Hello,
No, that's not the case, see below the INVITE sent to the branch:
INVITE sip:123456789@1.2.3.4:5060;transport=UDP SIP/2.0
Record-Route: <sip:1.2.3.4:5060;lr;ftag=244c2803;did=cb4.8cb>
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:5060
;branch=z9hG4bK0f41.5079ae8da835958ee58ca1e8a4eb057b.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.10:40769
;received=1.3.5.7;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---46a5782b47b6ec85;rport=40769
Max-Forwards: 69
Contact: <sip:101@1.3.5.7:40769;transport=UDP;alias=1.3.5.7~40769~1>
To: <sip:123456789@1.2.3.4:5060>
From: <sip:101@1.2.3.4:5060;transport=UDP>;tag=244c2803
Call-ID: KfuC1GMvCvk1YCSKnHwDrw..
CSeq: 2 INVITE
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, MESSAGE, OPTIONS, INFO,
SUBSCRIBE
Content-Type: application/sdp
User-Agent: Z 5.4.12 v2.10.13.2-mod
Allow-Events: presence, kpml, talk
Content-Length: 336
TOH: 123456789
v=0
o=Z 1620220570589 1 IN IP4 1.3.5.7
s=Z
c=IN IP4 1.3.5.7
t=0 0
m=audio 8000 RTP/AVP 106 9 98 101 0 8 3
a=rtpmap:106 opus/48000/2
a=fmtp:106 sprop-maxcapturerate=16000; minptime=20; useinbandfec=1
a=rtpmap:98 telephone-event/48000
a=fmtp:98 0-16
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=sendrecv
thanks
On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 16:24, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
the CANCEL to be sent is generated locally by tm module from the INVITE
that was sent on the branch, so the errors is actually about a duplicate To
header in that INVITE. Check it on the network to see if that's the case.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05.05.21 16:25, Ilie Soltanici wrote:
Hello,
We are having an issue here where Kamailio is complaining about duplicate
To header, while in the SIP Packet there is just one. See below the log
message:
DEBUG: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:391]: build_local_reparse(): duplicate To header
ERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:531]: build_local_reparse(): cannot build CANCEL
request
ERROR: tm [t_cancel.c:297]: cancel_branch(): attempt to build a CANCEL
failed
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1434]: e2e_cancel(): cancel error
And this is the sip message:
CANCEL sip:123456789@1.2.3.4:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.1:19373
;branch=z9hG4bK-524287-1---7774073fad1a3264;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
To: <sip:123456789@1.2.3.4:5060>
From: "101"<sip:101@1.2.3.4:5060>;tag=6f373b66
Call-ID: hC2O6zx8ZaUJ1di046
CSeq: 2 CANCEL
Proxy-Authorization: Digest
username="101",realm="1.2.3.4",nonce="YJKbfWCSmlFTHxdJfKmySydF9L7FzfaqcgyOo4A=",uri="
sip:123456789@1.2.3.4:5060
",response="2bf2ba8ef2374d6aa8c39d650613077d",algorithm=MD5
User-Agent: TEST
Content-Length: 0
version: kamailio 5.5.0 (x86_64/linux) d4c1a1
The route itself, is like in the standard documentation:
# CANCEL processing
if KSR.is_CANCEL() :
KSR.info(RANDOM_LOG + 'KSR.is_CANCEL')
if KSR.tm.t_check_trans()>0 :
self.ksr_route_relay(msg)
return 1
def ksr_route_relay(self, msg):
if KSR.is_method_in("IBSU") :
if KSR.tm.t_is_set("branch_route")<0 :
KSR.tm.t_on_branch("ksr_branch_manage")
if KSR.is_method_in("ISU") :
if KSR.tm.t_is_set("onreply_route")<0 :
KSR.tm.t_on_reply("ksr_onreply_manage")
if KSR.is_INVITE() :
if KSR.tm.t_is_set("failure_route")<0 :
KSR.tm.t_on_failure("ksr_failure_manage")
if KSR.tm.t_relay()<0 :
KSR.sl.sl_reply_error()
return -255
Thanks
__________________________________________________________
Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
* sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
*
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone)
*
https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/