sr-users

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

42 participants
37518 discussions

UACREG - answering to 401 on invite
by Jean Cérien 26 Sep '17

26 Sep '17

Hello I'm using Kamailio 5.0.1 With the UACREG module, I am registering to a remote provider. Register goes out, 401 back, Register goes out with nonce & co, OK Later, when I send an invite, the provider issues an 401 Unauthorized. I guess it expects me to resubmit an INVITE with the authentication data, but I dont see how to do that. Any help would be appreciated ! J.

2 6

How to change SDP in 200 Ok reply
by Jurijs Ivolga 26 Sep '17

26 Sep '17

Hi, I have difficult times to edit SDP in 200 ok replies, I need to change RTP/SAVPF to UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF in all 200 Ok. Here is code snippet: onreply_route { if ( $rm == "INVITE" && status=="200") { if (search_body("a=fingerprint")) { if (search_body(" RTP/SAVPF ")) { xlog("L_INFO","200 OK DTLS call.\n"); replace_body_all(" RTP/SAVPF "," UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF "); } } } } What I'm doing wrong? I think my code is executed against SDP of Invite, but not 200 OK. Jurijs

2 2

Best variant to share variables between two dialogs?
by Kristijan Vrban 26 Sep '17

26 Sep '17

Hi, based on Daniels example from: http://blog.miconda.eu/2010/01/best-of-new-in-kamailio-300-19-htable.html ... modparam("htable", "htable", "acalls=>size=8;") ... route { ... if(is_method("INVITE") && !has_totag()) { # a new call if($shtcv(ht=>^$fU$)>=3) { send_reply("403", "limit exceeded"); exit; } $sht(acalls=>$ci) = $fU; t_on_failure("NEW_INVITE"); } if(is_method("BYE")) { $sht(acalls=>$ci) = $null; } ... } failure_route[NEW_INVITE] { $sht(acalls=>$ci) = $null; } I use this htable variant to share data between two dialogs (store Contact from one dialog, and re-write other R-URI with it). Referenced by call-id: ... $avp(referenceID) = $ci + "-" + $avp(direction); $sht(a=>$avp(referenceID)) = $ct; ... ... $avp(referenceID) = $ci + "-" + $avp(direction); avp(newru) = $sht(a=>$avp(referenceID)); avp_subst("$avp(newru)", "/(<)(.*)(>)/\2/"); xlog("L_NOTICE", ">>>>>>>> ReWrite ru with:$avp(newru)\n"); $ru = $avp(newru); ... Is this the best method to share data between two dialogs? Because you have to take care yourself with failure_route and so on, to free (set back to $null) them. Or is there a more elegant way for that task? Best Kristijan

1 0

Send 407 for Invite
by Logeshwaran G 26 Sep '17

26 Sep '17

Hi, How to send the 407 proxy authentication for Invite message? Input Please Thanks & Kind Regards, *Logeshwaran G* *"Be Hungry, Stay Foolish"*

3 3

Memory allocation issue
by Logeshwaran G 26 Sep '17

26 Sep '17

Hi, I am having the below Error while executing the kamailio cfg file. Before an hour it executed successfully, There is no changes in cfg. loading modules under config path: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/ 0(27575) : <core> [core/mem/shm.c:105]: shm_getmem(): could not attach shared memory segment: Cannot allocate memory 0(27575) : <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:1203]: qm_malloc_init_shm_manager(): could not initialize qm shm memory pool Too much qm shm memory demanded: 67108864 bytes 0(27575) CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3414]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/config/kamailio_final.cfg, line 302, column 39: Can't initialize shared memory ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) Input please? Thanks & Kind Regards, *Logeshwaran G* *"Be Hungry, Stay Foolish"*

1 0

Docker image
by Sergey Safarov 25 Sep '17

25 Sep '17

Hello guys Yes i packaged kamailio to docker container <https://hub.docker.com/r/safarov/kamailio3/>. This container is ready to run kamailio in docker environment. Could you make review of this. Dockerfiles you can review at https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/tree/master/pkg/kamailio/alpine_docker Build process logs you can review at https://hub.docker.com/r/safarov/kamailio3/builds/bl9rv6ygeubwnydh4an2tuc/ Sergey

