Hi Michael,
I found and fixed the problem - I was able to reproduce in a testbed the scenario and to properly test it. Let me know if it work ok for you also.
regards, bogdan
Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
Bogdan,
The problem is still there and actually I can't see any difference.
0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2@192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060 0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: looked up: sip:xyz_100_1_st2@192.168.0.249:5060 flags: 00000040 0(14899) INVITE: cseq=102: sip:xyz_100_1_st2@192.168.0.249:5060: RELAYING to sip:192.168.76.250:1083 (flags: 00000040)... 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2@192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: looked up: sip:xyz_100_1_st2@192.168.0.249:5060 flags: 00000040 0(14899) CANCEL: cseq=102: sip:xyz_100_1_st2@192.168.0.249:5060: RELAYING to sip:192.168.76.250:1083 (flags: 00000040)... 0(14899) ACK: cseq=102: ruri=sip:xyz_100_1_st2@192.168.83.61 received from 192.168.80.26:5060 0(14899) <null>: cseq=102: onreply_route_log: received: 100 Trying from 192.168.76.250:1083 0(14899) <null>: cseq=102: onreply_route_log: received: 180 Ringing from 192.168.76.250:1083
ngrep shows that CANCEL is never get sent to the user xyz_100_1_st2 at 192.168.76.250:1083
Michael
On Monday 15 August 2005 01:03 pm, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Michael,
I added in TM some code which should solve this problem - unfortunately is not tested yet since the scenario is quite difficult to reproduce. Can you please give it a try a report de output - crash, the same or success?
thanks and regards, bogdan
Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
Great! Thanks Bogdan! I'll be the first to test it. I just wanted to point out that it's really amusing how responsive openser developers are and how impressive openser development pace is. Very good experience so far. Thanks a lot.
Michael
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 11:32 am, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Michael,
that's exactly the trick I wanted to try to solve this issue (see my previous email)...but I will have to dig to see how difficult is to implement.
regards, bogdan