23 Jul
2003
23 Jul
'03
2:23 p.m.
>We are using Check Point firewall I configured
this
>server to allow both way in/out and NATED with public
>IP.
>For testing purpose I kept all ports opened in the
>firewall, for this particular server. I don�t why I am
>not able to register it.
Might take a closer look at the Checkpoint to see if it is
doing Port Address Translation (PAT) in addition to NAT.
If I recall correctly, the older versions of Checkpoints
software did PAT, which caused folks problems when an app
wanted to use specific tcp/udp port numbers (for example,
when trying to use an non-checkpoint VPN box on the inside
of the checkpoint).
Which is better
PSTN gateway. We are looking at 1 to 2
FXS port at this time for testing purpose.
? FXS is a PSTN-phone-2-IP gateway, isn't it? The most
popular is cisco's ata.