hi!
is serweb intended to just send IM one-way? i configured everything and
noticed that i can only send messages from a web-client (via serweb) to
a sip softphone, but not the other way around.
i noticed that this is due to the fact that when a user logs on to
serweb, it does not put anything in the location table in ser db. so if
a message was sent intended for that user, the sender receives 404 not
found (due to failure in lookup()).
what i am thinking as a workaround is to manipulate the php files in
serweb to insert the user into the 'location' table via fifo, the method
though crude might just work...
my problem is, before i could try to do the workaround is whether serweb
would accept the message if it indeed received one on port 5060? would
it? or should the proxy send the message through another port like 80?
I'm not aware of an affordable stress tools which covers both media
and signaling.
-Jiri
At 03:50 PM 4/24/2003, Alejandro Olchik wrote:
>I would like to start multiple simultaneous calls
>(let's say around 30), and keep calls active to
>test concurrency.
>
>Any suggestion how can I do that without requiring
>expensive software for that?
>
>I have enough ports to terminate the calls using
>G729 but I don't know what to use for originate them.
>
>Regards,
>Alejandro
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Hi all,
I put following config in the main routing-block for forwarding INVITE-msg
to pstn-gatway:
...
route{
...
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
};
# forward message to PSTN Gateway
if (uri=~"^sip:[0-9]*@"){
log(5, "Forward to pstn \n");
forward("10.20.0.6");
break;
};
}
However, SER doesn't do it and sends a reply "404 not found" back instead.
Is it the correct position to put the function "forward()" there?
By the way, ser also doesn't write log message to syslog. Following is my
syslog.conf, is anything wrong in the syslog.conf?
#ident "@(#)syslog.conf 1.5 98/12/14 SMI" /* SunOS 5.0 */
#
# Copyright (c) 1991-1998 by Sun Microsystems, Inc.
# All rights reserved.
#
# syslog configuration file.
#
# This file is processed by m4 so be careful to quote (`') names
# that match m4 reserved words. Also, within ifdef's, arguments
# containing commas must be quoted.
#
*.debug;*.notice;*.info;*.crit;*.alert /var/log/debug
*.err;kern.notice;auth.notice /dev/sysmsg
*.err;kern.debug;daemon.notice;mail.crit /var/adm/messages
*.alert;kern.err;daemon.err operator
*.alert root
*.emerg *
# if a non-loghost machine chooses to have authentication messages
# sent to the loghost machine, un-comment out the following line:
#auth.notice ifdef(`LOGHOST', /var/log/authlog, @loghost)
mail.debug ifdef(`LOGHOST', /var/log/syslog, @loghost)
#
# non-loghost machines will use the following lines to cause "user"
# log messages to be logged locally.
#
user.err /dev/sysmsg
user.err /var/adm/messages
user.alert `root, operator'
user.emerg *
auth.info /var/adm/messages
local6.debug /var/adm/imapd.log
auth.debug /var/adm/auth.log
Thanks,
Yang
I would like to start multiple simultaneous calls
(let's say around 30), and keep calls active to
test concurrency.
Any suggestion how can I do that without requiring
expensive software for that?
I have enough ports to terminate the calls using
G729 but I don't know what to use for originate them.
Regards,
Alejandro
Hi ,
In Ser's Makefile.defs , originally , it define PKG_MALLOC , SHM_MEM ,
SHM_MMAP ,for shared memory,
and I would like to marked it , cause i want to try let it not use shared
memory
(and modified ser.cfg let it just produce one main parent process )
I tried marked those three definitions , but it has error when compile ,
it seems some modules still need functions which only exist when those three
definitions is defined,
do those three definitions can't marked?
or in ser , it can't work without using shared memory , can't mark those
definition?
Thanks ,
Jimmy
On 23-04 19:35, Dinesh wrote:
>
> Yes I do have "fork-yes"
>
> In cfg
>
> Should I change it to no?
No. Send us your start-up script. And please reply to
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org, not directly to me.
Jan.
Hi all,
I want to use a cisco 2600 as sip2pstn gateway. In csico dokumentations and
in postings of other people it seems that the cisco 2600 works with a PRI
ISDN interface. Does anybody konw if it also works with BRI interface? I
don't find a way to define "voice-port" on the router just with BRI
interface. Has anybody here successfully tested this?
Many thanks
Yang
