26 Aug
2009
26 Aug
'09
5:25 p.m.
Oh. And BTW. This is with 1.5.2-tls.
James Puckett - Engineers' Consulting Group
Phone 229-316-0012 - Fax 229-316-1490
On Aug 26, 2009, at 10:13 AM, James Puckett wrote:
I have posted the log to
http://cpem.stage2.net/kamailio-mem.log.
This log contains 2000 calls of memory information.
James Puckett - Engineers' Consulting Group
Phone 229-316-0012 - Fax 229-316-1490
On Aug 26, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 26.08.2009 2:07 Uhr, James Puckett wrote:
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users I have followed a bit of the discussions
regarding the problems
with memory management between the perl modules and the core
kamailio software.
that is when calling functions exported by modules that need
fixup.
For append_branch() should not be the case.
I need to get append_branch working from within the perl module so
that it doesn't cause a memory leak. It's been a while since I
did any serious straight C programming, but if someone can point
me to the correct way to handle memory allocated with the module
so that it gets freed in the core I'd be glad to take this problem
on.
Specifically, I'm using something that looks like:
$m->append_branch("<sip:".$cdpn."\@".$peers{$_}."?From=%3Csip:".
$sourcenumber."(a)".$destIp."%3E;tag=".$fromtag.">"=".$fromtag.">",
$qval);
This leaves about 190 bytes per call unfreed.
Do you have the memory log? That will help to troubleshoot.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
* http://www.asipto.com/