Greg,
According to snom engineering you should put
the routing
information in the first 200 OK we receive.
Can you do that and try it?
You can test against my proxy if you like to
see how it should work.
Regards,
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Fausak
[mailto:greg@august.net]
Sent:
To: 'Kevin'
Cc: 'Robert Messer'; sip@august.net;
serusers@lists.iptel.org
Subject: RE: Snom phone (fwd)
Kevin,
I initially sent the
packet:
> > > This is
that packet that came from the last 200 OK <- PROXY:
> > >
> > > #
> > > U
2003/02/24 07:56:52.503535 216.87.144.203:5060 ->
> >
216.87.145.22:5060
> > > SIP/2.0
200 OK.
> > > Via:
SIP/2.0/UDP 216.87.145.22:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-ng5tokyx448r.
> > > From:
"snom man" <sip:4695461245@augustvoice.net>;tag=8u6ju8wxuc.
> > > To:
<sip:2143357976@augustvoice.net;user=phone>;tag=3CBB0360-532.
> > > Date:
> > > Call-ID:
3c267202b6a8-lgseu8olovlp@216.87.145.22.
> > > Server:
Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x.
> > > CSeq: 2
INVITE.
> > >
Session-Expires: 7200;refresher=uac.
> > > Require:
timer.
> > >
Allow-Events: telephone-event.
> > > Contact:
<sip:92143357976@216.87.144.196:5060;user=phone>.
> > >
Record-Route: <sip:2143357976@216.87.144.203;ftag=8u6ju8wxuc;lr>.
> > >
Content-Type: application/sdp.
> > >
Content-Length: 209.
> > > .
> > > v=0.
> > >
o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 7543 5694 IN IP4 216.87.144.196.
> > > s=SIP
Call.
> > > c=IN IP4
216.87.144.196.
> > > t=0 0.
> > > m=audio
16632 RTP/AVP 0 100.
> > > a=rtpmap:0
PCMU/8000.
> > >
a=rtpmap:100 X-NSE/8000.
> > > a=fmtp:100
192-194.
> > >
This is the 200 OK
(response to the INVITE) message as delivered to the phone.
I couldn't figure out
what you were saying, so I went back to
the ethereal trace.
After the snom phone receives a 183 status
message, it sends a PRACK
to the PROXY. This PRACK is
OKed, without a
Record-route. The next message is an OK
responding to the
original INVITE, which does indeed have a Record-Route.
So, you are saying that
the OK to your PRACK needs a record route?
I can do that I think,
because the OK to the INVITE does indeed have
a Record-route.
I don't even know what a
PRACK is for...
---greg