3 3

Astricon 2017
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 25 Sep '17

25 Sep '17

Hello, Kamailio will be present at Astricon 2017 having a stand in the expo area (Orlando, FL, during October 3-5 -- more details at www.astricon.net). Should you participate at the event and have flyers/other materials with products/solutions/services that use Kamailio or giveaways, you are welcome to join the booth or just drop them there, we are more than happy to promote and spread them. Also, you are very welcome to just stop by and have a chat. Besides the activity in the exhibition area, I and Fred Posner will have presentations about using Kamailio together with Asterisk or other VoIP applications. Be sure you do not miss them, the agenda is available at: - http://www.asterisk.org/community/astricon-user-conference/schedule Expect a consistent group from Kamailio community, it's a great event to be at! Looking forward to meeting many of you next week in Orlando! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] SIP ping, sockets and multi homed
by Patrick Wakano 25 Sep '17

25 Sep '17

Hello list, After deep investigation I found out that the issue is happening because of the mechanism Kamailio uses to find the most appropriate socket combined with the virtual IP usage.... For socket selection, Kamailio first asks Linux which would be the routing for a certain destination, then matches this outcome with the list of listened sockets. By default Linux will always return the local IP instead of the virtual one. So if Kamailio only binds to the virtual IP, the Linux's returned IP won't match our socket list and then the socket selection fails.... So currently Kamailio active/stand-by HA setup with virtual IP in a multi-homed environment does not work properly... We can overcome this by listening to all addresses, but then Kamailio will decide to use the local IP instead of the virtual one, and then the HA idea end up broken.... We can also force socket for everything. For regular call routing, this options actually works fine if the script always force some socket, but it seems to be not always possible for local generated messages. By disabling mhomed and using the dispatcher socket attr to send the OPTIONS message it works for example. But for the LCR module we have no option because apparently the LCR module has only one socket option, and so I am not able have a different socket per gateway. We can also explicitly set the src address for a routing rule to be the virtual IP instead of the local one. This makes Linux to return the virtual IP instead of the local one. This solution seems fine, but since it is done at linux level, every other service on the box would be affected and every route on the box would needed to be changed.. Another problem I found out is that I am not able to force the socket for local generated messages. It actually crashes Kamailio, and I always get a "core was not generated" msg.... anyone aware of that? The actual fix for this, would be having Kamailio to search the most appropriate socket in a different manner. It could loop the sockets and see which one reaches the destination instead of asking Linux to do it, or it could have some routing directives which could be consulted before selecting a socket.... (just ideas, not sure how feasible they are...) I am considering using the Linux routing change option, but has anyone faced such situation before? Regards, Patrick Wakano On 24 August 2017 at 09:18, Patrick Wakano <pwakano(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Daniel, > I still couldn't make this SIP probing work.... So currently my setup > cannot actively check for GW availability... > Any idea about what may be causing it? > > Thanks for your time, > Patrick Wakano > > On 16 August 2017 at 13:01, Patrick Wakano <pwakano(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Forgot to mention it is a centos7 box... >> >> On 16 Aug. 2017 11:02 am, "Patrick Wakano" <pwakano(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Daniel! >>> Very grateful for your attention! >>> >>> Apologies for lacking important info, check below the version and >>> sockets. >>> It may be worth mentioning these IPs are virtual ones and I am using net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind >>> = 1(in this case the virtual IP is assigned to the box) >>> Interesting that it has a "mhomed: no" for all sockets but I do have >>> mhomed=1 in my cfg file.... could that be the issue? >>> Also there is no message before this one: /usr/sbin/kamailio[6164]: >>> ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:181]: get_out_socket(): no socket found >>> This is the first one that pops when dispatcher tries to ping.... >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Patrick >>> >>> kamailio -v >>> version: kamailio 5.0.2 (x86_64/linux) >>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, >>> USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, >>> TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, >>> USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, >>> HAVE_RESOLV_RES >>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, >>> MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB >>> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. >>> id: unknown >>> compiled on 12:03:49 Jun 26 2017 with gcc 4.8.5 >>> >>> kamcmd> core.sockets_list >>> { >>> socket: { >>> proto: udp >>> address: 172.28.128.100 >>> ipaddress: 172.28.128.100 >>> port: 5060 >>> mcast: no >>> mhomed: no >>> } >>> socket: { >>> proto: udp >>> address: 192.168.33.100 >>> ipaddress: 192.168.33.100 >>> port: 5060 >>> mcast: no >>> mhomed: no >>> } >>> socket: { >>> proto: tcp >>> address: 172.28.128.100 >>> ipaddress: 172.28.128.100 >>> port: 5060 >>> mcast: no >>> mhomed: no >>> } >>> socket: { >>> proto: tcp >>> address: 192.168.33.100 >>> ipaddress: 192.168.33.100 >>> port: 5060 >>> mcast: no >>> mhomed: no >>> } >>> socket: { >>> proto: tcp >>> address: 172.28.128.100 >>> ipaddress: 172.28.128.100 >>> port: 8080 >>> mcast: no >>> mhomed: no >>> } >>> } >>> >>> >>> On 15 August 2017 at 17:24, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> what are the sockets kamailio is listening on? See `kamcmd help` for >>>> the command that lists the sockets. >>>> >>>> Also, what is the log messages before the first one you pasted, there >>>> should be another one printed from get_out_socket(). >>>> It is always important to provide kamailio version (kamailio -v) and >>>> the operating system you are using. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> On 14.08.17 14:41, Patrick Wakano wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Kamailio list, >>>> >>>> Hope you all doing well! >>>> >>>> I am stuck with one problem that should be incredibly easy to be done, >>>> but apparently it is not.... I want my dispatcher, LCR and nathelper >>>> modules to always SIP ping my SIP clients. I have a Kamailio based SBC that >>>> is separating two networks, and so I am using the 'mhomed' flag, but none >>>> of these SIP pings are working.... for now I will only ask about the >>>> dispatcher.... >>>> My dispatcher module has to talk with SIP servers in both networks, the >>>> thing is when I enable SIP ping for it (modparam("dispatcher", >>>> "ds_probing_mode", 1)), it gives me this type of error: >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[6164]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:181]: >>>> get_out_socket(): no socket found >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[6164]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: >>>> get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp: >>>> 192.168.33.110:6060) >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[6164]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:317]: uri2dst2(): no >>>> corresponding socket found for "192.168.33.110" af 2 (udp: >>>> 192.168.33.110:6060) >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[6164]: ERROR: tm [uac.c:443]: t_uac_prepare(): no >>>> socket found >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[6164]: ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2652]: >>>> ds_ping_set(): unable to ping [sip:192.168.33.110:6060] >>>> >>>> After research it seems I need to manually set a "socket" attribute for >>>> each of my GWs in dispatcher list. After putting the socket parameter for >>>> the GW, I got another error: >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[14190]: ERROR: <core> [core/socket_info.c:2046]: >>>> parse_protohostport(): bad port number in udp:192.168.33.100:5060 >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[14190]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:181]: >>>> get_out_socket(): no socket found >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[14190]: ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:183]: >>>> get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp: >>>> 192.168.33.110:6060) >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[14190]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:317]: uri2dst2(): no >>>> corresponding socket found for "192.168.33.110" af 2 (udp: >>>> 192.168.33.110:6060) >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[14190]: ERROR: tm [uac.c:443]: t_uac_prepare(): no >>>> socket found >>>> /usr/sbin/kamailio[14190]: ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2652]: >>>> ds_ping_set(): unable to ping [sip:192.168.33.110:6060] >>>> >>>> What can be wrong in my port info in the socket config? (I tried the >>>> socket with and without quotes but had no luck...) >>>> select * from dispatcher where id=2; >>>> id | setid | destination | flags | priority >>>> | attrs | description >>>> ----+-------+-------------------------+-------+----------+-- >>>> -------------------------------------------+--------------------- >>>> 2 | 2 | sip:192.168.33.110:6060 | 0 | 0 | socket="udp: >>>> 192.168.33.100:5060";rweight=50 | >>>> (1 row) >>>> >>>> Anyhow, I was expecting the 'mhomed' parameter to do the socket >>>> selection for me. Regular call routing either by the dispatcher or by LCR, >>>> also seems to require me to explicitly set the socket otherwise Kamailio >>>> (or the OS) may end up using the wrong socket. So, another question is why >>>> 'mhomed' does not dictate the whole socket selection Kamailio has to do >>>> regardless the module it is using to send SIP requests? >>>> >>>> Sorry for the long e-mail.... >>>> Best regards, >>>> Patrick Wakano >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing Listsr-dev@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlawww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com >>>> Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com >>>> >>>> >>> >

2 2

LCR Ping GWs
by Patrick Wakano 25 Sep '17

25 Sep '17

Hello list, I was trying to activate continuous SIP ping from the LCR module, which apparently was available in the past, but currently it is not possible anymore. As I could check It can only ping inactive GWs. Question is, why such change was promoted? We have to send a call to the GW to detect it has died instead of actively monitoring them and so avoid this useless call attempt. It is not that big deal, but it does gives me a better monitoring of my providers (specially the ones not used so frequently) health. Regards, Patrick

1 0

Enabling Redirection in Kamailio SIP Server
by Anas Rasheed 23 Sep '17

23 Sep '17

How can we enable redirection in Kamilio SIP Server using Siremis User Interface for it? Can anyone provide us with the tutorial of it?

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users