sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

48 participants
37555 discussions

[Serusers] Fast Busy Signals
by Rick Gocher 04 Dec '03

04 Dec '03

Hi All, I am new to SER and have only recently installed and ran the application. I have a cisco gateway which I forward to for call termination and an ATA 186 to use as my sip client. I feel the problem is with my dial plan all I ever get is fast busy signals. When I set debug to 9 I get lots of stuff in /var/log/messages although nothing about the call. I had stripped everything out of the ser.cfg routing leaving just a simple dial plan for any digits, this did not work either. In the beginning I was able to call out however the joy was short lived as I have mucked up the config so bad I can't seem to find my way back. Any help would be most appreciated Thank you Rick # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=9 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=yes # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) port=5060 children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # # $Id: pstn.cfg,v 1.2 2003/06/03 03:18:12 jiri Exp $ # # # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/uri.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/group.so" modparam("auth_db", "db_url","sql://ser:passwd@localhost/ser") modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "sql://ser:passwd@localhost/ser") # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- acc params -- modparam("acc", "log_level", 1) # that is the flag for which we will account -- don't forget to # set the same one :-) # modparam("acc", "log_flag", 1 ) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ /* ********* ROUTINE CHECKS ********************************** */ # filter too old messages if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { log("LOG: Too many hops\n"); sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if (msg:len >= max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; /* ********* RR ********************************** */ /* grant Route routing if route headers present */ if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; /* record-route INVITEs -- all subsequent requests must visit us */ if (method=="INVITE") { record_route(); }; # now check if it really is a PSTN destination which should be handled # by our gateway; if not, and the request is an invitation, drop it -- # we cannot terminate it in PSTN; relay non-INVITE requests -- it may # be for example BYEs sent by gateway to call originator if (!uri=~"sip:\+?[0-9]+@.*") { if (method=="INVITE") { sl_send_reply("403", "Call cannot be served here"); } else { # forward(uri:host, uri:port); forward(192.168.1.101, 5060); #ip of my cisco gateway }; break; }; # account completed transactions via syslog setflag(1); # free call destinations ... no authentication needed if ( is_user_in("Request-URI", "free-pstn") /* free destinations */ | uri=~"sip:[79][0-9][0-9][0-9]@.*" /* local PBX */ | uri=~"sip:98[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]") { log("free call"); } else if (src_ip==192.168.1.101) { # our gateway doesn't support digest authentication; # verify that a request is coming from it by source # address log("gateway-originated request"); } else { # in all other cases, we need to check the request against # access control lists; first of all, verify request # originator's identity if (!proxy_authorize( "gateway" /* realm */, "subscriber" /* table name */)) { proxy_challenge( "gateway" /* realm */, "0" /* no qop */ ); break; }; # authorize only for INVITEs -- RR/Contact may result in weird # things showing up in d-uri that would break our logic; our # major concern is INVITE which causes PSTN costs if (method=="INVITE") { # does the authenticated user have a permission for local # calls (destinations beginning with a single zero)? # (i.e., is he in the "local" group?) if (uri=~"sip:0[1-9][0-9]+@.*") { if (!is_user_in("credentials", "local")) { sl_send_reply("403", "No permission for local calls"); break; }; # the same for long-distance (destinations begin with two zeros") } else if (uri=~"sip:00[1-9][0-9]+@.*") { if (!is_user_in("credentials", "ld")) { sl_send_reply("403", " no permission for LD "); break; }; # the same for international calls (three zeros) } else if (uri=~"sip:000[1-9][0-9]+@.*") { if (!is_user_in("credentials", "int")) { sl_send_reply("403", "International permissions needed"); break; }; # everything else (e.g., interplanetary calls) is denied } else { sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden"); break; }; }; # INVITE to authorized PSTN }; # authorized PSTN # if you have passed through all the checks, let your call go to GW! rewritehostport("192.168.1.101:5060"); # forward the request now if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); break; }; if (uri=~"^sip:[0-9]*@.*") { log("Forwarding to PSTN\n"); t_relay_to_udp ("192.168.1.101","5060"); # IP address of my cisco gateway break; }; }

2 1

[Serusers] Windows Messenger 5.0
by Morris, Scott 04 Dec '03

04 Dec '03

I have 0.8.1 running on Suse 9.0. It works great with my Zultys phone, Polycom IP 600, and the Helmsen agent. When I try to use Windows Messenger 5.0 I have a slight problem. UserA signs in. UserB signs in, and sees that UserA is online, and there changes the UserA in the contact list on ONLINE. But UserB never shows as ONLINE on UserA's desktop. So UserA can't call UserB. The update never goes to UserA's desktop. What am I missing here? Scott Morris

