19 Nov
2007
19 Nov
'07
1:50 a.m.
At 23:51 18/11/2007, Robert Dyck wrote:
On Sunday 18 November 2007, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Let me defend Twinkle here -- it not only does not violate the spec, it follows
it. in-dialog messages are not supposed to change route set.
Jiri Kuthan writes:
Speaking of Twinkle, that is the UA I was referring to in my previous post on
this thread. During a re-INVITE it does not return an Record-Route list with
its 200 OK. This does not violate the spec just wondering if you can refer me to some
common-sense sip ua?
(I agree with your point, I'm just painfuly anaware of such a ua.)
jiri,
try twiinkle.
-- juha but it causes inter-working
problems with asterisk because asterisk appears to create an empty route set
and the ACK will not find its way. I had a brief Email exchange with the
author of Twinkle. He was reluctant to implement a work around to fix a
problem with another UA. Other UA's that I have encountered send an RR list
with the 200 OK during re-INVITE.
Well -- I think you should have had first a conversation with asterisk developers.
-jiri
Rob
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/