6 Nov
2003
6 Nov
'03
11:43 a.m.
Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul writes:
i have also seen ngrep missing parts of working messages, so i suspect
there is a bug in ngrep.
-- juha
U
1.1.16.55:5060 -> 1.1.19.48:1388 25017@0:1480
...l....SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.1.19.48:1388..From: <sip:6526@s
^^^^^^^^
Is there really garbage before SIP or is this a ngrep artifact?