sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37517 discussions

play music while processing a http request
by 赵国杰 16 Nov '17

16 Nov '17

Hello guys, I have the following senario: ua1 calls ua2. when the INVITE reaches the kamailio, before foward to ua2, kamailio has to do a http request using “http_async_query”. However, the http request can take a really long time. I want the kamailio start playing music when the http request is sent and stop the music when the http response is received. My config file is like this: request_route { ... t_newtran(); http_async_query("url here", "HTTP_REPLY"); } route[HTTP_REPLY] { ... # forward the invite to ua2 } how do i complete the config? Thanks

2 3

Dmq_usrloc
by sofos koko 14 Nov '17

14 Nov '17

Hi ...i would like to connect two kamailio in diffwrent network so i can get call from one to another is any kamailio.cfg example to help me do it!

1 0

topos and topos_redis : error log -> ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store
by Abdoul Osséni 14 Nov '17

14 Nov '17

hello, After activated redis backend for topos module, I have some error logs. Can you help me to understand these logs? # kamailio -V version: kamailio 5.1.0-rc0 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 14:18:08 Nov 14 2017 with gcc 4.9.2 Nov 14 15:15:51 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4805]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:51 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4805]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:51 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4807]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:51 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4807]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:51 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4808]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:51 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4808]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:51 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4808]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:51 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4808]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:52 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4805]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:52 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4805]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:52 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4806]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:52 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4806]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:52 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4807]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:52 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4807]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:52 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4807]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:52 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4807]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:53 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4806]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:53 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4806]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Nov 14 15:15:53 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4808]: INFO: topos_redis [topos_redis_storage.c:163]: tps_redis_insert_dialog(): no uuid for this message Nov 14 15:15:53 sd-110402 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[4808]: ERROR: topos [tps_storage.c:394]: tps_storage_record(): failed to store Abdoul OSSENI

1 0

AVPOPS: is_avp_set/avp_check "name" parameter as variable.
by Asgaroth 14 Nov '17

14 Nov '17

Hi All, I was having a read of the AVP module documentation and I see mentioned that in future releases of kamailio that the AVP module may become deprecated in favour of using AVPOPS module. To this end, I started looking to switch some of AVP functions over to AVPOPS functions when I cam across an issue where I cannot have the name parameter of the avp to check a variable. I have some attributes defined for a domain which I load up using lookup_domain, one of these attributes is a dispatcher setid based on the request method being processed. So, with AVP I can do something like the following to see if it is set: if ( attr_exists( $_s(dm_ds_setid_$rm) ) ) The above works as expected, but if I try using something equivelent using avpops functions, something like: if ( is_avp_set("$avp(s:$_s(dm_ds_setid_$rm))") ) or if ( is_avp_set("$avp(s:dm_ds_setid_$rm)") ) or if ( is_avp_set("$avp($_s(dm_ds_setid_$rm))") ) or if ( is_avp_set("$avp(dm_ds_setid_$rm)") ) Then it fails the check even though the avp is set correctly, there are no errors in the logs so it all appears to be okay. Likewise, when checking with the following AVP function, it works: if ( attr_equals("$_s(dm_ds_setid_$rm)", "100") ) But, if I try with AVPOPS function, it fails (I'm guessing its bacause the avp cannot be found) if ( avp_check("$avp(s:$_s(dm_ds_setid_$rm))", "100") ) or if ( avp_check("$avp(s:dm_ds_setid_$rm)", "100") ) or if ( avp_check("$avp($_s(dm_ds_setid_$rm))", "100") ) or if ( avp_check("$avp(dm_ds_setid_$rm", "100") ) Are the AVPOPS functions able to take nested variables like the above? Is this a bug or am I using them incorrectly? I'm currently trying this out on kamailio v5.0.4. Any thoughts on the issue would be appreciated. Thanks