2 1

RE: [Serusers] help with the setup of Ser.
by Chris Monahan 04 Dec '03

04 Dec '03

well its doing something different now -- when I dial a call, it adds it to the location table in mysql. on the phone, it doesn't ring or anything, it just brings me right back to the WFC screen.... Any ideas? -----Original Message----- From: Kannaiyan Natesan [mailto:nkans@lycos.co.uk] Sent: Wed 12/3/2003 3:29 PM To: Chris Monahan; serusers(a)iptel.org Cc: Subject: Re: [Serusers] help with the setup of Ser. Sorry. that should be if( method =="REGISTER") { save("location"); }; Kannaiyan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kannaiyan Natesan" <nkans(a)lycos.co.uk> To: "Chris Monahan" <chris(a)loudpacket.com>; <serusers(a)iptel.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:25 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] help with the setup of Ser. > Remove the "if( uri==myself )" condition completely & add the following > > if( method == INVITE) { > save("location"); > }; > > this should register all the phones coming to your server. and you should > able to call them without any problems. > > Kannaiyan > > http://www.speak2world.com -- Call with your own domain !!! > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Monahan" <chris(a)loudpacket.com> > To: <serusers(a)iptel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:14 PM > Subject: [Serusers] help with the setup of Ser. > > > > Hello people... > > > > I have been working on Ser all day. I have read every manual possible, and > am about to lose it! My setup is pretty simple. Ser is running on > 192.168.3.1... it is a dhcp server, tftp server, and ser server. > > > > I have 2 Cisco IP Phones (7960)... > > > > They both connect to 192.168.3.1 just fine. They download the latest rom, > they have the appropriate lines in the top right of the screen. > > > > Everything seems fine, until I attempt to make a call. > > > > Running serctl monitor shows me that everytime a call is placed, it gets > an error 404 - Not Found. I was getting error 483 earlier, but I read the > documentation some more and fixed it. > > > > I have setup locations for the two users (sip:chris@192.168.3.1) and > (sip:allan@192.168.3.1), and aliases as well.. > > > > Still, I cannot make a call between the two phones. Everytime I try, I get > a busy tone on the phone, and error 404... > > > > Can anyone please help? > > > > Thanks! > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > Serusers(a)iptel.org > > http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > Serusers(a)iptel.org > http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

2 1

[Serusers] help with the setup of Ser.
by Chris Monahan 04 Dec '03

04 Dec '03

Hello people... I have been working on Ser all day. I have read every manual possible, and am about to lose it! My setup is pretty simple. Ser is running on 192.168.3.1... it is a dhcp server, tftp server, and ser server. I have 2 Cisco IP Phones (7960)... They both connect to 192.168.3.1 just fine. They download the latest rom, they have the appropriate lines in the top right of the screen. Everything seems fine, until I attempt to make a call. Running serctl monitor shows me that everytime a call is placed, it gets an error 404 - Not Found. I was getting error 483 earlier, but I read the documentation some more and fixed it. I have setup locations for the two users (sip:chris@192.168.3.1) and (sip:allan@192.168.3.1), and aliases as well.. Still, I cannot make a call between the two phones. Everytime I try, I get a busy tone on the phone, and error 404... Can anyone please help? Thanks!

3 3

RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
by Darren Sessions 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

Do I need to do anything special with rtpproxy? -----Original Message----- From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:44 PM To: Darren Sessions Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy Take a loot at the nathelper_rtp.cfg file under the modules/nathelper directory. It contains the basics of what you need. The funcionality is basically determined by these lines: if (method=="INVITE") { record_route(); if (isflagset(1)) { # ATA ? force_rtp_proxy(); }; /* set up reply processing */ t_on_reply("1"); }; . . . onreply_route[1] { if (status=~"1[0-9][0-9]" && search("Server: Cisco ATA.*")) fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); } ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:20 PM Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > Hmmm.. You wouldn't by chance have a "scrubbed" version of your > configuration file I could look at would you? It would be most helpful. > > Thanks for everything, > > - Darren > > -----Original Message----- > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:18 PM > To: Darren Sessions > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server. The ser.cfg must be > configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed. > > I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the > > nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to > the > > primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)? Does > > the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the > > signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box? > > > > Thanks a ton for all the help! > > > > - Darren > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM > > To: Darren Sessions > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on > our > > production servers and it has never crashed > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> > > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now. > > > > > > I'll let you know how it goes.. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM > > > To: Darren Sessions > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > > > Darren, > > > > > > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put > > some > > > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you have > > better > > > luck please let us all know. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andres. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > > > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> > > > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM > > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > > > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with > > Solaris > > > 9. > > > > > > > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all > > > > cc -o main.o -c main.c > > > > In file included from main.c:45: > > > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory > > > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory > > > > main.c: In function `main': > > > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len' > > > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1 > > > > > > > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me. > > > > > > > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the > > > Makefile.gnu > > > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris". > > > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated! :) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > - Darren > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul > > > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM > > > > To: Darren Sessions > > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for > > Nathelper > > > > and > > > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards? > > > > > > > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they > must > > > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy). > > > > > > > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to > avoid > > > > packets with different source address than the destination of the > > intial > > > > packet going back to the nat). > > > > > > > > >then > > > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and > > the > > > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets? > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Serusers mailing list > > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
by Darren Sessions 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

Great!! Thanks again!! -----Original Message----- From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:44 PM To: Darren Sessions Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy Take a loot at the nathelper_rtp.cfg file under the modules/nathelper directory. It contains the basics of what you need. The funcionality is basically determined by these lines: if (method=="INVITE") { record_route(); if (isflagset(1)) { # ATA ? force_rtp_proxy(); }; /* set up reply processing */ t_on_reply("1"); }; . . . onreply_route[1] { if (status=~"1[0-9][0-9]" && search("Server: Cisco ATA.*")) fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); } ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:20 PM Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > Hmmm.. You wouldn't by chance have a "scrubbed" version of your > configuration file I could look at would you? It would be most helpful. > > Thanks for everything, > > - Darren > > -----Original Message----- > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:18 PM > To: Darren Sessions > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server. The ser.cfg must be > configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed. > > I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the > > nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to > the > > primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)? Does > > the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the > > signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box? > > > > Thanks a ton for all the help! > > > > - Darren > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM > > To: Darren Sessions > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on > our > > production servers and it has never crashed > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> > > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now. > > > > > > I'll let you know how it goes.. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM > > > To: Darren Sessions > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > > > Darren, > > > > > > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put > > some > > > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you have > > better > > > luck please let us all know. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Andres. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > > > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> > > > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM > > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > > > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with > > Solaris > > > 9. > > > > > > > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all > > > > cc -o main.o -c main.c > > > > In file included from main.c:45: > > > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory > > > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory > > > > main.c: In function `main': > > > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len' > > > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1 > > > > > > > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me. > > > > > > > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the > > > Makefile.gnu > > > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris". > > > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated! :) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > - Darren > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul > > > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM > > > > To: Darren Sessions > > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > > > wrote: > > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for > > Nathelper > > > > and > > > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards? > > > > > > > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they > must > > > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy). > > > > > > > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to > avoid > > > > packets with different source address than the destination of the > > intial > > > > packet going back to the nat). > > > > > > > > >then > > > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and > > the > > > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets? > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Serusers mailing list > > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
by Darren Sessions 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

Hmmm.. You wouldn't by chance have a "scrubbed" version of your configuration file I could look at would you? It would be most helpful. Thanks for everything, - Darren -----Original Message----- From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:18 PM To: Darren Sessions Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy We have nathelper/rtpproxy/SER all on the same server. The ser.cfg must be configured to invoke the nathelper/rtproxy functions as needed. I cannot comment on SEMS since we don't use it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:11 PM Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the > nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to the > primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)? Does > the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the > signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box? > > Thanks a ton for all the help! > > - Darren > > -----Original Message----- > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM > To: Darren Sessions > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on our > production servers and it has never crashed > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now. > > > > I'll let you know how it goes.. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM > > To: Darren Sessions > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > Darren, > > > > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put > some > > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you have > better > > luck please let us all know. > > > > Thanks, > > Andres. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> > > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM > > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with > Solaris > > 9. > > > > > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all > > > cc -o main.o -c main.c > > > In file included from main.c:45: > > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory > > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory > > > main.c: In function `main': > > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len' > > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1 > > > > > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me. > > > > > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the > > Makefile.gnu > > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris". > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated! :) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > - Darren > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul > > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de] > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM > > > To: Darren Sessions > > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > > > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > > wrote: > > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for > Nathelper > > > and > > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards? > > > > > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they must > > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy). > > > > > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to avoid > > > packets with different source address than the destination of the > intial > > > packet going back to the nat). > > > > > > >then > > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and > the > > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets? > > > > > > > > > Andrei > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > >

2 1

[Serusers] SERWeb for 0.8.12
by Aaron Daubman 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

Hi, I'm just getting started with SER and SERWeb on a FreeBSD 5.1 system. The SER install went smoothly (compiled from source) and the database seemed to go in fine. Once SER was in place I went looking for serweb but there wasn't a package for 'latest' yet (that I could find). I tried the serweb package from 0.8.11 and ran into some problems (I just grabbed serweb from CVS and it seems to be the same). 1) in config.php (and a few other places I'm now forgetting) the user pages path is set (or hard-coded) to /user/, however the included directory is user_interface/ (e.g. $this->user_pages_path = $this->root_path."user/";, as well as the reg and confirmation URLs) That was easy enough to fix, however it was somewhat concerning. 2) After submitting a request for an account and following the emailed URL, I've consistently gotten errors. They seem to point at the database, but reinit'ing it did not help. The errors were: - error in SQL query, line: 43 (from the confirmation.php page) - Something to do with aliases (cannot currently generate the error) like use save("aliases") or update("aliases) in config script before using. The second error seems to be a problem, as the account is added, but without the requested phone number aliased. (there don't seem to be any aliases). 3) I consistently get a 404 not found when trying to IM any of the users on the system - is this also related to the lack of/problem with aliases? Aside from these errors, I was able to register with two Cisco 7960s using the requested and confirmed accounts (not yet able to test calling, although without the aliases I assume it would fail) as well as modify account parameters from serweb. Is there a specific release of serweb that should be used with 0.8.12, or one that is "least buggy"? Thank you, ~Aaron

3 2

RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy
by Darren Sessions 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

My next questions is then, what configuration changes do I make to the nathelper server to make it forward requests made from the endpoints to the primary ser box? and how does voicemail come into play (using sems)? Does the nathelper server "know" about all the servers or simply does the signaling traffic and rtp traffic get routed through the nathelper box? Thanks a ton for all the help! - Darren -----Original Message----- From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:46 AM To: Darren Sessions Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy It works great on RedHat. We have it running now for about 4 months on our production servers and it has never crashed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> To: "TeleSIP" <ricvil(a)telesip.net> Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > I'm starting over on a Redhat Linux box right now. > > I'll let you know how it goes.. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: TeleSIP [mailto:ricvil@telesip.net] > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:15 AM > To: Darren Sessions > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > Darren, > > 3 months ago I tried to get this to work on Solaris 8. Maxim also put some > time into it but I was never able to get it to compile. If you have better > luck please let us all know. > > Thanks, > Andres. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Darren Sessions" <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > To: "Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul" <pelinescu-onciul(a)fokus.fraunhofer.de> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:40 AM > Subject: RE: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > I am having problems compiling rtpproxy on a Sun Netra 1400t with Solaris > 9. > > > > root:/export/home/rtpproxy # make all > > cc -o main.o -c main.c > > In file included from main.c:45: > > myqueue.h:40:23: sys/cdefs.h: No such file or directory > > main.c:51:17: err.h: No such file or directory > > main.c: In function `main': > > main.c:486: structure has no member named `sun_len' > > make: *** [main.o] Error 1 > > > > I am new to this stuff, so everyone will have to bear with me. > > > > I can't seem to find cdefs.h or err.h. I did however throw the > Makefile.gnu > > up as Makefile and uncommented the section labeled "for Solaris". > > > > Any help would be appreciated! :) > > > > Thanks, > > > > - Darren > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul > > [mailto:pelinescu-onciul@fokus.fraunhofer.de] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:36 PM > > To: Darren Sessions > > Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] NatHelper & Portaone RTP Proxy > > > > > > On Dec 02, 2003 at 17:10, Darren Sessions <dsessions(a)ionosphere.net> > wrote: > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but is the typical setup for Nathelper > > and > > > Portaone RTP proxy work on seperate servers with dual network cards? > > > > No. nathelper use unix sockets to communicate with rtprpoxy so they must > > be located on the same box (ser runing nathelper and rtproxy). > > > > Also it is better to run/configure them on only one interface (to avoid > > packets with different source address than the destination of the intial > > packet going back to the nat). > > > > >then > > > talking to another SER box doing registrations and call routing? and the > > > Portaone RTP taking the voice packets? > > > > > > Andrei > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > >

2 1

[Serusers] radiusclient new generation
by Maxim Sobolev 03 Dec '03

03 Dec '03

Folks, I've registered new radiusclient-ng project on BerliOS. This project is based on the existing radiusclient (approval is pending, first drop of code and project page should be available tomorrow). My goal is to merge in SIP-related changes from the SER, and also incorporate some other improvements that Porta made locally. Unfortunately current maintainer of the radiusclient doesn't respond to e-mail inquiries, which is the reason for the fork. Following is incomplete list of features to be implemented in the next revision of radiusclient library: - OOB support for SIP digest VSA attributes; - ability to bind library to some specific IP address, which is useful when there is a need to run several SER copies on the same machine but on different IP addresses; - full re-entrancy; - python bindings. If somebody has any other features in mind or is willing to help with the work please let me know. Thanks! -Maxim

3 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users