On Sep 2, 2004, at 2:34 PM, Ezequiel Colombo wrote:
Hi Adrian, Jan, this is a good initiative. As a litle contribution i sugest the introduction of a "strip" column in the lcr table and the logic in the module to strip digits in the dialed number before prepend the "prefix". This digit manipulation is commonly needed in inter carrier routing.
Yes
curious: (Adrian): You make the gateway lookup using a loop function that make several selects to db after obtain a match in "destination" ???
Yes because you might have 5 gateways with different priorities used in each failure route
Thanks Ezequiel Colombo
----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Georgescu" ag@ag-projects.com To: "Jan Janak" jan@iptel.org Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:59 AM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Failover PSTN Gateways
Yes Jan, if less work the better.
On Sep 2, 2004, at 1:41 PM, Jan Janak wrote:
On 02-09 13:06, Adrian Georgescu wrote:
On Sep 2, 2004, at 12:22 PM, Jan Janak wrote:
Just out of curiosity, in the document you mention that subsequent requests (ACK, BYE) go to the same gateway, but that is something that would happen anyway because the gateway puts its Contact into reply and record-routing will route subsequent messages to that contact. Do you plan to write any additional support for that or did I just misunderstand the text ?
Yes there will be some additional support to make sure same route si followed regardless of how the phone (mis)behaves.
What does that mean ? Record-routing will do the job for you and if it is broken in the phone then there is a really high chance that it will have severe interoperability problems, so why bother with storing additional session state ?
Jan.
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers