sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

37 participants
37547 discussions

Re: [Serusers] sending bye using sipsak [onsip.org]
by Pavel Siderov 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Thanks Paul. Now I got sipsak -f bye.txt -s sip:1.2.3.4 ** give up retransmissioning.... And the call continued :( Regards, Pavel ----- Original Message ----- From: Java Rockx To: Pavel Siderov Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 4:29 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] sending bye using sipsak [onsip.org] Your sipsak command should be sipsak -f bye.txt -s sip:1.2.3.4 Regards, Paul On 4/13/05, Pavel Siderov <pi(a)hostmates.com> wrote: Hi guys, I read the tutorial on http://onsip.org ( http://www.onsip.org/modules/xoopsfaq/index.php?cat_id=3#2 ) about sending byes but has no success with my tries: bye.txt: BYE sip:35923456@1.2.3.4 SIP/2.0 From: sip:222485@5.6.7.8;user=phone To: sip:35923456@1.2.3.4:5060;user=phone Contact: sip:222485@5.6.7.8;user=phone CSeq: 100 BYE Call-ID: 63450d656cbd4f55bec37cbfeb50a181(a)192.168.2.111 Max-Forwards: 16 Content-Length: 0 Call-ID is taken after call is has started. 1.2.3.4 is the ip of my pstn provider and 5.6.7.8 of my ser box. When I try to send it using sipsak: sipsak -f bye.txt -s 1.2.3.4 I got the following error: error: SIPURI doesn't not begin with sip Any suggestions / ideas what I'm doing wrong. Thanks, Pavel _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 2

[Serusers] Messenger 5.1 Presence
by Nigel Clarke 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Does Microsoft Messenger 5.1 have a problem with presence updates? I get updates for 4.6 clients but not for 5.1. ser.cfg is: cat ser.cfg # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.2.1 2003/07/30 16:46:18 andrei Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ #debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=yes #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) /* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=4 fork=no log_stderror=yes */ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" alias="xxx.com" alias="xxx.local" alias="sip.xxx.local" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # -- registrar parameters modparam("registrar","default_expires",1800) modparam("registrar","use_domain",0) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication # if (!www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) { # www_challenge("iptel.org", "0"); # break; # }; log(1,"request for register received"); save("location"); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } Regards, Nigel

2 1

[Serusers] sending bye using sipsak [onsip.org]
by Pavel Siderov 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Hi guys, I read the tutorial on http://onsip.org ( http://www.onsip.org/modules/xoopsfaq/index.php?cat_id=3#2 ) about sending byes but has no success with my tries: bye.txt: BYE sip:35923456@1.2.3.4 SIP/2.0 From: sip:222485@5.6.7.8;user=phone To: sip:35923456@1.2.3.4:5060;user=phone Contact: sip:222485@5.6.7.8;user=phone CSeq: 100 BYE Call-ID: 63450d656cbd4f55bec37cbfeb50a181(a)192.168.2.111 Max-Forwards: 16 Content-Length: 0 Call-ID is taken after call is has started. 1.2.3.4 is the ip of my pstn provider and 5.6.7.8 of my ser box. When I try to send it using sipsak: sipsak -f bye.txt -s 62.244.175.133 I got the following error: error: SIPURI doesn't not begin with sip Any suggestions / ideas what I'm doing wrong. Thanks, Pavel

2 1

[Serusers] Rewrite To Header
by Eric Dean 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Our VoIP service provider routes calls based upon the To field within the SIP header. While SER can easily rewrite the URI, I need to actually prepend a digit string (account code) to every outgoing call with a prefix. Does anyone know how to prefix the To field ?

3 2

RE: [Serusers] Load Balancing via UltraMonkey/ldirectord
by Matt Schulte 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Well, in our company we just lease all equipment. Yes granted we try hard to keep the cost down, we figure the equipment cost is the least of our worries. Now that doesn't mean we'd spend millions on a softswitch, we're still a small company. :-) A layer7 switch, if you compare the price to a softswitch, isn't that much money. The only reason we would consider a hardware solution though at this point is because there is literally nothing (free) software wise out there. What we're really wanting it for is Asterisk, since asterisk doesn't have the ability to do SRV lookups the only other alternative is butchering the dialplan/making a script to perform redundancy to peer with SER. With SER I was assuming use of SRV records otherwise, and for our registered users we would again use SRV records (UA compatibility pending :D) and hope t_replicate can perform adequately enough. We have an SRV bounty for Asterisk, it isn't publicly posted, if anyone is interested ;-) No one stepped up to the plate yet in the ast lists. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 11:55 PM To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Load Balancing via UltraMonkey/ldirectord So, you found the budget? Or was the pain just big enough... Let's see what we can do. It will take some time, I assume, so meanwhile... g-) Matt Schulte wrote: > Heheh, we may actually test one of those F5network switches...i f we > don't come up with a fairly painless, bugfree, and most importantly > supportable solution. :-) I cannot code therefore I would be useless, > but I can safely say learning C is on my to-do list. We may however be > willing to contribute to a bounty, at the very least I'd be more than > happy to test :D > > Matt > > -----Original Message----- > From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 5:29 AM > To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Load Balancing via UltraMonkey/ldirectord > > > :-) Yes, layer 7 switch is of course nice. But then again, you need to > make sure that you can price your services where people will buy > them... > > I wonder whether it is possible to gather some people interested in > this and get something started on the development side. AFAIK, LVS > struggles with > > other UDP services too, so a ipvs UDP content analyzer would probably > be of > interest. I looked at the source code and I think the most difficult > thing > would be to extend the ipvs framework to allow a module to peak into > the > > packet (and not only the header). I don't know what kind of > performance penalties you get either. > > I have seen several people being willing to sponsor development. We > could hire somebody at http://www.rentacoder.com/ ;-) > g-) > > Matt Schulte wrote: >> Yah I noticed the other post after I posted mine, I don't see how it >> would easily be possible to address the sticky issue. It would >> require > >> making a SIP aware proxy of sorts, which is a bit out of my >> abilities. > >> Has anyone been able to address this issue? Of course a layer7 switch >> would do wonders and eliminate the need for all this, but who has >> that > >> money laying around :D >> >> I've done a little research (google) and noticed people mentioning it >> when talking about LVS, one guy said he was going to write a module >> but posted nothing more. That would be pretty slick. >> >> Matt >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] >> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 3:04 AM >> To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> Subject: Re: [Serusers] Load Balancing via UltraMonkey/ldirectord >> >> >> If you see another thread (using the rather intuitive subject: Re: >> [Serusers] more usrloc synchronization), you will see discussions on >> using LVS in general. AFAIK, which high availability solution to use >> for LVS, is more based on your personal preferences, UltraMonkey is >> probably a safe choice. Anyway, you will need to address the >> "stickiness" issue. g-) >> >> Matt Schulte wrote: >>> Has anyone attempted to load balance SER using >>> Ultramonkey/ldirectord? >> >>> I've noticed all it does is pretty much NAT and send requests >>> accordingly, the trick I guess would be the NAT part. If the SIP >>> headers = myself, would there really be any issues? One problem I >>> can > >>> foresee is the possibility that loose routing would hit the wrong >>> server. Just wanted to ask around before I wasted time trying it out >>> for myself :-) Thanks >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Serusers mailing list >>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

Re: [Serusers] about SER+nathelper+rtpproxy
by Java Rockx 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Gcc, When dealing with NATed SIP clients you have to handle their RTP (aka, audio and/or video) in a special manner. The reason is that the two SIP UAs in the call cannot directly talk to each other. SER offers two solutions namely rtpproxy and mediaproxy. These are complete independent of each other and both have pros and cons. You can run either of these proxies on physically different servers from SER. So to answer your first question, yes this is a good way. It's not necessarily a good thing to run these media proxies on the same physical server as SER, but nonetheless it's better than no audio. To answer your question about video, the answer, AFAIK, is yes. Both rtpproxy and mediaproxy support streaming video. I've never tried video, but there should be nothing special to do. If you search the serusers mailing list archives you'll likely find other postings related to video. Regards, Paul On 4/13/05, gcc chentob <chentob_gcc(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > Hello javarockx, > Thank you very much ! I can through nat by the SER+rtpproxy, but there > are some problem about SER I want to know. could you help me. > One is :when using SER +rtpproxy and all of audio data must through the > SER, Is it a good way?Do you test the SER it can support how many ways of > audio ? > The other is : Can the SER support video? > Thank you! > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > >

1 0

[Serusers] cvs update
by Llanos Serna García-Conde 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

1 0

[Serusers] Adding aliases to user names
by Ladislav Andel 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Hi list, I'm running ser-0.9.0. I've come across a strange behaviour of adding new aliases to user names. I add an alias with serctl command, but the alias wont store in the mysql table. If I try it again I get error: <sip:joe@mydomain.com>;q=1;expires=-268 Once I restart SER I can again add the alias, but with same result, it's not saved in the table 'aliases'. Have anybody come across this issue? Thank you, Lada

3 2

[Serusers] (no subject)
by chang jenny 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Hi all, Here is my confusion about SER supporting NAT transversal. 1. With only RTPProxy, what kinds of types of NAT can SER with nathelper transverse? 2. What's the difference between MediaProxy and RTPProxy? 3. If UA supports STUN, do SER need to configure nathelper to support NAT transversal? Just because I knew STUN protocol only process a few kinds of types of NAT, I want to know what advantage it will add if I configure SER with nathelper. Thanks a lot! _________________________________________________________________ 免费下载 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/

1 0

[Serusers] Missing database creation script for serweb
by jaime wong 13 Apr '05

13 Apr '05

Hi Guys, I am a new user and can not find the script in serweb for creating the database. I have installed the .deb packages as i am running a debian box. I am very interested in trying our your system. Please send me a download location or mail it to me at ayudame(a)linuxmail.org Thanks greatly in advance -- _______________________________________________ Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox. Powered by Outblaze

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users