3 Jun
2005
3 Jun
'05
1:06 p.m.
Simply because it allows you then to use SER to terminate to them, and
they then handoff the traffic, also you only need to open an account at
one place, and billing is easier....Having said that I dont use them, I
merely tested with them. Having said that it all depends on your setup,
and exactly what it is you are trying to do, if you are happy with one
endpoint, do it that way, tie up tightly with them, you see each gateway
will have its own quirks, or have your own gateways, it depends on how
flexibile you wish to be.
Iqbal
Ritesh Jalan wrote:
Hi Iqbal Sir
Can you tell us how reliable are IPCB? as you have recomended them, further
they dont terminate calls, you need to buy mins from someone else. They only
have the hosted switch. then why we should use SER with IPCB??
Thanks & Regards
Ritesh Jalan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Iqbal" <iqbal(a)gigo.co.uk>
To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 10:39 PM
Subject: [Serusers] interconnect with ipcb
Hi
A few people here were looking to terminate traffic using SER and
looking for pstn end gateways, well if you sign up with ipcb.net (and no
I am not connected to them..but hoping if they read this, i will get a
pizza out of this :-)) you can connect SER to any of the gateways you
wish worldwide.
How they do it is simple, they have written a module which you compile
into ser, load as normal, it has a user/pass in it, and u assign there
IP address as trusted in ur config. Then when any requests are sent, the
auth you using that user/pass, and let traffic flow. Works fine.
Now I was wondering if some of the programmers on this list could take a
look at the module (they will email it to you) surely it would be easy
to do the same for any gateway out there....I guess
Anyhow now all SER people can get their own gateways.
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.