2 2

max_contacts does not work as expected
by Gholamreza Sabery 14 Nov '17

14 Nov '17

I have a Kamailio server that has: modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 2) But recently I noticed some users have more than two records in the location table. For example one of the users has three different records with nearly the same information. The records are as follows. Is this behavior normal? (I am using Kamailio 4XX). *************************** 1. row *************************** id: 171296745 ruid: uloc-2c69-59db6c73-7ca-132d92 username: 999999999999 domain: NULL contact: sip:999999999999@5.106.35.18:10362 received: sip:5.106.35.18:10361 path: NULL expires: 2017-11-14 08:45:50 q: -1.00 callid: XpCnmaAhRF cseq: 43 last_modified: 2017-11-14 08:44:50 flags: 0 cflags: 64 user_agent: android_1.1.0_samsung_SM-E500H_7b271714c08b942aa821fc756cdd2e890a37069e/1.1.0 (belle-sip/1.4.2) socket: udp:192.168.103.21:5060 methods: NULL instance: <urn:uuid:8369ef6e-202b-4844-8928-492a7678c269> reg_id: 0 server_id: 11369 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 14 *************************** 2. row *************************** id: 171296746 ruid: uloc-2c69-59db6c73-7f2-eb5d92 username: 999999999999 domain: NULL contact: sip:999999999999@5.106.35.18:10362 received: sip:5.106.35.18:10361 path: NULL expires: 2017-11-14 08:45:50 q: -1.00 callid: BzMKuyJN8C cseq: 50 last_modified: 2017-11-14 08:44:50 flags: 0 cflags: 64 user_agent: android_1.1.0_samsung_SM-E500H_7b271714c08b942aa821fc756cdd2e890a37069e/1.1.0 (belle-sip/1.4.2) socket: udp:192.168.103.21:5060 methods: NULL instance: <urn:uuid:8369ef6e-202b-4844-8928-492a7678c269> reg_id: 0 server_id: 11369 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 23 *************************** 3. row *************************** id: 171296747 ruid: uloc-2c69-59db6c73-80f-541d92 username: 999999999999 domain: NULL contact: sip:999999999999@5.106.35.18:10362 received: sip:5.106.35.18:10361 path: NULL expires: 2017-11-14 08:45:50 q: -1.00 callid: 3p9P4PgZSv cseq: 51 last_modified: 2017-11-14 08:44:50 flags: 0 cflags: 64 user_agent: android_1.1.0_samsung_SM-E500H_7b271714c08b942aa821fc756cdd2e890a37069e/1.1.0 (belle-sip/1.4.2) socket: udp:192.168.103.21:5060 methods: NULL instance: <urn:uuid:8369ef6e-202b-4844-8928-492a7678c269> reg_id: 0 server_id: 11369 connection_id: -1 keepalive: 1 partition: 15

1 0

Load Gateway according hostname
by Ashutosh chaubey 13 Nov '17

13 Nov '17

Hi, I am trying to find a way to load a specific gateway but instead of lcr_id i want it load gateways according to the hostname. I am passing Hostname as a header to kamailio so its easy to access that but unabale to load gateways according to it. Any help? Regards, Ashutosh Chaubey

1 0

using bcrypt passwd hashing
by Walter Martín Villalba 13 Nov '17

13 Nov '17

Hello, I did some searches online and talked to some colleagues and it seems Kamailio only supports the traditional HTTP digest authentication, which uses MD5. I would like to know if any of you has been successful in using bcrypt/scrypt/pbkdf2 passwd hashing, instead of MD5, which has been deemed as obsolete and insecure a long time ago. Perhaps you've written your own auth module, or just modified the config script to call some other credential checking routine using a custom python/perl script (I'm thinking of doing the latter, of nothing better is available). If any of you have done something like this, using bcrypt or any other current and secure hashing algorithm, I would appreciate some guidance. If you haven't, aren't you concerned about storing MD5 password hashes in your database? Note: if I can't find a good answer using this list, I will try the developer's list next. Thanks in advance, Martín.

4 5

Kamailio issue
by bazou2 bazou2 13 Nov '17

13 Nov '17

Hello, I have a kamailio version 4.4 with an Asterisk 13 ... and i need to make a call from a sip phone app.(i have a user subscribed on the kamailio to be used on the sip phone app). The weird thing that first time, the call works (I can see the sip messages working fine between the app kamailio and asterisk) but when i try again it doesn't work. SIP messages show that the kamailio and Asterisk keep send trying request between them and the loop of these kind of messages doesn't end.. I need to know if i am missing something in the configuration file of the kamailio or what? Regards Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook>

2 2

Development open in master branch (to be v5.2.x)
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 Nov '17

12 Nov '17

Hello, git branch 5.1 was just created (to host the release series v5.1.x), therefore new features can now be pushed again in master branch. They will be part of the next future release, likely to be numbered 5.2.x. Any fixes that affect existing code in branches 5.1 or older version have to be backported - push first to master and then cherry pick -- see the contributing guidelines at: - https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/devel/git-commit-guidelines#backporting_commi… Many thanks to all contributors so far! Testing of branch 5.1 and giving feedback for it is very appreciated! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Branch 5.1 created
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 12 Nov '17

12 Nov '17

Hello, the GIT branch 5.1 has just been created, it will host the release series 5.1.x. To get this branch from GIT, you can use: git clone https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio.git kamailio cd kamailio git checkout -b 5.1 origin/5.1 Hopefully in two-three weeks time frame the full release of 5.1.0 will be out. >From now on, any corresponding fix has to be pushed first to master branch and then cherry-picked to branch 5.1. No new features can get in branch 5.1. Enhancements to documentation or helping tools, as well as kemi exports are still allowed. If you are not sure about doing or not a backport, ask on sr-dev mailing list. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users