2 Sep
2004
2 Sep
'04
5:01 p.m.
On Sep 2, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Ezequiel Colombo wrote:
Hi Adrian, Jan, this is a good initiative.
As a litle contribution i sugest the introduction of a "strip" column
in the
lcr table and the logic in the module to strip digits in the dialed
number
before prepend the "prefix". This digit manipulation is commonly
needed in
inter carrier routing.
Yes
curious: (Adrian): You make the gateway lookup using a
loop function
that
make several selects to db after obtain a match in "destination" ???
Yes because you might have 5 gateways with different priorities used in
each failure route
Thanks
Ezequiel Colombo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Georgescu" <ag(a)ag-projects.com>
To: "Jan Janak" <jan(a)iptel.org>
Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Failover PSTN Gateways
Yes Jan, if less work the better.
On Sep 2, 2004, at 1:41 PM, Jan Janak wrote:
On 02-09 13:06, Adrian Georgescu wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
On Sep 2, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Jan Janak wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, in the document you mention that subsequent
> requests (ACK, BYE) go to the same gateway, but that is something
> that
> would happen anyway because the gateway puts its Contact into reply
> and
> record-routing will route subsequent messages to that contact.
> Do you plan to write any additional support for that or did I just
> misunderstand the text ?
Yes there will be some additional support to make sure same route si
followed regardless of how the phone (mis)behaves.
What does that mean ? Record-routing will do the job for you and if
it
is broken in the phone then there is a really high chance that it
will
have severe interoperability problems, so why bother with storing
additional session state ?
Jan.