx.xxx:25060 # IP address of one of the mediaproxy > > servers > > > > > > > > few hints... > > sAmuEl. > > > > > > > > > > 2006/7/26, Richard C. Thompson < rthompson(a)vir2com.com>: > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > Can anyone post a hint so I can figure this out. > > > > > > > > I have a ser server using a DNS lookup for my SRV mediaproxy servers. > > Everything works fine, and has been for some time. > > > > Now I built a new ser server and want to go to the same mediaproxy servers > > but I get the following error > > > > > > > > Jul 26 09:47:36 localhost proxydispatcher[31666]: warning: none of the > > proxies for domain mydomain.com have responded > > > > Jul 26 09:47:36 localhost proxydispatcher[31666]: error: No mediaproxy > > servers found for the default domain. > > > > > > > > I have included the new ser IP in the allow config of the mediaproxy > > > > > > > > Even if I force the defaultproxy to one of the IP addresses of a > mediaproxy > > server I get the following error > > > > error: couldn't forward command to 0.0.0.0:25060 (Connection reset by > peer) > > > > > > > > Any ideas??? > > > > Could it be a version issue or maybe the python-mysqld issue, I'm not > using > > accounting. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

1 0

[Serusers] ser problem
by danieliturralde＠yahoo.com 27 Jul '06

27 Jul '06

Hello, Have a problem starting ser by using serctl start I get the following message: Starting SER : PID file /var/run/ser.pid does not exist -- SER start failed and in the messages I get: Jul 27 13:40:41 serv /usr/local/sbin/ser[16031]: Maxfwd module- initializing Jul 27 13:40:41 serv /usr/local/sbin/ser[16031]: ERROR: tcp_init: bind(7, 0x812325c, 16) on 127.0.0.1: Address already in use please help. +++ --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Get on board. You're invited to try the new Yahoo! Mail Beta.

2 1

[Users] jabber
by Javier Ramirez 27 Jul '06

27 Jul '06

why die the openser ? what is wrong ? I add this: in /etc/host 127.0.0.1 aim.jabber.server.com 127.0.0.1 msn.jabber.server.com 127.0.0.1 icq.jabber.server.com 127.0.0.1 yahoo.jabber.server.com 127.0.0.1 jabber.server.com 127.0.0.1 server.com and run: openser -f jabber2.cfg -E -dddddddddddddddd 0(4710) read 193612823 from /dev/urandom 0(4710) seeding PRNG with 1347370384 0(4710) test random number 149130666 0(4710) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.0.4 0(4710) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.0.4 Listening on udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 udp: 192.168.0.4 [192.168.0.4]:5060 tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 tcp: 192.168.0.4 [192.168.0.4]:5060 Aliases: tcp: localhost:5060 udp: localhost:5060 *: 192.168.0.4:* print - initializing textops - initializing stateless - initializing and openser die..... this is my configuration file: # # configuration for Jabber module testing # (sample config file using the module with presence support) # # $ID: daniel $ # debug=2 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes # (cmd. line: -D) log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) children=2 check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=off # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=off # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 alias="192.168.0.4" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- #modules loadmodule "modules/print/print.so" loadmodule "modules/textops/textops.so" loadmodule "modules/tm/tm.so" loadmodule "modules/maxfwd/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "modules/sl/sl.so" loadmodule "modules/mysql/mysql.so" loadmodule "modules/jabber/jabber.so" loadmodule "modules/registrar/registrar.so" loadmodule "modules/usrloc/usrloc.so" loadmodule "modules/pa/pa.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- registrar params -- modparam("registrar", "default_expires", 120) #modparam("registrar", "use_domain", 1) # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 1) modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # -- jabber params -- modparam("jabber","db_url","mysql://root@127.0.0.1/sip_jab") modparam("jabber","jaddress","jabber.server.com") modparam("jabber","jport",5222) modparam("jabber","workers",2) modparam("jabber","max_jobs",10) modparam("jabber","cache_time",200) modparam("jabber","delay_time",60) modparam("jabber","jdomain","jabber.server.com=*") modparam("jabber","aliases","4;aim.jabber.server.com;icq.jabber.server.com;msn.jabber.server.com=%;yahoo…;") route{ #if ( !mf_process_maxfwd_header("10") ) #{ # sl_send_reply("483","To Many Hops"); # drop(); #}; if (uri=~"[@:]sip\.server\.com([;:].*)*") { # for testing purposes, simply okay all REGISTERs if (method=="REGISTER") { if (t_newtran()) { save("location"); log("REGISTER received -> reply okay\n"); }; if(search("egistration")) { log("XJAB: Going ONline in Jabber network!!!\n"); if(jab_go_online()) { sl_send_reply("200", "Accepted"); } else { sl_send_reply("404","Not found"); }; } else { log("XJAB: Going OFFline in Jabber network!!!\n"); if(jab_go_offline()) { sl_send_reply("200", "Accepted"); } else { sl_send_reply("404","Not found"); }; }; break; }; if (method=="SUBSCRIBE") { if (t_newtran()) { handle_subscription("registrar"); }; break; }; if(!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404","Not found"); break; }; }; if ((search("To:.*@icq\.jabber\.server\.com")) || (search("To:.*@jabber\.server\.com")) || (search("To:.*@msn\.jabber\.server\.com")) || (search("To:.*@yahoo\.jabber\.server\.com"))) { if (! t_newtran()) { sl_reply_error(); break; }; if (method=="MESSAGE") { log("MESSAGE received -> manage it with XJAB\n"); if(search("\n:on")) { if (jab_go_online()) { sl_send_reply("200","Accepted"); }else{ sl_send_reply("404","Not found"); }; break; }; if(search("\n:off")) { if (jab_go_offline()) { sl_send_reply("200","Accepted"); }else{ sl_send_reply("404","Not found"); }; break; }; if(search("\n:join")) { if (jab_join_jconf()) { sl_send_reply("200","Accepted"); }else{ sl_send_reply("404","Not Found"); }; break; }; if(search("\n:exit")) { if (jab_exit_jconf()) { sl_send_reply("200","Accepted"); }else{ sl_send_reply("404","Not Found"); }; break; }; if (jab_send_message()) { sl_send_reply("200","Accepted"); }else{ sl_send_reply("503","Service Unavailable"); }; break; }; if (method=="SUBSCRIBE") { handle_subscription("jabber"); break; }; log("NON_Message request received for JABBER gateway->dropt!\n"); sl_send_reply("202","Accepted"); break; }; if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; #forward(uri:host,uri:port); }

4 5

[Serusers] MD5 between SER and Radius
by Ricardo Carvalho 27 Jul '06

27 Jul '06

Hi all, I'm trying to implement the MD5 digest authentication in my SER Server to authenticate with my Radius Server. What parameters should I use in ser.cfg to be able to calculate MD5 hash of the users password, to be sent to Radius Server? Is it possible? Regards, Ricardo Carvalho.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users